They told me to change my clothes. I changed the law instead.

Transcriber: Millie Jackson
Reviewer: Silvia Monti

I’m Gina, and I’ve lost 23 debit cards.

I don’t mean to, I’m just
an easily distracted person.

I’ve been known to show up
to events on the wrong date,

I always miss my Tube stop,

and I cannot for the life of me
wake up in the morning

without feeling personally attacked.

I’m also young, I’m female,
I’m working class,

and I’m not particularly academic -
I kind of was average in school.

And I think these are all
some of the reasons why

I probably never felt like I could really
‘make a difference’ growing up.

But it turns out,

with long-term things,
I’m actually pretty good,

with big ideas.

I might be the person
who lost 23 debit cards,

but I’m also a law changer.

When I was 25, I founded and ran
the national media and political campaign

to make upskirting illegal.

Thank you.

(Applause) (Cheers)

You may have heard that story by now,

but if you have, it will have been
in clickbaity titles

like ‘I fought the law and won’,
that kind of thing.

The reality of it is,

it is actually the most difficult
and uncomfortable period of my life.

And I would like to take this opportunity
to share that story with you now,

as it actually happened,

without the fierce-feminist
shiny wrapping of it,

but with some of the biggest lessons
we can learn along the way

and for the last time.

In July 2017, I was at a festival called
British Summer Time in Hyde Park.

Me and my sister were
in a crowd of 60,000 people

waiting for The Killers to take the stage,

when a group of guys
started hitting on us.

One of the guys was making
loads of gross jokes

and generally being really weird
and harassing us,

and we asked him to leave us alone
multiple times, but he wouldn’t.

Five minutes later,
I felt them all laughing at me.

One of the guys
was standing in front of me,

so I peered around
to see what he was doing.

He was on his phone,

and he’d been sent a really well-taken
photograph of someone’s crotch

that was taken up their skirt.

I knew it was me straight away.

I grabbed the phone, and I started crying,

and I held it up and was kind
of yelling about what he’d done.

And then a couple of people
in the crowd helped me get away,

and I ran through that crowd
holding his phone,

with him chasing me,
which was literally terrifying.

I managed to get a security guard,
who protected me and called the police.

When the police came,
they separated me and the guy,

and they said this to me,

‘You should be able
to go to a festival at 30 degrees,

wear a skirt, and this not happen to you.’

But they also said,
‘We’ve had a look at the photo.

It shows more than you’d want it to show,
but it’s not a graphic image.

If you’d chosen not to wear knickers,
we could do something about this.

But you did, so you
won’t hear much from us.’

They told the guy to delete the photo,
so my evidence was gone,

and then they told us
to enjoy the rest of our night.

And I tried to,
but I felt humiliated and sad,

and I knew the guys were probably
just carrying on with their night,

having a great time.

I went home, and a few days later
I got a call from the police,

and they told me my case was dropped.

And I swear to God,
when I put that phone down,

something inside me sort of snapped.

I’ve been dealing with sexual harassment
for as long as I can remember,

and I’d been brushing it off,
and I was so over it.

I couldn’t believe that there wasn’t a law
covering this in some way.

So I started to try to look into it.

Everything I read was written
by politicians and law-makers,

academic people who spoke with jargon,

they don’t speak like me.

I didn’t really understand
what they were fully saying.

So I looked into law,

and I thought I’d found
that upskirting was not a sexual offence,

but I thought I must have got it wrong
because I’m not academic.

So I asked a friend of mine who was
a law student to look into it for me.

And she said, ‘You’re right.’

I had found that upskirting,

the act of taking non-consensual photos
or video up someone’s clothing,

was not a sexual offence
in England and Wales,

but it had been in Scotland for 10 years.

We ask a lot from
victims of sexual violence.

We question them,

we hold them to a higher standard
sometimes than we do perpetrators

in the moments after an incident.

But I had done everything asked of me.

I’d got witnesses, I’d kicked up a fuss,
I had a photo, the phone.

I even handed the guy into the law,
and apparently it couldn’t help me.

And this is where we learn
our first lesson:

Women and marginalized genders
who often deal with sexual violence

shut their mouths

because we make it harder
for them when they’re open.

We have to stop acting

like they’re navigating
some simple and perfect system.

They’re not.

They’re navigating one that’s working
against them a lot of the time.

You see, when sexual harassment happens,
there are one of two options.

Number one, you brush it off,
you shut your mouth.

It happens, it is what it is.

Number two, you do something about it,
literally anything.

Because it’s not funny,
it’s not a joke, it’s humiliating,

and someone should do something about it.

I can tell you right now
that I’m good at number one.

Women and marginalized genders
are good at number one.

We’ve been doing number one
for as long as we can remember,

and we are really, really
bored of number one.

Number one, I think,
has affected me more than I know.

Because of number one,

when I watch news stories
about this stuff,

I start crying out of nowhere.

When someone tells me a story
about sexual harassment,

it somehow partly feels like it’s mine
because of number one.

And because of number one,

I have struggled to articulate
this problem for such a long time.

Because I’d shut my mouth about it,
and I didn’t have the language.

I’m frustrated that year after year,
number one seems like our best option.

But what about number two?

OK, well, number two isn’t something
that people like me do really.

Number two is for brave people,
literally amazing people,

people who are in power,
people who didn’t scrape by in school,

people who have one debit card, I’d say.

People who wrote those documents
I struggled to read.

But you see, I couldn’t forget it,
the upskirting thing,

because for me it felt somehow
possible to forget, for instance,

the hand that had been on my bum
on the Tube a year earlier,

because that hand was no longer there -

not easy, but possible.

But I couldn’t forget the upskirting thing
because they still had the photos.

They probably still do now.

It felt impossible for me to forget,
I think, because they did straight away.

I don’t think they even thought
they’d done that much wrong.

And therein lies our problem.

A few days later, while I was at work,

I put up this photo of me
and my sister at the festival

that happened to have
the guys in the background.

I thought, ‘The law can’t help me,
the police can’t help me,

but maybe social media can.’

And I asked people to share it
and identify the guys.

And then Facebook got in contact with me

and told me I’d violated
their community guidelines.

Apparently, me putting this photo up
constituted harassment against the guys,

but them taking photos up the skirt
and sharing them, no.

I was incandescent with rage
at this point.

Every single safety net that was meant
to have caught me hadn’t,

and the one thing I worked in
and had done for years

that was about democracy,
community and human connection -

social media -

had also rejected me.

You remember what I said about a system
that’s working against you?

Everything at this point
is forcing me back to number one,

to brush it off, to forget
about it, ‘it is what it is’.

I think when Facebook censored me,

I actually just got angry enough
that number one stopped being an option.

And I’m not really embarrassed
about the anger either

because here’s our second lesson:

Anger is a very normal response
to having your human rights compromised.

That’s important to say.

We have to stop using it
to delegitimise people,

with ‘angry feminist’
or ‘angry Black woman’,

all of these stereotypes.

People are allowed to be angry
about this stuff.

And we have to hold space for them there.

We have to realise it’s not about us.

I’d been put up with, I don’t know,
being shouted at from cars.

I’d had my bum grabbed in bars.

I had a stalking case for two years
against a guy from school

that ended in nothing.

When I was 19 and I worked
at a rowdy student bar,

a security guard,
who was employed to protect me,

felt my boobs ‘to see
if I was wearing a stab-proof vest’.

I was angry that every woman I know
has dealt with sexual harassment,

and I was angry enough for the first time
that number two became the only option -

to do something about it,
literally anything.

So I started a social media campaign.

I thought, ‘OK, in work,

if I can start a campaign to make people
care about whisky, for instance,

I can do it with something like this
that actually matters.’

I’d launched a petition,
I wrote Facebook ads,

I did editorials,

and that’s when I realised this:

Social media is the single
most important democratising tool

we’ve ever had in social change.

It can be used by anyone,
at any time, for good.

And traditional institutions
really don’t understand it,

so you can use that.

Almost as soon as I started
asking the question,

‘Why is upskirting not a sexual offence?’

people started answering.

My DMs became full of stories.

Young girls telling me about pictures
being taken up their skirts on the Tube.

Trans women telling me that people’s
obsession with their genitals

had lead to them being
victimised with upskirting.

I had messages from teachers

telling me young boys
were coming up with plans

to get pictures of the teachers together.

And I got messages from Japan,

where it is such a problem
that they have redesigned phones

so you can’t turn off
the camera shutter sound.

So women are ‘alerted’
it’s happening to them.

Then I started getting messages from kids.

And they were all coming
from the same place, I recognised -

a school in South London

where the teacher had been upskirting
the kids for months.

They found thousands of photos,
but they couldn’t convict him

because what he did didn’t constitute
a criminal offence under that current law.

These kids who are messaging with me,
pleading with me to do something,

couldn’t even vote.

They have no democratic
voice whatsoever.

But social media gave them
a direct line to me.

And thank God it did

because that was when I realised
this is way bigger than me and my case.

And instead of me
standing up and being like,

‘Someone should do something’
and pointing fingers,

I thought, ‘Alright,
I’ll try and do something.

I don’t know how to do it,
but I’ll try and change the law.

I’ll give it a go because maybe
I’ll make it easier for someone who can.’

Honestly, I genuinely think I just needed
somewhere to put my frustration.

And that makes sense to me now.

Because here’s our next lesson:

Action really is the cure for fear.

With these things, fear and frustration
really fester in you,

but taking an action, even if it’s small,
can metabolise that back into power again.

That’s what it did for me.

The first thing I did
when I thought about changing the law

was I googled, I literally wrote,
‘How does one change the law?’

and nothing came up.

And I realised I was going to have
to figure this out on my own.

I also realised that social media
and shouting about it on there

was great for awareness,
but it wasn’t going to change the law.

I had to get really clever and strategic.

And to do that, I had to be
really honest with myself.

I’m good at campaigning,
I can motivate people,

and I understand this issue
more than anyone, really,

but I don’t really understand politics,
and I don’t really understand the law.

And those are two pretty big
pieces of the puzzle

if you’re going to go into politics
and change the law.

So I needed to find someone who did,

and I had to show them
that I was really serious.

So I went mainstream with the campaign.

I packaged up the numbers
from social media,

and I started talking
to TV producers and editors

showing them there was conversation
happening online.

The first piece of media I did
was Good Morning Britain.

Piers Morgan was sadly not in that week,

but I did get to sit opposite
a female police officer,

who told me that the police had
‘more important things to deal with’

and that I should wear trousers.

At the height of those media appearances,

I used all that publicity,
and I started contacting law firms,

showing them my proven theory on the law
and all the public support I had.

And then three days after I started
that, I found Ryan Whelan,

who was a 29-year-old lawyer.

He was a human rights fanatic,

he was unjaded by the industry,
and he was a complete political nut.

And we got to work together.

We started creating a political strategy
and a media strategy

that complemented each other.

We looked at the Scottish Law,

and he created the new
legislation we needed here.

And then we went and got
the best legal authorities in the UK

to corroborate that and stand behind it.

We did that because it meant
when we went into Parliament,

we were making it
as easy as possible for MPs.

We were just giving them
a solution, not a problem.

We met with MPs from all parties.

That was really important to us.

And that’s because this wasn’t
a Labour issue or a Conservative issue.

It was a human issue.

And that ’s when I learnt this:

Human rights aren’t about party politics.

Party politics is a game, I’ve seen it.

Human rights are about values and morals.

So instead of everything
being left or right,

upskirting being a ‘lefty issue’,

let’s start looking up and down more.

Who is society harder on?
Who is society easier for?

If we start doing that,
we’ll start getting work done.

After months of meetings,

we’d kind of built an army of MPs
in those four walls,

and we tabled a private member’s
bill to change the law.

A year of politics ensued.

That bill was killed and objected to
by an MP called Christopher Chope,

who, when I asked him why,
told me, and I quote, ‘He hadn’t read it.’

He said he objected on principle,
but that was disproved.

If you ask me, he saw this as trivial -

a lot of people do.

And he also didn’t like the young girl
coming in and getting a bill through,

when he’s tabled 47 of his own.

That’s politics.

There are good people in there, though.

The next day, me and Ryan met
with the Justice Minister, Lucy Frazer,

and we tabled a government bill
that couldn’t be objected to by MPs.

We saw that bill through for a year -

a year that I was fraught with nerves

that this thing we’d almost done
might fall at the last hurdle.

But thankfully, January 2019 came,

and me, and my family, and Ryan

squeezed in to the gallery
at the House of Lords,

and we watched them
pass our law unamended,

practically as we created it.

And that’s the kind of law you get

when it’s driven by someone
who has lived the problem.

(Cheers)

Thanks.

(Applause)

Then I went to the pub,
and I drank my weight in red wine,

and I cried a lot.

And then I danced to ’90s pop,
and I ate pizza with my mum

because that’s survivors deserve.

(Applause)

In the eight months
after we outlawed upskirting,

there had been one report to police
almost every single day.

We prosecuted 10 men by Christmas.

One was a convicted paedophile
who got two years in prison.

Another was a man who was seen filming
under a 16-year-old girl’s skirt

at a supermarket,

and when police arrested him, they found
250,000 indecent images of children.

This law isn’t catching upskirters.

It’s catching sexual offenders,
predators, paedophiles.

And that’s because of this next lesson:

All misogyny and sexual
violence is connected.

Therefore, all of it is the problem,
none of it is trivial.

We have to remember that.

The coverage that followed
the law change was lovely.

It was really powerful and positive.

And I needed that,
we needed that, I think.

It felt good to have someone
who took on the establishment,

who was normal and won.

But I started to feel weird

because the two years campaigning
wasn’t actually like that.

This was what campaigning was like.

And I will cry, but it’s OK

because not crying
isn’t about power anymore.

You can still be powerful and cry.

And I got online abuse, rape threats,
slut-shaming for two years.

I still get them now.

And I want you to read these

as if you’re reading them
about someone you love.

Because -

(Sniffs)

We have to stop calling them trolls
because they’re not.

They’re the people who work
in coffee shops that serve you coffee.

They work in your offices,
they’re everywhere.

They’re people who are so angry
about a woman standing up for herself

that they will threaten her with rape.

And there’s a lot of them.

And I know you don’t want to hear this
because we never do,

but they’re all guys.

(Cries)

No doubt when this video goes up
on YouTube, I’ll get more of them.

And among the nice comments,
the supportive ones - because there are -

and the hard ones,

there will be one phrase
that comes up again and again.

It’s not the scariest I’ve dealt with,

but it is the most effective
at derailing this important conversation.

It will say, ‘Not all men.’

And to that I’ll say this,

‘No, not all men, but too many.’

Too many men, for some reason,

feel entitled to women
and marginalized genders' bodies.

Too many men, whether
through action or inaction,

are perpetuating a culture of sexism

that breeds inequality
and that leads to violence.

And if you want to use
the phrase ‘Not all men’,

how about we use it like this?

‘Not all men are calling out their friends

when he says something to a woman
he would never say to a guy.

Not all men are looking up these phrases,

learning what rape culture really is,
how misogyny really operates.

And no, not all men are perpetrators,
of course they’re not.

But all the ones who aren’t
should be solving this with us.

Because maybe if they were,
we’d be living in a society

where when I talk to guys
or male politicians about sexual violence,

they want to solve it with me

more than they want to prove
that they’re not the problem.

Maybe if we were living in that world,

when someone upskirts me
and takes photos without my consent,

I don’t have to almost lose it,

creating a law that should
have already been there for me.’

Because here’s the thing.

When good men do engage with this work,

when they really want to solve this,
and they meaningfully engage, it works.

Without Ryan as my ally,

demanding a seat for me in Parliament,
amplifying my voice, listening to me -

the law wouldn’t have changed.

And there are good men
that I know and love

reading the books on gender,
feminism, racism.

They’re doing the work,
they’re going to the events and listening.

They’re not waiting for a woman
to explain this stuff to them.

But from where I stand, there’s too few.

And we need more of you.

And that brings us onto our final
and most important lesson:

Communities that are oppressed
should not be left to dismantle

the thing that’s been built against them.

You have to listen to your privilege,
learn about it and use it

and assist them in that fight.

Look, I know listening to this is heavy,
I get it, I’m tired too.

But I’m also positive,
and I’m strong like you are.

And I genuinely believe we can solve this.

Every day in this work
I get to see amazing people

who are pushing to make
the world a better place.

I see it all the time.

Hate and intolerance
are very loud, they scream.

But good people, compassionate people,
are quiet and humble.

They’re getting on with the work.

You might not hear them,
but they’re there.

And yes, there may always be
a level of inequality,

but we can shorten those
peaks and troughs if we want to.

That’s on me, that’s on all of you.

So when you leave this room tonight,

have a think about
where you hold privilege -

it might be in your job,

as a parent, as a teacher,
or just in the colour of your skin -

and start this work now.

Stop laughing at the jokes,
buy the book, go to the event,

diversify your social feeds,
ask the questions.

Sympathy is soothing,
but it doesn’t go far enough.

Action does.

And listen, you’ll get things wrong.

We all do, I’ve had some clangers.

But it’s not about perfection,
it’s about progress,

it’s about doing it
because it’s the right thing to do.

We are so done with waiting for society
to ‘change things’ for us.

We literally are society.

And let’s be honest,

if someone who’s lost
23 debit cards can change a law,

then I feel like you can do something too.

(Laughter)

Thank you very much,
I’ve been Gina Martin.

(Applause) (Cheers)

抄写员:Millie Jackson
审阅者:Silvia Monti

我是 Gina,我丢失了 23 张借记卡。

我不是故意的,我只是
一个容易分心的人。

众所周知,我会
在错误的日期参加活动,

我总是想念我的地铁站,

而且我一生都无法
在早上醒来

而不感到受到人身攻击。

我也很年轻,我是女性,
我是工人阶级,

而且我不是特别学术——
我在学校的表现一般。

而且我认为这些
都是为什么

我可能从未觉得自己
在成长过程中真正能够“有所作为”的部分原因。

但事实证明,

在长期的事情上,
我其实很不错,

有很大的想法。

我可能是
丢了 23 张借记卡的人,

但我也是一个法律改变者。

当我 25 岁时,我创立并开展
了全国媒体和政治运动,

以使掀裙成为非法。

谢谢你。

(掌声)(欢呼声)

你现在可能已经听过这个故事了,

但如果你听过,那肯定会出现

诸如“我与法律作斗争并获胜”
之类的点击率标题中。

现实是,

这实际上
是我一生中最困难和最不舒服的时期。

我想借此机会
现在与您分享这个故事,

因为它确实发生了,

没有激烈的女权主义
闪亮包装,

但有一些
我们可以在此过程中学到的最重要的教训

,也是最后一次。

2017 年 7 月,我在海德公园参加了一个名为
英国夏令时的节日。 当一群人开始攻击我们时,

我和我姐姐
在 60,000 人中

等待 The Killers 登台

其中一个人
开了很多严重的笑话,

而且通常很奇怪
并骚扰我们

,我们多次要求他不要管我们
,但他不会。

五分钟后,
我感到他们都在嘲笑我。

其中一个
人站在我面前,

所以我四处张望
,看看他在做什么。

他正在打电话

,他收到了一张拍得很好的
照片,照片是某人的

胯部被他们的裙子占据。

我马上就知道是我。

我抓起电话,开始哭泣

,我举起它,
对他的所作所为大喊大叫。

然后
人群中的几个人帮助我离开

,我
拿着他的手机跑过人群

,他追着我,
这真的很可怕。

我设法找到了一名保安,
他保护了我并报了警。

警察来的时候,
把我和那家伙分开了

,他们对我说,

‘你应该可以
30度去参加一个节日,

穿裙子,这不会发生在你身上。

但他们也说,
‘我们看过照片。

它显示的内容超出了您的预期,
但它不是图形图像。

如果你选择不穿短裤,
我们可以做点什么。

但你做到了,所以你
不会听到我们太多消息。

他们告诉那个人删除照片,
所以我的证据消失了,

然后他们告诉
我们享受剩下的夜晚。

我试着这样做,
但我感到羞辱和悲伤

,我知道这些家伙可能
只是在继续他们的夜晚,

玩得很开心。

我回家了,几天后
我接到警察的电话

,他们告诉我我的案子被撤销了。

我向上帝发誓,
当我放下电话时,

我内心的某种东西突然断裂了。

从我
记事起,我就一直在处理性骚扰问题,

而且我一直对此置之不理,而且我已经受够
了。

我无法相信没有
以某种方式涵盖这一点的法律。

所以我开始尝试研究它。

我读到的所有东西都是
政治家和立法者写的

,他们用行话说话,

他们说话不像我。

我真的不
明白他们在说什么。

所以我研究了法律

,我认为我
发现掀裙并不是一种性犯罪,

但我想我一定是搞错了,
因为我不是学业的。

所以我请了我的
一个法律系学生朋友帮我调查一下。

她说,“你是对的。”

我发现在英格兰和威尔士拍裙底,

即在未经同意的情况下拍摄
或拍摄某人的衣服

的行为不是性犯罪

但它在苏格兰已经存在了 10 年。

我们向性暴力受害者提出了很多要求

我们质疑他们,有时

我们对他们的要求
比我们

在事件发生后的那一刻对肇事者的标准更高。

但我已经完成了要求我做的一切。

我有证人,我大惊小怪,
我有一张照片,电话。

我什至把这家伙交给了法律
,显然这对我没有帮助。

这就是我们学到
的第一课:

经常处理性暴力的女性和边缘化的性别会

闭嘴,

因为
当她们敞开心扉时,我们会让她们变得更难。

我们必须停止表现得

好像他们正在浏览
一些简单而完美的系统。

他们不是。

他们正在导航
一个很多时候对他们不利的东西。

你看,当性骚扰发生时,
有两种选择之一。

第一,你把它刷掉,
你闭上嘴。

它发生了,它就是这样。

第二,你做一些事情,
实际上任何事情。

因为这不好笑
,也不是玩笑,是羞辱

,应该有人为此做点什么。

我现在可以告诉你
,我擅长第一。

女性和边缘化的
性别擅长排名第一。

从我们
记事起,我们就一直在做第一,

而我们真的,真的
厌倦了第一。

第一,我认为,
对我的影响比我知道的要大。

因为第一,

当我看到
关于这些东西的新闻报道时,

我会突然开始哭泣。

当有人告诉我一个
关于性骚扰的故事时,

不知何故,它在某种程度上就像是我的,
因为它是第一位的。

因为第一,

我一直在努力阐明
这个问题。

因为我对它闭上了嘴,
而且我没有语言。

年复一年,我很沮丧,
第一似乎是我们最好的选择。

但是第二个呢?

好吧,好吧,第二不是
像我这样的人真正做的事情。

第二个是勇敢的人,
真正了不起的

人,掌权的
人,在学校没有勉强过活的

人,拥有一张借记卡的人,我想说。

写这些文件的人
我很难阅读。

但是你看,我无法忘记它
,掀裙的事情,

因为对我来说,我感觉
有可能忘记,例如,

一年前在地铁上放在我屁股上的

那只手,因为那只手已经不在了 -

不容易,但可能。

但我不能忘记掀裙的事情,
因为他们仍然有照片。

他们现在可能仍然这样做。

我觉得我不可能忘记
,因为他们马上就忘记了。

我不认为他们甚至认为
他们做错了那么多。

这就是我们的问题。

几天后,当我在工作时,

我把这张我
和我姐姐在电影节


的照片贴在了背景中。

我想,“法律帮不了我
,警察帮不了我,

但也许社交媒体可以。”

我要求人们分享它
并识别这些人。

然后 Facebook 联系了我

,告诉我我违反了
他们的社区准则。

很明显,我把这张照片放上去
对那些家伙构成了骚扰,

但他们把照片拍到裙子
上分享了,不。

我此时怒火中烧

每一个本
应抓住我的安全网都没有,

而我多年来一直在做的一

件事是关于民主、
社区和人际关系——

社交媒体——

也拒绝了我。

你还记得我说过一个
对你不利的系统吗?

在这一点上的一切都在
迫使我回到第一,

把它刷掉,
忘记它,“它就是这样”。

我认为当 Facebook 审查我时,

我实际上只是生气到
让第一不再是一个选项。

我对愤怒也不是很尴尬

因为这是我们的第二课:

愤怒是
对人权受到损害的一种非常正常的反应。

这很重要。

我们必须停止

用“愤怒的女权主义者”
或“愤怒的黑人女性”

这些刻板印象来使人们失去合法性。

人们可以
对这些东西生气。

我们必须在那里为他们留出空间。

我们必须意识到这与我们无关。

我已经忍受了,我不知道,
被车里的人大喊大叫。

我的屁股在酒吧里被抓过。

我有一个针对学校里的一个人的两年跟踪案

,结果一无所获。

当我 19 岁时,我
在一家吵闹的学生酒吧工作时,

一名受雇保护我的保安

摸我的胸部,“看
我是否穿着防刺背心”。

我很生气我认识的每个女人
都处理过性骚扰

,我第一次生气
到第二个成为唯一的选择——

对此做点什么,
实际上任何事情。

所以我开始了社交媒体活动。

我想,‘好吧,在工作中,

如果我可以发起一场让人们
关心威士忌的活动,例如,

我可以用这样真正重要的东西来做到这一点

我发起了请愿
,写了 Facebook 广告,写

了社论

,那时我才意识到:

社交媒体是

我们在社会变革中拥有的最重要的民主化工具。

任何人都可以在任何时候永久使用它

而传统机构
真的不理解它,

所以你可以使用它。

几乎就在我开始
问这个问题时,

“为什么掀裙不是性犯罪?”

人们开始回答。

我的 DM 充满了故事。

年轻女孩告诉我
关于在地铁上拍她们裙子的照片。

跨性别女人告诉我,人们
对生殖器

的痴迷导致他们
成为裙底裙的受害者。

我收到了老师们的消息,

告诉我小男孩
们正在

想办法让老师们一起拍照。

我收到了来自日本的消息

,他们重新设计了手机,

让你无法
关闭相机快门声音。

所以女性会“警觉”
它正在发生在她们身上。

然后我开始收到孩子们的消息。

我认出他们都来自同一个地方——

伦敦南部的一所学校,

那里的老师
几个月来一直在给孩子们穿裙子。

他们找到了数千张照片,
但他们无法对他定罪,

因为
根据现行法律,他的所作所为不构成刑事犯罪。

这些和我发信息,
恳求我做点什么的孩子,

甚至不能投票。

他们没有任何民主的
声音。

但是社交媒体给了他们
一条直接联系我的电话。

感谢上帝,它做到了,

因为那时我意识到
这比我和我的情况要大得多。

而不是我站起来说,

“有人应该做点什么”
然后指指点点,

我想,“好吧,
我会尝试做点什么。

我不知道该怎么做,
但我会尝试修改法律。

我会试一试,因为也许
我会让有能力的人更容易。

老实说,我真的认为我只是需要一个
地方来表达我的沮丧。

现在这对我来说很有意义。

因为这是我们的下一课:

行动真的是治疗恐惧的良药。

有了这些东西,恐惧和
挫败感真的会在你心中恶化,

但采取行动,即使是很小的,
也可以将其重新代谢成力量。

这就是它为我所做的。

当我想到改变法律时,

我做的第一件事就是在谷歌上搜索,我真的写道,
“一个人如何改变法律?”

什么也没发生。

我意识到我将不得不
自己解决这个问题。

我也意识到社交媒体
和在那里大喊大叫

有助于提高认识,
但这不会改变法律。

我必须变得非常聪明和战略。

为了做到这一点,我必须
对自己非常诚实。

我擅长竞选,
我可以激励人们

,我
比任何人都更了解这个问题,真的,

但我并不真正了解政治
,我并不真正了解法律。

如果您要涉足政治
并修改法律,那么这就是两个相当大的难题。

所以我需要找到一个这样做的人

,我必须向他们
表明我是认真的。

所以我在竞选中成为了主流。

我将社交媒体上的数据打包

然后开始
与电视制作人和编辑交谈,

向他们展示
在线上发生的对话。

我做的第一条媒体
是早安英国。

遗憾的是,皮尔斯·摩根没有在那周,

但我确实坐在
了一位女警察对面,

她告诉我警察有
“更重要的事情要处理”

,我应该穿裤子。

在那些媒体露面的高峰期,

我利用了所有的宣传
,我开始联系律师事务所,

向他们展示我经过验证的法律理论
以及我所拥有的所有公众支持。

然后在我开始
这样做三天后,我找到

了 29 岁的律师 Ryan Whelan。

他是一个人权狂热者,

他对这个行业不厌其烦,他是一个彻头彻尾的
政治疯子。

我们必须一起工作。

我们开始制定相互补充的政治战略
和媒体战略

我们查看了苏格兰法律

,他制定了
我们需要的新立法。

然后我们去找
英国最好的法律机构

来证实这一点并支持它。

我们这样做是因为这意味着
当我们进入议会时,

我们
让国会议员尽可能轻松。

我们只是给他们
一个解决方案,而不是一个问题。

我们会见了各方议员。

这对我们来说真的很重要。

那是因为这
不是工党问题或保守党问题。

这是一个人的问题。

那时我才知道:

人权与政党政治无关。

政党政治是一场游戏,我见过。

人权是关于价值观和道德的。

因此,与其说一切
都是左或右,

不如说掀裙是一个“左撇子问题”,

让我们开始更多地向上和向下看。

社会对谁更严厉?
社会对谁更容易?

如果我们开始这样做,
我们将开始完成工作。

经过几个月的会议,

我们在这四堵墙上建立了一支国会议员大军

,我们提出了一个私人议员的
法案来修改法律。

一年的政治随之而来。

该法案
被一位名叫克里斯托弗乔普的议员否决并反对

,当我问他为什么时,他
告诉我,我引用,“他没有读过它。”

他说他原则上反对,
但这是不成立的。

如果你问我,他认为这是微不足道的

——很多人都这样做。

而且他也不喜欢那个年轻女孩
进来并

通过他自己的47张账单。

这就是政治。

不过里面还是有好人的。

第二天,我和瑞恩
会见了司法部长露西弗雷泽

,我们提出了
一项不能被国会议员反对的政府法案。

我们看到该法案通过了一年——

这一年我非常紧张

,我们几乎完成的这件事
可能会在最后一道关卡中落空。

但值得庆幸的是,2019 年 1 月来了

,我、我的家人和瑞恩

挤进了上议院的画廊

,我们看着他们
未经修改地通过了我们的法律,

实际上是在我们创建它的时候。

当它由经历过问题的人推动时,这就是你得到的那种法律

(欢呼声)

谢谢。

(鼓掌)

然后我去酒吧,
喝了我体重的红酒

,哭得很厉害。

然后我跳着 90 年代流行音乐跳舞
,我和妈妈一起吃披萨,

因为那是幸存者应得的。

(掌声)


我们取缔裙楼后的八个月里,

几乎每天都有一个人报警。

我们在圣诞节前起诉了 10 名男子。

一个是被定罪的恋童癖
者,被判入狱两年。

另一个是一名男子,他在一家超市看到
一名 16 岁女孩的裙子下拍摄

,当警察逮捕他时,他们发现了
250,000 张儿童的不雅照片。

这条法律不追赶裙底裤。

它正在抓捕性犯罪者、
掠食者、恋童癖者。

那是因为下一课:

所有厌女症和性
暴力都是相互关联的。

因此,这一切都是问题,
没有一件是微不足道的。

我们必须记住这一点。

法律变更后的报道很可爱。

它真的很强大而且很积极。

我需要那个,
我们需要那个,我想。

有一个
人接手这个机构,

他很正常,而且赢了,感觉很好。

但我开始感到奇怪,

因为两年的竞选活动
实际上并不是那样的。

这就是竞选活动的样子。

我会哭,但没关系,

因为
不再哭与权力无关。

你仍然可以强大而哭泣。

我在网上受到了两年的虐待、强奸威胁、
荡妇羞辱。

我现在仍然得到它们。

我希望您阅读这些内容

,就好像您正在阅读
有关您所爱的人的内容一样。

因为 -

(嗅探)

我们必须停止称他们为巨魔,
因为他们不是。

他们是在
为您提供咖啡的咖啡店工作的人。

他们在您的办公室工作,
无处不在。

他们是
对一个为自己挺身而出的女人感到非常愤怒的人

,他们会用强奸威胁她。

而且还有很多。

我知道你不想听到这个,
因为我们从不这样做,

但他们都是男人。

(哭)

毫无疑问,当这个视频出现
在 YouTube 上时,我会得到更多。

在好的评论中
,支持的评论——因为有——

和严厉的评论,

会有一个
短语会一次又一次地出现。

这不是我处理过的最可怕的事情,

但它是最有效
地破坏这一重要对话的方式。

它会说,“不是所有的男人。”

对此我会说,

‘不,不是所有的男人,但太多了。

出于某种原因,太多的男人

觉得有权获得女性
和被边缘化的性别的身体。

太多的男人,无论是
通过行动还是不行动,

都在延续

一种滋生不平等
并导致暴力的性别歧视文化。

如果你想
用“不是所有的男人”这个词,

我们这样用怎么样?

当他对一个女人说一些
他永远不会对一个男人说的话时,并不是所有的男人都在呼唤他们的朋友。

并非所有男人都在查找这些短语,

了解强奸文化的真正含义
,厌女症的真正运作方式。

不,不是所有的男人都是肇事者
,他们当然不是。

但是所有不
应该和我们一起解决这个问题的人。

因为如果他们是的话,
我们会生活在一个社会

中,当我与男性
或男性政客谈论性暴力时,

他们更想和我一起解决问题,而

不是想
证明他们不是问题所在。

也许如果我们生活在那个世界里,

当有人
在未经我同意的情况下掀起我的裙子并拍照时,

我不必几乎失去它,

创造一个本应
为我存在的法律。

因为事情就是这样。

当好人确实参与这项工作时,

当他们真的想解决这个问题
并且他们有意义地参与时,它就会起作用。

如果没有瑞恩作为我的盟友,

在议会中为我争取一个席位,
放大我的声音,倾听我的声音

——法律就不会改变。

我认识并喜欢

阅读关于性别、
女权主义、种族主义的书籍的好男人。

他们在做工作,
他们要去参加活动并倾听。

他们不是在等待一个女人
向他们解释这些东西。

但从我的立场来看,太少了。

我们需要更多的你们。

这给我们带来了最后
也是最重要的一课:不应该

让受压迫的社区
拆除

反对他们的东西。

你必须倾听你的特权,
了解它并使用它

,并在这场斗争中帮助他们。

听着,我知道听这个很重,
我明白了,我也累了。

但我也很积极
,我和你一样坚强。

我真的相信我们可以解决这个问题。

每天在这项工作中,
我都能看到令人惊叹的

人们正在努力
让世界变得更美好。

我总是能看到它。

仇恨和不容忍
非常响亮,他们尖叫。

但善良的人,富有同情心的人
,安静而谦逊。

他们正在继续工作。

你可能听不到它们,
但它们就在那里。

是的,可能总会存在
一定程度的不平等,

但如果我们愿意,我们可以缩短这些
高峰和低谷。

那是我的,那是你们所有人的。

所以当你今晚离开这个房间时

,想一想
你的特权在哪里

——可能是在你的工作中,

作为父母,作为老师,
或者只是在你的肤色中——

现在就开始这项工作。

停止嘲笑笑话,
买书,参加活动,

多样化你的社交信息,
提出问题。

同情是舒缓的,
但还远远不够。

行动可以。

听着,你会弄错的。

我们都这样做,我有一些叮当声。

但这不是关于完美,
而是关于进步

,是关于这样做,
因为这是正确的做法。

我们已经完成了等待社会
为我们“改变事物”的事情。

我们实际上就是社会。

老实说,

如果丢失了
23 张借记卡的人可以改变法律,

那么我觉得你也可以做点什么。

(笑声)

非常感谢,
我一直是吉娜·马丁。

(掌声)(欢呼)