Could we treat spinal cord injuries with asparagus Andrew Pelling

So I’m here today surrounded
by all these fruits and vegetables,

because these are the subjects
of my experiments.

Now, bear with me for just a second,

but about a decade ago

my team started to rethink
how we make materials

for reconstructing
damaged or diseased human tissues,

and we made the totally
unexpected discovery

that plants could be used
for this purpose.

In fact, we invented a way
to take these plants

and strip them of all their DNA
and their cells,

leaving behind natural fibers.

And these fibers
could then be used as a scaffold

for reconstructing living tissue.

Now I know this is a little weird,

but in our very first
proof-of-concept experiment,

we took an apple,

carved it into the shape of a human ear,

and then we took that ear-shaped scaffold,

sterilized it, processed it

and coaxed human cells
to grow inside of it.

We then took the next step
and implanted it,

and we were able to demonstrate

that the scaffolds stimulated
the formation of blood vessels,

allowing the heart to keep them alive.

So not too long after
these discoveries were taking place,

I was at home cooking
asparagus for dinner,

and after cutting the ends off,

I was noticing that the stalks were full
of these microchanneled vascular bundles.

And it really reminded me

of a whole body of bioengineering effort
aimed at treating spinal cord injury.

Up to half a million people per year
suffer from this type of injury,

and the symptoms can range
from pain and numbness

to devastating traumas

that lead to a complete loss
of motor function and independence.

And in these forms of paralysis,

there’s no accepted treatment strategy,

but one possible solution

might be the use of a scaffold
that has microchannels

which may guide regenerating neurons.

So, could we use the asparagus
and its vascular bundles

to repair a spinal cord?

This is a really dumb idea.

First of all, humans aren’t plants.

Our cells have not evolved
to grow on plant polymers,

and plant tissues have no business
being found in your spinal cord.

And secondly,

ideally these types of scaffolds
should disappear over time,

leaving behind natural, healthy tissue.

But plant-based scaffolds don’t do that,

because we lack the enzymes
to break them down.

Funnily enough,

these properties were exactly why
we were having so much success.

Over the course of many experiments,

we were able to demonstrate

that the inertness of plant tissue
is exactly why it’s so biocompatible.

In a way, the body
almost doesn’t even see it,

but regenerating cells
benefit from its shape and stability.

Now this is all well and good,

but I constantly felt this weight of doubt

when it came to thinking
about spinal cords.

So many scientists were using
materials from traditional sources,

like synthetic polymers
and animal products –

even human cadavers.

I felt like a complete outsider

with no real right
to work on such a hard problem.

But because of this doubt,

I surrounded myself
with neurosurgeons and clinicians,

biochemists and bioengineers,

and we started to plan experiments.

The basic idea is that we
would take an animal,

anesthetize it,

expose its spinal cord

and sever it in the thoracic region,

rendering the animal a paraplegic.

We would then implant
an asparagus scaffold

between the severed
ends of the spinal cord

to act as a bridge.

Now this is crucially important.

We’re only using asparagus.

We’re not adding stem cells
or electrical stimulation

or exoskeletons

or physical therapy

or pharmaceuticals.

We’re simply investigating

if the microchannels in the scaffold alone

are enough to guide
the regeneration of neurons.

And here are the main results.

In this video, you can see an animal
about eight weeks after being paralyzed.

You can see she can’t move her back legs,

and she can’t lift herself up.

Now I know how difficult
this video is to watch.

My team struggled every day
with these types of experiments,

and we constantly asked ourselves
why we were doing this …

until we started to observe
something extraordinary.

This is an animal
that received an implant.

Now she’s not walking perfectly,

but she’s moving those back legs

and she’s even starting
to lift herself up.

And on a treadmill,

you can see those legs moving
in a coordinated fashion.

These are crucial signs of recovery.

Now we still have a lot of work to do,

and there are a lot
of questions to answer,

but this is the first time
anyone has shown

that plant tissues can be used
to repair such a complex injury.

Even so, we’ve been sitting
on this data for over five years.

Doubt drove us to repeat
these experiments again and again,

to the point of almost bankrupting my lab.

But I kept pushing,

because I knew these results could be
the start of something extraordinary.

And what’s just as exciting

is that my company is now translating
these discoveries into the clinic –

into the real world.

This technology has just been designated
a breakthrough medical device by the FDA.

And this designation means

that right now we’re in the midst
of planning human clinical trials

set to begin in about two years.

So I’d like to show you a prototype

of one of our state-of-the-art
spinal cord implants.

It’s still made from asparagus

and contains all of those microchannels.

And you can see that it moves and bends

and has the same feel as human tissue.

And you know,

I think the real innovation
is that we’re now able to design

or program the architecture and structure
of plant tissues in such a way

that they could direct cell growth
to address an unmet medical need.

As scientists,

we spend our lives
living on a knife’s edge.

On the one hand,

it’s our job to fundamentally
broaden the horizons

of human knowledge,

but at the same time,
we’re trained to doubt –

to doubt our data,
to doubt our experiments,

to doubt our own conclusions.

We spend our lives
crushed under the weight

of constant, unrelenting, never-ending
anxiety, uncertainty and self-doubt.

And this is something
I really struggle with.

But I think almost every
scientist can tell you

about the time they ignored those doubts

and did the experiment
that would never work.

And the thing is, every now and then,

one of those experiments works out.

The challenge we face
is that while doubt can be destructive

to your mental health,

it’s also the reason why scientific rigor
is such a potent tool for discovery.

It forces us to ask
the difficult questions

and repeat experiments.

Nothing about that is easy.

And often it becomes our responsibility

to bear the burden of the hard
and sometimes heart-wrenching experiment.

This ultimately leads
to the creation of new knowledge,

and in some really rare cases,

the type of innovation
that just might change a person’s life.

Thank you.

所以我今天在这里
被所有这些水果和蔬菜所包围,

因为这些
是我实验的对象。

现在,请稍等一下,

但大约十年前,

我的团队开始重新思考
我们如何制造

用于重建
受损或患病人体组织的材料

,我们完全
出乎意料地

发现植物可以
用于此目的。

事实上,我们发明了一种方法
来获取这些植物

并剥离它们所有的 DNA
和细胞,

留下天然纤维。

然后这些纤维
可以

用作重建活组织的支架。

现在我知道这有点奇怪,

但在我们的第一个
概念验证实验中,

我们拿了一个苹果,

把它雕刻成人耳的形状,

然后我们拿那个耳朵形状的支架,对其

进行消毒,加工 它

并诱使人体细胞
在其中生长。

然后我们采取了下一步
并将其植入

,我们能够

证明支架刺激
血管的形成,

让心脏保持活力。

所以在
这些发现发生后不久,

我正在家里煮
芦笋当晚餐

,切掉末端后,

我注意到茎杆上布满
了这些微通道维管束。

它真的让我

想起了旨在治疗脊髓损伤的整个生物工程努力

每年有多达 50 万人
遭受这种类型的伤害

,症状范围
从疼痛和麻木

到导致
运动功能和独立性完全丧失的毁灭性创伤。

在这些形式的瘫痪中,

没有公认的治疗策略,

但一种可能的解决方案

可能是使用

具有可引导再生神经元的微通道的支架。

那么,我们可以用芦笋
及其维管束

来修复脊髓吗?

这是一个非常愚蠢的想法。

首先,人不是植物。

我们的细胞还没有进化
到在植物聚合物上生长,

在你的脊髓中也找不到植物组织。

其次,

理想情况下,这些类型的支架
应该随着时间的推移而消失,

留下自然、健康的组织。

但是基于植物的支架不能做到这一点,

因为我们缺乏
分解它们的酶。

有趣的是,

这些属性正是
我们取得如此巨大成功的原因。

在许多实验过程中,

我们能够

证明植物组织的惰性
正是它如此具有生物相容性的原因。

在某种程度上,身体
几乎看不到它,

但再生细胞
受益于它的形状和稳定性。

现在这一切都很好,

但是当我想到脊髓时,我经常感到这种怀疑的重量

如此多的科学家正在使用
来自传统来源的材料,

例如合成聚合物
和动物产品——

甚至是人类尸体。

我觉得自己像一个完全的局外人

,没有真正的权利
来解决这样一个难题。

但由于这个疑问,


周围都是神经外科医生和临床医生、

生物化学家和生物工程师

,我们开始计划实验。

基本的想法是,我们
会取一只动物,对其进行

麻醉,

暴露其脊髓

并在胸部区域切断它,

使动物截瘫。

然后,我们将在脊髓切断的末端之间植入
一个芦笋支架

以充当桥梁。

现在这是至关重要的。

我们只用芦笋。

我们不会添加干细胞
或电刺激

或外骨骼

或物理疗法

或药物。

我们只是在调查

支架中的微通道

是否足以指导
神经元的再生。

以下是主要结果。

在这段视频中,您可以看到一只动物
在瘫痪大约八周后。

你可以看到她不能移动她的后腿

,她不能抬起自己。

现在我知道
这个视频有多难看。

我的团队每天都
在为这些类型的实验

而苦苦挣扎,我们不断地问自己
为什么要这样做……

直到我们开始观察到
一些非凡的东西。


是接受植入物的动物。

现在她的走路并不完美,

但她正在移动那些后腿

,甚至
开始抬起自己。

在跑步机上,

你可以看到那些腿
以协调的方式运动。

这些都是复苏的关键迹象。

现在我们还有很多工作要做,

还有
很多问题要回答,

但这是第一次
有人

证明植物组织可以
用来修复如此复杂的损伤。

即便如此,我们已经
坐在这些数据上五年多了。

怀疑驱使我们
一次又一次地重复这些实验

,以至于我的实验室几乎破产。

但我一直在努力,

因为我知道这些结果可能是
非凡事物的开始。

同样令人兴奋的

是,我的公司现在正在将
这些发现转化为临床——

转化为现实世界。

这项技术刚刚
被 FDA 指定为突破性医疗设备。

这个指定

意味着现在我们
正在计划

大约两年后开始的人体临床试验。

因此,我想向您展示

我们最先进的
脊髓植入物之一的原型。

它仍然由芦笋制成,

并包含所有这些微通道。

你可以看到它会移动和弯曲

并且具有与人体组织相同的感觉。

你知道,

我认为真正的创新
在于我们现在能够设计

或编程植物组织的结构和结构

,从而引导细胞生长
来解决未满足的医疗需求。

作为科学家,

我们一生都
生活在刀刃上。

一方面,

我们的工作是从根本上
拓宽

人类知识的视野,

但与此同时,
我们被训练去怀疑

——怀疑我们的数据
,怀疑我们的实验

,怀疑我们自己的结论。

我们在

持续不断的、无情的、永无止境的
焦虑、不确定性和自我怀疑的重压下度过了我们的生活。

这是
我真正挣扎的事情。

但我认为几乎每个
科学家都可以告诉你

他们忽略了这些疑虑

并进行
了永远行不通的实验的时间。

问题是,不时地,

其中一个实验会奏效。

我们面临的挑战
是,虽然怀疑可能会

破坏你的心理健康,

但这也是为什么科学严谨
是一种强大的发现工具的原因。

它迫使我们
提出困难的问题

并重复实验。

没有什么是容易的。

承担艰巨
且有时令人心痛的实验的负担往往成为我们的责任。

这最终导致
了新知识的创造

,在一些非常罕见的情况下

,这种创新
可能会改变一个人的生活。

谢谢你。