The case for empathetic AI

three years ago

i was cleaning my room on a saturday

afternoon

when i heard the tv switch on in the

living room with a very noisy cartoon

it was quite unusual especially at 3 p.m

in the afternoon considering i am the

kind of dad who tried to limit screen’s

exposition for my young children

so i moved to the living room and i saw

my two boys two and three years old

nicely sitted on the sofa watching

paw patrol so i first

turned back to my wife and asked her why

she had turned on the tv

but it was not her so i went back to the

living room and i asked my son

how i turned on the tv knowing he never

did it before

and to top it off he was watching a

youtube video which represents quite a

complex process

and he replied i asked google papa

clever but it was to my surprise

that my son three years old was simply

able to order

to google ok google can you play paul

patrol

and get something he would never get

from me

especially at 3 p.m on the afternoon but

also

without being polite i’m french and you

know how important it is to be polite

for french people

at that time i asked myself

should i teach my kids to be polite to

google

does google need to learn some manners

and ask for my permission

some things started to be crystal clear

google like many others was

at my home as part of our lives in

forgetting

some fundamental family rules

google’s intelligence assisting and

easing our life

functionally entertaining our family

may slowly influence our kids behaviors

from the youngest age when they start

getting their personalities

shaped we think we create human-centric

ai

but we create machines that are not

entirely serving on mankind

and that generates a much larger

impact on our lives than the one we

expected

and not the most positive one

for instance social media platform we

are using

almost every day sometimes 10 hours a

day

generates a polarization of all society

in influencing and exacerbating all

beliefs

and they are deliberately designed to

make us

addicted and such addiction

generated by those algorithm has

unfortunately been linked with feeling

of unhappiness

depression and mental health issues in

compulsive users

such platforms supposed to serve our

humanity

isolating us are finally not considering

the social element

the social power for human element

and this provokes bad human behavior

change

and ai is even worsening exploiting

our human weaknesses and by relying too

much on technology

sometimes things can go really wrong

like this woman in canada who just drive

drove into the lake stupidly and

following a gps

but the reason i’m actually showing you

this news

is such a similar story is happening to

each of us

almost every day let me explain you

how such dependence and machine affect

our health

and or cognition this is where i live in

singapore

i am living on the 29e of this straight

which naturally comes after the 29a

29bcnd

further down the road before reaching my

home

most of the time i order a taxi the gps

indicates to the taxi driver

to stop at the level of the 29a instead

of 29e

and i can guarantee you taxi driver will

always stop at the level of 29a

and never look around if someone is

waiting a few meters away

i could see on your face it has already

happened to you right

and half of the time the taxi driver

unfortunately missed my street

certainly because the gps algorithm is

not accurate enough

but what worries me is this could happen

two or three times before the driver

even realized something is wrong

have you ever realized a taxi driver can

go around in circle in your neighborhood

for 20 minutes without finding your

street

without realizing is lost but also

without getting informed by the machine

that something is not right

such utter dependence on machine creates

a definite problem

in fact it is affecting all cognition

and studies have proven that habitual

use of gps could pose

long-term health issues such as a higher

risk of alzheimer

as just described ai is embedded in our

daily lives

making multiple decision a longer human

journey

taking some of the most advanced example

facial recognition

is now used to pay at the cashier or

open a gate

health diagnostic are entirely proposed

by machine intelligence

and alone approval would be very soon

entirely in the ends of an algorithm

and these algorithms are walking days

and night 24 hours today and we

don’t see them these

shadow walkers govern a substantial part

of our existence

influence our behaviors potentially

affect our cognition

they often constitute a threat to our

privacy

and this without offering us the

possibility of interacting with them

with a note explaining their choice or

their decision

and without asking for our permission

are we not missing here a two-ways

communication between human and machine

a kind of homogeneous interaction

protocol

to freely define ourselves in relation

to it

and act better accept them as part of

our life

what are we really missing

human are working hard on ai

but ai is not being designed to work

hard enough

for human look ai

system focus essentially on servicing

our human functional needs

however even if they are trained to

detect any addictive

human behavior they are not trained to

prevent

them which can affect our relationship

or health

and have a broader impact on our society

and its organization

ai seeks to understand how our human

cognition

works by creating cognitive processes

that emulate those of human beings

and yes in doing so ai improve the speed

accuracy and efficiency of how people

think and work however

it seems as well its prolonged used

weakens or human cognitive abilities

over time

ai governed lots of our life’s decision

whether personally or

professionally and is unfortunately very

often

not able to explain the reason of such

decision

and properly interact with us to help us

better accept

its choice and what it is offering

current ai design is simply not

taking enough into consideration what

make us truly human

and different from the machine

or behaviors or cognition or emotion

or social interaction

look we rely every day on ai

and ai is even not able to recognize

when we are wearing a mask

while we human continue to recognize

ourself

amongst each other and this is due to

our unique

cognition and social interaction

abilities

we have built these things so it is our

responsibility to change it

in reconsidering our human uniqueness

succeeded in human machine cohabitation

is what is the most complicated used to

say

dominic volton head of research at the

french national center for scientific

research

the for such cohabitation to happen

efficiently

we need to give more space to human in

the design of ai

product and services and foster more

human machine

interaction this will help us to create

real human centric ai

how to proceed first

we need to reassess our ai impact our

lives

behaviors and cognition whether it is on

the short term

or in the long term and we need to

leverage the power

of the data gathered by those ai

products and services to do so

why do we not have a gps based product

or transportation platform

frequently proposing to their drivers

cognition test for instance

the richness of this platform in terms

of data

may really help in detecting any kind of

bad human behavior or addiction

detecting social media addiction might

also be very simple

facebook capturing enough data

should be able to send a signal when a

very addictive behavior

is detected and the strengths of its

algorithm and machine learning

already very much used to detect fake

news

may also be used to analyze how such

addiction could be linked

to any mental health issue as a support

to our healthcare professional

but this would require to be in the

mindset of

maybe opening a bit more this knowledge

and data set to our physician

and maybe slightly changed the business

model of this platform

highly based on our addiction

second we need to redesign ai products

and services

in reconsidering our human and machine

complementarity

and a very good example is the mine nai

process that has been proposed by the

liquid news

center for innovative cities at sutd

here in singapore their team

conducted some applied research on the

design of a gps 2.0

envisioning what a future of the gps

could look like

and instead of a turn-by-turn

instruction drivers

might be given

visual and special cues to help them

navigate in the city

like turn right at the red building or

turn left

after the petrol station at the level of

the bridge

thus protecting the drivers cognitive

and spatial sense of the city

why do we not ask also google to give us

the option to train its algorithm to

some of our

essential social family roles and

eventually allow google to

recognize how we may be polite to each

others

last but not least we need to rescue ai

from its lack of interaction with human

for ai to be truly accepted it should

not be designed

as a trojan horse but offer more human

interaction

and if we want to make a step forward

towards social acceptability of ai

it is a responsibility to pull them out

of the shadow

allow us to see them and interact with

them

let’s push any machine in the social

interaction space to better communicate

with human

by interacting with the taxi driver

in adjusting you know the car

temperature to his mood or playing a

song he likes or even

asking him a question at the end of the

day to know how is he feeling

an algorithm would both work out its

accessibility

and eventually get access to really even

data point

related to the driver’s behaviors and

emotional status

let’s also enhance such interaction

with the maximum of transparency

i would personally value very much that

an

algorithm could give me the reason i

have been rejected from alone

such transparency would help remove

the high reluctance we human have

towards those

shadow walkers and their ambiguity

ai is everyone’s concern

and if we want machine to adapt to all

human needs

each of us would need to assist

them in their adaptive process assess if

they are doing well

and delivering what we are considering

is a human-centric

outcome for each of us

what if we could rate more how machine

fulfill our human and social needs

when we give a five stars to a taxi

driver we are not always

assessing how punctual he was but

sometimes how nice to us he was right

so let’s do systematize such behaviors

and

guide algorithm in delivering a better

and more personal human-centric outcome

and

reward them when they take care of us as

human

let’s reimagine a world where we will

assess more how human

are the artificial intelligence let’s

re-imagine a world

designed around our coexistence with

machine

let’s re-imagine a world in

reconsidering our human uniqueness

and re-empowering any human in guiding

machine

to deliver the right outcome

i am very positive towards such world

and i do hope my kids will be very soon

rewarded by google

with the free perpetual episode but only

when they have been polite thank you

三年前

的一个星期六下午,我在打扫房间

时听到客厅里的电视打开,播放

着一部非常嘈杂的卡通片,

这很不寻常,尤其是在下午 3 点

,考虑到我是

那种试图限制 屏幕上

为我年幼的孩子们展示的展览,

所以我搬到客厅,我看到

我的两个两三岁的男孩

很好地坐在沙发上看

爪子巡逻,所以我首先

转身回到我的妻子身边,问

她为什么打开电视

但不是她,所以我回到

客厅问我儿子我是

怎么打开电视的,知道他以前从来

没有

做过 我问谷歌爸爸

聪明,但令我惊讶的

是,我三岁的儿子

能够简单地

订购谷歌,好吧谷歌你能玩保罗

巡逻队

并得到他永远不会

从我这里得到的东西,

尤其是在下午 3 点而且

没有 ut有礼貌我是法国人,你

知道当时对法国人有礼貌是多么重要

我问自己我

是否应该教我的孩子对

歌有礼貌谷歌是否需要学习一些礼貌

并征求我的许可

开始变得非常清晰

谷歌像许多其他人一样

在我家作为我们生活的一部分

忘记了

一些基本的家庭规则

谷歌的智能协助和

简化我们的生活在

功能上娱乐我们的家庭

可能会慢慢影响我们的孩子

从最小的年龄开始

得到他们的行为 个性

塑造我们认为我们创造了以人为本的

人工智能,

但我们创造的机器并不

完全为人类服务

,而且

对我们的生活产生的影响比我们预期的要大得多,

而不是最积极的影响

,例如我们正在使用的社交媒体平台

几乎每天,有时每天 10 小时

在影响和加剧所有

信仰方面引起整个社会的两极分化

,他们 被故意设计为

让我们

上瘾,不幸的是

,这些算法产生的这种上瘾

与强迫用户

的不快乐感

抑郁和心理健康问题有关,

这些平台应该为我们的人性服务,

孤立我们最终没有

考虑社会因素

的社会力量 人为因素

,这会引发不良的人类行为

改变

,人工智能甚至正在恶化,利用

我们人类的弱点,

过度依赖技术,

有时事情会变得非常糟糕,

就像加拿大的这个女人

愚蠢地开车进入湖中并

跟随 GPS

但 之所以我实际上向您展示

这个消息

因为

几乎每天都在发生在我们每个人身上的类似故事让我向您

解释这种依赖和机器如何影响

我们的健康

和/或认知这是我住在

新加坡的地方

我住在 这条直道的 29e

自然是在 29a

之后 29bcnd 再往前走 到达我

家的

大部分时间我都叫出租车 gps

指示出租车

司机停在 29a 而不是

29e 水平我可以保证你的出租车司机

总是停在 29a 水平

如果有人

在几米外等

我,我可以从你的脸上看到它已经

发生在你

身上,不幸的是,出租车司机有一半的时间

错过了我的街道,

当然是因为 gps 算法

不够准确,

但我担心的是这可能会发生

两次或 在

司机意识到有问题

之前三遍你有没有意识到出租车司机可以

在你附近转一圈

20分钟而没有找到你的

街道

而没有意识到自己迷路了,也

没有被机器

告知有什么不对劲

这样的 完全依赖机器会产生

一个明确的问题

,事实上它会影响所有认知

,研究证明习惯性

使用 gps 可能会带来

长期的健康 h 诸如刚才描述

的阿尔茨海默氏症风险较高等问题

人工智能嵌入我们的

日常生活中

做出多项决定 更长的人类

旅程

采取一些最先进的例子

面部识别

现在用于在收银台付款或

打开大门

健康诊断是 完全

由机器智能提出

,单独批准很快就会

完全在算法的末尾

,这些算法

今天 24 小时不分昼夜地行走,我们

看不到它们这些

影子步行者控制着我们存在的很大一部分

影响我们的行为 潜在地

影响我们的认知

他们经常对我们的隐私构成威胁,

而这没有为我们提供

与他们互动的可能性,并附上

解释他们的选择或决定的便条

,也没有征求我们的

许可,我们在这里没有错过

人与人之间的双向交流吗? 和机器

一种同质的交互

协议

来自由地定义我们自己

与我的关系 t

并采取更好的行动接受它们作为

我们生活的一部分

我们真正缺少什么

人类正在努力研究人工智能

但人工智能并没有被设计为足够努力地工作以适应

人类的外观人工智能

系统基本上专注于

满足我们人类的功能需求

但是即使它们是 接受过

检测任何令人上瘾的

人类行为的训练 他们没有接受过预防这些行为的训练

存在

,是的,这样做,人工智能提高了人们思考和工作方式的速度

准确性和效率,

随着时间的推移,它的长期使用似乎也会削弱或人类的认知能力,

人工智能控制着我们生活中的许多决定,

无论是个人还是

职业,不幸的是,它经常

无法解释做出此类决定的原因

并与我们进行适当的互动以帮助我们

更好地接受 ept

它的选择和它提供的

当前人工智能设计根本没有

充分考虑是什么

让我们真正成为人类

,与我们每天依赖人工智能的机器

、行为、认知、情感

或社交互动

外观不同,

而人工智能甚至无法 识别

我们何时戴着面具,

而我们人类继续

在彼此之间识别自己,这是由于

我们独特的

认知和社会互动

能力,

我们已经建立了这些东西,所以我们有

责任

在重新考虑我们人类的独特

性时改变它 人机同居

是最复杂的

说法

法国国家科学研究中心

研究负责人多米尼克·沃尔顿为了有效地实现这种同居,

我们需要在人工智能产品和服务的设计中给人类更多的空间,

并培养 更多的

人机

交互,这将帮助我们创建

真正以人为中心的人工智能

我们首先要如何进行 需要重新评估我们的人工智能对我们的

生活

行为和认知的影响,无论

是短期

还是长期,我们需要

利用这些人工智能

产品和服务收集的数据的力量来做到这一点

为什么我们没有全球定位系统 基于产品

或交通平台

经常向他们的驾驶员提出

认知测试,例如

该平台在数据方面的丰富性

可能真的有助于检测任何类型的

不良人类行为或成瘾

检测社交媒体成瘾

也可能非常简单

Facebook 捕获足够的数据

应该 能够在检测到

非常上瘾的行为

时发出信号,并且其

算法和机器学习的优势

已经非常用于检测假

新闻,

也可以用来分析这种

上瘾如何

与任何心理健康问题联系起来作为支持

对我们的医疗保健专业人士来说,

但这需要以

可能开放更多这些知识

和数据集的心态 我们的医生

,可能会根据我们的成瘾程度稍微改变

了这个平台的商业模式。

其次,我们需要重新设计人工智能产品

和服务,

以重新考虑我们的人和机器的

互补性

,一个很好的例子是液体提出的 mine nai

流程

新加坡 sutd 创新城市新闻中心,

他们的团队

对 gps 2.0 的设计进行了一些应用研究,

设想 gps 的未来

可能是什么样子

,而不是转向

指示,司机

可能会得到

视觉和特殊的指示 帮助他们

在城市中导航的提示,

例如在红色建筑物右转或

在桥梁水平的加油站后左转,

从而保护驾驶员

对城市的认知和空间感

为什么我们不要求谷歌也给

我们 选择训练其算法以适应

我们一些

重要的社会家庭角色,并

最终让谷歌

认识到我们如何对每个人都彬彬有礼

最后但并非最不重要的一点是,我们需要将人工智能

从缺乏与人类的互动中拯救出来

,这样人工智能才能真正被接受,它

不应该被设计

为特洛伊木马,而是提供更多的人类

互动 ai

把他们从阴影中拉出来是一种责任

让我们看到他们并与他们互动

让我们推动社交互动空间中的任何机器,

通过与出租车司机互动来更好地与人类交流

,调整你知道汽车

温度到他的 心情或播放

他喜欢的歌曲,甚至

在一天结束时问他一个问题,

以了解他

感觉算法如何既可以解决其

可访问性,

又可以最终访问与驾驶员行为和情绪状态相关的真正均匀的

数据点

让我们也

以最大的透明度来增强这种互动

我个人非常重视

算法可以给我被拒绝的原因

这种透明度将有助于消除

我们人类

对那些

影子步行者及其模棱两可的高度不情愿,

人工智能是每个人都关心的问题

,如果我们希望机器适应

人类的所有需求

,我们每个人都需要

在他们的适应过程中帮助他们评估是否

他们做得很好,

并且为我们每个人提供了我们正在考虑

的以人为中心的

结果,

如果我们可以更多地评价机器如何

满足我们的人类和社会需求,

当我们给出租车司机打五颗星时,

我们并不总是

评估如何 他很守时,但

有时他对我们有多好,他是对的,

所以让我们将这些行为系统化

指导算法,以提供更好

、更个人化的以人为中心的结果

并在他们像人类一样照顾我们时奖励他们

让我们重新构想一个我们将

更多地评估人类

是如何人工智能让我们

重新想象一个

围绕我们与机器共存而设计的世界

让我们重新想象一个

重新考虑的世界 g 我们人类的独特性

并重新赋予任何人指导

机器

以提供正确结果

的能力 谢谢