Otro camino contra el hambre

Translator: Gisela Giardino
Reviewer: Sebastian Betti

Way more food is wasted

than what is needed
to eradicate hunger.

And it’s wasted for incredible reasons.

Because it’s aesthetically unpleasant.

Imagine this tomato
half green, half red,

or this crooked carrot.

They seldom reach
supermarkets, retailers,

because they think we won’t buy them.

Food is wasted because,
for example, its packaging is broken.

And it’s wasted even though,
individually,

the packages are closed.

Or if there’s loose food.

Food is wasted
because it’s about to expire.

Imagine a box of milk
about to expire on Tuesday.

Nobody buys it on a Sunday.

That’s a lot of food,
it’s a huge amount of food.

It is more than a third
of the world’s production.

It’s over 1.3 billion tons.

However, more than 2 billion people

don’t have the money to buy
a portion of healthy food every day,

and suffer from what’s called
food insecurity.

How come?

This was the question we asked ourselves
with a group of friends

and we tried to think ways
to contribute to the solution.

We started out with the typical model
of traditional assistentialism,

with volunteers and donated food

which is delivered to food kitchens.

When we started learning,
as we worked on it,

we realized that this model
has two key problems.

The first is that
little healthy food arrives.

Because for producers, in general,

is cheaper to throw away the food
than to donate it.

Think of a producer
of fruit and vegetables,

that leaves the produce on the ground
because they can’t afford the costs

of picking it up and taking it
to a donation center.

Or an industrial producer
who throws away food

instead of donating due to the costly
logistics to make it accessible.

This especially happens in countries

where there are no tax incentives
to donate food,

like ours.

So, if you want access to healthy food

you have to buy it, there’s no other way.

The second key problem is that
since everything is donated,

the time people work is also donated.

They are volunteers who make
an amazing job, for sure,

but they don’t guarantee
the quality standards

to make it work over time.

To make it sustainable.

You need professional people,

who is trained in food handling,

who is licensed to transport food
professionally.

You can’t ask a volunteer
a Saturday at 3 a.m.

to fetch food and deliver it
to a food kitchen,

or ask a person to go
on a rainy Sunday or in flooding.

If you want a service that guarantees
the quality standard you require

so that the food arrives
safely where it has to,

you need to pay for that.

There’s no option.

We realized, too,

that the gift comes out expensive.

That being poor is more expensive.

That low-income people

pay for most of the food they consume.

Only a small fraction is donated.

And finally, the truth is that

because a little amount of the food
they get is donated,

they end up paying it higher
than the rest of us

due to the amount of intermediaries.

They pay more for food;
being poor is more expensive.

And because it’s more expensive
they end up buying lower quality foods

which are cheaper.

And that only perpetuates
the malnutrition cycle.

We learned that the model
of donations and volunteering

is great for when
there is an emergency,

like COVID just showed.

But it’s not enough to get people out
of this macabre lock-up

that keeps them poor and poorly fed.

On this journey, we learned
that we need to have professional people,

dedicated 24/7 to contribute
to solving a giant problem:

hunger.

So, we needed to have people
investing in research and development,

in technology, in developing processes

that would guarantee
sustainability over time.

We realized that to have all this

you have to pay for those services.

And so we brought in
this alternative idea,

to add to those already existent,

that the market is
a very powerful means

for social and nutritional impact.

If we can generate the resources

to later reinvest them
on a social mission

that can make people have access
to cheaper and good quality food,

then we would make them save on costs
compared to what they already pay today.

That’s why we created a company.

A professional company
for a guaranteed distribution of food

in low-income neighborhoods.

And we eliminated the intermediaries.

And we managed to offer
healthy, cheap food,

at a lower price than they pay today.

It has a digital ecosystem
that works like this:

we upload the food that
we have available to an app,

food we buy from producers

to prevent the food from getting spoiled,

and we offer it through the app
to the food kitchens

and clients from the private sector

running sustainability campaigns.

We manage the logistics of the delivery.

We guarantee an end-to-end traceability
of the operation

and we’ve already completed
more than 8500 deliveries

to more than 1800 food kitchens,

that feed about 130,000 people.

We’re operating in Argentina, Guatemala,

Mexico and Puerto Rico.

And we learned in this journey

that the market is very powerful
instrument for social impact.

We learned that
if you don’t have the means

there’s not going to be any less hunger,
there’s going to be more hunger.

The enemy, the devil,
it’s not the money, it’s hunger.

译者:Gisela Giardino
审稿人:Sebastian

Betti 浪费的食物多于

消除饥饿所需的食物。

它被浪费的原因令人难以置信。

因为它在美学上令人不快。

想象一下这个番茄
半绿半红,

或者这个弯曲的胡萝卜。

他们很少到达
超市、零售商,

因为他们认为我们不会购买它们。

食物被浪费是因为
例如包装破损。

即使单独关闭包裹,它也被浪费

了。

或者如果有松散的食物。

食物被浪费了,
因为它即将过期。

想象一盒
牛奶将于周二到期。

没有人在星期天买它。

这是很多食物,
这是一个巨大的食物量。


的产量占世界产量的三分之一以上。

超过13亿吨。

然而,超过 20 亿人

没有钱每天购买
一份健康食品,

并遭受着所谓的
粮食不安全的困扰。

怎么来的?

这是我们和一群朋友问自己的问题

,我们试图想办法
为解决方案做出贡献。

我们从传统辅助主义的典型模式开始

志愿者和捐赠的

食物被送到食品厨房。

当我们开始学习时,
随着我们的工作,

我们意识到这个模型
有两个关键问题。

首先是
很少的健康食品来了。

因为对于生产者来说,一般来说,

扔掉食物
比捐赠食物更便宜。

想想一个
水果和蔬菜的生产商,

他们把农产品留在地上,
因为他们负担不起

捡起
来送到捐赠中心的费用。

或者是一个工业生产者

由于成本高昂的
物流使其易于获取而丢弃食物而不是捐赠。

这尤其发生在像我们

这样没有税收优惠
来捐赠食物的国家

因此,如果您想获得健康食品

,就必须购买它,别无他法。

第二个关键问题是,
既然一切都是捐赠的,

那么人们工作的时间也是捐赠的。

当然,他们是
做出了不起的工作的志愿者,

但他们不
保证质量标准

使其随着时间的推移而发挥作用。

使其可持续。

您需要

受过食品处理培训

并获得专业运输食品许可的
专业人员。

你不能
在周六凌晨 3 点

让志愿者去取食物并将其
送到食品厨房,

或者让一个人
在下雨的周日或洪水中去。

如果您想要一项服务来保证
您所需的质量标准,

以便食物
安全到达目的地,

您需要为此付费。

没有选择。

我们也意识到,

礼物的价格昂贵。

贫穷更昂贵。

低收入人群

为他们消费的大部分食物买单。

只有一小部分被捐赠。

最后,事实是,

由于他们获得的食物中有少量
是捐赠的,由于中间人的数量,

他们最终支付的费用
高于我们其他人

他们花更多的钱买食物;
贫穷更昂贵。

而且因为它更贵,
他们最终会购买

更便宜的低质量食品。

而这只会
延续营养不良的循环。

我们了解到,
捐赠和志愿服务

的模式非常适合
在紧急情况下使用,

就像 COVID 刚刚展示的那样。

但这还不足以让人们摆脱

这种让他们贫穷和吃不饱的可怕禁闭。

在这段旅程中,我们
了解到我们需要专业人士,

24/7 全天候
致力于解决一个巨大的问题:

饥饿。

因此,我们需要让人们
投资于研发

、技术和开发流程

,以保证
随着时间的推移可持续发展。

我们意识到,要拥有所有这些,

您必须为这些服务付费。

因此,我们引入
了另一种想法,

以补充已经存在的想法,

即市场是
产生

社会和营养影响的非常强大的手段。

如果我们能够产生资源

,以后再投资
于一项社会使命

,使人们能够获得
更便宜、更优质的食物,

那么
与他们今天已经支付的费用相比,我们会让他们节省成本。

这就是我们创建公司的原因。

一家在低收入社区
保证食品分配的专业公司

我们消除了中间商。

我们设法

以低于他们今天支付的价格提供健康、廉价的食品。

它有一个像这样工作的数字生态系统

:我们将可用的食物上传
到应用程序,

我们从生产商那里购买食物

以防止食物变质,

然后通过应用程序
将其提供给食品厨房

和客户 私营部门

开展可持续发展运动。

我们管理交付的物流。

我们保证操作的端到端可追溯性

,我们已经完成

向 1800 多个食品厨房的 8500 多次交付,为

大约 130,000 人提供食物。

我们在阿根廷、危地马拉、

墨西哥和波多黎各开展业务。

我们在这次旅程

中了解到,市场是
产生社会影响的非常强大的工具。

我们了解到,
如果你没有办法

,饥饿感不会减少,饥饿感
就会增加。

敌人,魔鬼
,不是金钱,而是饥饿。