How teachers can help kids find their political voices Sydney Chaffee

To me, social justice is a simple concept.

It’s the notion
that all people in a society

deserve fair and equitable rights,
opportunities and access to resources.

But it’s become
controversial and nebulous,

because we’ve stopped talking

about what working
for social justice actually looks like.

Working for social justice
can look like this …

or this.

It can look like this …

or it can look like this …

or my favorite …

it can look like that.

Those are my students,

and whenever I’m asked to articulate
my work or my priorities as a teacher,

I explain that I believe education
can be a tool for social justice.

But a few months ago, I logged
onto Twitter – as I do –

and I saw that a fellow teacher
had taken issue with that belief.

“Teachers,” he said,
“should not be social justice warriors,

because the purpose
of education is to educate.”

And he ended his argument by saying,

“I teach my subject.”

But I reject that simplification,

because teachers
don’t just teach subjects,

we teach people.

When our students
walk into our classrooms,

they bring their identities with them.

Everything they experience in our rooms
is bound up in historical context,

and so if we insist that education
happens in a vacuum,

we do our students a disservice.

We teach them that education
doesn’t really matter,

because it’s not relevant
to what’s happening all around them.

And what’s happening all around them?

Well, racism for one.

According to results
of the Implicit Association Test,

fully 88 percent of white people harbored
subconscious biases against black people,

believing them to be less intelligent,
lazier and more dangerous than whites.

And that’s just one concrete example
of the insidious effects

of historic and systemic racism
on our country.

For more evidence,
we could look at incarceration rates;

we could look at statistics on police
violence against black people;

we could look at the opportunity
gap in education –

so yeah, social justice
belongs in our schools.

Social justice should be a part
of the mission of every school

and every teacher in America,

if we want “liberty and justice for all”
to be more than a slogan …

because schools are crucial places
for children to become active citizens

and to learn the skills and the tools
that they need to change the world.

So what are those skills?

OK, here’s a secret:

many of the skills that people need

to orchestrate the kinds of change
that will lead to justice

are already built
into the work of schools.

Things like problem-solving,

critical thinking,
collaboration, perseverance –

none of that should be
revolutionary on its own.

Combine that with the ability
to understand history

not as one static and objective narrative
on which we all agree,

but as a series of intertwined events

about which there can be
countless interpretations.

If we deliberately choose
to explore history with our students

rather than just teach it,

we help them understand
that history is ongoing

and that it’s connected
to current movements for justice.

And we help them see themselves
as potential players

within a living history.

So those are the skills I’m talking about

when I say that education can be a place

to help kids learn
how to work for justice.

But maybe the reason

that my Twitter critic
wasn’t happy with that idea

is because he doesn’t agree
with my definition of justice.

Fair enough.

Maybe he and I don’t see
eye to eye, politically.

But here’s the thing:

our aim is to encourage students
to articulate their own opinions,

not to coerce them into agreeing with us,

so it actually doesn’t matter
if he and I agree.

What matters is that we’re helping
students have those conversations

with each other.

And that means that as adults,

we need to learn how to become
effective facilitators

of our students' activism.

We’ve got to help them learn
how to have really tricky conversations,

we have to expose them
to different opinions,

and we have to help them see

how what they’re learning in school
connects to the world outside.

So here’s an example of that.

Every year, my students study
the history of apartheid in South Africa

as a case study of injustice.

Now for those of you who don’t know,

apartheid was a brutally racist system,

and the white-ruled government
in South Africa imposed racist laws

to oppress people of color,

and if you resisted those laws,
you risked jail time, violence or death.

And around the world,
other countries' governments,

including ours in the United States,

hesitated to sanction
South Africa, because …

well …

we benefited from its resources.

So in 1976, the South African
government passed a new law

which required that all students
in South Africa

learn in the language Afrikaans,

which was a white language,

and many black South Africans
referred to that language

as the language of the oppressor.

So not surprisingly,

students of color
were outraged at this law.

They already attended segregated schools

with overcrowded classrooms,

a lack of resources

and a frankly racist curriculum,

and now they were being told to learn

in a language neither they
nor their teachers spoke.

So on the morning of June 16, 1976,

thousands of kids
from the township of Soweto

walked out of schools.

And they marched peacefully
through the streets to protest the law.

At an intersection,
they met up with the police,

and when the kids refused to turn back,

the police officers set dogs on them …

and then they opened fire …

and the Soweto uprising ended in tragedy.

Apartheid itself didn’t end
until almost 20 years later,

but the activism of those kids
in Soweto profoundly changed

the way the world viewed
what was happening in South Africa.

News outlets all around the world
published this photo

of 13-year-old Hector Pieterson,

who was one of the first people
killed by police in Soweto,

and it became nearly impossible
to ignore the brutality

of the apartheid regime.

In the months and the years
that followed the Soweto uprising,

more and more countries
exerted political and economic pressure

on the South African government
to end apartheid,

and it was largely due to the activism
of those kids in Soweto.

So every year my kids learn about this.

And invariably, they start
to draw connections

between those kids
in Soweto and themselves.

And they start to ask themselves

what kind of political power
and agency they have.

They ask themselves whether
there would ever be a reason

they would risk their lives

so that a future generation
could live in a more just world.

And most profoundly for me,
every single year,

they ask themselves whether adults
will ever listen to their voices.

A few years ago,

my principal got an anonymous email
from one of our students.

It informed him that the following day,

the students planned
to walk out of school.

This was in the wake
of Michael Brown’s death

in Ferguson, Missouri,

and the students were planning
to join a walkout and march

in support of the Black Lives
Matter movement.

So at this point,

the staff at the school
had a decision to make.

Would we use our authority and our power
to try to control the students

and prevent them from leaving,

or would we support them

as they put into practice
the principles of social justice

that we had taught them about
since the ninth-grade year?

So the next morning,
the kids left school en masse

and they gathered on the lawn.

And one of the seniors
jumped up on a picnic table

and went over safety expectations.

(Laughter)

And the younger kids
took it very seriously.

And as teachers and as staff we told them,

“OK, be safe,”

and we watched as they marched off.

The kids who chose to stay
spent that afternoon in class.

They debated the merits of protest,

they talked about the history
of the Black Lives Matter movement,

and they went on
with classes as scheduled.

And those who chose to leave
participated in a citywide student walkout

and raised their collective
voice for justice.

But no matter where they chose
to spend the afternoon,

our kids learned
valuable lessons that day.

They learned that the adults
in their lives would support them

even as we worried for their safety.

And they learned that they didn’t need us
to tell them how or when

or even why to protest.

They learned that they were members
of a community of young people

with a shared vision
of a more equitable society,

and they learned that they had power
within that society.

They learned that events
like the Soweto uprising

are not ancient history,

and they don’t have to end in tragedy.

And that’s what education as a tool
for social justice can look like.

And here’s the thing:

our kids are ready for this kind of work.

So in 2015,

incoming college freshmen were surveyed,

and 8.5 percent of them said

that there was a “very good chance”
they would participate in a protest

sometime during their college career.

That might not seem very impressive,

but consider the fact

that it’s the largest number
of students to say that since 1967.

And 75 percent of those kids

said that helping other people
who are having difficulty

was a “very important”
or “essential” goal for them.

Again, the highest number of people
to say that since the late 1960s.

And research shows us that working
for justice doesn’t just follow

from building all those skills
I talked about earlier –

it actually goes the other way, too.

So working for justice,
engaging in activism,

helps students build skills
like leadership and critical thinking,

and it correlates positively
with their political participation

and their civic engagement

and their commitment
to their communities later in life.

So in other words,

students are telling us
that social justice matters to them

and researchers are telling us
that it helps students learn.

So now it’s up to us to listen,

and that might not be easy.

In 1976, one of those kids
who participated in the Soweto uprising,

he said that that event
represented divorce

between black children and their families,

because their families
had grown up under apartheid,

and they knew how dangerous
it was to speak out.

They wanted their kids
to lay low and stay safe.

And when our kids threatened to walk out,

a lot of the adults in our community
were really conflicted, too.

Some of us worried that they might
encounter violence.

Other people worried
that they would walk out

but they wouldn’t really know
why they were protesting.

And some, including
some students' families,

were really angry
that the school hadn’t done more

to prevent them from leaving.

And all of those fears that adults have
about getting this stuff wrong –

all of those fears make total sense.

But despite those fears,

we have got to prove to our students
that we will listen to their voices

and that they do have the power
to effect change.

It’s our responsibility
to equip our students

with the tools and the skills
that they need

to insist on a more equitable world –

and then sometimes,
to get out of their way,

and let them apply those skills
to things that they care about.

Living up to that vision
is going to require

that we are flexible,

and it’s going to require
that we’re creative.

It’s going to require
that we’re brave enough

to stand up in the face of people
who try to silence

or delegitimize dissenting voices.

And hardest of all,

it’s going to require accepting the fact
that sometimes we will be the ones

our students will rebel against.

(Laughter)

Sometimes they’re going to point out ways
in which systems that we have created,

or in which we are complicit,

contribute to inequity.

It’s going to be uncomfortable,
and it’s going to be painful

as they push us to question
our own assumptions and beliefs.

But what if we change the way we think
about rebellion in our kids?

When our kids rebel –

when they thoughtfully push back
against our ideas

or the way that we do things,

what if we chose to see that as a sign
that we’re doing something right

and that they’re becoming liberated?

I know it would be easier

if their critical thinking skills
manifested in more convenient ways –

on their essays
or their standardized tests –

I get it –

but convenience and justice
do not often go hand in hand.

And when our kids learn to think
critically about the world around them,

they become the kinds of engaged citizens

who will recognize and question
injustice when they see it

and work to do something about it.

Welcoming rebellion into our schools
is going to require some rethinking

about what teaching
and learning look like,

because there’s this misconception

that if we give students any wiggle room,
they’re going to walk all over us

and classrooms and dinner tables
will devolve into total chaos.

And if we expect kids to sit silently
and passively receive knowledge from us,

then their voices will always
feel overwhelming.

But if we accept instead
that learning is sometimes messy,

that it requires opportunities
to brainstorm and mess up

and try again,

that our kids dislike chaos
and want to learn

when they come to school,

then we can set up schools
to facilitate that kind of learning.

So do me a favor and close
your eyes for a second

and imagine schools
where teachers are thought partners,

letting students grapple
with complex, hard issues

and not necessarily giving them
the right answers.

And imagine schools
where we let students make choices –

we trust them enough to do that

and we let them experience
the consequences of those choices.

Imagine schools where
we let students be humans,

with all of the messiness
and the uncertainty

that is bound to come with that.

Whatever you just imagined,

it’s not mythical,

it’s not unrealistically idealistic,

because teachers all over the country
are already pushing the boundaries

of what teaching
and learning can look like

with amazing results for kids.

They’re doing that
in all kinds of schools,

and there are countless models
for teachers who want to get better

at helping students learn
in a way that’s more authentic

and engaging and empowering.

I was a reading a book recently,

it’s called “The Students Are Watching,”

and it was by Ted and Nancy Sizer,

and in that book, they said
that the work of education

is often described as a series of nouns,

like “respect,” “honesty,” “integrity.”

And they say those nouns
sound really impressive,

but often, they fail
to actually mean anything in practice.

But verbs, they say, are “active,

no less demanding

but requiring constant engagement.

Verbs are not structures
but, rather, engines.”

And so as I read that, I wondered:

How do we make justice into an engine
driving our work as teachers?

What’s the verb form of justice?

I think there might be an answer
to be found in the words of Cornel West,

who famously said that “justice
is what love looks like in public.”

And all of my nerdy English
teachers in the crowd

know that love can be a noun and a verb.

School has to be bigger.

It has to mean more
than “I teach my subject.”

School has to be about teaching people

to change the world for the better.

If we believe that,

then teaching will always be
a political act.

We can’t be afraid of our students' power.

Their power will help them
make tomorrow better.

But before they can do that,

we have to give them chances
to practice today.

And that practice
should start in our schools.

Thank you very much.

(Applause)

对我来说,社会正义是一个简单的概念。

社会中的所有人

都应享有公平公正的权利、
机会和获取资源的权利。

但它变得
有争议和模糊,

因为我们已经停止谈论

为社会正义工作的实际样子。

为社会正义而工作
可能看起来像这样……

或者这样。

它可以看起来像这样……或者看起来像这样……

或者我最喜欢的……

它看起来像那样。

这些是我的学生

,每当我被要求阐明
我的工作或作为教师的优先事项时,

我解释说我相信教育
可以成为社会正义的工具。

但是几个月前,我登录了
推特——就像我一样

——我看到一位老师
对这种信念提出了质疑。

“教师,”他说,
“不应该是社会正义的战士,

因为教育的目的
是教育。”

他以

“我教我的学科”结束了他的论点。

但我拒绝这种简化,

因为老师
不只是教科目,

我们教人。

当我们的学生
走进我们的教室时,

他们会带着他们的身份。

他们在我们房间里所经历的一切都
与历史背景息息相关

,因此,如果我们坚持教育是
在真空中进行的,

我们就会对学生造成伤害。

我们告诉他们,教育
并不重要,

因为它与
他们周围发生的事情无关。

他们周围发生了什么?

好吧,一个人的种族主义。

根据
内隐联想测试的结果,

88% 的白人
对黑人存在潜意识偏见,

认为他们不如白人聪明、
懒惰和危险。

这只是

历史性和系统性种族主义
对我们国家的阴险影响的一个具体例子。

如需更多证据,
我们可以查看监禁率;

我们可以看看警察
对黑人施暴的统计数据;

我们可以看看教育中的机会
差距

——是的,社会正义
属于我们的学校。

社会正义应该成为美国
每所学校

和每一位教师使命的一部分,

如果我们希望“人人享有自由和正义
”不仅仅是一个口号……

因为学校
是儿童成为积极公民

和 学习
改变世界所需的技能和工具。

那么这些技能是什么?

好的,这是一个秘密:

人们需要的许多技能

来协调
将导致正义

的各种变化已经
融入学校的工作中。

诸如解决问题、

批判性思维、
协作、毅力之类的事情——

这些都不应该是
革命性的。

将其与理解历史的能力相结合,

不是我们都同意的一种静态和客观的
叙述,

而是一系列相互交织的事件,

关于这些事件可以有
无数种解释。

如果我们故意选择
与学生一起探索历史,

而不是仅仅教授它,

我们会帮助他们
了解历史是持续的

,并且它
与当前的正义运动有关。

我们帮助他们将自己
视为

活生生的历史中的潜在参与者。

所以

当我说教育可以

成为帮助孩子们学习
如何为正义工作的地方时,这些就是我所说的技能。

但也许

我的推特批评
者对这个想法不满意的原因

是因为他不
同意我对正义的定义。

很公平。

也许他和我在
政治上意见不一致。

但事情是这样的:

我们的目的是鼓励
学生表达自己的观点,

而不是强迫他们同意我们的观点,

所以
他和我是否同意实际上并不重要。

重要的是我们正在帮助
学生彼此进行这些对话

这意味着作为成年人,

我们需要学习如何成为

学生积极行动的有效促进者。

我们必须帮助他们学习
如何进行真正棘手的对话,

我们必须让他们
接受不同的意见

,我们必须帮助

他们了解他们在学校所学的内容如何
与外面的世界联系起来。

这是一个例子。

每年,我的学生都会研究
南非的种族隔离历史,

作为不公正的案例研究。

现在对于那些不知道的人来说,

种族隔离是一种残酷的种族主义制度

,南非的白人统治政府
实施了种族主义法律

来压迫有色人种

,如果你抵制这些法律,
你将面临入狱、暴力或 死亡。

在世界各地,
其他国家的政府,

包括我们在美国的政府,

对制裁
南非犹豫不决,因为……

嗯……

我们从它的资源中受益。

所以在 1976 年,南非
政府通过了一项新的法律

,要求所有在南非的学生都必须

学习南非荷兰语,

这是一种白人语言

,许多南非黑人
将这种语言

称为压迫者的语言。

所以毫不奇怪,

有色人种的学生对
这项法律感到愤怒。

他们已经就读

于教室拥挤

、缺乏资源

和坦率的种族主义课程的隔离学校

,现在他们被告知要用他们和老师都不会说

的语言学习

于是,1976 年 6 月 16 日上午,索韦托镇

数千名孩子

走出了学校。

他们和平
地走上街头抗议法律。

在一个十字路口,
他们遇到了警察

,当孩子们拒绝回头时

,警察用狗袭击他们……

然后他们开枪

……索韦托起义以悲剧告终。

种族隔离本身
直到近 20 年后才结束,

但索韦托这些孩子的激进主义
深刻地

改变了世界
看待南非正在发生的事情的方式。

世界各地的新闻媒体都
刊登了这张

13 岁的赫克托·皮特森 (Hector Pieterson) 的照片,


是索韦托最早被警察杀害的人之一

,几乎
不可能忽视

种族隔离政权的残暴。


索韦托起义之后的几个月和几年里,

越来越多的国家向南非政府
施加政治和经济压力

以结束种族隔离

,这在很大程度上是由于
索韦托那些孩子的激进主义。

所以每年我的孩子都知道这一点。

他们总是开始
在索韦托的

那些孩子
和他们自己之间建立联系。

他们开始问自己他们拥有

什么样的政治权力
和机构。

他们问自己

是否有理由冒着生命危险


下一代生活在一个更公正的世界里。

对我来说最深刻的是,
每一年,

他们都会问自己成年人是否
会倾听他们的声音。

几年前,

我的校长收到了一封
来自我们一位学生的匿名电子邮件。

它通知他,第二天

,学生们
计划走出学校。

这是在
迈克尔·布朗

在密苏里州弗格森去世之后

,学生们正
计划参加罢工和游行,

以支持“黑人的命也是
命”运动。

因此,在这一点上,

学校的工作人员
必须做出决定。

我们会使用我们的权威和权力
来试图控制学生

并阻止他们离开,

还是我们会支持他们将我们从九年级开始教给他们

的社会正义原则付诸实践

于是第二天早上
,孩子们集体离开学校

,聚集在草坪上。

其中一位老年人
跳到野餐桌上

,超出了安全预期。

(笑声

) 年幼的孩子
们非常认真地对待它。

作为教师和工作人员,我们告诉他们,

“好吧,注意安全”

,我们看着他们离开。

选择留下来的孩子们
那天下午在课堂上度过。

他们讨论了抗议的优点,

他们谈论
了黑人的命也是命运动的历史

,他们
按计划继续上课。

那些选择离开的人
参加了全市范围的学生罢工,

并集体
发出了正义的声音。

但无论他们选择在哪里
度过下午,

我们的孩子
那天都学到了宝贵的经验。

他们了解到,即使我们担心他们的安全
,他们生活中的成年人也会支持他们

他们了解到,他们不需要
我们告诉他们如何、何时

甚至为什么抗议。

他们了解到他们
是一个年轻人社区的成员,他们

对更公平的社会有着共同的愿景,

并且他们了解到他们
在这个社会中拥有权力。

他们了解到,像索韦托起义这样的事件

并不是古老的历史

,也不必以悲剧收场。

这就是教育
作为社会正义工具的样子。

事情是这样的:

我们的孩子已经为这种工作做好了准备。

因此,在 2015 年,对

即将入学的大学新生进行了调查,

其中 8.5% 的人

表示他们“很有可能”

在大学生涯的某个时候参加抗议活动。

这似乎不是很令人印象深刻,

但考虑

到这是自 1967 年以来最多的学生这么说。

这些孩子中有 75%

表示帮助其他
有困难的人

是一个“非常重要”
或“基本”的目标 为他们。

再次,
自 1960 年代后期以来,最多的人这么说。

研究表明,
为正义而努力

不仅仅是建立
我之前谈到的所有这些技能——

它实际上也是相反的。

因此,为正义而努力,
参与激进主义,

帮助学生培养
领导力和批判性思维等技能

,这
与他们的政治参与

和公民参与

以及他们
在以后的生活中对社区的承诺呈正相关。

换句话说,

学生告诉
我们社会正义对他们很重要

,研究人员告诉
我们它可以帮助学生学习。

所以现在由我们来听听

,这可能并不容易。

1976 年,
参加索韦托起义的孩子之一,

他说那次事件
代表

了黑人孩子和他们的家人之间的离婚,

因为他们的家人
在种族隔离制度下长大

,他们知道
说出来是多么危险。

他们希望他们的孩子
保持低调并保持安全。

当我们的孩子威胁要出去时,

我们社区的很多成年人
也很矛盾。

我们中的一些人担心他们可能会
遇到暴力。

其他人
担心他们会走出去,

但他们真的不知道
他们为什么要抗议。

还有一些人,包括
一些学生的家人

,对学校没有

采取更多措施阻止他们离开感到非常愤怒。

以及成年人
对弄错这些东西的

所有恐惧——所有这些恐惧都是完全有道理的。

但尽管有这些恐惧,

我们必须向我们的学生
证明,我们会倾听他们的声音

,并且他们确实有
能力实现变革。

我们有责任
为我们的学生

提供他们需要的工具和技能

以坚持一个更公平的世界

——有时,
让他们摆脱困境

,让他们将这些技能应用
到他们关心的事情上。

实现这一
愿景将

需要我们灵活

,这将
需要我们有创造力。

这将
要求我们有足够的勇气

面对
那些试图压制

或使不同意见合法化的人站出来。

最难的是,

这需要接受这样一个事实
,即有时我们会成为

学生反抗的对象。

(笑声)

有时他们会
指出我们创造的系统,

或者我们同谋的系统,

导致了不公平。

这会让人不舒服
,也会很痛苦,

因为它们会促使我们质疑
自己的假设和信念。

但是,如果我们改变对
孩子叛逆的看法呢?

当我们的孩子反抗时——

当他们深思熟虑地
反对我们的想法

或我们做事的方式时

,如果我们选择将其视为
我们正在做正确的事情

并且他们正在获得解放的标志呢?

我知道

如果他们的批判性思维能力
以更方便的方式表现出来会更容易——

在他们的论文
或标准化考试中——

我明白了——

但便利和正义
并不经常齐头并进。

当我们的孩子学会
批判性地思考他们周围的世界时,

他们就会成为那种敬业的公民


当他们看到不公正

并努力采取行动时,他们会认识到并质疑它。

欢迎叛乱进入我们的
学校将需要重新

思考教学
和学习的样子,

因为有一种误解

认为,如果我们给学生任何回旋的空间,
他们就会在我们身上走来走去

,教室和餐桌
将完全沦为 混乱。

如果我们期望孩子们静静地坐着
,被动地从我们这里接受知识,

那么他们的声音总是会
让人感到难以抗拒。

但如果我们接受
学习有时是混乱的

,需要有
机会集思广益,

搞砸再试一次

,我们的孩子不喜欢混乱
并想在上学

时学习,

那么我们可以建立学校
来促进这种学习。 学习。

所以,帮我一个忙,闭上
你的眼睛

,想象一下学校
,教师是思想伙伴,

让学生
解决复杂、棘手的问题

,但不一定给
他们正确的答案。

想象一下
我们让学生做出选择的学校——

我们足够信任他们这样做

,我们让他们体验
这些选择的后果。

想象一下
我们让学生成为人类的学校,

随之而来的所有混乱
和不确定性

无论您想象什么,

这都不是神话

,也不是不切实际的理想主义,

因为全国各地的教师已经在突破

教学
和学习的界限,并

为孩子们带来了惊人的成果。

他们在各种学校都这样做,

并且有无数
的教师模式可以

帮助学生
以更真实

、更有吸引力和更有能力的方式更好地帮助学生学习。

我最近在看一本书

,叫《学生们在看》

,是 Ted 和 Nancy Sizer 写的

,在那本书里,他们
说教育工作

经常被描述为一系列名词,

比如“尊重 ”、“诚实”、“正直”。

他们说这些名词
听起来确实令人印象深刻,

但在实践中,它们通常并
没有真正的意义。

但他们说,动词是“活跃的,

要求不低,

但需要不断参与。

动词不是结构
,而是引擎。”

所以当我读到这篇文章时,我想知道:

我们如何让正义成为
推动我们作为教师工作的引擎?

正义的动词形式是什么?

我想也许可以
从 Cornel West 的话中找到答案,他有句

名言“正义
就是爱在公共场合的样子”。 人群

中我所有的书呆子英语
老师都

知道爱既可以是名词也可以是动词。

学校必须更大。

它不仅仅意味着
“我教我的学科”。

学校必须教人们

让世界变得更美好。

如果我们相信这一点,

那么教学将永远是
一种政治行为。

我们不能害怕学生的力量。

他们的力量将帮助他们
让明天更美好。

但在他们能够做到这一点之前,

我们必须给他们
今天练习的机会。

这种做法
应该从我们的学校开始。

非常感谢你。

(掌声)