Farming Evolved Agriculture Through A different Lens

Transcriber: Thảo Nguyên Nguyễn
Reviewer: Rhonda Jacobs

Thank you all for having me today.

I’d like to introduce you
two very special people to me,

who, through the challenges
they were born with,

have helped me to see
our food system through a different lens.

This is my son, Spencer.

He was born with a rare syndrome
called 49,XXXXY,

which causes cognitive
and physical challenges.

49,XXXXY is not considered heritable.

And Spencer has enriched
our lives in many ways.

But understanding the challenges he faced,

we chose to have genetic testing
before trying for a second child,

and those tests revealed no concerns.

That’s our daughter Tatum,
kissing her older brother on the cheek.

She’s pretty spectacular.

When we found out we were pregnant
with her, we were ecstatic.

Then our obstetrician
gave us the diagnosis

of monoamniotic-monochorionic twins,

something that disrupted
what we hoped would be a normal pregnancy,

instead resulting in the loss of one twin

and Tatum being born

with a life-threatening abdominal wall
birth defect called an omphalocele.

Tatum was just a few hours old
when I took this picture.

I’d just finished meeting
with the medical team

that would soon perform the first of many
surgeries to correct her birth defects.

And during that meeting,
the nurse on the team looked at me

and asked a question I’ll never forget.

“Mr. Watkins, it just doesn’t make sense

that both your children
have these challenges.

But we see you farm for a living.

Where does your family get their water?”

The team’s concern was that
my children’s birth defects

can be caused by endocrine disruption
from exposure to drinking water

polluted with the millions of pounds
of pesticides and synthetic fertilizers

used to grow Iowa’s corn and soybeans.

Nitrogen fertilizer and the herbicide
glyphosate are suspected disrupters.

Six and a half million pounds
of the herbicide atrazine,

a proven endocrine disruptor,

are applied to Iowa’s crops
every single year.

Now, I’m not an organic farmer.

I use some of these products,

and I think It’s important
we learn to farm

without chemicals
and synthetic fertilizer.

But it’s critical we farm in ways
that keep them out of our water.

Fact is,

our water treatment plant operators
are the unsung heroes of this state,

but there’s only so much they can do.

[Atrazine 6.5 million lbs]

I’ll probably never know for sure

if farm chemicals
caused my children’s birth defects.

But I can’t prove they didn’t.

What I can prove is that
Iowa’s farmers can be productive

and keep these poisons out of our water.

Tatum and Spencer’s health challenges
reveal the real problem we must address,

which is a failing food system
that needlessly exploits people

and nature to secure the food we eat.

And sadly, it’s human nature
that drives this problem.

E.O. Wilson’s insight is that our power

to make the most of immediate
opportunities can be institutionalized,

making it very difficult
to change entrenched behavior

when we learn how to do things better.

Technology is important,

but just because we can
doesn’t mean we should.

The technology of synthetic fertilizer

masks the degradation of our soil
while polluting our water.

Technologies such as antibiotics
have allowed us to confine livestock.

These are both short-term solutions
with long-term consequences.

Often it’s our technology
that holds us back

from the sustainable solutions we need
to fix our failing food system,

creating more problems
for others downstream, literally.

Institutions such as slavery

and our government’s genocide
of Native Americans

on behalf of farming settlers

were reinforced by the primitive emotions

that make us accept
the destruction of natural resources

and exploitation of others

as justified in securing
our self-interest.

And we see the senseless influence
of these emotions, institutions

and God-like technology
in our food system today

with the treatment of essential workers
in Iowa’s packing plants.

I feel this influence when my own industry
lobbies to keep atrazine on the market,

telling me to care more
about the corn I raise

than the health of my family.

We see the destruction of resources
essential to the success of our state

with the fact that soil
erosion is happening

at 16 times the rate of soil generation,

leading to sedimentation of our water,
nutrient pollution and habitat loss,

resulting in over a third
of all Iowa species being in decline.

And we justify this soil loss
and nutrient pollution

because the chemicals and synthetic
fertilizers that were used

are necessary to drive high yields.

Yet these yields cannot be environmentally
or economically sustained.

In my lifetime,
there have only been nine years

where the price of corn
actually exceeded the cost of production,

with Farm Bill entitlements,
supported by your tax dollars,

making up the difference.

Iowa’s farmers once raised
157 different crops

and received no subsidies.

Today, we raise predominantly two crops:

corn and soy,

and receive over a billion
dollars a year in entitlements.

I’m a farmer, and I receive
these subsidies.

But you deserve clean water and healthy
soil for your investment in me.

Fixing our failing food system

has to start with prioritizing
both stewardship and social equity.

These issues are intertwined

and we can’t successfully
address one without the other.

Without stewardship we’ll continue
to erode our state’s natural resources,

creating a future
of scarcity and conflict.

These conditions will never
allow for social equity.

Yet when we ignore the inequality

and exploitation inherent
in our food system,

we create a vicious cycle
that’s only made possible by rationalizing

that what we’re doing is acceptable.

I’m a fourth generation
white, male landowner.

I’ve never been excluded from USDA loans
or programs for the color of my skin.

I’ve never been forced to work
in a covid-infected environment

to sustain a failing food system.

The injustice of our food system
is on people who don’t own land.

It’s on people who are
essential but invisible,

working in our packing plants, dairies

and picking our fruits
and vegetables for poverty wages.

And it’s on families
who can’t afford nutritious food,

because we subsidize the wrong things.

When it comes to social equity,
my role is to listen,

learn and support a system
where all people can thrive.

Farm stewardship is something
I do understand.

The reason I’m standing here today

is 23 years ago
in the middle of a blizzard,

I finally decided to trust my gut

and start focusing on stewardship
instead of production.

Until that fateful blizzard,

my farming practices were inspired

by the embodiment
of manifest destiny himself.

Secretary of Agriculture Earl Butz, who
in 1971 when I was just two years old,

told farmers to get big or get out.

His directive was to use the modern
technological package of chemicals,

equipment and synthetic fertilizer to
maximize our production of commodities.

Yield above all else.

Until that blizzard, I did my best
to follow Mr. Butz’s advice.

Farming with a total focus on production.

My attitude was modern technology
and determination

could conquer anything
Mother Nature threw my way.

Oh, I saw things that concerned me:

muddy streams,

fewer birds,

wildflowers on our landscape.

Practice that always concerned me

was having my cows calve
in February and early March.

Industry wisdom was that
by getting calving out of the way early,

I could dedicate my labor
to planting corn in April

and have bigger calves
to sell in the fall,

which, to an ag economist,
probably looked good on paper.

But seeing a shivering, muddy baby calf

on a cold, wet, miserable, snowy March day

never looked good to me.

But when your industry experts are telling
you to maximize your production

to feed a hungry world,

it’s hard to trust your gut,

even when you see things that concern you.

Then on March 11, 1998,

the blizzard struck
in the middle of calving season.

Within hours, the temperature fell
from 60 to below zero,

15 inches of snow,
sustained 40 mile per hour winds.

I worked around the clock
sheltering cows in chaos.

This miserable experience was
the inspiration I needed to trust my gut

and ask the most important
question of my career.

“Why am I working against Mother Nature?”

What I really wanted was clean water,
healthy soil and happy cows.

And this meant switching my focus
from production to stewardship.

If the experts right and I went broke
with this new approach, so be it.

I’d had enough.

And I just wanted to do right
by the cows and the land.

I started by moving
my calving season to April.

The warmer April weather reduced my costs,

and this small change
made wonderful things happen.

The warmer April weather reduced
my costs for fuel, equipment and feed,

and allowing the cows to express
their natural instincts

by calving on warm green pastures
instead of cold, muddy lots,

reduced their stress
and increased their productivity.

Instead of going broke, making a happy cow
made my farm profitable,

kick-starting a beautiful relationship
with Mother Nature.

And over time I’ve worked
to build a system

that reduces my reliance
on finite resources

by enhancing the biodiversity
and natural resources

that truly sustain my farm.

Five pieces of this system
with the greatest impact so far

include no-till.

This is placed in seed directly
in the ground without tillage,

which reduces soil erosion
as well as fuel and equipment costs.

Second,

by diversifying my corn-soy rotation
to include oats, clover and alfalfa,

I’ve enriched my soil
and enhanced biodiversity.

Iowa State University research shows
multi-species crop rotations

greatly reduce my chemical needs,
nitrogen fertilizer needs, soil erosion

and fossil fuel needs,

improving my bottom line
by working with nature.

Yet our farm bill subsidizes
the production of commodities,

not the regeneration
of the resources we depend upon,

sending a very confusing message
to farmers wanting to apply this research

and do the right thing.

The third piece of my system
is cover crops.

Prior to harvest, I use a helicopter
to fly rye into standing corn.

This will regenerate my soil’s
organic matter in the winter

with a blanket of living plants,

actively pulling carbon
from the atmosphere

while keeping nutrients
on my farm and out of our water.

I mean, come on,
farming with a helicopter,

regenerating our soil
and protecting our water?

I’ve got the greatest job ever!

(Laughter)

The fourth piece of my system
and my favorite

is farming with nature
to enhance wild species.

Prairie strips are a perfect example.

By strategically restoring
prairie to my fields,

I have been able to improve
my return on investment.

And bring birds, wildflowers
and pollinators back to our landscape,

while the deep prairie roots
restore my soil and protect our water.

And finally, I integrate the cows
back into my cropping system in the winter

to graze the cover crops, recycling
the nutrients my next crop will require.

It’s the golden rule of agronomy.

If you take something off the land,
you must replace it.

A cow is perfect for this.

(Laughter)

High-quality forage in the front,
high-quality nutrients out the back.

I think you get the picture.

Stewardship has made my farm
sustainable for three reasons.

First, it’s profitable,

and there is no sustainability
without profit.

Second, it makes
my farm ecologically sound.

Farms are living systems.

Living systems are sustained
by natural resources:

soil, sunlight, rainfall
and the knowledge they all work together.

Our farms can’t be sustained
by finite resources:

fossil fuel, chemicals, equipment.

Because over time
the cost of these resources

will exceed the cost
of the products I raise.

A better way of saying this is that
my role as a farmer is not to produce.

My role is to care for the land.

And when I do this properly,
the land can provide for us all.

And third, stewardship
makes my farm socially responsible.

We all deserve clean, safe water.

Farming with nature

regenerates and protects
the natural resources we all depend upon,

ensuring that the water
that leaves my farm is safe.

Creating a bright future for Tatum
and Spencer means everything to me.

I can’t undo the past.

But together we can address
the failures in our food system

and give all of our children
the bright future they deserve.

But the reality is, as it stands today,

our food system,
which we’re all a part of,

continues to needlessly
exploit people and nature

in ways that are harmful
to our communities,

our families and our environment
for the sake of yield.

That’s me sitting on
my grandmother’s Shambaugh’s lap.

Her legacy in founding
what would become 4-H

reassures me that we can fix
our failing food system.

Her work proved that
when we strive to make our best better,

agriculture can be a force for good.

Exploiting and excluding others,
treating people as less than

does not make our best better.

Destroying our natural resources
does not make our best better.

Embracing social equity and diversity
makes our best better.

Regenerating and protecting
our natural resources

makes our best better.

When we focus on stewardship
and social equity,

we build better farms.

When we build better farms,
we build better communities.

And when we build better communities,
we build a better future.

This is a legacy we can all be proud of,

and this is the legacy
our children deserve.

(Applause) (Cheers)

抄写员:Thảo Nguyên Nguyễn
审稿人:Rhonda Jacobs

谢谢大家今天的邀请。

我想向您介绍
两个非常特别的人,

他们通过与生俱来的挑战

帮助我
从不同的角度看待我们的食品系统。

这是我的儿子,斯宾塞。

他出生时患有一种罕见的综合症,
称为 49,XXXXY,

这会导致认知
和身体方面的挑战。

49,XXXXY 不被认为是可遗传的。

斯宾塞
在许多方面丰富了我们的生活。

但了解他面临的挑战后,

我们选择
在尝试生第二个孩子之前进行基因检测

,这些检测显示没有问题。

那是我们的女儿塔图姆,
亲吻她哥哥的脸颊。

她非常壮观。

当我们发现我们怀
了她时,我们欣喜若狂。

然后我们的产科医生
给我们诊断

出单羊膜-单绒毛膜双胞胎,

这扰乱
了我们原本希望的正常怀孕,

反而导致一对双胞胎失去,

而塔图姆出生时

患有危及生命的腹壁
出生缺陷,称为脐膨出。

当我拍这张照片时,塔图姆只有几个小时大。

我刚刚
与医疗团队会面

,他们很快就会进行许多手术中的第一个,
以纠正她的出生缺陷。

在那次会议
上,团队中的护士看着我

,问了一个我永远不会忘记的问题。

“先生。 沃特金斯,你的

两个孩子
都有这些挑战是没有意义的。

但我们看到你以农场为生。

你家的水哪里来的?”

该团队担心的是,
我的孩子的出生缺陷

可能是由于
接触

被用于种植爱荷华州玉米和大豆的数百万磅杀虫剂和合成肥料污染的饮用水造成的内分泌紊乱。

氮肥和除草剂
草甘膦被怀疑是干扰物。

每年有 650 万
磅除草剂阿特拉津(

一种经证实的内分泌干扰物)

用于爱荷华州的
农作物。

现在,我不是有机农民。

我使用其中一些产品

,我认为重要的是
我们学会在

没有化学品
和合成肥料的情况下耕种。

但至关重要的是,我们以
使它们远离水源的方式进行耕作。

事实上,

我们的水处理厂操作员
是这个州的无名英雄,

但他们能做的只有这么多。

[阿特拉津 650 万磅]

我可能永远无法

确定农用化学品是否会
导致我孩子的出生缺陷。

但我无法证明他们没有。

我能证明的是,
爱荷华州的农民可以提高生产力

,并将这些毒物从我们的水中排除。

塔图姆和斯宾塞的健康挑战
揭示了我们必须解决的真正问题,

这是一个失败的食品系统
,它不必要地利用

人和自然来确保我们吃的食物。

可悲的
是,驱动这个问题的是人性。

E.O. 威尔逊的见解是,

我们充分利用眼前
机会的能力可以制度化,

当我们学会如何把事情做得更好时,很难改变根深蒂固的行为。

技术很重要,

但仅仅因为我们可以
并不意味着我们应该这样做。

合成肥料技术

掩盖了我们土壤的退化,
同时污染了我们的水。

抗生素
等技术使我们能够限制牲畜。

这些都是具有长期后果的短期解决方案

通常,是我们的技术
阻碍了我们解决我们失败

的食品系统所需的可持续解决方案

从而
给下游的其他人带来更多问题,从字面上看。

诸如奴隶制

和我们的政府

代表农业定居者对美洲原住民进行的种族灭绝等制度

被原始情绪强化了,这些原始情绪

使我们
接受破坏自然资源

和剥削他人

的行为,以确保
我们的自身利益是正当的。

我们看到
这些情绪、制度

和神一般的技术
对我们今天的食品系统产生的无意义的影响,以及

爱荷华州包装厂的基本工人的待遇。

当我自己的行业
游说将阿特拉津留在市场上时,我感受到了这种影响,

告诉我更
关心我种植的玉米而

不是我家人的健康。

我们看到了
对我们国家成功至关重要的资源的破坏

,因为土壤
侵蚀的发生

速度是土壤生成速度的 16 倍,

导致我们的水沉积、
养分污染和栖息地丧失,

导致超过三分之一
的 爱荷华州物种正在减少。

我们证明了这种土壤流失
和养分污染

是合理的,因为所使用的化学品和合成
肥料

对于提高产量是必要的。

然而,这些产量不能在环境
或经济上维持。

在我的一生中,
只有

九年玉米的价格
实际上超过了生产成本

,农业法案的权利,
由你的税收支持,

弥补了差额。

爱荷华州的农民曾经种植了
157 种不同的作物

,但没有获得任何补贴。

今天,我们主要种植两种作物:

玉米和大豆

,每年获得超过 10 亿
美元的权利。

我是农民,我收到
这些补贴。

但你应该为我的投资而获得干净的水和健康的
土壤。

修复我们失败的食品系统

必须从优先考虑
管理和社会公平开始。

这些问题是相互交织的

,如果没有另一个,我们就无法成功
解决一个问题。

如果没有管理,我们将
继续侵蚀我们国家的自然资源,

创造一个
稀缺和冲突的未来。

这些条件永远不会
允许社会公平。

然而,当我们忽视食物系统中固有的不平等

和剥削时

我们就会创造一个恶性循环
,只有

合理化我们正在做的事情是可以接受的,这种循环才有可能发生。

我是第四代
白人男性地主。

我从来没有因为
我的肤色而被美国农业部贷款或计划排除在外。

我从未被迫
在新冠病毒感染的环境中工作

以维持失败的食品系统。

我们粮食系统的不公正在于
没有土地的人。

这是

在我们的包装厂、乳制品厂

和采摘水果
和蔬菜以赚取贫困工资的重要但不可见的人身上。

而且是
那些买不起营养食物的家庭,

因为我们补贴了错误的东西。

在社会公平方面,
我的职责是倾听、

学习和支持一个
所有人都能茁壮成长的系统。

农场管理是
我理解的。

我今天站在这里的原因

是 23 年前
的一场暴风雪,

我终于决定相信自己的直觉

,开始专注于管理
而不是生产。

直到那场决定性的暴风雪,

我的农耕实践都

受到了
天命本身的化身的启发。

农业部长厄尔·布茨(Earl Butz)
在 1971 年我只有两岁的时候

告诉农民要么做大要么退出。

他的指示是使
用化学品、

设备和合成肥料的现代技术包来
最大化我们的商品生产。

产量高于一切。

在那场暴风雪之前,我尽了最大
努力听从巴茨先生的建议。

以生产为重心的农业。

我的态度是现代技术
和决心

可以征服
大自然母亲扔给我的任何东西。

哦,我看到了让我担心的事情:

泥泞的溪流,

更少的鸟类,

我们风景中的野花。

我一直关心的练习是

在二月和三月初让我的牛产犊。

行业智慧是,
通过提早产犊,

我可以在 4 月份将我的精力
用于种植玉米,

并在秋季有更大的
犊牛出售

,对于农业经济学家来说,这
在纸面上可能看起来不错。

但是,

在寒冷、潮湿、悲惨、下雪的三月天,

看到一只浑身发抖、浑身是泥的小牛犊对我来说从来都不是一件好事。

但是,当您的行业专家告诉
您要最大限度地提高产量

以养活饥饿的世界

时,即使您看到与您有关的事情,也很难相信您的直觉。

然后在 1998 年 3 月 11 日

,暴风雪袭击
了产犊季节的中期。

几小时内,气温
从 60 度降至零以下,

积雪 15 英寸,
风速为每小时 40 英里。

我夜以继日地工作,
在混乱中保护奶牛。

这种悲惨的经历是
我需要相信自己的直觉

并提出
我职业生涯中最重要的问题所需的灵感。

“我为什么要与大自然作对?”

我真正想要的是干净的水、
健康的土壤和快乐的奶牛。

这意味着将我的重点
从生产转向管理。

如果专家们是对的,而我打破
了这种新方法,那就这样吧。

我受够了。

我只是想
在奶牛和土地上做正确的事。

我首先将
产犊季节移至四月。

四月温暖的天气降低了我的成本,

而这个小小的改变
让美好的事情发生了。

四月温暖的天气降低了
我的燃料、设备和饲料成本

,让奶牛

通过在温暖的绿色牧场
而不是寒冷、泥泞的牧场产犊来表达它们的自然本能,

减轻了它们的压力
并提高了它们的生产力。

养一头快乐的母牛
让我的农场盈利,而不是破产,与

大自然建立了美好的关系

随着时间的推移,我
努力建立一个系统

通过增强真正维持我农场的生物多样性
和自然资源

,减少我对有限资源的依赖。


系统迄今为止影响最大的五个部分

包括免耕。

无需耕作,直接将种子
放入地下,

从而减少土壤侵蚀
以及燃料和设备成本。

其次,

通过使我的玉米-大豆轮作多样化
,包括燕麦、三叶草和紫花苜蓿,

我丰富了我的土壤
并增强了生物多样性。

爱荷华州立大学的研究表明,
多品种轮作

极大地减少了我的化学需求、
氮肥需求、土壤侵蚀

和化石燃料需求,通过与自然合作

提高了我的底线

然而,我们的农业法案补贴
了商品的生产,

而不是
我们所依赖的资源的再生,这

给想要应用这项研究

并做正确事情的农民发出了一个非常令人困惑的信息。

我系统的第三部分
是覆盖作物。

在收获之前,我使用直升机
将黑麦飞入站立的玉米中。

这将
在冬天

用一层活植物再生我土壤的有机物质,

积极
从大气中

吸收碳,同时将养分
留在我的农场和我们的水中。

我的意思是,来吧,
用直升机耕种,

再生我们的土壤
和保护我们的水?

我得到了有史以来最伟大的工作!

(笑声)

我系统的第四个部分,
也是我最喜欢的部分

是与自然一起耕作,
以增强野生物种。

草原地带就是一个很好的例子。

通过战略性地将
草原恢复到我的田地,

我已经能够提高
我的投资回报率。

将鸟类、野花
和传粉媒介带回我们的土地,

而草原深处的根系则
恢复了我的土壤并保护了我们的水源。

最后,我
在冬天将奶牛重新整合到我的种植系统中,

以放牧覆盖作物,回收
下一次作物所需的养分。

这是农学的黄金法则。

如果你从土地上拿走东西,
你必须更换它。

一头牛是完美的。

(笑声)

优质草料在前,
优质营养在后。

我想你明白了。

管理使我的农场
可持续发展有三个原因。

首先,它是有利可图的

,没有利润就没有可持续性

其次,它使
我的农场生态健康。

农场是生命系统。

生命系统
由自然资源维持:

土壤、阳光、降雨
和它们共同作用的知识。

我们的农场不能
靠有限的资源来维持:

化石燃料、化学品、设备。

因为随着时间的推移
,这些资源

的成本将超过
我筹集的产品的成本。

更好的说法是,
我作为农民的角色不是生产。

我的职责是照顾土地。

当我正确地做到这一点时,
这片土地可以供我们所有人使用。

第三,管理
使我的农场对社会负责。

我们都应该得到干净、安全的水。

与自然一起耕作可以

再生和保护
我们都依赖的自然资源,

确保离开我农场的水是安全的。

为塔图姆和斯宾塞创造光明的未来
对我来说意味着一切。

我无法挽回过去。

但是,我们可以一起解决
我们食品系统中的失败问题,

并为我们所有的孩子提供
他们应得的光明未来。

但现实是,就目前而言

,我们都是其中的一部分,我们的粮食系统

继续以

对我们的社区、

我们的家庭和我们的
环境有害的方式不必要地剥削人类和自然,以提高产量。

那是我坐在
祖母的 Shambaugh 腿上。


创立 4-H 的遗产

让我确信我们可以
修复失败的食品系统。

她的工作证明,
当我们努力做到最好时,

农业可以成为一种向善的力量。

剥削和排斥他人,
视他人为低级

并不能使我们变得更好。

破坏我们的自然资源
并不能使我们变得更好。

拥抱社会公平和多样性
使我们变得更好。

再生和保护
我们的自然资源

使我们变得更好。

当我们专注于管理
和社会公平时,

我们就会建立更好的农场。

当我们建立更好的农场时,
我们就建立了更好的社区。

当我们建立更好的社区时,
我们就建立了一个更美好的未来。

这是我们都可以引以为豪

的遗产,也是
我们的孩子应得的遗产。

(掌声)(欢呼)