What is a gift economy Alex Gendler

This holiday season,

people around the world will give
and receive presents.

You might even get
a knitted sweater from an aunt.

But what if instead of saying “thanks”
before consigning it to the closet,

the polite response expected from you

was to show up to her house
in a week with a better gift?

Or to vote for her in the town election?

Or let her adopt your firstborn child?

All of these things might not
sound so strange

if you are involved in a gift economy.

This phrase might seem contradictory.

After all, isn’t a gift given for free?

But in a gift economy,
gifts given without explicit conditions

are used to foster a system
of social ties and obligations.

While the market economies we know
are formed by relationships

between the things being traded,

a gift economy consists
of the relationships

between the people doing the trading.

Gift economies have existed
throughout human history.

The first studies of the concept

came from anthropologists
Bronislaw Malinowski and Marcel Mauss

who describe the natives
of the Trobriand islands

making dangerous canoe journeys
across miles of ocean

to exchange shell necklaces
and arm bands.

The items traded through this process,
known as the kula ring,

have no practical use,

but derive importance
from their original owners

and carry an obligation
to continue the exchange.

Other gift economies
may involve useful items,

such as the potlatch feast
of the Pacific Northwest,

where chiefs compete for prestige
by giving away livestock and blankets.

We might say that instead
of accumulating material wealth,

participants in a gift economy
use it to accumulate social wealth.

Though some instances of gift economies
may resemble barter,

the difference is that the original gift
is given without any preconditions

or haggling.

Instead, the social norm of reciprocity

obligates recipients to voluntarily
return the favor.

But the rules for how and when to do so
vary between cultures,

and the return on a gift
can take many forms.

A powerful chief giving
livestock to a poor man

may not expect goods in return,

but gains social prestige
at the debtor’s expense.

And among the Toraja people of Indonesia,

the status gained from gift ceremonies
even determines land ownership.

The key is to keep the gift cycle going,

with someone always
indebted to someone else.

Repaying a gift immediately,

or with something of exactly equal value,

may be read as ending
the social relationship.

So, are gift economies exclusive
to small-scale societies

outside the industrialized world?

Not quite.

For one thing, even in these cultures,

gift economies function alongside
a market system for other exchanges.

And when we think about it,

parts of our own societies
work in similar ways.

Communal spaces, such as Burning Man,

operate as a mix of barter
and a gift economy,

where selling things
for money is strictly taboo.

In art and technology,

gift economies are emerging
as an alternative to intellectual property

where artists,

musicians,

and open-source developers

distribute their creative works,
not for financial profit,

but to raise their social profile
or establish their community role.

And even potluck dinners
and holiday gift traditions

involve some degree
of reciprocity and social norms.

We might wonder if a gift is truly a gift

if it comes with obligations
or involves some social pay off.

But this is missing the point.

Our idea of a free gift
without social obligations

prevails only if we already think
of everything in market terms.

And in a commericalized world,

the idea of strengthening bonds
through giving and reciprocity

may not be such a bad thing,
wherever you may live.

这个假期,

世界各地的人们将赠送
和接受礼物。

你甚至可能会
从阿姨那里得到一件针织毛衣。

但是,如果您
在将其放入壁橱之前不要说“谢谢”,而是

希望您的礼貌

回应是
在一周内带着更好的礼物出现在她家中呢?

还是在镇选举中投票给她?

还是让她收养你的长子? 如果您参与礼品经济,

所有这些事情听起来可能并不
那么奇怪

这句话可能看起来自相矛盾。

毕竟,礼物不是免费送的吗?

但在礼物经济中,
没有明确条件的礼物

被用来培养
社会联系和义务体系。

虽然我们所知道的市场经济
是由

被交易的事物之间的关系形成的

,但礼物经济是由

进行交易的人之间的关系组成的。

礼物经济
在人类历史上一直存在。

这个概念的第一个研究

来自人类学家
Bronislaw Malinowski 和 Marcel Mauss

,他们描述
了 Trobriand 群岛的当地人

进行危险的独木舟之旅,
穿越数英里的海洋,

以交换贝壳项链
和臂带。

通过这个过程交易的物品,
被称为库拉戒指,

没有实际用途,

但从其原始所有者那里获得了重要性,


有义务继续交换。

其他礼物经济
可能涉及有用的物品,

例如太平洋西北部的聚餐盛宴

,酋长们
通过赠送牲畜和毯子来争夺声望。

我们可以说,礼物经济的参与者
不是积累物质财富,而是

用它来积累社会财富。

尽管礼物经济的某些实例
可能类似于易货交易

,但不同之处在于原始礼物
是在没有任何先决条件或讨价还价的情况下给予的

相反,互惠的社会规范

要求接受者自愿
回报。

但如何以及何时这样做的规则
因文化而异,

而且礼物的回报
可以有多种形式。

一个有权势的首领将
牲畜送给穷人,

可能不会期望得到回报,

而是
以牺牲债务人为代价获得社会声望。

在印度尼西亚的托拉哈人中,

通过礼物仪式获得的地位
甚至决定了土地所有权。

关键是要让礼物循环继续下去

,总是
有人欠别人的。

立即偿还礼物,

或以完全相同价值的东西,

可能被解读为
结束社会关系。

那么,礼物经济

是工业化世界以外的小规模社会所独有的吗?

不完全的。

一方面,即使在这些文化中,

礼品经济也与
其他交易的市场体系一起发挥作用。

当我们想到它时

,我们自己社会的某些部分
以类似的方式工作。

像火人节这样的公共空间

是易货贸易
和礼物经济的混合体

,卖东西
换钱是严格的禁忌。

在艺术和技术领域,

礼物经济正在
成为知识产权的替代品

,艺术家、

音乐家

和开源开发者

分发他们的创意作品,
不是为了经济利益,

而是为了提高他们的社会形象
或建立他们的社区角色。

甚至便餐
和节日礼物传统也

涉及某种程度
的互惠和社会规范。

如果礼物带有义务或涉及一些社会回报,我们可能会想知道它是否真的是礼物

但这没有抓住重点。

只有当我们已经
从市场角度考虑一切时,我们关于没有社会义务的免费礼物的想法才会盛行。

在一个商业化的世界里,通过给予和互惠

加强联系的想法

可能不是一件坏事,
无论你住在哪里。