The human stories behind mass incarceration Eve Abrams

I have never been arrested,

never spent a night in jail,

never had a loved one
thrown into the back of a squad car

or behind bars,

or be at the mercy of a scary,
confusing system

that at best sees them with indifference,

and at worst as monstrous.

The United States of America locks up
more people than any other nation

on the planet,

and Louisiana is our biggest incarcerator.

Most of you are probably like me –

lucky.

The closest we get to crime and punishment
is likely what we see on TV.

While making “Unprisoned,”

I met a woman who used to be like us –

Sheila Phipps.

(Recording) Sheila Phipps:
Before my son went to jail,

I used to see people be on television,

fighting, saying, “Oh, this person
didn’t do it and this person is innocent.”

And you know, you snub them
or you dismiss them,

and like, “Yeah, whatever.”

Don’t get me wrong,

there’s a lot of people
who deserve to be in prison.

There’s a lot of criminals out here.

But there are a lot of innocent
people that’s in jail.

EA: Sheila’s son, McKinley,
is one of those innocent people.

He served 17 years of a 30-year sentence
on a manslaughter charge.

He had no previous convictions,

there was no forensic
evidence in the case.

He was convicted solely
on the basis of eyewitness testimony,

and decades of research have shown

that eyewitness testimony
isn’t as reliable

as we once believed it to be.

Scientists say that memory isn’t precise.

It’s less like playing back a video,

and more like putting together a puzzle.

Since 1989, when DNA testing
was first used to free innocent people,

over 70 percent of overturned convictions
were based on eyewitness testimony.

Last year,

the district attorney whose office
prosecuted McKinley’s case

was convicted of unrelated
corruption charges.

When this district attorney
of 30 years stepped down,

the eyewitnesses
from McKinley’s case came forward

and said that they had been pressured
into testifying by the district attorneys,

pressure which included
the threat of jail time.

Despite this, McKinley is still in prison.

(Recording) SP: Before this happened,

I never would’ve thought it.

And well, I guess it’s hard
for me to imagine

that these things is going on, you know,

until this happened to my son.

It really opened my eyes.

It really, really opened my eyes.

I ain’t gonna lie to you.

EA: Estimates of how many innocent
people are locked up

range between one and four percent,

which maybe doesn’t sound like a lot,

except that it amounts
to around 87,000 people:

mothers, fathers, sons locked up,

often for decades,

for crimes they did not commit.

And that’s not even counting
the roughly half a million people

who have been convicted of nothing –

those presumed innocent,

but who are too poor to bail out of jail

and therefore sit behind bars
for weeks upon months,

waiting for their case to come to trial –

or much more likely,

waiting to take a plea just to get out.

All of those people
have family on the outside.

(Recording) Kortney Williams: My brother
missed my high school graduation

because the night before,

he went to jail.

My brother missed my birthday dinner

because that day, actually,
he went to jail.

My brother missed his own birthday dinner

because he was in the wrong place
at the wrong time.

(Recording) EA: So all these times
when he ended up going to jail,

were charges pressed
or did he just get taken to jail?

KW: The charges would be pressed

and it would have a bond posted,

then the charges will get dropped …

because there was no evidence.

EA: I met Kortney Williams
when I went to her college classroom

to talk about “Unprisoned.”

She ended up interviewing her aunt,
Troylynn Robertson,

for an episode.

(Recording) KW: With everything
that you went through

with your children,

what is any advice that you would give me

if I had any kids?

(Recording) Troylynn Roberston:
I would tell you when you have them,

you know the first thing
that will initially come to mind is love

and protection,

but I would tell you,

even much with the protection
to raise them

with knowledge of the judicial system –

you know, we always tell our kids
about the boogeyman,

the bad people, who to watch out for,

but we don’t teach them
how to watch out for the judicial system.

EA: Because of the way
our criminal legal system

disproportionately targets
people of color,

it’s not uncommon for young people
like Kortney to know about it.

When I started going into high schools
to talk to students about “Unprisoned,”

I found that roughly one-third
of the young people I spoke with

had a loved one behind bars.

(Recording) Girl: The hardest part
is like finding out where he’s at,

or like, when his court date is.

Girl: Yeah, he went to jail
on my first birthday.

Girl: My dad works as a guard.

He saw my uncle in jail.

He’s in there for life.

EA: According to the Annie E.
Casey Foundation,

the number of young people with a father
incarcerated rose 500 percent

between 1980 and 2000.

Over five million of today’s children
will see a parent incarcerated

at some point in their childhoods.

But this number disproportionately
affects African American children.

By the time they reach the age of 14,

one in four black children
will see their dad go off to prison.

That’s compared to a rate
of one in 30 for white children.

One key factor determining the future
success of both inmates and their children

is whether they can maintain ties
during the parent’s incarceration,

but prisoners' phone calls home
can cost 20 to 30 times more

than regular phone calls,

so many families
keep in touch through letters.

(Recording: Letter being unfolded)

Anissa Christmas: Dear big brother,

I’m making that big 16 this year, LOL.

Guess I’m not a baby anymore.

You still taking me to prom?

I really miss you.

You’re the only guy
that kept it real with me.

I wish you were here so I can vent to you.

So much has happened since
the last time I seen you.

(Voice breaking up) I have some good news.

I won first place in the science fair.

I’m a geek.

We’re going to regionals,
can’t you believe it?

High school is going by super fast.

In less than two years,

I hope you’ll be able to see me
walk across the stage.

I thought to write to you
because I know it’s boring in there.

I want to put a smile on your face.

Anissa wrote these letters to her brother

when she was a sophomore in high school.

She keeps the letters he writes to her
tucked into the frame

of her bedroom mirror,

and reads them over and over again.

I’d like to think
that there’s a good reason

why Anissa’s brother is locked up.

We all want the wheels of justice
to properly turn,

but we’re coming to understand

that the lofty ideals we learned
in school look really different

in our nation’s prisons
and jails and courtrooms.

(Recording) Danny Engelberg: You walk
into that courtroom and you’re just –

I’ve been doing this for a quite a while,
and it still catches your breath.

You’re like, “There are so many
people of color here,”

and yet I know that the city is not
made up of 90 percent African Americans,

so why is it that 90 percent
of the people who are in orange

are African American?

(Recording) EA: Public defender Danny
Engelberg isn’t the only one noticing

how many black people
are in municipal court –

or in any court.

It’s hard to miss.

Who’s sitting in court
waiting to see the judge?

What do they look like?

(Recording) Man: Mostly
African-Americans, like me.

Man: It’s mostly, I could say,
85 percent black.

That’s all you see in the orange,
in the box back there, who locked up.

Man: Who’s waiting? Mostly black.

I mean, there was a couple
of white people in there.

Woman: I think it was about
85 percent African-American

that was sitting there.

EA: How does a young black person
growing up in America today

come to understand justice?

Another “Unprisoned” story
was about a troupe of dancers

who choreographed a piece
called “Hoods Up,”

which they performed
in front of city council.

Dawonta White was in the seventh grade
for that performance.

(Recording) Dawonta White: We was wearing
black with hoodies because Trayvon Martin,

when he was wearing his hoodie,
he was killed.

So we looked upon that,

and we said we’re going to wear
hoodies like Trayvon Martin.

(Recording) EA: Who came up
with that idea?

DW: The group. We all agreed on it.

I was a little nervous,
but I had stick through it though,

but I felt like it was a good thing
so they could notice what we do.

(Recording) EA: Shraivell Brown
was another choreographer and dancer

in “Hoods Up.”

He says the police criticize
people who look like him.

He feels judged based on things
other black people may have done.

How would you want
the police to look at you,

and what would you want them to think?

SB: That I’m not no threat.

EA: Why would they think
you’re threatening?

What did you say, you’re 14?

SB: Yes, I’m 14, but because he said
a lot of black males

are thugs or gangsters and all that,

but I don’t want them thinking
that about me.

EA: For folks who look like me,

the easiest and most comfortable
thing to do is to not pay attention –

to assume our criminal
legal system is working.

But if it’s not our responsibility
to question those assumptions,

whose responsibility is it?

There’s a synagogue here that’s taken on
learning about mass incarceration,

and many congregants have concluded

that because mass incarceration
throws so many lives into chaos,

it actually creates more crime –

makes people less safe.

Congregant Teri Hunter says

the first step towards action
has to be understanding.

She says it’s crucial for all of us
to understand our connection to this issue

even if it’s not immediately obvious.

(Recording) Teri Hunter:
It’s on our shoulders

to make sure that we’re not
just closing that door

and saying, “Well, it’s not us.”

And I think as Jews, you know,
we’ve lived that history:

“It’s not us.”

And so if a society
closes their back on one section,

we’ve seen what happens.

And so it is our responsibility as Jews

and as members of this community

to educate our community –

at least our congregation –

to the extent that we’re able.

EA: I’ve been using
the pronouns “us” and “we”

because this is our criminal legal system

and our children.

We elect the district attorneys,

the judges and the legislators
who operate these systems

for we the people.

As a society,

we are more willing to risk
locking up innocent people

than we are to let guilty people go free.

We elect politicians
who fear being labeled “soft on crime,”

encouraging them to pass harsh legislation

and allocate enormous resources
toward locking people up.

When a crime is committed,

our hunger for swift retribution
has fed a police culture

bent on finding culprits fast,

often without adequate resources
to conduct thorough investigations

or strict scrutiny
of those investigations.

We don’t put checks on prosecutors.

Across the country,
over the last couple of decades,

as property and violent crimes
have both fell,

the number of prosecutors employed
and cases they have filed has risen.

Prosecutors decide
whether or not to take legal action

against the people police arrest

and they decide what charges to file,

directly impacting how much time
a defendant potentially faces behind bars.

One check we do have
on prosecutors is defense.

Imagine Lady Liberty:

the blindfolded woman holding the scale

meant to symbolize the balance
in our judicial system.

Unfortunately, that scale is tipped.

The majority of defendants in our country

are represented by
government-appointed attorneys.

These public defenders
receive around 30 percent less funding

than district attorneys do,

and they often have caseloads
far outnumbering

what the American Bar
Association recommends.

As Sheila Phipps said,

there are people who belong in prison,

but it’s hard to tell
the guilty from the innocent

when everyone’s outcomes are so similar.

We all want justice.

But with the process weighed
so heavily against defendants,

justice is hard to come by.

Our criminal legal system
operates for we the people.

If we don’t like what’s going on,

it is up to us to change it.

Thank you very much.

(Applause)

我从来没有被捕过,

从来没有在监狱里住过一晚,

从来没有让亲人
被扔进警车后座

或监狱里,

或者受制于一个可怕的、
令人困惑的系统

,充其量只是冷漠地看待他们,

并且 最坏的情况是可怕的。

美利坚合众国关押
的人比地球上任何其他国家都多

而路易斯安那州是我们最大的监狱。

你们中的大多数人可能和我一样——

很幸运。

我们最接近犯罪和惩罚
的可能是我们在电视上看到的。

在制作“Unprisoned”时,

我遇到了一位曾经和我们一样的女人

——Sheila Phipps。

(录音)希拉·菲普斯:
在我儿子入狱之前,

我曾经看到人们在电视上

打架,说:“哦,这个人
没有这样做,这个人是无辜的。”

你知道,你冷落他们
或解雇他们

,就像,“是的,随便。”

不要误会我的意思,

有很多
人应该坐牢。

这里有很多罪犯。

但是有很多无辜的
人在监狱里。

EA:希拉的儿子麦金莱
就是那些无辜的人之一。

他因过失杀人罪被判处 30 年徒刑 17
年。

他没有前科,案件

中没有法医
证据。

他仅仅
根据目击者的证词被定罪

,几十年的研究表明

,目击者的证词
并不

像我们曾经认为的那样可靠。

科学家说记忆并不精确。

它不像播放视频

,更像是拼图。

自 1989 年 DNA
检测首次用于释放无辜者以来,

超过 70% 的被推翻的定罪
是基于目击者的证词。

去年,

负责
起诉麦金莱案件的地方检察官

被判犯有无关的
腐败指控。

当这位工作
了 30 年的地方检察官下台时,麦金莱案

的目击者站

出来表示,他们是
受到地方检察官的压力而要求作证的,

压力包括
入狱的威胁。

尽管如此,麦金莱仍在狱中。

(录音) SP:在这发生之前,

我从来没有想过。

而且,我想
我很难

想象这些事情正在发生,你知道,

直到这件事发生在我儿子身上。

它真的让我大开眼界。

真的,真的让我大开眼界。

我不会骗你的。

EA:估计有多少无辜
者被

关押在 1% 到 4% 之间,

这听起来可能并不多,


大约有 87,000 人:

母亲、父亲、儿子被关押,

通常关押数十年

, 他们没有犯下的罪行。

这还不包括
大约 50 万

没有被判无罪的人——

那些被假定为无辜的人,

但他们太穷而无法从监狱中保释出来

,因此在监狱里
待了几周又几个月,

等待他们的案子出来。 审判——

或者更有可能的是,

等待认罪只是为了出去。

所有这些人
在外面都有家人。

(录音) Kortney Williams:我哥哥
错过了我的高中毕业典礼,

因为前一天晚上,

他进了监狱。

我的兄弟错过了我的生日晚餐,

因为那天,实际上,
他进了监狱。

我哥哥错过了自己的生日晚餐,

因为他在
错误的时间出现在了错误的地方。

(录音) EA:那么所有这些时候,
当他最终入狱时,

是被指控
还是只是被带进了监狱?

KW:指控会被追究

,并且会发布保证金,

然后指控会被撤销……

因为没有证据。

EA:
当我去她的大学

教室谈论“未入狱”时,我遇到了 Kortney Williams。

她最终采访了她的姨妈
特洛伊琳·罗伯逊 (Troylynn Robertson)

的一集。

(录音) KW:
你和孩子一起经历的一切,如果我

有孩子

,你会给我什么建议

(录音)Troylynn Roberston:
当你拥有它们时,我会告诉你,

你知道
最初会想到的第一件事是爱

和保护,

但我会告诉你,

即使

是在司法知识的情况下抚养他们的保护 系统——

你知道,我们总是告诉我们的孩子
关于妖怪

、坏人、要提防谁,

但我们不教他们
如何提防司法系统。

EA:由于
我们的刑事法律制度

不成比例地
针对有色人种的方式,

像科特尼这样的年轻人知道这一点并不少见。

当我开始上高中
与学生谈论“未入狱”时,

我发现
与我交谈的年轻人中大约有三分之一的人

在监狱里有一个爱人。

(录音)女孩:最难的部分
是找出他在哪里

,或者喜欢他的出庭日期。

女孩:是的,他
在我的第一个生日那天进了监狱。

女孩:我爸爸是一名警卫。

他在监狱里看到了我叔叔。

他一辈子都在里面。

EA:根据 Annie E.
Casey 基金会

的数据,1980 年至 2000 年间,父亲
被监禁的年轻人数量增加了 500%

如今,超过 500 万的孩子

在童年的某个时候看到父母被监禁。

但这个数字不成比例地
影响了非裔美国儿童。

到 14 岁时,

四分之一的黑人孩子
会看到他们的父亲入狱。

相比之下
,白人儿童的比例为 30 分之一。

决定
囚犯及其子女未来成功的一个关键因素

是他们能否
在父母被监禁期间保持联系,

但囚犯打电话回家
的费用可能

是普通电话的 20 至 30 倍,

因此许多家庭
通过信件保持联系 .

(录音:正在展开的信)

Anissa Christmas:亲爱

的大哥,我今年要满 16 岁了,哈哈。

我想我不再是婴儿了。

你还带我去参加舞会?

我很想你。

你是唯一一个
对我保持真实的人。

我希望你在这里,所以我可以向你发泄。

自从我上次见到你以来,发生了很多事情。

(声音中断)我有一个好消息。

我在科学博览会上获得了第一名。

我是个极客。

我们要去地区赛,
你不相信吗?

高中过得特别快。

在不到两年的时间里,

我希望你能看到我
走过舞台。

我想写信给你,
因为我知道那里很无聊。

我想在你的脸上露出微笑。

安妮莎

在高中二年级时给她哥哥写了这些信。

她把他写给她的信
藏在

卧室镜子的镜框里,

一遍又一遍地阅读。

我想

安妮莎的兄弟被关起来是有充分理由的。

我们都希望正义的车轮
能够正常转动,

但我们逐渐明白

,我们在学校学到的崇高理想

在我们国家的监狱
、监狱和法庭上看起来确实不同。

(录音) Danny Engelberg:你
走进那个法庭,你只是——

我已经这样做了很长一段时间了
,它仍然让你喘不过气来。

你会说,“这里有这么
多有色人种”

,但我知道这座城市不是
由 90% 的非裔美国人组成,

那么为什么 90%
的橙色人

都是非裔美国人 ?

(录音) EA:公设辩护人丹尼·英
格伯格并不是唯一一个注意到有

多少
黑人在市法院——

或任何法院中的人。

很难错过。

谁坐在法庭上
等着见法官?

他们看起来怎么样?

(录音)男人:主要是
非洲裔美国人,比如我。

男:我可以说大部分是
85% 的黑人。

这就是你在橘子里看到的一切,
在后面的盒子里,谁被锁起来了。

男:谁在等? 多为黑色。

我的意思是,那里有
几个白人。

女人:我认为大约
85% 的

非洲裔美国人坐在那里。

EA:
今天在美国长大的年轻黑人

是如何理解正义的?

另一个“未入狱”的故事
是关于一群

舞者编排了一部
名为“Hoods Up”的作品

,他们
在市议会面前表演。

Dawonta White 在那次表演中上七
年级。

(录音) Dawonta White:我们穿着
黑色连帽衫,因为 Trayvon Martin

在穿着连帽衫
时被杀了。

所以我们考虑了这一点

,我们说我们要穿
像 Trayvon Martin 这样的连帽衫。

(录音) EA:这个主意是谁想出来
的?

大卫:这个团体。 我们都同意了。

我有点紧张,
但我坚持了下来,

但我觉得这是一件好事,
所以他们可以注意到我们的所作所为。

(录音) EA:Shraivell Brown

是“Hoods Up”中的另一位编舞和舞者。

他说警察批评
长得像他的人。

他觉得根据
其他黑人可能做过的事情来判断。


希望警察怎么看你

,你希望他们怎么想?

SB:我不是没有威胁。

EA:为什么他们会认为
你是在威胁?

你说什么,你14岁?

SB:是的,我今年 14 岁,但因为他
说很多黑人男性

都是暴徒或黑帮之类的,

但我不希望他们
这么想我。

EA:对于像我这样的人来说,

最简单、最舒服的
事情就是不去注意

——假设我们的刑事
法律体系正在运作。

但如果
质疑这些假设不是我们的责任,那

是谁的责任呢?

这里有一座犹太教堂,用于
了解大规模监禁

,许多会众得出结论

,因为大规模
监禁使许多人的生命陷入混乱,

它实际上创造了更多的犯罪——

使人们不那么安全。

会众泰瑞亨特说

,采取行动的第一步
必须是理解。

她说,对于我们所有人来说
,了解我们与这个问题的联系至关重要,

即使它不是立即显而易见的。

(录音) Teri Hunter:

我们有责任确保我们不
只是关上那扇门

然后说:“好吧,不是我们。”

我认为作为犹太人,你知道,
我们经历过这样的历史:

“这不是我们。”

因此,如果一个社会
对某个部分置之不理,

我们已经看到会发生什么。

因此,作为犹太人和这个社区的成员,我们有责任在我们能力范围

内教育我们的社区

——至少是我们的会众

EA:我一直
使用代词“我们”和“我们”,

因为这是我们的刑事法律制度

和我们的孩子。

我们选举为我们人民运行这些系统的地区检察官

、法官和立法者

作为一个社会,

我们更愿意冒险
关押无辜的人,而

不是让有罪的人获得自由。

我们选举
那些害怕被贴上“对犯罪软弱”标签的政客,

鼓励他们通过严厉的立法

并分配大量资源来
关押人们。

当犯罪发生时,

我们对迅速报复的渴望
助长了一种警察文化,他们

一心想要快速找到罪魁祸首,

往往没有足够的
资源进行彻底调查


对这些调查进行严格审查。

我们不检查检察官。


过去的几十年里,在全国范围内,

随着财产和暴力犯罪
的减少,

受雇的检察官人数
和他们提起的案件数量都在增加。

检察官决定
是否

对警察逮捕的人采取法律行动

,他们决定提出什么指控,

直接
影响被告可能面临的监禁时间。

我们
对检察官的一项检查是辩护。

想象一下自由女神:

那个拿着天平的蒙着眼睛的女人

,象征
着我们司法系统的平衡。

不幸的是,这个规模已经倾斜。

我国大部分被告人


政府指定的律师代理。

这些公设辩护人
获得的资金比地区检察官少约 30%

而且他们的案件量通常
远远

超过美国律师
协会的建议数量。

正如希拉·菲普斯(Sheila Phipps)所说,

有些人属于监狱,

但当每个人的结局如此相似时,就很难区分有罪与无罪。

我们都想要正义。

但是,由于这一过程
对被告的影响如此之大,

因此很难伸张正义。

我们的刑事法律制度
是为我们人民而运作的。

如果我们不喜欢正在发生的事情

,我们可以改变它。

非常感谢你。

(掌声)