Indias invisible innovation Nirmalya Kumar

over the last two decades India has

become a global hub for software

development and offshoring of back

office services as we call it and what

we were interested in finding out was

that because of this huge industry that

has started over the last two decades in

India offshoring software development on

back office services there’s been a

flight of white-collar jobs from the

developed world to India then this is

combined with the loss of manufacturing

jobs to China it has you know led to

considerable angst amongst the Western

populations in fact if you look at polls

they show a declining trend for support

for free trade in the West now the

Western elites however have said this

fear is misplaced for example if you

have read I suspect many of you have

done so read the book by Thomas Friedman

called the world is flat he said

basically in his book that you know this

fear for free trade is wrong because it

assumes is based on a mistaken

assumption that everything that can be

invented has been invented in fact he

says it’s innovation that will keep the

West ahead of the developing world with

the more sophisticated innovative task

being done in the developed world and

the less sophisticated shall we say

drudge work being done in the developing

world now what we were trying to

understand was is this true could India

become a source or a global hub of

innovation just like it’s become a

global hub for back-office services and

software development and for the last

four years

my co-author furnished puranam and I

spent investigating this topic initially

all you know as people would say you

know in fact the more aggressive people

who are supporting the Western

innovative model say where are the

Indian Google’s iPods and viagra’s if

the Indians are so bloody smart

so initially when we started our

research we went and met several

executives and we asked them what do you

think will India go from being a favored

destination for software services and

back office services to a destination

for innovation they laughed they

dismissed us they said you know what

Indians don’t do innovation the more

polite one said well you know Indians

make good software programmers and

accountants but they can’t do the

creative stuff sometimes it took a more

book a veneer of sophistication and

people said you know it’s nothing to do

with Indians it’s really the road based

regimented education system in India

that is responsible for killing all

creativity they said instead if you want

to see real creativity go to Silicon

Valley and look at companies like Google

Microsoft Intel so we started examining

the R&D and innovation labs of Silicon

Valley well interestingly what you find

there is usually your head introduced to

the head of the innovation lab or the

R&D center as they may call it and more

often than not it’s an Indian so I

immediately said well but you could not

have been educated in India right you

must have gotten your education here it

turned out in every single case they

came out of the Indian educational

system so we realize that maybe we have

the wrong question and the right

question is really can Indians based out

of India do innovative work so off we

went to India we made I think about a

dozen trips to Bangalore Mumbai Google

Delhi Hyderabad you name it to examine

what is the level of corporate

innovation in this country in these

cities and what we found was as we

progressed in our research was that we

were asking really the wrong question

when you ask where are the Indian

Google’s iPods and viagra’s you are

taking a particular perspective on

innovation which is innovation for

end-users visible innovation instead

innovation if you remember some of you

may have read the famous economist sham

Peter

he said innovation is normal T in how

value is created and distributed it

could be new products and services but

it could also be new ways of producing

products

it could also be normal ways of

organizing firms and industries once you

take this there is no reason to restrict

innovation the beneficiaries of

innovation just to end-users when you

take this broader conceptualization of

innovation what we found was India is

very represented in innovation but the

innovation that is being done in India

is of a form we did not anticipate and

what we did was we called it invisible

innovation and specifically there are

four types of invisible innovation that

are coming out of India the first type

of invisible innovation out of India is

what we call innovation for business

customers which is led by the

multinational corporations which have in

the last two decades there have been 750

R&D centers set up in India by

multinational companies employing more

than 400,000 professionals now when you

consider the fact that historically the

rnd center of a multinational company

was always in the headquarters or or in

the country of origin of that

multinational company to have 750 R&D

centers of multinational corporations in

India is truly a remarkable figure when

we went and talked to the people in that

in those innovation centers and asked

them what are they working on they said

we are working on global products they

were not working on localizing global

products for India which is the usual

low role of a local R&D they were

working on truly global products and

companies like Microsoft Google Astra

Zeneca General Electric Philips have

already asked answered in the

affirmative the question that from their

Bangalore and Hyderabad R&D centers they

are able to produce products and

services for the world but of course as

an end user you don’t see that because

you only see the name of the company not

where it was developed the other thing

we were told then was yes but you know

the kind of work that is coming out of

the Indian R&D center cannot be compared

to the kind of work that is coming out

of the US R&D sentence so my co-author

finished puranam who happens to be one

of the smartest people I know said he’s

going to do a study what he did was he

looked at those companies that had an

rnd

Center in USA and in India and then he

looked at a patent that was filed out of

the US and a similar patent filed out of

the same company subsidiary in India so

he is now comparing the patterns of R&D

centers in the US with R&D centers in

India of the same company to find out

what is the quality of the patents filed

out of the Indian centers and how do

they compare with the quality of the

patents filed out of the US Centers

increasingly what he finds is and by the

way the way we look at the quality of a

patent is what we call forward citations

how many times does a future patent

reference the older patent you find

something very interesting what we find

is that the data says that the number of

forward citations of a patent filed out

of the US R&D subsidiary is identical to

the number of forward citations of a

patent filed by an Indian subsidy of the

same company within that company so

within the company there is no

difference in the forward citation rates

of the Indian subsidiaries versus the

u.s. subsidiaries so that’s the first

kind of invisible innovation coming out

of India second kind of energy visible

innovation coming out of India is what

we call outsourcing innovation to Indian

companies where many companies today are

contracting Indian companies to do a

major part of the product development

work for their global products which are

going to be sold to the entire world for

example in the pharma industry a lot of

the molecules are being developed well

you see a major part of that work is

being given sent to India for example

HCL technologies they developed two of

the Mission Control critical systems for

the new Boeing 787 Dreamliner one to

avoid collisions in the sky and another

to allow landing in zero visibility but

of course when you climb onto the Boeing

787 you are not going to know that this

is invisible innovation out of India the

third kind of invisible innovation

coming out of India is what we call

process innovations because of an

injection of intelligence by Indian

firms only process innovation is

different from product innovation it’s

about how do you create a new product or

develop a new product or manufacture a

new product but not a new

wrap itself only in India do millions of

young people dream of working in a call

center what happens you know it’s a

dead-end job in the West where high

school dropouts do what happens when you

put hundreds of thousands of smart young

ambitious kids on a call center job very

quickly they get bored and they start

innovating and they start telling the

boss how to do this job better and out

of this process innovation comes product

innovations which are then marketed

around the world for example 24/7

customer traditional call center company

used to be a traditional call center

company today they’re developing

analytical tools to do predictive

modeling so that before you pick up the

phone you can guess or predict what this

phone call is about is because of an

injection of intelligence into a process

which is considered dead for a long time

in the West and the last kind of

innovation innovation coming our

invisible innovation coming out of India

is what we call management innovation is

not a new product or a new process but a

new way to organize work and the most

significant management innovation to

come out of India invented by the Indian

offshoring industry is what we call the

global delivery model

well the global delivery model allows it

it allows you to take previously

geographically co-located tasks break

them up into parts send them around the

world where the expertise and the cost

structure exists and then specify the

means for reintegrating them without

that you could not have any of the other

invisible innovations tooling so what

I’m trying to say is what we are finding

in our research is that if products for

end-users is the visible tip of the

innovation iceberg India is very

represented in the invisible large

submerged portion of the innovation

iceberg now this has of course some

implications and so we developed three

implications of this research the first

is what we call sinking skill ladder and

now I’m going to go back

where I started my conversation with you

which was about the flight of jobs now

of course when we first as a

multinational company decide to

outsource jobs to India in the rnd what

we are going to do is we are going to

outsource the bottom rung of the ladder

to India the least sophisticated jobs

just like Tom Friedman would predict now

what happens is when you outsource the

bottom rung of the ladder to India for

innovation and for R&D work at some

stage in the very near future you are

going to have to confront a problem

which is where does the next step of the

ladder people come from within your

company so you have two choices then

either you bring the people from India

into the developed world to take

positions in the next step of the ladder

immigration or you say there are so many

people in the bottom step of the ladder

waiting to take the next position in

India why don’t we move the next step to

India what we are trying to say is that

once you outsource the bottom end of the

ladder you it’s a self-perpetuating act

because of the sinking skill lager and a

sinking skill ladder is simply the point

that you can’t be an investment banker

without having been an analyst once you

can’t be a professor without having been

a student you can’t be a consultant

without having been a research associate

so if you outsource the least

sophisticated jobs at some stage the

next step of the ladder has to follow

the second thing we bring up is what we

call the browning of the TMP the top

management teams

if the rnd talent is going to be based

out of India and China and the largest

growth markets are going to be based out

of India and China you have to confront

the problem that your top management of

the future is going to have to come out

of India and China because that’s where

the product leadership is that’s where

the important market leadership is and

the last thing we point out in this

slide which is you know that to the

story there’s one caveat India has the

youngest growing population in the world

this demographic dividend is incredible

but paradoxically there’s also the

Mirage of mighty labor pools

Indian Institutes and educational system

with a few exceptions are incapable of

producing students

the quantity and quality needed to keep

this innovation engine going so

companies are finding innovative ways to

overcome this but in the end it does not

absolve the government of the

responsibility for creating this

educational structure so finally I want

to conclude by showing you the profile

of one company IBM as many of you know

iBM has always been considered for the

last hundred years to be one of the most

innovative companies in fact if you look

at the number of patents filed over

history I think they are in the top or

the top two or three companies in the

world of all patents filed in the USA as

a private company here is the profile of

employees of IBM over the last decade in

2003 they had 300,000 employees or 330

thousand employees out of which 135,000

were in America 9,000 were in India in

2000 and in 2009 they had 400,000

employees by which time the USM flies

had moved to 105 thousand whereas the

Indian employees had gone to 100,000

well in 2010 they decided they’re not

going to reveal this data anymore so I

had to make some estimates based on

various sources here are my best guesses

okay I’m not saying this is the exact

number it’s my best guess it gives you a

sense of the trend there are four

hundred and thirty three thousand people

now at IBM out of which 98 thousand are

remaining in the US and 150 thousand are

in India so you tell me is Ibn an

American company or an Indian company

ladies and gentlemen thank you very much

you

在过去的二十年里,印度已经

成为我们所说的软件

开发和后台服务离岸外包的全球中心,

我们有兴趣发现的是

,由于这个巨大的行业

在过去的二十年中开始在

印度离岸外包

后台服务的软件开发 有大量

白领工作从

发达国家流向印度,

再加上制造业

工作岗位流失到

中国 在民意调查中,

他们显示西方对自由贸易的支持呈下降趋势,

现在

西方精英们表示这种

恐惧是错误的,例如,如果你

读过我怀疑你们中的许多人已经

这样做了,那么阅读托马斯弗里德曼的书,

叫做世界是 平他

基本上在他的书中说,你知道这种

对自由贸易的恐惧是错误的,因为它

假设是基于一个错误的

假设,即一切 可以被

发明 已经被发明了 事实上,他

说创新将使

西方领先于

发展中国家 我们试图

理解的是,印度是否会

成为创新的源头或全球中心,

就像它已

成为后台服务和

软件开发的全球中心一样,在过去的

四年中,

我的合著者提供了 puranam 和我

最初花了很多时间研究这个话题,

正如人们所说的那样

,事实上,支持西方创新模式的更具侵略性的

人会

说,

如果印度人非常聪明,那么印度谷歌的 iPod 和伟哥在哪里,

所以最初当我们开始

研究时 我们去见了几位

高管,我们问他们你

认为印度将如何从成为软件的青睐

目的地 重新服务和

后台服务到

创新的目的地 他们笑了 他们

解雇了我们 他们说你知道

印度人不做创新 更

有礼貌的人说得好 你知道

印度人是优秀的软件程序员和

会计师,但他们不能做

创意 有时它需要更多的

书,表面上是复杂的,

人们说你知道这

与印度人无关,如果你想看到真正的创造力消失,实际上是印度基于道路的受

管制的教育系统

负责

扼杀他们所说的所有

创造力 去

硅谷看看像谷歌

微软英特尔这样的公司,所以我们开始很好地

研究硅谷的研发和创新实验室

而且

通常它是印度人,所以我

立即说好,但是您不可能

在印度接受过教育,对,您

一定有 已经在这里接受了你的教育,

结果在每一个案例中,他们

都来自印度教育

系统,所以我们意识到,也许我们

有错误的问题,正确

的问题

是印度以外的印度人真的可以做创新工作,所以我们

去了 印度我们做了我想了

十几次去班加罗尔孟买谷歌

德里海得拉巴你说的来检查

这个国家在这些

城市的企业创新水平是什么,我们发现随着

我们研究的进展,我们

真的在问 错误的问题

当你问印度

谷歌的 iPod 和伟哥在哪里时,你

对创新采取了特殊的观点,

这是对

最终用户的创新,而不是

创新 是如何

创造和分配价值的正常 T 它

可能是新产品和服务,但

也可能是生产

产品的新方式 s

这也可能是

组织公司和行业的正常方式,一旦你

采取了这一点,就没有理由将创新限制

在最终用户当你

采取这种更广泛的创新概念时,

创新的受益者我们发现印度

在创新方面很有代表性 但是

印度正在进行的创新

是一种我们没有预料到的形式,

我们所做的是我们称之为无形

创新,具体来说

,印度

有四种无形创新。 印度是

我们所说的商业客户创新,

它由跨国公司领导,

在过去的二十年里

,跨国公司在印度设立了 750 个研发中心,

现在雇佣了超过 400,000 名专业人员。

跨国公司的 rnd 中心

总是在总部

或原产国 那

家跨国公司在印度拥有 750

个跨国公司研发中心,

这真是一个了不起的数字

没有致力于

为印度本地化全球产品,这通常

是当地研发部门的低级角色,他们

正在开发真正的全球产品,

像微软、谷歌、

阿斯利康、通用电气、飞利浦这样的公司已经

明确回答了来自

班加罗尔和 海得拉巴研发中心,

他们能够为世界生产产品和

服务,但

作为最终用户,您当然看不到这一点,因为

您只看到公司的名称,而不是公司的

开发地点,

当时我们被告知的另一件事是肯定的 但你知道

印度研发中心的工作不能与 T 中心

的工作

相提并论 他在美国研发的句子,所以我的合著者

完成了 puranam,他恰好是

我认识的最聪明的人之一,他说他

要做一项研究,他所做的是他

研究了那些

在美国和印度设有 rnd 中心的公司,然后 他

查看了一项

从美国提交的专利以及

从同一家公司在印度的子公司提交的类似专利,因此

他现在将

美国研发中心的模式与

同一家公司在印度的研发中心进行比较,以找出

从印度中心提交的专利质量

如何?

它们与

从美国中心

提交的

专利质量相比如何 我们所说的前向引用

未来专利引用了多少次

旧专利 你会发现

一些非常有趣的事情 我们

发现数据表明美国研发子公司

提交的专利的前向引用次数

是相同的 与

该公司内同一公司的印度补贴提交的专利的前向引用次数相比,

因此

在公司内部,印度子公司与美国子公司

的前向引用率没有差异。

这是第

一种来自印度的无形创新

第二种来自印度的能源有形

创新就是

我们所说的将创新外包给印度

公司,如今许多公司都

与印度公司签订合同,以完成

产品开发工作的主要部分

他们的全球产品

将销往全世界,

例如在制药行业,

许多分子正在开发中,

你会看到大部分工作都

被送到印度,例如

他们开发了两种 HCL 技术 新波音 787 Dreamliner

的任务控制关键系统,

一个是为了

避免在天空中发生碰撞,另一个

是允许在零能见度下着陆,

但当然,当你爬上波音

787 时,你不会知道这

是无形的创新 印度

第三种来自印度的无形创新

就是我们所说的

流程创新,因为

注入 关于印度公司的智慧

只有流程创新

不同于产品创新它是

关于你如何创造新产品或

开发新产品或制造

新产品而不是新

包装本身只有在印度数百万

年轻人梦想工作 在呼叫

中心会发生什么 你知道在西方这是一个

死胡同

高中辍学的人会发生 当你

让数十万聪明的年轻

有抱负的孩子在呼叫中心工作时会发生什么

他们很快就会感到无聊并开始

创新和 他们开始告诉

老板如何更好地完成这项工作,

从这个过程中创新产生了产品

创新,然后

在全球范围内销售,例如 24/7

客户传统呼叫中心公司

曾经是一家传统呼叫中心

公司,今天他们正在发展

用于进行预测建模的分析工具,

以便在您拿起电话之前,

您可以猜测或预测此

电话的内容是

因为 将智能注入在西方

长期被认为已死的过程中

,最后一种

创新创新来自印度,我们

无形的创新

就是我们所说的管理创新,

不是新产品或新流程,而是

新 印度离岸外包行业发明的工作组织方式和最

重要的管理创新

就是我们所说的

全球交付模式

将它们发送到

存在专业知识和成本结构的世界各地,

然后

指定重新整合它们的方法,

否则您将无法拥有任何其他

隐形创新工具,所以

我想说的是我们

在 我们的研究是,如果面向

最终用户的产品是

创新冰山的可见一角,

印度在无形的大 创新

冰山的淹没部分现在这当然有一些

含义,所以我们开发

了这项研究的三个含义,第一个

是我们所说的下沉技能阶梯,

现在我要

回到我开始与你交谈的地方,

那是

当然,当我们作为一家跨国公司第一次

决定

将工作外包给印度时,

我们现在要做的就是

将阶梯的最底层外包

给印度,就像最不复杂的工作

一样 汤姆弗里德曼现在预测

会发生什么,当你在不久的将来某个阶段

将阶梯的最底层外包给印度进行

创新和研发工作时

,你

将不得不面对一个问题

,即下一步该做什么?

阶梯人员来自您的

公司内部,因此您有两个选择,

然后您将印度

的人员带到发达国家,

以便在阶梯的下一步中任职

mmigration 或者你说有那么

多人在阶梯的最底层

等待在印度担任下一个职位

为什么我们不把下一步搬到

印度 我们想说的是

一旦你外包了

阶梯你这是一个自我延续的行为,

因为下沉的技能拉格和

下沉的技能阶梯只是一点

,你不能成为一名投资银行家

而不是分析师,一旦你

不能成为教授而不是

一个 学生,如果没有研究助理,你就不能成为顾问

所以如果你

在某个阶段外包最不复杂的工作

,那么阶梯的下一步必须遵循

我们提出的第二件事,就是我们

所说的 TMP 褐变 高层

管理团队

如果 rnd 人才将

位于印度和中国之外,而最大的

增长市场将

位于印度和中国之外,那么您必须面对

未来高层管理人员将走向何方的问题 必须从

印度和中国出来,因为那是

产品领导地位的地方,

那是重要的市场领导地位所在,

我们在这张幻灯片中指出的最后一件事

是,你知道这个

故事有一个警告印度拥有

最年轻的人口增长 在世界上,

这种人口红利是不可思议的,

但自相矛盾的是,也有

海市蜃楼的强大劳动力资源

印度学院和教育系统

除了少数例外,无法

培养

出保持创新引擎运转所需的数量和质量的学生,

因此

公司正在寻找创新的方法来

克服这一点,但最终它并没有

免除政府

创建这种

教育结构的责任,所以最后我想

通过向你们展示一家 IBM 公司的概况作为结束,因为你们中的

许多人都知道

IBM 在

过去的一百年中一直被考虑

如果您查看专利数量,实际上是最具创新性的公司之一

提交的

历史 我认为他们在美国作为私人公司提交的所有专利中处于世界前两名

或前两名或前三名的

公司 这

是 IBM 在过去十年中在

2003 年拥有 300,000 名员工或 330,000

名员工,其中 135,000

名在美国 2000 年有 9,000 名在印度,

2009 年他们有 400,000

名员工,到

那时 USM 已经飞到 105,000 名,而

印度员工

在 2010 年已经达到 100,000 名,他们决定

不再透露这些数据,所以我

不得不根据各种来源做出一些估计,

这是我最好的猜测,

好吧,我不是说这是确切的

数字,这是我最好的猜测,它让你

了解趋势,有四百

IBM 现在有 33000 人,其中 98000 人

留在美国,150000 人

在印度,所以你告诉我 Ibn 是

美国公司还是印度公司

女士们先生们,非常感谢你们 你好