A 40year plan for energy Amory Lovins

[Music]

[Applause]

America’s public energy conversation

boils down to this question would you

rather die of a oil Wars or be climate

change or see nuclear holocaust or D all

of the above oh I missed one or e none

of the above that’s the one we’re not

normally offered what if we could make

energy do our work without working our

undoing

could we have fuel without fear could we

reinvent fire you see fire made us human

fossil fuels made us modern but now we

need a new fire that makes us safe

secure healthy and durable let’s see how

four-fifths of the world’s energy still

comes from burning each year four cubic

miles of the rotted remains of primeval

swamp goo those fossil fuels have built

our civilization they’ve created our

wealth they’ve enriched the lives of

billions but they also have rising costs

to our security economy health and

environment that are starting to erode

if not outweigh their benefits so we

need a new fire and switching from the

old fire to the new fire means changing

two big stories about oil and

electricity each of which puts two

fifths of the fossil carbon in the air

but they’re really quite distinct less

than 1% of our electricity is made from

oil although almost half is made from

coal their uses are quite concentrated

three-fourths of our oil fuels

transportation three-fourths of our

electricity powers buildings and the

rest of both runs factories so very

efficient vehicles buildings and

factories save oil and cold and also

natural gas that can displace both of

them but today’s energy system is not

just inefficient it is also in

disconnected aging dirty and insecure so

it needs refurbishment by 2050 though it

could become efficient connected

and distributed with elegantly frugal

autos factories and buildings all

relying on a modern secure and resilient

electricity system we can eliminate our

addiction to oil and coal by 2050 and

use one-third less natural gas while

switching to efficient use and renewable

supply this could cost by 2050 five

trillion dollars less in net present

value that is expressed as a lump sum

today then business as usual assuming

that carbon emissions and all other

hidden or external costs are worth zero

a conservatively low estimate yet this

cheaper energy system could support a

hundred fifty eight percent bigger u.s.

economy all without needing oil or coal

or for that matter nuclear energy

moreover this transition needs no new

inventions and no acts of Congress and

no new federal taxes mandate subsidies

or laws and running Washington gridlock

let me say that again I’m going to tell

you how to get the United States

completely off oil and coal five

trillion dollars cheaper with no act of

Congress led by business for profit in

other words we’re going to use our most

effective institutions private

enterprise Co evolving with civil

society and sped by military innovation

to go around our least effective

institutions and whether you care most

about profits and jobs and competitive

advantage or national security or

environmental stewardship and climate

protection and Public Health reinventing

fire makes sense and makes money General

Eisenhower reputedly said that enlarging

the boundaries of a tough problem makes

it soluble by encompassing more options

and more synergies so in reinventing

fire we integrated all four sectors that

use energy transportation buildings

industry and electricity and we

integrated four kinds of innovation not

just technology and policy but also

design and

business strategy those combinations

yield very much more than the sum of the

parts especially in creating deeply

disruptive business opportunities oil

costs our economy two billion dollars a

day plus another four billion dollars a

day in hidden economic and military

costs raising its total cost to over a

sixth of GDP our mobility fuel goes

three fifths to automobiles so let’s

start by making autos oil free

two-thirds of the energy it takes to

move a typical car is caused by its

weight and every unit of energy you save

at the wheels by taking out weight or

drag saves seven units at the tank is

you don’t have to waste six units

getting the energy to the wheels

unfortunately over the past quarter

century epidemic obesity has made our

two-ton steel cars gain weight twice as

fast as we have but today ultra light

ultra strong materials like carbon fiber

composites can make dramatic weight

savings snowball and can make cars

simpler and cheaper to build lighter and

more slippery autos need less force to

move them so their engines get smaller

indeed that sort of vehicle Fitness then

makes electric propulsion affordable

because the batteries or fuel cells also

get smaller and lighter and cheaper so

sticker prices will ultimately fall to

about the same as today while the

driving cost even from the start is very

much lower so these innovations together

can transform automakers from wringing

tiny savings out of Victorian engine and

steel stamping technologies to the

steeply falling costs of three linked

innovations that strongly reinforce each

other

namely ultralight materials making them

into structures and electric propulsion

the sails can grow and the prices fall

even faster with temporary fee baits

that is rebates for efficient new autos

paid for by fees on in

one’s and just in the first two years

the biggest of Europe’s five feeb eight

programs has tripled the speed of

improving automotive efficiency the

resulting shift to electric autos is

going to be as game-changing as shifting

from typewriters to the gains in

computers of course computers and

electronics are now America’s biggest

industry while typewriter makers have

vanished

so vehicle Fitness opens a new

automotive competitive strategy that can

double the oil savings over the next 40

years but then also make electrification

affordable and that displaces the rest

of the oil America could lead this next

automotive revolution currently the

leader is Germany last year Volkswagen

announced that by next year they’ll be

producing this carbon-fiber plug-in

hybrid getting 230 miles a gallon also

last year BMW announced this

carbon-fiber electric car they said that

its carbon fiber is paid for by needing

fewer batteries and they said we do not

intend to be a typewriter maker out he

claimed it’s going to beat them both by

year seven years ago and even faster and

cheaper American manufacturing

technology was used to make this little

carbon fiber test part which doubles as

a carbon cap in one minute and you can

tell from the sound how immensely stiff

and strong it is don’t worry about

dropping it it’s tougher than titanium

Tom Friedman actually who acted as hard

as he could with a sledgehammer without

even scuffing it but such manufacturing

techniques can scale to automotive speed

and cost with aerospace performance they

can save four-fifths of the capital

needed to make autos they can save lives

because this stuff can absorb up to 12

times as much crash energy per pound to

steel if we made our autos this way it

would save oil equivalent to finding one

and a half Saudi Arabia’s or half an

OPEC by drilling in the Detroit

formation a very perspective play and

all those

Detroit cost an average of 18 bucks a

barrel they are all American carbon free

and inexhaustible the same physics in

the same business logic also applied to

big vehicles in the five years ending at

2010 Walmart saved 60% of the fuel per

ton-mile in its giant fleet of heavy

trucks through better logistics and

design but just the technological

savings in heavy trucks can get to

two-thirds and combined with triple to

quintupled efficiency airplanes now on

the drawing board can save close to a

trillion dollars also today’s military

revolution in energy efficiency is going

to speed up all of these civilian

advances in much the same way that

military R&D has given us the Internet

the global positioning system and the

jet engine and microchip industries as

we design and build vehicles better we

can also use them smarter by harnessing

four powerful techniques for eliminating

needless driving instead of just seeing

the the travel grow we can use

innovative pricing charging for road

infrastructure by the mile not by the

gallon we can use some smart IT to

enhance transit and enable car sharing

and ride-sharing we can allow smart and

lucrative growth models that help people

already be near where they want to be so

they don’t need to go somewhere else and

we can use smart IT to make traffic

free-flowing

together those things can give us the

same or better access with 46 to 84

percent less driving saving another

point four trillion dollars plus 0.3

trillion dollars from using trucks more

productively so forty years hence when

you add it all up a far more mobile US

economy can use no oil saving or

displacing barrels for 25 bucks rather

than buying them for over 100 adds up to

a four trillion dollar net saving

counting all the hidden costs at zero so

to get mobility without oil to phase out

the oil we can get efficient and then

switch fuel

those hundred and twenty-five to 240

mile per gallon equivalent autos can use

any mixture of hydrogen fuel cells

electricity and advanced biofuels the

trucks and planes can realistically use

hydrogen or advanced biofuels the trucks

could even use natural gas but no

vehicles will need oil and the most

biofuel we might need just three million

barrels a day can be made 2/3 from waste

without displacing any cropland and

without harming soil or climate our team

speeds up these kinds of oil savings by

what we call institutional acupuncture

we figure out where the business logic

is congested and not flowing properly we

stick little needles in it to get it

flowing working with partners like Ford

and Walmart the Pentagon and the long

transition is already well underway in

fact three years ago mainstream analysts

were starting to see peak oil not in

supply but in demand and Deutsche Bank

even said world oil use could peek

around 2016

in other words oil is getting

uncompetitive even at low prices before

it becomes unavailable even at high

prices but the electrified vehicles

don’t need to burden the electricity

grid rather when smart autos exchange

electricity and information through

smart buildings with smart grids they’re

adding to the grid valuable flexibility

and storage that helped the grid

integrate varying solar solar and wind

power

so the electrified autos make the auto

and electricity problems easier to solve

together than separately and they also

converge the oil story with our second

big story saving electricity and then

making it differently and those twin

revolutions in electricity will bring to

that sector more numerous and profound

two diverse disruptions than any other

sector because we’ve got 21st century

technology and speed colliding head-on

with 20th and 19th century institutions

rules and cultures changing how we make

electricity gets easier if we need less

of it most of it now is wasted and the

technologies for saving

keep improving faster than we’re

installing them so the unbought

efficiency resource keeps getting ever

bigger and cheaper but as efficiency in

buildings in industry starts to grow

faster than the economy America’s

electricity use could actually shrink

even with the little extra use required

for those efficient electrified autos

and we can do this just by reasonably

accelerating existing trends over the

next 40 years buildings which use 3/4 of

the electricity can triple or quadruple

their energy productivity saving 1.4

trillion dollars net present value with

a 33 percent internal rate of return or

in English the savings are worth four

times what they cost an industry can

accelerate to doubling its energy

productivity with a 21 percent internal

rate of return

Nakia is a disruptive innovation that we

call integrative design that often makes

very big energy savings cost less than

small or no savings that is it can give

you expanding returns not diminishing

returns that is how our 2010 retrofit is

saving over two-fifths of the energy in

the Empire State Building

remanufacturing those six and a half

thousand windows on-site into Super

Windows that pass light but reflect heat

plus better lights and office equipment

and such cut the maximum cooling load by

a third and then renovating smaller

chillers instead of adding bigger ones

saved seventeen million dollars of

capital cost which helped pay for the

other improvements and reduce the

payback to just three years integrative

design can also increase energy savings

in industry dowas billion dollar

efficiency investment has already

returned nine billion dollars but

industry as a whole has another half

trillion dollars of energy still to save

for example three fifths of the world’s

electricity runs motors half of that

runs pumps and fans and those can all be

made more efficient and the motors

that turned them can have their system

efficiency roughly doubled by

integrating 35 improvements paying back

in about a year but first we ought to be

capturing bigger cheaper savings that

are normally ignored and are not in the

text books for example pumps the biggest

use of motors move liquid through pipes

but a standard industrial pumping loop

was redesigned to use at least 86

percent less energy not by getting

better pumps but just by replacing long

thin crooked pipes with fat short

straight pipes this is not about new

technology at just our rearranging our

metal furniture of course it also

shrinks the pumping equipment at its

capital costs so what does such savings

mean for the electricity that is 3/5

used in motors well from the coal burns

at the power plant through all these

compounding losses only a tenth of the

fuel energy actually ends up coming out

the pipe is float but now let’s turn

those compounding losses around

backwards and every unit of flow or

friction that we save in the pipe saves

10 units of fuel cost pollution and 100

levels cause global weirding back at the

power plant and of course as you go back

upstream the components get smaller and

therefore cheaper our team has lately

found such snowballing energy savings in

more than 30 billion dollars worth of

industrial redesigns everything from

data centers and chip fabs to mines and

refineries typically our retrofit design

and save about 30 to 60% of the energy

and payback in a few years while the new

facility design save 40 to 90 odd

percent with generally lower capital

cost now needing less electricity would

ease and speed the shift to new sources

of electricity chiefly renewables China

leads their explosive growth and their

plummeting cost in fact these solar

power module costs have just fallen off

the bottom of the chart and Germany now

has more solar workers than America has

Steelworkers already in about 20 states

private installers will come put those

cheap solar cells on your roof with no

money down and beat your utility bill

such unregulated products could

ultimately add up to a virtual utility

that bypasses your electric company just

as your cell phone bypass your wireline

phone company and the sort of thing

gives utility executives the

heebie-jeebies and it gives venture

capitalists sweet dreams in renewables

are no longer a fringe activity for each

of the past four years half of the

world’s new generating capacity has been

renewable mainly lately in developing

countries in 2010 renewables other than

big hydro particularly wind and solar

cells got a hundred and fifty 1 billion

dollars of private investment and they

actually surpassed the total installed

capacity of nuclear power in the world

by adding sixty billion watts in that

one year that happens to be the same

amount of solar cell capacity that the

world can now make every year a number

that goes up 60 or 70 percent a year

in contrast the net additions of nuclear

capacity and coal capacity in the orders

behind those keep fading because they

cost too much and they have too much

financial risk in fact in this country

no new nuclear power plant has been able

to raise any private construction

capital

despite seven years of hundred plus

percent subsidies so how else could we

replace the coal-fired power plants well

efficiency and gas can displace them all

at below just their operating costs and

combined with renewables can displace

them more than 23 times and less than

their replacement cost but we only need

to replace them once we’re often told

though that only : nuclear plants can

keep the lights on because they’re 24/7

whereas wind and solar power are

variable and hence supposedly unreliable

actually no generator is 24/7 they all

break and when a big plant goes down you

lose a thousand megawatts in

milliseconds often for weeks or months

often without warning

that is exactly why we’ve designed the

grid to backup failed plants with

working plants and in exactly the same

way the grid can handle window wind and

solar powers for castable variations our

early simulations show that largely or

wholly renewable grids can deliver

highly reliable power when they’re

forecasted integrated and diversified by

both type and location and that’s true

both for continental areas like the US

or Europe and for smaller areas embedded

within a larger grid that is how for

example for German States in 2010 were

43 to 52 percent when powered Portugal

was 45 percent renewable powered Denmark

36 and it’s how all of Europe can shift

to renewable electricity in America are

aging dirty and insecure power system

has to be replaced anyway by 2050 and

whatever we replace it with it’s got to

cost about the same about six trillion

dollars net present value whether we buy

more of what we’ve got or new nuclear

and so-called clean coal or renewables

that are or or less centralized but

those four futures at the same cost

differ profoundly in their risks around

national security fuel water finance

technology climate and health for

example our over centralized grid is

very vulnerable to cascading and

potentially economy shattering blackouts

caused by bad space weather or other

natural disasters or terrorist attack

but that blackout risk disappears and

all of the other risks are best managed

with distributed renewables organized

into local micro grids that normally

interconnect but can stand alone at need

that is they can disconnect fractally

and then reconnect seamlessly that

approach is exactly what the Pentagon is

adopting for its own power supply they

think they need that how about the rest

of us that they’re defending we want our

stuff to work too

and at about the same cost as

business-as-usual this would maximize

national security customer choice

entrepreneurial opportunity and

innovation together efficient use and

diverse dispersed renewable supply are

starting to transform the whole

electricity sector traditionally

utilities built a lot of giant : nuclear

plants and a bunch of big gas plants and

maybe a little bit of efficiency

renewables and those utilities were

rewarded as they still are in 34 states

for selling you more electricity however

especially where regulators are now

instead rewarding cutting your bills the

investments are shifting radically

toward efficiency demand response

cogeneration renewables and ways to knit

them all together reliably with less

transmission and little or no bulk

electricity storage so our energy future

is not fate but choice and that choice

is very flexible in 1976 for example

government and industry insisted that

the amount of energy needed to make a

dollar of GDP could never go down and I

heretic Lee suggested it could go down

several fold well that’s what’s actually

happened so far it’s fallen by half but

with today’s much better technologies

more mature delivery channels and

integrative design we can do far more

and even cheaper so to solve the energy

problem we just needed to enlarge it and

the results may at first seem incredible

but you know as Marshall McLuhan said

only puny secrets need protection big

discoveries are protected by public

incredulity now combine the electricity

in oil revolutions both driven by modern

efficiency and you get the really big

story reinventing fire

we’re business enabled and sped by smart

policies in mindful markets can lead the

United States completely off oil and

coal by 2050 saving 5 trillion dollars

growing the economy 2.6 fold

strengthening our national security oh

and by the way by getting rid of the oil

and coal reducing the fossil carbon

emissions

82 to 86 percent now if you like any of

those outcomes you can support

reinventing fire without needing to like

all of them and without needing to agree

about which of them is most important so

focusing on outcomes not motives can

turn gridlock and conflict into a

unifying solution to America’s energy

challenge this also turns out to be the

best way to cope with global challenges

climate change nuclear proliferation

energy insecurity energy poverty all of

which I’ll make us less safe now our

team at our my help smart companies to

get unstuck and speed this journey via

six sectoral initiatives with some more

hatching of course there’s still a lot

of old thinking out there to former

oilman Maurice strong said not all the

fossils are in the fuel but as Edgar

Willard who used to chair DuPont reminds

us in companies hampered by old thinking

won’t be a problem because he said they

simply won’t be around long term I’ve

described not just a once in a

civilization business opportunity but

one of the most profound transitions in

the history of our species we humans are

inventing a new fire not dug from below

but flowing from above not scarce but

bountiful not local but everywhere not

transient but permanent not costly but

free and but for a little transitional

tale of natural gas and a bit of biofuel

grown in ways that sustain and endure

this new fire is flameless efficiently

used it really can do our work without

working our undoing each of you owns a

piece of that five trillion dollar prize

and our new book reinventing fire

describes how you can capture it so with

the conversation just begun at

reinventing fire calm let me invite you

each to engage with us and with each

other and with everyone around you to

help make the world richer fairer cooler

and safer by together reinventing fire

thank you

[Applause]

[音乐]

[掌声]

美国的公共能源对话

归结为这个问题,你

宁愿死于石油战争,还是气候

变化,还是看到核浩劫,还是

以上所有 oh 我错过了一个,或者

以上都不是这个问题 我们

通常不会被提供如果我们可以让

能源在不工作的情况下完成我们的工作

我们是否可以拥有燃料而不必担心我们

是否可以重新发明火你看到火让我们人类

化石燃料让我们变得现代但现在我们

需要一种新的火来让我们 安全

可靠 健康 耐用 让我们看看

世界上五分之四的能源如何仍然

来自每年燃烧四立方

英里的原始沼泽腐烂的残骸

粘稠物 那些化石燃料建立

了我们的文明 他们创造了我们的

财富 他们丰富了我们 数十亿人的生命,

但他们也

给我们的安全经济健康和

环境带来了不断增加的成本,

如果不是超过他们的收益,这些成本就会开始受到侵蚀,因此我们

需要一场新的火灾,并从

旧火灾转向旧火灾 一场新的火灾意味着改变

关于石油和电力的两个大故事,

每个故事都将

五分之二的化石碳排放到空气中,

但它们确实截然不同

它们的使用非常集中

我们四分之三的石油燃料

运输 我们四分之三的

电力 电力建筑物

其余的都运行工厂 所以非常

高效的车辆建筑物和

工厂可以节省石油和冷气以及

可以取代两者的天然气,

但是 今天的能源系统

不仅效率低下,而且还处于

断开连接、老化肮脏和不安全的状态,因此

它需要到 2050 年进行翻新,尽管它

可以变得高效连接

和分布与优雅节俭的

汽车工厂和建筑物,所有这些都

依赖于我们可以消除的现代安全和弹性

电力系统

到 2050 年,我们对石油和煤炭的依赖,

减少三分之一的天然气使用量,同时

转向高效使用

到 2050 年,可再生能源供应的净现值可能会减少 5

万亿美元,

这在今天以一次性付款的形式表示,

然后一切照旧

假设碳排放和所有其他

隐藏或外部成本为零,这

是一个保守的低估计,但这种

更便宜的能源 系统可以支持

比我们大 158%

经济完全不需要石油或煤炭

或核能

此外,这种过渡不需要新的

发明,不需要国会的法案,

也不需要新的联邦税收授权补贴

或法律以及华盛顿的僵局

让我再说一遍,我要告诉

你 如何让美国

完全摆脱石油和煤炭的

成本降低 5 万亿美元,而不需要

由企业领导的国会法案以营利为目的,

换句话说,我们将利用我们最

有效的机构

私营企业与民间社会共同发展,

并通过军事创新加速

绕过我们效率最低的

机构,不管你最

关心的是利润、就业、竞争

优势还是国家安全、

环境管理、气候

保护和公共卫生,重新发明

火是有道理的,而且是赚钱的,

据说艾森豪威尔将军说,扩大

一个棘手问题的边界

通过包含更多选择

和更多协同作用使其可溶 发泄

火灾 我们整合了

使用能源 交通 建筑

工业和电力的所有四个部门,我们

整合了四种创新,不仅

是技术和政策,还包括

设计和

商业战略,这些组合

产生的收益远远超过各个部分的总和,

尤其是在创造深度

颠覆性方面 商机 石油

每天花费我们的经济 20 亿美元,加上每天另外 40 亿美元

的隐性经济和军事

成本,使其总成本超过

GDP 的六分之一 我们的移动燃料

用于汽车的五分之三 所以让我们

从让汽车无油开始

移动一辆典型汽车所需的三分之二的能量是由它的重量引起的

不幸的是,在过去的四分之一

世纪中,流行性肥胖使我们的

两吨钢车获得了动力

我们的速度是我们的两倍,但今天,

像碳纤维复合材料这样的超轻超强材料

可以显着减轻重量,

并且可以使汽车

更简单、更便宜地制造更轻、

更滑的汽车需要更少的力来

移动它们,因此它们的发动机确实变得更小

那种车辆 Fitness 然后

使电力推进变得负担得起,

因为电池或燃料电池也

变得更小、更轻、更便宜,因此

标价最终将下降到

与今天大致相同,而

驾驶成本甚至从一开始就

非常低,因此这些创新 在一起

可以将汽车制造商

从维多利亚时代的发动机和

钢冲压技术中节省的微薄

成本转变为三项相互关联的创新的成本急剧下降,这些

创新相互加强,

即超轻材料使其

成为结构和电力

推进,风帆可以增长,价格下降

得更快 临时费用诱饵

是 eff 的回扣 icient 新车

通过一次性付费

购买,仅在前

两年,欧洲五个feeb 8 项目中最大的一个

已经将

提高汽车效率的速度提高了两倍,

由此产生的向电动汽车

的转变将

与从 打字机到

计算机的收益当然计算机和

电子产品现在是美国最大的

产业,而打字机制造商已经

消失,

因此车辆健身开启了一项新的

汽车竞争战略,可以

在未来 40 年内将石油节省翻一番,

但同时也使电气化变得

负担得起并取代 剩下

的石油 美国可能引领下一场

汽车革命 目前

领先者是德国 去年大众汽车

宣布,到明年他们将

生产这种碳纤维插电式

混合动力车,每加仑行驶 230 英里

宝马也在去年宣布了这种

碳 - 纤维电动汽车,他们说它

的碳纤维是通过需要

更少的电池来支付的,他们 说我们不

打算成为打字机制造商,他

声称它会在

七年前击败他们,甚至更快、

更便宜的美国制造

技术被用来制造这个小的

碳纤维测试部件,它可以

兼作碳盖 分钟,你可以

从声音中看出它是多么的坚硬

和坚固,不要担心

它会掉下来它比钛金属

汤姆弗里德曼实际上更坚硬,他用大锤尽可能地用力

甚至没有磨损它,但这样的制造

技术可以扩展到 汽车速度

和成本与航空航天性能 他们

可以节省

制造汽车所需资金的五分之四 他们可以挽救生命,

因为如果我们以这种方式制造汽车,这种材料每磅钢铁可以吸收高达 12 倍的碰撞能量

通过在底特律

地层钻探,

节省石油相当于找到沙特阿拉伯的一个半或欧佩克的一半 价格为每桶 18 美元

它们都是美国无碳

且取之不尽用之不竭的 相同商业逻辑中的相同物理原理

也适用于

大型车辆 在截至 2010 年的五年中

沃尔玛

在其庞大的车队中每吨英里节省了 60% 的燃料 重型

卡车通过更好的物流和

设计,但仅

重型卡车的技术节省就可以达到

三分之二,再加

上现在在绘图板上的三倍到五倍的效率飞机

可以节省近一

万亿美元今天

的能源效率军事革命正在进行中

为了加速所有这些民用

进步,就像

军事研发为我们提供了

互联网全球定位系统以及

喷气发动机和微芯片行业一样,

我们更好地设计和制造车辆,我们

还可以通过利用

四种强大的技术更智能地使用它们 为了消除

不必要的驾驶,而不仅仅是

看到旅行的增长,我们可以

对道路基础设施使用创新的定价收费

以英里而非

加仑为单位的结构 我们可以使用一些智能 IT 来

增强交通并实现汽车

共享和拼车 我们可以允许智能且

有利可图的增长模式,帮助人们

已经在他们想去的地方附近,所以

他们不需要 去其他地方,

我们可以使用智能 IT 让交通

畅通无阻,这些东西可以为我们提供

相同或更好的访问,减少 46% 到 84

% 的驾驶,

节省 4 万亿美元,再加上 0.3

万亿美元更高效地使用卡车,

因此 四十年后,当

你把所有这些加起来时,一个更具流动性的美国

经济可以不使用石油储蓄或

以 25 美元的价格取代桶,而

不是花 100 美元购买它们,加上将

所有隐性成本计算为零,净节省了 4 万亿美元,所以

为了在没有油的情况下获得机动性 逐步

淘汰油,我们可以提高效率,然后

转换燃料

那些

相当于每加仑 125 到 240 英里的汽车可以使用

氢燃料电池的任何混合物 s

电力和先进的生物燃料

卡车和飞机实际上可以使用

氢或先进的生物燃料 卡车

甚至可以使用天然气,但没有

车辆需要石油,

我们可能需要的最多的生物燃料

每天只需 300 万桶 2/3 来自废物

在不取代任何农田

且不损害土壤或气候的情况下,我们的团队

通过我们所谓的机构针灸加快了这些石油的节省

我们找出业务逻辑在

哪里拥挤并且不能正常流动 我们在其中

插入小针以使其

流动 福特

和沃尔玛等

五角大楼的合作伙伴,

事实上三年前,主流

分析师开始看到石油的峰值不是

供应而是需求,德意志银行

甚至表示世界石油使用量可能会

在 2016

年左右出现

即使在低价下也变得没有竞争力,然后即使在高价下

也变得不可用,

但电动汽车却没有

' 不需要给电网增加负担,

而是当智能汽车

通过

智能建筑与智能电网交换电力和信息时,它们

为电网增加了宝贵的灵活性

和存储能力,帮助电网

整合了不同的太阳能和风能,

因此电动汽车使汽车成为可能

和电力问题一起解决比单独解决更容易

,它们也

将石油故事与我们的第二个大故事融合在一起,

节约电力,然后

以不同的方式解决电力问题,电力方面的双重

革命将给

该部门带来比任何其他部门更多、更深刻的

两种不同的破坏

因为我们拥有 21 世纪的

技术和速度,

与 20 世纪和 19 世纪的制度

规则和文化正面

碰撞

比我们

安装它们,所以未购买的

效率资源保持 getti ng 变得

更大更便宜,但随着

工业建筑的效率开始

超过经济增长速度,即使那些高效的电动汽车所需的额外使用很少,美国的

用电量实际上可能会减少

,我们可以通过合理加速现有趋势来做到这一点。

未来 40 年,使用

3/4 电力的建筑物可以将

其能源生产力提高三倍或四倍,节省 1.4

万亿美元的净现值

,内部收益率为 33%

以 21% 的内部

回报率将其能源生产力翻倍

Nakia 是一项颠覆性创新,我们

称之为集成设计,它通常可以使

非常大的能源节约成本低于

少量或没有节约,它可以为

您带来扩大回报而不是减少

回报 我们 2010 年的改造如何

为帝国大厦节省了五分之二以上的能源 将

现场六万五千扇窗户改造成

透光反热的超级窗户,

加上更好的照明和办公设备

,将最大冷负荷

减少三分之一,然后翻新更小的

冷水机而不是增加更大的冷水机,

节省了 1700 万 美元的

资本成本有助于支付

其他改进,并将

投资回收期缩短至仅三年 集成

设计还可以增加

工业节能 十亿美元的能

效投资已经

回报了 90 亿美元,但

整个工业还有 50

亿美元 能源仍需节省

例如,全球五分之三的

电力运行电机,其中一半

运行泵和风扇,这些都

可以提高效率,

通过

整合 35 项改进,它们的系统效率大约会提高一倍

。 一年,但首先我们应该

捕获更大更便宜的储蓄

通常被忽略且不在

教科书中的 gs 例如泵 电机的最大

用途是通过管道输送液体,

但重新设计了一个标准的工业泵送

回路,以减少至少 86

% 的能源,而不是通过获得

更好的泵,而只是通过更换长

细弯曲的管道和粗短的

直管 这

不仅仅是我们重新布置

金属家具时的新技术,当然它也会

以资本成本缩小泵送设备,

那么这样的节省

对于电机中使用的 3/5 电力意味着什么

从发电厂的煤炭燃烧

到所有这些

复合损失,实际上只有十分之一的

燃料能量最终

从管道中流出,但现在让我们把

这些复合损失

倒过来

,我们节省的每一个流量或摩擦单位 管道节省了

10 个单位的燃料成本污染和 100 个

水平在发电厂引起全球怪异

,当然当你回到

com 上游时 部件变得更小,

因此更便宜 我们的团队最近

发现,在

价值超过 300 亿美元的

工业重新设计

中节省了大量能源

并在几年内获得回报,而新

设施设计可节省 40% 至 90

% 的

成本,而且资本成本普遍较低 现在需要更少的电力将

缓解并加速向新

的电力来源(主要是可再生能源)的转变 中国

引领着它们的爆炸式增长和

直线下降的成本 这些太阳能

电池组件的成本刚刚从

图表的底部跌落,德国现在的

太阳能工人比美国还多

钢铁工人已经遍布大约 20 个州

此类不受监管的产品计费最终可能会

增加一个

绕过您的电子设备的虚拟实用程序 tric 公司

就像你的手机绕过你的有线

电话公司,这种事情

让公用事业主管们

兴奋不已,它给风险

投资家带来了可再生能源领域的美梦

不再

是过去四年中每年

世界一半的边缘活动 2010 年新的发电量

主要在

发展中国家是可再生的

一年中的 600 亿瓦,恰好与世界现在每年可以制造

的太阳能电池容量相同,这个

数字每年增长 60% 或 70%

这些背后的订单不断减少,因为它们

成本太高,而且

实际上在这个国家他们有太多的财务风险

尽管有七年

百分百的补贴,但没有一个新的核电站能够筹集任何私人建设资金,那么我们如何才能

取代燃煤电厂以及

效率和天然气能够

以低于其运营成本和

总和的价格取代它们 使用可再生能源可以取代

它们超过 23 倍,并且低于

其更换成本,但我们只需要

在我们经常被告知时更换它们

:核电站可以

保持灯亮,因为它们是 24/7,

而风能和太阳能 功率是

可变的,因此被认为是不可靠的,

实际上没有发电机是 24/7 他们都

坏了,当一个大工厂发生故障时,你

通常会在数周或数月内失去一千兆瓦的电量,通常会持续数周或数月

,这正是我们设计

电网的原因 备份失败的工厂与

工作工厂,并且以完全相同的

方式电网可以处理

用于浇注变化的窗口风能和太阳能我们的

早期模拟显示 在大部分或

全部可再生电网中,

当预测它们按类型和位置进行整合和多样化时,它们可以提供高度可靠的电力,

这对于美国

或欧洲等大陆地区以及嵌入

在更大电网中的较小地区都是如此,

例如 2010 年德国为

43% 至 52% 供电时 葡萄牙

为 45% 可再生能源供电 丹麦

36 这就是整个欧洲如何转向

可再生电力 美国正在

老化 肮脏和不安全的电力系统

无论如何都必须在 2050 年之前更换

取而代之的是,

无论我们购买

更多我们拥有的东西还是新的核能

和所谓的清洁煤或

集中或不集中的可再生能源,但是

这四种期货在 相同的成本

国家安全燃料水金融

技术气候和健康方面的风险差异很大,

例如我们过度集中的电网是

v 极易受到恶劣太空天气或其他自然灾害或恐怖袭击造成的级联和

可能破坏经济的停电的

影响,

但停电风险消失了,

所有其他风险最好

通过组织到本地微电网中的分布式可再生能源进行管理,这些

微电网通常

相互连接,但可以独立运行 在

需要时,他们可以分形断开连接

,然后无缝重新连接 这种

方法正是五角大楼

为其自己的电源采用的方法,他们

认为他们需要

我们其他人,他们正在捍卫我们希望我们的

东西也能正常

工作 与一切照旧的成本大致相同,

这将最大限度地提高

国家安全客户的选择

创业机会和

创新一起有效使用和

多样化分散的可再生能源供应

开始改变整个

电力部门传统上

公用事业公司建造了很多巨头:

核电站和 一堆大型天然气厂,

也许还有一点点 效率

可再生能源和这些公用事业公司获得了

回报,因为它们仍然在 34 个州

向您出售更多电力,但

尤其是在监管机构现在

反而奖励削减您的账单的情况下,

投资正在从根本上

转向效率需求响应

热电联产可再生能源以及将

它们可靠地结合在一起的方法 更少的

传输和很少或没有大容量

电力存储,所以我们的能源未来

不是命运而是选择,而且这种选择

在 1976 年非常灵活,例如,

政府和工业界坚持

认为创造一美元 GDP 所需的能源量

永远不会下降,我

异端李建议它可能会下降

几倍,这就是迄今为止实际

发生的情况,它下降了一半,但是

随着今天更好的技术

更成熟的交付渠道和

集成设计,我们可以做更多

甚至更便宜的事情来解决

我们刚刚需要的能源问题 放大它

,结果乍一看可能令人

难以置信 你知道,正如马歇尔麦克卢汉所说,

只有微不足道的秘密需要保护大

发现受到公众

怀疑的保护现在结合了

现代效率驱动的石油革命中的电力

,你得到了真正的大

故事,重新发明了

我们的业务,并通过明智的

政策加速 到 2050 年,在有意识的市场中可以带领

美国完全摆脱石油和

煤炭 节省 5 万亿美元

经济增长 2.6 倍

加强我们的国家安全 哦

,顺便说一句,通过摆脱石油

和煤炭,将化石碳

排放量减少

82% 到 86% 现在,如果你喜欢

这些结果中的任何一个,你就可以支持

重新发明火,而无需喜欢

所有这些结果,也无需

就其中哪个最重要达成一致,因此

专注于结果而不是动机可以

将僵局和冲突

变成美国能源的统一解决方案

挑战 这也被证明是

应对全球挑战的最佳方式

气候变化 核专家 生命周期

能源不安全 能源贫困 所有

这一切 我现在会让我们变得不那么安全 我们的

团队在我的帮助下 聪明的公司

通过六个部门计划摆脱困境并加速这一

旅程 当然还有

很多老想法 对前

石油人莫里斯·斯特朗说,并非所有的

化石都在燃料中,但正如

杜邦公司主席埃德加·威拉德提醒

我们的那样,在受旧思想阻碍的公司中

不会有问题,因为他说他们

根本不会长期存在。 '

不仅描述了一次

文明的商业机会,而且描述

了我们物种历史上最深刻的转变之一,我们人类正在

发明一种新的火,不是从下面挖出来的,

而是从上面流出来的,不是稀缺的,而是

丰富的,不是局部的,而是无处不在的

但永久不是昂贵的,而是

免费的,但对于

天然气和以

维持和忍受

这种新火灾的方式种植的一点生物燃料的一点过渡故事是无焰效率的 不

使用它真的可以在不工作的情况下完成我们的

工作 我们的撤销 你们每个人都拥有

那 5 万亿美元的奖金

,我们的新书《重新发明火》

描述了如何捕捉它,所以

在重新发明火的对话刚刚开始时,

请冷静让我邀请你

每个人都与我们、

彼此以及您周围的每个人互动,通过共同重新发明火来

帮助世界变得更丰富、更公平、更酷

、更安全,

谢谢

[鼓掌]