What really matters at the end of life BJ Miller

Well, we all need a reason to wake up.

For me, it just took 11,000 volts.

I know you’re too polite to ask,

so I will tell you.

One night, sophomore year of college,

just back from Thanksgiving holiday,

a few of my friends and I
were horsing around,

and we decided to climb atop
a parked commuter train.

It was just sitting there,
with the wires that run overhead.

Somehow, that seemed
like a great idea at the time.

We’d certainly done stupider things.

I scurried up the ladder on the back,

and when I stood up,

the electrical current entered my arm,

blew down and out my feet,
and that was that.

Would you believe that watch still works?

Takes a licking!

(Laughter)

My father wears it now in solidarity.

That night began my formal relationship
with death – my death –

and it also began
my long run as a patient.

It’s a good word.

It means one who suffers.

So I guess we’re all patients.

Now, the American health care system

has more than its fair share
of dysfunction –

to match its brilliance, to be sure.

I’m a physician now,
a hospice and palliative medicine doc,

so I’ve seen care from both sides.

And believe me: almost everyone
who goes into healthcare

really means well – I mean, truly.

But we who work in it
are also unwitting agents

for a system that too often
does not serve.

Why?

Well, there’s actually a pretty easy
answer to that question,

and it explains a lot:

because healthcare was designed
with diseases, not people, at its center.

Which is to say, of course,
it was badly designed.

And nowhere are the effects
of bad design more heartbreaking

or the opportunity
for good design more compelling

than at the end of life,

where things are so distilled
and concentrated.

There are no do-overs.

My purpose today is
to reach out across disciplines

and invite design thinking
into this big conversation.

That is, to bring intention and creativity

to the experience of dying.

We have a monumental
opportunity in front of us,

before one of the few universal issues

as individuals as well as a civil society:

to rethink and redesign how it is we die.

So let’s begin at the end.

For most people, the scariest thing
about death isn’t being dead,

it’s dying, suffering.

It’s a key distinction.

To get underneath this,
it can be very helpful

to tease out suffering
which is necessary as it is,

from suffering we can change.

The former is a natural,
essential part of life, part of the deal,

and to this we are called
to make space, adjust, grow.

It can be really good
to realize forces larger than ourselves.

They bring proportionality,

like a cosmic right-sizing.

After my limbs were gone,

that loss, for example,
became fact, fixed –

necessarily part of my life,

and I learned that I could no more
reject this fact than reject myself.

It took me a while,
but I learned it eventually.

Now, another great thing
about necessary suffering

is that it is the very thing

that unites caregiver and care receiver –

human beings.

This, we are finally realizing,
is where healing happens.

Yes, compassion – literally,
as we learned yesterday –

suffering together.

Now, on the systems side,
on the other hand,

so much of the suffering
is unnecessary, invented.

It serves no good purpose.

But the good news is,
since this brand of suffering is made up,

well, we can change it.

How we die is indeed
something we can affect.

Making the system sensitive
to this fundamental distinction

between necessary
and unnecessary suffering

gives us our first of three
design cues for the day.

After all, our role as caregivers,
as people who care,

is to relieve suffering –
not add to the pile.

True to the tenets of palliative care,

I function as something
of a reflective advocate,

as much as prescribing physician.

Quick aside: palliative care – a very
important field but poorly understood –

while it includes, it is not
limited to end of life care.

It is not limited to hospice.

It’s simply about comfort
and living well at any stage.

So please know that you don’t
have to be dying anytime soon

to benefit from palliative care.

Now, let me introduce you to Frank.

Sort of makes this point.

I’ve been seeing Frank now for years.

He’s living with advancing prostate cancer
on top of long-standing HIV.

We work on his bone pain and his fatigue,

but most of the time we spend thinking
out loud together about his life –

really, about our lives.

In this way, Frank grieves.

In this way, he keeps up with
his losses as they roll in,

so that he’s ready to take in
the next moment.

Loss is one thing,
but regret, quite another.

Frank has always been an adventurer –

he looks like something
out of a Norman Rockwell painting –

and no fan of regret.

So it wasn’t surprising
when he came into clinic one day,

saying he wanted to raft
down the Colorado River.

Was this a good idea?

With all the risks to his safety
and his health, some would say no.

Many did, but he went for it,
while he still could.

It was a glorious, marvelous trip:

freezing water, blistering dry heat,
scorpions, snakes,

wildlife howling off the flaming walls
of the Grand Canyon –

all the glorious side of the world
beyond our control.

Frank’s decision, while maybe dramatic,

is exactly the kind
so many of us would make,

if we only had the support to figure out
what is best for ourselves over time.

So much of what we’re talking about today
is a shift in perspective.

After my accident,
when I went back to college,

I changed my major to art history.

Studying visual art, I figured
I’d learn something about how to see –

a really potent lesson
for a kid who couldn’t change

so much of what he was seeing.

Perspective, that kind of alchemy
we humans get to play with,

turning anguish into a flower.

Flash forward: now I work
at an amazing place in San Francisco

called the Zen Hospice Project,

where we have a little ritual
that helps with this shift in perspective.

When one of our residents dies,

the mortuary men come, and as we’re
wheeling the body out through the garden,

heading for the gate, we pause.

Anyone who wants –

fellow residents, family,
nurses, volunteers,

the hearse drivers too, now –

shares a story or a song or silence,

as we sprinkle the body
with flower petals.

It takes a few minutes;

it’s a sweet, simple parting image
to usher in grief with warmth,

rather than repugnance.

Contrast that with the typical experience
in the hospital setting,

much like this – floodlit room
lined with tubes and beeping machines

and blinking lights that don’t stop
even when the patient’s life has.

Cleaning crew swoops in,
the body’s whisked away,

and it all feels as though that person
had never really existed.

Well-intended, of course,
in the name of sterility,

but hospitals tend to assault our senses,

and the most we might hope for
within those walls is numbness –

anesthetic, literally
the opposite of aesthetic.

I revere hospitals for what they can do;
I am alive because of them.

But we ask too much of our hospitals.

They are places for acute trauma
and treatable illness.

They are no place to live and die;
that’s not what they were designed for.

Now mind you – I am not
giving up on the notion

that our institutions
can become more humane.

Beauty can be found anywhere.

I spent a few months in a burn unit

at St. Barnabas Hospital
in Livingston, New Jersey,

where I got really
great care at every turn,

including good
palliative care for my pain.

And one night, it began to snow outside.

I remember my nurses
complaining about driving through it.

And there was no window in my room,

but it was great to just imagine it
coming down all sticky.

Next day, one of my nurses
smuggled in a snowball for me.

She brought it in to the unit.

I cannot tell you the rapture I felt
holding that in my hand,

and the coldness dripping
onto my burning skin;

the miracle of it all,

the fascination as I watched it melt
and turn into water.

In that moment,

just being any part of this planet
in this universe mattered more to me

than whether I lived or died.

That little snowball packed
all the inspiration I needed

to both try to live
and be OK if I did not.

In a hospital, that’s a stolen moment.

In my work over the years,
I’ve known many people

who were ready to go, ready to die.

Not because they had found
some final peace or transcendence,

but because they were so repulsed
by what their lives had become –

in a word, cut off, or ugly.

There are already record numbers of us
living with chronic and terminal illness,

and into ever older age.

And we are nowhere near ready
or prepared for this silver tsunami.

We need an infrastructure
dynamic enough to handle

these seismic shifts in our population.

Now is the time to create
something new, something vital.

I know we can because we have to.

The alternative is just unacceptable.

And the key ingredients are known:

policy, education and training,

systems, bricks and mortar.

We have tons of input
for designers of all stripes to work with.

We know, for example, from research

what’s most important to people
who are closer to death:

comfort; feeling unburdened
and unburdening to those they love;

existential peace; and a sense
of wonderment and spirituality.

Over Zen Hospice’s nearly 30 years,

we’ve learned much more
from our residents in subtle detail.

Little things aren’t so little.

Take Janette.

She finds it harder to breathe
one day to the next due to ALS.

Well, guess what?

She wants to start smoking again –

and French cigarettes, if you please.

Not out of some self-destructive bent,

but to feel her lungs filled
while she has them.

Priorities change.

Or Kate – she just wants to know

her dog Austin is lying
at the foot of her bed,

his cold muzzle against her dry skin,

instead of more chemotherapy
coursing through her veins –

she’s done that.

Sensuous, aesthetic gratification,
where in a moment, in an instant,

we are rewarded for just being.

So much of it comes down to
loving our time by way of the senses,

by way of the body – the very thing
doing the living and the dying.

Probably the most poignant room

in the Zen Hospice guest house
is our kitchen,

which is a little strange when you realize

that so many of our residents
can eat very little, if anything at all.

But we realize we are providing
sustenance on several levels:

smell, a symbolic plane.

Seriously, with all the heavy-duty stuff
happening under our roof,

one of the most tried and true
interventions we know of,

is to bake cookies.

As long as we have our senses –

even just one –

we have at least
the possibility of accessing

what makes us feel human, connected.

Imagine the ripples of this notion

for the millions of people
living and dying with dementia.

Primal sensorial delights that say
the things we don’t have words for,

impulses that make us stay present –

no need for a past or a future.

So, if teasing unnecessary suffering out
of the system was our first design cue,

then tending to dignity
by way of the senses,

by way of the body –
the aesthetic realm –

is design cue number two.

Now this gets us quickly to the third
and final bit for today;

namely, we need to lift our sights,
to set our sights on well-being,

so that life and health and healthcare

can become about making life
more wonderful,

rather than just less horrible.

Beneficence.

Here, this gets right at the distinction

between a disease-centered and a patient-
or human-centered model of care,

and here is where caring
becomes a creative, generative,

even playful act.

“Play” may sound like a funny word here.

But it is also one of our
highest forms of adaptation.

Consider every major compulsory effort
it takes to be human.

The need for food has birthed cuisine.

The need for shelter
has given rise to architecture.

The need for cover, fashion.

And for being subjected to the clock,

well, we invented music.

So, since dying
is a necessary part of life,

what might we create with this fact?

By “play” I am in no way suggesting
we take a light approach to dying

or that we mandate
any particular way of dying.

There are mountains of sorrow
that cannot move,

and one way or another,
we will all kneel there.

Rather, I am asking that we make space –

physical, psychic room, to allow life
to play itself all the way out –

so that rather than just
getting out of the way,

aging and dying can become
a process of crescendo through to the end.

We can’t solve for death.

I know some of you are working on this.

(Laughter)

Meanwhile, we can –

(Laughter)

We can design towards it.

Parts of me died early on,

and that’s something we can all say
one way or another.

I got to redesign my life
around this fact,

and I tell you it has been a liberation

to realize you can always find
a shock of beauty or meaning

in what life you have left,

like that snowball lasting
for a perfect moment,

all the while melting away.

If we love such moments ferociously,

then maybe we can learn to live well –

not in spite of death,

but because of it.

Let death be what takes us,

not lack of imagination.

Thank you.

(Applause)

好吧,我们都需要一个醒来的理由。

对我来说,它只需要 11,000 伏。

我知道你太客气了,

所以我会告诉你的。

大学二年级的一个晚上,

刚从感恩节假期回来

,我和几个朋友
在闲逛

,我们决定爬上
一辆停着的通勤列车。

它只是坐在那里
,电线在头顶运行。

不知何故,这
在当时似乎是个好主意。

我们肯定做过更愚蠢的事情。

我急忙爬上背上的梯子

,当我站起来时

,电流进入我的手臂,

吹落到我的脚上
,就是这样。

你相信手表还能用吗?

需要舔!

(笑声)

我父亲现在穿着它是为了团结一致。

那天晚上开始了我
与死亡的正式关系——我的死亡

——它也开始了
我作为病人的长期生活。

这是个好词。

意思是受苦的人。

所以我想我们都是病人。

现在,美国医疗保健系统的功能失调

已远远超过其公平
份额——

可以肯定的是,与它的辉煌相匹配。

我现在是一名医生,
一名临终关怀和姑息治疗医生,

所以我看到了双方的护理。

相信我:几乎
所有进入医疗保健行业的人都

非常好——我的意思是,真的。

但是我们在其中工作的人

也是一个经常不服务的系统的不知情的代理人

为什么?

嗯,这个问题实际上有一个非常简单的
答案

,它解释了很多:

因为医疗保健
是以疾病而不是人为中心设计的。

也就是说,当然,
它设计得很糟糕。

糟糕的设计带来的影响最令人心碎,

或者
优秀设计的机会

比生命的尽头更引人注目,

那里的东西如此
浓缩和浓缩。

没有重做。

我今天的目的
是跨学科接触,

并邀请设计思维参与
这场大对话。

也就是说,将意图和创造力

带入死亡体验。

在作为个人和公民社会

为数不多的普遍问题之一面前,我们面前有一个巨大的机会

重新思考和重新设计我们的死亡方式。

所以让我们从最后开始。

对大多数人来说,死亡最可怕
的不是死,

而是死去,受苦。

这是一个关键的区别。

为了深入了解这一点,从
我们可以改变的痛苦

中梳理出
必要的痛苦是非常有帮助的

前者
是生活中自然而重要的一部分,是交易的一部分

,为此我们被
要求腾出空间、调整和成长。

意识到比我们更大的力量真的很好。

它们带来了比例性,

就像宇宙中的正确尺寸。 例如,

在我的四肢消失后

,这种损失
就变成了事实,成为了固定的——

必然成为我生活的一部分

,我了解到我不能
拒绝这个事实,就像拒绝自己一样。

我花了一段时间,
但最终我学会了。

现在,
关于必要的痛苦的另一个伟大

的事情是,它正是

将照顾者和被照顾者——人类团结在一起的东西

我们终于意识到,这
就是治愈发生的地方。

是的,慈悲——实际上,
正如我们昨天学到的——

一起受苦。

现在,在系统方面,
另一方面,

这么多的痛苦
是不必要的,是发明的。

它没有什么好的目的。

但好消息是,
既然这种痛苦是编造的,

那么,我们可以改变它。

我们如何死确实
是我们可以影响的事情。

使系统对必要和不必要的痛苦之间的
这种基本区别敏感,

为我们
提供了当天的三个设计线索中的第一个。

毕竟,我们作为照顾者,作为照顾者的角色

是减轻痛苦——
而不是增加痛苦。

忠实于姑息治疗的原则,

我扮演
着反思倡导者的角色,

就像开处方的医生一样。

顺便说一句:姑息治疗——一个非常
重要但知之甚少的领域——

虽然它包括但
不限于临终关怀。

它不仅限于临终关怀。

这只是关于
在任何阶段的舒适和生活。

所以请注意,您
不必很快就死去

,也可以从姑息治疗中受益。

现在,让我把你介绍给弗兰克。

有点说明了这一点。

我已经看到弗兰克多年了。

除了长期存在的艾滋病毒之外,他还患有晚期前列腺癌。

我们研究他的骨痛和疲劳,

但大部分时间我们
一起大声思考他的生活——

真的,关于我们的生活。

就这样,弗兰克感到悲伤。

通过这种方式,他
在损失滚滚时跟上他的损失,

以便他准备好
迎接下一个时刻。

失去是一回事,
后悔又是另一回事。

弗兰克一直是个冒险家——

他看起来
就像是诺曼·洛克威尔的画作

——从不后悔。

所以
有一天他来到诊所,

说他想
漂流科罗拉多河,这并不奇怪。

这是个好主意吗?

鉴于他的安全和健康面临所有风险
,有些人会说不。

许多人做到了,但他坚持了下来,
尽管他仍然可以。

这是一次光荣而奇妙的旅行:

冰冷的水,酷热的干热,
蝎子,蛇,

野生动物
在大峡谷燃烧的墙壁上嚎叫——

世界上所有
我们无法控制的光辉一面。

弗兰克的决定,虽然可能是戏剧性的,但

正是我们很多人会做出的决定,

如果我们能得到支持,
随着时间的推移找出最适合自己的东西。

我们今天谈论的很多内容
都是视角的转变。

事故发生后,
当我回到大学时,

我将专业改为艺术史。

学习视觉艺术,我想
我会学到一些关于如何看的东西——

对于一个无法

改变他所看到的东西的孩子来说,这是一个非常有效的课程。

透视,
我们人类可以玩的那种炼金术,

把痛苦变成一朵花。

闪现:现在我
在旧金山一个

名为 Zen Hospice Project 的神奇地方工作,

在那里我们有一个小小的仪式
来帮助这种视角的转变。

当我们的一个居民去世时

,太平间的人来了,当我们将
尸体推过花园,

走向大门时,我们停了下来。

任何想要的人——

同胞、家人、
护士、志愿者

、灵车司机,现在——

分享一个故事、一首歌或沉默,

当我们用花瓣洒在身体
上时。

需要几分钟;

这是一个甜蜜,简单的离别形象
,以温暖

而不是反感来迎接悲伤。

与医院环境中的典型体验形成鲜明对比,

就像这样——泛光灯照明的房间里
排满了管子、哔哔声的机器

和闪烁的灯,
即使病人的生命有生命也不会停止。

清洁人员猛扑进来
,尸体被带走

,这一切都让人感觉那个人
从未真正存在过。

当然,
以不育的名义是出于好意,

但医院往往会攻击我们的感官,

而我们
在这些围墙内所希望的最多的是麻木——

麻醉剂,
实际上与审美相反。

我尊重医院的能力;
我因为他们而活着。

但是我们对医院的要求太多了。

它们是急性创伤
和可治疗疾病的场所。

它们不是生死之地;
这不是他们的设计目的。

现在请注意——我并没有
放弃

我们的机构
可以变得更加人道的想法。

美无处不在。

我在新泽西州利文斯顿的圣巴纳巴斯医院的烧伤科住了几个月,在

那里我
每时每刻都得到了很好的照顾,

包括
对我的疼痛进行良好的姑息治疗。

一天晚上,外面开始下雪了。

我记得我的护士
抱怨开车穿过它。

我的房间里没有窗户,

但想象一下它
全都粘下来真是太好了。

第二天,我的一位护士
偷偷带了一个雪球给我。

她把它带到了单位。

我无法告诉你
我把它握在手中

的欣喜若狂,以及滴
在我灼热的皮肤上的冰冷;

这一切的奇迹,

当我看着它融化
并变成水时的魅力。

在那一刻,

在这个宇宙中成为这个星球的任何一部分
对我来说

比我是生是死更重要。

那个小雪球包含
了我所需要的所有灵感,让我

努力生活
,如果我不这样做,我也会好起来的。

在医院里,那是一个偷来的时刻。

在我这些年的工作中,
我认识了许多

准备出发、准备死亡的人。

不是因为他们找到
了最终的平静或超越,

而是
因为他们对自己的生活变得如此厌恶

——总之,被切断或丑陋。

我们已经有创纪录的数量
患有慢性病和绝症,

并且年龄越来越大。

我们还远远没有
为这场银色海啸做好准备。

我们需要一个足够动态的基础设施
来应对

我们人口中的这些地震变化。

现在是时候创造
一些新的、重要的东西了。

我知道我们可以,因为我们必须这样做。

替代方案是不可接受的。

关键要素是众所周知的:

政策、教育和培训、

系统、实体。

我们有大量的输入
供各行各业的设计师使用。

例如,我们从研究中了解到,对于濒临死亡的

人来说,最重要的是什么

舒适;
对他们所爱的人感到无负担和无负担;

存在和平; 以及一种
惊奇和灵性的感觉。

在 Zen Hospice 近 30 年的时间里,

我们从居民身上学到了很多
细微的细节。

小东西不是那么小。

以珍妮特为例。

由于 ALS,她发现一天到一天呼吸困难。

好吧,你猜怎么着?

她想重新开始抽烟——

如果你愿意,还想抽法国香烟。

不是出于某种自我毁灭的倾向,

而是在她拥有它们的同时感觉她的肺充满了
它们。

优先事项发生变化。

或者凯特——她只是想知道

她的狗奥斯汀正躺在
她的床脚,

他冰冷的嘴贴在她干燥的皮肤上,

而不是更多的化疗
药物流过她的血管——

她已经做到了。

感性的、审美的满足
,在瞬间,瞬间,

我们因存在而得到回报。

这很大程度上归结为
通过感官,通过身体来爱我们的时间

——这正是决定
生与死的事情。 Zen Hospice 招待所中

最令人心酸的房间可能

是我们的厨房,

当你

意识到我们这么多的
居民吃得很少,如果有的话,这有点奇怪。

但我们意识到我们
在几个层面上提供营养:

气味,一个象征性的平面。

说真的,
在我们的屋檐下发生的所有繁重的事情,

我们所知道的最尝试和最真实的
干预措施之一

就是烤饼干。

只要我们有我们的感官——

即使只有一种——

我们至少
有可能接触

到让我们感到人性化、相互联系的东西。

想象一下这个概念

对数以百万计的
痴呆症患者的影响。

原始的感官愉悦,
说出我们无法形容的事情

,让我们留在当下的冲动——

不需要过去或未来。

所以,如果从系统中挑逗不必要的痛苦
是我们的第一个设计线索,

那么
通过感官、

通过身体
——审美领域——

来维护尊严是第二个设计线索。

现在,这让我们很快进入了今天的第三个
也是最后一点;

也就是说,我们需要提升我们的视野,
把目光投向幸福,

这样生活、健康和医疗保健

才能让生活
变得更美好,

而不仅仅是变得不那么可怕。

善行。

在这里,这正好

区分了以疾病为中心和以患者
或以人为中心的护理模式之间的区别

,在这里,护理
成为一种创造性的、生成的,

甚至是有趣的行为。

“玩”在这里听起来像是一个有趣的词。

但它也是我们
最高的适应形式之一。

考虑一下成为人类所需的每一项重大的强制性努力

对食物的需求催生了美食。

对庇护所的需求
催生了建筑。

需要封面,时尚。

由于受到时钟的影响

,我们发明了音乐。

那么,既然死亡
是生命中必不可少的一部分,

那么我们可以利用这个事实创造什么?

通过“玩”,我绝不是建议
我们对死亡采取轻松的态度,

或者我们要求
任何特定的死亡方式。

有无法移动的悲伤之山

,无论如何,
我们都会跪在那里。

相反,我要求我们腾出空间——

物理的、心理的空间,让
生命一直发挥自己的作用——

这样,

衰老和死亡不仅仅是让开,而是
一个渐强的过程,直到 结束。

我们无法解决死亡。

我知道你们中的一些人正在为此努力。

(笑声)

同时,我们可以——

(笑声)

我们可以针对它进行设计。

我的一部分很早就死了

,这是我们都可以
这样或那样说的事情。

我必须围绕这个事实重新设计我的生活

,我告诉你

,意识到你总能

在你所剩下的生活中找到一种美丽或意义的震撼,

就像雪球一直
持续一个完美的时刻一样,

这是一种解放 熔化掉。

如果我们狂热地热爱这样的时刻,

那么也许我们可以学会活得好——

不是因为死亡,

而是因为它。

让死亡成为我们的主宰,

而不是缺乏想象力。

谢谢你。

(掌声)