Reclaiming the art of living well and why our future depends on it

[Music]

have you

ever loved somebody so much you felt

you’d do

anything to keep them from harm

16 years ago i became a mother and the

very first time i held my baby boy in my

arms

i felt such a surge of love i promised

then i would do anything i could to

protect him

unfortunately soon after he was born i

discovered a threat to his future that

would make it almost

impossible for me to keep that promise

in 2005 global co2 levels were already

at 382

parts per million that’s about 100 parts

per million

above pre-industrial levels scientists

were warning that we needed to keep our

levels below

400 in order to prevent tipping into

what they called

the danger zone exceeding this number

would lead to a level of global heating

that would threaten

all life on earth

and there i was with my small child

suddenly facing a radically different

future from the one i’d imagined for him

there was so much going through my mind

but one question stood out

how was it possible that scientists knew

this

that industry knew this that politicians

knew this

and yet here we were carrying on with

business as usual

we seem to be in the grip of some big

powerful story

and i kept wondering what it was that

could have such a hold on us

that we would risk our own extinction

i soon discovered that it was a story of

economics

at least the story of economics as we

tell it now

you see if we could travel back to

ancient greece and hang out with

aristotle

as he wandered the dusty streets of

athens in the 3rd century bc

he would quickly remind us that the word

economics comes from the greek words

ecos meaning home or household and nomos

meaning management

so at its core economics is a system by

which humans manage their resources for

the benefit of all

it is the art of living well

aristotle distinguished this from

chromatistics which comes from the greek

word crema

meaning money chromatistics focuses on

the accumulation of

private wealth it is the art of making

money

so we seem to be conflating economics

the art of living

well with chromatistics the art of

making money

and in doing so justifying the buying

and selling

of anything we can get our hands on

regardless of the consequences

to me that seemed like an insane way to

do economics

so i started to look for some hope and

sanity

i found it when i discovered the work of

chilean economist

manfred mack sniff max neef was a

professor of economics who began his

career teaching at berkeley in the 1960s

and in the 70s he traveled to latin

america to work with some of the poorest

people on the planet

he used to tell a story of how he was

one day

high up in the sierra mountains of peru

in an indian village

it had rained all day long and the

ground had turned to mud

manfred walked out and he met a young

man

he knew that this young man had a wife

and four children and a mother to look

after at home

and no job the man looked thin

and hungry and he was standing with his

bare feet

in the mud manfred looked at the man

and the man looked back at him here he

was this

great economist from berkeley what

should he tell him

should he tell him to be glad that gdp

was rising by five percent

or that exports were blooming

it all seemed absurd and he said of that

moment

i looked into the eyes of poverty and

had

nothing to say

he realized then that he needed a new

language of economics

a language of economics that could make

sense of the terrible poverty he was

witnessing

both the incredible hardship as well as

the enormous creativity involved in

overcoming it

so together with his colleagues he

created a framework called

human scale development or barefoot

economics

because it requires us to step into the

mud and practice economics

as if people and planet matter

so what is barefoot economics in a

nutshell it is a framework that judges

the success of an economy

not by how much money is exchanged for

goods or services what we call gdp

but on how well we are able to satisfy

our fundamental needs

without harming ourselves others and the

earth

it proposes nine needs which are

constant across time and place and the

same for all of us

so whether you are in india china or

ecuador

your fundamental needs are the same what

differs are the

opportunities you have to satisfy those

needs which are called satisfiers

so you could say that a culture is a set

of satisfiers

for our fundamental needs at a certain

place and a certain time

so the nine needs are subsistence

to keep our bodies healthy and alive

protection to feel safe and secure

affection to feel loved and appreciated

participation to have a voice and be

able to join in with others

identity to know who we are and where we

belong

understanding to be able to make sense

of the world

we have a need for freedom to have a

sense of autonomy and agency

creation to be able to express ourselves

and innovate

and idleness to have time to rest and

relax

so nine needs and endless satisfiers

let me explain how this works we tend to

think of food as a need

but what if we looked at it through the

lens of barefoot economics and saw it as

a satisfier for our needs

the most obvious one being subsistence

but the way we produce and consume

food can meet many other needs as well

let’s say you had a piece of land and

skills and you were able to grow your

own food

that would mean your needs for

understanding and subsistence

if you made a meal and sat down to eat

with family and friends

you’ll be meeting your need for creation

affection

identity and participation all at the

same time

if on the other hand the only food

available to you

is highly processed and shipped from a

part of the world that has very

few environmental and labor regulations

that food

is likely to harm your health the health

of the people who produce it

and the health of the planet when i

discovered this work

it was as if a door opened in my mind

here was a framework that described

economics as a web of relationships

and i could see how it might help us get

back to the art of living well

so i began teaching this language of

barefoot economics

and for over a decade now i’ve worked

with people from all across the world

from over 30 different countries many

different walks of life in different

ages

some as young as 12. together we explore

the many different ways people attempt

to meet these fundamental needs

which satisfies work which don’t and why

and this is what i’ve learned when

people look at their lives through the

lens of fundamental needs

they quickly realize the limitations of

our current economic system

many of them describe having to work

long hours to meet their needs for

subsistence

only having to sacrifice the needs for

affection

idleness and participation or

when they do decide to stay at home and

do the important work of caring for

children and the elderly

that work is invisible so we begin to

question what it means to be successful

if you have lots of money in the bank

but no opportunities to express yourself

creatively

build healthy relationships or get to

know yourself deep down

can you really call yourself rich

perhaps you’re poor in ways that our

current economic language simply cannot

describe we also start to question what

it means to live sustainably

we look at electric cars for example

which are often presented as a win-win

solution

by promising to lower emissions and at

the same time

grow a booming industry but when we

examine them through the lens of human

needs

we see that as well as requiring raw

materials from parts of the world that

often have lower

environmental and labor standards all

cars require roads roads go through

neighborhoods

and they destroy opportunities for

people to connect with each other

and for children to play freely and

safely in the street

and no matter what your car runs on it

won’t lessen the time you spend in

traffic jams on your daily commute to

work

so this process of separating needs from

satisfiers

allowed us to drop some of those single

measures that we use such as gdp and

parts per million

instead of simply trying to green our

existing lifestyles

we asked how can we meet the needs that

all humans have without harming

ourselves

others and the earth we open our

imaginations

and together we build a completely

different picture of the economy

one where our care compassion and

creativity are allowed to flourish

in service of meeting each other’s

fundamental human needs

and we discover that we are the engine

of the economy

we are the real wealth creators and that

we are part of a growing movement of

people

whose efforts are dedicated to growing

good lives for all

rather than making a profit for some

unfortunately all those efforts are

dwarfed by the powerful forces

of the growth economy our economic

system requires growth

regardless of whether what it produces

actually meets our needs

often only creating the illusion of

satisfaction

maxinee call these pseudo-satisfiers

they always leave us craving more

i was once working with a group of

teenagers when i asked whether anyone

could give me an example of a

pseudo-satisfier in their own lives

immediately this one young man’s hand

shot up

it’s my xbox he said i’m only on it

because my friends are on it

i’d much rather be doing something else

in person but i don’t feel i have a

choice

or as another young woman said i never

think about shopping when i’m just

having fun with my friends

pseudo-satisfiers are really the basis

of a growth economy

in such a system our most important role

becomes that of consumer

and the satisfies available to us become

limited to the ones that we have to pay

for

that is why each year companies spend

billions of dollars on advertising which

is becoming

increasingly sophisticated in 2019

pre-covered

that figure was nearly 587

billion dollars

that’s an worldwide force to resist and

it’s no wonder that most of us don’t

manage it

for many of us buying stuff pseudo

satisfies our needs for

affection and identity it gives us a

sense of care and belonging

in a world that at times seems devoid of

meaning

we are in a strange bind if the things

we produced were made to last

easy to repair not subject to fads and

really met our needs we could grow

our well-being our real wealth and at

the same time

protect the well-being of others and the

earth

but then the growth economy we believe

we are dependent on

would tank that is why you’ll see

that as soon as lockdown ends the first

thing governments will tell us to do

will be to get back on the treadmill

never mind that under lockdown we

realized that we need

loving touch and good health much more

than we need the latest gadgets

that we get more pleasure from our

hedges than our hedge fund managers

and that the people who bring real value

to our lives

are not the bankers they’re our food

growers

our delivery drivers our medics our

health care workers

our teachers our musicians our artists

our neighbors families and friends all

those

people whose efforts meet our real needs

nevertheless we will be told to put that

aside and return to the usual cycle

of overworking and undercaring to grow

gdp

barefoot economics is an attempt to help

us break out of this potentially

fatal economic story it shows us that

good economics

isn’t at odds with our innate generosity

and kindness

that we don’t have to choose between

decent meaningful work

and a healthy planet that we are all

interdependent

and we all deserve lives live with

dignity and respect

a good economy is not a prison

a good economy is a thriving web of

relationships

capable of nurturing and protecting what

we hold dear

it’s 2021 that little baby boy i held so

lovely in my arms

is now nearly 16 taller than his mom

and ready to step out into the world

unfortunately global co2 levels are now

at 417 parts per million

we pass the 400 part per million mark in

2015

six years ago we are now officially in

the danger zone

still i cling to the hope that if we

reclaim economics as the art of living

well

and focus our efforts on growing our

real wealth

i may just be able to keep my promise

i certainly don’t want to have to look

my son in the eyes

and tell him that we couldn’t protect

his future

that we couldn’t protect the future of

all our children

because nobody could find a way to make

a profit from it thank you

[音乐]

你有

没有如此爱过一个人,以至于你觉得

你会做

任何事来保护他们免受伤害

16 年前我成为了一名母亲,当

我第一次把我的男婴抱在

怀里时,

我感受到了如此强烈的爱

那时我答应过我会尽我所能

保护他

不幸的是,在他出生后不久,我

发现了对他未来的威胁,

这将使我几乎

无法兑现这个

承诺 2005 年全球二氧化碳水平已经

达到百万分之 382 大约

比工业化前水平高出百万分之 100

科学家警告说,我们需要将

水平保持在

400 以下,以防止进入

他们所谓

的危险区

地球

,我和我的小孩

突然

面临一个与我为他想象的完全不同的未来,

我的脑海里浮现了很多东西,

但一个问题很突出,这

怎么可能 科学家们知道

一点,工业界知道这一点,政客们

知道这一点

,但在这里,我们

照常进行业务,

我们似乎陷入了一些

强大的故事之中

,我一直想知道是什么东西

可以如此控制我们

我们会冒着灭亡的风险

我很快就发现这是一个

经济学

的故事 至少是我们现在讲述的经济学的故事

你看看我们是否可以回到

古希腊和

亚里士多德

一起闲逛

在公元前 3 世纪的雅典,

他会迅速提醒我们,

经济学这个词来自希腊词

ecos,意思是家庭或家庭,而 nomos

意思是管理,

因此其核心经济学是一个系统

,人类通过该系统管理自己的资源

以造福于

一切。 亚里士多德的生活艺术

其与来自希腊词crema的色彩学区分开来,

意思是金钱色彩学专注于

私人财富的积累 赚钱的艺术,

所以我们似乎把经济学

好生活的艺术和色彩

学混为一谈

做经济学的一种疯狂方式,

所以我开始寻找一些希望和

理智。

当我发现智利经济学家曼弗雷德麦克斯尼夫的工作时,我找到了它,

马克斯尼夫是一位

经济学教授,他

于 1960 年代开始在伯克利大学教授他的职业生涯

。 70 年代,他前往

拉丁美洲与地球上一些最贫穷的人一起工作,

他曾经讲过一个故事,讲述他有

一天在秘鲁山脉

的一个印度村庄的高处

,那里整天都在下雨,而

地面 已经变成泥巴的

曼弗雷德走了出来,他遇到了一个

年轻人,

他知道这个年轻人有一个妻子

和四个孩子,还有一个母亲要

在家照顾

,没有工作。这个男人看起来

又瘦又饿,他很高兴 赤脚

站在泥泞中,曼弗雷德看着那个男人

,男人也回头看着他,他

是伯克利的这位

伟大的经济学家,

应该告诉他什么应该告诉他,他应该为国内生产

总值上升 5%

或 出口正在蓬勃发展

这一切似乎都很荒谬,他谈到那

一刻

我看着贫困的眼睛,

无话可说,

他意识到他需要一种新

的经济学语言,一种能够

理解他可怕的贫困的经济学语言

目睹

了令人难以置信的困难以及克服困难所

涉及的巨大创造力

因此他与他的同事一起

创建了一个称为

人类规模发展或赤脚

经济学的框架,

因为它要求我们踏入

泥潭并实践经济学

,就好像人和地球很重要

一样 简而言之,赤脚经济学

是一个框架,它

不是根据商品或服务交换了多少金钱来判断经济是否成功的

框架 冰上我们所说的gdp,

但在不伤害自己他人和地球的情况下,我们能够在多大程度上满足

我们的基本需求

它提出了九个需求,这些需求

在时间和地点上都是不变的,

对我们所有人来说都是一样的,

所以无论你是在印度中国还是

厄瓜多尔

你的基本需求是一样的

不同的是

你有机会

满足那些被称为满足者的需求

所以你可以说一种文化是

在特定地点和特定时间满足我们基本需求的一组满足者

所以九种需求 是

维持我们的身体健康和活着的

保障 感到安全和有保障的

感情 感到被爱和被欣赏

参与 有发言权并

能够与他人一起

身份 知道我们是谁,我们属于哪里

理解 能够做出

世界感

我们需要自由

有自主感和能动性

创造 能够表达自己

创新 懒惰才能拥有 是时候休息和

放松了,

所以九种需求和无穷无尽的满足

让我解释一下这是如何运作

的 显而易见的一个是维持生计,

但是我们生产和消费

食物的方式也可以满足许多其他需求,

假设您拥有一块土地和

技能,并且您能够种植

自己的食物

,这意味着您需要

理解和

生存 一顿饭,坐下来

与家人和朋友一起吃饭,

你将同时满足你对创造

情感

认同和参与的需求,

如果另一方面

,你可以得到的唯一食物

是经过高度加工的,并且是从

部分地区运来的

环境和劳工法规很少的世界

食品可能会损害您的健康

生产食品的

人们的健康和地球的健康 当我

发现这项工作

时,就好像 在我的脑海中打开了

一个框架,将

经济学描述为一个关系网

,我可以看到它如何帮助我们

回到美好生活的艺术,

所以我开始教授赤脚经济学这门语言

,十多年来我 曾

与来自世界

各地来自 30 多个不同国家/

地区的人们一起工作,不同年龄层的许多不同阶层的人,

其中一些年仅 12 岁。我们一起探索

人们

尝试满足这些基本需求的多种不同方式,这些基本需求

满足了工作,但 为什么

,这就是我所学到的,当

人们从基本需求的角度看待他们的生活时

他们很快意识到

我们当前经济体系的局限性

,他们中的许多人描述必须

长时间工作才能满足他们的生存需求,

只需要 牺牲

感情的

闲散和参与的需要,或者

当他们决定留在家里

做照顾

孩子和老人

的重要工作时 兽人是隐形的,所以我们开始

质疑

如果你在银行里有很多钱,

但没有机会创造性地表达自己,

建立健康的关系或

深入了解自己,那么成功意味着什么

我们

当前的经济语言根本无法

描述的糟糕方式 我们也开始质疑

可持续生活意味着什么

我们以电动汽车为例

,它们通常被视为一种双赢的

解决方案

,承诺降低排放并

同时实现

增长 一个蓬勃发展的行业,但当我们

从人类需求的角度审视它们时,

我们发现除了需要

来自世界各地

环境和劳工标准通常较低的原材料外,所有

汽车都需要道路,道路穿过

社区

,它们破坏了

人们的机会 相互联系

,让孩子们

在街上自由安全地玩耍

,不管你的车在上面跑什么

不会减少您在

日常通勤路上花费在交通拥堵上的时间,

因此这种将需求与满足者分开的过程

使我们能够放弃一些

我们使用的单一指标,例如 gdp 和

百万分之几,

而不是简单地尝试绿色 我们

现有的生活方式

我们询问如何

在不伤害

自己、

他人和地球

的情况下

满足所有人

的需求 满足彼此的

基本人类需求

,我们发现我们是经济的引擎

我们是真正的财富创造者,

我们是不断增长的人们运动的一部分,

他们的努力致力于

为所有人创造美好的生活,

而不是为了盈利 不幸的是,对于一些人来说,

所有这些努力都

与增长经济的强大力量相形见绌,

我们的经济

体系需要

增长 不管它产生的东西是否

真正满足我们的需求,

通常只会制造满足感的假象,

马克西尼称这些伪满足

者总是让我们渴望更多

在他们自己的生活中立即伪满足

这个年轻人的手

突然举起来

这是我的 Xbox 他说我只是在使用它

因为我的朋友在使用它

我宁愿亲自做其他

事情但我不觉得我 有一个

选择,

或者正如另一位年轻女性所说,

当我只是

和朋友一起玩的时候,我

从不考虑购物

可供我们使用

的仅限于我们必须支付的费用

这就是为什么公司每年

在广告上花费数十亿美元的原因,这

在 2019 年变得越来越复杂

这个数字接近 5870

亿美元

,这是一股全球性的抵制力量,

难怪我们大多数人都无法

管理它,

因为我们中的许多人购买伪商品

满足我们对

情感和身份的需求,它给了我们一种

关怀和

归属感 一个有时似乎毫无意义的世界

如果

我们生产的产品

经久耐用,易于修复,不受时尚影响并

真正满足我们的需求,我们就可以增加

我们的福祉,成为我们真正的财富,

同时 时间

保护他人和地球的福祉,

但我们认为我们所依赖的增长型经济

将会衰退,这就是为什么你会看到

,一旦封锁结束,

政府会告诉我们做的第一件事

就是获得 回到跑步机上,

别介意在封锁期间,我们

意识到我们需要

爱抚和身体健康,而

不是需要最新的小玩意

,我们从对冲中获得的乐趣

比对冲基金经理

还要多 o

为我们的生活带来真正价值

的不是银行家 他们是我们的粮食

种植者

我们的送货司机 我们的医生 我们的医护人员

我们的老师 我们的音乐家 我们的艺术家

我们的邻居家人和朋友 所有

那些努力满足我们真正需要的人

尽管如此,我们仍将成为 被告知

抛开这一点,回到通常

的过度工作和缺乏关怀的循环来增加

GDP

善良

,我们不必在

体面有意义的工作

和健康的地球之间做出选择 我们都

相互依存

,我们都应该过有

尊严和尊重

的生活 良好的经济不是

监狱 良好的经济是繁荣的关系网络,

能够 培育和保护

我们所

珍视的东西 到了 2021 年,我怀里如此可爱的那个小男孩

现在比他妈妈高了近 16 岁,

并且准备好了 步入世界

不幸的是,全球二氧化碳水平现在

是百万分之 417

我们在六年前的 2015 年超过百万分之四百大关

我们现在正式

处于危险区

我仍然抱有希望,如果我们

恢复经济作为 好好生活的艺术

,把我们的努力集中在增加我们

真正的财富上

我也许只能信守诺言

我当然不想看着

我儿子的

眼睛告诉他我们无法保护

他的

未来 我们无法保护我们所有孩子的未来,

因为没有人能找到

从中获利的方法谢谢