hello everyone
i'm assuming that those of you listening
or watching have been through
some kind of formal schooling looking
back at your experience
you've probably had to work in groups
because as you may know
it is well established that students
learn a lot when interacting with their
peers
you might have also gone on a field trip
to help you better understand the
lessons you've been taught
like going to the forest when learning
about different ecosystems but then
covet 19 came along and threw away
everything we knew as best practice in
education
this is however not the first time an
interruption to education has happened
it has happened before
in different individual countries due to
natural disasters
protests war and other reasons
but this is the first time an
interruption to education happens
globally and without being able to
predict
when the interruption will be over
ministers of education
educators researchers students parents
and the public
worldwide looked at each other and said
well but now what but there it was
the magical solution distance learning
it might have been the only way for
education systems
to demonstrate resilience many were
skeptical about it at first
russians for example were not sure about
its effectiveness
it is suggested however that we must not
use the
we must not use the term distance
learning
to explain what education systems did
during the pandemic
but instead use emergency remote
education
because systems adopted this approach in
order to survive
with minimal losses possible you see
this is an important realization
education systems
were not aiming for ideal education
delivery
but rather they switched to survival
mode
now that educators know that emergency
remote education
is the way to move forward without
interrupting education delivery
for god knows how long education systems
worldwide help to figure out
how they'll implement emergency remote
education
the easiest way might have been online
websites and apps
with content available for self learning
and where virtual sessions take place
but we're not talking about a group of
students or a school
or even a group of schools or
universities
where you can track the needs of
students and respond accordingly
we're talking about nations moving from
face to face to online learning
almost overnight with all the
diversities present among its citizens
economically socially culturally etc
according to unicef out of the 127
countries with data
five methods were used for emergency
remote education
absent websites for live sessions or
self-learning
tv programs radio stations and
paper-based responses
with take-home packages in most cases
countries adopted more than one approach
to cater for the needs of
all students from different
socio-economic backgrounds
south korea for instance provided three
options for schools to choose two
or more from synchronous interactive
classes where students go online at a
specific time
to attend a class as synchronous
content-based classes
where the content is made available to
students to go through
at their own convenience or independent
assignments
where students are provided with tasks
to complete
independently some issues however were
raised
because of emergency remote education
and countries responded
quite differently to these issues i'll
talk about
four of these issues one the digital
divide
the problem is not new but the pandemic
broadened the gap and highlighted the
inequalities that were present
long before the era of covet 19.
not every student in the world has
access to the internet
tv radio or even electricity governments
responded differently to this issue
turkey china and india were among the
countries that subsidized the internet
to students who need it
on the other hand in addition to
subsidizing the internet connection
the government in south korea provided
rental devices
to students in need another approach was
providing students with radios
as in burkina faso or using telephone
connections to deliver tasks to students
as was done in russia two trauma
psychological pressure
and anxiety the pandemic and the
lockdown were pressuring to all of us
of all age groups through though to
different degrees
the education systems should have taken
this into consideration
some systems did for instance in china
the government established counselling
services to students
as well as a hotline that residents can
call for psychological support
and provided services to help fresh
graduates
find jobs on the other hand emergency
remote education applied in saudi arabia
relied heavily on students motivation
their self-learning skills
and their parents involvement by
providing
mainly asynchronous content this
added to the heavy psychological social
and emotional impact
of the pandemic on the parents and the
students
this brings us to the third issue the
emerging educational roles of parents
parents suddenly found themselves
responsible for their children's
education
in some countries such as saudi arabia
the parental role was essential
which not only was a heavy burden on
students and their parents
but also increased the inequalities
between students
depending on the availability of their
parents and whether or not
they have a full-time jobs of their own
as well as
their level of education and readiness
to tutor
this was also the reason that sets
unique challenges
for households with multiple children in
egypt
the last issue is that unique basic soft
and technical skills were necessary to
survive in a time of crisis
i remember spending the first 15 minutes
of a session
waiting for the professor to call the it
department
because she couldn't log in believe me
nobody knows the need
for these skills during the pandemic
better than the i.t people at
every institution teachers and students
were suddenly in need to gain
skills related to the use of technology
to continue teaching and learning
during the pandemic japan for instance a
country widely known for its technology
and advancement
lagged introducing technology into
schools and universities
and thus its teachers and students
lacked the essential skills to survive
during the pandemic
which led the government to postpone the
beginning of the new academic year
which usually starts in april instead of
implementing
emergency remote education it is worth
noting here that
remote learning should not be
face-to-face learning
done online although a lot of countries
reported facing this challenge
i'll give the example of india and
russia where teachers kept on teaching
the same way as they did
prior to the pandemic but instead of
standing in the classroom in front of
the students
they were now sitting in front of a
computer
this is what happened during the
pandemic what happens afterwards
what will the postcovid education system
look like
what are the lessons learned that will
help systems become
more resilient first of all we can't
really tell the effects of the
approaches
that the education systems adopted
during the pandemic
on students education just yet this is
an analysis
that has to wait a bit longer as for
whether education systems will
change after the pandemic is over here's
what we hope
happens one not back to business as
usual
the pandemic forced education systems to
take steps into the virtual world
which would have otherwise taken so much
time
we don't expect schools and universities
to turn 100
virtual as is the case currently but it
is expected
that blended learning approaches to
education will be adopted
and more online learning approaches
would be implemented
two a very important lesson to take from
the pandemic
is that we must fix the systems in favor
of those who have been facing
injustice within the education system
prior to go with 19 pandemic systems
should invest to reach marginalized and
vulnerable children
as previously mentioned the issue of
inequality was pre-existing
in the system and it was only
highlighted
during the pandemic in simple words the
system should now
resolve this issue they should invest in
the infrastructure of remote and rural
areas
they must provide equal access and
support
to students three each education system
should look at its own experience to
enhance its curriculum
teacher training structure or other
aspects of education
for instance because the curriculum in
egypt was
highly dependent on road memorization
students
and teachers found it hard to shift to
research and
project-based learning during the
pandemic
how will education systems prepare for
possible upcoming interruptions
in the systems the response to the
pandemic was different in different
countries and societies
but perhaps the most important lesson
here
is for systems to create a plan b
because this is what resilient systems
look like
they have the resources and the
knowledge that help them survive
when facing challenges and maybe after
all this is over we can give parents a
well-needed break
and get students to sleep in schools for
a couple of days
weeks maybe thank you
{{
大家
好,我假设你们这些听
或看的人已经接受过
某种正规教育,
回顾你们的经历,
你们可能不得不分组工作,
因为你们可能知道
,众所周知,学生在
学习时会学到很多东西 与他们的同龄人互动,
您可能还进行了实地考察,
以帮助您更好地理解所学的
课程,
例如在
了解不同的生态系统时去森林,但后来
covet 19 出现并抛弃
了我们作为最佳实践所知道的一切
然而,
在教育方面
,
由于
自然灾害、
抗议战争和其他原因
,这并不是第一次在不同的国家发生教育中断,但这是第一次在
全球范围内发生教育中断并且无法
预测
中断何时结束
教育部长 教育
工作者 研究人员 学生家长
和公共
世界 Wide 互相看了看,说得
很好,但现在是什么,但它
是神奇的解决方案 远程学习
它可能是
教育
系统展示弹性的唯一方法 许多人
起初对此持怀疑态度
,例如俄罗斯人不确定
它的
有效性 但是建议
我们不能使用远程学习这个术语
来解释教育系统
在大流行期间做了什么
,而是使用紧急远程
教育,
因为系统采用这种方法是
为了
以最小的损失生存下来,你看
这是一个 重要的实现
教育系统
的目标不是理想的教育
交付
,而是他们转向生存
模式,因为教育工作者知道紧急
远程教育
是在不
中断教育交付的情况下向前发展的方式,
因为上帝知道全球教育系统需要多长时间
才能帮助
弄清楚他们如何 将最容易实施紧急远程
教育
方式可能是在线
网站和应用程序,
其中包含可用于自学的内容
以及进行虚拟会议的地方,
但我们不是在谈论一组
学生或一所学校
,甚至不是一组
可以跟踪学生需求的学校或大学
根据联合国儿童基金会的数据,在有数据的 127 个国家中,有五种方法用于紧急远程教育,
但我们正在谈论的国家几乎在一夜之间从
面对面转向在线学习
,其公民在
经济社会文化等方面
存在所有多样性 直播课程或
自学
电视节目的网站 广播电台和
纸质回复
在大多数情况下,
国家采用了不止一种方法
来满足来自不同社会经济背景的所有学生的需求,
例如韩国提供 三个
选项让学校
从同步互动课程中选择两个或更多,
其中 学生在特定时间上网,
以同步
的基于
内容的课程的形式上课,在这些课程中,
学生可以
在自己方便的时候使用这些内容,或者在独立的
作业
中,为学生提供独立
完成的任务,
但是提出了一些问题,
因为 紧急远程教育
和国家
对这些问题的反应截然不同 我将
讨论其中
四个问题 一 数字
鸿沟
这个问题并不新鲜,但大流行
扩大了差距,并突出了
早在 covet 19 时代之前就存在的不平等 .
并非世界上每个学生
都能使用互联网
电视广播甚至电力 政府
对此问题的反应不同
土耳其 中国和印度是向需要
互联网的学生提供互联网补贴的国家之一
另一方面,除了
补贴互联网
连接 韩国政府向 stu 提供
租赁设备
另一种方法是
像在布基纳法索那样为学生提供收音机,或者像在俄罗斯那样使用电话
连接向学生交付任务
两种创伤
心理压力
和焦虑 流行病和
封锁给
我们所有年龄段的人带来压力 尽管
教育系统在不同程度上应该
考虑到这一点,但
有些系统确实如此,例如在
中国,政府为学生设立了咨询
服务,
并开通了居民可以拨打心理支持的热线电话,
并提供服务帮助应届
毕业生
找到工作。 另一方面,
在沙特阿拉伯应用的紧急远程教育在
很大程度上依赖于学生通过主要提供异步内容来激发
他们的自学技能
和父母的参与,
这
增加了大流行对父母和学生的严重心理社会
和情感影响
这给我们带来了 到第三期 t
父母的新兴教育角色 在沙特阿拉伯等一些国家,
父母突然发现自己
要为孩子的教育负责
他们的
父母以及
他们是否有自己的全职工作以及
他们的教育水平和
准备辅导
这也是埃及
有多个孩子的家庭面临独特挑战的原因
最后一个问题是独特的 基本的软
技能和技术技能是
在危机时期生存所必需的
我记得在课程的前 15 分钟
等待教授打电话给 IT
部门,
因为她无法登录相信我
没有人知道在
期间需要这些技能 大流行
比IT人在
每个机构的老师和
学生突然 需要获得
与使用技术相关的技能以
在大流行期间继续教学和学习日本例如,一个
以技术和进步而闻名的国家在
将技术引入
学校和大学时滞后
,因此其教师和学生
缺乏生存的基本技能
在
导致政府推迟
新学年开始的大流行期间
,通常在 4 月开始,而不是
实施
紧急远程教育,
在此值得注意的是,
远程学习不应该
是在线进行的面对面学习,尽管很多 一些国家
报告说面临这一挑战
电脑
这就是
大流行期间发生的事情 之后
会发生什么 postcov 会发生什么 id 教育系统
看起来有
哪些经验教训将
帮助系统变得
更有弹性首先我们无法
真正说出大流行期间
教育系统采用的方法
对学生教育的影响
大流行结束后教育系统是否会改变,
我们希望再等一会,我们希望
不会像
往常一样恢复正常
,大流行迫使教育系统
采取措施进入虚拟世界
,否则我们将花费很多
时间 不要指望学校和大学
会像目前那样变成 100 家
虚拟学校,但
预计
将采用混合式学习方法进行
教育,并将实施
更多的在线学习方法
,从大流行中吸取的一个非常重要的教训
是,我们 必须修复系统以
支持那些在教育系统中面临不公正的人,
然后再选择 19 如前所述,大流行系统
应投资以接触边缘化和
弱势儿童
不平等问题
在系统中早已存在,并且只是
在大流行期间简单地强调了
系统现在应该
解决这个问题 他们应该投资于
偏远地区的基础设施 和农村
地区,
他们必须为学生提供平等的机会和
支持
三每个教育系统
都应该考虑自己的经验,以
加强其课程
教师培训结构或
教育的其他方面,
例如,因为埃及的课程
高度依赖于
学生
和教师的道路记忆 发现
在
大流行
期间很难
转向研究和项目学习
创建一个计划 b
bec 因为这就是弹性系统的
样子,
他们拥有
帮助他们
在面临挑战时生存下来的资源和知识,也许在
这一切结束之后,我们可以给父母
一个急需的休息时间
,让学生在学校睡
几天
几周也许谢谢你