Reexamining the remix Lawrence Lessig

I want to talk about what we learn from

conservatives and I’m at a stage in life

where I’m yearning for my old days so I

want to confess to you that when I was a

kid

indeed I was conservative I was a young

Republican a teenage Republic and a

leader in the teenage Republicans indeed

I was the youngest member of any

delegation in the 1980 convention that

elected Ronald Reagan to be the

Republican nominee for president now I

know what you’re thinking you’re

thinking that’s not what the Internet’s

say you’re thinking Wikipedia doesn’t

say this fact and indeed this is just

one of the examples of the junk that

flows across the tubes in these

Internet’s here

Wikipedia reports that this guy this

former congressman from Erie

Pennsylvania was at the age of twenty

one of the youngest people at the

Republican National Convention but it’s

just not true

indeed it drives me so nuts let me just

change this

all right okay speaker lawrence lessig

right okay finally truth will be brought

here okay see right it’s done it’s

almost done okay we’re finished that’s

it please save this great and Wikipedia

is fixed finally okay but no this is

really it besides the point but the

thing I want you to think about when we

think about conservatives not so much

this issue of the 1980 convention the

thing to think about is this they go to

church oh you know I mean a lot of

people go to church I’m not talking

about that only conservatives go to

church and I’m not talking about the god

thing I don’t want to get into that you

know that’s not my point they go to

church by which I mean they do lots of

things for free for each other they hold

potluck dinners indeed they sell books

about potluck dinners they serve food to

poor people they share they give they

give away for free and it’s the very

same people leading Wall Street firms

who on Sunday show up and share and not

only food right these very same people

are strong believers in lots of context

in the limits on the markets they are in

many important places against markets

indeed they like all of us celebrate

this kind of relationship and they’re

very keen that we don’t let money drop

into that relationship else it turns

into something like this they want to

regulate us those conservatives to stop

us from allowing the market to spread in

those places because they understand

there are places for the market and

places where the market should not exist

where we should be free to enjoy the

fellowship

of others they recognize both of these

things have to live together and second

great thing about conservatives they get

a ecology right it was the first great

Republican president of the 20th century

who taught us about environmental

thinking Teddy Roosevelt they first

taught us about ecologies in the context

of natural resources and then they began

to teach us in the context of innovation

economics they understand in that

context free they understand free is an

important essential part of the cultural

ecology as well that’s the thing I want

you to think about that now I know you

don’t believe me really here so here’s

exhibit number one I want to share with

you my latest hero Julian Sanchez a

libertarian who works at the for many

people evil Cato Institute okay so

Julian made this video he’s a terrible

producer of videos but it’s great

content I’m gonna give you a little bit

of it so here he is beginning the way

remix culture seems to be evolving so

what he does is he begins to tell us

about these three

this is fantastic Brad pack remix said

to this which of course spread virally

hugely successful and then two people

from Brooklyn saw it they decided they

wanted to do the same

and then of course people from San

Francisco saw it in San Francisco’s

thought they had to be the same as well

so they’re beautiful but this

libertarian has some important lessons

he wants us to learn from this here’s

lesson number one there’s obviously also

something really deeply great about this

they’re acting in the sense that they’re

emulating the original mash up as a dime

you shot it obviously has a strong eye

and some experience with video editing

but this is also basically just a group

of friends having an authentic social

moment and screwing around together

it should feel familiar and kind of

resonating for anyone who’s had a

sing-along or dance party with a group

of good friends or so that’s importantly

different from the earlier videos we

looked at because here remix isn’t just

about an individual doing something

alone in this basement

it becomes an act of social creativity

and it’s not just that it yields a

different kind of product at the end is

that potentially it changes the way we

relate to each other all of our normal

social interactions become a kind of

invitation to this sort of collective

expression it’s our real social lives

themselves that are transmuted into art

and so that misty criterion draws from

these two points one remix is about

individuals using our shared culture as

a kind of language to communicate

something to an audience stage two

social remix is really about using it to

mediate people’s relationships with each

other

first within each video the brat pack

characters are used as a kind of

template for performing the social

reality of each group but there’s also a

dialogue between the videos where once

the basic structure is established it

becomes a kind of platform for

articulating the similarities and

differences between the groups social

and physical worlds and then it is for

me the critical key to what Julien has

to say copyright policy isn’t just about

how to incentivize the production of a

certain kind of artistic commodity it’s

about what level of control we’re gonna

permit

the exercise over our social realities

social realities that are now inevitably

permeated by pop culture I think it’s

important that we keep these two

different kinds of public goods in mind

if we’re only focused on how to maximize

the supply of one I think we risk

suppressing this different and richer

and in some ways maybe even more

importantly right sphingo point freedom

needs this opportunity to both have the

commercial success of the great

commercial works and the opportunity to

build this different kind of culture and

for that to happen you need ideas like

fair use to be central and protected to

enable this kind of innovation as this

libertarian tells us between these two

creative cultures a commercial and a

sharing culture the point is they he

here gets that culture now my concern is

we Dems too often not so much right

think for example about this great

company in the good old days when this

Republican ran that company their

greatest work was work that built on the

past right all of the great Disney works

were works that took works that were in

the public domain and remixed them or

waited till they entered to the public

domain to remix them to celebrate this

add-on remix creativity indeed Mickey

Mouse himself of course as Steamboat

Willie is a remix of the then very

dominant very popular steamboat bill by

Buster Keaton this man was a remixer

extraordinary he is the celebration and

ideal of exactly this kind of creativity

but then the company passes in through

this dark stage to this Democrat wildly

different this is the mastermind behind

the eventual passage of what we call the

Sonny Bono copyright term extension Act

extending the term of existing

copyrights by 20 years so that no one

could do to Disney what Disney

did to the Brothers Grimm now when we

tried to challenge this going to the

Supreme Court getting the Supreme Court

the bunch of conservatives there if we

could get them to wake up to this to

strike it down

we had the assistance of Nobel Prize

winners including this right-wing Nobel

Prize winner Milton Friedman who said he

would join our brief only if the word

no-brainer was in the brief somewhere

but apparently no brains existed in this

place when Democrats passed and signed

this bill into law now tiny little

quibble of a footnote Sonny Bono you

might say was a Republican but I don’t

buy it this guy is okay our second

example think about this cultural hero

icon on the Left creator of this

character look at the site that he built

Star Wars mashup inviting people to come

and use their creative energy to produce

a new generation of attention towards

this extraordinarily important cultural

icon read the license the license for

these really mixers assigns all of the

rights to the remix back to Lucas the

mash-up is owned by Lucas indeed

anything you add to the mashup music you

might add Lucas has a worldwide

perpetual right to exploit that for free

there is no creator here to be

recognized the Creator doesn’t have any

rights the Creator is a sharecropper in

this story and we should remember who

employed the sharecroppers the Democrats

right so the point is the Republicans

here recognize that there’s a certain

need of ownership or respect for

ownership the respect we should give to

the Creator the remixer the owner the

property owner the copyright owner of

this extraordinarily powerful stuff and

not a generation of sharecroppers now I

think there are lessons we should learn

here lessons about openness our lives

our sharing activities at least in part

even for the head of Goldman Sachs

at least in part and for that sharing

activity to happen we have to have well

protected spaces of fair use that’s

number one number two the psychology of

sharing needs freedom within which to

creates freedom which means without

permission from anyone the ability to

create and number three we need to

respect the Creator the creator of these

remixes through rights that are directly

tied to them now this explains the

right-wing nonprofit Creative Commons

actually it’s not a right-wing profit

but of course let me just tie it here

are the Creative Commons which is

offering auteurs this simple way to mark

their content with the freedoms they

intended to carry so that we go from a

all rights reserved world to a some

rights reserved world so that people can

know the freedoms they have attached to

the content building and creating on the

basis of this creative copyrighted work

these tools that we’ve built enable this

sharing in parts through licenses that

make it clear and a freedom to create

without requiring permission first

because the permission has already been

granted and a respect for the creator

because it builds upon a copyright the

Creator HAP’s

licensed freely and it explains the vast

right-wing conspiracy that’s obviously

developed around these licenses as now

more than three hundred and fifty

million digital objects are out there

licensed freely in this way now that

picture of an ecology of creativity the

picture of an ecology of balanced

creativity is that the ecology of

creativity we have right now well as you

all know not many of us believe we do I

tripped on the reality of this ecology

of creativity just last week I created a

video which was based on a wire side

chat that I had given and I uploaded it

to YouTube I then got this email from

YouTube

weirdly notifying me that there was

content in that owned by the mysterious

W

mg that matched their Content ID so I

didn’t think much about it and then on

Twitter somebody said to me your talk on

YouTube was DMC age was that your

purpose imagining that I had this deep

conspiracy to reveal the obvious flaws

in the DMCA answer no I didn’t even

think about it but then I went to the

site and all of the audio in my site had

been silenced my whole 45 minute video

had been silenced because they were

snippets in that video a video about

fair use that included Warner Music

Group music now interestingly they still

sold ads for that music if you played

the silent video you can still buy the

music but you couldn’t hear anything

because it had been silenced so I did

what the current regime says I must do

to be free to use YouTube to talk about

fair use I went to this site and I had

to answer these questions and then in an

extraordinarily Bart Simpson like

juvenile way you’ve actually got to type

out these words and get them rights to

reassert your freedom to speak and I

felt like I was in third grade again I

will not put tacks on the teachers chair

I will not give tax on

teachers cheer this is absurd it is

outrageous it is extraordinary

perversion of the system of freedom we

should be encouraging and the question I

ask you is who’s fighting it well

interestingly in the last presidential

election who was the number one active

opponents of this system of regulation

in online speech John McCain letter

after letter attacking YouTube’s refusal

to be more respectful of fair use but

they’re extraordinary notice and

takedown system that led his campaign so

many times to be thrown off the internet

now that was a story of me then my good

old days of right-wing lunacy let me

come back to now now when I’m a live a

leftist I’m certainly left-handed so at

least a lefty and I wonder can we on the

Left expect to build this ecology of

freedom now in a world where we know the

extraordinary powerful

influences against it where even icons

of the left like this entertain and push

bills that would effectively ban the

requirement of open access for

government-funded research the president

who has supported a process that

secretly negotiates agreements which

effectively lock us into the insane

system of dense DMCA that we have

adopted and likely lock us down a path

of three strikes you’re out then of

course the rest of the world are

increasingly adopting not a single

example of reform has been produced yet

and we’re not going to see this change

in this system anytime soon so here’s

the lessons of openness that I think we

need to learn openness is a commitment

to a certain set of values we need to

speak of those values the value of

freedom it’s a value of community it’s a

value of the limits in regulation it’s a

value respecting the Creator now if we

can learn those values from

some influences on the right if we can

take them and incorporate them maybe we

could do a little trade we learn those

values on the left and maybe they’ll do

health care or global warming

legislation or something on the right

anyway please join me in teaching these

values thank you very much

我想谈谈我们从保守派那里学到的东西

,我正处于一个

我渴望过去的生活阶段,所以我

想向你承认,当我还是个孩子的时候,

我确实是保守的,我是一个年轻的

共和党人 一个十几岁的共和国和青少年共和党的

领袖确实

我是

1980 年

选举罗纳德·里根

为共和党总统候选人的所有代表团中最年轻的成员现在我

知道你在想什么你在

想那不是 互联网

说你在想维基百科没有

说这个事实,事实上这只是

这些互联网中流经管道的垃圾

的例子之一

维基百科报道这个

来自宾夕法尼亚州伊利的前国会议员

的年龄是 共和党全国代表

大会上最年轻的 21 人,

事实并非如此,

让我发疯了

被带到

这里 好吧 看看 对 它已经完成

几乎完成了 好吧 我们已经完成了 就是

这样 请保存这个很棒 维基

百科终于修复

了 保守派 与其说

是 1980 年大会的这个问题,

不如说是他们去

教堂 哦,你知道我的意思是很多

人去教堂,我不是在

说只有保守派去

教堂,我不是 谈论上帝的

事我不想谈你

知道那不是我的意思他们去

教堂我的意思是他们

为彼此免费做很多事情他们举行

便餐晚餐确实他们出售

有关便餐晚餐的书籍他们 为

他们分享的穷人提供食物,他们

免费赠送,这正是

领导华尔街公司的

人,他们在周日出现并分享,

不仅是食物,这些人

在很多情况下都是坚定的信徒

市场的限制 他们在

许多重要的地方反对市场

确实他们喜欢我们所有人庆祝

这种关系,他们

非常渴望我们不要让钱

落入这种关系,否则它会

变成他们想要的这样的东西

规范我们这些保守派 阻止

我们允许市场在

那些地方传播,因为他们知道

有些地方是市场和

市场不应该存在的

地方,我们应该可以自由地享受

其他人的团契,他们承认这两者

事情必须

共存 保守派的第二个好处 他们得到

了正确的生态 这是 20 世纪第一位伟大的

共和党总统,

他教给我们环境

思想 泰迪罗斯福,他们首先

教给我们自然资源背景下的生态学

,然后他们 开始

在创新经济学的背景下教我们

他们在这种

背景下理解免费他们理解免费是一种

这也是文化生态的重要组成部分,这

也是我想让

你考虑的事情,现在我知道你

不相信我真的在这里所以这里是

第一个展览我想与

你分享我最新的英雄朱利安桑切斯一个

工作的自由主义者 在许多

人邪恶的卡托学院,好吧,所以

朱利安制作了这个视频,他是一个糟糕

的视频制作人,但它的

内容很棒我会给你一点

,所以在这里他开始了

混音文化似乎正在发展的方式,所以

什么 他所做的是他开始告诉

我们这三个

这是很棒的 Brad pack remix

说这个当然传播得

非常成功 然后

来自布鲁克林的两个人看到了他们决定他们

想做同样的事情

然后当然还有来自 San

弗朗西斯科在旧金山的想法中看到了这一点,

他们也必须是一样的,

所以他们很漂亮,但是这位

自由主义者有一些重要的教训,

他希望我们从中吸取教训,这是第一

课 显然,这也是

一件非常棒的事情

,他们的行为是在

模仿原始的混搭作为

你拍摄的一角钱,它显然有很强的眼光

和一些视频编辑经验,

但这也基本上只是一

组 朋友们有一个真实的社交

时刻并一起玩耍

对于任何与一群好朋友一起唱歌或跳舞的人来说,这应该会让人感到熟悉和产生共鸣,

或者这

与我们之前

看过的视频很重要,因为这里是混音

不仅仅是一个

人在这个地下室独自做某事,

它成为一种社会创造力的行为,

不仅仅是它最终产生了

一种不同的产品

,它还可能改变

了我们彼此之间的联系方式。 正常的

社交互动成为

这种集体

表达的一种邀请,是我们真实的社交生活

本身被转化为艺术

,因此m isty 标准

从这两点得出一个混音是关于

个人使用我们共同的文化作为

一种语言

向观众传达某些东西第二阶段

社交混音实际上是关于在每个视频中首先使用它来

调解人们之间的关系

角色被用作一种

模板来表现

每个群体的社会现实,但视频之间也有

对话,

一旦建立了基本结构,它就

成为一种

表达

群体社会

和物理世界之间异同的平台 然后对

我来说,朱利安所说的关键在于

版权政策不仅仅是关于

如何激励某种艺术商品的生产,

而是

关于我们将

允许对我们的社会进行何种程度的控制 现实

现在不可避免地

被流行文化渗透的社会现实 我认为

重要的是我们保持

如果我们只专注于如何最大化

一种公共物品的供应,

记住这两种不同类型的公共物品

伟大

商业作品的商业成功以及

建立这种不同文化的机会,为此

,您需要诸如

合理使用之类的想法作为核心和保护,以

实现这种创新,正如这位

自由主义者告诉我们的这两种

创造性文化之间的一样 商业和

共享文化 关键是他们

现在在这里得到了这种文化 我担心的是

我们民主党人经常不太正确地

考虑例如这家伟大的

公司在那个

共和党人经营这家公司的过去他们

最伟大的工作就是工作

所有伟大的迪斯尼作品都建立在过去的权利之上,这些

作品都是

将公共领域的作品重新混合或

等待直到 l 他们进入公共

领域进行混音,以庆祝这种

附加混音创意确实是

米老鼠本人,当然,因为

威利

汽船是巴斯特·基顿当时非常流行的汽船法案

的混音,这个人是一个非凡的混音师

正是这种创造力的庆祝和理想,

但随后公司通过

这个黑暗的阶段进入了这个完全

不同的民主党人这是

最终通过我们所谓的

Sonny Bono 版权期限延长法案的策划者,该法案

延长了现有版权的期限

到 20 年,这样就没有人

能像现在迪士尼对

格林兄弟所做的那样,当我们

试图向

最高法院提出挑战时

,如果我们

能让他们意识到这一点,就可以让最高法院那里的一群保守派人士

打倒它,

我们得到了诺贝尔奖获得者的帮助,

包括这位右翼

诺贝尔奖获得者米尔顿弗里德曼,他说他

将加入我们的 仅当“

no-brainer”这个词出现在某处时才简短

但当民主党通过并将

该法案签署成为法律时,这个地方显然

没有大脑存在

买它,这家伙没问题 我们的第二个

例子 想想左边的这个文化英雄

图标 这个

角色的创造者看看他建立的网站

星球大战混搭邀请人们来

,利用他们的创造力

来产生新一代对此的关注

非常重要的文化

偶像 阅读许可证

这些真正混音器的许可证将混音的所有

权利分配给卢卡斯

混搭由卢卡斯拥有 事实上,

你添加到混搭音乐中的任何东西你

可能添加卢卡斯拥有全球

永久权利 免费利用

这里没有需要

承认的创造者 创造者没有任何

权利 在

这个故事中,创造者是佃农,我们应该记住他们是谁

欺骗了佃农 民主党人的

权利 所以关键是共和党人

在这里认识到

所有权或

尊重所有权有一定的需要 我们应该尊重

造物主 混音器 所有者

财产所有者 版权所有者

这个非常强大的东西,而

不是 现在是一代佃农 我

认为我们应该

在这里学到一些教训 关于开放我们的生活

我们的分享活动至少

部分是为了高盛的负责人

至少部分是为了让这种分享

活动发生我们必须得到很好的

保护 公平使用的空间

是第一的第二共享的心理

需要自由在其中

创造自由这意味着

未经任何人许可就可以

创造第三我们需要

尊重创造者这些混音的创造

者通过直接

绑定的权利 现在对他们来说,这解释了

右翼非营利组织 Creative Commons

实际上它不是一个 ri 右翼利润,

但当然让我把它绑在这里

是知识共享,它为作者

提供了一种简单的方式来标记

他们的内容与他们

打算携带的自由,这样我们就可以从一个

保留所有权利的世界变成一个

保留一些权利的世界 世界,这样人们就可以

知道他们

对内容的

自由度了

首先

是许可,因为已经

授予许可,并且尊重创作者,

因为它建立在

创作者 HAP

自由许可的版权之上,它解释了

显然

围绕这些许可证发展起来的巨大右翼阴谋,现在

已经超过三亿五

千万

现在,数字对象以这种方式免费获得许可

创意生态的图片 生态

的图片 平衡

创造力的关键在于

我们现在所拥有的创造力生态,你们

都知道,我们中的许多人都不相信我们这样做我

上周刚刚被这种创造力生态的现实绊倒了我制作了一个

基于有线面的视频

我提供的聊天并将其上传

到 YouTube 然后我从 YouTube 收到这封电子邮件,

奇怪地通知我

神秘的

W

mg 拥有的内容与他们的 Content ID 相匹配,所以我

没有多想,然后继续

Twitter有人对我说你在

YouTube上的谈话是DMC时代是你的

目的是想象我有这个深刻的

阴谋来揭示

DMCA中的明显缺陷答案不,我什至没有

考虑过,但后来我去了

网站和所有 我网站上的音频

被静音了 我整个 45 分钟的视频

都被静音了,因为它们

是该视频中的片段 一个关于

合理使用的视频,其中包括华纳音乐

集团

的音乐 您播放

了无声视频,您仍然可以购买

音乐,但您什么也听不到,

因为它已被静音,所以我

按照当前政权的要求做了我必须做的事情

,才能免费使用 YouTube 谈论

合理使用我去了这个网站 我

必须回答这些问题,然后以一种

非常

年轻的巴特辛普森方式,你实际上必须

打出这些词,并让他们有权

重申你的言论自由,我

觉得我又上三年级了,我

不会 给老师的椅子加上大头钉

我不会对

老师的欢呼征税 这是荒谬的

这是令人发指的 这是

对我们应该鼓励的自由制度的严重歪曲

问你的问题是,在上次总统选举中谁在与它作斗争很

有趣

谁是在线演讲

中这种监管系统的头号积极反对者

约翰麦凯恩在一封

接一封的信中攻击 YouTube

拒绝更加尊重合理使用,但

他们非常不

导致他的竞选活动

多次被从互联网上赶走的 tice 和删除系统

现在这是一个关于我的故事然后我

的右翼精神错乱的美好时光让

我回到现在当我是一个活生生的

左翼分子时 我肯定

是左撇子,所以至少是左撇子,我想知道我们

左派能否期望

在一个我们知道反对它的

非凡强大

影响力的世界中建立这种自由生态,甚至

像这样的左派偶像也能娱乐和推动

将有效禁止政府资助研究

开放获取要求的法案

总统支持

秘密谈判协议的过程,这些协议

有效地将我们锁定在

我们采用的密集 DMCA 的疯狂系统中,

并可能将我们锁定

在三 罢工你出局

当然世界其他地方

越来越多地采用

尚未产生任何改革的例子

而且我们不会很快看到

这个系统的这种变化所以她

这是我认为我们

需要学习的开放的教训 开放是对

我们需要

谈论这些价值观的特定价值观的承诺

自由的价值 它是社区的

价值 它是监管限制的价值 它是

尊重的价值 造物主现在,如果我们

能从

右翼的一些影响中学习这些价值观,如果我们

能把它们整合起来,也许我们

可以做一些交易,我们

从左翼学习这些价值观,也许他们会做

医疗保健或全球变暖

立法,或者

无论如何,请和我一起教授这些

价值观,非常感谢