Free yourself from your filter bubbles Joan Blades and John Gable

Joan Blades: Do you have
politically diverse friends?

What do you talk about with them?

I’m a progressive; I live
in a town full of progressives,

and 15 years ago, I didn’t have
any conservative friends.

Now I have a wonderful mix of friends,

and they include John.

John Gable: I am not a progressive.

I’m a Republican who grew up
in a Republican family

in the conservative South,

and even worked in Republican politics,
locally and at the national level.

But the last 24 years,
I’ve been in technology

and living in a very progressive area.

So I have a lot of progressive friends,

including Joan.

JB: I was born in Berkeley, California,

a notoriously progressive college town.

And I live there now.

In 1998, six months into the Monica
Lewinsky-Clinton impeachment scandal,

I helped cofound MoveOn.org
with a one-sentence petition:

“Congress must immediately
censure the president

and move on to pressing issues
facing the nation.”

Now, that was actually
a very unifying petition in many ways.

You could love Clinton or hate Clinton

and agree that the best thing
for the country was to move on.

As the leader of MoveOn,
I saw the polarization just continue.

And I found myself wondering

why I saw things so differently

than many people
in other parts of the country.

So in 2005, when I had an opportunity
to get together with grassroots leaders

across the political divide,

I grabbed it.

And I became friends with a lot of people

I never had a chance to talk to before.

And that included leadership
in the Christian Coalition,

often seen as on the right
the way MoveOn is seen as on the left.

And this lead to me
showing up on Capitol Hill

with one of the Christian Coalition
leaders, my friend,

to lobby for net neutrality.

That was powerful.

We turned heads.

So this work was transformational for me.

And I found myself wondering:

How could vast numbers of people
have the opportunity

to really connect with people
that have very different views?

JG: I was born Oneida, Tennessee,

right across the state border
from a small coal mining town,

Stearns, Kentucky.

And I lived there
for the first few years of my life,

before moving to another small town,
Frankfort, Kentucky.

Basically, I grew up
in small-town America,

conservative at its heart.

Now, Stearns and Berkeley –
they’re a little different.

(Laughter)

So in the ’90s I moved out west
to a progressive area

to work in technology –

worked at Microsoft, worked at Netscape.

I actually became the product manager lead
for Netscape Navigator,

the first popular web browser.

Now in the early days of the internet,

we were just moved
and inspired by a vision:

when we’re connected to all
these different people around the world

and all these different ideas,

we’ll be able to make great decisions,

and we’ll be able to appreciate each other

for the beautiful diversity
that the whole world has to offer.

Now I also, 20 years ago, gave a speech

saying it might not work out that way,

that we might actually be trained
to discriminate against each other

in new ways.

So what happened?

It’s not like we just woke up one day
and decided to hate each other more.

Here’s what happened.

There’s just too much noise –
too many people, too many ideas –

so we use technology
to filter it out a little bit.

And what happens?

It lets in ideas I already agree with.

It lets in the popular ideas,

it lets in people just like me
who think just like me.

That sounds kind of good, right?

Well, not necessarily,

because two very scary things happen

when we have such narrow worldviews.

First, we become more extreme
in our beliefs.

Second, we become less tolerant
of anybody who’s different than we are.

Does this sound familiar?

Does this sound like modern America?
The modern world?

Well, the good news is
that technology is changing,

and it could change for the better.

And that’s, in fact,
why I started AllSides.com –

to create technologies and services
to free us from these filter bubbles.

The very first thing we did was create
technology that identifies bias,

so we could show different
perspectives side by side

to free us from the filter
bubbles of news media.

And then I met Joan.

JB: So I met John outside
of Washington, DC,

with an idealistic group
of cross-partisan bridge builders,

and we wanted to re-weave
the fabric of our communities.

We believe that our differences
can be a strength,

that our values can be complimentary

and that we have to overcome the fight

so that we can honor everyone’s values

and not lose any of our own.

I went for this wonderful walk with John,

where I started learning
about the work he was doing

to pierce the filter bubble.

It was powerful;

it was brilliant.

Living in separate narratives is not good.

We can’t even have a conversation
or do collaborative problem-solving

when we don’t share the same facts.

JG: So one thing you take away from today

is if Joan Blades asks you
to go on a walk,

go on that walk.

(Laughter)

It changed things. It really changed
the way I was thinking about things.

To free ourselves from the filter bubbles,

we can’t just think about
information filter bubbles,

but also relationship
and social filter bubbles.

You see, we human beings – we’re not
nearly as smart as we think we are.

We don’t generally make
decisions intellectually.

We make them emotionally, intuitively,

and then we use our big old brains

to rationalize anything
we want to rationalize.

We’re not really like Vulcans
like Mr. Spock,

we’re more like bold cowboys
like Captain Kirk,

or passionate idealists like Dr. McCoy.

OK, for those of y’all who prefer
the new “Star Trek” crew,

here you go.

(Laughter)

JB: Don’t forget the strong women!

JG: Come on, strong women. OK.

JB: All right.

John and I are both “Star Trek” fans.

What’s not to love about a future
with that kind of optimism?

JG: And having a good future in mind
is a big deal – very important.

And understanding what the problem is
is very important.

But we have to do something.

So what do we do?

It’s actually not that hard.

We have to add diversity to our lives –

not just information,
but relationship diversity.

And by diversity,
I mean big “D” diversity,

not just racial and gender,
which are very important,

but also …

diversity of age, like young and old;

rural and urban;

liberal and conservative;

in the US, Democrat and Republican.

Now, one of the great examples
of somebody freeing themselves

from their filter bubbles

and getting a more diverse life

is, once again, next to me – Joan.

JB: So the question is:

Who among you has had
relationships lost or harmed

due to differences in politics,
religion or whatever?

Raise your hands.

Yeah.

This year I have talked to so many people

that have experienced that kind of loss.

I’ve seen tears well up in people’s eyes
as they talk about family members

from whom they’re estranged.

Living Room Conversations were designed

to begin to heal political
and personal differences.

They’re simple conversations

where two friends with different
viewpoints each invite two friends

for structured conversation,

where everyone’s agreed
to some simple ground rules:

curiosity, listening,
respect, taking turns –

everything we learned
in kindergarten, right?

Really easy.

So by the time you’re talking about
the topic you’ve agreed to talk about,

you actually have the sense that,

“You know, I kind of like this person,”

and you listen to each other differently.

That’s kind of a human condition;

we listen differently
to people we care about.

And then there’s reflection

and possibly next steps.

This is a deep listening practice;

it’s never a debate.

And that’s incredibly powerful.

These conversations
in our own living rooms

with people who have different viewpoints

are an incredible adventure.

We rediscover that we can respect
and even love people

that are different from us.

And it’s powerful.

JG: So, what are you curious about?

JB: What’s the conversation
you yearn to have?

JG: Let’s do this together.

Together.

JB: Yes.

(Laughter)

(Applause)

JB and JG: Thank you.

Joan Blades:你有
政治多元化的朋友吗?

你和他们谈什么?

我是一个进步主义者; 我住
在一个充满进步的小镇

,15年前,我没有
任何保守的朋友。

现在我有一群很棒的朋友

,其中包括约翰。

约翰盖博:我不是进步主义者。

我是一名共和党人,

在保守的南方共和党家庭长大,

甚至在
地方和国家一级的共和党政治中工作。

但在过去的 24 年里,
我一直从事技术工作

,生活在一个非常进步的领域。

所以我有很多进步的朋友,

包括琼。

JB:我出生在加州伯克利,

一个以进步着称的大学城。

我现在住在那里。

1998 年,在莫妮卡
·莱温斯基-克林顿弹劾丑闻发生六个月后,

我帮助共同创立了
MoveOn.org,提出了一份请愿书:

“国会必须立即
谴责总统,

并着手解决
国家面临的紧迫问题。”

现在,这实际上是
一个在很多方面非常统一的请愿书。

你可以爱克林顿,也可以恨克林顿,

并同意这个国家最好的
事情就是继续前进。

作为 MoveOn 的领导者,
我看到两极分化还在继续。

我发现自己想知道

为什么我对事情的看法

与该国其他地区的许多人如此不同。

所以在 2005 年,当我有
机会跨越政治鸿沟与基层领导人相聚时

我抓住了它。

我和很多以前从未有机会交谈的人成为了朋友

这包括
在基督教联盟中的领导,

通常被视为在右边,
而 MoveOn 被视为在左边。

这导致我

与一位基督教联盟
领导人,我的朋友一起出现在国会山

,游说网络中立。

那是强大的。

我们转过头来。

所以这项工作对我来说是变革性的。

我发现自己想知道:

大量的人如何有

机会真正与
持有不同观点的人建立联系?

JG:我出生在田纳西州的奥奈达,

就在肯塔基州斯特恩斯
的一个煤矿小镇对面

在我搬到肯塔基州法兰克福的另一个小镇之前,我在那里
生活了最初的几年

基本上,我
在美国小镇长大,

内心很保守。

现在,斯特恩斯和伯克利——
他们有点不同。

(笑声)

所以在 90 年代,我搬到了西部,
到一个进步的

地区从事技术工作——

在微软工作,在 Netscape 工作。

实际上,我成为

了第一个流行的网络浏览器 Netscape Navigator 的产品经理。

现在在互联网的早期,

我们只是
被一个愿景所感动和启发:

当我们与
世界各地所有这些不同的人

以及所有这些不同的想法建立联系时,

我们将能够做出伟大的决定,

并且我们 将能够互相欣赏

整个世界所提供的美丽多样性。

现在我也在 20 年前发表演讲

,说这样可能行不通

,我们实际上可能被训练

以新的方式相互歧视。

所以发生了什么事?

这不像我们只是有一天醒来
并决定更加憎恨对方。

这就是发生的事情。

噪音太多了——
太多的人,太多的想法——

所以我们用技术
把它过滤掉了一点。

会发生什么?

它允许我已经同意的想法。

它让流行的想法进入,

它让像我一样思考的人进入

这听起来不错,对吧?

好吧,不一定,

因为

当我们拥有如此狭隘的世界观时,会发生两件非常可怕的事情。

首先,
我们的信念变得更加极端。

其次,我们
对任何与我们不同的人变得不那么宽容。

这听起来很熟悉吗?

这听起来像现代美国吗?
现代世界?

好消息
是技术正在发生变化,

而且它可能会变得更好。

事实上,
这就是我创办 AllSides.com 的原因

——创造技术和服务,
让我们摆脱这些过滤泡沫。

我们做的第一件事是创造
识别偏见的技术,

这样我们就可以并排展示不同的
观点,

让我们摆脱
新闻媒体的过滤泡沫。

然后我遇到了琼。

JB:所以我在
华盛顿特区以外

遇到了约翰,和一群理想主义
的跨党派桥梁建设者一起

,我们想重新
编织我们社区的结构。

我们相信,我们的差异
可以成为一种力量

,我们的价值观可以互补

,我们必须战胜斗争,

这样我们才能尊重每个人的价值观,

而不会失去我们自己的任何价值观。

我和约翰一起进行了一次美妙的散步,

在那里我开始
了解他

为刺破过滤器气泡所做的工作。

它很强大;

那真是太棒了。

生活在不同的叙述中是不好的。

当我们不分享相同的事实时,我们甚至无法进行对话或协作解决问题。

JG:所以你从今天学到的一件事

是,如果琼·布莱兹让你
去散步,

那就去散步吧。

(笑声)

它改变了一切。 它真的改变
了我思考事情的方式。

为了摆脱过滤气泡,

我们不能只考虑
信息过滤气泡,

还要考虑关系
和社交过滤气泡。

你看,我们人类——
我们并不像我们想象的那么聪明。

我们通常不会理智地做出
决定。

我们在情感上、直觉上创造它们,

然后我们用我们古老的大脑

来合理化我们想要合理化的任何事情

我们不像斯波克先生那样的瓦肯人

我们更像是像柯克船长那样的大胆牛仔

或者像麦考伊博士那样充满激情的理想主义者。

好的,对于那些
喜欢新《星际迷航》剧组的人来说

,给你。

(笑声)

JB:别忘了坚强的女人!

JG:来吧,坚强的女人。 行。

JB:好的。

约翰和我都是《星际迷航》的粉丝。

怀着这种乐观态度,有什么不爱未来的呢?

JG:心中有一个美好的未来
是一件大事——非常重要。

了解问题
所在非常重要。

但我们必须做点什么。

那么我们该怎么办?

其实没那么难。

我们必须为我们的生活增添多样性——

不仅仅是信息,
还有关系的多样性。

我所说的多样性
是指大的“D”型多样性,

不仅仅是种族和性别,
这非常重要,

还有……

年龄的多样性,比如年轻人和老年人;

农村和城市;

自由主义和保守主义;

在美国,民主党和共和党。

现在,
让自己

摆脱过滤气泡

并获得更多样化生活的一个很好的例子

是,再一次,在我旁边——琼。

JB:所以问题是:

你们当中有谁

因为政治、
宗教或其他方面的差异而失去或伤害过关系?

举起手来。

是的。

今年,我与

许多经历过这种损失的人交谈过。

当人们谈论

与他们疏远的家庭成员时,我看到人们眼里充满了泪水。

客厅对话

旨在开始治愈政治
和个人差异。

它们是简单的对话

,两个观点不同的朋友
各自邀请两个朋友

进行结构化对话

,每个人都
同意一些简单的基本规则:

好奇心、倾听、
尊重、轮流——

我们在幼儿园学到的一切
,对吧?

真的很容易。

所以当你谈论
你同意谈论的话题时,

你实际上有一种感觉,

“你知道,我有点喜欢这个人”,

并且你们以不同的方式倾听对方。

这是一种人类的状况。

我们以不同的
方式倾听我们关心的人。

然后是反思

和可能的后续步骤。

这是一种深度聆听练习;

这从来都不是辩论。

这是非常强大的。

这些
在我们自己的客厅里

与不同观点的人进行的对话

是一次令人难以置信的冒险。

我们重新发现我们可以尊重
甚至爱

与我们不同的人。

而且它很强大。

JG:那么,你对什么感到好奇?

JB:
你渴望进行什么样的对话?

JG:让我们一起做这件事。

一起。

JB:是的。

(笑声)

(掌声)

JB 和 JG:谢谢。