The bottom billion Paul Collier

[Music]

[Music]

so can we dare to be optimistic

well the thesis of the bottom billion is

that a billion people have been stopped

living in economies that have been

stagnant for 40 years and hence

diverging from the rest of mankind and

so the real question to pose is not can

we be optimistic it’s how can we give

credible hope to that billion people

that to my mind is the fundamental

challenge now of development what I’m

going to offer you is a recipe a

combination of the two forces that

change the world for good which is the

Alliance of compassion and enlightened

self-interest compassion because a

billion people are living in societies

that have not offered credible hope that

is a human tragedy enlightened

self-interest because if that economic

divergence continues for another forty

years combined with social integration

globally it will build a nightmare for

our children we need compassion to get

ourselves started and enlightened

self-interest to get ourselves serious

that’s the Alliance that changes the

world so what does it mean to get

serious about providing hope for the

bottom billion what can we actually do

well a good guide is to think what did

we do last time the rich world got

serious about developing another region

of the world it just turns out quite a

good clue except you have to go back

quite a long time the last time the rich

world got serious about developing

another region was in the late 1940s

the rich world was you America and the

region that needed to be developed was

my world Europe that was post-war Europe

why did America get serious it wasn’t

just compassion for Europe though there

was that it was you knew you had to

because in the late nineteen forties

country after country in Central Europe

was falling into the Soviet bloc and so

you knew you’d no choice Europe had to

be dragged into economic development so

what did you do last time you got

serious well yes you had a big aid

program thank you very much that was

marshal aid we need to do it again

aid is part of the solution but what

else did you do

well you tore up your trade policy and

totally reversed it before the war

America had been highly protectionist

after the war you open your markets to

Europe you drag Europe into the vengal

economy which was your economy and you

institutionalize that trade

liberalisation through founding the

general agreement of tariffs and trade

so total reversal of trade policy did

you do anything else yes you totally

reversed your security policy before the

war your security policy had been

isolationist after the war you tear that

up you put a hundred thousand troops in

Europe for over 40 years

so total reversal of security policy

anything else yes you tear up the

eleventh commandment

national sovereignty before the war he

treated national sovereignty as so

sacrosanct that you weren’t even willing

to join the League of Nations after the

war he found the United Nations you

found the Organisation for Economic

Cooperation and Development you found

the IMF you encouraged Europe to create

the European community all systems for

mutual government support

that is still the waterfront of

effective policies aid trade security

governments of course the details of

policy are going to be different because

the challenge is different it’s not

rebuilding Europe it’s with reversing

the divergence of the bottom billion so

that they actually catch up is that

easier or harder we need to be at least

as serious as we were then now today I’m

going to take just one of those four I’m

going to take the one that sounds the

weakest the one that’s just motherhood

and apple pie government’s mutual

systems of support for governance and

I’m going to show you one idea in how we

could do something to strengthen

governance and I’m going to show you

that that is enormous ly important now

the opportunity we’re going to look to

is is a genuine basis for optimism about

the bottom billion and that is the

commodity booms the commodity booms are

pumping unprecedented amounts of money

into many they’re not all of the

countries of the bottom billion partly

they’re pumping money in because

commodity prices are high but it’s not

just that there’s also a range of new

discoveries

Uganda’s just discovered oil and about

the most disastrous location on earth

Ghana’s discovered oil Guinea has got a

huge new exploit exploitation of iron

ore coming out of ground so mass of new

discoveries between them these new

revenue flows dwarfed aid just to give

you one at one example and Goler alone

is getting 50 billion dollars a year in

oil

new the entire aid flows to the sixty

countries of the bottom billion last

year with thirty four billion so the the

the flow of resources from the commodity

booms to the bottom billion Oh without

precedent so there’s the optimism

question is how is it going to help

their development it’s a huge

opportunity for transformational

development will Italy take them so here

comes a bit of science and this is a bit

of science I’ve done since the bottom

billion so it’s new I’ve looked to see

what is the relationship between higher

commodity prices of exports and the

growth of commodity exporting countries

and I’ve not globally I’ve taken all the

countries in the world for the last 40

years and look to see what the

relationship is and the short-run say

the first five to seven years is just

great

in fact it’s hunky-dory everything goes

up to get more money because he terms a

trade and improve but also that drives

up output across the board so GDP goes

up a lot fantastic

that’s the short-run and how about the

long-run come back 15 years later

well the short-run it’s hunky-dory that

the long run is Humpty Dumpty you go up

in the short run but then most societies

historically have ended up worse than if

they’d had no booms at all that is not a

forecast about how commodity prices go

it’s a forecast of the consequences the

long-term consequences for growth of an

increase in prices so what goes wrong

why is there this resource curses is

called and again I’ve looked at that and

it turns out that the critical issue is

the level of governance the initial

level of economic governance when there

is all spoons accrue in fact if you’ve

got good enough governance there is no

resource boom you go up in the short

and then you are up even more in the

long term that’s Norway the richest

country in Europe its Australia it’s

Canada the resource curse is entirely

confined to countries below a threshold

of governments they still go up in the

short run that’s what we’re seeing

across the bottom billion at the moment

the best growth rates they’ve had ever

the question is whether the short run

will persist with bad governance

historically over the last 40 years it

hasn’t countries like Nigeria which are

worse off than if they never had oil so

there’s a threshold level above which

you go up in the long term below which

you go down just a benchmark that

threshold it’s about the governance

level of Portugal in the mid-1980s so

the question is of the bottom billion

above or below that threshold now

there’s one big change since the

commodity booms of 1970s and that is the

spread of democracy so I thought well

maybe that is the thing which is

transform governance in the bottom

billion maybe we can be more optimistic

because of the spread of democracy so I

looked democracy does have significant

effects and unfortunately their adverse

democracies make even more of a mess of

these resorts films than autocracies at

that stage I just wanted to abandon the

research but

it turns out that democracy is a little

bit more complicated than that because

through two distinct aspects of

democracy

there’s electoral competition which

determines how you choir power and the

checks and balances which determine how

you use power it turns out that

electoral competition is the thing

that’s doing the damage with democracy

where our strong checks and balances

make resource looms good and so what the

countries of the bottom billion need is

very strong checks and balances they

haven’t got them they’ve got instant

democracy in the 1990s elections without

checks and balances how can we help

improve governments and introduce checks

and balances in all the societies of the

bottom billion there are intense

struggles to do just that the simple

proposal is that we should have some

international standards which will be

voluntary but which would spell out the

key decision points the need to be taken

in order for to harness these resource

revenues we know these international

standards work because we’ve already got

one it’s called the extractive

industries transparency initiative that

is the very simple idea that governments

should report to their citizens

what revenues they have no sooner was it

proposed than reformers in Nigeria

adopted it pushed it had published the

revenues in the paper

Nigerian newspaper circulation spiked

people wanted to know what their

government was getting in terms of

revenue so we know it works

what would the content be of these

international standards I can’t go

through all of them but I’ll give you an

example the first is how to take the

resources out of the ground the economic

process is taking the resources out of

the ground and putting assets on top of

the ground and the first step in that is

selling the rights to resource

extraction you know how rights resource

extraction are being sold at the moment

how they’ve been sold over the last 40

years

her company flies in does a deal with a

minister and that’s great for the

company and it’s quite often great for

the minister and it’s not great for the

country there’s a very simple

institutional technology which can

transform that and it’s called verified

auctions the the public agency with the

greatest expertise on earth is of course

the Treasury that is the British

Treasury and the British Treasury

decided that it would sell the rights to

third generation mobile phones by

working out what those rights were worth

now it worked out they were worth two

billion pounds just in time the set of

economists got there and said why not

try an auction it’ll reveal the value it

went for twenty billion pounds through

all if the British Treasury can be out

by a factor of ten think what the

Ministry of Finance in Sierra Leone is

going to be like when I put that from

the president of Sierra Leone the next

day yes the World Bank descend on the

team to give expertise on how to conduct

auctions there are five such decision

points each one needs an international

standard if we could do it we would

change the world we would be helping the

Reformers in these societies who are

struggling for change that our modest

role we cannot change these societies

but we can help the people in these

societies who are struggling and usually

failing because the odds are so stacked

against them and yet we’ve not got these

rules if you think about it the cost of

promulgating international rules is

silly nothing why on earth are they not

there I realized that the reason they’re

not there is that until we have a

critical mass of informed citizens in

our own societies politicians will get

away with gestures the

unless we have an informed society what

politicians do especially in relation to

Africa is gestures things that look good

but don’t work and so I realized we had

to go through the business of building

an informed citizenry that’s why I broke

all the professional rules of conduct

for an economist and I wrote an

economics book that you could read on a

beach however I have to say the process

of communication does not come naturally

to me this is why on this stage but it’s

alarming right I grew up in a culture of

self-effacement my wife showed me a blog

comment on one of my last talks and the

blog comment said Collier is not

charismatic

that is arguments are compelling if

[Applause]

if you agree with that sentiment and if

you agree that we need a critical mass

of informed citizenry you will realize

that I need you please become

ambassadors thank you

[Applause]

[Applause]

[音乐]

[音乐]

所以我们敢不敢乐观

底层十亿人的

论点是 10 亿人已经停止

生活在

停滞了 40 年的经济中,因此

与其他人不同,

所以真正的 提出的问题不是

我们能否保持乐观,而是我们如何才能

给这十亿人带来可信的

希望,在我看来,这是

目前发展的根本挑战 我

要为您提供的是一个秘诀

两种力量的结合

为善的世界,这

是同情和开明的自利同情的联盟,

因为

十亿人生活在

没有提供可信希望的社会中,这

是人类悲剧开明的

自利,因为如果这种经济

分歧再持续四

十年 随着全球社会融合

,这

将为我们的孩子制造一场

噩梦 严肃

的是改变世界的联盟 那么

认真地为最

底层的十亿人提供希望意味着什么

世界地区这只是一个

很好的线索,除了你必须回去

很长一段时间 上一次富裕

世界认真考虑开发

另一个地区是在 1940 年代后期

,富裕世界就是你美国和

需要的地区 要发展的是

我的世界 欧洲那是战后的欧洲

为什么美国变得严肃它

不仅仅是对欧洲的同情,

尽管你知道你必须这样做,

因为在 19 世纪 40 年代后期

,中欧的一个又一个国家

是 陷入苏联集团,所以

你知道你别无选择欧洲不得不

被拖入经济发展所以

你上次认真做了什么

是的你有一个大的援助

计划谢谢你 你非常好,那是

元帅援助,我们需要再做一次

援助是解决方案的一部分,

但你还有什么

做得好你撕毁了你的贸易政策,并

在战前完全逆转

美国在战后高度保护主义

你打开你的 市场到

欧洲你把欧洲拖进了

你的经济的复仇经济,你

通过建立

关税和贸易总协定使贸易自由化制度化,

所以贸易政策的完全逆转

你做了什么是的,你

在战前完全逆转了你的安全政策

你的安全政策

在战后是孤立主义的 你撕毁了它

你在欧洲部署了 10 万军队

40 多年

所以完全颠覆了安全政策

如此

神圣,以至于战后你甚至

不愿意加入国际联盟,

他找到了联合国 ns 你

找到了经济

合作与发展组织 你找到

了国际货币基金组织 你鼓励欧洲

创建欧洲共同体

政府相互支持

的所有系统仍然是

有效政策的前沿 援助贸易安全

政府当然

政策的细节将是 不同,

因为挑战不同它不是

重建欧洲而是扭转

底层十亿人的分歧,

以便他们真正赶上是

更容易或更难我们需要至少

像我们现在一样认真今天我

要采取 只是这四个中

的一个,我将采用听起来

最弱的一个,即母亲身份

和苹果派政府

对治理的相互支持系统,

我将向您展示一个想法,即我们

如何做一些事情来加强

治理,我将向您

展示这非常重要,现在

我们要寻找的机会

是 opti 的真正基础

对底层十亿人的误解,那就是

商品繁荣 商品繁荣正在

向许多人注入前所未有的大量资金 他们并不是

底层十亿人的所有国家,部分原因

是因为

商品价格很高,但

不仅仅是 还有一系列新

发现

乌干达刚刚发现的石油以及

地球上最灾难性的位置

加纳发现的石油 几内亚有了

巨大的新开采 铁矿石开采

从地下出来 所以

它们之间的大量新发现 这些新的

收入流相形见绌 援助只是

举个例子,仅 Goler 每年

就获得 500 亿美元的

石油

新的全部援助去年流向了 340 亿美元中的 60

个国家,

因此来自大宗商品的资源流动

繁荣到底部十亿哦,没有

先例,所以有一个乐观的

问题是它将如何帮助

他们的发展这是一个巨大的

机会 为转型

发展提供动力

大宗商品出口国的增长,但

我没有全球化我

在过去 40 年里把世界上所有的国家都带走了

,看看它们

之间的关系是什么,短期来看

,前五到七年很好

事实上,

为了获得更多的钱,一切都上涨了,因为他

认为交易和改善,但也推动

了全面的产出,所以 GDP

上升了很多

,这是短期的,而

长期回来怎么样 15 年后,

从短期来看

,长期是矮胖子,你会

在短期内上升,但从

历史上看,大多数社会最终都比

没有繁荣时更糟糕,这不是

预测 关于如何方便 价格上涨

它是对价格上涨

对增长的长期影响的后果的预测

所以出了什么问题

为什么会出现这种资源诅咒

我又看了一遍

,结果发现关键问题是

治理水平 经济治理的初始

水平

当所有的勺子都积累起来 事实上,如果你

有足够好的治理,就没有

资源繁荣,你在短期

内上升,然后你在长期内上升得更多,

这就是挪威 欧洲最富有的

国家它的澳大利亚它是

加拿大资源诅咒完全

局限于政府门槛以下

的国家他们在短期内仍然会上涨

这就是我们

目前在最底层的十亿人中

看到的最佳增长率 曾经

的问题是

,在过去的 40 年中,短期内治理

不善是否会持续

存在 这是一个阈值水平,从长远来看,高于该阈值水平,低于该阈值水平

只是一个阈值的基准,

与 1980 年代中期葡萄牙的治理水平有关,

所以问题是底部十亿

高于或低于该阈值

1970 年代商品繁荣以来的一个重大变化,那就是

民主的传播,所以我认为

这可能是

改变底层

十亿人的治理也许我们可以

因为民主的传播而更加乐观,所以我

认为民主确实如此 有显着的

影响,不幸的是,他们不利的

民主制度使

这些度假电影比独裁制度更加混乱。在

那个阶段我只是想放弃

研究,

但事实证明民主

比那更复杂一些,因为

通过两个不同的方面

民主

有选举竞争

决定你如何唱诗班权力

和制衡决定

你如何使用权力 事实证明,

选举竞争是对

民主造成损害的事情

,我们强有力的制衡

使资源变得很好,因此

底层十亿国家需要的是

非常强大的制衡,他们

没有得到它们

在 1990 年代的选举中实现了即时民主,没有

制衡 我们如何帮助

改善政府并

在所有底层 10 亿社会中引入制衡机制

为做到这一点进行了激烈的斗争,简单的

建议是我们应该

制定一些国际标准 这将是

自愿的,但将阐明为利用这些资源收入

而需要采取的关键决策点

我们知道这些国际

标准是有效的,因为我们已经制定了

一项称为采掘

业透明度倡议的倡议

一个简单的想法,即政府

应该立即向其公民报告

他们拥有的收入

提议比尼日利亚的改革者

采纳它推动它已经

报纸上公布了收入尼日利亚报纸发行量飙升

人们想知道他们的

政府在收入方面得到了什么,

所以我们知道它有效

,这些国际标准的内容是什么

我可以'

不会全部介绍,但我会给你举个

例子 第一个是如何

从地下

获取资源 经济过程是从地下获取资源

并将资产

放在地上,第一步是 那就是

出售资源

开采权 你知道现在资源

开采权是

如何出售的 在过去的 40 年里它们是如何出售的

与一位部长达成了一项协议

,这对

公司来说很好,而且相当 通常

对部长有利,对

国家

不利 世界上

最专业的 blic 机构当然

是财政部,即英国

财政部,英国财政部

决定出售

第三代手机的权利,通过计算

这些权利的价值,

现在计算出它们值两个

十亿英镑正好赶上

这群经济学家并说为什么不

尝试拍卖它会揭示它的价值是

200 亿

英镑如果英国财政部能够

以十倍的价格出售

塞拉利昂的

情况就像我第二天从塞拉利昂总统那里说的那样

是的,世界银行加入

团队,就如何进行拍卖提供专业

知识 我们可以做到 我们会

改变世界 我们会帮助

这些社会中的改革者,他们

正在为改变而奋斗 我们的微薄

角色 我们无法改变这些社会

但是我们可以帮助这些

社会中正在挣扎并且通常会

失败的人们,因为他们的机会如此

之多,但是

如果您考虑一下,我们还没有这些规则,

颁布国际规则的成本是

愚蠢的,为什么在地球上 他们不在

那里 我意识到他们不在那里的原因

是,除非我们

我们自己的社会中拥有足够数量的知情公民,否则政客们将侥幸

逃脱,

除非我们拥有一个知情的社会,否则

政客们在非洲方面所做的事情

是 摆出看起来不错

但行不通的手势,所以我意识到我们

必须通过建立知情公民的业务,

这就是为什么我打破

了经济学家的所有专业行为规则,我写了一

本你可以继续阅读的经济学书 一个

海滩,但是我不得不说

,交流的过程对我来说并不是自然而然的

,这就是为什么在这个舞台上,但

令人震惊的是,我在自我效能的文化中

长大 我的妻子给我看了

一篇关于我最后一次谈话的

博客评论,博客评论说科利尔没有

魅力

,如果

[掌声]

如果你同意这种观点,并且如果

你同意我们需要

大量知情的人,那么争论是有说服力的 市民们,你们会

意识到我需要你们,请成为

大使,谢谢

[鼓掌]

[鼓掌]