How flags unite and divide us Michael Green

Transcriber: Joseph Geni
Reviewer: Camille Martínez

In 1989,

an artist by the name of Dread Scott,

who has also graced the TED stage,

created a piece of art in Chicago,

where he simply placed
an American flag on the ground

and then invited you the viewer
to go and stand on that flag

and record how it felt in a journal.

And to me, one of the most powerful things
written in that journal, in essence, says,

“Why are we so OK

with homeless people,

with human beings laying on the ground,

but not flags?”

And to some of you,
this piece of art is quite disturbing.

And that’s kind of the point
of this talk –

not to upset you or to make you mad

but to prove to you that flags
have an incredible power,

and that even if you think
you don’t care about flags, you do.

You know you do.

Alright.

By the end of it,
I hope that you’re inspired

to go out and harness this power of flags
and fight for a better world.

But before we get there,

we’re going to start
on the opposite end of the spectrum.

And before I show you the next stuff,
I need to say that anything I show here

is not an endorsement,

it’s usually quite the opposite.

But more than anything,
what I want to do is create a space here

where we can look
at these flags, these designs,

and examine how they make us feel.

We’re going to talk about our emotions.

Is that OK with everybody?

OK.

Are you ready for your first flag?

Cool, we’ll start with an easy one.

That was a joke. (Laughs)

So, some of you may be a little bit uneasy
sitting in a room with this.

I’m certainly feeling uneasy
standing in front of it.

Some of you may be feeling
a little bit of pride.

And that’s understandable. This is Texas.
This is not a rare sight, is it?

But let’s start with the facts.

So this is not the Confederate flag. OK?

This is the battle flag
of the Army of Northern Virginia

led by General Robert E. Lee.

So next time someone tells you
that this is their heritage,

unless their family fought
for that very specific militia,

they’re wrong, alright?

And you have a flag expert’s
permission to tell them so.

This flag rose into prominence
during the mid-1950s and ’60s

as a response to the growing
Civil Rights Movement.

And then of course today,

it has come to represent
the Confederacy to most of us.

But I shouldn’t have to remind you
what the Confederacy is.

It was a rogue nation

that rose up against the United States,

waged war on the US,

and at one point in time,

this was one of the most
un-American things you could have.

But yet, this flag is protected

by the same laws that protect
the United States flag

in the states of Florida, Georgia,

South Carolina, Mississippi and Louisiana.

But let’s pick on Georgia
for a second, shall we?

So in 1956,

a few years after desegregation
was mandated in public schools,

Georgia changed their state flag to this.

I think everyone watching can agree

that this was not meant to be a flag
that every Georgian was proud to fly

outside of their home, was it?

No.

Just like all of the Confederate statues
erected in the mid-1950s and ’60s,

this was meant to be a symbol
of who was in charge

and who was not.

This remained the flag of Georgia

until the year 2001,

and in that year, they changed their flag

to this.

Now, as a flag expert, I can tell you:
this is officially ugly.

OK? It’s OK to laugh at this flag.

It’s ugly, and because it’s so ugly,

that’s one of the reasons
they changed it just two years later.

They had a referendum

where they got to choose
between that thing

and then what is now
the current flag of Georgia.

Now some of you might be wondering,

“Wait a second, Michael –

if that before wasn’t
the Confederate flag,

what was the Confederate flag?”

Georgia flies the first flag
of the Confederate States of America

to this day.

They just slapped their state seal on it.

Well, let’s go back
to our emotions for a second.

That didn’t punch you in the gut
as much as the other one did, did it?

Right?

And that’s why I love flags.

They are the simplest pieces of design,

usually just two or three colors,

just some bars or stripes.

But yet, they can invoke
the deepest emotions within us.

They’ll make us swell with pride

or burn with hatred.

We will die for a flag

or even kill for one.

One of my favorite designers,
his name is Wally Olins,

they call him the father
of nation branding,

and he’s quoted as saying

that “Everyone wants to belong,

and then they want to display
symbols of belonging.”

And it’s crazy that these pieces of cloth
that are just sewn together or dyed

come to be such a sacred item,

and that’s because they become
parts of our identity.

They are powerful tools to unify

but equally powerful tools to divide.

You ready for the next flag?

Right.

Take a moment.

Really examine how you felt
when this hit the screen.

I’m going to change
the slide pretty quickly

so you don’t take pictures of me
in front of this one.

(Laughter)

Alright?

So Germany after World War I,

it was in a pretty bad state,

and a young Adolf Hitler had a lot of –
let’s call them – “ideas,”

of how Germany got to where they’d gotten

and how to get them out.

He spent entire chapters
in his book “Mein Kampf,”

which I don’t recommend reading,

about how Germany lost World War I

partially because the British
had better graphic design

and better propaganda.

So, as the Nazi Party rose,

Hitler created one of the thickest
brand guides I’ve ever seen.

It’s thicker than most
company brand guides today,

and in it, he details titles and uniforms

and lots and lots of flags.

Hitler knew the power of flags.

He says in “Mein Kampf,”

“The new flag … should prove
effective as a large poster,

[because] in hundreds
of thousands of cases

a really striking emblem
may be the first cause

of awakening interest
in a movement.”

He was an artist, after all.

He knew the power
of visual identity and uniforms

could reignite the German identity.

And to millions of Germans,
this was a welcome sign.

But of course, this was also
a mark of death to others.

We don’t often think of flags as weapons,

but like the Confederate battle flag,

the Germans used their flag

to make an out-group feel unwelcome

and less than.

You see, when you create a flag,
you immediately do two things:

you create an in-group,

a group that’s meant
to be represented by the symbol,

but then, inevitably,
you create an out-group.

And usually, that’s subtle.

It’s a byproduct.

It’s usually not the intent.

But the Germans were very clear
as to who was represented by the swastika

and who was not.

In 1935, Jewish people were banned
from flying German flags.

And in this way,

the Germans, maybe more than
any other time in history,

used the dual power of flags

to unite but also to divide.

Flags were used as identity weapons.

And now, in 2019, the Nazi flag
is banned from being flown

by anyone in Germany

and anyone in Austria, in Hungary,
in Russia and in Ukraine.

Think about that.

It’s a piece of cloth, but it’s banned.

On its face, that sounds crazy.

But I don’t think anyone
in this room would disagree

that it’s probably good.

Sounds a lot like a weapon.

As a vexillologist,

sometimes the most interesting
thing about a flag

is not so much its design,

but it’s those laws around the flag.

For instance,

in India, to create an Indian flag,

you must use a hand-spun
cloth named “khadi.”

If you make a flag out of anything else,

you could go to jail
for up to three years.

It’s crazy.

Here in Texas,

we’ve all heard

that the Texas flag is the only state flag
that can fly at the same height

as the US, flag, right?

Because we were a nation
before we were a state.

Who here has heard that?

Yeah.

Well, I’m here to tell you
that is completely false. OK?

First of all, we were not the only state
that was a nation before joining up.

And secondly, all state flags can fly
at the same height as the US flag

according to the US flag code.

And I don’t have to ask you
how you feel about this one, right?

Most of us grew up pledging allegiance
to this every morning,

knowing we should never
let it touch the ground, etc.

We take our flag code very seriously
here in the United States.

You remember, recently some NFL players
kneeling during the national anthem.

It was a big controversy.

They were breaking the flag code.

It states during the national anthem,

stand at attention,
hand at the heart, etc.

But what was fascinating to me
as a vexillologist

is that I didn’t see
anyone getting upset

when something like this happens.

The flag code says, “The flag should never
be carried flat or horizontally,

but always aloft and free.”

So sometimes during
the exact same national anthem,

this was being done,
and no one’s upset.

Or this. This happens all the time.

The flag code is clear:

“No part of the flag should ever be used
as a costume or on an athletic uniform.”

This is Texas A&M baseball,

not to get them in trouble,
but this happens all the time,

especially in November.

I’m sure, I can almost guarantee
when you leave here tonight,

you will see on the back
of someone’s car or truck

a black and white American flag
with a blue stripe,

a thin blue line, right?

Blue Lives Matter.

That breaks the flag code
in multiple ways.

But all of these things are done
with the best intent.

No one’s here to argue that.

But of course they break
a section of the flag code

titled “Respect for the Flag,”

so by putting this on your uniform,

you are legally disrespecting the flag.

And what I find interesting

is that those NFL players
kneeling during the anthem

and the people who would put
Blue Lives Matters stickers on their car

are both on the opposite end
of a very big issue,

but they’re both breaking
the exact same law,

a law that is 100 percent unenforceable.

In fact, it was Dread Scott’s
piece of art in 1989

that led the Supreme Court to rule
that the flag code is just a guideline.

You cannot be prosecuted
for breaking the flag code.

You cannot be forced to be patriotic.

So why, then, have all of these
little laws around how we use our flag

if you can’t enforce them?

And that’s because a nation

is a fragile collective idea.

It only exists in our minds.

Can I see this? Thank you.

Sometimes a flag is the only
tangible symbol of that idea.

Right? Our unity is sometimes
only held together by literal threads.

And that’s powerful.

The flag code is meant to preserve
and protect that fragile idea,

while also protecting
your right to break it.

And that’s what’s special
about the United States, right?

And that’s what’s unique about our flag.

Our flag is amazing.

It has changed more than
any other flag in the world.

It’s the flag code that says
when a new state is created,

a star shall be added
to the union of the flag,

and such addition shall take place
on the fourth day of July.

Our flag is unique because
it is meant to grow as we grow.

By design and by law,

it is meant to change with us.

It’s a living symbol of our individuality,

our diversity in the stars

and our unity.

We have a gift in the United States
to have a flag that is inclusive.

If the Nazi flag was an identity weapon,

the United States flag, by design alone,
stands in direct contrast.

And I have to say,
as a vexillologist in 2019,

using this flag

as an identity weapon against anyone

disrespects it far more
than letting it touch the ground

or any one of the other little laws
that we break every day.

Right?

This flag is a symbol of our unity.

We should never use this as a weapon
against someone else.

I resonate so deeply with the person
who wrote in Dread Scott’s journal,

“We should never value the symbol
over the thing that it symbolizes.

We should never value a piece of cloth
over a human life.”

And if you’re ever going to use
a piece of cloth as a weapon,

you should never use this one,

not when it has always
had room for more stars.

Hopefully by now, you’ve felt
the power of flags,

and you can see what they can do.

So what if we harnessed that power,

and we used it to fight
for something greater?

This is the flag of Earth,

designed by Oskar Pernefeldt of Sweden.

Just imagine with me for a second:

What if we celebrated our humanity

as much if not more

than we celebrate our nationalities?

As we become a spacefaring civilization
and we go off into the stars,

what do our nations mean anyway

when you’re standing on the surface
of Mars or any other planet?

And then of course, back here on Earth,

as our planet is facing a climate crisis,

as our climate could be unlivable in
our children or grandchildren’s lifetime,

I believe we need a strong symbol, a flag,

to unite us to fight,

not just as nations,

but as a species.

Thank you.

(Applause)

抄写员:Joseph Geni
审稿人:Camille Martínez

1989 年,

一位名叫 Dread Scott 的

艺术家也曾登上 TED 舞台,他

在芝加哥创作了一件艺术品

,他只是
将一面美国国旗放在地上

,然后邀请你 观众
去站在那面旗帜上,

并在日记中记录它的感受。

对我来说,
那本杂志上写的最有力的东西之一,本质上是说,

“为什么我们

对无家可归的人如此满意

,人类躺在地上,

而不是旗帜?”

对你们中的一些人来说,
这件艺术品相当令人不安。

这就是
这次谈话的重点——

不是要让你不高兴或让你生气,

而是要向你证明旗帜
具有不可思议的力量

,即使你认为
你不关心旗帜,你也会这样做。

你知道你会的。

好吧。

到最后,
我希望你受到鼓舞

,走出去,利用旗帜的力量,
为更美好的世界而战。

但在我们到达那里之前,

我们将从
光谱的另一端开始。

在我向你展示下一个东西之前,
我需要说我在这里展示的任何东西

都不是背书,

它通常恰恰相反。

但最重要的是,
我想做的是在这里创造一个空间,

让我们可以
看到这些旗帜、这些设计,

并检查它们给我们带来的感受。

我们要谈谈我们的情绪。

大家都这样吗?

行。

你准备好迎接你的第一面旗帜了吗?

酷,我们将从一个简单的开始。

那只是个玩笑。 (笑)

所以,你们中的一些人可能会有点不安地
坐在一个房间里。

站在它面前,我当然感到不安。

你们中的一些人可能会感到
有点自豪。

这是可以理解的。 这是德克萨斯。
这不是罕见的景象,是吗?

但让我们从事实开始。

所以这不是联邦旗帜。 好的?

这是

罗伯特·李将军率领的北弗吉尼亚军队的战旗。

所以下次有人告诉你
这是他们的遗产,

除非他们的家人
为那个非常特定的民兵而战,

否则他们错了,好吗?

而且你有旗帜专家的
许可告诉他们。 作为对日益增长的民权运动的回应,

这面旗帜
在 1950 年代中期和 60 年代兴起

当然,今天,

它已经代表
了我们大多数人的联邦。

但我不应该提醒
你邦联是什么。

这是一个

反抗美国的流氓国家,

对美国发动战争

,在某个时间点,

这是
你能拥有的最不美国的东西之一。

但是,这面国旗受到保护

佛罗里达州、乔治亚州、

南卡罗来纳州、密西西比州和路易斯安那州美国国旗的相同法律的保护。

但是让我们先来看看
格鲁吉亚,好吗?

所以在 1956 年,

在公立学校强制取消种族隔离几年后,

佐治亚州将州旗改为了这个。

我想每个观看的人都会同意

,这并不是
每个格鲁吉亚人都自豪地

在他们家门外飘扬的旗帜,是吗?

。就像
在 1950 年代中期和 60 年代竖立的所有邦联雕像一样,

这意味着

负责谁不负责的象征。

这一直是格鲁吉亚的国旗,

直到 2001 年

,在那一年,他们把国旗改成了

这个。

现在,作为旗帜专家,我可以告诉你:
这在官方上是丑陋的。

好的? 可以嘲笑这面旗帜。

它很丑,因为它太丑了,


就是他们在两年后改变它的原因之一。

他们进行了一次公投

,他们必须
在这件事


现在的格鲁吉亚国旗之间做出选择。

现在你们中的一些人可能想知道,

“等一下,迈克尔——

如果以前
不是同盟旗,

那么同盟旗是什么?”

格鲁吉亚至今仍悬挂
着美利坚联盟国的第一面旗帜

他们只是在上面盖上了州印章。

好吧,让
我们回到我们的情绪上。

这并没有像其他人那样猛烈地打你的肠子
,是吗?

对?

这就是我喜欢旗帜的原因。

它们是最简单的设计,

通常只有两种或三种颜色,

只是一些条形或条纹。

但是,它们可以唤起
我们内心最深处的情感。

它们会让我们因骄傲而膨胀

或因仇恨而燃烧。

我们会为一面旗帜而死,

甚至为一面而死。

我最喜欢的设计师之一,
他的名字是 Wally Olins,

他们称他
为国家品牌之父

,引用他的话说

:“每个人都想拥有归属感,

然后他们想要展示
归属感的象征。”

这些刚刚缝合或

染色的布片成为如此神圣的物品真是太疯狂了

,那是因为它们
成为我们身份的一部分。

它们是统一的强大工具,

但同样强大的分裂工具。

你准备好迎接下一个旗帜了吗?

对。

花点时间。

真正检查一下
当它出现在屏幕上时的感受。

我将
很快更换幻灯片,

这样你就不会
在这张幻灯片前给我拍照了。

(笑声)

好吗?

所以第一次世界大战后的德国,

它处于非常糟糕的状态

,年轻的阿道夫希特勒有很多——
让我们称之为——“想法”

,关于德国如何到达他们已经到达的地方

以及如何得到它们 出去。

他在我不建议阅读的
《我的奋斗》一书中用了整整一章来

讲述德国如何在第一次世界大战中失败,

部分原因是英国人
有更好的平面设计

和更好的宣传。

因此,随着纳粹党的崛起,

希特勒创造了我所见过的最厚实的
品牌指南之一。

它比
当今大多数公司的品牌指南都厚

,在里面,他详细介绍了头衔和制服

以及很多很多的旗帜。

希特勒知道旗帜的力量。

他在“我的奋斗”中说,

“新旗帜……应该
证明是一张大海报的效果,

[因为]在
数十万个案例中,

一个真正引人注目的标志
可能

是唤醒人们
对运动的兴趣的首要原因。”

毕竟他是个艺术家。

他知道
视觉识别和制服的力量

可以重新点燃德国的身份。

对于数百万德国人来说,
这是一个受欢迎的信号。

但当然,这
对其他人来说也是死亡的标志。

我们并不经常将旗帜视为武器,

但就像同盟国的战旗一样

,德国人使用他们的

旗帜让外群体感到不受欢迎

和不受欢迎。

你看,当你创建一个标志时,
你会立即做两件事:

你创建一个内组,

一个本
应由符号表示的组,

但随后,不可避免地,
你创建了一个外组。

通常,这很微妙。

这是一个副产品。

这通常不是本意。

但是德国人非常
清楚,卐字符代表

谁,谁不代表。

1935年,犹太人被
禁止悬挂德国国旗。

通过这种方式

,德国人也许比
历史上任何时候都更能

利用旗帜的双重力量

来团结,也可以分裂。

旗帜被用作身份武器。

现在,在 2019 年,

德国

和奥地利、匈牙利
、俄罗斯和乌克兰的任何人都禁止悬挂纳粹旗帜。

考虑一下。

这是一块布,但它被禁止了。

从表面上看,这听起来很疯狂。

但我认为
这个房间里的任何人都不会不

同意这可能是好的。

听起来很像武器。

作为一名旗帜学家,

有时
关于旗帜最有趣

的不是它的设计,

而是旗帜周围的那些法律。

例如,

在印度,要制作印度国旗,

您必须使用
名为“khadi”的手纺布。

如果你用其他任何东西制作一面旗帜,

你可能会入狱
长达三年。

这很疯狂。

在得克萨斯州,

我们都

听说得克萨斯州旗是
唯一可以

与美国旗子同高飘扬的州旗,对吧?

因为在我们成为一个国家
之前,我们是一个国家。

这里谁听说过?

是的。

好吧,我在这里告诉你
这是完全错误的。 好的?

首先,
在加入之前,我们并不是唯一一个国家。

其次,根据美国国旗代码,所有州旗都可以
在与美国国旗相同的高度飞行

而且我不必
问你对这个的感觉,对吧?

我们大多数人从小
就每天早上宣誓效忠,

知道我们永远不应该
让它接触地面,等等。

我们在美国非常重视我们的国旗代码

您还记得,最近一些 NFL 球员
在奏国歌时下跪。

这是一个很大的争议。

他们正在破坏国旗密码。

它在唱国歌时说,

立正,
手放在心脏等。


作为一名旗帜学家

,让我着迷的是,当这样的事情发生时,我没有看到
任何人感到不安

旗帜代码说:“旗帜永远
不应平放或水平,

而应始终高高且自由。”

所以有时
在完全相同的国歌期间,

这样做是为了
,没有人不高兴。

或这个。 这事儿常常发生。

旗帜代码很明确:

“旗帜的任何部分都不应用
作服装或运动服。”

这是德克萨斯 A&M 棒球,

不是为了让他们陷入困境,
但这一直在发生,

尤其是在 11 月。

我敢肯定,我几乎可以保证,
当你今晚离开这里时,

你会在
某人的汽车或卡车

的后面看到一面黑白的美国国旗,上面
有一条蓝色的条纹,

一条细的蓝线,对吧?

蓝色生活很重要。

这以多种方式破坏了标志代码

但所有这些事情都是
以最好的意图完成的。

没有人在这里争论。

但是,他们当然会
破坏国旗代码中

名为“尊重国旗”的部分,

因此将其放在您的制服上,

您在法律上不尊重国旗。

我觉得有趣的

是,那些
在唱国歌时跪下的 NFL 球员

和那些
在他们的车上贴上 Blue Lives Matters 贴纸的

人都站在
一个非常大的问题的另一端,

但他们都违反
了完全相同的法律,

100% 无法执行的法律。

事实上,正是恐惧斯科特
在 1989 年的艺术作品

导致最高法院
裁定国旗代码只是一个指导方针。

您不能
因破坏标志代码而受到起诉。

你不能被迫爱国。

那么,如果你不能执行这些
小法律,为什么还要围绕我们如何使用国旗

呢?

那是因为一个国家

是一个脆弱的集体观念。

它只存在于我们的脑海中。

我能看到这个吗? 谢谢你。

有时一面旗帜是该想法的唯一
有形象征。

对? 我们的团结有时
只通过字面上的线维系在一起。

这很强大。

标志代码旨在保留
和保护这个脆弱的想法,

同时也保护
你打破它的权利。

这就是
美国的特别之处,对吧?

这就是我们国旗的独特之处。

我们的旗帜很棒。

它的变化比
世界上任何其他旗帜都多。

国旗代码规定,
当一个新的州成立时,


在国旗的联合体上加一颗星

,这种加法应
在 7 月 4 日进行。

我们的旗帜是独一无二的,因为
它旨在随着我们的成长而成长。

根据设计和法律,

它意味着与我们一起改变。

它是我们个性

、星辰多样性

和团结的活生生的象征。

我们在美国有一份礼物,
那就是拥有一面包容的旗帜。

如果说纳粹旗帜是一种身份武器,

那么美国国旗就设计本身而言,
就形成了直接对比。

我不得不说,
作为 2019 年的旗帜学家,

使用这面旗帜

作为身份武器来对付任何

不尊重它的人,远远
超过让它触地

或我们每天违反的任何其他小
法律。

对?

这面旗帜是我们团结的象征。

我们永远不应该将其用作
对付他人的武器。

我与
在 Dread Scott 的日记中写道的那个人产生了如此深刻的共鸣,

“我们永远不应该重视符号
而不是它所象征的东西。

我们永远不应该重视一块布
而不是人的生命。”

如果你打算用
一块布作为武器,

你永远不应该使用它,

而不是当它总是
有空间容纳更多星星的时候。

希望到现在为止,您已经感受到
了旗帜的力量,

并且您可以看到它们可以做什么。

那么,如果我们利用这种力量,

并用它来争取
更大的东西呢?

这是地球的旗帜,

由瑞典的 Oskar Pernefeldt 设计。

和我一起想象一下:

如果我们庆祝我们的人性

庆祝我们的民族一样多,会怎么样?

当我们成为一个航天文明
并进入星际时,

当你站在
火星或任何其他星球的表面时,我们的国家意味着什么?

然后当然,回到地球上,

因为我们的星球正面临气候危机,

因为我们的气候在
我们的子孙后代的一生中可能无法居住,

我相信我们需要一个强大的象征,一面旗帜,

让我们团结起来战斗,

而不是 就像国家一样,

但作为一个物种。

谢谢你。

(掌声)