How to lead in a crisis The Way We Work a TED series

Transcriber: TED Translators Admin
Reviewer: Ivana Korom

We think of a great leader

as the unwavering captain
who guides us forward

through challenge and complexity.

Confident, unwavering leaders,

armed with data and past experience

have long been celebrated
in business and politics alike.

But sometimes and certainly now,

a crisis comes along
that is so new and so urgent

that it upends everything
we thought we knew.

[The Way We Work]

[Made possible with
the support of Dropbox]

One thing we know for sure

is that more upheavals are coming.

In a completely interconnected world

a single political uprising,

a viral video, a distant tsunami,

or a tiny virus can send
shock waves around the world.

Upheaval creates fear,

and in the midst of it
people crave security,

which can incline leaders

toward the usual tropes of strength,
confidence, constancy,

but it won’t work.

We have to flip the leadership playbook.

First, this type of leadership requires

communicating with transparency,
communicating often.

So how can leaders lead
when there is so little certainty,

so little clarity?

Whether you are a CEO,
a prime minister, a middle manager

or even a head of school,

upheaval means you have
to ramp up the humility.

When what you know is limited,

pretending that you have
the answers isn’t helpful.

Amidst upheaval, leaders
must share what they know

and admit what they don’t know.

Paradoxically, that honesty creates
more psychological safety for people,

not less.

For example when the pandemic
devastated the airline industry

virtually overnight,

CEO of Delta Airlines Ed Bastian

ramped up employee communication

despite having so little clarity

about the path ahead,
facing truly dire results.

At one point in 2020,

losing over a hundred
million dollars a day,

it would have been far easier for Bastian

to wait for more information
before taking action,

but effective leaders during upheaval

don’t hide in the shadows.

In fact, as Bastian put it,

it is far more important to communicate

when you don’t have the answers
than when you do.

Second, act with urgency
despite incomplete information.

Admitting you don’t have the answers

does not mean avoiding action.

While it’s natural to want
more information,

fast action is often the only way
to get more information.

Worse, inaction leaves people
feeling lost and unstable.

When New Zealand
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern

laid out a four level
alert system very early

in the COVID-19 crisis,

she lacked information
with which to set the level.

Despite lacking answers,
she did not wait to communicate

about the threat with the nation.

At first she set the level at two,

only to change it to four
two days later as cases rose.

That triggered a national lockdown,

which no doubt saved countless lives.

Later, when cases began to dissipate,

she made subsequent decisions

reflecting that new information.

Third, leaders must hold
purpose and values steady,

even as goals and situations change.

Values can be your guiding light

when everything else is up in the air.

If you care about customer experience,

don’t let go of that in times of upheaval.

If a core value is health and safety,

put that at the center
of every decision you make.

Now doing this requires
being very transparent

about what your values are,

and in this way, your steadfastness shows

not in your plans but in your values.

Prime Minister Ardern’s
clear purpose all along

was protecting human life.

Even as the immediate goal
shifted from preventing illness

to preparing health systems

and ultimately to bolstering the economy.

And finally, give power away.

Our instincts are to hold
even more tightly

to control in times of upheaval,
but it backfires.

One of the most effective
ways to show leadership,

if counterintuitive,

is to share power with those around you.

Doing this requires asking for help,

being clear that you can’t do it alone.

This also provokes innovation

while giving people a sense of meaning.

Nothing is worse in a crisis

than feeling like there’s
nothing you can do to help.

We follow this new kind
of leader through upheaval,

because we have confidence

not in their map but in their compass.

We believe they’ve chosen
the right direction

given the current information,

and that they will keep updating.

Most of all, we trust them

and we want to help them
in finding and refinding

the path forward.

抄写员:TED Translators Admin
Reviewer:Ivana Korom

我们认为伟大的领导

者是坚定不移的队长
,他引导

我们克服挑战和复杂性。

自信、坚定不移的领导人,

拥有数据和过去的经验

,长期以来一直
在商界和政界受到赞誉。

但有时,当然现在,

一场
如此新的、如此紧迫的危机来了

,它颠覆了
我们认为我们所知道的一切。

[我们的工作方式]

[
在 Dropbox 的支持下成为可能]

我们确定的一件事

是,更多的动荡即将到来。

在一个完全相互关联的世界中,

一个单一的政治起义、

一个病毒视频、一场遥远的海啸

或一个微小的病毒都可以
在世界范围内引发冲击波。

剧变会制造恐惧,

而人们在其中
渴望安全感,

这会使领导者

倾向于通常的力量、
自信、坚定不移的比喻,

但这是行不通的。

我们必须翻转领导力手册。

首先,这种类型的领导需要

以透明的方式进行
沟通,经常进行沟通。

那么,
当确定性如此之低、清晰度如此之低时,领导者如何领导

无论你是首席执行官
、总理、中层管理人员

,甚至是学校的校长,

剧变意味着你必须
提高谦逊。

当你知道的东西有限时,

假装你
有答案是没有帮助的。

在剧变中,领导者
必须分享他们所知道的

并承认他们不知道的。

矛盾的是,诚实
为人们创造了更多的心理安全,

而不是更少。

例如,当大流行几乎在一夜之间
摧毁了航空业时

,达美航空公司的首席执行官埃德巴斯蒂安

加强了员工沟通,

尽管

对未来的道路不太清楚,但
面临着真正可怕的结果。

在 2020 年的某个时刻,每天

损失超过
一亿美元

,巴斯蒂安在采取行动

之前等待更多信息会容易得多

但在动荡期间有效的领导者

不会隐藏在阴影中。

事实上,正如巴斯蒂安所说,

当你没有答案
时,沟通比你有答案时要重要得多。

其次,
尽管信息不完整,但仍要紧急行动。

承认你没有答案

并不意味着避免采取行动。

虽然想要更多信息是很自然的
,但

快速行动通常是
获得更多信息的唯一途径。

更糟糕的是,不作为会让人们
感到迷失和不稳定。

当新西兰
总理 Jacinda Ardern 在 COVID-19 危机初期

制定了四级
警报系统时

她缺乏
设定级别的信息。

尽管缺乏答案,
但她并没有等待

与国家就威胁进行沟通。

起初,她将级别设置为 2,


两天后随着病例的增加将其更改为 4。

这引发了全国封锁,

这无疑挽救了无数生命。

后来,当案件开始消散时,

她做出了

反映新信息的后续决定。

第三,即使目标和情况发生变化,领导者也必须保持
目标和价值观的稳定

。 当其他一切都

悬而未决时,价值观可以成为您的指路明灯

如果您关心客户体验,

请不要在动荡时期放弃这一点。

如果核心价值是健康和安全,

那就把它放在
你做出的每一个决定的中心。

现在这样做需要

对你的价值观非常透明

,这样,你的坚定不移

不会表现在你的计划中,而是表现在你的价值观中。

Ardern 总理的
明确目的一直

是保护人类生命。

即使近期目标
从预防疾病转移

到准备卫生系统

并最终转向提振经济。

最后,放弃权力。

我们的本能是

在动荡时期更加紧握以控制,
但它适得其反。 如果违反直觉

,最有效的展示领导力的方法之一

就是与周围的人分享权力。

这样做需要寻求帮助,

要清楚你不能独自完成。

这也激发了创新,

同时赋予人们意义感。

在危机中没有什么

比感觉
自己无能为力更糟糕的了。

我们
在动荡中跟随这种新型领导者,

因为我们

不是对他们的地图而是对他们的指南针有信心。

我们相信他们根据当前信息选择
了正确的方向

并且他们会不断更新。

最重要的是,我们信任他们

,我们希望帮助
他们找到并重新找到

前进的道路。