How business success aligns with diversity equity and inclusion

[Music]

you know it’s it’s

fascinating to think that our our

workplace and our approach to dei

largely hasn’t changed following

about immediately post world war ii but

then you look at who our workforce is

now it’s 47

female and 49 of

millennial workers who make up the

biggest share of the workforce

are people of color and so if you’re not

hearing from those people

you are leaving an immense amount of

good ideas on the table

and you’re just leaving money on the

table and so

you know in just an increasingly

competitive environment

that’s how you get your competitive

advantage i mean they’re already there

you’ve already done the work to bring

them to the workplace

and so you know it can be that you’re

looking at that from

a product design lens that you just want

to create products

that appeal to a wider audience

it can be that you’re looking at this

from a risk mitigation perspective

you know we’re seeing that organizations

that have more diverse leadership

bounce back more quickly following

recessions and you know yeah we see from

an innovation lens it’s really cool to

see

tech companies that employ more

inclusive strategies

end up producing more patents so they

just

end up creating more and it has a bigger

impact on who their consumer base is you

know and how they’re perceived how other

people perceive their brand

yeah this just sounds like a win all

around to make forward progress

to recognize for companies that are at

the starting line that that’s in fact

where they are

and that there’s a lot of distance that

can be traveled

from there in your ted talk you

described

the uh you know the destination point of

true gender equity being reached in a

distant future

are there companies that are moving that

um

that finish line or that new state line

closer faster than others and are there

any examples of those that are actually

close you know in near term now given

the value and benefits

of gender equity

patagonia we really look at patagonia as

a great leader in this space

um they’ve always been a player that

just says okay show us the research

on what is going to be the best for our

underrepresented employees and we’ll do

that thing

and so you know they were kind of one of

the first to do that with pain leave

they’ve had great flex work policies and

it shows so they report just

having close to zero attrition of their

employees

they’re just not losing anyone because

people are happy and they want to stay

um salesforce mark benioff has

done i want to say he’s not just done a

lot of work he’s been very vocal about

the work they’re doing

in a way that goes beyond pr um so we

really look to them as a leader as well

where you know he’s he’s talked about

this publicly

that he realized one day they’ve never

done a true pay gap audit in their

company

they did one they found gaps and then he

just said we’ll close that

like pay the people more do it he went

completely public about this and told

everyone we have pay gaps

instead of doing this like hush keep it

behind the scenes

so he set a great example for other

businesses

and then you know the next step he took

that we really find to be the most

important

is that then he said let’s look at the

systemic factors that caused this pay

gap in the first place

which you know is what we really look to

leaders to do that people do these pay

gap analyses and they treat them like

pay gaps happen in a vacuum

and so then they will pay the employees

who were making less the speaking of

broad strokes

you know they’ll pay them to close that

gap and it’s a short-term

fix and so we say yeah that’s great go

and close this gap because those people

deserve to be paid more

but in three years you’re gonna have a

pay gap again you know that problem is

gonna come right back and it’s gonna

resurface

so you know it’s just a symptom of

something else that’s really underlying

and then you know locally in seattle um

evia events

is one of our our recently certified

organizations

um you’re familiar with them i think

they actually did some production work

with ted

um they are doing great work in this

space especially just because they

center it

on such a consistent basis that you know

yes they put these policies in place

like they do blind resume reviews now

they standardize their performance

evaluation practices

um they’ve really structured their

mentorship so that everyone is equal

access to senior leaders

and then you know from what i see in

their blogs and what i hear from their

employees

it’s like they talk about equity and

inclusion every week you know

it’s not just something where like they

give water bottles to women on

international women’s day and make a

statement that they care

they really do put in the work and it’s

shown

in their products that they offer that

you know they’re more inclusive in terms

of

multiple languages being offered in

their captions

for you know the digital products that

they provide

and really they design everything they

do with an equity lens so that’s super

cool to see

um and then yeah i just i look at you

know

it’s hard not to just focus on

organizations that we certify but nia

impact capital

is another great one they were our first

one and they

are an impact investment firm and so the

interesting thing about them is that

they started

i mean they were founded with a gender

lens their founder

said let’s have a you know gender

forward investment portfolio so it’s the

thing that they cared about

and they still found that they had a lot

of work to do

you know when we assessed them you know

it was this great moment for them where

i mean they literally were created to

further

the purpose of gender equity and they

still

found when it came to evaluating their

own practices and processes that they

had changes to make

and you know similar to mark benioff

they were very public about them

they said these are what our gaps were

and this is what we did to change them

and you know i don’t think they’ve lost

an employee since

you know i think employees are there and

engaged and just have this sense of

pride

in what they do and

you know it almost sounds like a drive

towards business

success is a great dni de ni

driver right i mean everything you’re

mentioning are specific

uh research-based practical

they each and collectively show positive

business results

um and employee satisfaction improvement

results

um so it sounds like it’s

you know all just across the board

beneficial for companies and

um producing powerful results at at all

levels

um taking it back to the uh

you know the the fact that there is this

mix of unconscious bias plus uh

organizational inertia and historical

system systemic dynamics in place

there there may be some programs that um

that make claims to do a

significant significant um change in de

ni

but only kind of really scratched the

surface

how can a company distinguish between

a something that sort of is a a band-aid

on something that needs some more

significant overhaul

that’s a great question so we

you know whether or not you’re you’re

going to end up working with jen

we say you know if you’re an employer an

employee a consumer who wants to spend

money in alignment with your values

ask what the criteria are behind

you know whether they’re a consultancy

or a non-profit organization or a best

workplaces

to work list ask what the criteria are

ask what they’re measuring

um what gets measured matters you know

and it ends up driving the focus in an

organization

so if an outside consultancy comes in

and says

you just need to focus on representation

that’s a problem

if that is their only set of criteria

because you know if you’re a giant

organization like amazon you can

afford to essentially rehire and rehire

and rehire so representation numbers

look

great but they may be bringing people

into the organization

that they’re not really ready to include

you know where they’ve

put up new window dressing but they

haven’t fixed the house and so

you know we put all of our criteria

online for a reason

you know we kind of joke that we test

let it like we put it out there and we

say even if you don’t work with us feel

free to use these

design your organizations and be equity

centered but those are also meant to act

as a kind of checklist for people to

look at so that you know

if you’re interviewing for a job you

know

you can ask how have you standardized

your performance evaluation practices

how do you ensure

you know women and minorities get equal

access to professional development

opportunities here

and there are ways that they should and

shouldn’t be doing those things

um you know one of the

the things that we look at with a really

critical eye are

other lists because that’s why it’s why

we created what we’re doing

um and so frankly you know i sit

in conversation after conversation with

potential certification candidates

that say you know wow you have

actionable

insightful recommendations but we’d have

to do the work

and frankly we look at these guys over

here and we can write them a check for

ten thousand dollars

make a public statement that we’re

committed to equity and we’re good and

so

you know we’re sorry but we’re going

with that approach

and i understand why um

but it does make it so that those of us

who are you know working with

organizations to make authentic change

are up against even bigger barriers

you know and it makes it that much more

confusing for women and people of color

to assess

where they’re really going to be

appreciated you know and who’s going to

honor their ambitions so we just we ask

everyone look for criteria and if you

can’t find any that’s a red flag

you know if you can’t find any that

probably means that a consultancy went

in

and said yes you’re great you’re doing

everything right

you know you can check the box and tell

your employees they have nothing to

complain about

um and go on your way so if they don’t

have criteria that’s a problem

so it is critical that organizations

recognize

the necessity of actually doing some of

the work i’m struck by

how the way that work gets recognized

and even how it gets implemented can

look really differently

it can seem like an incredible amount of

work but when

at the end of the day it might come down

to things like

having an extra minute during a meeting

to give people a chance to respond

that’s the kind of work like it’s just

good for your relationship

work right it you know it may seem hard

at first

but once you do it you see the benefits

right away

you know improved interactivity improved

closeness improved

uh cross-pollination of ideas improved

engagement and improved energy is that

also true um more broadly do you think

that

organizations see the benefits in in

that kind of a light um does that help

become a motivator if it is

that helps them get over some of the

hurdles of the work

absolutely i mean i think

yeah there’s an inertia right there’s an

inertia to overcome

and i think what we see is once they

take the first step

they find out it’s not that bad like

it’s really

not the nightmare situation that a lot

of people envision

in fact it’s usually just really

positive and exciting

and employees are happy that it’s

finally happening and they’ve finally

been heard

you know it doesn’t turn into this place

where it’s like all the men are going to

lose their jobs

like that really is not the outcome it’s

that the people who are

there are finally being seen um

and so yeah i mean i think whether or

not it’s a motivator it’s something that

organizations

eventually experience and it’s probably

the most common piece of feedback we get

is just this isn’t what we thought it

was going to be

you know really grateful that we did it

um but it is that first step that’s

that’s the hardest it’s like lacing up

the running juice is the hardest part

right to be cliche

um and for a lot of them you know to be

completely honest they come to us

because they’ve had a discrimination

complaint or they’ve had something

bad happen that finally is kind of their

wake-up call

where they realize that you know they

really do

need to do something different and then

they find out that this really um is

about changing systems

you know they find out that it’s about

changing some processes

and a lot of them they’re just plug and

play it’s like

you change them once and you’re set to

go

so it’s really more efficient than doing

like

trainings every year and just trying to

be better people you know it’s just that

onus from the employee to the

organization in a way where we hope they

people don’t actually have to constantly

think

about whether or not they’re

incidentally being biased

because these processes should protect

against it even if they’re being biased

so in a way if we are

not consciously including we’re probably

unconsciously excluding

um we’re coming to the end of our

time together now i’m wondering if you

have any

closing thoughts or uh call to action or

final takeaway that you’d like to leave

us with perhaps a broad

statement that could apply to lots of

different people whether they’re

business leaders or employees

i like that um i mean the thing that you

just said is great you know

i think some of the feedback we hear a

lot of times that’s a little bit

sad people think you know okay well if

we have to bring in

you know a lot more underrepresented

people does that mean that we have to

lower our standards

which is an unfortunate way of thinking

about it and you know one of the things

i bring up like it’s not

that you’re necessarily you’re not

having to bring in anyone who’s not

qualified it’s that you’re finally

bringing in

everyone who’s qualified you know that

you’ve been

leaving people out unintentionally

by not including them via your processes

um you know i think just in the times

that we’re in

and i think this will will probably stay

true

um a lot of organizations and

in the wake of me too and now you know

as black lives matter really gains a lot

of momentum

organizations are revisiting their

diversity numbers for the first time in

years

and they’re finding out that they

haven’t budged you know and they’re

saying how did this happen

how could this be and you know

kind of two recommendations i would just

make for them

is this time around you have this

renewed energy and that is fantastic

don’t stop at a recruiting strategy you

know if an organization comes to us for

recruiting

i will insist that they need a retention

equity and inclusion strategy

because it’s not fair to bring

underrepresented people into

organizations that aren’t ready

for them um and the other one if i think

if there was like a slogan

like a drop on organizations it would

just be that dei

is not your company kickball team so

please get experts to work with you if

you don’t have anyone in-house we see

a lot of companies treat diversity

equity inclusion

like this fund extracurricular like

kickball where they’re like hey we’ve

decided to start a dei task force

you know whoever is interested show off

wednesday with your best ideas

and you know would you do this with it

with accounting would you do this with

operations or any other business

critical function

um no so when we see companies do that

you know when they take the kickball

approach

this is what happens is a lot of

googling occurs

which leads to like your cached

algorithms bringing you to links that

make you feel comfortable

and then there’s a lot of infighting

about what people should do

and then everyone stares the one person

of color or woman in the room and says

well what do you think

um and that person’s in a really risky

position at that point

and they can bear you know a huge amount

of risk and being honest with people

so we really just asked organizations

please call an expert

ask what their criteria are to actually

help you

treat dei like any other critical

business function

and you’ll see huge success for both

social factors and financial

thank you sarah that is just wonderful

to see it

laid out and clearly expressed the way

you do uh

you know and here’s to a a near-term

future

and hopefully a broad-wide deep future

where everyone is deeply meaningfully

included in

every aspect of the work and we bring

everyone’s contributions

to bear against the business critical

functions that we all want to

deliver on sarah thank you so much um

really really appreciate you taking the

time chris thank you phil

i appreciate it

[音乐]

你知道

,想想我们的

工作场所和我们对待 dei 的方式在二战结束

后基本上没有改变,这很有趣,

但是你看看我们现在的劳动力是谁

,47 名

女性和 49 名

千禧一代工人

在劳动力中占最大份额的

是有色人种,所以如果你没有

听到这些人的声音

,你就会在桌面上留下大量的好主意,而你只是把钱留在

桌面上,所以

你知道 只是竞争日益

激烈的环境

,这就是您获得竞争

优势的方式我的意思是他们已经在那里

您已经完成了将

他们带到工作场所的工作

,因此您知道这可能是您

从产品设计中看到的 镜头,您只是想

创建吸引更广泛受众的产品

您可能是

从风险缓解的角度看待这个问题

您知道我们看到

组织具有更多样化的领导力

经济衰退后反弹更快,你知道,是的,我们

从创新的角度看到,

看到采用更具

包容性战略的科技公司

最终产生更多专利,因此他们

最终创造了更多专利,这

对他们的消费者产生了更大的影响,这真的很酷 基础是你

知道的,以及他们是如何被看待的,其他人是如何

看待他们的品牌

在您的 ted 演讲中,您

描述

了从那里可以走的很多距离,嗯,您知道

在遥远的未来达到真正的性别平等的目的地点

是否有公司正在更快地移动

那条终点线或新的州线

与其他人相比,

考虑到性别平等模式的价值和好处,你现在知道短期内是否有任何实际接近的

例子 onia,我们真的将巴塔哥尼亚视为

该领域的伟大领导者,

嗯,他们一直是一个

只会说好吧的参与者,向我们展示

什么对我们

代表性不足的员工来说是最好的研究,我们会做

那件事

等等 你知道他们是

第一个这样做的人之一,

他们有很好的弹性工作政策,

这表明他们报告说

他们的员工流失率接近于零

他们只是没有失去任何人,因为

人们很开心 他们想留下 销售

人员马克贝尼奥夫已经完成

了 领导

以及你知道他是谁他公开谈论过

件事他意识到有一天他们从来没有

在他们的公司进行过真正的薪酬差距审计

他们做了一个他们发现差距然后他

只是说我们会

像付钱一样关闭 更多的是他

完全去酒吧 lic 关于这件事并告诉

大家我们有工资差距

而不是像闭嘴那样做这件事把它

放在幕后

所以他为其他企业树立了一个很好的榜样

然后你知道他采取的下一步

我们真的认为最

重要

的是 然后他说,让我们首先看看

导致这种薪酬差距的系统性因素

,你知道这是我们真正希望

领导者做的事情,人们进行这些薪酬

差距分析,他们把他们当作

薪酬差距发生在真空中

,所以 然后他们会付钱给

那些少说

大招的员工,

你知道他们会付钱给他们以

缩小差距,这是一个短期的

解决办法,所以我们说是的,这很好

,缩小差距,因为这些人

应该得到 得到更多的报酬,

但三年后你会

再次出现工资差距 你知道问题

会马上卷土重来,而且会

重新出现,

所以你知道这只是

其他真正潜在问题的症状

,然后你就知道当地人了 y in seattle um

evia events

是我们最近获得认证的

组织之一,

嗯,你对他们很熟悉,我认为

他们实际上和 ted 做了一些制作工作

他们在这个领域做得很好,

特别是因为

他们把它

集中在如此一致的 基于你知道的,

是的,他们制定了这些政策,

就像他们对简历进行盲目审查一样,现在

他们标准化了他们的绩效

评估实践,

他们真的建立了他们的

导师制度,这样每个人都可以

平等地接触高级领导

,然后你从我看到的情况中知道

他们的博客和我从他们的

员工

那里听到的,就像他们每周都在谈论公平和

包容,你知道

这不仅仅是他们

在国际妇女节给女性送水瓶

声明他们关心

他们确实放入了 工作,并且

在他们提供的产品中显示,

您知道他们在提供多种语言方面更具包容性

您的继承人

字幕知道他们提供的数字产品,

并且实际上他们

使用股票镜头设计了他们所做的一切,所以看到

嗯,然后是的,我只是看着你

知道

很难不只关注

我们认证的组织 但是 nia

Impact Capital

是另一个很棒的公司,他们是我们的第

一个,他们

是一家影响力投资公司,所以

有趣的是

他们开始

我的意思是他们是从性别角度成立的,

他们的创始人

说让我们有一个你知道的性别

前瞻 投资组合,所以这

是他们关心的事情

,他们仍然发现他们还有

很多工作

要做 性别平等,他们

在评估

自己的实践和流程时仍然发现

他们需要做出改变

,你知道类似于马克贝尼奥夫,

他们非常公开 关于他们的 ic,

他们说这就是我们的差距

,这就是我们为改变他们

所做的事情,你知道我不认为他们失去了

一名员工,因为

你知道我认为员工在那里并

参与其中,只是有这种感觉

对他们所做的事情感到自豪,

你知道这听起来几乎像是

推动商业

成功的动力是一个伟大的 dni de ni

驱动器,对我的意思是你

提到的一切都是具体

的,基于研究的实用性,

它们每个都显示出积极的

业务成果

嗯和员工 满意度提高

结果

嗯,所以听起来

你知道所有的一切都

对公司有益,并且

在各个层面都产生了强大的结果,

嗯,

你知道这样一个事实,那就是

无意识的偏见加上呃

组织惯性和历史

系统系统动力学到位

可能有一些计划,嗯

,声称要

在德尼做重大的重大改变,

但只是种类 真正触及

表面

的公司如何区分

某种东西是一种

创可贴,需要一些更

重大的改革

这是一个很好的问题,所以我们

知道你是否

会结束 与 jen 合作,

我们说您知道您是否是雇主

雇员 想要

按照您的价值观花钱的消费者

询问您背后的标准是

什么 知道他们是咨询公司

、非营利组织还是最好的

工作场所

到工作清单 询问标准是

什么 询问他们在衡量

什么 嗯 什么是衡量的事情 你知道

,它最终会推动组织的焦点,

所以如果外部咨询公司进来

并说

你只需要专注于代表

,那就是

如果这是他们唯一的一组标准,那么问题就来了,

因为您知道如果您是像亚马逊这样的大型

组织,您

基本上可以负担得起重新雇用和重新雇用

和重新雇用,因此代表人数

看起来

不错,但是 你可能会将人们

带入

他们还没有真正准备好纳入的组织

你知道他们在哪里

放置了新的橱窗装饰但他们

还没有修好房子所以

你知道我们将所有标准放在

网上是有原因的

你知道我们开个玩笑,我们测试

让它就像我们把它放在那里一样,我们

说即使你不与我们

合作,也可以随意使用这些设计你的组织并以公平

为中心,但这些也意味着

充当 一种供人们

查看的清单,以便您知道

如果您正在面试一份您知道的工作,

您可以询问您如何标准化

您的绩效评估实践

如何确保

您知道女性和少数族裔在这里获得

平等的职业发展

机会

并且有一些他们应该和

不应该做这些事情的方式,

嗯,你

知道我们以非常批判的眼光看待的事情之一

其他列表,因为这就是为什么

我们创造了我们正在做的事情的原因

所以坦率地说,你知道我

在与潜在的认证候选人交谈后坐下来交谈,他们

说你知道哇你有

可行的

有见地的建议,但我们

必须做这项工作

,坦率地说,我们在这里看看这些人

,我们可以给他们写一张支票

一万

美元公开声明我们

致力于公平,我们很好,

所以

你知道我们很抱歉,但我们会

采用这种方法

,我理解为什么,

但它确实让我们这些人

你知道谁与

组织合作进行真正的改变

遇到

更大的障碍

尊重他们的野心,所以我们只是要求

每个人寻找标准,如果你

找不到任何危险信号,

你知道如果你找不到任何

可能意味着咨询公司进入

并同意你 “太好了,你做的

一切都是正确的

实际做一些工作的必要性令

我震惊的

是,工作是如何得到认可的

,甚至是如何实施的,

看起来真的很不一样

归结

为像

在会议期间多花一分钟

让人们有机会做出回应

这样的工作就像

它对你的关系有好处一样

工作你知道一开始可能看起来很难

但一旦你这样做了,你就会看到

马上

就知道的好处 提高互动性 提高

亲密度 提高思想的交叉授粉 提高

参与度和提高能量

也是如此 更广泛地说,你认为

组织认为是 受益于

那种光 嗯,如果

它能帮助他们克服工作中的一些

障碍,那是否有助于成为一种动力

看看,一旦他们

迈出第一步,

他们就会发现这并没有那么糟糕,就像

很多人想象的噩梦般的情况,

事实上,这通常是非常

积极和令人兴奋的

,员工很高兴它

终于发生了,他们终于

听说

你知道它不会变成这样一个

地方,就像所有男人都会像那样

失去工作

真的不是结果而是

那里的

人终于被看到了

,所以是的,我的意思是我认为 无论

它是否是一种激励因素,它是

组织

最终会经历的事情,这可能

是我们得到的最常见的反馈

,但这并不是我们认为的

那样,

你知道真的很重要 很高兴我们做到了,

嗯,但这

是最困难的第一步,就像系

上正在运行的果汁是最难的

部分,陈词滥调

,对于很多人来说,你知道

完全诚实,他们来找我们

是因为他们 有歧视

投诉,或者他们发生了一些

不好的事情,这最终是他们的

警钟

,他们意识到你知道他们

确实

需要做一些不同的事情,然后

他们发现这真的是

关于改变 系统

你知道他们发现这是关于

改变一些流程

,其中很多他们只是

即插即用,就像

你改变一次,你就准备好了,

所以它真的比每年都做

类似的

培训更有效率,只是 努力

成为更好的人,你知道这只是

员工对

组织的责任,我们希望

他们实际上不必经常

考虑

他们是否

偶然有偏见,

因为

即使它们有偏见,这些过程也应该防止它发生,

所以在某种程度上,如果我们

没有有意识地包括在内,我们可能会

无意识地

排除我们在一起的时间即将结束,

现在我想知道你是否

有任何

结束的想法或呃呼吁采取行动或

最后的外卖,你想给

我们留下一个广泛的

陈述,可能适用于许多

不同的人,无论他们是

商业领袖还是员工,

我喜欢这个,嗯,我的意思是你

刚刚 说的很好,你知道

我认为我们经常听到的一些反馈

有点

难过人们认为你很清楚如果

我们必须引入

你知道更多未被充分代表的

人这是否意味着我们必须

降低我们的 标准

,这是一种不幸的

思考方式,你知道

我提出的一件事,就像你

不一定要引进任何

不合格的人,而是你最终要

引进

每一个 一个有资格的人你知道

你一直在

无意中把人们排除在外,因为你

没有通过你的流程将他们包括

在内你知道我认为就在我们所处的时代

,我认为这可能会保持

真实,

很多组织和

在我之后,现在你

知道黑人的生命很重要,

很多动力

组织多年来第一次重新审视他们的

多样性数字

,他们发现他们

没有让你知道,他们是

说这是怎么发生的

,这怎么可能,你

知道我

会为他们提出两个建议,

这一次你有这种

新的能量,这太棒了

,不要停留在你知道的招聘策略上,

如果一个组织来 我们

招聘

我会坚持认为他们需要保留

公平和包容性策略,

因为将

代表性不足的人带入

尚未

为他们做好准备的组织是不公平的 nk

如果有像组织下降这样的口号

,那

只是 dei

不是您公司的踢球队,所以

如果您内部没有任何人,请让专家与您合作,

我们

看到很多公司都对待多样性

股权包容

像这个基金 课外活动

就像踢球 嘿,我们

决定成立一个 dei 工作组

你知道谁有兴趣在

星期三炫耀你最好的想法

,你知道你

会用会计来做这个吗? 这与

运营或任何其他

关键业务功能

有关 感觉舒服

,然后有很多

关于人们应该做什么的内讧

,然后每个人都盯着

房间里的一个有色人种或女人说

好,你觉得

嗯,那个p 人在那个时候处于一个非常危险的

位置

,他们可以承受你知道巨大

的风险并且对人诚实

所以我们真的只是要求组织

请致电专家

询问他们的标准是什么实际上可以

帮助你

像对待任何其他关键一样对待 dei

业务功能

,您将看到

社会因素和财务方面的巨大成功,

谢谢莎拉,很

高兴看到它的

布局并清楚地表达了您的工作方式

,嗯,

您知道,这是近期的

未来

,希望是广泛的- 广阔的未来

,每个人都深深地有意义地

参与

到工作的各个方面,我们让

每个人的贡献

来应对

我们都希望

在莎拉身上实现的关键业务功能,

非常感谢你,真的很感谢你抽出

时间,克里斯,谢谢你 菲尔

我很感激