A lesson on looking Amy Herman

Take a look at this work of art.

What is it that you see?

At first glance, it looks
to be a grandfather clock

with a sheet thrown over it

and a rope tied around the center.

But a first look always warrants a second.

Look again.

What do you see now?

If you look more closely,

you’ll realize
that this entire work of art

is made from one piece of sculpture.

There is no clock,

there is no rope,

and there is no sheet.

It is one piece of bleached
Honduras mahogany.

Now let me be clear:

this exercise was not
about looking at sculpture.

It’s about looking

and understanding
that looking closely can save a life,

change your company

and even help you understand
why your children behave the way they do.

It’s a skill that I call
visual intelligence,

and I use works of art to teach everybody,

from everyday people
to those for whom looking is the job,

like Navy SEALs and homicide
detectives and trauma nurses.

The fact is that no matter how skilled
you might be at looking,

you still have so much
to learn about seeing.

Because we all think we get it
in a first glance and a sudden flash,

but the real skill is in understanding
how to look slowly

and how to look more carefully.

The talent is in remembering –

in the crush of the daily urgencies
that demand our attention –

to step back and look through
those lenses to help us see

what we’ve been missing all along.

So how can looking at painting
and sculpture help?

Because art is a powerful tool.

It’s a powerful tool
that engages both sight and insight

and reframes our understanding
of where we are and what we see.

Here’s an example of a work of art

that reminded me
that visual intelligence –

it’s an ongoing learning process

and one that really is never mastered.

I came across this quiet,
seemingly abstract painting,

and I had to step up to it twice,

even three times,

to understand why it resonated so deeply.

Now, I’ve seen the Washington Monument
in person thousands of times,

well aware of the change in the color
of marble a third of the way up,

but I had never really looked
at it out of context

or truly as a work of art.

And here, Georgia O’Keeffe’s painting
of this architectural icon made me realize

that if we put our mind to it,

it’s possible to see everyday things

in a wholly new
and eye-opening perspective.

Now, there are some skeptics that believe
that art just belongs in an art museum.

They believe that it has no practical
use beyond its aesthetic value.

I know who they are
in every audience I teach.

Their arms are crossed,
their legs are crossed,

their body language is saying,

“What am I going to learn
from this lady who talks fast

about painting and sculpture?”

So how do I make it relevant for them?

I ask them to look at this work of art,

like this portrait by Kumi Yamashita.

And I ask them to step in close,

and even closer still,

and while they’re looking
at the work of art,

they need to be asking questions
about what they see.

And if they ask the right questions,

like, “What is this work of art?

Is it a painting? Is it a sculpture?

What is it made of?” …

they will find out
that this entire work of art

is made of a wooden board,

10,000 nails

and one unbroken piece of sewing thread.

Now that might be
interesting to some of you,

but what does it have to do
with the work that these people do?

And the answer is everything.

Because we all interact with people
multiple times on a daily basis,

and we need to get better
at asking questions

about what it is that we see.

Learning to frame
the question in such a way

as to elicit the information
that we need to do our jobs,

is a critical life skill.

Like the radiologist who told me

that looking at the negative
spaces in a painting

helped her discern
more discreet abnormalities in an MRI.

Or the police officer who said
that understanding the emotional dynamic

between people in a painting

helped him to read body language
at a domestic violence crime scene,

and it enabled him to think twice
before drawing and firing his weapon.

And even parents can look to see
absences of color in paintings

to understand that
what their children say to them

is as important as what they don’t say.

So how do I –

how do I train to be
more visually intelligent?

It comes down to four As.

Every new situation, every new problem –

we practice four As.

First, we assess our situation.

We ask, “What do we have in front of us?”

Then, we analyze it.

We say, “What’s important?

What do I need? What don’t I need?”

Then, we articulate it in a conversation,
in a memo, in a text, in an email.

And then, we act: we make a decision.

We all do this multiple times a day,

but we don’t realize what a role
seeing and looking plays

in all of those actions,

and how visual intelligence
can really improve everything.

So recently, I had a group
of counterterrorism officials

at a museum in front of this painting.

El Greco’s painting,
“The Purification of the Temple,”

in which Christ, in the center,
in a sweeping and violent gesture,

is expelling the sinners
from the temple of prayer.

The group of counterterrorism officials
had five minutes with that painting,

and in that short amount of time,
they had to assess the situation,

analyze the details,

articulate what, if anything,

they would do if they were
in that painting.

As you can imagine,
observations and insights differed.

Who would they talk to?

Who would be the best witness?

Who was a good potential witness?

Who was lurking?

Who had the most information?

But my favorite comment
came from a seasoned cop

who looked at the central figure and said,

“You see that guy in the pink?” –

referring to Christ –

he said, “I’d collar him,
he’s causing all the trouble.”

(Laughter)

So looking at art gives us a perfect
vehicle to rethink how we solve problems

without the aid of technology.

Looking at the work
of Felix Gonzalez-Torres,

you see two clocks
in perfect synchronicity.

The hour, minute and
second hand perfectly aligned.

They are installed side by side
and they’re touching,

and they are entitled
“‘Untitled’ (Perfect Lovers).”

But closer analysis makes you realize

that these are two
battery-operated clocks,

which in turn makes you understand –

“Hey, wait a minute …

One of those batteries
is going to stop before the other.

One of those clocks is going
to slow down and die before the other

and it’s going to alter
the symmetry of the artwork.”

Just articulating that thought process

includes the necessity
of a contingency plan.

You need to have contingencies
for the unforeseen,

the unexpected and the unknown,

whenever and however they may happen.

Now, using art to increase
our visual intelligence

involves planning for contingencies,

understanding the big picture
and the small details

and noticing what’s not there.

So in this painting by Magritte,

noticing that there are no tracks
under the train,

there is no fire in the fireplace

and there are no candles
in the candlesticks

actually more accurately
describes the painting

than if you were to say, “Well,
there’s a train coming out of a fireplace,

and there are candlesticks on the mantle.”

It may sound counterintuitive
to say what isn’t there,

but it’s really a very valuable tool.

When a detective who had learned
about visual intelligence

in North Carolina

was called to the crime scene,

it was a boating fatality,

and the eyewitness told this detective
that the boat had flipped over

and the occupant had drowned underneath.

Now, instinctively, crime scene
investigators look for what is apparent,

but this detective
did something different.

He looked for what wasn’t there,
which is harder to do.

And he raised the question:

if the boat had really
tipped flipped over –

as the eyewitness said that it did –

how come the papers that were kept
at one end of the boat

were completely dry?

Based on that one small
but critical observation,

the investigation shifted
from accidental death to homicide.

Now, equally important
to saying what isn’t there

is the ability to find visual connections
where they may not be apparent.

Like Marie Watt’s totem pole of blankets.

It illustrates that finding hidden
connections in everyday objects

can resonate so deeply.

The artist collected blankets
from all different people

in her community,

and she had the owners
of the blankets write, on a tag,

the significance of
the blanket to the family.

Some of the blankets
had been used for baby blankets,

some of them had been used
as picnic blankets,

some of them had been used for the dog.

We all have blankets in our homes

and understand the significance
that they play.

But similarly, I instruct new doctors:

when they walk into a patient’s room,

before they pick up that medical chart,

just look around the room.

Are there balloons or cards,

or that special blanket on the bed?

That tells the doctor there’s a connection
to the outside world.

If that patient has someone
in the outside world

to assist them and help them,

the doctor can implement the best care
with that connection in mind.

In medicine, people
are connected as humans

before they’re identified
as doctor and patient.

But this method of enhancing perception –

it need not be disruptive,

and it doesn’t necessitate
an overhaul in looking.

Like Jorge Méndez Blake’s sculpture
of building a brick wall

above Kafka’s book “El Castillo”

shows that more astute observation
can be subtle and yet invaluable.

You can discern the book,

and you can see
how it disrupted the symmetry

of the bricks directly above it,

but by the time you get
to the end of the sculpture,

you can no longer see the book.

But looking at the work of art
in its entirety,

you see that the impact
of the work’s disruption on the bricks

is nuanced and unmistakable.

One thought,

one idea,

one innovation can alter an approach,

change a process

and even save lives.

I’ve been teaching visual intelligence
for over 15 years,

and to my great amazement
and astonishment –

to my never-ending astonishment
and amazement,

I have seen that looking at art
with a critical eye

can help to anchor us in our world
of uncharted waters,

whether you are a paramilitary trooper,

a caregiver, a doctor or a mother.

Because let’s face it, things go wrong.

(Laughter)

Things go wrong.

And don’t misunderstand me,

I’d eat that doughnut in a minute.

(Laughter)

But we need to understand the consequences
of what it is that we observe,

and we need to convert observable details
into actionable knowledge.

Like Jennifer Odem’s sculpture
of tables standing sentinel

on the banks of the Mississippi River

in New Orleans,

guarding against the threat
of post-Katrina floodwaters

and rising up against adversity,

we too have the ability
to act affirmatively

and affect positive change.

I have been mining the world of art

to help people across
the professional spectrum

to see the extraordinary in the everyday,

to articulate what is absent

and to be able to inspire
creativity and innovation,

no matter how small.

And most importantly,

to forge human connections
where they may not be apparent,

empowering us all to see our work
and the world writ large

with a new set of eyes.

Thank you.

(Applause)

看看这件艺术品。

你看到的是什么?

乍一看,它看起来像是
一个落地钟

,上面盖着一张床单

,中间系着一根绳子。

但是第一眼总是值得第二眼。

再看一遍。

你现在看到了什么?

如果你仔细观察,

你会
发现这整件艺术品

是由一件雕塑制成的。

没有时钟,

没有绳索,

也没有床单。

它是一块漂白的
洪都拉斯桃花心木。

现在让我明确一点:

这个练习
不是看雕塑。

这是关于观察

和理解
,仔细观察可以挽救生命,

改变你的公司

,甚至帮助你理解
为什么你的孩子会表现出他们的行为方式。

这是一种我称之为
视觉智能的技能

,我用艺术作品来教每个人,

从普通人
到那些以寻找为工作的人,

比如海豹突击队、凶杀案
侦探和创伤护士。

事实是,无论
你在观察方面有多熟练,

你仍然
需要学习很多东西。

因为我们都认为
我们是一眼就看出来了,突然一闪

而过,但真正的技巧是懂得
如何慢慢看

,如何更仔细地看。

天赋在于记住——

在需要我们关注的日常紧迫性的迷恋中
——

退后一步,透过
这些镜头来帮助我们

看到我们一直错过的东西。

那么看绘画
和雕塑有什么帮助呢?

因为艺术是一种强大的工具。

它是一个强大的工具
,它可以结合视觉和洞察力,

并重新构建我们对我们所处位置和所见事物的理解

这是一个艺术作品的例子,

它提醒
我视觉智能——

这是一个持续的学习过程

,而且永远不会被掌握。

我遇到了这幅安静的、
看似抽象的画作

,我不得不两次,

甚至三次,

才能理解它为什么引起如此深刻的共鸣。

现在,我已经亲眼看过华盛顿
纪念碑数千次了,

很清楚
大理石在上升三分之一处颜色的变化,

但我从来没有真正
脱离背景

或真正将其视为一件艺术品 .

在这里,乔治亚·奥基夫 (Georgia O’Keeffe)
对这座建筑图标的绘画让我意识到

,如果我们专注于它,

就有可能

以全新的
、令人大开眼界的视角看待日常事物。

现在,有些怀疑论者
认为艺术只属于艺术博物馆。

他们认为,
除了审美价值之外,它没有任何实际用途。

我知道
在我教的每一位听众中他们是谁。

他们双臂交叉
,双腿交叉,

他们的肢体语言在说:

“我
要从这位

谈论绘画和雕塑的女士身上学到什么?”

那么我如何使它与他们相关呢?

我让他们看看这件艺术品,

比如山下久美的这幅肖像。

我要求他们靠近,

甚至更近

,当他们在
看艺术作品时,

他们需要
就他们所看到的提出问题。

如果他们提出正确的问题,

例如,“这件艺术品

是什么?它是一幅画吗?它是一个雕塑吗

?它是由什么制成的?” …

他们会发现
,这整件艺术品

是由一块木板、

10,000 颗钉子

和一根完整的缝纫线制成的。

现在这
对你们中的一些人来说可能很有趣,

但这
与这些人所做的工作有什么关系?

答案就是一切。

因为我们每天都与人
多次互动,

我们需要更好
地提出

关于我们所看到的问题的问题。

学习
以这样一种方式来构建问题,

以便引出
我们完成工作所需的信息,这

是一项至关重要的生活技能。

就像放射科医生告诉我

,看着一幅画中的负
空间

有助于她
在 MRI 中辨别出更谨慎的异常。

或者说
,了解

一幅画中人与人之间的情感动态

有助于他
在家庭暴力犯罪现场阅读肢体语言

,这让
他在绘画和开枪之前三思而后行。

甚至父母也可以看到
绘画中没有颜色,


了解他们的孩子对他们说的话与

他们不说的话一样重要。

那么我

该如何——如何训练以
提高视觉智能呢?

它归结为四个A。

每一个新的情况,每一个新的问题——

我们练习四个A。

首先,我们评估我们的情况。

我们问:“我们面前有什么?”

然后,我们对其进行分析。

我们说,“什么是重要的?

我需要什么?我不需要什么?”

然后,我们在对话
、备忘录、文本、电子邮件中表达出来。

然后,我们采取行动:我们做出决定。

我们每天都会这样做多次,

但我们没有意识到视觉
和观察

在所有这些动作中扮演的角色,

以及视觉智能
如何真正改善一切。

所以最近,我

在这幅画前的博物馆里有一群反恐官员。

埃尔·格列柯的画作
《圣殿的净化》

,其中基督在中央,
以一种彻底而暴力的姿态

,将罪人
逐出祈祷的圣殿。

这组反恐官员
有五分钟的时间看那幅画

,在这短短的时间内,
他们必须评估情况,

分析细节,

阐明

如果他们
在那幅画中会做什么,如果有的话。

正如你可以想象的那样,
观察和见解是不同的。

他们会和谁说话?

谁会是最好的见证人?

谁是一个很好的潜在证人?

谁在潜伏?

谁掌握的信息最多?

但我最喜欢的评论
来自一位经验丰富的警察

,他看着中心人物说:

“你看到那个穿粉红色的人了吗?” ——

提到基督——

他说,“我要给他戴上项圈,
他在制造所有的麻烦。”

(笑声)

所以看艺术给了我们一个完美的
工具来重新思考我们如何在

没有技术帮助的情况下解决问题。

看看
Felix Gonzalez-Torres 的作品,

你会看到两个
完美同步的时钟。

时针、分针和
秒针完美对齐。

它们并排安装
,感人至深,

取名为“‘Untitled’(Perfect Lovers)”。

但更仔细的分析会让你

意识到这是两个
电池供电的时钟,

这反过来又让你明白——

“嘿,等一下……

其中一个
电池将在另一个之前停止。

其中一个时钟正在运行
放慢速度并在另一个之前死去

,这将改变
艺术品的对称性。”

仅仅阐明这个思考过程就

包括
了应急计划的必要性。

您需要为意外

、意外和未知的意外事件做好准备

,无论它们何时何地发生。

现在,使用艺术来提高
我们的视觉智能

涉及计划突发事件,

了解大局
和小细节,

并注意不存在的东西。

所以在马格利特的这幅画中,

注意到火车下面没有
铁轨,

壁炉里没有火,烛台

上没有
蜡烛,

实际上

比你说“嗯,
有一个 火车从壁炉里出来,

地幔上有烛台。”

说不存在的东西可能听起来违反直觉,

但它确实是一个非常有价值的工具。

当一名在北卡罗来纳州了解视觉智能的侦探

被叫到犯罪现场时,

这是一起划船死亡事件

,目击者告诉这名侦探
,船翻了

,乘员淹死在下面。

现在,犯罪现场
调查人员本能地寻找明显的东西,

但这位侦探
做了一些不同的事情。

他寻找不存在的东西,
这更难做到。

他提出了一个问题:

如果船真的
翻倒了——

正如目击者所说的那样——

为什么放在
船一端

的文件完全干了?

基于这一小
而重要的观察

,调查
从意外死亡转向凶杀案。

现在,
与说出不存在的东西同样重要的

是能够
在它们可能不明显的地方找到视觉联系。

就像玛丽瓦特的毯子图腾柱。

它说明了在日常物品中发现隐藏的
联系

可以引起如此深刻的共鸣。

这位艺术家

她所在社区

的所有人那里收集了毯子,她让
毯子的主人在标签上写下

毯子对家庭的意义。

一些
毯子被用来做婴儿毯,

一些被
用作野餐毯,

一些被用来给狗。

我们家里都有毯子,

并且了解它们的重要性

但同样,我会指导新医生:

当他们走进病人的房间时,

在他们拿起病历之前,

看看房间周围。 床上

有气球或卡片,

还是那张特殊的毯子?

这告诉医生
与外界有联系。

如果该患者在

外界有人帮助他们并帮助他们,

那么医生可以
在考虑到这种联系的情况下实施最佳护理。

在医学上,人们

在被确定
为医生和病人之前就已经是人类了。

但是这种增强感知的方法——

它不需要具有破坏性

,也不需要
对外观进行彻底检查。

就像豪尔赫·门德斯·布莱克(Jorge Méndez Blake)

在卡夫卡的《埃尔卡斯蒂略》一书中建造一堵砖墙的雕塑一样,这

表明更精明的观察
可以是微妙的,但也是无价的。

你可以辨别这本书

,你可以看到
它是如何破坏了

正上方砖块的对称性,

但是当你
走到雕塑的尽头时,

你已经看不到这本书了。

但是从整体上看艺术作品

你会发现
作品的破坏对砖块的影响

是微妙而明确的。

一个想法、

一个想法、

一个创新可以改变一种方法、

改变一个过程

,甚至可以挽救生命。

我已经教授视觉
智能超过 15 年了

,令我非常惊讶
和惊讶——

令我永无止境的惊讶
和惊讶,

我看到用批判的眼光看待艺术

可以帮助我们在我们的世界中锚定
未知领域,

无论您是准军事部队士兵

、护理人员、医生还是母亲。

因为让我们面对现实,事情会出错。

(笑声)

事情出错了。

别误会我,

我会在一分钟内吃掉那个甜甜圈。

(笑声)

但是我们需要了解我们所观察到的结果的后果

,我们需要将可观察到的细节
转化为可操作的知识。

就像詹妮弗·奥德姆 (Jennifer Odem) 的雕塑在新奥尔良

的密西西比河岸边

站岗,
防范卡特里娜飓风后洪水的威胁

并奋起抵抗逆境,

我们也有能力
采取积极行动

并影响积极的变化。

我一直在挖掘艺术世界,

以帮助
各个专业领域的

人们看到日常生活中的非凡之处

,阐明缺席的事物,

并能够激发
创造力和创新,

无论多么渺小。

最重要的是,

在可能不明显的地方建立人际关系,

让我们所有人都能以全新的眼光看待我们的工作
和世界

谢谢你。

(掌声)