Teach girls bravery not perfection Reshma Saujani

So a few years ago,

I did something really brave,

or some would say really stupid.

I ran for Congress.

For years, I had existed
safely behind the scenes in politics

as a fundraiser, as an organizer,

but in my heart, I always wanted to run.

The sitting congresswoman
had been in my district since 1992.

She had never lost a race,

and no one had really even run against her
in a Democratic primary.

But in my mind, this was my way

to make a difference,

to disrupt the status quo.

The polls, however,
told a very different story.

My pollsters told me
that I was crazy to run,

that there was no way that I could win.

But I ran anyway,

and in 2012, I became an upstart
in a New York City congressional race.

I swore I was going to win.

I had the endorsement
from the New York Daily News,

the Wall Street Journal
snapped pictures of me on election day,

and CNBC called it one of the hottest
races in the country.

I raised money from everyone I knew,

including Indian aunties

that were just so happy
an Indian girl was running.

But on election day, the polls were right,

and I only got 19 percent of the vote,

and the same papers
that said I was a rising political star

now said I wasted 1.3 million dollars

on 6,321 votes.

Don’t do the math.

It was humiliating.

Now, before you get the wrong idea,

this is not a talk
about the importance of failure.

Nor is it about leaning in.

I tell you the story
of how I ran for Congress

because I was 33 years old

and it was the first time
in my entire life

that I had done something
that was truly brave,

where I didn’t worry about being perfect.

And I’m not alone:

so many women I talk to tell me

that they gravitate
towards careers and professions

that they know
they’re going to be great in,

that they know they’re
going to be perfect in,

and it’s no wonder why.

Most girls are taught
to avoid risk and failure.

We’re taught to smile pretty,

play it safe, get all A’s.

Boys, on the other hand,

are taught to play rough, swing high,

crawl to the top of the monkey bars
and then just jump off headfirst.

And by the time they’re adults,

whether they’re negotiating a raise
or even asking someone out on a date,

they’re habituated
to take risk after risk.

They’re rewarded for it.

It’s often said in Silicon Valley,

no one even takes you seriously
unless you’ve had two failed start-ups.

In other words,

we’re raising our girls to be perfect,

and we’re raising our boys to be brave.

Some people worry
about our federal deficit,

but I, I worry about our bravery deficit.

Our economy, our society,
we’re just losing out

because we’re not raising
our girls to be brave.

The bravery deficit is why
women are underrepresented in STEM,

in C-suites, in boardrooms, in Congress,

and pretty much everywhere you look.

In the 1980s, psychologist Carol Dweck

looked at how bright fifth graders
handled an assignment

that was too difficult for them.

She found that bright girls
were quick to give up.

The higher the IQ,
the more likely they were to give up.

Bright boys, on the other hand,

found the difficult material
to be a challenge.

They found it energizing.

They were more likely
to redouble their efforts.

What’s going on?

Well, at the fifth grade level,

girls routinely outperform boys
in every subject,

including math and science,

so it’s not a question of ability.

The difference is in how boys
and girls approach a challenge.

And it doesn’t just end in fifth grade.

An HP report found
that men will apply for a job

if they meet only 60 percent
of the qualifications,

but women, women will apply

only if they meet 100 percent
of the qualifications.

100 percent.

This study is usually invoked
as evidence that, well,

women need a little more confidence.

But I think it’s evidence

that women have been socialized
to aspire to perfection,

and they’re overly cautious.

(Applause)

And even when we’re ambitious,

even when we’re leaning in,

that socialization of perfection

has caused us to take
less risks in our careers.

And so those 600,000 jobs
that are open right now

in computing and tech,

women are being left behind,

and it means our economy
is being left behind

on all the innovation and problems
women would solve

if they were socialized to be brave

instead of socialized to be perfect.

(Applause)

So in 2012, I started a company
to teach girls to code,

and what I found
is that by teaching them to code

I had socialized them to be brave.

Coding, it’s an endless process
of trial and error,

of trying to get the right command
in the right place,

with sometimes just a semicolon

making the difference
between success and failure.

Code breaks and then it falls apart,

and it often takes many, many tries

until that magical moment

when what you’re trying
to build comes to life.

It requires perseverance.

It requires imperfection.

We immediately see in our program

our girls' fear of not getting it right,

of not being perfect.

Every Girls Who Code teacher
tells me the same story.

During the first week,
when the girls are learning how to code,

a student will call her over
and she’ll say,

“I don’t know what code to write.”

The teacher will look at her screen,

and she’ll see a blank text editor.

If she didn’t know any better,
she’d think that her student

spent the past 20 minutes
just staring at the screen.

But if she presses undo a few times,

she’ll see that her student
wrote code and then deleted it.

She tried, she came close,

but she didn’t get it exactly right.

Instead of showing
the progress that she made,

she’d rather show nothing at all.

Perfection or bust.

It turns out that our girls
are really good at coding,

but it’s not enough
just to teach them to code.

My friend Lev Brie, who is a professor
at the University of Columbia

and teaches intro to Java

tells me about his office hours
with computer science students.

When the guys are struggling
with an assignment,

they’ll come in and they’ll say,

“Professor, there’s something
wrong with my code.”

The girls will come in and say,

“Professor, there’s something
wrong with me.”

We have to begin to undo
the socialization of perfection,

but we’ve got to combine it
with building a sisterhood

that lets girls know
that they are not alone.

Because trying harder
is not going to fix a broken system.

I can’t tell you how many women tell me,

“I’m afraid to raise my hand,

I’m afraid to ask a question,

because I don’t want to be the only one

who doesn’t understand,

the only one who is struggling.

When we teach girls to be brave

and we have a supportive network
cheering them on,

they will build incredible things,

and I see this every day.

Take, for instance,
two of our high school students

who built a game called Tampon Run –

yes, Tampon Run –

to fight against the menstruation taboo

and sexism in gaming.

Or the Syrian refugee

who dared show her love
for her new country

by building an app
to help Americans get to the polls.

Or a 16-year-old girl
who built an algorithm

to help detect whether a cancer
is benign or malignant

in the off chance
that she can save her daddy’s life

because he has cancer.

These are just
three examples of thousands,

thousands of girls who have been
socialized to be imperfect,

who have learned to keep trying,
who have learned perseverance.

And whether they become coders

or the next Hillary Clinton or Beyoncé,

they will not defer their dreams.

And those dreams have never been
more important for our country.

For the American economy,
for any economy to grow,

to truly innovate,

we cannot leave behind
half our population.

We have to socialize our girls
to be comfortable with imperfection,

and we’ve got to do it now.

We cannot wait for them
to learn how to be brave like I did

when I was 33 years old.

We have to teach them
to be brave in schools

and early in their careers,

when it has the most potential
to impact their lives

and the lives of others,

and we have to show them
that they will be loved and accepted

not for being perfect

but for being courageous.

And so I need each of you
to tell every young woman you know –

your sister, your niece,
your employee, your colleague –

to be comfortable with imperfection,

because when we teach
girls to be imperfect,

and we help them leverage it,

we will build a movement
of young women who are brave

and who will build
a better world for themselves

and for each and every one of us.

Thank you.

(Applause)

Thank you.

Chris Anderson: Reshma, thank you.

It’s such a powerful vision you have.
You have a vision.

Tell me how it’s going.

How many girls
are involved now in your program?

Reshma Saujani: Yeah.
So in 2012, we taught 20 girls.

This year we’ll teach 40,000
in all 50 states.

(Applause)

And that number is really powerful,

because last year we only graduated
7,500 women in computer science.

Like, the problem is so bad

that we can make
that type of change quickly.

CA: And you’re working with some
of the companies in this room even,

who are welcoming
graduates from your program?

RS: Yeah, we have about 80 partners,

from Twitter to Facebook

to Adobe to IBM to Microsoft
to Pixar to Disney,

I mean, every single company out there.

And if you’re not signed up,
I’m going to find you,

because we need every single tech company

to embed a Girls Who Code
classroom in their office.

CA: And you have some stories
back from some of those companies

that when you mix in more gender balance

in the engineering teams,
good things happen.

RS: Great things happen.

I mean, I think that it’s crazy to me
to think about the fact

that right now 85 percent of all
consumer purchases are made by women.

Women use social media at a rate
of 600 percent more than men.

We own the Internet,

and we should be building
the companies of tomorrow.

And I think when companies
have diverse teams,

and they have incredible women
that are part of their engineering teams,

they build awesome things,
and we see it every day.

CA: Reshma, you saw the reaction there.
You’re doing incredibly important work.

This whole community is cheering you on.
More power to you. Thank you.

RS: Thank you.

(Applause)

所以几年前,

我做了一些非常勇敢的事情,

或者有人会说非常愚蠢。

我竞选国会议员。

多年来,我作为筹款人、组织者一直
在政治的幕后安然无恙

但在我心中,我一直想参选。

这位现任国会女议员
自 1992 年以来一直在我所在的地区。

她从未输过一场比赛,

甚至没有人真正
在民主党初选中与她竞争过。

但在我看来,这是我改变

现状、打破现状的方式。

然而,民意调查却
讲述了一个截然不同的故事。

我的民意调查人员告诉我
,我跑起来很疯狂

,我不可能赢。

但我还是跑了

,2012 年,我
成为纽约市国会竞选的新贵。

我发誓我会赢。


得到了《纽约每日新闻》的支持

,《华尔街日报》
在选举日拍下了我的照片

,CNBC 称这是该国最热门的
比赛之一。

我从我认识的每个人那里筹集了资金,

包括印度阿姨

,他们非常
高兴印度女孩正在跑步。

但是在选举日,民意调查是正确的

,我只得到了 19% 的选票,


那些说我是政治新星的报纸

现在说我在 6,321 票上浪费了 130 万美元

不要做数学。

这太丢人了。

现在,在你产生错误的想法之前,

这不是在
谈论失败的重要性。

也不是靠

我。我告诉你我
如何竞选国会的故事,

因为我 33 岁

,这是

我一生中第一次
做真正勇敢的事情

,我不担心 关于完美。

而且我并不孤单

:我和很多女性交谈告诉我

,她们
倾向于从事

她们知道
自己会很出色

,她们知道自己
会很完美的职业和职业

,这也难怪 为什么。

大多数女孩都被教导
要避免风险和失败。

我们被教导要漂亮地微笑

,谨慎行事,获得所有 A。

另一方面,男孩

被教导要打粗鲁,高高挥杆,

爬到单杠的顶部
,然后头朝下跳。

到了他们成年的时候,

无论他们是在谈判加薪
还是约某人出去约会,

他们都
习惯于冒险一次又一次地冒险。

他们因此得到了回报。

硅谷常说,

除非你有两个失败的创业公司,否则没人会认真对待你。

换句话说,

我们正在培养我们的女孩变得完美

,我们正在培养我们的男孩变得勇敢。

有些人
担心我们的联邦赤字,

但我,我担心我们的勇敢赤字。

我们的经济,我们的社会,
我们只是在失败,

因为我们没有
让我们的女孩变得勇敢。

勇敢的缺陷是为什么
女性在 STEM

、C-Suite、董事会、国会

以及几乎所有你看到的地方的代表性不足的原因。

在 1980 年代,心理学家 Carol Dweck

研究了聪明的五年级学生如何
处理

对他们来说太难的作业。

她发现聪明的
女孩很快就放弃了。

智商越高
,他们就越有可能放弃。

另一方面,聪明的男孩

发现困难的
材料是一个挑战。

他们发现它充满活力。

他们更有
可能加倍努力。

这是怎么回事?

嗯,在五年级的时候,

女生通常
在每门学科上都比男生好,

包括数学和科学,

所以这不是能力的问题。

不同之处在于男孩
和女孩如何应对挑战。

它不仅仅在五年级结束。

惠普的一份报告发现
,男性

只要满足 60%
的资格

就会申请工作,而女性,女性

只有满足 100%
的资格才会申请。

100%的。

这项研究通常被
用作证明

女性需要更多自信的证据。

但我认为这

是女性被社会化
以追求完美的证据,

而且她们过于谨慎。

(掌声

)即使我们雄心勃勃,

即使我们正在努力,

这种完美的社会

化使
我们在职业生涯中承担的风险更少。

因此
,目前

在计算机和技术领域开放的 600,000 个工作岗位,

女性被抛在了后面

,这意味着我们的经济

在所有创新和问题上都被抛在了后面,

如果女性被社会化为勇敢

而不是被社会化 完美。

(掌声)

所以在 2012 年,我创办了一家公司
,教女孩们编程

,我
发现通过教她们编程,

我让她们变得勇敢。

编码,这是一个不断
试错的过程

,试图在正确的地方获得正确的命令

,有时只是一个分号

就可以
区分成功与失败。

代码中断,然后分崩离析,

并且通常需要多次尝试,

直到


尝试构建的东西变为现实的神奇时刻。

它需要毅力。

它需要不完美。

我们立即在我们的节目中看到

我们的女孩害怕做错了,

害怕不完美。

每个编程女孩的老师都
告诉我同样的故事。

在第一周,
当女孩们学习如何编码时,

一个学生会打电话给她
,她会说:

“我不知道该写什么代码。”

老师会看她的屏幕

,她会看到一个空白的文本编辑器。

如果她不知道更好,
她会认为她的学生

过去二十分钟
只是盯着屏幕。

但是,如果她按了几次撤消键,

她会看到她的学生
编写了代码,然后将其删除。

她尝试了,她接近了,

但她并没有完全正确。

与其展示
她取得的进步,

她宁愿什么都不展示。

完美或破产。

事实证明,我们的
女孩真的很擅长编码,


仅仅教她们编码是不够的。

我的朋友 Lev Brie 是
哥伦比亚大学的教授

,教授 Java 入门,

他告诉我他
与计算机科学专业学生的办公时间。

当这些人在
为一项任务而苦苦挣扎时,

他们会进来并说:

“教授
,我的代码有问题。”

女孩们会进来说:

“教授
,我有问题。”

我们必须开始消除
对完美的社会化,

但我们必须将其
与建立姐妹情谊相结合

,让女孩们
知道她们并不孤单。

因为更加
努力不会修复损坏的系统。

我无法告诉你有多少女人告诉我,

“我不敢举手,

我不敢问一个问题,

因为我不想成为唯一

一个不懂的人

,唯一一个 一个正在苦苦挣扎的人。

当我们教女孩勇敢

并且我们有一个支持网络
为她们欢呼时,

她们会创造出令人难以置信的东西

,我每天都看到这一点。

例如,
我们的两个

高中生制作了一个游戏 叫 Tampon Run -

是的,Tampon Run -

来对抗游戏中的月经禁忌

和性别歧视。

或者是叙利亚难民

敢于

通过开发一个应用程序
来帮助美国人参加投票来表达她对新国家的爱。

或者是 16 -
一个女孩,她建立了一个算法

来帮助检测癌症
是良性还是

恶性,
这样她就可以挽救她父亲的生命,

因为他患有癌症。

这只是

成千上万的被社会化的女孩中的三个例子
不完美,

谁学会了继续努力,
谁学会了坚持。

无论是程序员还是下一个希拉里·克林顿或碧昂丝,

他们都不会推迟自己的梦想。

这些梦想
对我们的国家来说从未如此重要。

为了美国经济,
为了任何经济增长,

为了真正的创新,

我们不能丢下
一半的人口。

我们必须让我们的
女孩接受不完美的社会化

,我们现在必须这样做。

我们迫不及待
地想让他们学习如何像

我 33 岁时那样勇敢。

我们必须教他们
在学校

和职业生涯的早期要勇敢,

因为这最有
可能影响他们的生活

和他人的生活

,我们必须向他们展示
他们会被爱和接受,

而不是因为完美,

而是 因为勇敢。

所以我需要你们每个
人告诉每一个你认识的年轻女性——

你的姐姐、你的侄女、
你的员工、你的同事——

对不完美感到自在,

因为当我们教
女孩不完美时

,我们帮助她们利用它 ,

我们将建立一个
勇敢的年轻女性运动

,她们将为自己和我们每个人建立
一个更美好的世界

谢谢你。

(掌声)

谢谢。

克里斯安德森:瑞诗玛,谢谢。

你有如此强大的愿景。
你有远见。

告诉我进展如何。 现在

有多少
女孩参与了你们的计划?

Reshma Saujani:是的。
所以在 2012 年,我们教了 20 个女孩。

今年我们将
在所有 50 个州教 40,000 名学生。

(掌声

)这个数字真的很强大,

因为去年我们只有
7,500 名女性毕业于计算机科学专业。

就像,问题是如此严重

,以至于我们可以
迅速做出这种改变。

CA:你
甚至和这个房间里的一些公司合作,

他们欢迎
你项目的毕业生?

RS:是的,我们有大约 80 个合作伙伴,

从 Twitter 到 Facebook

到 Adobe 到 IBM 到微软
到皮克斯到迪斯尼,

我的意思是,每一家公司。

如果你没有注册,
我会找到你,

因为我们需要每家科技公司

在他们的办公室里嵌入一个编程女孩教室。

CA:你
从一些公司

那里得到了一些故事,当你在工程团队中加入更多的性别平衡

时,
好事就会发生。

RS:伟大的事情发生了。

我的意思是,我

认为现在 85% 的
消费者购买都是由女性购买的事实对我来说很疯狂。

女性使用社交媒体的比例
比男性高出 600%。

我们拥有互联网

,我们应该建立
明天的公司。

而且我认为,当公司
拥有多元化的团队,

并且拥有令人难以置信的
女性作为其工程团队的一员时,

他们会创造出很棒的东西,
而且我们每天都能看到。

CA:Reshma,你看到了那里的反应。
你正在做非常重要的工作。

整个社区都在为你欢呼。
给你更多的力量。 谢谢你。

RS:谢谢。

(掌声)