Why gun violence cant be our new normal Dan Gross

OK, so, confession:

I’ve always been weirdly
obsessed with advertising.

I remember watching
Saturday morning cartoons,

paying more attention to the commercials

than to the shows,

trying to figure out how they were trying
to get inside my head.

Ultimately, that led me to my dream job.

I became a partner
at a big New York ad agency.

But then, all of that suddenly changed
on February 23, 1997,

when my little brother Matt
was shot in the head

in a shooting that happened
on the observation deck

of the Empire State Building.

Suddenly, my family was thrown
into the middle of a nightmare,

being told that my brother
was going to die,

actually being given the opportunity
to say goodbye to him,

then several emergency brain surgeries

and now what’s amounted, for Matt,

to a lifetime spent courageously
recovering from a traumatic brain injury.

He is definitely my hero.

But as much as (Applause) –
yeah, deserves it –

(Applause)

But as much as this tragedy
was a nightmare for my family,

I often think about how much worse
it could have been;

in fact, how much worse
it is for the 90 families every day

who aren’t as fortunate,

who lose loved ones – brothers,
sisters, sons, daughters, parents.

They don’t all make national headlines.

In fact, most of them don’t.

They go largely unnoticed,

in a nation that’s kind of come to accept
a disgraceful national epidemic

as some kind of new normal.

So I quit my job in advertising

to try and do something about
this disgraceful national epidemic,

because I came to realize

that the challenges
to preventing gun violence

are actually the same ones
that made me love advertising,

which is to try to figure out
how to engage people.

Only instead of doing it to sell products,

doing it to save lives.

And that comes down to
finding common ground,

where what I want overlaps
with what you want.

And you might be surprised to learn,
when it comes to gun violence,

just how much common ground there is.

Let’s look, for example,
at people who love to hunt,

a sport enjoyed by millions across the US.

It’s a proud tradition. Families.

In some places,

the first day of hunting season
is actually a school holiday.

What do hunters want?

Well, they want to hunt.
They love their guns.

They believe deeply

in the Second Amendment right
to own those guns.

But that doesn’t mean
there isn’t common ground.

In fact, there’s a lot of it,

starting with the basic idea
of keeping guns out of dangerous hands.

This isn’t about taking
certain guns away from all people.

It’s about keeping all guns
away from certain people,

and it’s the people that, it turns out,
we all agree shouldn’t have guns:

convicted violent criminals,
domestic abusers,

the dangerously mentally ill.

We can all appreciate

how Brady background checks
have been incredibly effective

in keeping guns
out of those dangerous hands.

In 20 years, Brady background checks
at federally licensed firearm dealers

have blocked 2.4 million gun sales

to those people that we all agree
shouldn’t have guns.

(Applause)

And whether you love guns or hate guns,
you probably also appreciate

that there shouldn’t be thousands
of gun sales every day

at guns shows or online

without those Brady background checks,

just like there shouldn’t be two lines
to get on an airplane –

one with security
and one with no security.

And –

(Applause)

And the numbers show the overwhelming
agreement among the American public:

90 percent of Americans support
expanding Brady background checks

to all gun sales – including
90 percent of Republicans,

more than 80 percent of gun owners,

more than 70 percent of NRA members.

This is not a controversial idea.

In fact, only six percent
of the American public disagrees.

That’s about the percentage
of the American public

that believes the moon landing was a fake.

(Laughter)

And it’s also about the percentage
that believes the government

is putting mind-controlling technology
in our TV broadcast signals.

That’s the extent to which we agree
about background checks.

But what about the 300 million guns

already out there in homes across America?

Well first, it’s important to realize

that those guns are mostly
in the hands and homes

of decent, law-abiding people
like you and me,

who want what we all want –
including keeping our families safe.

In fact, that’s why more and more people
are choosing to own guns.

Ten years ago, 42 percent
of the American public

believed – incorrectly – that a gun
makes your home safer.

Today, that number is 63 percent.

Why?

I kind of hate to say it,

because it gets to the dark
underbelly of advertising,

which is if you tell
a big enough lie enough times,

eventually that lie becomes the truth.

And that’s exactly what’s happened here.

The corporate gun lobby
has spent billions of dollars

blocking the CDC from doing research
into the public health epidemic

of gun violence;

blocking pediatricians
from talking to parents

about the dangers of guns in the home;

blocking smart-gun technology
and other technology

that would prevent kids
from firing parents' guns

and would save lives.

They’re desperate to hide the truth,

because they view the truth
as a threat to their bottom line.

And every day,

people are dying as a result.

And a lot of those people are children.

Every day in the US,

nine kids are just shot unintentionally.

900 children and teens
take their own lives every year.

And here’s the thing:
they’re almost all with a parent’s gun.

Even two-thirds of school shootings
happen with a gun taken from the home,

including the terrible tragedy

at Sandy Hook.

I meet so many of these parents;

it’s the most heartbreaking
part of my job.

These are not bad people.

They’re just living with the unimaginable
consequences of a very bad decision,

made based on very bad information

that was put into their minds
by very bad people,

who know good and well
the misery that they’re causing,

but just don’t care.

And the result is a nightmare –

not only for families like mine,

but for, really, at the end
of the day, all of us.

But I’m not here to talk
about the nightmare of gun violence.

I’m here to talk about our dream,
and it’s a dream we all share,

which is the dream
of a better, safer, future.

For my organization,
for the Brady Campaign,

that dream is reflected in the bold goal

to cut the number of gun deaths
in the US in half by 2025.

And I hope to leave
all of you here tonight

with a strong sense of exactly why
that dream is so absolutely within reach.

Because folks,

for every great movement around the world,

there’s a moment
where you can look back and say,

“That’s when things
really started to change.”

And I’m here to say

that for the movement
to end gun violence in America,

that moment is here.

(Applause)

We are so clearly at a tipping point,

because the American public
has come together by the millions

like never before,
based on that common ground,

to say, “Enough.”

Enough of the mass shootings
in malls and movie theaters

and churches and schools.

Enough of the daily terror
of gun violence in homes and streets

that’s claimed the lives of women
and young black men

in staggering proportions.

Enough of easy access to guns

by the people that we all agree
shouldn’t have them.

And enough of a small group
of craven politicians

putting the interests
of the corporate gun lobby

ahead of the people
they have been elected to represent.

Enough.

(Applause)

And the really exciting thing is,
it’s not just the usual suspects like me

that are saying it anymore.

It’s so much bigger than that.

And if you want proof,

let’s start where most conversations
in the US seem to start –

with Kim Kardashian.

(Laughter)

And here’s the thing:
it’s not really a joke.

I mean, think about when issues change.

It’s when they go from being
political and advocacy issues

to being part of pop culture,

voices coming from everywhere,
celebrities using their platforms,

musicians, athletes.

The NBA has come forward.

Conservative pundits that you never
would have imagined

have come forward.

There’s real cultural change –

I even hear there’s a TED Talk
about it this year.

That’s the extent to which
this cultural change is happening.

And yes, Kim Kardashian has made
an unsolicited passionate appeal

to her 35 million Twitter followers

for expanded background checks.

Let’s look at the political elections
that are heating up.

This used to be the classic
third-rail issue for Democrats.

Couldn’t run from it fast enough.

Now candidates are running on it.

Some are being forced
to reverse very bad positions

they defended very comfortably,
until very recently.

For somebody like me,

watching people wave around
their negative NRA ratings –

it’s almost surreal to watch.

We’re still outfunded, yes,
by the corporate gun lobby,

and ultimately that needs to change.

But you know what?

We’re smarter and we’re scrappier,
and we have the truth on our side.

And we’re on offense.

You know, they say that the Internet
democratizes information.

Social media and some
of the organizing tools that plug into it

have democratized activism.

It’s allowed us to show what 90 percent
support really looks like.

Sometimes I think of it –

you know, we’re converging
and attacking instantly by the millions,

kind of like white blood cells.

It’s enabled us to start to really
close – and this is the bottom line –

close that disgraceful disconnect

between what the American public wants

and what our elected leaders
are doing about it.

Until recently,

the narrative in Congress
was that calls from the other side,

from that six percent,

outnumbered calls from our side 10 to one.

We’re flipping that narrative on its head.

After that recent terrible tragedy
in San Bernardino,

we jammed Congressional switchboards.

We put 15,000 calls
into Congress in 24 hours.

And you know what?

We got a vote on a bill

that nobody thought was going to see
the light of day anytime soon.

We’re seeing real movement
to repeal some of the most evil,

ugly gun lobby legislation
passed over the last dark decade.

The stranglehold of the gun lobby
is clearly being broken.

We’ve seen President Obama’s
historic executive actions.

They don’t go all the way,

but they are going to save lives,

because they expand
Brady background checks

to thousands of gun sales
that didn’t have them previously.

And we’re marching across the country –
we’re not just waiting

for Congress to act; that would almost
be the definition of insanity.

We’re marching across the country,

state by state, marriage-equality style.

And you know what? We’re winning.

Congress is almost always
the last to wake up and realize

that it’s on the wrong side of history.

And when they do, it’s always
because the American public shakes them.

And that’s exactly
what we’re doing right now,

as we’re in this tipping point.

You know, recently I was flying
cross-country to give a speech

to a large group like this,
although far less intimidating,

and the woman sitting next to me
happened to be binge-watching

one of my all-time favorite
TV shows, “Mad Men,”

a period TV show about advertising

in the 1960s.

And as I was trying to think
about how to end my remarks,

I’d glance up at her screen
every now and then,

and it seemed that every time I did,

I’d see somebody smoking
in an office or around children

or while pregnant or drinking and driving

or driving without seat belts
or sexually harassing a coworker.

And ultimately it dawned on me:

what tremendous inspiration

to those of us who have this dream
to end gun violence.

I mean, think about how much
the world has changed

in a relatively short period of time,

how all those behaviors that were once
considered commonplace or normal –

some even glamorous or sexy –

have become stigmatized
in just a generation or two,

once they became conversations
about our common ground.

That is the magnitude of the change
we have the potential to create

around gun violence.

And that’s my dream,

that maybe someday,

some period TV show will depict
the terrible nightmare of gun violence,

and a future generation of children
might only be able to imagine

how terrible it must have been.

Thank you.

(Applause)

Thank you.

(Applause)

Thank you.

(Applause)

好吧,所以,坦白:

我一直
对广告着迷。

我记得我看
周六早上的卡通片,

更多地关注广告而

不是节目,

试图弄清楚它们是如何
试图进入我的脑海的。

最终,这让我找到了我梦寐以求的工作。

我成为
纽约一家大型广告公司的合伙人。

但随后,这一切
在 1997 年 2 月 23 日突然发生了变化,

当时我的弟弟马特
在帝国大厦观景台

发生的枪击事件中头部中弹

突然间,我的家人
陷入了一场噩梦,

被告知我的
兄弟即将死去,

实际上得到了
与他告别的机会,

然后进行了几次紧急脑部手术

,现在对马特来说,这

相当于一生 勇敢地
从创伤性脑损伤中恢复过来。

他绝对是我的英雄。

但尽管(掌声)——
是的,应得的——

(掌声

)尽管这场悲剧
对我的家人来说是一场噩梦,但

我经常想
它可能会变得更糟;

事实上,对于

每天没有那么幸运

、失去亲人——兄弟、
姐妹、儿子、女儿、父母的90个家庭来说,情况要糟糕得多。

他们并不都成为全国头条新闻。

事实上,他们中的大多数人都没有。

他们在很大程度上被忽视了,

在一个开始接受
一种可耻的全国流行病

作为某种新常态的国家。

所以我辞掉了广告的工作,

试图为
这个可耻的全国性流行病做点什么,

因为我开始意识到

防止枪支暴力

的挑战实际上
是让我喜欢广告的那些挑战,

那就是试图弄清楚
如何 吸引人们。

只是不是为了销售产品而这样做,

而是为了拯救生命而这样做。

这归结为
找到共同点

,我想要的
与你想要的重叠。

你可能会惊讶地发现,
在枪支暴力方面

,有多少共同点。

例如,让我们
看看喜欢打猎的人,

这项运动在美国有数百万人喜欢。

这是一个值得骄傲的传统。 家庭。

在某些地方,

狩猎季节的第一天
实际上是学校假期。

猎人想要什么?

嗯,他们想打猎。
他们喜欢他们的枪。

他们

深信第二修正案
有权拥有这些枪支。

但这并不意味着
没有共同点。

事实上,它有很多,


让枪支远离危险之手的基本理念开始。

这并不是
要从所有人手中夺走某些枪支。

这是关于让所有枪支
远离某些

人,事实证明,
我们都同意不应该拥有枪支的人:

被定罪的暴力罪犯、
家庭虐待者

、危险的精神病患者。

我们都可以欣赏

布雷迪的背景调查
如何非常有效

地让枪支
远离那些危险的人。

20 年来,
联邦许可的枪支经销商的布雷迪背景调查

已经阻止了 240 万支枪支销售

给那些我们都认为
不应该拥有枪支的人。

(掌声

)不管你喜欢枪支还是讨厌枪支,
你可能也很欣赏

,如果没有布雷迪背景调查,枪支展或网上每天不应该有成千上万
的枪支销售

就像不应该有两条
线一样 在飞机上——

一个有安全保障
,一个没有安全保障。

而且——

(掌声

)这些数字显示
了美国公众的压倒性共识:

90% 的美国人支持
将布雷迪背景调查扩大

到所有枪支销售——包括
90% 的共和党人、

超过 80% 的枪支拥有者、

超过 70 NRA 成员的百分比。

这不是一个有争议的想法。

事实上,只有 6%
的美国公众不同意。

这大约

是认为登月是假的美国公众的百分比。

(笑声

) 这也与
相信政府

在我们的电视广播信号中使用精神控制技术的百分比有关。

这就是我们
同意背景调查的程度。

但是

,美国各地家庭中已有的 3 亿支枪呢?

首先,重要的是要认识到

,这些枪支大多
掌握在像你我这样

正派、守法的人的手中和家中

他们想要我们都想要的东西——
包括保证我们家人的安全。

事实上,这就是为什么越来越多的
人选择拥有枪支的原因。

十年前,42%
的美国公众

认为——错误地——枪支
让你的家更安全。

今天,这个数字是 63%。

为什么?

我有点讨厌这样说,

因为它
触及了广告的阴暗面

,如果你撒
了足够大的谎言足够多次,

最终那个谎言就会变成事实。

这正是这里发生的事情。

企业枪支游说团体
花费了数十亿美元,

阻止 CDC 对枪支暴力
这一公共卫生流行病进行研究

阻止儿科医生
与父母

谈论家中枪支的危险;

阻止智能枪
技术和

其他阻止孩子
向父母开枪

并挽救生命的技术。

他们不顾一切地隐藏真相,

因为他们认为真相
是对他们底线的威胁。

每天,

人们都因此而死去。

其中很多人是孩子。

在美国,每天都有

九个孩子被无意中枪杀。 每年有

900 名儿童和
青少年自杀。

事情是这样的:
他们几乎都带着父母的枪。

甚至三分之二的学校枪击
事件都发生在从家里拿走的枪上,

包括

桑迪胡克的可怕悲剧。

我遇到了很多这样的父母;


是我工作中最令人心碎的部分。

这些人都不是坏人。

他们只是生活在
一个非常糟糕的决定的难以想象的后果中,这

是基于非常糟糕的人输入的非常糟糕的信息

做出

的,他们非常了解
他们正在造成的痛苦,

但只是不要 关心。

结果是一场噩梦——

不仅对像我这样的家庭,

而且对,真的,在
一天结束时,我们所有人。

但我不是来
谈论枪支暴力的噩梦。

我在这里谈论我们
的梦想,这是我们所有人共同

的梦想
,是更美好、更安全、未来的梦想。

对于我的组织,
对于布雷迪运动来说,

这个梦想反映在


2025 年将美国枪支死亡人数减少一半的大胆目标中。

我希望
今晚让你们所有人都

清楚为什么会
这样 梦想是那么的触手可及。

因为人们,

对于世界各地的每一次伟大运动,

都有一个时刻
,你可以回顾并说,

“那是事情
真正开始改变的时候。”

我在这里要说的

是,
对于结束美国枪支暴力的运动,

那一刻就在这里。

(掌声)

我们显然处于一个临界点,

因为美国公众
以前所未有的方式聚集了数百万人


基于这个共同点

,说“够了”。 商场、电影院、教堂和学校

发生的大规模枪击事件已经够多了

家庭和街道上每天发生的枪支暴力恐怖已经足够了,这些暴力以惊人

的比例夺走了女性
和年轻黑人男性的生命

我们都同意
不应该拥有枪支的人足够容易获得枪支。

And enough of a small group
of craven politicians

putting the interests
of the corporate gun lobby

ahead of the people
they have been elected to represent.

足够的。

(掌声

)真正令人兴奋的是
,不再只是像我这样的通常的嫌疑人

在说它。

它比那大得多。

如果你想要证据,

让我们从美国大多数对话似乎开始的地方
开始——

与金·卡戴珊 (Kim Kardashian)。

(笑声

) 事情是
这样的:这不是一个玩笑。

我的意思是,想想问题何时发生变化。

当他们从
政治和宣传问题

变成流行文化的一部分时,

来自世界各地的声音,
使用他们平台的名人,

音乐家,运动员。

NBA已经挺身而出。

您从未想象过的保守派专家站

出来了。

有真正的文化变革——

我什至听说今年有一个 TED 演讲

这就是
这种文化变化正在发生的程度。

是的,金·卡戴
珊主动

向她的 3500 万推特粉丝发出热情呼吁,

要求扩大背景调查。

让我们看看
正在升温的政治选举。

这曾经是民主党经典的
第三轨问题。

无法足够快地逃离它。

现在候选人正在运行它。 直到最近,

有些人
被迫扭转

他们非常轻松地捍卫的非常糟糕的立场

对于像我这样的人来说,

看着人们在
NRA 的负面评价中挥手致意——

这几乎是超现实的。

是的
,企业枪支游说团体的资金仍然不足

,最终需要改变。

但你知道吗?

我们更聪明,我们更斗志昂扬
,我们拥有真理。

我们正在进攻。

你知道,他们说互联网
使信息民主化。

社交媒体和
插入其中的一些组织工具使

激进主义民主化。

它使我们能够展示 90%
支持的真实情况。

有时我会想到——

你知道,我们正在汇聚
并立即受到数百万的攻击,

有点像白细胞。

It’s enabled us to start to really
close – and this is the bottom line –

close that disgraceful disconnect

between what the American public wants

and what our elected leaders
are doing about it.

直到最近

,国会
的说法是,来自另一方的电话,

即 6% 的

电话,超过了我们这边的电话 10 比 1。

我们正在颠覆这种说法。

在圣贝纳迪诺最近发生的可怕悲剧之后

我们堵塞了国会的总机。

我们
在 24 小时内向国会打了 15,000 通电话。

你知道吗?

我们对一项

没有人认为
很快就会出现的法案进行了投票。

我们看到
了废除过去黑暗十年中通过的一些最邪恶、最

丑陋的枪支游说立法的真正运动

枪支大厅的束缚
显然正在被打破。

我们已经看到了奥巴马总统的
历史性行政行为。

他们不会一路走下去,

但他们会拯救生命,

因为他们将
布雷迪背景调查扩大

到了数千支以前没有的枪支销售

我们正在全国范围内游行——
我们不只是在

等待国会采取行动; 这
几乎就是精神错乱的定义。

我们正在全国范围内游行,一个

州一个州,婚姻平等的风格。

你知道吗? 我们赢了。

国会几乎
总是最后一个醒来并

意识到它站在历史错误的一边。

当他们这样做时,总是
因为美国公众动摇了他们。


正是我们现在正在做的事情,

因为我们正处于这个临界点。

你知道,最近我
飞到全国各地去给

这样的一大群人发表演讲,
虽然没有那么吓人,

而坐在我旁边的那个女人
恰好在

看我一直以来最喜欢的
电视节目之一,” 广告狂人”,

一部关于 1960 年代广告的时期电视节目

当我试图
思考如何结束我的发言时,

我会不时抬头看看她的屏幕

,似乎每次我这样做时,

我都会看到有人
在办公室或孩子周围吸烟,

或者 怀孕或酒后

驾车或未系安全带驾驶
或性骚扰同事。

最终,我恍然大悟:

对于我们这些梦想结束枪支暴力的人来说,这是多么巨大的鼓舞

我的意思是,想想
世界

在相对较短的时间内发生了

多大的变化,所有那些曾经
被认为是司空见惯或正常的行为——

有些甚至是迷人或性感的——

在短短一两代人的时间里,

一次又一次地被污名化了 它们变成了
关于我们共同点的对话。

这就是
我们有可能

围绕枪支暴力创造的变化幅度。

这就是我的梦想

,也许有一天,

某个时期的电视节目将描绘
枪支暴力的可怕噩梦,

而未来一代的孩子
可能只能想象

它一定有多可怕。

谢谢你。

(掌声)

谢谢。

(掌声)

谢谢。

(掌声)