Will our kids be a different species Juan Enriquez

you

all right so like all good stories this

starts a long long time ago when there

was basically nothing so here is a

complete picture of the universe about

40 not billion years ago all energy is

concentrated into a single point of

energy for some reason it explodes and

you begin to get these things so you’re

now about 14 billion years under this

and these things expand and expand and

expand into these giant galaxies and you

get trillions of them and within these

galaxies you get these enormous dust

clouds and I want you to pay particular

attention to the three little prongs in

the center of this picture if you take a

close-up of those they look like this

and what you’re looking at is columns of

dust where there’s so much dust by the

way the scale of this is a trillion

vertical miles and what’s happening is

there’s so much dust it comes together

and it fuses and ignites a thermonuclear

reaction and so what you’re watching is

the birth of stars these are stars being

born out of here when enough stars come

out they create a galaxy this one

happens to be a particularly important

galaxy because you are here and as you

take a close-up of this galaxy you find

a relatively normal not particularly

interesting start by the way you’re now

about two-thirds of the way into this

story so this star doesn’t even appear

until about two thirds away in this

story and then what happens is there’s

enough dust left over that it doesn’t

ignite into a star it becomes a planet

and this is about a little over four

billion years ago and soon thereafter

there’s enough material left over that

you get a primordial soup and that

creates life and life starts to expand

and expand and expand until it goes

couplet now the really strange thing is

life goes kaput not once not twice but

five times so almost all life on Earth

is wiped out about five times and as

you’re thinking about that what happens

is you get more and more complexity more

and more stuff to build new things with

and we don’t appear until about

ninety-nine point nine six percent of

the time into this story just to put

ourselves and our ancestors in

perspective so within that context

there’s two theories of the case as to

why we’re all here the first theory of

the case is that’s all she wrote right

under that theory we are the be-all and

end-all of all creation and the reason

for trillions of galaxies sixth ilion’s

of planets is to create something that

looks like that and something that looks

like that and that’s the purpose of the

universe and then it flatlines it

doesn’t get any better

the only question you might want to ask

yourself is could that be just mildly

arrogant and if it is and particularly

given the fact that we came very close

to extinction there were only about

2,000 of our species left a few more

weeks without rain we would have never

seen any of these

so maybe you have to think about a

second theory if the first one isn’t

good enough second theory is could we

upgrade well why wouldn’t one ask a

question like that because there have

been at least 29 upgrades so far of

humanoids so it turns out that we have

upgraded we’ve upgraded time and again

and again and it turns out that we keep

discovering upgrades we found this one

last year we found another one last

month and as you’re thinking about this

you might also ask the question so why a

single human species wouldn’t it be

really odd if you went to Africa and

Asia and Antarctica and found exactly

the same bird particularly given that we

coexisted at the same time with at least

eight other versions of humanoid at the

same time on this planet so the normal

state of affairs is not to have just a

homo sapiens the normal state of affairs

is to have various versions of humans

walking around and if that is the normal

state of affairs then you might ask

yourself all right so if we wanted to

create something else how big does the

mutation have to be well

Svante Paabo has the answer the

difference between humans and

Neanderthals is point zero zero four

percent of gene code that’s how big the

differences one species to another

this explains most contemporary

political debates

but as you’re thinking about this one of

the interesting things is how small

these mutations are and where they take

place difference human Neanderthal is

sperm and testes smell and skin and

those are the specific genes that differ

from one to the other so very small

changes can have a big impact and as

you’re thinking about this we’re

continuing to mutate so about 10,000

years ago by the Black Sea

we had one mutation in one gene which

led to blue eyes and this is continuing

and continuing and continuing and as it

continues one of the things that’s going

to happen this year is we’re going to

discover the first 10,000 human genomes

because it’s gotten cheap enough to do

the gene sequencing and when we find

these we may find differences and by the

way this is not a debate that we’re

ready for because we have really misused

the science in this in the 1920s we

thought there were major differences

between people that was partly based on

Francis Galton’s work

he was Darwin’s cousin what the US the

Carnegie Institute Stanford alone or

American neurological Association took

this really far that got exported and

was really misused in fact it lets some

absolute horrendous treatment of human

beings so since the 1940s we’ve been

saying there are no differences we are

all identical we’re gonna know what your

end of that is true and as we think

about that we’re actually beginning to

find things like do you have an ace gene

why would that matter because nobody’s

ever climbed an 8,000 meter peak without

oxygen that doesn’t have an ace gene and

if you want to get more specific about a

577 our genotype well it turns out that

every male Olympic power athlete ever

tested carries at least one of these

variants if that is true it leads to

some very complicated questions for the

London Olympics three options do you

want the Olympics to be a showcase for

really hard working mutants

option number two why don’t we play it

like golf or sailing because you have

one and you don’t have one I’ll give you

a tenth of a second Head Start version

number three because this is a naturally

occurring gene and you’ve got it and you

didn’t pick the right parents you get

the right to upgrade three different

options if these differences are the

difference between Olympic medal and a

non Olympic medal and it turns out that

as we discover these things we human

beings really like to change how we look

how we act what our bodies do and we had

about ten point two million plastic

surgery the United States except that

with the technologies that are coming

online today today’s Corrections

deletions augmentations and enhancements

are gonna seem like child’s play you

already saw the work by Tony Atala on

Ted but this ability to start filling

things like inkjet cartridges with cells

or allowing us to print skin organs and

a whole series of other body parts and

as these technologies go forward you

know you keep seeing this you keep

seeing this you keep seeing things mm

human genome sequence and it seems like

nothing’s happening until it does and we

may just be in some of these weeks and

as you’re thinking about you know these

two guys sequencing a human genome in

2000 and the public project sequencing

the human genome in 2000 you don’t hear

a lot till you hear about an experiment

last year in China where they take skin

cells from this mouse put four chemicals

on it turn those skin cells into stem

cells what the stem cells grow and

create a full copy of that mouse that’s

a big deal

because in essence what it means is you

can take a cell which is a pluripotent

stem cell which is like a skier at the

top of a mountain and those two skiers

become two pluripotent stem cells for

8:16 and then it gets so crowded after

16 divisions that those cells have to

differentiate so they go down one side

of the mountain they go down another and

as they pick that these become bone and

then they pick another road and these

become platelets and these became

macrophages and these become t-cells but

it’s really hard once you ski down to

get back up

unless of course if you have a ski lift

and what those four chemicals do is they

take any cell and take it way back up

the mountain so it can become any body

part and as you think of that what it

means is potentially you can rebuild a

full copy of any organism out of any one

of its cells that turns out to be a big

deal because now you can take not just

no cells but you can take human skin

cells and turn them into human stem

cells and then what they did in October

is they took skin cells turn them into

stem cells and begin to turn that into

liver cells so in theory you could grow

any organ from any one of your cells

here’s a second experiment if you could

photocopy your body maybe you also want

to take your mind and one of the things

you saw at Ted about a year and a half

ago was this guy and he gave a wonderful

technical talk using professor at MIT

but in essence what he said is you can

take retroviruses which get inside brain

cells of mice you can tag them with

proteins that light up when you light

them and you can map the exact pathways

when a mouse sees feels touches

remembers loves and then you can take a

fiber-optic cable and light up some of

the same things

and by the way as you do this you can

image it in two colors which means you

can download this information as binary

code directly into a computer so what’s

the bottom line on that well it’s not

completely inconceivable but someday

you’ll be able to download your own

memories maybe into a new body and maybe

you can upload other people’s memories

as well and this might have just one or

two small ethical political moral

implications just a thought

here’s the kind of questions that are

becoming interesting questions for

philosophers for governing people for

economists for scientists because these

technologies are moving really quickly

and as you think about it let me close

with an example of the brain the first

place where you would expect to see

enormous evolutionary pressure today

both because of the inputs which are

becoming massive and because of the

plasticity of the organ is the brain do

we have any evidence that that is

happening well let’s take a look at

something like autism incidents per

thousand here’s what it looks like in

2000 here’s what it looks like in 2002

2006 2008 here’s the increase in less

than a decade and we still don’t know

why this is happening what we do know is

potentially the brain is reacting a

hyper reactive hyperplastic way and

creating individuals that are like this

and this is only one of the conditions

in souther you’ve also got people who

are extraordinarily smart people who can

remember everything they’ve seen in

their lives people who gussed anesthesia

people guts gets rafinha got all kinds

of stuff going on out there and we still

don’t understand how and why this is

happening but one question you might

want to ask is are we seeing a rapid

evolution of the brain

and of how we process data because when

you think of how much data is coming

into our brains we’re trying to take in

as much data in a day as people used to

take in in a lifetime and as you’re

thinking about this there’s four

theories as to why this might be going

on plus a whole series of others I don’t

have a good answer there really needs to

be more research on this one option is a

fast-food fetish there is beginning to

be some evidence that obesity and diet

have something to do with gene

modifications which may or may not have

an impact on how the brain of an infant

works a second option is the sexy geek

option these conditions are highly rare

but what’s beginning to happen is

because these geeks are all getting

together because they are highly

qualified for computer programming and

it is highly remunerated as well as

other very detail-oriented tasks that

they are concentrating geographically

and finding like-minded mates so this is

the sort of mating hypothesis of these

genes reinforcing one another in these

structures the third is is too much

information we’re trying to process so

much stuff that some people get

synesthetic and just have huge pipes and

remember everything other people get

hypersensitive the amount of information

other people react with various

psychological conditions or reactions to

this information or maybe it’s chemicals

but when you see an increase of that

order of magnitude in a condition either

you’re not measuring it right or there’s

something going on very quickly and it

may be evolution in real time here’s the

bottom line what I think we are doing is

we’re transitioning as a species and I

didn’t think this when Steve Collins and

I started writing together I think we’re

transitioning into a home level lootus

that for better or worse is not just a

hominid this conscious of his or her

environment

it’s a hominid that’s beginning to

directly and deliberately control the

evolution of its own species of bacteria

of plants of animals and I think that’s

such an order of magnitude change that

your grandkids or your great grandkids

may be a species very different from you

thank you very much

好吧,就像所有好故事一样,这

是很久以前开始的,

那时基本上什么都没有,所以这是

大约

40 亿年前宇宙的

全貌

你开始得到这些东西 所以你

现在在这个之下大约 140 亿

年 这些东西

在这些巨大的星系中不断扩张和扩张 你

得到数万亿个它们 在这些

星系中你得到这些巨大的尘埃

云 我想要你 要特别

注意

这张照片中央的三个小尖头,如果你

对它们看起来像这样的特写镜头

,你看到的是灰尘柱,

顺便说一下,灰尘太多了 这是一万亿

英里的垂直英里,正在发生的事情是

有这么多的尘埃聚集在一起

,它融合并点燃了热核

反应,所以你正在观看的是

恒星的诞生这些是恒星b

当足够多的恒星出现时,从这里诞生

,它们创造了一个星系,这个星系

恰好是一个特别重要的

星系,因为你在这里,当你

对这个星系进行特写时,你会发现

一个相对正常但并不特别

有趣的开始 你现在已经

进入了这个故事的三分之二,

所以这颗星星甚至

直到故事的三分之二左右才出现

,然后发生的事情是

剩下的灰尘足够多,它不会

点燃成星星 变成了一颗行星

,这大约是 40

亿多年前,不久之后

,剩下的足够多的物质,

你得到了原始汤,

创造了生命,生命开始扩大

,扩大,扩大,直到现在变成

对联,这真的很奇怪

生命不是一次,不是两次,而是

五次,所以地球上几乎所有的生命都

被消灭了大约五次,当

你在想,发生的事情

是你变得越来越复杂,

越来越多 uff 来构建新事物

,直到大约

99 点 9 6%

的时间我们才会出现在这个故事中,只是为了让

我们和我们的祖先正确

看待,所以在这种情况下,

有两种理论来

解释为什么我们 ‘都在这里 案例的第一个理论

就是这就是她

在该理论下写的所有内容 我们

是所有创造的全部和最终全部

数万亿个星系的原因 第六

个行星的原因是要创造一些

看起来像的东西 那以及看起来

像那样的东西,这就是宇宙的目的

,然后它变得平坦,它

并没有变得更好

你可能想问自己的唯一问题

是,这是否只是有点

自大,如果是这样,特别是

考虑到事实 我们非常

接近灭绝

,我们的物种中只有大约 2,000 个物种在

没有下雨的情况下再剩下几个星期,我们将永远不会

看到任何这些,

所以

如果第一个理论不是,也许你必须考虑第二个理论

足够好的第二个理论是我们

能不能很好地升级为什么不

问这样的问题因为到目前为止已经有

至少 29 次

类人生物升级所以事实证明

我们已经升级了我们一次又一次地升级

它 事实证明我们不断

发现升级我们去年发现了这个

我们上个月发现了另一个

当你在思考这个问题时

你可能还会问这个问题为什么如果你去一个

单一的人类物种不会

真的很奇怪 非洲、

亚洲和南极洲发现了

完全相同的鸟,特别是考虑到我们

在这个星球上同时与至少八个其他版本的类人生物同时共存,所以

正常的情况不是只有一个

智人 正常情况

是让各种版本的人类

四处走动,如果这是正常

情况,那么您可能会问

自己好吧,如果我们想

创造其他东西,

突变有多大 必须很好

Svante Paabo 有答案

人类和

尼安德特人之间的差异是零点

百分之四的基因代码 这就是

一个物种与另一个物种的差异有多大

这解释了大多数当代

政治辩论,

但是当你正在考虑

这个 有趣的是

这些突变有多小以及它们

发生的位置差异人类尼安德特人是

精子和睾丸的气味和皮肤,

这些是彼此不同的特定基因,

因此非常小的

变化可能会产生很大的影响,因为

你是 考虑到这一点,我们正在

继续突变,所以大约 10,000

年前,

我们在黑海的一个基因中发生了一次突变,

导致了蓝眼睛,这正在继续

,继续,继续,随着它

继续,其中一件将

要发生的事情 今年我们将

发现前 10,000 个人类基因组,

因为它变得足够便宜,可以

进行基因测序,当我们找到

这些时,我们可能会找到 差异,

顺便说一句,这不是我们准备好的辩论,

因为我们

在 1920 年代确实滥用了科学,我们

认为

人与人之间存在重大差异,部分原因是

弗朗西斯·高尔顿的工作,

他是达尔文的表弟,什么是 美国

卡内基研究所斯坦福大学或

美国神经病学协会走了

这么远,它被出口

并被滥用,事实上它让

人类受到了一些绝对可怕的待遇,

所以自 1940 年代以来,我们一直在

说没有差异,我们

都是相同的,我们 '’'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''

' 有一个 ace 基因,

如果你想更具体地了解

577 我们的基因型,结果证明,

每一个经过测试的男性奥林匹克力量运动员都

至少携带一个

如果这是真的,它会导致

一些非常复杂的问题

伦敦奥运会 三个选项 你

希望奥运会成为

真正努力工作的突变体的展示

场吗 选项二 为什么我们不像打高尔夫球或帆船那样玩,因为你有

一个,而你没有一个,我会给

你十分之一秒的 Head Start

第 3 版,因为这是一个自然

发生的基因,你有它,但你

没有选择合适的父母,

你有权

如果这些差异是

奥运奖牌和

非奥运奖牌之间的区别,则升级三个不同的选项,事实证明,

当我们发现这些东西时,我们

人类真的很喜欢改变我们的外观

我们的行为方式我们的身体所做的事情,我们有

大约十个 指向

美国的 200 万整形手术,除了今天

上线的技术,

今天的更正

删除、增强和

增强看起来就像儿戏,你

已经看到了这个问题 k by Tony Atala on

Ted 但是这种能力可以开始

用细胞填充诸如喷墨墨盒之类的东西,

或者允许我们打印皮肤器官和

一系列其他身体部位,

随着这些技术的发展,你

知道你会一直看到这个,你会一直

看到这个你 继续看东西——

人类基因组序列,在它出现

之前似乎什么都没有发生,我们

可能只是在这几周的一些时间里

2000 年的人类基因组

直到你听说

去年在中国进行的一项实验 他们

从这只老鼠身上提取皮肤细胞 将四种化学物质

放在上面 将这些皮肤细胞变成干

细胞 干细胞生长并

产生完整的 那只老鼠的副本

很重要,

因为从本质上讲,这意味着您

可以获取一个多

能干细胞细胞,就像

山顶上的滑雪者一样,这两个

滑雪者变成了 wo 多能干细胞

8:16 然后在 16 次分裂后变得如此拥挤,

以至于这些细胞必须

分化,所以

它们从山的一侧下山,然后再下山,

当他们选择这些成为骨头时,

他们选择了另一条路 这些

变成了血小板,这些变成了

巨噬细胞,这些变成了 t 细胞,但是

一旦你滑下来就很难

爬起来,

除非你有滑雪缆车,

而这四种化学物质的作用是它们会

带走任何细胞并带走它

回到山上,这样它就可以成为任何身体

部位,当你想到它的

意思时,你可以

用任何一个细胞重建任何有机体的完整副本

,结果证明这很重要,

因为现在你可以 不仅

不拿细胞,你还可以拿人类皮肤

细胞,把它们变成人类干

细胞,然后他们在 10 月份做了什么,

他们把皮肤细胞变成了

干细胞,然后开始把它变成

肝细胞,所以理论上你可以生长

你的任何一个细胞的任何器官

这是第二个实验 如果你可以

复印你的身体 也许你也想

了解一下 你

大约一年半前在 Ted 看到的一件事

就是这个人 他给了一个很棒的

使用麻省理工学院教授进行技术演讲,

但本质上他说的是,你可以

将逆转录病毒带入

小鼠的脑细胞,你可以用蛋白质标记它们,

当你照亮

它们时,你可以绘制出精确的路径,

当老鼠看到感觉触摸时

记住爱,然后你可以拿一根

光缆点亮

一些相同的东西

,顺便说一下,你可以

用两种颜色对其进行成像,这意味着你

可以将这些信息作为二进制

代码直接下载到计算机中,这样

那个井的底线是什么这不是

完全不可想象的,但有一天

你将能够下载你自己的

记忆也许进入一个新的身体,也许

你也可以上传其他人的

记忆,这可能有 j 只有一

两个小的伦理政治道德

影响只是一个想法

这里的问题正在

成为有趣的问题,对于

哲学家来说,对于治理人民对于

经济学家对于科学家来说,因为这些

技术正在快速发展

,当你想到它时,让我

以一个例子结束 大脑是

你今天会看到

巨大进化压力的第一个地方,

因为输入

变得巨大,而且由于

器官的可塑性是大脑,

我们是否有任何证据表明这种情况正在

发生,让我们来看看 以

每千人自闭症事件

为例 这是

2000 年的情况 这是 2002

年 2006 年 2008 年的情况 这是

不到十年的增长,我们仍然不知道

为什么会发生这种情况 我们所知道的

可能是大脑 正在以一种

超反应的增生方式做出反应,并

创造出像这样的个体

,这只是条件之一

在南边,你也有

一些非常聪明的人,他们能

记住他们在生活中看到的一切,他们进行

了麻醉,

人们的胆量得到了拉菲尼亚,那里发生了各种各样

的事情,我们仍然

不明白是怎么回事 以及为什么会

发生这种情况,但您可能

想问的一个问题是,我们是否看到

了大脑

以及我们如何处理数据的快速进化,因为当

您想到有多少数据

进入我们的大脑时,我们正试图将其

作为 一天中有很多数据,就像人们

过去一生中所接受的那样,当你在

思考这个问题时,有四种

理论来解释为什么会发生这种情况

,再加上一系列其他的理论,我

没有一个很好的答案,真的需要

更多关于这个选项的研究是对

快餐的迷恋开始

有一些证据表明肥胖和饮食

与基因

修饰有关,而基因修饰可能会或可能

不会影响婴儿大脑的

工作方式 选项一 作为性感的极客

选择,这些条件非常罕见,

但开始发生的事情是

因为这些极客都

聚集在一起,因为他们在计算机编程方面具有很高的

资格,并且

报酬很高,以及他们在地理上专注于

其他非常注重细节的任务

并找到志同道合的伴侣 所以这

是这些

基因在这些结构中相互增强的一种交配假设

第三个是太多的

信息 我们试图处理

太多的东西 以至于有些人得到了

联觉并且只有巨大的管道和

记住其他人变得

过敏的一切

其他人对各种

心理状况或

对此信息的反应或可能是化学物质的反应的信息量,

但是当您看到某种情况下该数量级的增加时,

要么

您没有正确测量它,要么有

事情发生得很快,它

可能是实时进化的,这是

底部 线我认为我们正在做的是

我们正在作为一个物种过渡,

当史蒂夫柯林斯和

我开始一起

写作时我没有想到这一点

原始人对他或她的

环境

有意识 这是一个原始人开始

直接和有意识地控制

自己的动物植物细菌物种的进化

,我认为这是

一个数量级的变化,

你的孙子或你的曾孙

可能是 物种和你很不一样

非常感谢