Overcoming the scientific divide Aaron Reedy

When I look at science education,

I see a divide.

I see a divide between

doing science

and learning science.

And now if you’re a kid
in that system of education,

and you want to do science,

you want to do authentic research,

you may have to wait a long time for that

because the first moment

in our system of science education

where we universally expect
students to do science

often doesn’t come until graduate school.

And this is what sets up the divide.

It sets up a divide
between teachers and scientists,

and it sets up a divide in general

between learning science
and doing science.

But I think we can overcome this divide

if teachers and scientists work together.

And I think teachers
are uniquely positioned

to reach out to scientists

and make this happen.

In my own classroom,

I’ve had some success with this model.

And so I’d like to use my own experiences

to kind of illustrate

how an individual teacher
can reach out to scientists

and make more science
happen in their classrooms.

I had the opportunity to develop

my own professional development program

in the summer through an organization

called Fund for Teachers.

The way they work is they’re kind of like

venture capitalists for educators.

You go to them with an idea and you say,

‘Hey, this is going to make
me a better teacher.

This is going to help my students learn.’

And if they like your idea
and they’re able,

they fund it, and they make
that idea happen for you.

So, the idea that I pitched to them

was an idea that would get
me doing more science

because that was important to me.

But it was also important to me

that I do it in such a way

that it would capture
the imagination of my students.

So, the idea that I pitched to them

was a thousand-mile expedition
on the Mississippi River

to gather data on nutrient pollution.

And for 27 days that summer,

I was immersed in the process
of doing science

on one of the mightiest
rivers on the planet.

When we would come ashore,

after paddling six to ten hours a day,

we would set up a temporary lab,

and we’d conduct water tests.

In prepping for this,

I quickly realized
how poorly my own education

had prepared me to do science

of this nature and of this scope.

So, what I did was I reached
out to experts.

I just simply looked through journals,

and I found who was the leading experts

in nutrient pollution in major rivers,

and I started firing
off emails with questions.

And I was astounded
at the responses I got.

Scientists responded thoroughly,

and they were genuinely interested

in helping me do better science.

So, I kind of put that information
in my back pocket

that professional
scientists were a resource

that I could draw from.

When I went back
to my classroom in the fall,

my students were able
to use the same methods

that I had learned in the summer

on a river in their own back
yard, the Chicago River,

to do real science.

And I could see this
breakdown of the barrier

between doing science
and learning science,

and it was happening in my classroom,

and I wanted more of it.

So, the next summer, I reached
out to scientists again.

And I pretty quickly came across

an evolutionary ecology lab at Iowa State.

And they shared my philosophy

that there should be no separation

between doing science
and learning science.

They worked on turtle reproduction,

specifically how climate change

affects the evolution of turtle
reproductive behavior,

and they worked on an island
in the Mississippi River.

So, I was thrilled again to be out

on the river for another summer.

But, because they shared
my believes on education,

we were able to bring high
school students out there

for two weeks at a time

and turn them loose

on their own authentic research projects

on the biology of turtles,

snakes,

lizards.

And, in that experience,

working side by side with people

at all different stages
of their academic career,

we had the high school students
working beside undergrads,

working beside graduate students,

working beside professionals.

I left that experience
absolutely convinced

that this is the right
way to teach science,

with no separation between doing science

and learning science.

I continued to keep up my relationships

with these scientists,

and I got to the point where
I wanted to try something new,

something that hadn’t been done before.

I wanted to bring those kinds
of science experiences

that we were having
with kids out at the river,

and I wanted to put those
into our classroom.

And it was important to me

that it wasn’t simply a one-off

or a one-day special field trip.

I wanted this kind of science

to be a part of the everyday
science curriculum

for an entire school year.

So, as we were thinking of this,

in planning for how we could
make this happen realistically,

we reached out to the National
Science Foundation,

and we applied to a Research
Experience for Teachers grant,

or the RET.

And now, teachers have to partner

with a researcher who is already
supported by the NSF

to apply for this grant,

but I think that just gives
you one more great excuse

to partner with a scientist.

And what we did is we used our NSF funding

to travel down to Florida,

with the permission of the state Florida

catch a bunch of lizards,

and FedEx them back
to my classroom in Chicago

where we had set-up
a functioning, live animal lab.

So, when my students came to school

for the first day in September,

they immediately began work
on a scientific experiment

that would answer a very
specific question.

Our question was,

“How do females make choices
when they lay eggs?

How do they choose a nest site?

And what effect does that choice
have on their offspring?”

And, by the end of the year,

they had generated data

and performed science
that answered that question.

And I was extremely happy

when our work was recently published

in the January edition
of Behavioral Ecology.

And, to my knowledge,
this is the first time

that work conducted as part

of a normal high school curriculum

resulted in a peer-reviewed paper.

So, I have three pieces of advice

for teachers who want
to make these connections

with scientists and want to blur the line

between doing science
and learning science.

Number 1,

look out for those great
resources that are out there.

Apply for an RET grant,

apply for a Fund for Teachers fellowship.

I know what a difference
those resources can make.

And there’s more resources
available locally,

and you should look for those, too

because they can influence the amount

that you are able to accomplish.
I know that.

However, my number 2 piece of advice is

don’t let a lack of resources stop you

from making those connections
with professional science.

Reach out to a scientist today,

no matter what your resource level is.

You can start small.

Invite a scientist in for a talk.

Set up a Skype chat
between a scientist and their lab.

Then, maybe you can move up to

more large-scale project-based learning.

But, whatever you do,

make sure that you’re
forming these partnerships

with people who do science for a living.

And my third point acknowledges

some of the realities
that teachers are facing today.

I know that the pressure
of high-stakes testing

and the climate that creates

can make it feel almost
a little bit subversive

to deviate from the standard curriculum.

So, my final piece of advice is

be a bit subversive if you have to.

Make sure, though, that you
are doing science.

And I don’t mean be
confrontational when I say this

because that’s not productive.

But take the steps you need to

to blur those lines between doing science

and learning science for your students.

And I think you’ll find
that when people see

how engaged in learning your students are,

and you’re getting good results,

all your opposition
is just going to kind of

melt away from that,

and you’re going to turn
people into supporters.

So, I think that this
is the right way to teach science

where we’re teaching the doing of science.

And I think it’s important to do this also

because this is the way

that you would have wanted
to learn science as a kid,

and, more importantly,
I think this is the way

that you would want your kids
to be taught science.

And this is the highest standard

that you can hold yourself
to as a science educator.

So, good luck making those connections,

and go do some science!

Thank you.

当我看科学教育时,

我看到了分歧。

我看到了

做科学

和学习科学之间的鸿沟。

现在,如果你
是那个教育系统中的孩子

,你想做科学,

你想做真正的研究,

你可能需要等待很长时间,

因为

在我们的科学教育系统的第一个时刻

,我们 普遍期望
学生做科学

往往要到研究生院才来。

这就是造成分歧的原因。


在教师和科学家之间

建立了一个鸿沟,它在学习科学和从事科学之间建立了一个普遍的鸿沟

但我认为,

如果教师和科学家共同努力,我们可以克服这一鸿沟。

而且我认为教师

接触科学家

并实现这一目标方面具有独特的优势。

在我自己的课堂上,

我用这个模型取得了一些成功。

所以我想用我自己的经验

说明一位教师
如何接触科学家

,让更多的科学
发生在他们的课堂上。

今年夏天,我有机会通过一个

名为 Fund for Teachers 的组织制定自己的专业发展计划。

他们的工作方式有点像

教育工作者的风险投资家。

你带着一个想法去找他们,然后说,

‘嘿,这会让
我成为一个更好的老师。

这将帮助我的学生学习。

如果他们喜欢你的想法
并且他们有能力,

他们就会资助它,并
为你实现这个想法。

所以,我向他们

提出的想法是一个能让
我做更多科学的想法,

因为这对我很重要。

但对我来说

,以能够激发学生想象力的方式来做这件事对我来说也很重要

所以,我向他们提出的想法是在密西西比河上

进行一千英里的探险

以收集有关营养污染的数据。

那年夏天的 27 天里,

我沉浸在在地球

上最强大的河流之一上做科学的过程中

当我们上岸时,

每天划船六到十个小时后,

我们会建立一个临时实验室

,我们会进行水测试。

在为此做准备时,

我很快意识到
我自己的教育

对我从事

这种性质和这种范围的科学的准备是多么糟糕。

所以,我所做的就是联系
专家。

我只是简单地翻阅期刊

,我发现谁是

主要河流营养污染方面的领先专家

,我开始
发送带有问题的电子邮件。

我对收到的回复感到震惊。

科学家们做出了彻底的回应

,他们真的

很想帮助我做更好的科学。

所以,我把这些信息
放在我的口袋里

,专业
科学家

是我可以借鉴的资源。


我在秋天回到教室时,

我的学生们
能够使用

我在夏天

在他们自己后院的一条河流上学到的相同方法
,芝加哥河

,做真正的科学。

我可以看到

做科学
和学习科学之间的障碍

被打破了,它发生在我的课堂上

,我想要更多。

所以,第二年夏天,我
再次联系了科学家。

我很快就遇到

了爱荷华州的一个进化生态实验室。

他们分享了我的理念

,即

做科学
和学习科学之间不应该分开。

他们致力于海龟繁殖,

特别是气候变化

如何影响海龟
繁殖行为的进化

,他们在密西西比河的一个岛屿上工作

所以,我很高兴再次

在河上度过另一个夏天。

但是,因为他们和
我一样相信教育,

我们能够一次带
高中生去

那里两周

,让

他们自由地从事自己

关于海龟、

蛇、

蜥蜴生物学的真实研究项目。

而且,在那次经历中,

处于学术生涯各个不同阶段
的人们并肩工作,

我们让高中生
与本科生

一起工作,与研究生

一起工作,与专业人士一起工作。

离开那次经历后,我
绝对

相信这是
教授科学的正确方法,做科学和学习科学

之间没有区别

我继续保持

与这些科学家的关系

,我到了
想要尝试新事物的地步,

一些以前没有人做过的事情。

我想把

我们
和孩子们在河边的那种科学体验带到外面

,我想把它们
带到我们的教室里。

对我来说重要的是

,这不仅仅是一次

或一日的特殊实地考察。

我希望这种

科学成为整个学年日常
科学课程

的一部分。

因此,当我们考虑到这一点时,

在计划如何
实现这一点时,

我们联系了美国国家
科学基金会,

并申请
了教师研究经验补助金

或 RET。

现在,教师必须

与已经获得 NSF 支持的研究人员合作

才能申请这项资助,

但我认为这只是给
你一个

与科学家合作的更好的借口。

我们所做的是,我们使用 NSF 的资金

前往佛罗里达州,在

佛罗里达州的许可下,

抓到了一群蜥蜴,

然后用联邦快递把它们
送回我在芝加哥的教室,在

那里我们建立了
一个运作良好的活体动物实验室 .

因此,当我的学生

在 9 月的第一天来到学校时,

他们立即开始
进行一项科学实验

,以回答一个非常
具体的问题。

我们的问题是,

“雌性
在产卵时如何做出选择

?它们如何选择巢址

?这种选择
对它们的后代有什么影响?”

而且,到今年年底,

他们已经生成了数据

并进行
了回答这个问题的科学。

当我们的工作最近发表


Behavioral Ecology 的 1 月版上时,我感到非常高兴。

而且,据我所知,
这是

作为普通高中课程的一部分进行的工作第一次

产生同行评审的论文。

因此,

对于希望

与科学家建立联系并希望模糊

从事科学
和学习科学之间界限的教师,我有三条建议。

第 1 点,

留意那些巨大的
资源。

申请 RET 补助金,

申请教师奖学金。

我知道
这些资源可以带来多大的改变。

而且当地有更多可用资源

,您也应该寻找这些资源,

因为它们会

影响您能够完成的数量。
我知道。

然而,我的第二条建议是

不要让缺乏资源阻止你

与专业科学建立联系。

立即联系科学家,

无论您的资源水平如何。

你可以从小处着手。

邀请一位科学家来演讲。

在科学家和他们的实验室之间建立 Skype 聊天。

然后,也许你可以升级到

更大规模的基于项目的学习。

但是,无论您做什么,请

确保您正在

与以科学为生的人建立这些伙伴关系。

我的第三点

承认教师今天面临的一些现实。

我知道,
高风险考试的压力

和由此产生的氛围会让

偏离标准课程的感觉几乎有点颠覆性。

所以,我的最后一条建议是,

如果必须的话,可以有点颠覆性。

不过,请确保您
正在从事科学工作。

当我说这句话时,我并不是说要对抗,

因为那没有效率。

但是采取你需要的步骤

来模糊

为你的学生做科学和学习科学之间的界限。

我想你会发现
,当人们看到

你的学生对学习的投入程度,

并且你取得了不错的成绩时,

你所有的反对意见
都会

烟消云散

,你会把
人们变成 支持者。

所以,我认为这
是教授科学的正确方法,

而我们正在教授如何做科学。

我认为这样做也很重要,

因为这是


小时候想要学习科学的方式

,更重要的是,
我认为这

是你希望
孩子学习科学的方式。

这是

您作为科学教育者可以坚持的最高标准。

所以,祝你建立这些联系好运

,去做一些科学吧!

谢谢你。