What We Get Wrong When We Think About Food Insecurity

i

am an incredibly

lucky person

i grew up in a stable home

i didn’t have to worry about whether or

not there would be food in the fridge

or if my parents would be able to pay

the bills

i grew up isolated from food insecurity

but i thought i understood what it was

like many of us then my first

understandings of food insecurity came

from interacting with food charities and

food banks

my parents would bundle my siblings and

i into the car

and we would go downtown to pack boxes

at the food bank or serve meals at the

soup kitchen

i remember looking around those spaces

and recognizing that

a lot of the folks who were accessing

these services looked like me

and my siblings most were not white

at school and at church we would run

food drives during the holidays and we

were told

that this was how to ensure that folks

who didn’t have enough food

got enough to eat when it came to the

issue of food insecurity

the solution was more food banks and

more food drives and more soup kitchens

but this message is wrong

although these services do provide

important supports

to families who need emergency food

they do not solve the long-term problem

of food insecurity

since then i have learned that the

issue the roots of food insecurity are

buried much

deeper and that we can’t talk about food

insecurity in canada

without also talking about poverty and

racism

food insecurity is defined as inadequate

or insufficient access to food

due to financial constraints

the thing that you need to remember

about this definition is

that the root of food insecurity is a

lack

of access to money

for folks who are food insecure this can

mean having to make some incredibly

difficult choices like choosing between

the

food medicine or household goods that

they need for themselves and their

families

and paying rent at the end of the month

this also means that if we can find a

solution to food insecurity

that puts enough money in people’s

pockets

alongside a robust universally

accessible network of social programs

we’ll be well on our way to finding a

solution to food insecurity

and a whole host of other social

problems

racism also impacts food insecurity in

canada

food insecurity exists for the same

reasons that

poverty exists and poverty does not

impact everyone equally they both

trace their roots to systems of

oppression that work

together to determine who experiences

the most food insecurity

and who gets to be at the table in

conversations about the solutions to

food insecurity

examining this problem and its solutions

is part of what’s called food justice

work and this is work that i’m involved

in

alongside an organization called

foodshare toronto

it is difficult work that requires that

we go a lot further in addressing food

insecurity

than opening up a few more food banks

it is work that seeks justice and food

security

for everyone fuchsia toronto

runs community-led food access

programming

across the city of toronto these

programs are designed

to be universal so that anyone who needs

to can access

but we also recognize that certain

communities

like the black and indigenous community

for example face greater

barriers than others for example

in our good food program which sells

affordable fruits and vegetables

across the city we have always noticed

that there were

a greater number of non-white folks

accessing the program

turns out it’s not just because we have

the best prices

on okra and kalalu

we recognize that systemic racism

is one of the factors that holds food

insecurity in place but we in the

communities that we work alongside

have often lacked the race-based data to

reinforce these observations

to address this issue in 2019

foodshare partnered with the proof food

insecurity

research team at the university of

toronto to

engage in one of the first ever studies

of

canada community health survey data

looking

specifically through the lens of race

the question that drove this study was

how

do black and white households differ in

their risk

of food insecurity

the results of the study matched what

community leaders in the black community

had been saying

for decades and already knew

when the study looked at food insecurity

and compared between black and white

households in canada it found that

10 percent of white households are food

insecure

compared with 28

of black households the study also found

that black households are

3.5 times more likely to be food

insecure than white households

the study also looked at household

composition

and found that for white households if

you

own your home or if you live in a

two-parent household

then you are less likely to be food

insecure than if you rent your home

or live in a single-parent household but

if you are black the risk of food

insecurity remains

significantly higher regardless of

whether you rent or own your home

and regardless of your household

composition

these results suggest that the increased

food insecurity

found within the black community in

canada is at least

in part due to the additional barriers

that these households face

because they are black

this demonstrates the impact of

structural racism and anti-black

racism in canada and how it makes it

more difficult for black folks to access

wealth leaving us at greater risk

of food insecurity

structural racism is a form of racism

that is embedded as a normalized

practice in a society

or institution and it’s best understood

through examples of how

it works structural racism

in the education system makes it less

likely for non-white folks to graduate

from high school or be accepted into

post-secondary institutions

structural racism in the hiring process

makes it less likely for non-white folks

to be hired to well-paying

stable positions structural racism in

the financial sector

makes it less likely for non-white folks

to be

approved for a loan if they need one

if somebody belongs to a community that

is

less likely to be able to succeed in the

education system

is less likely to be able to access a

well-paying stable job

and is less likely to be approved for a

loan

when they need one that person is almost

certainly going to be at greater risk of

food

insecurity that is what we are seeing

in these statistics

so how does that impact how we think

about the solutions to this problem

if we accept that food insecurity is

linked to poverty and that poverty is

linked to structural racism

then we must change how individuals

organizations and institutions think

about the solutions to this problem

if the problem is actually about money

then the solutions

must also be about money and how to get

more of it into the pockets of people

who need it

the government likes to frame food

charities and food banks as an effective

way to respond

to food insecurity as somebody who works

for a charitable food organization

myself

i will be the first to tell you that we

are never

going to be able to solve this problem

we

already struggle to access the resources

that we need

and the scale and scope of problems like

food insecurity

are well beyond the ability of any

organization to be able to solve

in fact it is the government that bears

responsibility

to uphold this commitment

in 1976 the canadian government signed

on to what’s called the international

covenant

on economic social and cultural rights

this document contained a commitment by

the government to create the conditions

under which everyone in canada could

feed themselves

and their communities with dignity today

and

into the future but when we look around

today

we can immediately see that the

government has not upheld this

commitment

especially in communities

disproportionately impacted by food

insecurity

in framing food banks and food charities

as an effective solution to this problem

the government is running away from its

commitment to uphold the right to food

and we should not accept

this response all of us

in canada our friends our parents

our neighbors we all have the right to

hold our elected officials responsible

to this commitment

anyone can pick up the phone and call

their local representative

to demand that they do more to address

issues of food insecurity

and to push other elected

representatives to do the same

this sort of public advocacy work is

so powerful because only the government

has the power and the resources to do

things like

increase minimum wages or implement

a universal pharmacare program or a

universal basic housing guarantee

alongside perhaps a universal basic

income

the sorts of systemic changes

that will actually address problems like

food insecurity

but what can organizations do to address

this issue in addition to advocating to

government

well for organizations to address the

increased food insecurity

that has been identified in the black

community and that almost

certainly exists in other racialized

communities as well

we must address structural

racism structural racism

leads to greater poverty in the black

community

which leads to greater food insecurity

in the black community

therefore any work that addresses

and dismantles structural racism is also

working towards

increased food insecurity food security

for communities disproportionately

impacted

by these systems

as civil rights leaders have been saying

for decades one key solution

to this challenge is to hire more

black people to stable

well-paid positions of decision making

power within organizations

these positions should not be contract

or temporary and they should include

things like

paid sick leave and health benefits

these sorts of positions are so powerful

because they ensure a steady stream of

long-term

income into a household and provide the

sort of long-term

financial stability that low-paying or

contract work

simply cannot provide

these are the sorts of positions that

actually protect households against food

insecurity

but as a result of structural racism

these positions are currently less

likely to go

to black people

for organizations to address this

challenge it’s going to require many of

them to undergo

a substantial change in the way they

operate and i can give you a few

examples of what this might look like

organizations first can begin to collect

and use race-based data to understand

where within their staff and boards of

directors

diversity gaps may currently lie

organizations can also do things like

increasing wages

especially for their lowest paid

positions

and establish wage ratios that limit the

difference between the lowest paid

and highest paid staff members in the

organization

organizations can also reduce reliance

on paid

credentials for their job openings in

recognition of the fact that many

institutions discriminate

in their recruitment process and the

fact that many qualified applicants

simply can’t afford to access these

credentials

organizations can also work

with grassroots community organization

working

alongside communities that face

disproportionate barriers to accessing

the money they need for food

to ensure that calls for job applicants

get reach a wider diversity

of candidates alongside

all of this organizations must continue

to collect

race-based data in order to gauge the

impact of these interventions all of

these suggestions

are designed to reduce the barriers for

black

indigenous and other racialized folks in

navigating

the hiring process

in doing food justice work i have come

to understand that the solutions to food

insecurity

have much less to do with food and

much more to do with dismantling systems

of oppression

like structural racism

we must also remember that any solutions

to food insecurity

must be income based and

be implemented alongside a universal

joined up network of robust social

programs because with enough money in

people’s pockets

and a social safety net that actually

works for everyone

we’ll be in a position to end food

insecurity

and poverty regardless of what community

you come from

we must also remember that it is the

government

that bears the responsibility for making

this happen

but that we as individuals have the

power

and the responsibility to hold our

elected officials accountable to these

commitments

don’t be afraid to call your local

representative

you could do that right after watching

this talk

if they start talking to you about food

banks

or meal programs you can remind them

that these are not the solutions

that are going to eradicate this problem

in the long term

ultimately the solutions are

frustratingly

simple people need to be able to

access the money they need for food

we must get our elected representatives

to understand that the solutions to food

insecurity

must be income based

we must also address the fact that

minority communities

like the black community currently face

greater barriers

due to structural racism

we must get more

black indigenous and other racialized

folks

into stable well-paying positions of

decision-making

power within organizations and we must

all remember that we cannot talk about

food insecurity

without also talking about poverty and

structural

racism if we can manage

to do all of this then perhaps

we’ll be in a position to imagine a

future

in which everyone in canada can feed

themselves

their families and their communities

with dignity

and where food insecurity is a distant

memory

thank you

you

我是一个非常

幸运的人

我在一个稳定的家庭中长大

我不必担心

冰箱里是否有食物,

或者我的父母是否能够

支付账单

我在与食物不安全的环境中长大,

但是 我以为我了解

我们中的许多人的情况,然后我

对粮食不安全的第一次了解

来自与食品慈善机构和

食品银行的互动

或者在施粥处提供饭菜

我记得环顾这些空间,

意识到很多使用

这些服务的人看起来像我

和我的兄弟姐妹,大多数

在学校和教堂都不是白人,我们会

在假期里举办食品活动, 我们

告知这是如何确保

没有足够食物的人

有足够的食物来

解决粮食不安全问题时,

解决方案是更多的食物银行和

更多的食物驱动器和 更多的施食处,

但这个信息是错误的,

尽管这些服务确实为

需要紧急食物的家庭提供了重要的支持,

但它们并没有解决长期

的粮食不安全问题,

从那时起,我了解到

粮食不安全的根源

被埋得

更深 并且我们不能

不谈论贫困和种族主义的情况下谈论加拿大的

粮食不安全 粮食不安全被定义为

由于财务限制而获得食物

的机会不足或不足 关于这个定义,您需要记住的

是食物的根源 不安全感

是粮食不安全的人无法获得资金,这可能

意味着不得不做出一些非常

困难的选择,比如在他们自己和家人需要

食品药品或家庭用品之间做出选择,

并在月底支付房租

这也意味着,如果我们能找到

解决粮食不安全问题的办法

,让人们的

口袋里

有足够的钱 除了一个强大的、普遍

可访问的社会计划网络之外,

我们将顺利找到

解决粮食不安全

和一系列其他社会

问题的方法

种族主义也影响

加拿大的

粮食不安全 粮食不安全的存在与贫困存在的

原因相同,

并且 贫困

对每个人的影响并不均等,他们都

将根源追溯到压迫系统,这些系统

共同决定谁经历

的粮食不安全最

严重,谁在讨论粮食不安全解决方案的对话中参与讨论这个问题及其解决方案

是一部分 在所谓的食品正义

工作中,这是我

与一个名为 foodshare toronto 的组织一起参与的工作,

这是一项艰巨的工作,需要

我们在解决粮食不安全问题上走得更远,而

不是开设更多的食品

银行。 为每个人寻求正义和粮食

安全

fuchsia toronto

开展社区主导的粮食获取

计划

在整个多伦多市,这些

计划

旨在普及,以便任何需要的人都

可以访问,

但我们也认识到,

例如黑人和土著社区等某些社区比其他社区

面临更大的

障碍,例如

在我们出售负担得起的美食计划中

整个城市的水果和蔬菜 我们一直注意到

有更多的非白人参与

该计划

事实证明这不仅仅是因为我们

在秋葵和卡拉鲁上拥有最优惠的价格,

我们认识到系统性种族主义

是影响该计划的因素之一 保持粮食

不安全,但我们在与

我们一起工作的社区

中经常缺乏基于种族的数据来

加强这些观察

以解决这个问题 2019 年

foodshare 与多伦多大学的证明粮食

不安全

研究团队合作,

参与一项

加拿大社区健康调查数据

的首次研究,

专门通过镜头观察

种族问题 推动这项研究的问题是

黑人和白人家庭在

粮食不安全

的风险方面有何不同 研究结果

与黑人社区的社区领袖几十年来

一直在说的内容相吻合

,并且

在研究何时研究粮食不安全时已经知道

比较加拿大的黑人和白人

家庭,发现

10% 的白人家庭粮食

不安全

而黑人家庭的 28% 研究还发现

,黑人家庭

粮食

不安全的可能性是白人家庭

的 3.5 倍。 家庭

组成,

并发现对于白人家庭,

如果您拥有自己的房屋或居住在

双亲家庭中,

那么与您租房或居住在单亲家庭相比,您面临粮食不安全的可能性较小,

如果您是 black

无论您是租房还是拥有自己的房屋

,无论您的家庭如何,粮食不安全的风险仍然显着增加 d

构成

这些结果表明,加拿大

黑人社区内粮食不安全状况的增加

至少部分是由于

这些家庭

因为他们是黑人而面临的额外障碍,

这表明加拿大

结构性种族主义和反黑人

种族主义的影响以及 它如何使

黑人更难获得

财富,使我们面临更大

的粮食不安全风险

结构性种族主义是一种种族主义形式,

它作为一种社会或机构的常态化

做法

而存在,最好

通过

它如何运作的例子来理解结构性种族主义

教育系统中的种族主义

使非白人不太可能

从高中毕业或被

大专院校

录取 金融部门结构性种族主义的立场

使得非白人

获得批准的可能性降低

如果某人属于一个

不太可能在

教育系统

中取得成功的社区,不太可能获得一份

高薪稳定的工作,

并且在他们获得贷款时不太可能获得批准,那么他们是否需要一个

需要一个那个人几乎

肯定会面临更大的

粮食

不安全风险,这就是我们

在这些统计数据中看到的,

那么

如果我们接受粮食不安全

与贫困和 贫困

与结构性种族主义有关,

那么我们必须改变个人

组织和机构

如何看待这个问题

的解决方案

谁需要

它政府喜欢将食品

慈善机构和食品银行作为

应对食品不安全的有效方式作为

为慈善食品组织工作的人 关于

我自己,

我将第一个告诉你,

我们永远无法解决这个问题,

我们

已经在努力获取

我们需要的资源,

而粮食不安全等问题的规模和

范围远远超出任何组织的能力

为了能够

解决实际上是政府有

责任维护这一

承诺 1976 年加拿大政府签署

了所谓的

《经济社会和文化权利国际公约》

该文件包含

政府承诺创造

条件 加拿大的每个人今天和未来都可以有尊严地

养活自己

和他们的社区,

但是当我们今天环顾四周时

我们可以立即看到

政府没有兑现这一

承诺,

特别是在建立

食品银行和食品慈善机构时受到粮食不安全影响不成比例的社区

作为解决这个问题的有效方法,

政府正在运行 违背其

维护食物权的承诺

,我们不应该接受

这种回应 我们

在加拿大的所有人 我们的朋友 我们的父母

我们的邻居 我们都有权要求

我们的民选官员

对这一承诺负责

任何人都可以拿起电话和打电话

their local representative

to demand that they do more to address

issues of food insecurity

and to push other elected

representatives to do the same

this sort of public advocacy work is

so powerful because only the government

has the power and the resources to do

things like

increase minimum 工资或

实施普遍的药品保健计划或

普遍的基本住房保障

以及可能的普遍基本

收入,

这些系统性变化

实际上将解决诸如

粮食不安全之类的

问题,但是除了向政府倡导组织好组织之外,组织可以做些什么来解决这个问题

解决在 t 中确定的

日益严重的粮食不安全问题

黑人

社区,几乎

可以肯定,其他种族化社区也存在

我们必须解决结构性

种族主义结构性种族主义

导致黑人社区更加贫困,导致黑人

社区

粮食不安全

因此任何解决

和消除结构性种族主义的工作也是

受这些

系统不成比例影响的社区努力增加粮食安全 几十年来,民权领袖一直在说

应对这一挑战的一个关键解决方案是雇用更多的

黑人在组织内

担任稳定的高薪决策权职位,

这些职位应该 不是合同

或临时的,它们应该包括

带薪病假和健康福利等

这些职位是如此强大,

因为它们确保了稳定

的长期

收入流入家庭,并提供了

长期的

财务稳定性。 - 支付或

合同工作

si mply 无法提供

这些职位

实际上可以保护家庭免受粮食

不安全的影响,

但由于结构性种族主义,

这些职位目前不太

可能由黑人

担任,以便组织应对这一

挑战,这将要求

他们中的许多人

经历 他们的运作方式发生了重大变化

,我可以举几个

例子说明这可能是什么样的

组织首先可以开始收集

和使用基于种族的数据来

了解其员工和董事会

目前可能存在的多样性差距

组织可以 还可以做一些事情,例如

增加工资,

特别是为他们的最低工资职位增加工资,

并确定工资比率以限制组织中

最低工资

和最高工资工作人员之间的差异

许多

机构

在招聘过程中存在歧视

事实上,许多合格的申请人

根本无法获得这些

证书

组织也可以

与草根社区组织

合作

,与面临

不成比例的障碍的社区合作,

以确保获得更广泛的求职者需求

与所有这些组织一起,候选人的多样性

必须

继续收集

基于种族的数据,以

评估这些干预措施的影响所有

这些

建议旨在减少

黑人

土著和其他种族化人群在

招聘

过程中的障碍。 司法工作 我

开始明白,粮食不安全的解决方案

与粮食的关系

不大,而与消除结构性种族主义

等压迫制度的关系更大

与一个通用的

联合网络一起 f 强大的社会

计划,因为人们口袋里有足够的钱,

并且社会安全网

实际上对每个人

都有效,无论您来自哪个社区,我们都将能够结束粮食

不安全

和贫困

这有责任实现

这一点,

但我们作为个人有

权力

和责任让我们的

民选官员对这些承诺负责

与您谈论食物

银行

或膳食计划 您可以提醒他们

这些不是从长远来看

可以根除这个问题

的解决方案 最终解决方案非常

简单 人们需要能够

获得他们所需的食物资金

我们 must get our elected representatives

to understand that the solutions to food

insecurity

must be income based

we must 还要解决这样一个事实,即

像黑人社区这样的少数群体目前

由于结构性种族主义而面临更大的障碍,

我们必须让更多的

黑人土著和其他种族化的

在组织内担任稳定的高薪决策

权职位,我们都

必须记住,我们不能 谈论

粮食不安全

而不谈论贫困和

结构性

种族主义,如果我们

能够做到这一切,那么也许

我们将能够想象一个

未来

,加拿大的每个人都可以有尊严地养活

自己的家人和社区

, 粮食不安全是遥远的

记忆

谢谢