Modern Education Isnt Modern

[Applause]

modern education isn’t modern

this is what a car looked like 100 years

ago and this is what cars look like

today

this is what fashion looked like 100

years ago and this is what fashion looks

like today

this is one of the first ever computers

and these are what computers look like

today

now take a look at a classroom 100 years

ago

and take a look at a classroom today i

think that makes my point pretty clearly

most conventional educational models

haven’t changed significantly in over a

century

put simply modern education just isn’t

modern

now i think this is well put by stephen

king in a little quote of his

which eloquently underlines the need for

change sooner or rather than later

but in high school the business of

irrevocable choices began

doors slipped shut with a faint locking

click that was only heard clearly in the

dreams of later years

so i’ve broken it down into three main

sub issues

the wrong content is being taught it’s

being taught the wrong way and it’s

being tested the wrong way

now i’d like to quickly note that while

you may disagree with some of my ideas

on this topic i’m fairly hopeful

that at least one of these three pillars

so to speak may resonate with you and

indicate the change the need for change

in our educational systems

now firstly i think the content we’re

being taught is to an extent

not the right content and that’s for

various reasons

firstly there’s a lack of intrinsic

motivation in typical

conventional models to validate my ideas

i went ahead and spoke to

some of my own educators and i tried to

evaluate whether it was a legitimate

problem and to no surprise

they agreed that it was see most

conventional models follow an exam based

system

and because they’re so similar they have

similar detriments however

the finished school system is slightly

different and that they typically try to

spend the early education years

and building motivation and interest in

the subjects themselves

and this produces visible benefits as

can be seen when finnish schools

consistently perform above average in

numerous studies done by the program for

international student assessment or pisa

for short

done over the years they are

consistently performing above

average without exerting enormous

pressure on students or having excessive

exams

their system is known for being

particularly laid back and they give the

students the time

and resources to pursue their own

interests

rather than being overworked another

issue that i feel is often under

addressed is that sometimes the

relevancy of much of what we’re taught

could be questioned

there are some almost universally

applicable subjects that could be taught

but aren’t actually present in virtually

any curriculum

the best possible example of this is the

need for bureaucratic and financial

literacy

financial literacy is everything from

money management to doing taxes

and while not everyone may use history

in their career and others may never use

any of the arts

almost everyone is going to have to

eventually manage their money

and do their taxes this is evidently

lacking in school systems

just very recently this year the

organization for economic cooperation

and development

carried out a survey in partnership with

the previously mentioned program for

international student assessment pisa

where they engaged roughly 117 000 15

year olds across the globe

and found some fairly distressing

results while i won’t go into the

details of the report

i would recommend reading the short

summary if you find some time

funnily enough finland actually ranked

second on average

and that further backs my earlier point

about their more laid-back systems where

they focus on motivation

now personally however i feel the huge

lack of emphasis on soft skills is the

biggest fault in what isn’t being taught

in most conventional educational models

soft skills are a mix of intangible

skills like working well with people

having a good work ethic integrity

adaptability communication

problem solving etc and these soft

skills make you hugely invaluable to

employers

and are key to the success in the labor

market i went ahead and spoke

to the head of an apac outbound sales

team at google

and she told me a little bit about the

process of hiring people

and i quote her we look for the soft

skills

what people can do with their knowledge

makes them much more valuable

than the sheer volume of knowledge that

they actually have

this is best put by jack ma the way we

teach things

the things we teach today are going to

make our kids lose jobs in the next 30

years because all the things we learn

about

remembering knowledge calculations all

these machines can do better

a few years ago ibm actually carried out

a study investigating the most important

leadership qualities

and it was the largest sample of

one-on-one ceo interviews

involving over 1500 corporate heads and

public sector leaders

across 60 nations in 33 industries and

they found that creativity

was the most important leadership

quality amongst a series of other soft

skills

if the ibm study didn’t convince you the

world economic forum

wrote a report titled the future of jobs

back in 2016

where they attempted to evaluate the

most important qualities for employment

and they made their predictions for the

year 2020. in both lists they’re all key

soft skills often neglected in education

systems

the next big issue with our current

education i think is teaching the way

that we’re taught and this isn’t always

the educator’s fault as often

they can be forced to teach like this

due to the conditions of the system

one issue that i think is often

overlooked is the duration of class

marty lobdell a psychology professor

with over 40 years of experience did

a lecture on how long a student can

actually remain focused

and learning and he and he referenced

the study that found that

students can only typically retain new

information when doing an activity like

reading for example

during the first 25 to 30 minutes yet

despite this most schools have classes

that are 45 to 75 minutes long

next there’s the question of habit

formation students are often told to

revise to obtain good grades

practice specific habits to obtain

particular benefits

but this is a terribly inefficient way

of changing students behavior

as is noted by numerous psychologists

david ash the behavioral economist did a

ted talk

where he mentions there’s a fundamental

flaw in the way through which we try to

change people’s behavior

nearly everything and i quote is based

on the premise

that we behave rationally according to

him

everything is based on this premise if

you give me information i will process

that information in my head

and my behavior will change as a result

and he goes on to explain

how this is a false assumption this is

further backed again

by psychologist dan ariely who also did

a ted talk

on how to change people’s behavior and

he mentions giving information to people

is just not a good recipe to change

behavior yet we continue to give

information to students telling them to

revise to get better grades

or to practice a particular habit to

obtain a specific benefit

but that won’t change their behavior

better

research-backed practices should be

further investigated

and then implemented in system

furthermore in this day and age

information on virtually any subject has

become readily available through the

internet

tools like google quizlet and khan

academy have made this process

ever more efficient what this means is

that teachers roles as

educators must adapt accordingly to the

seismic shift and the availability of

information

i would even consider myself a case

study at this point

see i’ve taught myself programming and

i’ve managed to become a proper

front-end developer having worked on

real projects for

real companies in singapore and i

created a website for myself to generate

some credibility for myself which i

designed

using professional software all of which

i learn online

for absolutely no cost it’s not about

programming though because

at this day and age at this point in

time we can learn about virtually any

subject online for virtually no cost

i could spend my time learning more

professional skills like graphic design

and social media management or i could

go deeper into more academic subjects

like machine learning

and neurology the point here is that

there

is a huge availability of information on

the internet

and educators roles need to adapt to

this change and that hasn’t happened yet

i think most crucially and fundamentally

wrong though is that currently

testing is dictating the way that we

teach

the time spent in the classroom learning

exam technique is concerning and

unjustified and i think it should be the

other way around

what makes one successful is what they

can do with their knowledge

not the sheer volume of it and i touched

on this point earlier on

we should be taught how to think for

ourselves not what to think

using our brain as a processor not a

hard disk

moving on i think the way through which

students are tested is one of the most

largest

and recognized flaws in the system

personally i feel that it’s an

incredibly ineffective method

of measuring one’s capacities in most

orthodox exams

it doesn’t accurately reflect a

student’s intellectual capacity

nor their potential productivity in the

labor market it’s also been previously

noted by experts on the topic

that it may play a contributing role in

the disparity of performance between

genders

frederick j kelly was one of the

original inventors of standardized

testing in america

and that was a time when america had a

rapid influx of students and not enough

teachers so they had to pump out

students as fast as their industrial

assembly lines

he later went on to say that these tests

are too crude to be used and should be

abandoned

but it was too late and standardized

testing had been ingrained in western

education

sometimes these tests can be too

prescriptive

if you don’t write the word you don’t

get the mark other times it’s the other

way around and it’s too subjective to

the examiner’s moods and views

particularly in discussion based

subjects where answers are more

arbitrary

another issue is that exams are also

highly time pressured

which doesn’t always accurately reflect

the conditions

in the labor market i took a look at

some of the literature on this topic

and my findings consolidated my ideas

exam stress is toxic

one study took a look at the

particularly exam-centric

approach of the chinese schooling system

and it found that that approach can

stifle a student’s imagination

creativity and sense of self quality is

crucial

for a child’s ultimate success in and

out of the classroom

another study that i found took a look

at the relationship between test anxiety

and performance in set tests and it

found that test anxiety experienced by

students

may adversely affect the ability of

testing to measure the student’s

comprehension of course material

results support the relationship

hypothesized between test anxiety

and performance expectations at the time

of the final exam

these both further serve as testimonies

to my point

exam stress is toxic unfortunately i

believe that in most cases

educational models built around exams

end up in a toxic cycle of learn

test forget repeat looking forward

i think we need to come up with a

solution and implement it now

sadly i do recognize that most of these

issues are in the hands of the systems

themselves and outside of our immediate

reach

but i still think it’s important to

generate more dialogue around the issue

and more awareness perhaps schools

should pay more attention to student

learning types like auditory kinetic and

visual

because one size fits all just doesn’t

work perhaps school should also explore

more student-led learning

because it encourages students to build

their soft skills and it exhibits the

protege effect

which is essentially peer-to-peer

learning and that’s known to be an

incredibly effective method of both

learning and teaching

schools should help students pursue

their passions interests and curiosities

they should as much as possible provide

the means for students to do so

to explore out of their own genuine

interests

students should be inspired to learn and

pursue their dreams and curiosities and

passions rather than

maybe being made to fit into a mold

modern

education just isn’t modern and that

needs to change thank you

[掌声]

现代教育不现代

这是100

年前汽车的样子,

今天的汽车

是这样的,100

年前的时尚是

这样的,今天的时尚是这样的

这是第一个 曾经有电脑

,这些就是今天电脑

的样子 现在看看 100 年前

的教室,看看今天的教室

简单地说,现代教育并不

现代,

我认为斯蒂芬·金

在他的一小段引文中很好

地表达了这一点,这雄辩地强调了迟早要改变的必要性,

但在高中时,

不可撤销的选择的业务开始

关上了门 一个微弱的锁定

咔哒声,只有在晚年的梦中才能清楚地听到,

所以我将其分解为三个主要

问题 正在教授错误的内容 它

正在被教授 错误的方式,现在

正在以错误的方式进行测试

我想快速指出,虽然

您可能不同意我

在这个主题上的一些想法,但我相当希望

这三个支柱中的至少一个

可以产生共鸣 你并

指出

改变我们的教育系统

现在需要改变首先我认为我们

所教的内容在一定程度上

不是正确的内容,这是由于

各种原因

首先

在典型的

传统模型中缺乏内在动机来验证 我的想法

我继续和

我自己的一些教育工作者交谈,我试图

评估这是否是一个合理的

问题,毫不奇怪,

他们同意大多数

传统模型都遵循基于考试的

系统

,因为它们非常相似,所以它们 有

类似的弊端,

但是完成的学校系统略有

不同,他们通常会尝试

在早期教育中度过,

并建立对学科的动力和兴趣

这会产生明显的好处,

正如芬兰学校多年来在

国际学生评估计划或

短期比萨计划

所做的多项研究中始终表现高于平均水平时所看到的那样,它们的表现

始终高于

平均水平,而不会对学生施加巨大

压力或 过度

考试

他们的系统以

特别宽松而闻名,他们给

学生时间

和资源来追求自己的

兴趣,

而不是过度劳累另一个

我觉得经常没有得到

解决的问题是,有时

我们的大部分内容的相关性 教授

可能会受到质疑

有一些几乎普遍

适用的科目可以教授,

但实际上并没有出现在几乎

任何课程

中 最好的例子就是

需要官僚和金融

知识

金融知识是从

资金管理到税收

和 虽然不是每个人都可以使用 histo

在他们的职业生涯中,其他人可能永远不会使用

任何艺术

几乎每个人最终都将不得不

管理自己的钱

和纳税 就

今年最近

,经济合作

与发展组织

开展了一项

与前面提到的

国际学生评估比萨计划合作

进行的调查,他们在全球范围内吸引了大约 117 000 名 15

岁的孩子

,发现了一些相当令人痛苦的

结果,但我不会

详细介绍报告的细节,

我建议阅读简短

摘要 如果你发现一些

有趣的时间,芬兰实际上

平均排名第二

,这进一步支持了我之前

关于他们更悠闲的系统的观点,

他们现在个人专注于动力

但是我觉得

对软技能的极度缺乏重视是

最大的错误 大多数传统教育模式中没有教授的内容

软技能是无形的混合

与具有良好职业道德的人打交道等技能

正直

适应性 沟通

解决问题等这些软

技能使您对雇主非常宝贵,

并且是在劳动力市场上取得成功的关键

我继续与

亚太地区对外销售负责人进行了交谈

谷歌的团队

,她告诉我一些

关于招聘人员的过程

,我引用她的话,我们寻找

人们可以用他们的知识做的软技能,这

使得他们比

他们实际

拥有的大量知识更有价值 马云说得最好

我们教东西的方式 我们今天教的东西

会让我们的孩子在未来 30 年内丢掉工作

因为我们学到的所有

关于

记忆知识计算的东西 所有

这些机器

在几年前实际上可以做得更好 ibm 开展

了一项调查最重要的

领导素质的研究

,这是最大

的一对一 CEO 访谈样本,

涉及超过 1500 名员工

来自 60 个国家的 33 个行业的负责人和公共部门领导人,

他们发现,

如果 ibm 的研究没有让您信服,那么创造力是一系列其他软技能中最重要的领导素质

早在 2016 年的工作中

,他们试图评估

最重要的就业素质,

并对 2020 年做出了预测。

在这两个列表中,它们都是

教育系统中经常被忽视的关键软技能

我认为我们当前教育的下一个大问题 正在按照

我们的教学方式进行教学,这并不

总是教育者的错,因为由于系统的条件,

他们经常被迫这样教学

,我认为经常被

忽视的一个问题是上课的持续时间

marty lobdell 一位

拥有 40 多年经验的心理学教授做

了一次关于学生

实际上可以保持专注

和学习多长时间的讲座,他和他参考

了 研究发现,

学生通常只能

在前 25 到 30 分钟内进行阅读等活动时保留新信息,

尽管如此,大多数学校的课程

时长为 45 到 75 分钟,

接下来是学生习惯形成的问题

被告知要

修改以获得好成绩

练习特定的习惯以获得

特定的好处,

但正如许多心理学家所指出的那样,这是一种非常低效

的改变学生行为

的方法 行为经济学家大卫·阿什(david ash)在

ted 演讲

中提到

,这种方式存在根本缺陷 通过它我们试图

改变人们的行为

几乎所有事情我引用

的前提

是我们根据他的理性行事

一切都是基于这个前提如果

你给我信息我将

在我的脑海中处理这些信息

我的行为将改变为 结果

,他继续

解释这是一个错误的假设,这得到了

进一步的支持 再次

由心理学家丹·阿里利(dan ariely)发表,他也做

了一个

关于如何改变人们行为的TED演讲,

他提到向人们提供信息

并不是改变行为的好方法,

但我们继续

向学生提供信息,告诉他们

修改以获得更好的成绩

或 练习一个特定的习惯以

获得特定的好处,

但不会改变他们的行为

更好的

研究支持的做法应该被

进一步调查

,然后在系统中

进一步实施,并且

几乎任何主题的年龄信息

都可以通过互联网轻松获得

像 google quizlet 和 khan

academy 这样的工具使这个过程

变得更加高效这

意味着教师作为

教育者的角色必须相应地适应

巨大的变化和信息的可用性我什至认为自己

在这一点上是一个案例研究,

我已经 自学编程,

我已经成为一名合格的

前端开发人员

新加坡真实公司的真实项目,我

为自己创建了一个网站,为自己建立

一些可信度

随着时间的推移,我们几乎可以免费

在线学习任何主题

我可以花时间学习更多的

专业技能,比如平面设计

和社交媒体管理

互联网

上有大量信息可供使用,教育工作者的角色需要适应

这种变化,而这还没有发生,但

我认为最关键和根本

错误的是,目前的

测试决定了我们

教授课堂时间的方式 学习

考试技巧令人担忧且

不合理,我认为应该

反过来

一个人成功的原因是他们

可以用他们的知识做些什么,而

不是知识的数量,我

之前谈到了这一点,

我们应该被教导如何独立思考,

而不是

用我们的大脑作为处理器而不是

硬盘

移动来思考什么 我认为

测试学生的方式是

系统中最大和公认的缺陷之一,

我个人认为这是一种

在大多数正统考试中衡量一个人能力的非常无效的方法,

它不能准确反映

学生的智力能力,也不能准确反映学生的智力水平。

他们在

劳动力市场

上的潜在生产力 专家们之前也

指出,它可能

在性别之间的表现差异中发挥了重要作用

弗雷德里克·凯利是美国

标准化测试的最初发明者之一

,那是一个时代 当美国

学生迅速涌入而教师不足时

,他们不得不

像他们的行业一样快地抽出学生

他后来继续说,这些

测试太粗糙,无法使用,应该

放弃,

但为时已晚,标准化

测试已经在西方教育中根深蒂固,

有时如果你不写这些测试可能会过于

规范

其他时候你没有得到分数是

相反的,它对

考官的情绪和观点过于主观,

特别是在基于讨论的

主题中,答案更加

随意

另一个问题是考试也有

很大的时间压力

,这并不总是 准确反映

劳动力市场的状况 我查看了

一些关于这个主题的文献

,我的发现巩固了我的想法

考试压力是有害

的 这种方法会

扼杀学生的想象力、

创造力和自我品质感,这

对于孩子在内外取得最终成功

至关重要 课堂

我发现的另一项研究着眼

于考试焦虑

与设置测试中的表现之间的关系,它

发现学生经历的考试焦虑

可能会对

测试衡量学生

对课程材料结果的理解的能力产生不利影响,这

支持了假设的关系

在期末考试时的考试焦虑

和表现期望之间,

这两者都进一步证明

了我的观点

考试压力是有毒的不幸的是,我

相信在大多数情况下,

围绕考试

建立的教育模型最终会陷入学习

测试忘记重复寻找的有毒循环 向前

我认为我们现在需要提出一个

解决方案并实施它

遗憾的是,我确实认识到这些

问题中的大多数都掌握在系统本身的手中,

并且超出了我们的直接

范围,

但我仍然认为

围绕 问题

和更多的意识也许学校

应该更多地关注学生的

学习 像听觉动力学和视觉这样的类型,

因为一刀切是

行不通的,也许学校也应该探索

更多以学生为主导的学习,

因为它鼓励学生建立

他们的软技能,并表现出

本质上是对等的保护效应

学习,这是众所周知的一种

非常有效的

学习和教学方法

学校应该帮助学生追求

他们的激情 兴趣和好奇心

他们应该尽可能地

为学生提供这样做的手段

出于他们自己的真正兴趣进行探索

学生应该是 受到启发去学习和

追求他们的梦想、好奇心和

激情,而不是

被塑造成一种

现代

教育,这不是现代的,

需要改变谢谢