A brief history of cannibalism Bill Schutt

15th century Europeans believed
they had hit upon a miracle cure:

a remedy for epilepsy, hemorrhage,
bruising, nausea,

and virtually any other
medical ailment.

This brown powder could be mixed
into drinks, made into salves

or eaten straight up.

It was known as mumia and made
by grinding up mummified human flesh.

The word “cannibal” dates from the
time of Christopher Columbus;

in fact, Columbus may even have
coined it himself.

After coming ashore on the
island of Guadaloupe,

Columbus' initial reports back
to the Queen of Spain

described the indigenous people as
friendly and peaceful—

though he did mention rumors of a
group called the Caribs,

who made violent raids and then cooked
and ate their prisoners.

In response, Queen Isabella granted
permission to capture and enslave

anyone who ate human flesh.

When the island failed to produce the gold
Columbus was looking for,

he began to label anyone who resisted his
plundering and kidnapping as a Caribe.

Somewhere along the way, the word “Carib”
became “Canibe” and then “Cannibal.”

First used by colonizers to dehumanize
indigenous people,

it has since been applied to anyone
who eats human flesh.

So the term comes from an account that
wasn’t based on hard evidence,

but cannibalism does have a real and
much more complex history.

It has taken diverse forms— sometimes,
as with mumia,

it doesn’t involved recognizable parts
of the human body.

The reasons for cannibalistic practices
have varied, too.

Across cultures and time periods, there’s
evidence of survival cannibalism,

when people living through a famine,
siege or ill-fated expedition

had to either eat the bodies of the dead
or starve to death themselves.

But it’s also been quite common
for cultures

to normalize some form of eating human
flesh under ordinary circumstances.

Because of false accounts
like Columbus’s,

it’s difficult to say exactly how common
cultural cannibalism has been—

but there are still some examples of
accepted cannibalistic practices

from within the cultures practicing them.

Take the medicinal cannibalism in Europe
during Columbus’s time.

Starting in the 15th century, the demand
for mumia increased.

At first, stolen mummies from Egypt
supplied the mumia craze,

but soon the demand was too great to be
sustained on Egyptian mummies alone,

and opportunists stole bodies from
European cemeteries to turn into mumia.

Use of mumia continued for
hundreds of years.

It was listed in the Merck index,
a popular medical encyclopedia,

into the 20th century.

And ground up mummies were far from
the only remedy made from human flesh

that was common throughout Europe.

Blood, in either liquid or powdered form,
was used to treat epilepsy,

while human liver, gall stones, oil
distilled from human brains,

and pulverized hearts were popular
medical concoctions.

In China,

the written record of socially accepted
cannibalism goes back almost 2,000 years.

One particularly common
form of cannibalism

appears to have been filial cannibalism,

where adult sons and daughters would
offer a piece of their own flesh

to their parents.

This was typically offered as a last-ditch
attempt to cure a sick parent,

and wasn’t fatal to their offspring—

it usually involved flesh from the thigh
or, less often, a finger.

Cannibalistic funerary rites are another
form of culturally sanctioned cannibalism.

Perhaps the best-known example came
from the Fore people of New Guinea.

Through the mid-20th century, members
of the community would,

if possible, make their funerary
preferences known in advance,

sometimes requesting that family members
gather to consume the body after death.

Tragically, though these rituals
honored the deceased,

they also spread a deadly disease known
as kuru through the community.

Between the fictionalized stories,
verifiable practices,

and big gaps that still exist
in our knowledge,

there’s no one history of cannibalism.

But we do know that people have
been eating each other,

volunteering themselves to be eaten,

and accusing others of eating
people for millennia.

15 世纪的欧洲人相信
他们已经找到了一种灵丹妙药

:治疗癫痫、出血、
瘀伤、恶心

和几乎所有其他
疾病的药物。

这种棕色粉末可以
混入饮料中,制成药膏

或直接食用。

它被称为木乃伊,是
通过研磨木乃伊制成的人肉制成的。

“食人族”这个词可以
追溯到克里斯托弗·哥伦布的时代;

事实上,哥伦布甚至可能
自己创造了它。

在瓜达罗普岛上岸后

哥伦布向西班牙女王提交的初步报告

称土著人民
友好而和平——

尽管他确实提到了
一个名为加勒比人的组织的传言,

他们进行猛烈袭击,然后煮熟
并吃掉他们的食物。 囚犯。

作为回应,伊莎贝拉女王
准许俘虏并奴役

任何吃人肉的人。

当该岛未能生产出
哥伦布正在寻找的黄金时,

他开始将任何抵制他的
掠夺和绑架的人贴上加勒比人的标签。

一路走来,“加勒比人”这个词
变成了“Canibe”,然后是“Cannibal”。

殖民者首先使用它来非人化
土著人,

后来它被应用于
任何吃人肉的人。

因此,该术语来自一个
并非基于确凿证据的帐户,

但同类相食确实有一段真实且
复杂得多的历史。

它采取了多种形式——有时,
就像 mumia 一样,

它不涉及
人体可识别的部分。

食人行为的原因
也多种多样。

跨越文化和时代,
存在自相残杀的证据,

当人们经历饥荒、
围困或命运多舛的探险

时,要么吃掉死者的尸体,
要么自己饿死。

但是,在普通情况下
,文化

将某种形式的吃人肉正常化也很常见

由于
像哥伦布这样的虚假记载,

很难准确地说出自相残杀的文化到底有多普遍——

但在实践它们的文化中,仍有一些
公认的自相残杀行为

的例子。

以哥伦布时代欧洲的药用同类相食为例

从 15 世纪开始,
对木乃伊的需求增加。

起初,从埃及偷来的木乃伊
提供了木乃伊热潮,

但很快需求就太大了,
仅靠埃及木乃伊就无法维持

,机会主义者从欧洲墓地偷走了尸体
,将其变成木乃伊。

mumia 的使用持续了
数百年。 进入 20 世纪,

它被列入
流行的医学百科全书默克指数

碾碎的木乃伊远不是整个欧洲常见
的唯一由人肉制成的补救措施

液体或粉末形式的血液
用于治疗癫痫,

而人类肝脏、胆结石、
从人脑中蒸馏的油

和粉碎的心脏是流行的
医学混合物。

在中国,

被社会接受的
食人现象的书面记录可以追溯到近 2000 年前。

一种特别常见
的自相残杀形式

似乎是孝顺的自相残杀

,成年的儿子和女儿
会将自己的一块肉

献给父母。

这通常是作为
治愈生病父母的最后尝试提供的,

对他们的后代来说并不是致命的——

它通常涉及大腿上的肉
,或者更少见的是手指。

食人葬礼是另
一种文化认可的食人行为。

也许最著名的例子
来自新几内亚的福尔人。

到了 20 世纪中叶,

如果可能的话,社区成员会提前公布他们的葬礼
偏好,

有时会要求家人
在死后聚集在一起食用尸体。

可悲的是,尽管这些仪式是为了
纪念死者,

但它们也在社区中传播了一种被称为库鲁的致命疾病

在虚构的故事、
可验证的做法

和我们知识中仍然存在的巨大差距之间,

没有任何自相残杀的历史。

但我们确实知道,几千年来人们
一直在互相吃东西,

自愿被吃掉,

并指责别人吃
人。