Noy Thrupkaew Human trafficking is all around you. This is how it works

About 10 years ago, I went through
a little bit of a hard time.

So I decided to go see a therapist.

I had been seeing her for a few months,
when she looked at me one day and said,

“Who actually raised you
until you were three?”

Seemed like a weird question.
I said, “My parents.”

And she said, “I don’t think
that’s actually the case;

because if it were,

we’d be dealing with things that are
far more complicated than just this.”

It sounded like the setup to a joke,
but I knew she was serious.

Because when I first started seeing her,

I was trying to be
the funniest person in the room.

And I would try and crack these jokes,
but she caught on to me really quickly,

and whenever I tried to make a joke,
she would look at me and say,

“That is actually really sad.”

(Laughter)

It’s terrible.

So I knew I had to be serious,
and I asked my parents

who had actually raised me
until I was three?

And to my surprise, they said

my primary caregiver had been
a distant relative of the family.

I had called her my auntie.

I remember my auntie so clearly,

it felt like she had been part of my life
when I was much older.

I remember the thick, straight hair,

and how it would come around
me like a curtain

when she bent to pick me up;

her soft, southern Thai accent;

the way I would cling to her,

even if she just wanted to go
to the bathroom

or get something to eat.

I loved her, but [with] the ferocity
that a child has sometimes

before she understands that love
also requires letting go.

But my clearest and sharpest
memory of my auntie,

is also one of my first
memories of life at all.

I remember her being beaten and slapped
by another member of my family.

I remember screaming hysterically
and wanting it to stop,

as I did every single time it happened,

for things as minor as wanting
to go out with her friends,

or being a little late.

I became so hysterical over her treatment,

that eventually, she was just
beaten behind closed doors.

Things got so bad for her
that eventually she ran away.

As an adult, I learned later

that she had been just 19
when she was brought over from Thailand

to the States to care for me,
on a tourist visa.

She wound up working
in Illinois for a time,

before eventually returning to Thailand,

which is where I ran into her again,
at a political rally in Bangkok.

I clung to her again, as I had
when I was a child,

and I let go, and then
I promised that I would call.

I never did, though.

Because I was afraid if I said
everything that she meant to me –

that I owed perhaps the best parts
of who I became to her care,

and that the words “I’m sorry”
were like a thimble

to bail out all the guilt
and shame and rage I felt

over everything she had endured
to care for me for as long as she had –

I thought if I said those words to her,
I would never stop crying again.

Because she had saved me.

And I had not saved her.

I’m a journalist, and I’ve been writing
and researching human trafficking

for the past eight years or so,

and even so, I never put together
this personal story

with my professional life
until pretty recently.

I think this profound disconnect
actually symbolizes

most of our understanding
about human trafficking.

Because human trafficking is far more
prevalent, complex and close to home

than most of us realize.

I spent time in jails and brothels,

interviewed hundreds of survivors
and law enforcement, NGO workers.

And when I think about what we’ve done
about human trafficking,

I am hugely disappointed.

Partly because we don’t even talk
about the problem right at all.

When I say “human trafficking,”

most of you probably don’t think
about someone like my auntie.

You probably think
about a young girl or woman,

who’s been brutally forced
into prostitution by a violent pimp.

That is real suffering,
and that is a real story.

That story makes me angry

for far more than just the reality
of that situation, though.

As a journalist, I really care about how
we relate to each other through language,

and the way we tell that story,
with all the gory, violent detail,

the salacious aspects – I call that
“look at her scars” journalism.

We use that story to convince ourselves

that human trafficking is a bad man
doing a bad thing to an innocent girl.

That story lets us off the hook.

It takes away all the societal context
that we might be indicted for,

for the structural inequality,
or the poverty,

or the barriers to migration.

We let ourselves think

that human trafficking is only
about forced prostitution,

when in reality,

human trafficking is embedded
in our everyday lives.

Let me show you what I mean.

Forced prostitution accounts for
22 percent of human trafficking.

Ten percent is in state-
imposed forced labor.

but a whopping 68 percent
is for the purpose of creating the goods

and delivering the services
that most of us rely on every day,

in sectors like agricultural work,
domestic work and construction.

That is food and care and shelter.

And somehow, these most essential workers

are also among the world’s most underpaid
and exploited today.

Human trafficking is the use
of force, fraud or coercion

to compel another person’s labor.

And it’s found in cotton fields,
and coltan mines,

and even car washes in Norway and England.

It’s found in U.S. military
bases in Iraq and Afghanistan.

It’s found in Thailand’s fishing industry.

That country has become the largest
exporter of shrimp in the world.

But what are the circumstances

behind all that cheap
and plentiful shrimp?

Thai military were caught selling
Burmese and Cambodian migrants

onto fishing boats.

Those fishing boats were taken out,
the men put to work,

and they were thrown overboard
if they made the mistake of falling sick,

or trying to resist their treatment.

Those fish were then used to feed shrimp,

The shrimp were then sold
to four major global retailers:

Costco, Tesco, Walmart and Carrefour.

Human trafficking is found
on a smaller scale than just that,

and in places you would
never even imagine.

Traffickers have forced young people
to drive ice cream trucks,

or to sing in touring boys' choirs.

Trafficking has even been found
in a hair braiding salon in New Jersey.

The scheme in that case was incredible.

The traffickers found young families
who were from Ghana and Togo,

and they told these families that
“your daughters are going to get

a fine education in the United States.”

They then located winners
of the green card lottery,

and they told them, “We’ll help you out.

We’ll get you a plane ticket.
We’ll pay your fees.

All you have to do is take
this young girl with you,

say that she’s your sister or your spouse.

Once everyone arrived in New Jersey,
the young girls were taken away,

and put to work for 14-hour days,

seven days a week, for five years.

They made their traffickers
nearly four million dollars.

This is a huge problem.

So what have we done about it?

We’ve mostly turned
to the criminal justice system.

But keep in mind, most victims of human
trafficking are poor and marginalized.

They’re migrants, people of color.

Sometimes they’re in the sex trade.

And for populations like these,

the criminal justice system is
too often part of the problem,

rather than the solution.

In study after study, in countries ranging
from Bangladesh to the United States,

between 20 and 60 percent of the people
in the sex trade who were surveyed

said that they had been raped or assaulted
by the police in the past year alone.

People in prostitution, including people
who have been trafficked into it,

regularly receive multiple
convictions for prostitution.

Having that criminal record makes it
so much more difficult

to leave poverty, leave abuse,
or leave prostitution,

if that person so desires.

Workers outside of the sex sector –

if they try and resist their treatment,
they risk deportation.

In case after case I’ve studied,
employers have no problem

calling on law enforcement
to try and threaten or deport

their striking trafficked workers.

If those workers run away,

they risk becoming part of the great mass
of undocumented workers

who are also subject to the whims
of law enforcement if they’re caught.

Law enforcement is supposed to identify
victims and prosecute traffickers.

But out of an estimated 21 million victims
of human trafficking in the world,

they have helped and identified
fewer than 50,000 people.

That’s like comparing

the population of the world
to the population of Los Angeles,

proportionally speaking.

As for convictions, out of an estimated
5,700 convictions in 2013,

fewer than 500 were for labor trafficking.

Keep in mind that labor trafficking

accounts for 68 percent
of all trafficking,

but fewer than 10 percent
of the convictions.

I’ve heard one expert say that trafficking
happens where need meets greed.

I’d like to add one more element to that.

Trafficking happens in sectors where
workers are excluded from protections,

and denied the right to organize.

Trafficking doesn’t happen in a vacuum.

It happens in systematically
degraded work environments.

You might be thinking,

oh, she’s talking about failed states,
or war-torn states, or –

I’m actually talking
about the United States.

Let me tell you what that looks like.

I spent many months researching
a trafficking case called Global Horizons,

involving hundreds of Thai farm workers.

They were sent all over the States,
to work in Hawaii pineapple plantations,

and Washington apple orchards,
and anywhere the work was needed.

They were promised three years
of solid agricultural work.

So they made a calculated risk.

They sold their land, they sold
their wives' jewelry,

to make thousands in recruitment fees
for this company, Global Horizons.

But once they were brought over,

their passports were confiscated.

Some of the men were beaten
and held at gunpoint.

They worked so hard
they fainted in the fields.

This case hit me so hard.

After I came back home,

I was wandering through the grocery store,
and I froze in the produce department.

I was remembering the over-the-top meals
the Global Horizons survivors

would make for me every time
I showed up to interview them.

They finished one meal with this plate
of perfect, long-stemmed strawberries,

and as they handed them to me, they said,

“Aren’t these the kind of strawberries
you eat with somebody special

in the States?

And don’t they taste so much better

when you know the people
whose hands picked them for you?”

As I stood in that grocery store weeks
later, I realized I had no idea

of who to thank for this plenty,

and no idea of how
they were being treated.

So, like the journalist I am, I started
digging into the agricultural sector.

And I found there are too many fields,
and too few labor inspectors.

I found multiple layers
of plausible deniability

between grower and distributor
and processor, and God knows who else.

The Global Horizons survivors had been
brought to the States

on a temporary guest worker program.

That guest worker program
ties a person’s legal status

to his or her employer,

and denies that worker
the right to organize.

Mind you, none of what I am describing
about this agricultural sector

or the guest worker program
is actually human trafficking.

It is merely what we find
legally tolerable.

And I would argue this is
fertile ground for exploitation.

And all of this had been hidden to me,
before I had tried to understand it.

I wasn’t the only person
grappling with these issues.

Pierre Omidyar, founder of eBay,

is one of the biggest anti-trafficking
philanthropists in the world.

And even he wound up accidentally
investing nearly 10 million dollars

in the pineapple plantation cited
as having the worst working conditions

in that Global Horizons case.

When he found out, he and his wife
were shocked and horrified,

and they wound up writing
an op-ed for a newspaper,

saying that it was up to all of us
to learn everything we can

about the labor and supply chains
of the products that we support.

I totally agree.

What would happen
if each one of us decided

that we are no longer going
to support companies

if they don’t eliminate exploitation
from their labor and supply chains?

If we demanded laws calling for the same?

If all the CEOs out there decided

that they were going to go through
their businesses and say, “no more”?

If we ended recruitment fees
for migrant workers?

If we decided that guest workers
should have the right to organize

without fear of retaliation?

These would be decisions heard
around the world.

This isn’t a matter of buying
a fair-trade peach

and calling it a day, buying
a guilt-free zone with your money.

That’s not how it works.

This is the decision to change
a system that is broken,

and that we have unwittingly but willingly

allowed ourselves to profit from
and benefit from for too long.

We often dwell on human trafficking
survivors' victimization.

But that is not my experience of them.

Over all the years that I’ve
been talking to them,

they have taught me that we are
more than our worst days.

Each one of us is more
than what we have lived through.

Especially trafficking survivors.

These people were the most resourceful
and resilient and responsible

in their communities.

They were the people that you
would take a gamble on.

You’d say, I’m gong to sell my rings,
because I have the chance

to send you off to a better future.

They were the emissaries of hope.

These survivors don’t need saving.

They need solidarity,
because they’re behind

some of the most exciting
social justice movements out there today.

The nannies and housekeepers
who marched with their families

and their employers' families –

their activism got us
an international treaty

on domestic workers' rights.

The Nepali women who were trafficked
into the sex trade –

they came together, and they decided

that they were going to make the world’s
first anti-trafficking organization

actually headed and run
by trafficking survivors themselves.

These Indian shipyard workers
were trafficked

to do post-Hurricane Katrina
reconstruction.

They were threatened with deportation,
but they broke out of their work compound

and they marched from New Orleans
to Washington, D.C.,

to protest labor exploitation.

They cofounded an organization called
the National Guest Worker Alliance,

and through this organization,
they have wound up helping other workers

bring to light exploitation
and abuses in supply chains

in Walmart and Hershey’s factories.

And although the Department
of Justice declined to take their case,

a team of civil rights lawyers won
the first of a dozen civil suits

this February, and got
their clients 14 million dollars.

These survivors are fighting
for people they don’t even know yet,

other workers, and for the possibility
of a just world for all of us.

This is our chance to do the same.

This is our chance to make the decision

that tells us who we are,
as a people and as a society;

that our prosperity is no
longer prosperity,

as long as it is pinned
to other people’s pain;

that our lives are
inextricably woven together;

and that we have the power
to make a different choice.

I was so reluctant to share
my story of my auntie with you.

Before I started this TED process
and climbed up on this stage,

I had told literally a handful
of people about it,

because, like many a journalist,

I am far more interested in learning
about your stories

than sharing much,
if anything, about my own.

I also haven’t done my journalistic
due diligence on this.

I haven’t issued my mountains
of document requests,

and interviewed everyone and their mother,

and I haven’t found my auntie yet.

I don’t know her story
of what happened, and of her life now.

The story as I’ve told it to you
is messy and unfinished.

But I think it mirrors the messy
and unfinished situation we’re all in,

when it comes to human trafficking.

We are all implicated in this problem.

But that means we are all
also part of its solution.

Figuring out how to build a more
just world is our work to do,

and our story to tell.

So let us tell it the way
we should have done,

from the very beginning.

Let us tell this story together.

Thank you so much.

(Applause)

大约 10 年前,我经历
了一段艰难的时期。

所以我决定去看治疗师。

我已经见到她几个月了,
有一天她看着我说:

“到底是谁把你养大
到三岁的?”

似乎是一个奇怪的问题。
我说:“我的父母。”

她说,“我
认为事实并非如此;

因为如果是这样,

我们将处理的事情
远比这复杂得多。”

这听起来像是开个玩笑,
但我知道她是认真的。

因为当我第一次见到她时,

我想成为
房间里最有趣的人。

我会试着开这些玩笑,
但她很快就抓住了我

,每当我想开个玩笑时,
她都会看着我说,

“那真的很伤心。”

(笑声

) 太可怕了。

所以我知道我必须认真
,我问我的父母是

谁把我养大
到我三岁?

令我惊讶的是,他们说

我的主要照顾者
是这个家庭的远亲。

我曾称她为我的阿姨。

我记得很清楚我的阿姨,

感觉就像她在我长大的时候就已经成为我生活的一部分

我记得浓密的直发,当她弯下腰来接我时,

它是如何像窗帘一样围绕着

她柔和的泰国南部口音;

即使她只是
想去洗手间

或吃点东西,我也会依偎着她。

我爱她,但 [with]
孩子有时

在她理解爱之前所具有的凶猛,
也需要放手。

但我对阿姨最清晰、最清晰的
记忆,

也是我
人生最初的记忆之一。

我记得她被
我的另一个家庭成员殴打和扇耳光。

我记得歇斯底里地尖叫
并希望它停止,

就像我每次发生它时所做的那样

,因为小到
想和她的朋友出去,

或者有点迟到。

我对她的治疗变得如此歇斯底里

,最终,她只是
被关起门来殴打。

事情变得如此糟糕,以至于
她最终逃跑了。

作为一个成年人,我后来才

知道,
当她持旅游签证从泰国带到美国照顾我时,她才 19 岁


在伊利诺伊州工作了一段时间,

最后回到泰国

,我
在曼谷的一次政治集会上再次遇到她。

我再次紧紧抓住她,就像
我小时候一样

,我放开了,然后
我答应我会打电话。

不过,我从来没有这样做过。

因为我害怕如果我说出
她对我来说意味着的一切

——我可能
欠她照顾我成为的最好的部分,

而“对不起”这句话
就像一个顶针

来拯救所有的内疚

我为她为照顾我而忍受的一切感到羞愧和愤怒——

我想如果我对她说这些话,
我就再也不会停止哭泣了。

因为她救了我。

而我也没有救过她。

我是一名记者,在过去八年左右的时间里,我一直在撰写
和研究人口贩运问题

,即便如此,直到最近,我才将
这个个人故事

与我的职业生活结合起来

我认为这种深刻的脱节
实际上象征

着我们
对人口贩运的大部分理解。

因为人口贩卖比我们大多数人意识到的
要普遍、复杂和离家更近

我在监狱和妓院呆过,

采访了数百名幸存者
和执法人员、非政府组织工作人员。

当我想到我们对人口贩运所做的事情时

我感到非常失望。

部分原因是我们甚至根本不
谈论这个问题。

当我说“人口贩卖”时

,你们中的大多数人可能不会
想到像我阿姨这样的人。

你可能会
想到一个年轻的女孩或女人,

她被暴力皮条客残忍地强迫
卖淫。

那是真正的苦难
,那是一个真实的故事。

不过,这个故事让我感到愤怒

的不仅仅是
那种情况的现实。

作为一名记者,我真的很关心
我们如何通过语言相互联系,

以及我们讲述这个故事的方式,
以及所有血腥、暴力的细节

和色情的方面——我称之为
“看看她的伤疤”新闻。

我们用这个故事来说服自己

,贩卖人口是一个坏人,
对一个无辜的女孩做坏事。

这个故事让我们摆脱了困境。

它消除
了我们可能

因结构性不平等、
贫困

或移民障碍而被起诉的所有社会背景。

我们让自己

认为人口贩运
只是强迫卖淫,

而实际上,

人口贩运已
融入我们的日常生活。

让我告诉你我的意思。

强迫卖淫占
人口贩运的 22%。

百分之十是国家
强制劳动。

但高达 68
% 的目的是创造商品

和提供
我们大多数人每天所依赖

的服务,例如农业工作、
家政工作和建筑行业。

那就是食物、护理和住所。

不知何故,这些最重要的工人

也是当今世界上薪酬最低
、受剥削程度最低的工人之一。

人口贩运是
使用武力、欺诈或胁迫

手段强迫他人劳动。

它存在于棉田
、钶钽铁矿,

甚至挪威和英国的洗车场。

它存在
于伊拉克和阿富汗的美国军事基地。

它存在于泰国的渔业中。

该国已成为世界上最大
的虾出口国。

但是

,这么多便宜
又丰富的虾背后的情况是什么?

泰国军方被抓获将
缅甸和柬埔寨移民卖到

渔船上。

那些渔船被拿出来
,男人们开始工作,

如果他们犯了生病的错误,

或者试图抵抗他们的治疗,他们就会被扔到海里。

然后这些鱼被用来喂虾,

然后这些虾被卖给
了四大全球零售商:

好市多、乐购、沃尔玛和家乐福。

人口
贩运的规模远不止于此,

而且在您
甚至无法想象的地方。

人贩子强迫
年轻人开冰淇淋车,

或在男孩合唱团巡回演唱。

甚至
在新泽西州的一家发辫沙龙中也发现了贩卖人口。

在那种情况下的计划是不可思议的。

人贩子找到了
来自加纳和多哥的年轻家庭

,他们告诉这些家庭
“你的女儿将

在美国接受良好的教育”。

然后他们找到
了绿卡彩票的中奖者,

并告诉他们:“我们会帮助你。

我们会给你买机票。
我们会支付你的费用

。你所要做的就是带着
这个年轻的女孩 你,

说她是你的姐姐或者你的配偶。当

所有人一到新泽西
,年轻的女孩们就被带走

,每天工作 14 小时,

每周 7 天,连续工作了五年。

他们让他们的人贩子
将近四 百万美元。

这是一个巨大的问题。

那么我们做了什么?

我们大多
求助于刑事司法系统。

但请记住,大多数
人口贩运的受害者都是贫穷和边缘化的。

他们是移民, 颜色。

有时他们从事性交易

。对于像这样的人群来说

,刑事司法系统
往往是问题的一部分,

而不是解决方案。


从孟加拉国到美国等国家的研究中,

接受调查的性交易者中有 20% 和 60%

表示他们曾被强奸 或
仅在过去一年被警察殴打。

卖淫者,包括
被贩卖的人,

经常
因卖淫被多次定罪。 如果那个人愿意,

拥有这种犯罪记录

会使摆脱贫困、虐待
或卖淫变得更加困难

性行业以外的工人——

如果他们试图抵制他们的待遇,
他们就有被驱逐出境的风险。

在我研究过的一个又一个案例中,
雇主可以毫无问题地

呼吁执法部门
试图威胁或驱逐

他们罢工的被贩运工人。

如果这些工人逃跑,

他们就有可能成为
大量无证工人的一部分,

如果他们被抓到,他们也会受到执法部门的一时兴起。

执法部门应该识别
受害者并起诉贩运者。

但在全球估计有 2100 万
人口贩运受害者中,

他们帮助并确认了
不到 50,000 人。

这就像

按比例将
世界人口与洛杉矶人口进行

比较。

至于定罪,
在 2013 年估计的 5,700 起定罪中,

不到 500 起涉及劳工贩运。

请记住,劳动力贩运

占所有贩运的 68%,

但不到 10%
的定罪。

我听一位专家说,贩运
发生在需要与贪婪相遇的地方。

我想再添加一个元素。

贩运发生在
工人被排除在保护之外,

并被剥夺组织权的部门。

贩运不是凭空发生的。

它发生在系统性
退化的工作环境中。

你可能会想,

哦,她说的是失败的国家,
或者饱受战争蹂躏的国家,或者——

我实际上是在
谈论美国。

让我告诉你那是什么样子的。

我花了几个月的时间研究
一个名为“全球视野”的贩运案件,

涉及数百名泰国农场工人。

他们被派往美国各地
,在夏威夷菠萝种植园

和华盛顿苹果园
工作,以及任何需要工作的地方。

他们被承诺
三年扎实的农业工作。

所以他们做了一个计算过的风险。

他们卖掉了自己的土地,卖掉
了妻子的珠宝,

为这家名为环球视野的公司赚取了数千美元的招聘费。

但是一旦他们被带过来,

他们的护照就被没收了。

一些人被殴打
并被枪指着。

他们辛辛苦苦地
在田野里晕倒了。

这个案子对我打击很大。

回到家后,

我在杂货店里闲逛,
在农产品部呆住了。

我记得每次我来采访
环球视野的幸存者时,

他们都会为我做的大餐

他们用这
盘完美的长茎草莓吃完了一顿饭

,当他们把它们递给我时,他们说:

“这些草莓
不是你在美国和特别的人一起吃的那种草莓

吗?

而且它们不尝

当你认识
那些为你挑选它们的人时,会更好吗?”

几周后,当我站在那家杂货店时
,我意识到我不

知道该感谢谁

,也不知道他们受到了怎样的
对待。

所以,就像我这个记者一样,我开始
深入农业领域。

而且我发现领域
太多,劳动监察员太少。

我发现

种植者、分销商
和加工商之间存在多层似是而非的否认,天知道还有谁。

环球视野的幸存者被
带到美国

参加一个临时的客工计划。

该客工计划
将一个人的法律地位

与他或她的雇主联系在一起,

并剥夺了该工人
组织的权利。

请注意,我
对这个农业部门

或客工计划
的描述实际上都不是人口贩运。

这只是我们认为在
法律上可以容忍的。

我认为这
是剥削的沃土。 在我试图理解之前

,这一切都对我隐藏
了。

我不是唯一一个
努力解决这些问题的人。

eBay 创始人皮埃尔·奥米迪亚 (Pierre Omidyar)

是世界上最大的反人口贩卖
慈善家之一。

甚至他也意外地在菠萝种植园
投资了近 1000 万美元

,该种植园被
认为是环球视野案中工作条件最差的

当他发现时,他和他的妻子
感到震惊和恐惧

,他们最终
为一家报纸写了一篇专栏文章,

说我们所有人
都应该尽我们所能

了解产品的劳动力和供应
链 我们支持。

我完全同意。

如果我们每个人都决定

如果公司不
消除劳动力和供应链中的剥削,我们将不再支持公司,会发生什么?

如果我们要求法律要求同样的要求?

如果所有的 CEO 都

决定他们要完成
他们的业务并说“不再”?

如果我们取消
农民工的招聘费?

如果我们决定客工
应该有权组织起来

而不必担心遭到报复?

这些将是
世界各地听到的决定。

这不是买
一个公平交易的桃子

然后收工,
用你的钱买一个无罪区的问题。

这不是它的工作原理。

这是改变
一个被破坏的系统的决定

,我们在不知不觉中但心甘情愿地

让自己从中获利
和受益太久了。

我们经常详述人口贩运
幸存者的受害情况。

但这不是我对他们的经验。

多年来,我
一直在与他们交谈,

他们告诉我,
我们不仅仅是最糟糕的日子。

我们每个人
都比我们所经历的要多。

尤其是贩卖幸存者。

这些人是他们所在社区中最机智、最有
韧性和最

负责任的人。

他们是你
愿意赌一把的人。

你会说,我要卖掉我的戒指,
因为我有机会

送你去更美好的未来。

他们是希望的使者。

这些幸存者不需要拯救。

他们需要团结,
因为他们支持当今

一些最激动人心的
社会正义运动。

与他们的家人

和雇主的家人一起游行的保姆和管家——

他们的激进主义让我们
达成了一项

关于家庭工人权利的国际条约。

被贩卖
到性交易中的尼泊尔妇女——

她们走到了一起

,她们决定要让世界
上第一个反贩卖组织

实际上
由贩卖幸存者自己领导和管理。

这些印度造船厂工人
被贩卖

到卡特里娜飓风过后进行
重建。

他们受到驱逐出境的威胁,
但他们冲出工作区

,从新奥尔良游行
到华盛顿特区

,抗议劳工剥削。

他们共同创立了一个
名为全国客工联盟的

组织,通过这个组织,
他们最终帮助其他工人

揭露

了沃尔玛和好时工厂供应链中的剥削和滥用行为。

尽管
司法部拒绝受理他们的案件,但今年 2 月,

一支民权律师团队赢得
了十几起民事诉讼中的第一起

,并为
他们的客户赢得了 1400 万美元。

这些幸存者正在
为他们还不认识的人、

其他工人以及
为我们所有人建立一个公正世界的可能性而战。

这是我们做同样事情的机会。

这是我们做出决定的机会

,告诉我们我们是谁,
作为一个民族和一个社会;

我们的繁荣
不再是繁荣,

只要它寄托
在别人的痛苦上;

我们的生活
密不可分;

并且我们
有权做出不同的选择。

我很不愿意
和你分享我的阿姨的故事。

在我开始这个 TED 过程
并登上这个舞台之前,

我已经告诉了
一些人,

因为,像许多记者一样,

我对了解你的故事更感兴趣,而

不是分享很多,
如果有的话,关于我的 自己的。

我也没有对此进行新闻
尽职调查。

我还没有发出我堆积如山
的文件请求

,采访了所有人和他们的母亲

,我还没有找到我的阿姨。

我不知道她的
故事,以及她现在的生活。

我给你讲的这个故事
是混乱和未完成的。

但我认为它反映了我们在人口贩运方面所处的混乱
和未完成的情况

我们都牵涉到这个问题。

但这意味着我们
都是其解决方案的一部分。

弄清楚如何建立一个更
公正的世界是我们要做的工作,

也是我们要讲述的故事。

因此,让我们从一开始就以我们应该做的方式告诉它

让我们一起讲述这个故事。

太感谢了。

(掌声)