The case for fish farming Mike Velings

So I come from the tallest
people on the planet –

the Dutch.

It hasn’t always been this way.

In fact, all across the globe,
people have been gaining height.

In the last 150 years,

in developed countries,

on average, we have gotten
10 centimeters taller.

And scientists have a lot
of theories about why this is,

but almost all of them involve nutrition,

namely the increase of dairy and meat.

In the last 50 years,

global meat consumption
has more than quadrupled,

from 71 million tons to 310 million tons.

Something similar has been going on
with milk and eggs.

In every society where incomes have risen,
so has protein consumption.

And we know that globally,
we are getting richer.

And as the middle class is on the rise,
so is our global population,

from 7 billion of us today
to 9.7 billion by 2050,

which means that by 2050,

we are going to need at least
70 percent more protein

than what is available to humankind today.

And the latest prediction of the UN
puts that population number,

by the end of this century, at 11 billion,

which means that we are going
to need a lot more protein.

This challenge is staggering –

so much so, that recently,

a team at Anglia Ruskin
Global Sustainability Institute suggested

that if we don’t change
our global policies

and food production systems,

our societies might actually collapse
in the next 30 years.

Currently, our ocean serves
as the main source of animal protein.

Over 2.6 billion people
depend on it every single day.

At the same time,

our global fisheries
are two-and-a-half times larger

than what our oceans
can sustainably support,

meaning that humans take
far more fish from the ocean

than the oceans can naturally replace.

WWF recently published a report
showing that just in the last 40 years,

our global marine life
has been slashed in half.

And another recent report suggests
that of our largest predatory species,

such as swordfish and bluefin tuna,

over 90 percent has disappeared
since the 1950s.

And there are a lot of great, sustainable
fishing initiatives across the planet

working towards better practices
and better-managed fisheries.

But ultimately,

all of these initiatives are working
towards keeping current catch constant.

It’s unlikely,

even with the best-managed fisheries,

that we are going to be able to take
much more from the ocean

than we do today.

We have to stop plundering
our oceans the way we have.

We need to alleviate the pressure on it.

And we are at a point

where if we push much harder
for more produce,

we might face total collapse.

Our current systems are not going to feed
a growing global population.

So how do we fix this?

What’s the world going to look like
in just 35 short years

when there’s 2.7 billion more of us
sharing the same resources?

We could all become vegan.

Sounds like a great idea,

but it’s not realistic

and it’s impossibly hard
to mandate globally.

People are eating animal protein
whether we like it or not.

And suppose we fail to change our ways

and continue on the current path,

failing to meet demands.

The World Health Organization
recently reported

that 800 million people are suffering
from malnutrition and food shortage,

which is due to that same
growing, global population

and the declining access to resources
like water, energy and land.

It takes very little imagination

to picture a world of global unrest,
riots and further malnutrition.

People are hungry,

and we are running dangerously low
on natural resources.

For so, so many reasons,

we need to change our global
food production systems.

We must do better

and there is a solution.

And that solution lies in aquaculture –

the farming of fish, plants like seaweed,
shellfish and crustaceans.

As the great ocean hero
Jacques Cousteau once said,

“We must start using the ocean
as farmers instead of hunters.

That’s what civilization is all about –
farming instead of hunting.”

Fish is the last food that we hunt.

And why is it that we keep
hearing phrases like,

“Life’s too short for farmed fish,”

or, “Wild-caught, of course!”

over fish that we know
virtually nothing about?

We don’t know what it ate
during its lifetime,

and we don’t know what
pollution it encounters.

And if it was a large predatory species,

it might have gone through the coast
of Fukushima yesterday.

We don’t know.

Very few people realize

the traceability in fisheries
never goes beyond the hunter

that caught the wild animal.

But let’s back up for a second

and talk about why fish
is the best food choice.

It’s healthy,

it prevents heart disease,

it provides key amino acids

and key fatty acids like Omega-3s,

which is very different from almost
any other type of meat.

And aside from being healthy,

it’s also a lot more exciting and diverse.

Think about it – most animal farming
is pretty monotonous.

Cow is cow, sheep is sheep, pig’s pig,

and poultry – turkey, duck, chicken –
pretty much sums it up.

And then there’s 500 species of fish
being farmed currently.

not that Western supermarkets
reflect that on their shelves,

but that’s beside that point.

And you can farm fish
in a very healthy manner

that’s good for us, good for the planet
and good for the fish.

I know I sound fish-obsessed –

(Laughter)

Let me explain:

My brilliant partner and wife,
Amy Novograntz, and I got involved

in aquaculture a couple of years ago.

We were inspired by Sylvia Earle,

who won the TED Prize in 2009.

We actually met on Mission Blue I
in the Galapagos.

Amy was there as the TED Prize Director;

me, an entrepreneur from the Netherlands
and concerned citizen,

love to dive, passion for the oceans.

Mission Blue truly changed our lives.

We fell in love,

got married

and we came away really inspired,

thinking we really want to do something
about ocean conservation –

something that was meant to last,

that could make a real difference

and something that we could do together.

Little did we expect that that would
lead us to fish farming.

But a few months after
we got off the boat,

we got to a meeting
at Conservation International,

where the Director General of WorldFish
was talking about aquaculture,

asking a room full of environmentalists
to stop turning from it,

realize what was going on

and to really get involved

because aquaculture has the potential

to be just what our oceans
and populations need.

We were stunned when we heard the stats

that we didn’t know more
about this industry already

and excited about the chance
to help get it right.

And to talk about stats –

right now, the amount of fish
consumed globally,

wild catch and farmed combined,

is twice the tonnage
of the total amount of beef

produced on planet earth last year.

Every single fishing vessel combined,

small and large, across the globe,

together produce about 65 million tons
of wild-caught seafood

for human consumption.

Aquaculture this year,

for the first time in history,

actually produces more
than what we catch from the wild.

But now this:

Demand is going to go up.

In the next 35 years,

we are going to need an additional
85 million tons to meet demand,

which is one-and-a-half times
as much, almost,

as what we catch globally
out of our oceans.

An enormous number.

It’s safe to assume that that’s not
going to come from the ocean.

It needs to come from farming.

And talk about farming –

for farming you need resources.

As a human needs to eat
to grow and stay alive,

so does an animal.

A cow needs to eat
eight to nine pounds of feed

and drink almost 8,000 liters of water

to create just one pound of meat.

Experts agree that it’s impossible

to farm cows for every
inhabitant on this planet.

We just don’t have enough feed or water.

And we can’t keep cutting down
rain forests for it.

And fresh water – planet earth
has a very limited supply.

We need something more efficient

to keep humankind alive on this planet.

And now let’s compare
that with fish farming.

You can farm one pound of fish
with just one pound of feed,

and depending on species, even less.

And why is that?

Well, that’s because fish,
first of all, float.

They don’t need to stand around all day
resisting gravity like we do.

And most fish are cold-blooded –

they don’t need to heat themselves.

Fish chills.

(Laughter)

And it needs very little water,

which is counterintuitive,

but as we say,

it swims in it but it hardly drinks it.

Fish are the most resource-efficient
animal protein available to humankind,

aside from insects.

How much we’ve learned since.

For example, on top of that
65 million tons that’s annually caught

for human consumption,

there’s an additional 30 million tons
caught for animal feed,

mostly sardines and anchovies
for the aquaculture industry

that’s turned into fish meal and fish oil.

This is madness.

Sixty-five percent of these fisheries,
globally, are badly managed.

Some of the worst issues
of our time are connected to it.

It’s destroying our oceans.

The worst slavery issues
imaginable are connected to it.

Recently, an article came out of Stanford

saying that if 50 percent
of the world’s aquaculture industry

would stop using fish meal,

our oceans would be saved.

Now think about that for a minute.

Now, we know that the oceans
have far more problems –

they have pollution,
there’s acidification,

coral reef destruction and so on.

But it underlines the impact
of our fisheries,

and it underlines how
interconnected everything is.

Fisheries, aquaculture, deforestation,

climate change, food security and so on.

In the search for alternatives,

the industry, on a massive scale,

has reverted to plant-based alternatives

like soy, industrial chicken waste,

blood meal from slaughterhouses

and so on.

And we understand where
these choices come from,

but this is not the right approach.

It’s not sustainable,

it’s not healthy.

Have you ever seen a chicken
at the bottom of the ocean?

Of course not.

If you feed salmon soy with nothing else,

it literally explodes.

Salmon is a carnivore,

it has no way to digest soy.

Now, fish farming is by far

the best animal farming
available to humankind.

But it’s had a really bad reputation.

There’s been excessive use of chemicals,

there’s been virus and disease
transfered to wild populations,

ecosystem destruction and pollution,

escaped fish breeding
with wild populations,

altering the overall genetic pool,

and then of course, as just mentioned,

the unsustainable feed ingredients.

How blessed were the days

when we could just enjoy
food that was on our plate,

whatever it was.

Once you know, you know.

You can’t go back.

It’s not fun.

We really need a transparent food
system that we can trust,

that produces healthy food.

But the good news is

that decades of development and research

have led to a lot of new
technologies and knowledge

that allow us to do a lot better.

We can now farm fish
without any of these issues.

I think of agriculture
before the green revolution –

we are at aquaculture
and the blue revolution.

New technologies means

that we can now produce a feed
that’s perfectly natural,

with a minimal footprint

that consists of microbes, insects,
seaweeds and micro-algae.

Healthy for the people,

healthy for the fish,

healthy for the planet.

Microbes, for example,

can be a perfect alternative
for high-grade fish meal –

at scale.

Insects are the –

well, first of all, the perfect recycling

because they’re grown on food waste;

but second,

think of fly-fishing,

and you know how logical
it actually is to use it as fish feed.

You don’t need large tracts of land for it

and you don’t need
to cut down rain forests for it.

And microbes and insects are actually
net water producers.

This revolution is starting as we speak,

it just needs scale.

We can now farm far more
species than ever before

in controlled, natural conditions,
creating happy fish.

I imagine, for example,

a closed system that’s performing
more efficiently than insect farming,

where you can produce
healthy, happy, delicious fish

with little or no effluent,

almost no energy and almost no water

and a natural feed
with a minimal footprint.

Or a system where you grow
up to 10 species next to each other –

off of each other,

mimicking nature.

You need very little feed,

very little footprint.

I think of seaweed growing
off the effluent of fish, for example.

There’s great technologies
popping up all over the globe.

From alternatives to battle disease

so we don’t need antibiotics
and chemicals anymore,

to automated feeders that feel
when the fish are hungry,

so we can save on feed
and create less pollution.

Software systems that gather
data across farms,

so we can improve farm practices.

There’s really cool stuff
happening all over the globe.

And make no mistake –
all of these things are possible

at a cost that’s competitive
to what a farmer spends today.

Tomorrow, there will be no excuse
for anyone to not do the right thing.

So somebody needs to connect the dots

and give these developments
a big kick in the butt.

And that’s what we’ve been working on
the last couple of years,

and that’s what we need
to be working on together –

rethinking everything from the ground up,

with a holistic view
across the value chain,

connecting all these things
across the globe,

alongside great entrepreneurs

that are willing to share
a collective vision.

Now is the time to create
change in this industry

and to push it into
a sustainable direction.

This industry is still young,

much of its growth is still ahead.

It’s a big task, but not
as far-fetched as you might think.

It’s possible.

So we need to take pressure off the ocean.

We want to eat good and healthy.

And if we eat an animal,
it needs to be one

that had a happy and healthy life.

We need to have a meal that we can trust,

live long lives.

And this is not just for people
in San Francisco or Northern Europe –

this is for all of us.

Even in the poorest countries,

it’s not just about money.

People prefer something fresh
and healthy that they can trust

over something that comes from far away
that they know nothing about.

We’re all the same.

The day will come

where people will realize – no, demand –
farmed fish on their plate

that’s farmed well
and that’s farmed healthy –

and refuse anything less.

You can help speed this up.

Ask questions when you order seafood.

Where does my fish come from?

Who raised it,

and what did it eat?

Information about where your fish
comes from and how it was produced

needs to be much more readily available.

And consumers need to put pressure
on the aquaculture industry

to do the right thing.

So every time you order,

ask for detail

and show that you really care
about what you eat

and what’s been given to you.

And eventually, they will listen.

And all of us will benefit.

Thank you.

(Applause)

所以我来自地球上最高的

——荷兰人。

并非总是如此。

事实上,在全球范围内,
人们的身高一直在增加。

在过去的 150 年里,

在发达国家

,我们平均
身高增加了 10 厘米。

科学家们有很多
关于为什么会这样的理论,

但几乎所有理论都涉及营养,

即奶制品和肉类的增加。

在过去的 50 年中,

全球肉类消费
量翻了两番多,

从 7100 万吨增加到 3.1 亿吨。 牛奶和鸡蛋

也发生了类似的事情

在每个收入增加的社会中
,蛋白质消费量也在增加。

我们知道,在全球范围内,
我们正在变得更加富有。

随着中产阶级的崛起
,我们的全球人口也在增加,

从今天的 70 亿
增加到 2050 年的 97 亿,

这意味着到 2050 年,

我们需要的
蛋白质将比现有的蛋白质至少多 70%

今天的人类。

联合国的最新预测显示,

到本世纪末,人口数量将达到 110 亿,

这意味着我们
将需要更多的蛋白质。

这一挑战是惊人的——

以至于最近,

Anglia Ruskin
全球可持续发展研究所的一个团队建议

,如果我们不改变
我们的全球政策

和粮食生产系统,

我们的社会实际上可能
在未来 30 年内崩溃。

目前,我们的海洋
是动物蛋白的主要来源。 每天有

超过 26 亿人
依赖它。

与此同时,

我们的全球渔业
规模

是海洋
可持续支持能力的两倍半,

这意味着人类
从海洋中捕捞的鱼类数量远远

超过海洋自然能够替代的数量。

世界自然基金会最近发布的一份报告
显示,仅仅在过去的 40 年里,

我们的全球海洋生物
已经减少了一半。

最近的另一份报告
表明,我们最大的掠食性物种,

如箭鱼和蓝鳍金枪鱼,自 1950 年代以来

已经消失了 90% 以上

全球范围内有许多伟大的、可持续的
捕鱼计划

致力于更好的做法
和更好的渔业管理。

但最终,

所有这些举措都在
努力保持当前渔获量不变。

即使是管理最好的渔业

,我们也不太可能
从海洋中获取

比今天更多的东西。

我们必须停止
像现在这样掠夺我们的海洋。

我们需要减轻它的压力。

而且我们正处于一个阶段

,如果我们更加努力地
争取更多的产品,

我们可能会面临全面崩溃。

我们目前的系统无法
养活不断增长的全球人口。

那么我们如何解决这个问题呢?

短短 35 年后,

当我们中有 27 亿人
共享相同的资源时,世界会是什么样子?

我们都可以成为素食主义者。

听起来是个好主意,

但它不现实

,而且很难
在全球范围内强制执行。

不管我们喜不喜欢,人们都在吃动物蛋白。

假设我们不能改变我们的方式

并继续当前的道路,

不能满足需求。

世界卫生组织
最近报告

说,8 亿人正
遭受营养不良和食物短缺的困扰,

这是由于
全球人口不断增长

以及
水、能源和土地等资源的获取减少。

想象

一个充满全球动荡、
骚乱和进一步营养不良的世界需要很少的想象力。

人们正在挨饿,

而我们的自然资源正处于危险的低位

由于如此多的原因,

我们需要改变我们的全球
粮食生产系统。

我们必须做得更好,

并且有解决办法。

解决方案在于水产养殖

——养殖鱼类、海藻等植物、
贝类和甲壳类动物。

正如伟大的海洋英雄
雅克·库斯托(Jacques Cousteau)曾经说过的那样,

“我们必须开始将海洋
作为农民而不是猎人。

这就是文明的全部意义——
耕作而不是狩猎。”

鱼是我们捕猎的最后食物。

为什么我们总是
听到诸如

“养殖鱼的生命太短暂”

或“当然是野生捕捞的!”之类的短语。

关于我们
几乎一无所知的鱼?

我们不知道它一生吃了什么

也不知道
它遇到了什么污染。

如果它是大型掠食性物种,

它可能昨天已经穿过
福岛海岸。

我们不知道。

很少有人意识到

渔业的可追溯性
永远不会

超出捕获野生动物的猎人。

但是,让我们稍等片刻

,谈谈为什么鱼
是最好的食物选择。

它很健康,

可以预防心脏病

,提供关键氨基酸

和 Omega-3 等关键脂肪酸,

这与几乎
任何其他类型的肉类都非常不同。

除了健康之外,

它也更加令人兴奋和多样化。

想想看——大多数
畜牧业都很单调。

牛是牛,羊是羊,猪是猪

,家禽——火鸡、鸭子、鸡——
几乎可以概括。

目前养殖的鱼类有500种

并不是说西方超市
在他们的货架上反映了

这一点,但那不是这一点。

您可以
以非常健康的方式养殖鱼类,

这对我们、对地球
和鱼类都有好处。

我知道我听起来对鱼很着迷——

(笑声)

让我解释一下:

我出色的伴侣和妻子,
艾米·诺沃格兰茨,

几年前我开始涉足水产养殖。

我们受到了

2009 年获得 TED 奖的 Sylvia Earle 的启发。

我们实际上是在加拉帕戈斯群岛的 Mission Blue I 上认识
的。

艾米是 TED 奖的负责人;

我,来自荷兰的企业家
和关心的公民,

热爱潜水,对海洋充满热情。

蓝色使命真正改变了我们的生活。

我们相爱了,

结婚了

,我们离开时真的很受鼓舞,

认为我们真的想做一些
关于海洋保护的

事情——一些注定要持续下去的事情,

这可以产生真正的影响

,而且我们可以一起做一些事情。

我们没想到这会
导致我们开始养鱼。

但在
我们下船几个月后,

我们在 Conservation International 参加了一次会议

,WorldFish 总干事
正在那里谈论水产养殖,

要求一屋子的环保主义
者不要再转过头来,

了解正在发生的事情

并 真正参与进来,

因为水产养殖有

可能成为我们的海洋
和人口所需要的。

当我们听到我们对这个行业还不太了解的统计数据时,我们都惊呆了

并为有
机会帮助它做好准备感到兴奋。

谈谈统计数据——

现在,全球消耗的鱼
量、

野生捕捞量和养殖量的总和,

去年地球上牛肉总产量的两倍。

全球每艘渔船,

无论大小,

共同生产约 6500
万吨野生海产品

供人类食用。

今年的水产养殖

历史上第一次

实际产量
超过了我们从野外捕获的产量。

但现在:

需求将上升。

在接下来的 35 年中,

我们将需要额外的
8500 万吨来满足需求,


几乎

是我们在全球范围内从海洋中捕获的捕捞量的一倍半

一个巨大的数字。

可以肯定的是,这
不会来自海洋。

它需要来自农业。

谈论农业

——农业需要资源。

正如人类需要进食
才能成长和维持生命一样,

动物也是如此。

一头牛需要吃
8 到 9 磅饲料

并喝近 8,000 升水

才能生产出一磅肉。

专家们一致认为,


这个星球上的每个居民饲养奶牛是不可能的。

我们只是没有足够的饲料或水。

我们不能为此不断砍伐
雨林。

还有淡水——
地球的供应非常有限。

我们需要更有效的东西

来让人类在这个星球上生存。

现在让我们将
其与养鱼业进行比较。

您可以
只用一磅饲料养殖一磅鱼,

而且取决于物种,甚至更少。

为什么是这样?

嗯,那是因为鱼,
首先,漂浮。

他们不需要
像我们一样整天站着抵抗重力。

而且大多数鱼都是冷血的——

它们不需要加热自己。

鱼儿发冷。

(笑声

) 它只需要很少的水,

这是违反直觉的,

但正如我们所说,

它在里面游泳,但几乎不喝水。 除昆虫外,

鱼类是人类可获得的资源效率最高的
动物蛋白

从那以后我们学到了多少。

例如,除了
每年捕捞的

用于人类消费的 6500 万吨

之外,还有另外 3000 万吨
用于动物饲料,

主要是
用于水产养殖业的沙丁鱼和凤尾鱼,这些

鱼被加工成鱼粉和鱼油。

这太疯狂了。

在全球范围内,这些渔业中有 65% 管理不善。

我们这个时代的一些最糟糕的问题与它有关。

它正在摧毁我们的海洋。 可以想象

的最严重的奴隶制问题
与此有关。

最近,斯坦福大学发表的一篇文章

说,如果
世界上 50% 的水产养殖

业停止使用鱼粉,

我们的海洋就会得到拯救。

现在想一想。

现在,我们知道海洋
有更多的问题——

它们有污染
、酸化、

珊瑚礁破坏等等。

但它强调
了我们渔业的影响

,它强调了
一切是如何相互关联的。

渔业、水产养殖、森林砍伐、

气候变化、粮食安全等。

在寻找替代品的过程中

,该行业已大规模

转向植物性替代品,

如大豆、工业鸡粪、

屠宰场血粉

等。

我们了解
这些选择的来源,

但这不是正确的方法。

这不可持续,

不健康。

你见过
海底的鸡吗?

当然不是。

如果你只喂三文鱼大豆,

它真的会爆炸。

三文鱼是肉食动物,

它无法消化大豆。

现在,养鱼业是迄今为止

人类最好的
畜牧业。

但它的名声真的很差。

过度使用化学物质

,病毒和疾病
传播到野生种群,

生态系统破坏和污染,

鱼类
与野生种群的繁殖逃脱,

改变了整个基因库

,当然,正如刚才提到的

,不可持续的饲料成分。

我们可以享受
我们盘子里的食物的日子是多么幸福,

不管它是什么。

一旦你知道了,你就知道了。

你不能回去。

这不好玩。

我们真的需要一个
我们可以信任的透明食品系统

,生产健康食品。

但好消息是

,数十年的发展和研究

带来了许多新
技术和知识

,使我们能够做得更好。

我们现在可以在
没有任何这些问题的情况下养殖鱼类。

我想到
了绿色革命之前的农业——

我们处于水产养殖
和蓝色革命中。

新技术

意味着我们现在可以生产一种
完全天然的饲料,

并且由微生物、昆虫、
海藻和微藻组成的足迹最小。

对人类

健康,对鱼类

健康,对地球健康。

例如,微生物

可以成为大规模鱼粉的完美替代品

昆虫是——

嗯,首先,完美的回收利用,

因为它们是在食物垃圾上生长的;

但第二,

想想飞钓

,你就知道
将它用作鱼饲料实际上是多么合乎逻辑。

你不需要大片土地

,也不
需要砍伐雨林。

微生物和昆虫实际上是
净水生产者。

正如我们所说,这场革命正在开始,

它只需要规模。

我们现在可以在受控的自然条件下养殖
比以往任何时候都多的物种


创造快乐的鱼。

例如,我想象

一个
比昆虫养殖效率更高的封闭系统

,您可以在其中生产
健康、快乐、美味的鱼

,几乎没有或没有污水,

几乎没有能源,几乎没有水,

并且是
一种占地面积最小的天然饲料。

或者一个系统,你可以在其中生长
多达 10 个物种

,彼此相邻,

模仿自然。

你需要很少的饲料,

很少的足迹。

例如,我想到了
从鱼的排泄物中长出的海藻。

世界各地涌现出许多伟大的技术

从抗击疾病的替代品,

我们不再需要抗生素
和化学品,

到自动喂食器,
当鱼饿了时

,我们可以节省饲料
并减少污染。

跨农场收集数据的软件系统,

因此我们可以改进农场实践。

全球各地都在发生非常酷的事情。

别搞错了——
所有这些事情都是可能

的,其成本与
农民今天的花费相比是有竞争力的。

明天,
任何人都没有理由不做正确的事。

所以有人需要把这些点联系起来

,给这些发展
一个很大的打击。

这就是我们过去几年一直在

做的事情,也是我们
需要一起努力的

事情——从头开始重新思考一切,从整个价值链

的整体观点出发

将全球所有这些事情联系
起来 ,

愿意
分享集体愿景的伟大企业家一起。

现在是
在这个行业创造变革

并将其
推向可持续发展方向的时候了。

这个行业还很年轻,

它的大部分增长仍然遥遥领先。

这是一项艰巨的任务,但并不
像您想象的那么牵强。

这是可能的。

所以我们需要减轻海洋的压力。

我们想吃得又好又健康。

如果我们吃动物,
它必须是

一种幸福健康的生活。

我们需要吃一顿我们可以信任的饭,

长寿。

这不仅适用
于旧金山或北欧的人们

——也适用于我们所有人。

即使在最贫穷的国家,

这也不仅仅是钱的问题。

人们更喜欢新鲜
和健康的东西,他们可以信任

,而不是来自远方
但他们一无所知的东西。

我们都一样。

总有一天

,人们会意识到——不,是需求——
在他们的盘子里养殖的鱼

,养殖得好
,养殖得健康——

并拒绝任何更少的东西。

您可以帮助加快速度。

在订购海鲜时提出问题。

我的鱼是从哪里来的?

谁养的,

它吃什么?

有关您的鱼
来自哪里以及如何生产的信息

需要更容易获得。

消费者需要
对水产养殖业施加压力,

让他们做正确的事。

因此,每次您订购时,

请询问详细信息

并表明您真的很
关心您吃

的东西和给您的东西。

最终,他们会倾听。

我们所有人都会受益。

谢谢你。

(掌声)