Fascism is Back. We Need to Take it Seriously.

about 10 years ago

my son was born at the time i was living

overseas

in trinidad and tobago and he didn’t

have the right to citizenship of that

country

so we applied for his british passport

and it was rejected my son had become

stateless for a brief period this was

intensely stressful

as i tried to figure out what we were

going to do

in the end i was able to resolve the

situation because i had connections not

because i had rights

at the same time in my country britain

state security institutions

were imprisoning and deporting long-term

law residents

who were rendered stateless as a result

without rights

when media pressure forced a u-churn of

these policies

the same state institutions deliberately

went slow

on compensation and restitution leaving

some of the victims to die

penniless in exile i want to talk to you

today about

fascism it’s no longer a dark chapter of

20th century history

it’s back and it seems to be winning

let’s look at some examples

an unpopular government uses

unconstitutional means

to suspend the legislature in order to

force through

an ultra-nationalist political agenda

in another country a former army captain

comes to power after an explicitly

racist political campaign

he institutes new laws that remove

protections for

indigenous minorities and celebrates a

historic

coup that had led to decades of military

dictatorship

elsewhere an aggressively nationalist

ruler

makes himself ruler for life

he institutes a program of mass

incarceration of an ethnic minority

and also pursues unfounded territorial

claims against neighbours backed up with

military threats

somewhere else again a traditionally

secular state

a violent political movement seeks to

redefine

citizenship as based on religion

members of religious minorities are

subjected to violent

pogroms and estate terms are blind eye

historic places of worship are bulldozed

in an attempt to

erase the religious minorities right

to have ever been part of that country’s

story

and finally an authoritarian president

does everything he can to undermine

faith in the outcome of an election that

he’s clearly lost

in a final desperate throw of the dice

he whips his supporters up into a

violent

frenzy and their attempt an insurrection

against the country’s legislature and of

course i’m talking about the events of

the 6th of january in washington dc

you might recognize some of the other

examples

the british government suspending

parliament

the fascist presidency of bolsonaro in

brazil

the suppression of the uyghurs in china

the ultra nationalist hindu movement in

india

okay so i’m a liberal and i don’t like

those politics but is it fascism do we

need to use the f

word is this even a useful term

if we call people fascist do we lose the

argument before it’s even begun

well fascism doesn’t actually have a

single dictionary definition but it’s

ultra nationalism expressed in violent

and authoritarian ways and because

fascism is nationalist

it takes a different form in every

country in the 20th century in the uk

fascists were obsessed with the history

of england oliver cromwell henry viii

if you look in india fascism has tried

to incorporate

ancient ideas of hindu nationalism into

its belief system

in america fascists are trying to align

their activities with the history

of america’s revolutionaries against the

british colonial rule

it’s always taking that national form

and the other thing about fascism is

this confusion with nazism

nazism was fascism but not all fascists

are nazis

so if we use that word we’re not saying

that these people are behaving like

hitler

but you don’t have to behave like hitler

to merit the description of fascism

authoritarian nationalism is always a

bad thing it always brings with it

oppression arbitrary arrest and

imprisonment

violence denials of minorities rights

we can’t just stand around and say don’t

worry they haven’t opened any

concentration camps yet as if that means

things are still okay

so why are these things happening well

there are lots of factors

some unrelated but they all come

together the traditional media has

become hyper partisan

look at the way fox news has covered the

aftermath of the insurrection in america

constantly saying well we need to bring

the country together

and yet fox news has done more to put

the country apart

than almost any other channel

social media concentrates people into

bubbles they’re only talking to people

they already agree with or people who

hold

similar but more extreme views than

themselves

and there’s a dislocation associated

with globalization

many communities seeing their

traditional industries and places of

work close down

the resulting disaffection with

democratic politics

is obvious in 2008 40 percent of people

in democracies were dissatisfied by 2020

that figure is 60

and the numbers are higher in the larger

democracy such as the usa

and finally there’s the pandemic effect

of fascist politics itself

it drives fear and hostility between

countries further empowering ultra

nationalism

and that has led to a concomitant

collapse of the global order

nobody believes in the un or the eu

anymore

it’s all about my country first america

first britain first china first

might overwrite

in spite of that fascists will work

together across international boundaries

if it’s in their interests

you look at the example of trump

addressing hindu nationalist rallies in

india

or trump’s advisor steve bannon helping

far-right parties in europe get to power

vladimir putin funding again far

right across the world so

fascists will work together while

liberals are dissipated and divided

so why does this matter well

you don’t have to wait for nazism for

fascism to be a problem

i proposed this talk last year long

before the events of the 6th of january

but let’s see where that has led a

violent insurrection

at the american congress

and there are other effects all over the

world the destruction of the brazil’s

rainforest

rise in sectarian violence in india

these are all features of 21st century

fascism

fascists work together as we’ve seen if

their nationalist aims

coincide but fascism stops countries

from working together in the global

interest

if we’re going to tackle the climate

emergency fascists have to lose power

but perhaps the most important point is

that fascism isn’t democracy it’s not

what the people want

donald trump lost the election by

millions of votes

boris johnson may have a large

parliamentary majority in the uk

but he got that from 43 percent of the

vote

rodrigo duterte in the philippines a

outright fascist

won his election on 39 of the vote

it’s not that fascists are what the

people want

it’s just that fascists are better at

taking and holding on to power

so what can we do i think there are

three things

we have to fight complacency

if we look at recent events brexit the

election of trump

there’s been many occasions when people

rather lazily thought they knew what the

outcome was going to be

we have to recognize that there’s a

problem and take

action we can’t wait for things to

happen

now if you’re not happy with the f word

i don’t mind that much

but we can’t pretend that normal

politics is in play at the moment

the second thing is i think we need to

educate ourselves

i’ve done some research on this i’ve

seen that half the world’s population

are currently living in countries run by

ultra nationalists let’s learn about

that

let’s learn about how fascists operate

they dehumanize their opponents they

make them stateless they take away their

rights

but the other thing they do is they

break

constitutional orders they behave in

ways

that cause accepted methods and

behaviors

to disappear look at what happened in

america

america’s constitution relied on the

loser of a presidential election

accepting the result and conceding the

refusal to do that

has created what could easily turn into

a violent insurgency in that country

and let’s recognize that this is a

global fight

it’s not enough to worry about elections

in your own country alone

you’ve got to think about what’s

happening to democracy everywhere

educate yourself about the struggles of

the democratic movement in hong kong for

example

look at what’s going on in india realize

that this is a global issue

now there are things we probably

shouldn’t do

shouting you’re a fascist at the

supporters of ultra nationalism probably

isn’t going to help very much

we have to strengthen the appeal of the

other side

many of the people who’ve been dragged

into supporting these politics are

people

who feel that they’ve lost their way

they’ve run out of options

we’ve got to give them reasons to leave

those politics behind

so final thoughts i think a lot of

people thought

that if joe biden won the election in

america

this would be a great setback for the

politics of

violence of white nationalism of

anti-democratic forces but what we’ve

seen is the opposite

it’s not just about the elections it’s

about the norms of behavior

the norms of political behavior are

being attacked

by fascists we have to stand firm

we have to reject that and we have to

remain vigilant

you

大约 10 年前,

我儿子出生时我住

在海外特立尼达和多巴哥,他

没有该国公民的权利,

所以我们申请了他的英国护照

,但被

拒绝了 短暂的这段时间

压力很大,

因为我试图弄清楚我们最终要做什么

当媒体压力迫使这些政策彻底改变时,驱逐因没有权利而成为无国籍的长期法律居民

同样的国家机构故意

在赔偿和恢复原状方面放慢脚步,让

一些受害者

在流亡中身无分文我想要 今天要和你谈谈

法西斯主义,它不再是 20 世纪历史的黑暗篇章,

它又回来了,它似乎正在获胜,

让我们看一些

例子 不受欢迎的政府使用

违宪

手段暂停立法机关,以

强制通过

另一个国家的极端民族主义政治议程 一名前陆军上尉

在一场明显的

种族主义政治运动后上台

他制定了新的法律,取消

土著少数民族的保护,并庆祝一个

历史性的

在其他地方导致数十年军事

独裁的政变

一个激进的民族主义

统治者使自己成为终身统治者

他制定了一项大规模

监禁少数民族的计划

,还

对在其他地方以军事威胁为后盾的邻国进行毫无根据的领土要求

又是一个传统的

世俗国家

一场暴力政治运动试图

重新定义

基于宗教的公民身份

宗教少数群体成员

遭受暴力

屠杀和遗产条款 视而不见

历史悠久的礼拜场所被推平

以试图

消除宗教少数群体

享有前夕的权利 r 成为该国

故事的一部分

,最后一位威权

总统竭尽全力破坏

对选举结果的信心,

他显然

在最后一次绝望的掷骰子中失去了信心,他将

他的支持者鞭打成

暴力

狂潮,他们的企图

反对该国立法机关的起义,

当然我说的

是 1 月 6 日在华盛顿特区发生的事件,

你可能会认识到其他一些

例子,英国政府暂停

议会

,巴西博尔索纳罗的法西斯总统

职位,中国镇压维吾尔人

印度的极端民族主义印度教运动

好吧,所以我是一个自由主义者,我不喜欢

那些政治,但是我们

需要使用 f

字是

法西斯主义吗?如果我们称人们为法西斯主义者,这甚至是一个有用的术语吗?

在它开始之前,

法西斯主义实际上并没有一个

单一的字典定义,而是

以暴力和专制方式表达的极端民族主义

由于

法西斯主义是民族主义的,

它在 20 世纪的每个国家都采取了不同的形式。

在英国,

法西斯主义者痴迷于

英国的历史 Oliver Cromwell 亨利八世

如果你看印度的话,法西斯主义试图将印度

民族主义的古老思想纳入

其信仰

美国的制度 法西斯主义者正试图将

他们的活动与

美国革命者反对

英国殖民统治的历史保持一致,

它总是采取那种

民族形式,而关于法西斯主义的另一件事是这种与纳粹主义的混淆纳粹主义是法西斯主义,但并非所有法西斯主义者

都是纳粹分子,

所以如果我们 使用这个词,我们并不是

说这些人的举止像

希特勒,

但你不必像希特勒那样行事,

才值得被描述为法西斯主义

威权民族主义总是一件

坏事,它总是带来

压迫任意逮捕和

监禁

暴力否认 少数族裔权利,

我们不能只是袖手旁观,说不用

担心他们还没有开放 任何

集中营,但似乎这意味着

一切都

还好,为什么这些事情发生得很好?

有很多不相关的因素,

但它们都聚集

在一起 传统媒体已经

变得极端党派

看待福克斯新闻报道

灾难后果的方式 美国的起义一直在

说我们需要

让国家团结起来

,但福克斯新闻在使国家分裂方面所做的工作

比几乎任何其他渠道都多

社交媒体将人们集中在

泡沫中

持有

类似但比他们自己更极端的观点

并且与全球化相关的错位

许多社区看到他们的

传统工业和工作场所

关闭,由此产生的对

民主政治的不满

在 2008 年很明显

到 2020 年,40% 的民主国家的人不满意

这个数字是 60

,在更大的民主国家中,这个数字更高,

例如 美国

,最后是法西斯政治本身的大流行效应

它引发了国家之间的恐惧和敌意,

进一步增强了极端

民族主义的力量

,并导致

全球秩序随之崩溃,

没有人相信联合国或欧盟

尽管法西斯分子

将在国际边界上合作,

如果符合他们的利益,美国优先英国优先

中国优先可能会被覆盖

再次为世界各地的弗拉基米尔·普京提供资金支持

法西斯主义者将共同努力,而

自由主义者则被驱散和

分裂为什么这很重要

你不必等待纳粹主义成为

法西斯主义问题

我去年提出了这个演讲

在 1 月 6 日的事件之前,

但让我们看看导致

暴力起义的地方

在美国国会上

以及在世界各地产生的其他影响

巴西热带雨林的破坏

在印度的宗派暴力上升

这些都是 21 世纪

法西斯主义

法西斯分子共同努力的特征,正如我们所看到的,如果

他们的民族主义目标

一致但法西斯主义阻止了国家

如果我们要解决气候

紧急情况法西斯主义者必须失去权力,就必须为全球利益共同努力,

但也许最重要的一点

是法西斯主义不是民主,也不

是人民想要的

唐纳德特朗普以

数百万票的优势输掉了选举

鲍里斯·约翰逊可能

在英国拥有议会多数席位,

但他从菲律宾罗德里戈·杜特尔特 43% 的

选票中

得知,一个

彻头彻尾的法西斯主义者

在 39 票的选举中获胜

更擅长

夺取和保持权力,

所以我们能

做些什么 看看最近的事件 brexit trump 的

选举

有很多时候人们

相当懒惰地认为他们知道

结果会是什么

我们必须认识到存在

问题并采取

行动 我们不能等待事情

现在发生 如果 你对 f 字不满意

我不太介意,

但我们不能假装现在正常的

政治正在发挥作用

第二件事是我认为我们需要

自我教育

我已经对此进行了一些研究 我已经

看到世界上一半的人口

目前生活在由

极端民族主义者统治的国家让我们了解一下

让我们了解法西斯主义者如何运作

他们使对手非人化他们

使他们无国籍他们剥夺了他们的

权利

但他们做的另一件事是他们

打破

宪法秩序 他们的行为

方式导致公认的方法和

行为消失 看看美国发生了什么

美国宪法依赖于

总统选举的

失败者 接受结果并承认

拒绝这样做

已经在那个国家造成了很容易

变成暴力叛乱的事情

,让我们认识到这是一场

全球性的斗争

,仅仅担心自己国家的选举是不够的,

你必须考虑 了解

各地的民主正在发生什么

让自己了解

香港民主运动的斗争,例如

看看印度正在发生的事情

意识到这是一个全球性问题

现在有些事情我们可能

不应该做

大喊你是法西斯主义者 在

极端民族主义的支持者

可能不会有太大帮助

我们必须加强对方的吸引力

许多被

拖入支持这些政治的

人是

那些觉得自己迷失了方向的

人 “我们已经没有任何选择了,

我们必须给他们理由把

这些政治抛在脑后,

所以最后的想法我想很多

认为如果乔·拜登赢得了选举

美国

这对于反民主力量的白人民族主义的暴力政治来说将是一个巨大的挫折,

但我们所

看到的恰恰相反,

这不仅与选举

有关,而且与

行为规范有关,政治行为规范

正在受到

攻击 法西斯 我们必须坚定立场

我们必须拒绝这一点 我们必须

保持警惕