How my sons short life made a lasting difference Sarah Gray

I was three months pregnant with twins

when my husband Ross and I
went to my second sonogram.

I was 35 years old at the time,

and I knew that that meant
we had a higher risk

of having a child with a birth defect.

So, Ross and I researched
the standard birth defects,

and we felt reasonably prepared.

Well, nothing would have prepared us

for the bizarre diagnosis
that we were about to face.

The doctor explained
that one of our twins, Thomas,

had a fatal birth defect
called anencephaly.

This means that his brain
was not formed correctly

because part of his skull was missing.

Babies with this diagnosis
typically die in utero

or within a few minutes, hours
or days of being born.

But the other twin, Callum,

appeared to be healthy,
as far as the doctor could tell,

and these twins were identical,

genetically identical.

So after a lot of questions about
how this could have possibly happened,

a selective reduction was mentioned,

and while this procedure
was not impossible,

it posed some unique risks
for the healthy twin and for me,

so we decided to carry
the pregnancy to term.

So there I was, three months pregnant,
with two trimesters ahead of me,

and I had to find a way to manage
my blood pressure and my stress.

And it felt like having a roommate
point a loaded gun at you for six months.

But I stared down
the barrel of that gun for so long

that I saw a light
at the end of the tunnel.

While there was nothing we could do
to prevent the tragedy,

I wanted to find a way
for Thomas’s brief life

to have some kind of positive impact.

So I asked my nurse about organ,
eye and tissue donation.

She connected with our local
organ-procurement organization,

the Washington Regional
Transplant Community.

WRTC explained to me

that Thomas would probably be too small
at birth to donate for transplant,

and I was shocked:

I didn’t even know
you could be rejected for that.

But they said that he would be
a good candidate to donate for research.

This helped me see Thomas in a new light.

As opposed to just a victim of a disease,

I started to see him as a possible key
to unlock a medical mystery.

On March 23, 2010,

the twins were born,
and they were both born alive.

And just like the doctor said,

Thomas was missing
the top part of his skull,

but he could nurse,

drink from a bottle,

cuddle and grab our fingers
like a normal baby,

and he slept in our arms.

After six days, Thomas died in Ross’s arms

surrounded by our family.

We called WRTC, who sent a van to our home

and brought him to Children’s
National Medical Center.

A few hours later, we got a call to say
that the recovery was a success,

and Thomas’s donations
would be going to four different places.

His cord blood would go
to Duke University.

His liver would go to a cell-therapy
company called Cytonet in Durham.

His corneas would go
to Schepens Eye Research Institute,

which is part of Harvard Medical School,

and his retinas would go
to the University of Pennsylvania.

A few days later, we had a funeral
with our immediate family,

including baby Callum,

and we basically
closed this chapter in our lives.

But I did find myself wondering,
what’s happening now?

What are the researchers learning?

And was it even worthwhile to donate?

WRTC invited Ross and I
to a grief retreat,

and we met about
15 other grieving families

who had donated their loved one’s
organs for transplant.

Some of them had even received letters

from the people who received
their loved one’s organs,

saying thank you.

I learned that they
could even meet each other

if they’d both sign a waiver,

almost like an open adoption.

And I was so excited,
I thought maybe I could write a letter

or I could get a letter
and learn about what happened.

But I was disappointed to learn

that this process only exists
for people who donate for transplant.

So I was jealous.
I had transplant envy, I guess.

(Laughter)

But over the years that followed,

I learned a lot more about donation,

and I even got a job in the field.

And I came up with an idea.

I wrote a letter that started out,

“Dear Researcher.”

I explained who I was,

and I asked if they could tell me
why they requested infant retinas

in March of 2010,

and I asked if my family
could visit their lab.

I emailed it to the eye bank
that arranged the donation,

the Old Dominion Eye Foundation,

and asked if they could
send it to the right person.

They said that they had
never done this before,

and they couldn’t guarantee a response,

but they wouldn’t be an obstacle,
and they would deliver it.

Two days later, I got a response

from Dr. Arupa Ganguly
of the University of Pennsylvania.

She thanked me for the donation,

and she explained
that she is studying retinoblastoma,

which is a deadly cancer of the retina

that affects children
under the age of five,

and she said that yes,
we were invited to visit her lab.

So next we talked on the phone,

and one of the first things she said to me

was that she couldn’t possibly
imagine how we felt,

and that Thomas had given
the ultimate sacrifice,

and that she seemed
to feel indebted to us.

So I said, “Nothing against your study,

but we didn’t actually pick it.

We donated to the system,
and the system chose your study.

I said, “And second of all,
bad things happen to children every day,

and if you didn’t want these retinas,

they would probably
be buried in the ground right now.

So to be able to participate in your study

gives Thomas’s life
a new layer of meaning.

So, never feel guilty
about using this tissue.”

Next, she explained to me how rare it was.

She had placed a request
for this tissue six years earlier

with the National Disease
Research Interchange.

She got only one sample of tissue
that fit her criteria,

and it was Thomas’s.

Next, we arranged a date for me
to come visit the lab,

and we chose March 23, 2015,
which was the twins' fifth birthday.

After we hung up, I emailed her
some pictures of Thomas and Callum,

and a few weeks later,
we received this T-shirt in the mail.

A few months later, Ross, Callum
and I piled in the car

and we went for a road trip.

We met Arupa and her staff,

and Arupa said that when I told her
not to feel guilty, that it was a relief,

and that she hadn’t seen it
from our perspective.

She also explained that Thomas
had a secret code name.

The same way Henrietta Lacks
is called HeLa,

Thomas was called RES 360.

RES means research,

and 360 means he was the 360th specimen

over the course of about 10 years.

She also shared with us a unique document,

and it was the shipping label

that sent his retinas
from DC to Philadelphia.

This shipping label
is like an heirloom to us now.

It’s the same way that a military medal
or a wedding certificate might be.

Arupa also explained that she is using
Thomas’s retina and his RNA

to try to inactivate the gene
that causes tumor formation,

and she even showed us some results
that were based on RES 360.

Then she took us to the freezer

and she showed us the two samples
that she still has

that are still labeled RES 360.

There’s two little ones left.

She said she saved it

because she doesn’t know
when she might get more.

After this, we went to the conference room

and we relaxed and we had lunch together,

and the lab staff presented Callum
with a birthday gift.

It was a child’s lab kit.

And they also offered him an internship.

(Laughter)

So in closing, I have two
simple messages today.

One is that most of us probably
don’t think about donating to research.

I know I didn’t.
I think I’m a normal person.

But I did it.

It was a good experience,
and I recommend it,

and it brought my family a lot of peace.

And second is if you work
with human tissue

and you wonder about the donor
and about the family,

write them a letter.

Tell them you received it,
tell them what you’re working on,

and invite them to visit your lab,

because that visit may be
even more gratifying for you

than it is for them.

And I’d also like to ask you a favor.

If you’re ever successful
in arranging one of these visits,

please tell me about it.

The other part of my family’s story

is that we ended up visiting
all four facilities

that received Thomas’s donations.

And we met amazing people
doing inspiring work.

The way I see it now
is that Thomas got into Harvard,

Duke and Penn –

(Laughter)

And he has a job at Cytonet,

and he has colleagues and he has coworkers

who are in the top of their fields.

And they need him
in order to do their job.

And a life that once seemed
brief and insignificant

revealed itself to be vital,
everlasting and relevant.

And I only hope that my life
can be as relevant.

Thank you.

(Applause)

当我丈夫罗斯和
我进行第二次超声检查时,我怀有双胞胎三个月。

当时我 35 岁

,我知道这意味着
我们

生出先天缺陷孩子的风险更高。

所以,罗斯和我研究
了标准的出生缺陷

,我们觉得准备充分。

好吧,没有什么能让

我们为即将面临的奇怪诊断做好准备。

医生解释
说,我们的双胞胎之一,托马斯,

有一种致命的先天缺陷,
叫做无脑畸形。

这意味着他的
大脑没有正确形成,

因为他的部分头骨丢失了。

有这种诊断的婴儿
通常在子宫内

或出生后几分钟、几小时
或几天内死亡。

但据医生所知,另一对双胞胎卡勒姆

似乎很健康,

而且这对双胞胎是相同的,

基因相同。

所以在问了很多关于
这怎么可能发生的问题之后,

有人提到了选择性减产

,虽然这个
程序不是不可能的,

但它
给健康的双胞胎和我带来了一些独特的风险,

所以我们决定
继续怀孕 .

所以我怀孕
三个月了,还有两个三个月

,我必须找到一种方法来控制
我的血压和压力。

感觉就像有一个
室友用上膛的枪指着你六个月。

但我盯着
那把枪的枪管看了很长时间

,以至于我看到
了隧道尽头的一盏灯。

虽然我们
无法阻止悲剧发生,但

我想找到一种方法,
让托马斯短暂的

一生产生某种积极的影响。

所以我问我的护士关于器官、
眼睛和组织捐赠的事情。

她与我们当地的
器官采购

组织华盛顿地区
移植社区建立了联系。

WRTC 向我解释

说,Thomas 可能
在出生时太小而无法捐赠移植

,我感到震惊:

我什至不知道
你会因此而被拒绝。

但他们说他将是
捐赠研究的好人选。

这让我对托马斯有了新的认识。

与只是疾病的受害者不同,

我开始将他视为
解开医学谜团的可能钥匙。

2010 年 3 月 23 日,

这对双胞胎出生,
而且他们都还活着。

就像医生说的那样,

托马斯失去
了头骨的上半部分,

但他可以像正常婴儿一样哺乳、

喝水、

拥抱和抓住我们的手指

他睡在我们的怀里。

六天后,托马斯死在罗斯的怀里,

被我们家人包围。

我们打电话给 WRTC,他派了一辆面包车到我们家

,把他带到了儿童
国家医疗中心。

几个小时后,我们接到电话,
说恢复成功

,托马斯的捐款
将流向四个不同的地方。

他的脐带血将
流向杜克大学。

他的肝脏将
被送到位于达勒姆的一家名为 Cytonet 的细胞治疗公司。

他的角膜将被
送到哈佛医学院的谢彭斯眼科研究所

,他的视网膜将被
送到宾夕法尼亚大学。

几天后,我们

包括婴儿卡勒姆在内的直系亲属举行了葬礼

,我们基本上
结束了生活中的这一章。

但我确实发现自己想知道,
现在发生了什么?

研究人员在学习什么?

捐赠是否值得?

WRTC 邀请罗斯和我
参加一个悲伤的静修会

,我们遇到了大约
15 个其他悲伤的家庭

,他们捐赠了他们所爱的人的
器官进行移植。

他们中的一些人甚至

收到了接受亲人器官的人的来信

说谢谢。

我了解到,

如果他们都签署弃权书,他们

甚至可以见面,就像公开收养一样。

我非常兴奋,
我想也许我可以写一封信,

或者我可以收到一封信
并了解发生了什么。

但我很失望地

得知这个过程只
适用于为移植而捐献的人。

所以我很嫉妒。
我猜我嫉妒移植。

(笑声)

但在接下来的几年里,

我学到了很多关于捐赠的知识

,我什至在这个领域找到了一份工作。

我想出了一个主意。

我写了一封以

“亲爱的研究员”开头的信。

我解释了我是谁

,我问他们能否告诉我
为什么他们

在 2010 年 3 月要求婴儿视网膜

,我问我的家人
是否可以参观他们的实验室。

我将它通过电子邮件发送给安排捐赠的眼库

即 Old Dominion Eye Foundation,

并询问他们是否可以
将其发送给合适的人。

他们说他们以前
从来没有这样做过

,他们不能保证会有回应,

但他们不会成为障碍
,他们会交付。

两天后,我收到了宾夕法尼亚大学的

Arupa Ganguly 博士的回复

她感谢我的捐赠,

并解释
说她正在研究视网膜母细胞瘤,

这是一种影响五岁以下儿童的致命视网膜癌

,她说是的,
我们被邀请参观她的实验室。

所以接下来我们通了电话

,她对我说的第一件事

就是她无法
想象我们的感受

,托马斯做出
了最大的牺牲

,她似乎
对我们很感激。

所以我说,“没有反对你的研究,

但我们并没有真正选择它。

我们捐赠给系统
,系统选择了你的研究。

我说,“其次,
每天都有坏事发生在孩子身上,

而且 如果你不想要这些视网膜,

它们现在可能
会被埋在地下。

所以能够参与到你的学习中,

让托马斯的生活
有了新的意义。

所以,永远不要
对使用这种组织感到内疚。”

接下来,她向我解释了它是多么罕见。

六年前

,她向国家疾病
研究交流中心提出了对这种组织的要求。

她只得到了一个适合她的组织样本
标准

,是Thomas的。

接下来,我们安排了我
去实验室的日期

,我们选择了2015年3月23日,
也就是双胞胎的五岁生日

。挂断电话后,我给她发了
一些Thomas的照片和 卡勒姆

,几周后,
我们收到了这件 T 恤寄来的邮件。

几个月后,罗斯、卡勒姆
和我挤在车里

,我们开始了一次公路旅行。

我们遇到了阿鲁帕和她的工作人员

,阿鲁帕说 当我告诉她
不要感到内疚时,这是一种解脱,

而且她没有
从我们的角度看到它。

她还解释说托马斯
有一个秘密代号

。就像海瑞塔拉克斯
被称为海拉一样,

托马斯是 叫 RES 360。RES

表示研究

,360 表示他是 10 年来的第 360 个

标本。

她还 sh 与我们一起获得了一份独特的文件

,正是运输

标签将他的视网膜
从华盛顿特区送到了费城。

这个运输标签
现在对我们来说就像传家宝。

这与军事勋章
或结婚证书的方式相同。

Arupa 还解释说,她正在使用
Thomas 的视网膜和他的 RNA

试图使导致肿瘤形成的基因失活

,她甚至向我们展示
了一些基于 RES 360 的结果。

然后她把我们带到了冰箱

,她向我们展示了这两个
她仍然拥有的样本

仍然标记为 RES 360。还

剩下两个小样本。

她说她保存了它,

因为她不知道什么
时候可以得到更多。

之后,我们去会议室

放松一下,一起吃午饭

,实验室工作人员给卡勒姆
送了生日礼物。

这是一个儿童的实验室工具包。

他们还为他提供了实习机会。

(笑声

) 最后,我今天有两条
简单的信息。

一是我们大多数人可能
不会考虑为研究捐款。

我知道我没有。
我觉得我是个正常人。

但我做到了。

这是一次很好的体验
,我推荐它

,它给我的家人带来了很多安宁。

其次,如果您
使用人体组织

并且想了解捐赠者
和家人,请

给他们写信。

告诉他们你收到了它,
告诉他们你在做什么,

并邀请他们参观你的实验室,

因为那次访问
对你

来说可能比对他们来说更令人满意。

我还想请你帮个忙。

如果您成功
地安排了其中一次访问,

请告诉我。

我家故事的另一部分

是,我们最终参观了
所有四个

接受托马斯捐款的设施。

我们遇到了很棒的人
做鼓舞人心的工作。

我现在的看法
是 Thomas 进入了哈佛、

杜克和宾大——

(笑声

) 他在 Cytonet 有一份工作

,他有同事

,也有在各自领域处于领先地位的同事。

他们需要
他来完成他们的工作。

曾经看似短暂而微不足道的生活,却

显露出生命力、
永恒和相关性。

我只希望我的生活
也能如此重要。

谢谢你。

(掌声)