The Strength in Weak Leaders

[Music]

a little over 30 years ago

i went off to college wanting to study

leadership but because i also grew up

the son

of an air force officer i grew up

wanting to become a pilot

so i chose the naval academy it was a

good choice

this place takes leadership so seriously

that they even have an

entire building called loose hall

dedicated just to the study of

leadership

but at some at some point i became

concerned

that i wasn’t going to find enough

leadership

in the cockpit of a single-seat aircraft

so at that point i gave up my childhood

dream

and i decided instead to become a

practitioner of leadership

in the navy seal teams and i became a

task unit commander deployed in the wars

after 9 11.

and it was then deployed to those wars

that i started to confront some very

deep questions about everything i

thought i knew about leadership

and it happened in particular one night

in western iraq when my leadership

almost killed

two of my own people

we have been conducting reconnaissance

missions along the euphrates river

looking for insurgents and back then

our greatest threat was improvised

explosive devices

or ieds bombs in the road and so we

would go to great lengths to plan our

missions to avoid these ieds

and minimize this threat and one night

we had a unit returning to our base

and thinking that i had the best

judgment thinking that i had all the

knowledge as the leader

i changed the plan i made a change to

the plan

and what happened next was as

predictable

as sunrise one of our vehicles took a

direct hit

from an ied and the two soldiers in the

front seat of this vehicle

very nearly lost their lives and it was

a hundred percent

the result of my bad decision making

now the good news is those two men lived

and they only live because they got

rapidly evacuated to a trauma center

that happened to be just down the road

and they happened to get there in the

nick of time

and the evacuation was chaos and i

wasn’t even on the scene

i had grown up thinking that good

leaders

make good decisions and yet my decision

making almost killed those two men

in an evacuation that had nothing to do

with my leadership or decision making

is what allowed them to live

when i retired from the navy i looked

for a new way to get outside my comfort

zone

and end up taking up beekeeping sadly

this is the first summer where i find

myself not having any bees at all

i wasn’t paying close enough attention

this summer and they got overcrowded and

they swarmed

which means they left to find a new home

and swarming behavior is one of the

miraculous things that bee colonies do

as a group they make these exceptional

decisions

without the benefit of a leader

we may call her the queen bee but she’s

not the leader she just

lays eggs bee colonies are a flat

non-hierarchical system and the research

suggests that bee colonies

have evolved this way because it

protects the colony

from the bad effects of any single bee

with bad judgment

so you see my lessons in war and in

beekeeping

were the same that strong

domineering leaders confuse the fact

that they have extra authority

with the idea that they have extra

judgment

that strong domineering leaders expose

us to risk

that strong domineering leaders

are an impediment to good decision

making

so if we say someone’s a strong leader

what does that mean

and is it the same thing as saying that

they’re effective

similarly when we call a leader weak is

that to say that they’re ineffective

and why do we so often confuse

charisma with leadership

in my experience we skip over these

important questions

and what we do instead is we preach

we preach the virtue of things like

humility

as the number one secret to good

leadership

but this just circles us back around to

the same problem

because if humble leaders are so good if

humility is the answer to leadership

how do we explain successful leaders

like steve jobs

or walt disney who went on to great

success

not being known for their leadership

being humble how do we explain

the election of donald j trump

trump may be an extreme case but he is

not an isolated case

if humility’s so good how do we explain

the fact

that narcissistic personality types are

still

over represented by far

in senior leader positions

you see i went to the naval academy to

study leadership because we believe

that leadership can be taught we believe

that great leaders are made not

born and yet study after study

after study suggests that the question

of who becomes a leader in life

mostly comes down to things like gender

or stature

or the width of our face

if leadership is so much about things we

learn why

is that who emerges as a leader in life

comes down to things we’re born with

until last year among fortune 500 ceos

there were more men named john than

there were women

that would be sensible if men were

particularly high performing with their

leadership

but that’s not the case in fact the

number one thing most organizations can

do

to immediately get a boost in

performance

is to hire a female ceo

so the science of leadership would tell

us

that our leaders should reflect humility

and diversity

and yet we keep ending up with

narcissistic men

so in my 30 years of studying leadership

i’ve concluded that it’s still less a

science

and it’s more a mythology that’s why

three years ago i founded the crystal

group leadership institute

and co-wrote this book leaders myth and

reality

and the book opens with a vignette of

predictably

a man general george washington

america’s first president

crossing the delaware river and this is

one of america’s most recognizable and

famous paintings

now i tell you i know relatively little

about american history

but i happen to know a great deal about

this one painting

and i only know a lot about this one

painting because i spent six years

working in the white house for both

presidents bush and obama

and when i worked in the white house i

spent an unusual amount of time

sitting on a particularly comfortable

couch

this couch was in the west wing lobby of

the white house

and just above this couch hung a

reproduction painting

of washington crossing the delaware

and so as i was sitting on that couch

all those hours

tour groups would come through the west

wing

and the tour guide would stop the tour

group right in front of me

and tell the group about the painting

hanging just over my head

so i learned a lot about this one

painting

and i’ve showed this painting to

thousands of people over the years

and i always ask them the same question

look at washington and tell me the first

word

that comes to mind

exactly i keep hearing the same words

over and over again

confidence stoic

strong

and what i learned about this painting

all those hours sitting on the couch

is that it’s a fiction the delaware

river never froze that way

that’s the wrong flag the boat’s going

the wrong way and washington did not

cross the delaware in a little rowboat

and if you do a little digging you can

find the more accurate depiction of

washington cross in the delaware

and sure enough yes he’s standing at the

front of the boat and yes he

is looking forward but here in the more

accurate depiction

washington’s right hand has a firm grip

on the wheel

of a cannon

why because that’s what real people do

in a boat at night

going to war they don’t do this

why not because it’s ridiculous

but nobody ever offers the word

ridiculous

to describe washington that’s because

all of us

unknowingly subscribe to the mythology

of leadership we all

expect too much of our leaders we all

exaggerate what our leaders are capable

of

now while i spent a lot of time sitting

on that couch i did get out

of the white house from time to time and

one of the more interesting trips i ever

took was when i accompanied president

obama down to fort campbell kentucky

where he met with the team that did the

raid on bin laden

president flew down he gave the team

some awards he got a debrief and we flew

home that night

and on the way home i asked the

president for his reflections about the

trip

and what he told me was that he had been

struck by the way the team leader did

the debrief

and what he was referring to is the fact

that when they turned over the briefing

to the team leader

the team leaders debrief consisted of

mr president my team will now debrief

you

and that was it and that’s surprising

because few of us would actually do that

most of us would feel some temptation

to own that moment

and it’s striking because it’s an

example of what we call humble

leadership or technical term

servant leadership leadership where the

leader believes their job is to

celebrate the success of the team

leadership where the leader believes

that all the powers with the team not

with them

leadership where the leader believes

their job is to enable

their people not to command them

and servant leadership is known to be

powerful and it’s not new it’s been

around for a while

and it’s rare it’s hard to find but it’s

also somewhat misunderstood

i once had the opportunity to catch up

with that team leader

who had impressed the president and i

asked him

where do you get your leadership from

why do you lead this way

and his answer was simply to say

what choice did i have how else would

you lead a team like that

and his answer suggests one of the

greatest myths about leadership

we tend to believe that leadership rests

in the leader

we tend to believe that it’s the leader

that drives the leadership

we tend to see it this way

as a hierarchy with the leader at the

top but the reality is that we should

flip it around

the reality is that leadership rests

mostly

by the followers

but this raises another question

because if leadership really rests with

the followers

why do we even have this thing called

leadership why don’t we just operate

more like a bee colony

well it turns out that millions of years

ago our earliest ancestors were doing

just that

they were a hunter-gatherer species and

they were non-hierarchical

with outstanding leaders

and then relatively recently about 10

000 years ago

we discovered agriculture and we became

an agrarian society

with growing levels of hierarchy and

standing permanent leaders

and this has been a consistent feature

of the human species ever since

and so you see our evolutionary wiring

is conflicted on the one hand

we have a preference for flat

egalitarianism

but on the other hand we have

familiarity

with hierarchy on the one hand we want

our leaders to be

average on the other hand we want our

leaders to be

exceptional we humans

are a walking paradox

and because leadership is a human

endeavor it

too can be paradoxical

a great example is america’s 16th

president

abraham lincoln if you come to my

hometown

of washington d.c you can visit the

lincoln memorial

and if you walk into the memorial and

you look up

you will find inscribed on the wall the

words of the gettysburg address

and there at the top you will note the

famous line

hearkening back to millions of years ago

all men are created equal

and then if you look up to lincoln

himself

you might note that one of his hands is

in a fist

and the other hand is relaxed

symbolizing the fact that lincoln’s

leadership was effective

because it was a combination of both his

strength

and his compassion

this tension

reveals the ways in which sometimes we

want our leaders to stand up

open their mouths and deliver us a

rousing speech

and sometimes we want our leaders

to sit down shut their mouths and listen

this tension explains why it is that

sometimes we want the master

who inspires us with a particular vision

for the future

but sometimes we want the servant

who allows us to achieve that vision

in our own way the reality of leadership

is that it reflects the duality of human

nature

and that’s why we experience leadership

as a paradox and there is no greater

paradox

than finding strength in weakness

we like to celebrate washington’s

strength as him crossing the delaware

but the reality is that america’s first

president

was actually america’s humblest

president

george washington refused the trappings

of power he refused a third term he

voluntarily stepped down

at a time when all of his counterparts

were taking the title

your majesty he took the title

mr president we may insist on seeing him

as a master

but he insisted on us calling him mister

that’s why we need to stop referring to

our leaders as either weak or strong

because so-called strong leaders expose

us to weakness through their domineering

styles

and so-called weak law leaders are often

the strongest

because their humility unlocks the power

in all of us

my most memorable moment working for

america’s 43rd president

was when president bush simply invited

me to join him on a bike ride

and my most memorable moment working for

america’s 44th president

was when president obama stepped aboard

air force one

and told us about his experience the

previous night

as a father watching his oldest daughter

go to her prom the most effective

leaders are the ones

who impress us not only with their bold

sense of vision

but with their bold sense of humanity

and the true test of leadership is

whether our leaders

reflect both sides of this duality

we need leaders strong enough to confess

their weaknesses

we need leaders strong enough to profess

their ignorance

we need leaders who will give us not

only a bold

sense of who we want to be

but equally an honest sense

of who we really are thank you

[音乐

] 30 多年前,

我上大学想学习

领导力,但因为我

也是一名空军军官的儿子,所以我从小

就想成为一名飞行员,

所以我选择了海军学院,这是一个

不错的选择

这个地方非常重视领导力,

以至于他们甚至有一

整栋叫做松散大厅的建筑

专门用于研究

领导力,

但在某些时候,我开始

担心我不会在单座驾驶舱中找到足够的

领导力

所以那时我放弃了童年的

梦想

,我决定成为海豹突击队

的领导实践者

,我成为了 9 11 之后

部署在战争中的特遣部队指挥官

然后它被部署到那些战争

中 我开始面对一些非常

深刻的问题,关于我

认为我知道的关于领导力

的一切,尤其是

在伊拉克西部的一个晚上,当我的领导力

几乎杀死

了我自己的两个人时,

我们一直是 c 在幼发拉底河沿岸执行侦察

任务,

寻找叛乱分子,当时

我们最大的威胁

是道路上的简易爆炸装置或简易爆炸装置炸弹,因此我们

会竭尽全力计划我们的

任务,以避免这些简易爆炸装置

并将这种威胁降到最低,有一天晚上,

我们 有一个单位返回我们的基地

并认为我有最好的

判断力认为我

作为领导者拥有所有知识

我改变了计划我改变

计划接下来发生的事情就像

我们的一辆车日出一样可预测

被简易爆炸装置直接击中

,这辆车前排座位上的两名士兵

几乎丧生,这

是我做出错误决定的百分之百的结果,

现在好消息是这两个人活着

,他们活着只是因为他们 被

迅速疏散到恰好在路上的创伤中心

,他们碰巧在紧要关头到达那里

,疏散混乱,

我不是 即使在现场,

我从小就认为优秀的

领导者会

做出正确的决定,但我的

决定几乎

在一次疏散中杀死了那两个人,这

与我的领导或决策

无关,这让

我从 海军 我

寻找一种新的方式来走出我的舒适

并最终开始养蜂 遗憾的

是这是我发现

自己根本没有任何蜜蜂的第一个夏天

我今年夏天没有给予足够的关注

,他们变得人满为患

他们蜂拥而至

,这意味着他们离开去寻找新家

,蜂拥行为是蜂群作为一个群体所做的

神奇事情之一

他们在

没有领导者帮助的情况下做出这些特殊决定,

我们可以称她为蜂王,但她

不是领导者 她只是

产卵 蜂群是一个扁平的

非等级制度,研究

表明蜂群以

这种方式进化,因为它

可以保护蜂群

免受任何不利影响 一只

判断力差的蜜蜂,

所以你看到我在战争和

养蜂

方面的教训是一样的

是做出良好决策的障碍,

所以如果我们说某人是一个强有力的领导者

,那是什么意思?

这与说

他们同样有效,

当我们称领导者软弱时

说他们是无效的

以及为什么

根据我的经验,我们是否经常将魅力与领导力混为一谈?我们跳过了这些

重要的问题,

而我们所做的是宣扬

我们宣扬谦逊之类的美德,

这是良好领导力的第一秘诀,但这只会让我们

回到 同样的问题,

因为如果谦逊的领导者如此优秀,如果

谦逊是领导力的答案,

我们如何解释

像史蒂夫乔布斯

或沃尔特这样的成功领导者 迪士尼取得了巨大

成功,

不知道他们的

领导谦虚我们如何解释

唐纳德J特朗普特朗普的选举

可能是一个极端的案例,但

如果谦卑是如此善良,我们如何解释

自恋的事实

到目前为止,

在高级领导职位中,人格类型仍然过多,

你看,我去海军学院

学习领导力,因为我们

相信领导力可以被教授我们

相信伟大的领导者不是

天生的,但是一次又一次的

研究表明,

谁成为生活中的领导者的问题

主要归结为性别

或身高

或我们的脸的宽度

如果领导力与我们所了解的事情有关

为什么谁成为生活中的领导者

归结为我们与生俱来的事情

直到去年,在财富 500 强 CEO 中

,名叫约翰的男性

多于女性

rship,

但事实并非如此

自恋的男人一起,

所以在我研究领导力的 30 年里,

我得出的结论是,它仍然不是一门

科学

,而更像是一个神话,这就是为什么

三年前我创立了水晶

集团领导力研究所

并共同撰写了这本书领导者的神话和

现实 这本书的开头是一个可以预见的小插曲,

乔治华盛顿将军是

美国第一任总统

横渡特拉华河,这

是美国最知名和

最著名的画作之一,

现在我告诉你,我

对美国历史知之甚少,

但我碰巧知道很多 关于

这幅画

,我对这幅画只知道很多,

因为我

在白宫为这两幅画工作了六年

布什总统和奥巴马总统

,当我在白宫工作时,我

花了非常多的时间

坐在一张特别舒适的

沙发上,

这张沙发在白宫的西翼大厅里

,就在这张沙发上方挂着一幅

华盛顿穿越华盛顿的复制画 特拉华州

,所以当我坐在沙发上时,

所有这些时间

旅行团都会经过西翼

,导游会

在我面前停下

旅行团,告诉他们那幅画就

挂在我头上,

所以我了解到 很多关于这

幅画的事

这些年来我向成千上万的人展示了这幅画

,我总是问他们同样的问题

看看华盛顿,告诉我第一个

想到的

词,我一直在重复同样的

词, 再次

自信坚忍

,我

坐在沙发上的那些小时里从这幅画中学到的

是,这是一个虚构的特拉华

河从来没有像

这样结冰 错误的旗帜

船走错了方向,华盛顿没有

乘坐小划艇穿越特拉华州

,如果你稍微挖掘一下,你会

发现更准确的描述

华盛顿在特拉华州的十字架

,果然是的,他站在

前面 船,是的,他

正在向前看,但在更

准确的描述中,

华盛顿的右手牢牢地抓住

了大炮的轮子,

为什么因为那是真正的人

晚上在船上做的事情

不是因为这很荒谬,

而是没有人用“荒谬”这个词

来形容华盛顿,那是因为

我们所有人都在

不知不觉中认同

了领导力

的神话 坐在

沙发上的那段时间,我确实

不时离开白宫,

我参加过的最有趣的旅行之一

是我陪同

奥巴马总统下到堡垒 坎贝尔肯塔基州

,在那里他会见了

突袭本拉登

总统的团队,他给团队

一些奖励,他得到了汇报

,那天晚上我们飞回家

,在回家的路上,我问

总统对

这次旅行的看法

, 他告诉我的是,他

对团队负责人进行汇报的方式感到震惊,

他指的

是当他们将简报

交给团队负责人时

,团队负责人的汇报由主席先生组成,

我的团队将 现在向你汇报

,就是这样,这很令人惊讶,

因为我们中很少有人会真正做到这一点

,我们中的大多数人会觉得

拥有那一刻的诱惑

,这很引人注目,因为这

是我们所谓的谦逊

领导或技术术语

仆人领导领导的一个例子,其中

领导者认为他们的工作是

庆祝团队

领导力的成功,领导者

认为团队的所有权力都与他们无关

相信

他们的工作是让

他们的人不去指挥他们,

而且众所周知,仆人式领导是

强大的,而且它并不新鲜,它已经

存在了一段时间

,它很少见,很难找到,但

也有点误解

我曾经有机会赶上

和那个

给总统留下深刻印象的团队负责人,我

他你的领导力是从哪里得到的,你

为什么要这样领导

,他的回答只是

说我有什么选择,否则

你会如何领导这样一个团队

,他的回答是 暗示了

关于领导力的最大神话之一

我们倾向于相信领导力

在于领导者

我们倾向于相信是领导

者推动了领导力

我们倾向于以这种方式将其

视为领导者处于最高层的等级制度,

但现实是 我们应该

扭转现实的是,领导力

主要

取决于追随者,

但这提出了另一个问题,

因为如果领导力真的

取决于追随者,

为什么我们还要 这个叫做

领导力的东西为什么我们不

更像一个蜂群

那样运作呢?事实证明,数百万

年前,我们最早的祖先所做的

只是

他们是一个狩猎采集的物种,

他们没有等级制度,

拥有杰出的领导者

和 然后相对最近,大约 10

000 年前,

我们发现了农业,我们成为

了一个

等级制度不断提高的农业社会和

永久的领导者

,从那时起,这一直是人类的一贯特征

,所以你会看到我们的进化

线路在 一方面,

我们偏爱扁平的

平等主义,

但另一方面,我们

熟悉等级制度,一方面我们希望

我们的领导者是

平庸的,另一方面我们希望我们的

领导者是

卓越的,我们人类

是一个行走的悖论

,因为领导 是人类的

努力 它

也可能是自相矛盾的

一个很好的例子是美国第 16

任总统

亚伯拉罕·林肯 如果你来我的

h

华盛顿的 ometown 您可以参观

林肯纪念堂

,如果您走进纪念馆

并向上看,

您会发现墙上

刻着葛底斯堡地址

的字样,在顶部您会注意到

那句著名的

台词,可以追溯到数以百万计的人。 多年前,

人人生而平等

,然后如果你仰望林肯

本人,

你可能会注意到他的一只

手握着拳头

,另一只手放松,这

象征着林肯的

领导是有效的,

因为它是他两者的结合。

力量

和他的同情心

这种张力

揭示了有时我们

希望我们的领导者站起来

张开嘴给我们

发表振奋人心的演讲的方式

,有时我们希望我们的领导

者坐下来闭嘴倾听

这种张力解释了为什么

有时会这样 我们希望主人

能够以特定的未来愿景激励我们,

但有时我们希望仆人

能够让我们以

自己的方式实现这一愿景 y 领导力的现实

是它反映了人性的二元性

,这就是为什么我们将领导力

视为一个悖论,没有

比在弱点中找到力量更大的悖论了,

我们喜欢庆祝华盛顿

穿越特拉华州时的力量,

但现实是 美国的第一

总统实际上是美国最谦逊的

总统

乔治华盛顿拒绝了

权力的伪装他拒绝了第三个任期他

自愿下台,而

当时他的所有同行

都在接受

陛下的头衔他接受了

总统先生的头衔我们可能会坚持要见他

作为大师,

但他坚持要我们称他为先生

,这就是为什么我们需要停止将

我们的领导称为弱或强,

因为所谓的强领导

通过他们的霸道风格暴露我们的弱点,

而所谓的弱法律领导往往

是 最强大,

因为他们的谦逊释放了

我们所有人的力量

我为美国 4 工作最难忘的时刻

第三任

总统是布什总统简单

地邀请我和他一起骑自行车,

而我为

美国第 44 任总统工作的最难忘

的时刻是奥巴马总统登上

空军一号

并告诉我们他

前一天晚上

作为父亲观看他的大儿子的经历 女儿

去参加她的舞会 最有影响力的

领导

者不仅以大胆

远见和大胆的人性给

我们留下深刻印象 足以承认

他们的弱点

我们需要足够强大的领导者来承认

他们的无知