A Knowledge Mindset What You Know Comes from Where You Sit

it’s not fair

that’s why i used to tell my dad when i

wouldn’t get what i wanted to get and

when i wasn’t told what i wanted to know

i would scream loudly it’s not fair

my dad would call me say to me well the

fair is not in town

and that’s how it worked in our

relationship and this is also how it

works now in many organizations between

bosses and their director ports

now with many organizations working

remotely it is even more important that

those in the senior seats

share knowledge when people have a

compliment or complaint

is based on their point of view when you

talk to someone you need to consider

their point of view and their knowledge

or perception situation

this is an important aspect of knowledge

management that leaders can forget

the idea of what you know comes from

where you sit is based off of miles law

which states

where you stand depends on where you sit

miles law is a reference of fairness and

bureaucracy

where the point of view and decisions

are made by people based on their

positions

what you know comes from where you sit

refers to perceived fairness of

inclusion

with knowledge the fairness of who knows

what in an organization

and how it affects a person’s ability to

do their job and prosper within the

organization

inefficient knowledge sharing was found

to cause businesses with approximately

18 000 employees a loss of 47 million

dollars per year

and those with 100 000 employees about

265 million dollars

is that fair well a workplace

knowledge and productivity survey

conducted in 2018

reported that workplace productivity

declined due to inefficient knowledge

sharing

this is based on the following employees

had to wait on average of 5 hours each

week to get unique knowledge

from co-workers with 1 in 10 workers

waiting an average of 10 hours each week

employees spent an

average of eight hours searching for

knowledge that they needed from

coworkers

and on average employees reported

spending about six hours each week

duplicating work because they could not

attain the knowledge they needed

inefficient knowledge sharing and with

that and lack of inclusion

affects more than the financial and

productivity bottom line

gallup reported the organizations where

engaging employees through knowledge

management

was taken into consideration had 67

percent less turnover than their

competition

inefficient knowledge sharing affects

employee retention because employees may

not feel included

workplace inclusion factors employ

empowerment as a contributor

but when knowledge sharing does not

occur or occurs only through select

levels of employees

inclusion will not occur inefficient

knowledge sharing and lack of inclusion

also negatively affects

employee advancement it negatively

affects advancement because knowledge is

a tool to give employees a full picture

of work that they are doing

or involved in and that affects their

decisions and recommendations in doing

the work

most importantly it affects the trust

level

in lower level employees they feel based

on the amount of knowledge they are

privy to or rather

kept outside a circle of trust and that

affects

their overall trust if someone does not

feel valued it can result in employee

leading and therefore the organization

loses corporate knowledge

and may increase spending onboarding

training and updating a new hire so

i have three recommendations to help

organizations reduce employee turnover

and increase employee inclusion in terms

of trust

these recommendations are incorporating

knowledge sharing

into your organization’s inclusion

culture core value

to improve inclusion and trust employees

reward knowledge sharing throughout the

organization

through performance reviews and

quarterly recognition to implement

knowledge sharing is more than just a

financial benefit

finally increase organizational team

quizzes

through knowledge now that we are in

various phases of working remotely and

possibly some working remotely

permanently

what you know does come from where you

sit

becomes more of a reality and a

challenge

no the fair is not in town but we can

increase employee trust

and retention while reducing

organizational financial loss

by sharing knowledge at all levels we

are moving towards the same end state

what you know does come from where you

sit

it is not fair now let’s

change and make that a level bench of

inclusion trust and knowledge sharing

thank you

这不公平

这就是为什么我过去常常告诉我爸爸,当

我得不到我想要的东西

时,当我没有被告知我想知道的东西时,

我会大声尖叫,这是不公平的,

我爸爸会打电话给我对我说好

展会不在城里

,这就是它在我们的

关系中的运作方式,这也是

它现在在许多组织中的运作方式,在

老板和他们的主管港口之间

现在有许多组织

远程工作,更重要的是

那些坐在高级席位上的人

分享知识 当人们受到

称赞或抱怨时,

是基于他们的观点 当你

与某人交谈时,你需要考虑

他们的观点以及他们的知识

或感知情况

这是知识管理的一个重要方面

,领导者可能会

忘记你的想法 知道来自

你坐在哪里是基于英里法

,你的立场取决于你坐在哪里

英里法是公平和官僚主义的参考,

其中观点和决定

是由人们根据他们的职位做出的

你所知道的来自你所处的位置

指的是感知到的

包容性

与知识的公平性 谁

知道组织中什么

以及它如何影响一个人

在组织内完成工作和繁荣的能力

效率低下 知识共享被发现

导致拥有约

18000 名员工的企业每年损失 4700 万

美元

,而拥有 100000 名员工的企业每年损失约

2.65 亿

美元,2018 年进行的工作场所

知识和生产力调查

报告称,工作场所生产力

下降是由于 知识共享效率低下

这是基于以下员工

必须平均每周等待 5 小时

才能从同事那里获得独特的知识

,每 10 名员工中就有 1 名员工

每周平均等待 10 小时

员工平均花费

8 小时寻找

他们需要从同事那里得到的知识

和平均员工报告的

支出 每周重复工作 6 小时,

因为他们无法

获得所需的

知识 知识共享效率低下

,并且缺乏包容性

对财务和生产力底线的影响超过了

盖洛普报告的那些考虑

通过知识管理让员工参与的组织

流动率比

竞争对手

低 67% 低效的知识共享会影响

员工保留率,因为员工

可能觉得

工作场所包容性因素不包括在内,因此将

授权作为贡献者使用,

但是当知识共享不

发生或仅通过选定

级别的员工

包容发生时,不会发生低效的

知识共享和 缺乏包容性

也会对

员工的晋升产生负面

影响 它会对晋升产生负面影响,因为知识是

一种工具,可以让员工全面了解

他们正在从事

或参与的工作,并影响他们

在工作中做出的决定和

建议 e 工作

最重要的是,它会影响

他们对较低级别员工的信任程度,这

取决于他们所了解的知识量,

或者更确切地说,它

被排除在信任圈之外,如果有人不觉得受到重视,这

会影响

他们的整体信任,

这可能会导致员工

领导,因此组织

会失去企业知识,

并可能增加入职培训

和更新新员工的支出,因此

我有三项建议可帮助

组织减少员工流动率

并提高员工在信任方面的包容性

这些建议将

知识共享

纳入组织的包容性

文化核心

提高包容性和信任度的价值 员工

通过绩效评估和

季度表彰奖励整个组织的

知识共享 实施知识共享不仅仅是

经济利益

最后通过知识增加组织团队的

测验

现在我们处于工作的

各个阶段 远程

办公,可能还有一些永久远程工作

您所知道的确实来自您

所在的位置

变得更加现实和

挑战

不,展会不在城里,但我们可以

增加员工的信任

和保留,同时通过分享知识来减少

组织的财务损失

我们

正在朝着相同的最终状态迈进

你所知道的确实来自你所在的位置

现在不公平 现在让我们

改变并使其成为

包容信任和知识共享的水平平台

谢谢