How we can improve maternal healthcare before during and after pregnancy Elizabeth Howell

It was chaos as I got off the elevator.

I was coming back on duty
as a resident physician

to cover the labor and delivery unit.

And all I could see was a swarm
of doctors and nurses

hovering over a patient in the labor room.

They were all desperately trying
to save a woman’s life.

The patient was in shock.

She had delivered a healthy baby boy
a few hours before I arrived.

Suddenly, she collapsed,
became unresponsive,

and had profuse uterine bleeding.

By the time I got to the room,

there were multiple doctors and nurses,
and the patient was lifeless.

The resuscitation team
tried to bring her back to life,

but despite everyone’s best efforts,

she died.

What I remember most about that day
was the father’s piercing cry.

It went through my heart
and the heart of everyone on that floor.

This was supposed to be
the happiest day of his life,

but instead it turned out
to be the worst day.

I wish I could say this tragedy
was an isolated incident,

but sadly, that’s not the case.

Every year in the United States,

somewhere between 700 and 900 women die

from a pregnancy-related cause.

The shocking part of this story

is that our maternal mortality rate
is actually higher

than all other high-income countries,

and our rates are far worse
for women of color.

Our rate of maternal mortality
actually increased over the last decade,

while other countries reduced their rates.

And the biggest paradox of all?

We spend more on health care
than any other country in the world.

Well, around the same time in residency
that this new mother lost her life,

I became a mother myself.

And even with all of my background
and training in the field,

I was taken aback
by how little attention was paid

to delivering high-quality
maternal health care.

And I thought about what that meant,
not just for myself

but for so many other women.

Maybe it’s because my dad
was a civil rights attorney

and my parents were socially conscious

and demanded that we stand up
for what we believe in.

Or the fact that my parents
were born in Jamaica,

came to the United States

and were able to realize
the American Dream.

Or maybe it was my residency training,

where I saw firsthand

how poorly so many low-income
women of color were treated

by our healthcare system.

For whatever the reason,
I felt a responsibility to stand up,

not just for myself,

but for all women,

and especially those marginalized
by our healthcare system.

And I decided to focus my career
on improving maternal health care.

So what’s killing mothers?

Cardiovascular disease, hemorrhage,

high blood pressure
causing seizures and strokes,

blood clots and infection

are some of the major causes
of maternal mortality in this country.

But a maternal death
is only the tip of the iceberg.

For every death, over a hundred women
suffer a severe complication

related to pregnancy and childbirth,

resulting in over 60,000 women every year
having one of these events.

These complications,
called severe maternal morbidity,

are on the rise in the United States,
and they’re life-altering.

It’s estimated that somewhere
between 1.5 and two percent

of the four million deliveries
that occur every year in this country

are associated with one of these events.

That is five or six women every hour
having a blood clot, a seizure, a stroke,

receiving a blood transfusion,

having end-organ damage
such as kidney failure,

or some other tragic event.

Now, the part of this story
that’s frankly unforgivable

is the fact that 60 percent
of these deaths and severe complications

are thought to be preventable.

When I say 60 percent are preventable,

I mean there are concrete steps
and standard procedures

that we could implement

that could prevent
these bad outcomes from occurring

and save women’s lives.

And it doesn’t require
fancy new technology.

We just have to apply what we know

and ensure equal standards
between hospitals.

For example, if a pregnant woman
in labor has really high blood pressure

and we treat her with the right
antihypertensive medication

in a timely fashion,

we can prevent stroke.

If we accurately track
blood loss during delivery,

we can detect a hemorrhage sooner
and save a woman’s life.

We could actually lower the rates
of these catastrophic events tomorrow,

but it requires that we value
the quality of care

we deliver to pregnant women

before, during and after pregnancy.

If we raise quality of care universally
to what is supposed to be the standard,

we could bring the rates of these deaths
and severe complications way down.

Well, there is some good news.

There are some success stories.

There are some places that have
actually adopted these standards,

and it’s really making a difference.

A few years ago, the American College
of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

joined forces with other
healthcare organizations,

researchers like myself
and community organizations.

They wanted to implement
standard care practices

in hospitals and health systems
throughout the country.

And the vehicle they’re using
is a program called

the Alliance for Innovation
in Maternal Health, the AIM program.

Their goal is to lower maternal mortality
and severe maternal morbidity rates

through quality and safety initiatives
across the country.

The group has developed
a number of safety bundles

that target some of the most
preventable causes of a maternal death.

The AIM program currently
has the potential to reach

over 50 percent of US births.

So what’s in a safety bundle?

Evidence-based practices,
protocols, procedures,

medications, equipment

and other items targeting
these conditions.

Let’s take the example
of a hemorrhage bundle.

For a hemorrhage, you need a cart

that has everything a doctor or nurse
might need in an emergency:

an IV line, an oxygen mask, medications,

checklists, other equipment.

Then you need something
to measure blood loss:

sponges and pads.

And instead of just eyeballing it,

the doctors and nurses
collect these sponges and pads

and either weigh them

or use newer technology to accurately
assess how much blood has been lost.

The hemorrhage bundle also includes
crises protocols for massive transfusions

and regular trainings and drills.

Now, California has been a leader
in the use of these types of bundles,

and that’s why California
saw a 21 percent reduction

in near death from hemorrhage

among hospitals that implemented
this bundle in the first year.

Yet the use of these bundles
across the country is spotty or missing.

Just like the fact that the use
of evidence-based practices

and the emphasis on safety

differs from one hospital to the next,

quality of care differs.

And quality of care differs greatly
for women of color in the United States.

Black women who deliver in this country

are three to four times more likely
to suffer a pregnancy-related death

than are white women.

This statistic is true for all black women
who deliver in this country,

whether they were born
in the United States

or born in another country.

Many want to think that income differences
drive these disparities,

but it goes beyond class.

A black woman with a college education

is nearly twice as likely to die
as compared to a white woman

with less than a high school education.

And she is two to three times more likely
to suffer a severe pregnancy complication

with her delivery.

Now, I was always taught to think
that education was our salvation,

but in this case, it’s simply not true.

This black-white disparity

is the largest disparity

among all population
perinatal health measures,

according to the CDC.

And these disparities
are even more pronounced

in some of our cities.

For example, in New York City,

a black woman is eight to 12 times
more likely to die

from a pregnancy-related cause
than is a white woman.

Now, I think many of you
are probably familiar with

the heart-wrenching story
of Dr. Shalon Irving,

a CDC epidemiologist
who died following childbirth.

Her story was reported
in ProPublica and NPR

a little less than a year ago.

Recently, I was at a conference

and I had the privilege
of hearing her mother speak.

She brought the entire audience to tears.

Shalon was a brilliant epidemiologist,

committed to studying
racial and ethnic disparities in health.

She was 36 years old,
this was her first baby,

and she was African-American.

Now, Shalon did have
a complicated pregnancy,

but she delivered a healthy baby girl
and was discharged from the hospital.

Three weeks later, she died
from complications of high blood pressure.

Shalon was seen four or five times
by healthcare professionals

in those three weeks.

She was not listened to,

and the severity of her condition
was not recognized.

Now, Shalon’s story
is just one of many stories

about racial and ethnic disparities
in health and health care

in the United States,

and there’s a growing recognition
that the social determinants of health,

such as racism, poverty, education,
segregated housing,

contribute to these disparities.

But Shalon’s story highlights
an additional underlying cause:

quality of care.

Lack of standards in postpartum care.

Shalon was seen multiple times
by clinicians in those three weeks,

and she still died.

Quality of care
in the setting of childbirth

is an underlying cause
of racial and ethnic disparities

in maternal mortality
and severe maternal morbidity

in the United States,

and it’s something we can address now.

Research by our team and others

has documented that,
for a variety of reasons,

black women tend to deliver
in a specific set of hospitals,

and those hospitals often have worse
outcomes for both black and white women,

regardless of patient risk factors.

This is true overall in the United States,

where about three quarters
of all black women

deliver in a specific set of hospitals,

while less than one-fifth of white women
deliver in those same hospitals.

In New York City, a woman’s risk
of having a life-threatening complication

during delivery

can be six times higher
in one hospital than another.

Not surprisingly, black women
are more likely to deliver

in hospitals with worse outcomes.

In fact, differences in delivery hospital

explain nearly one-half
of the black-white disparity.

While we must address
social determinants of health

if we’re ever going to truly have
equitable health care in this country,

many of these are deep-seated
and they will take some time to resolve.

In the meantime,
we can tackle quality of care.

Providing high-quality care
across the care continuum

means providing access to safe
and reliable contraception

throughout women’s reproductive lives.

Before pregnancy, it means
providing preconception care,

so we can manage chronic illness
and optimize health.

During pregnancy, it includes
high-quality prenatal and delivery care

so we can produce healthy moms and babies.

And finally, after pregnancy, it includes
postpartum and inter-pregnancy care

so we can set moms up
to have a healthy next baby

and a healthy life.

And it can literally spell the difference
between life and death,

as it did in the case of Maria,

who checked into the hospital
after having an elevated blood pressure

during a prenatal visit.

Maria was 40, and this
was her second pregnancy.

During Maria’s first pregnancy
that had happened two years earlier,

she also didn’t feel so well
in the last few weeks of her pregnancy,

and she had a few
elevated blood pressures,

but nobody seemed to pay attention.

They just said, “Maria,
don’t worry, you’ll be fine.

This is your first pregnancy.
You’re a little nervous.”

But it did not end well
for Maria last time.

She seized during labor.

Well, this time her team really listened.

They asked smart and probing questions.

Her doctor counseled her about
the signs and symptoms of preeclampsia

and explained that
if she was not feeling well,

she needed to come in and be seen.

And this time Maria came in,

and her doctor immediately
sent her to the hospital.

At the hospital, her doctor
ordered urgent lab tests.

They hooked her up
to multiple different monitors

and paid special attention
to her blood pressure,

the fetal heart rate tracing

and gave her IV medication
to prevent a seizure.

And when Maria’s blood pressure got
so high it put her at risk for a stroke,

her doctors and nurses jumped into action.

They repeated her
blood pressure in 15 minutes

and declared a hypertensive emergency.

They gave her the right IV medication
according to the latest correct protocol.

They worked smoothly together
as a coordinated team

and successfully
lowered her blood pressure.

As a result, what could have been
a tragedy became a success story.

Maria’s dangerous symptoms
were controlled,

and she delivered a healthy baby girl.

And before Maria was discharged
from the hospital,

her doctor counseled her again about
the signs and symptoms of preeclampsia,

the importance of having
her blood pressure checked,

especially in this first week postpartum

and gave her education about
postpartum health and what to expect.

And in the weeks and months that followed,

naturally, Maria had follow-up visits
with her pediatrician

to check in on her baby’s health.

But just as important,

she had follow-up visits with her ob-gyn

to check in on her health,
her blood pressure,

and her cares and concerns
as a new mother.

This is what high-quality care
across the care continuum looks like,

and this is how it can look.

If every pregnant woman in every community

received this kind of high-quality care

and delivered at facilities that utilized
standard care practices,

our maternal mortality and severe
maternal morbidity rates would plummet.

Our international ranking
would no longer be an embarrassment.

But the truth is, we’ve had decades
of unacceptably high rates

of maternal death and life-threatening
complications during delivery

and decades of devastating consequences
for moms, babies and families,

and we have not been moved to action.

The recent media attention on
our poor performance on maternal mortality

has helped the public to understand:

high-quality maternal health care
is within reach.

The question is:

Are we as a society ready to value
pregnant women from every community?

For my part, I’m doing everything I can
to ensure that when we do,

we have the tools and evidence base ready

to move forward.

Thank you.

(Applause)

下电梯时一片混乱。


作为住院医师

回来工作,负责分娩和分娩单位。

我所能看到的只是
一群医生和护士

在产房里盘旋在一个病人身上。

他们都拼命
想挽救一个女人的生命。

病人处于休克状态。

在我到达前几个小时,她生下了一个健康的男婴。

突然,她倒下了,
变得没有反应,

并且子宫大出血。

我到病房时,

已经有好几位医生和护士了
,病人已经死了。

复苏小组
试图让她起死回生,

但尽管大家尽了最大的努力,

她还是死了。

那天我记忆最深的
是父亲刺耳的哭声。

它穿过了我
的心和那层楼上每个人的心。

这本应该
是他一生中最快乐的一天,结果

却是最糟糕的一天。

我希望我可以说这场悲剧
是一个孤立的事件,

但遗憾的是,事实并非如此。

在美国,

每年大约有 700 至 900 名妇女死于

与怀孕有关的原因。

这个故事令人震惊的部分

是,我们的孕产妇死亡
率实际上

高于所有其他高收入国家,

而有色人种女性的死亡率要低得多

在过去十年中,我们的孕产妇死亡率实际上有所上升,

而其他国家则降低了死亡率。

最大的悖论是什么?

我们在医疗保健上的花费
比世界上任何其他国家都多。

好吧,大约在
这位新妈妈失去生命的住院期间,

我自己也成为了一名母亲。

即使拥有
该领域的所有背景和培训,

对提供高质量
孕产妇保健服务的关注度之低感到震惊。

我想到了这意味着什么,
不仅对我自己

,对许多其他女性。

也许是因为我父亲
是一名民权律师,

而我的父母具有社会意识,

并要求我们
坚持我们的信仰。

或者我
父母出生在牙买加,

来到美国

并能够
意识到 美国梦。

或者也许是我的住院医师培训,

在那里我亲眼目睹

了这么多低收入
的有色人种女性在

我们的医疗保健系统中受到的待遇有多差。

无论出于何种原因,
我都感到有责任站起来,

不仅是为了我自己,

也是为了所有女性

,尤其是那些
被我们的医疗保健系统边缘化的女性。

我决定将我的职业生涯重点
放在改善孕产妇保健上。

那么是什么杀死了母亲?

心血管疾病、出血、

导致癫痫发作和中风的

高血压、血栓和感染


该国孕产妇死亡的一些主要原因。

但孕产妇死亡
只是冰山一角。

每发生一次死亡,就有超过 100 名妇女
遭受

与怀孕和分娩有关的严重并发症,

导致每年有超过 60,000 名妇女
发生此类事件。

这些并发症,
称为严重的孕产妇发病率

,在美国呈上升趋势
,它们正在改变生活。

据估计,

在这个国家每年发生的 400 万次交付中,

有 1.5% 到 2% 与这些事件之一有关。

也就是说,每小时有五六名妇女
出现血栓、癫痫发作、中风、

接受输血

、肾衰竭等终末器官损伤

或其他一些悲惨事件。

现在,
坦率地说,这个故事中不可原谅的部分


,这些死亡和严重并发症中

有 60% 被认为是可以预防的。

当我说 60% 是可以预防的时,

我的意思是我们可以实施具体的步骤
和标准程序

,以防止
这些不良后果的发生

并挽救妇女的生命。

而且它不需要
花哨的新技术。

我们只需要应用我们所知道的

并确保
医院之间的平等标准。

比如
临产的孕妇血压真的很高

,我们及时给她正确的
降压药治疗

就可以预防中风。

如果我们准确跟踪
分娩过程中的失血量,

我们可以更快地发现出血
并挽救妇女的生命。

实际上,我们
明天可以降低这些灾难性事件的发生率,

但这需要我们
重视在

怀孕

之前、期间和之后为孕妇提供的护理质量。

如果我们普遍将护理质量提高
到应有的标准,

我们可以降低这些死亡率
和严重并发症的发生率。

嗯,有一些好消息。

有一些成功的故事。

有些地方
实际上已经采用了这些标准,

而且确实有所作为。

几年前,美国
妇产科学院

与其他
医疗保健组织、

像我这样的研究人员
和社区组织联手。

他们希望

在全国的医院和卫生系统
中实施标准护理实践。

他们使用的工具
是一个

名为“
孕产妇健康创新联盟”的项目,即 AIM 项目。

他们的目标是通过全国各地的质量和安全举措降低孕产妇死亡率
和严重孕产妇发病率

该小组制定
了许多

针对
孕产妇死亡的一些最可预防的原因的安全包。

AIM 计划目前
有可能

覆盖 50% 以上的美国出生人口。

那么安全包里有什么? 针对这些情况的

循证实践、
协议、程序、

药物、设备

和其他项目

让我们
以出血束为例。

对于出血,您需要一辆

装有医生或护士
在紧急情况下可能需要的一切的推车

:静脉输液管、氧气面罩、药物、

检查单和其他设备。

然后你需要一些东西
来测量失血量:

海绵和垫子。 医生

和护士不只是目测,而是

收集这些海绵和垫子,

然后称重

或使用更新的技术来准确
评估失血量。

出血包还包括
大量输血

和定期培训和演习的危机协议。

现在,加利福尼亚州
在使用这些类型的捆绑包方面一直处于领先地位

,这就是为什么加利福尼亚州

在第一年实施这种捆绑包的医院中因出血而濒临死亡的人数减少了 21%。

然而,这些捆绑包
在全国范围内的使用参差不齐或缺失。

正如
循证实践的使用

和对安全的重视程度

因医院而异

,护理质量也不同。

美国有色女性的护理质量差异
很大。

在这个国家分娩的黑人妇女

因怀孕而死亡的

可能性是白人妇女的三到四倍。

这一统计数据适用于
在这个国家分娩的所有黑人女性,

无论她们是
在美国

出生还是在另一个国家出生。

许多人想认为收入差异导致了
这些差异,

但它超越了阶级。

与未受过高中教育的白人女性相比,受过大学教育的黑人女性

死亡的可能性几乎是后者的两倍

她在
分娩时出现严重妊娠并发症的可能性要高出两到三倍

现在,我总是被教导
认为教育是我们的救赎,

但在这种情况下,这根本不是真的。 根据疾病预防控制中心的数据,

这种黑白差异

是所有人群
围产期健康措施中最大的差异

这些差异

在我们的一些城市中更加明显。

例如,在纽约市

,黑人女性

死于妊娠相关原因的
可能性是白人女性的 8 到 12 倍。

现在,我想你们
中的许多人可能都熟悉

CDC 流行病学
家 Shalon Irving 博士在分娩后死亡的令人心碎的故事。 不到一年前

,ProPublica 和 NPR 报道了她的故事

最近,我在一个会议上

,我
有幸听到她母亲的讲话。

她让全场观众落泪。

沙龙是一位杰出的流行病学家,

致力于研究
健康方面的种族和民族差异。

她 36 岁,
这是她的第一个孩子

,她是非裔美国人。

现在,Shalon 确实有
一个复杂的怀孕,

但她生下了一个健康的女婴
,并出院了。

三周后,她
死于高血压并发症。 在这三周内,医疗保健

专业人员看过沙龙四五次

她没有被倾听,

她的病情的严重性
也没有得到承认。

现在,沙龙的故事
只是美国

健康和医疗保健方面种族和民族差异的众多故事

之一

,人们越来越认识
到,健康的社会决定因素,

如种族主义、贫困、教育、
隔离住房,

有助于 这些差距。

但沙龙的故事突出
了另一个根本原因:

护理质量。

产后护理缺乏标准。

在那三周里,临床医生多次看到沙龙,

她仍然死了。

分娩环境中的护理质量

是导致美国

孕产妇死亡率和严重孕产妇发病率存在种族和民族差异的根本原因

,这是我们现在可以解决的问题。

我们团队和其他人的

研究表明,
由于各种原因,

黑人女性倾向于
在特定的医院分娩,

而这些医院通常
对黑人和白人女性的结果都较差,

无论患者的风险因素如何。

这在美国总体上是正确的

,大约四分之三
的黑人女性

在特定的医院分娩,

而只有不到五分之一的白人女性
在这些医院分娩。

在纽约市,女性

在分娩

过程中出现危及生命的并发症的风险
在一家医院可能是另一家医院的六倍。

毫不奇怪,黑人女性
更有可能

在结果更差的医院分娩。

事实上,分娩医院的差异

解释了近一半
的黑白差异。

如果我们要
在这个国家真正拥有公平的医疗保健,我们必须解决健康的社会决定因素,但

其中许多是根深蒂固的
,需要一些时间来解决。

与此同时,
我们可以解决护理质量问题。

在整个护理过程中提供高质量的护理

意味着

在女性的整个生育过程中提供安全可靠的避孕措施。

在怀孕之前,这意味着
提供孕前护理,

这样我们就可以管理慢性病
并优化健康。

在怀孕期间,它包括
高质量的产前和分娩护理,

因此我们可以生产出健康的妈妈和宝宝。

最后,在怀孕后,它包括
产后和孕期护理,

这样我们就可以让妈妈
们有一个健康的下一个孩子

和健康的生活。

它可以从字面上解释
生与死之间的差异,

就像玛丽亚的情况一样,

在产前检查期间血压升高后进入医院。

玛丽亚 40 岁,这
是她第二次怀孕。

玛丽亚两年前第一次
怀孕期间,

她在怀孕的最后几周也感觉不太好

,她的血压也有一些
升高,

但似乎没有人注意。

他们只是说:“玛丽亚
,别担心,你会没事的。

这是你第一次怀孕,
你有点紧张。”


上次玛丽亚的结局并不好。

她在分娩时抓住了。

好吧,这次她的团队真的听了。

他们提出了聪明而富有探索性的问题。

她的医生向她咨询
了先兆子痫的症状和体征,

并解释说
如果她感觉不舒服,

就需要进来看看。

而这次玛丽亚进来了

,她的医生立即
将她送到了医院。

在医院,她的医生
要求进行紧急实验室检查。

他们将她连接
到多个不同的监视器上,

并特别
注意她的血压

、胎心追踪,

并给她静脉注射药物
以防止癫痫发作。

当玛丽亚的血压
如此之高,使她面临中风的风险时,

她的医生和护士立即采取了行动。

他们
在 15 分钟内

复查了她的血压,并宣布她患有高血压急症。

他们根据最新的正确方案给了她正确的静脉注射药物

他们
作为一个协调的团队合作顺利

,成功地
降低了她的血压。

结果,本来可能
是悲剧的故事变成了成功的故事。

玛丽亚的危险症状
得到控制

,她生下了一个健康的女婴。

在玛丽亚出院之前

她的医生再次向她咨询
了先兆子痫的症状和体征,

检查血压的重要性,

尤其是在产后的第一周

,并对她进行了
产后健康和预期结果的教育。

在接下来的几周和几个月里

,玛丽亚自然而然地
与她的儿科医生

进行了后续访问,以检查她宝宝的健康状况。

但同样重要的是,

她与她的妇产科医生进行了后续访问,

以检查她的健康状况、
血压

以及作为新妈妈的关心和担忧。

这就是
整个护理过程中高质量护理的样子

,也是它的样子。

如果每个社区的每个孕妇都

接受这种高质量的护理

,并在使用
标准护理实践的设施中

分娩,我们的孕产妇死亡率和严重
孕产妇发病率将直线下降。

我们的国际排名
将不再令人尴尬。

但事实是,我们已经经历了数十年
令人无法接受的高

产妇死亡率和
分娩过程中危及生命的并发症,

以及数十年
对妈妈、婴儿和家庭造成的毁灭性后果

,我们还没有采取行动。

最近媒体对
我们在孕产妇死亡率方面表现不佳的关注

帮助公众理解:

高质量的孕产妇保健
是触手可及的。

问题是:

作为一个社会,我们是否准备好重视
来自每个社区的孕妇?

就我而言,我正在尽我
所能确保当我们这样做时,

我们有准备好前进的工具和证据基础

谢谢你。

(掌声)