Can bees help us to design sustainable supermarkets

Transcriber:
Reviewer: lisa thompson

Have you ever thrown out
a bottle of runny honey

because it was taking too long
to squeeze that last bit out?

I’ll admit it, I’ve definitely
done that before.

But I recently found out

that the average worker bee only produces
about 1/12 of a teaspoon of honey

throughout its entire life.

Those last few drops that I could not
be bothered to squeeze out

equate to the lifework of dozens of bees

just wasted.

That really struck me.

We rarely think of the backstory
of our food when we shop for it,

and I think a lot of that relates
to the places in which we shop.

As an architectural
researcher and designer,

I’m really interested in how spaces
are designed for disconnection

and the social and environmental
implications of this.

This disconnection between people, food
and place is a relatively new phenomenon.

That’s because early cities

would have evolved next to areas
of fertile land called a hinterland.

And it was within this zone
that nearly all the city’s food was grown.

As the city and hinterland
were physically connected,

these early settlements
were circular in nature.

Food would have been produced
and consumed locally,

and waste would have been collected
to produce more food,

while packaging would have been
continuously reused.

Where circular systems help resources
to move in continuous loops,

contemporary food supply chains
are longer and much more linear.

Due to advances in refrigeration,
packaging and logistics,

today, our hinterland
is the size of the whole world,

and we encounter it every time
we zoom through our local supermarket.

Here in the UK, supermarkets
are the primary interface

between us and those global supply chains.

Amazingly, just nine retailers control
over 95 percent of the grocery market.

And I have to admit,

supermarkets do provide us
with a convenient shopping experience.

But this comes with huge
and largely unseen environmental cost.

Firstly, around 45 percent of our food
is imported from outside the UK.

Moving food around the world

means that it’s difficult
to avoid single-use packaging,

and most of our food
is still wrapped in it.

And despite the value of packaging
to lengthen shelf life,

still, around a third of all food
produced is just thrown away.

This cannot be acceptable.

As our climate changes
and resources become scarcer,

we urgently need
to reconnect with our food

and consume more sustainably.

To do this, I think we need
to look again at supermarkets.

As a researcher,
I’ve spent the last few years

really trying to understand
this complex problem.

And as a designer,

I’ve also become interested
in testing some supermarket-led solutions.

Looking back to the early city
and its relationship to hinterland,

I started to think about
how the principles of circularity

might help supermarkets
become more sustainable.

I thought to myself, What would
a truly circular supermarket look like?

How would it operate?

The only way that I could begin
to answer some of those questions

was by designing one.

So I did,

and I imagined it
to be a bit like a beehive.

You see, bees can only source
as far as they can fly.

It’s back to that idea
of city and hinterland again.

A truly circular supermarket
would have to start

by radically localizing food supply again.

In doing so, it would no longer
be a node along a global supply chain;

instead, it would be more like a hub

or a beehive hosting
a mini food system inside it.

You see, this supermarket
wouldn’t just be a place to buy food,

it would also be a place to grow it,
to preserve it, to package it,

to cook it and to even eat it.

This supermarket would also help to close
waste streams in its local neighborhood.

A worker bee mobility fleet would deliver
and collect from local homes,

bringing waste back to the supermarket
to produce energy and food.

This whole system would be underpinned
by a separation of food and packaging.

That means no more single-use plastic

and a return to either biodegradable
honeycomb or a reusable honeypot.

A bit like a library loan scheme,

shoppers could check in and out packaging

so that when it returned to store,
it could be cleaned for reuse.

This circular supermarket

would rely heavily on a renewed culture
of sharing within neighborhoods,

sharing of packaging as well as mobility,

energy, food waste, time and skills.

The store loyalty card would be reinvented

as a platform for shoppers
to share with each other

as well as the supermarket.

But for any of this to work,

local people would have
to buy into a hive mentality

and play their part
to make food systems more sustainable.

How would this new food system be more
sustainable than the one we already have?

Well, by localizing production
and consumption,

food and packaging waste
could be eliminated

and food miles could be reduced

from a journey across a continent
to a journey across a city.

Vitally, by bringing
the hinterland into the city,

this system would enable people
to reconnect with food again.

This circular supermarket benefits
from a big dose of blue sky thinking.

Of course, it’s radical,

and it’s certainly
not grounded in today’s reality.

But …

in a climate emergency,

we need big ideas

because we know that today’s reality

won’t look very much like tomorrow’s.

We can no longer
just patch up broken systems.

Instead, we need to imagine new ones,

ones that enable reconnection
with our environment and each other.

If we want a more sustainable supermarket,

if we want a more sustainable future,

we need to think like bees
and design it, together.

Thank you.

抄写员:
审稿人: lisa thompson

你有没有

因为
挤出最后一点时间太长而扔掉一瓶流鼻涕的蜂蜜?

我承认,我以前
肯定做过。

但我最近发现

,普通工蜂一生只生产
大约 1/12 茶匙的蜂蜜

最后几滴
我懒得挤出来,

相当于浪费了几十只蜜蜂的生命

这真的让我很震惊。

当我们购买食物时,我们很少想到食物的背景故事

,我认为其中很多都
与我们购物的地方有关。

作为一名建筑
研究人员和设计师,

我对
如何设计空间以实现脱节

以及由此产生的社会和环境
影响非常感兴趣。

人、食物和地方之间的这种脱节
是一个相对较新的现象。

那是因为早期的城市


在肥沃的土地附近发展,称为腹地。

正是在这个区域
内种植了几乎所有城市的食物。

由于城市和腹地
在物理上相连,

这些早期的定居点
本质上是圆形的。

食物将在当地生产
和消费

,废物将被收集
以生产更多食物,

而包装将
不断重复使用。

在循环系统帮助
资源连续循环的地方,

当代食品供应
链更长,更线性。

由于制冷、
包装和物流的进步,

今天,我们的腹地
已经是整个世界的大小

,每次
我们在当地的超市里放大时都会遇到它。

在英国,超市

我们与全球供应链之间的主要接口。

令人惊讶的是,只有九家零售商控制
了超过 95% 的杂货市场。

我不得不承认,

超市确实为我们
提供了便捷的购物体验。

但这带来了巨大
且基本上看不见的环境成本。

首先,我们大约 45% 的食品
是从英国以外进口的。

将食品运送到世界各地

意味着
很难避免一次性包装,

而且我们的大部分食品
仍然包裹在其中。

尽管
包装具有延长保质期的价值,但

仍有约三分之一的食品
被扔掉。

这是不能接受的。

随着我们的气候变化
和资源变得越来越稀缺,

我们迫切
需要重新与我们的食物联系起来,

并以更可持续的方式消费。

为此,我认为我们需要
重新审视超市。

作为一名研究人员,
过去几年我一直在

努力理解
这个复杂的问题。

作为一名设计师,

我也
对测试一些超市主导的解决方案感兴趣。

回顾早期城市
及其与腹地的关系,

我开始思考
循环原则

如何帮助超市
变得更具可持续性。

我心想
,真正的圆形超市会是什么样子?

它将如何运作?

我可以
开始回答其中一些问题的唯一方法

是设计一个。

所以我做了

,我想象
它有点像一个蜂箱。

你看,蜜蜂
只能在它们能飞的范围内采购。

又回到
了城市和腹地的想法。

一个真正的循环超市
必须

从彻底本地化食品供应开始。

这样一来,它将不再
是全球供应链上的一个节点;

相反,它更像是一个集线器

或蜂箱,
里面有一个迷你食品系统。

你看,这家
超市不仅仅是一个购买食物的地方,

它也是一个种植
、保存、包装

、烹饪甚至食用的地方。

这家超市还将帮助关闭
当地社区的废物流。

工蜂机动车队将
从当地家庭运送和收集,

将废物带回
超市生产能源和食物。

整个系统将以
食品和包装分离为基础。

这意味着不再使用一次性塑料

,而是回归可生物降解的
蜂窝或可重复使用的蜜罐。

有点像图书馆借阅计划,

购物者可以签入和签出包装,

这样当它返回商店时
,可以进行清洁以供重复使用。

这个循环超市

将在很大程度上依赖
于社区内

共享、包装共享以及流动性、

能源、食物浪费、时间和技能的共享文化。

商店会员卡将被重新设计

为购物
者之间

以及超市共享的平台。

但要使这一切奏效,

当地人必须
接受蜂巢心态

并发挥自己的作用
,使粮食系统更具可持续性。

这种新的粮食系统如何
比我们已有的更可持续?

好吧,通过本地化生产
和消费,可以消除

食品和包装浪费,并且

可以将食品里程

从穿越
大陆的旅程减少到穿越城市的旅程。

至关重要的是,通过
将腹地带入城市,

该系统将使人们
能够再次与食物重新联系。

这个圆形超市
得益于大量的蓝天思维。

当然,它是激进的,

而且肯定
不是基于当今的现实。

但是……

在气候紧急情况下,

我们需要大创意,

因为我们知道今天的现实

看起来不会很像明天的。

我们不能再
只是修补损坏的系统。

相反,我们需要想象新的事物,

那些能够
与我们的环境和彼此重新连接的事物。

如果我们想要一个更可持续的超市,

如果我们想要一个更可持续的未来,

我们需要像蜜蜂一样思考
并共同设计它。

谢谢你。