Listening Ourselves Out of Polarization

[Music]

hi

today i’d like to talk to you about

the polarization in our world and

the solution to that a new language we

should learn

the triple e language we live in a

divided world

there’s a tsunami of polarization we

have discussions and debates

and the debates are win-lose

i am right you are wrong it’s all about

my views

my perceptions are elevated to the truth

and even the intolerance is even that

far going that we cannot imagine that

something else could be thought

that the other thoughts are

inconceivable we see it also on social

media

where the positional thinking and

discussion like

twitter is going wild and

this has emerged obviously

to a large extent with the trumpest era

in the united states but even before

that even here in belgium where we have

decades and decades of experience with

discussions

between the flemish and the francophones

but not

understanding each other and it’s gotten

worse

with all the challenges that touch us as

a society

climate energy and recently covet 19 how

to deal with corona

discussions where everyone is starting

from their own right their

own position and there’s no listening

towards each other and

we see it also at universities there’s

many many polarizations

and debates in the academ academic world

and you you know you want to you want to

get an example there’s plenty of

examples

and i don’t want to give an example

because the moment i give an example

the polarization will start and i’m here

sitting in a monologue

and we need a dialogue to get

over this polarization so we are trapped

into a divided world and we

need to get out and the solution to get

out is precisely

to try to engage in a true dialogue

and to do that you need to learn and to

speak

a new language it’s a triple e language

the esperanto

of emotions and empathy i i once wrote

that we should start with this in

kindergarten

we don’t we’ve never learned that

language and so

i think there’s no better place than

university to start

learning and experimenting experimenting

with this new language

so university i’m sitting here in my

office at the university of leuven

this is a university that was

established

in 1425 we’re almost six centuries

around and so in the middle ages

universities were a community of

scholars and students

a learning community and in the early

ages

first universities in europe like

bologna and paris were about the 12th

century even

there were no buildings there was

university was

um without physical space a connection

a bonding of scholars and students a

community

and i think corona if corona has thought

is one thing

it is that we can that we don’t need

buildings and physical spaces that we

can go

beyond the the boundaries of buildings

and that we can connect

with each other in the digital world and

that’s where i think we should start

the new true dialogue dialogue what is

it

because i say the polarization and the

divide comes from discussion

debate win-lose positional thinking

dialogue is something totally different

dia in greek

through the words and in ancient greek

logos may even refer to gathering

together

relationships so it’s a dialogue is a

stream

is a flow of meaning a flow of words

between and true and among us and it is

like

where through such connection

in relationships between people

through such connections all the

differences of opinions

kind of evaporate and emerge into a new

meaning

dialogue is not about

getting my opinion as

the the truth dialogue is more about

suspending my opinion and listening to

other opinions and views

and then together find with creativity

a new way a new understanding a new

connection so there’s others saying that

dialogue is like the outer counterpart

of the inner non-judgmental awareness

and mindfulness

it is the connection and the

communication you make by the

the miracle of wonder by the questioning

by opening up yourself and not sticking

to your own positions and opinions

and you may say well you know this all

sounds nice but it’s very

abstract so let’s make it more concrete

how can we

engage in a true dialogue that is by

speaking a new language

the triple e language of the esperanto

of emotions and empathy so how do we do

that

what what does that exactly mean uh

emotions and empathy and speaking that

new language it’s through active

listening

so let’s first think about what empathy

is there’s a lot of misunderstanding on

empathy

some confuse it with sympathy it’s not

sympathy

it’s not agreeing my my mentor

and and professor and friend professor

nukin

he many years ago told me i’ll i can

demonstrate empathy

as a jewish law professor at harvard law

school to

a nazi ss officer so that’s certainly

not sympathy

or agreeing it’s demonstrating that you

can see

the world through the eyes of that other

person that you can

understand their perspective on things

and so when we try to connect

we need to try to listen actively

and you may say well i’m doing that well

you’re not because

and and i certainly can witness that i

often don’t do it and maybe even now at

this very moment you’re watching this

clip

you are not really listening to me

you are in your head thinking lots of

things and you may be referring to

experience you had

and you may be maybe even daydreaming or

you may try to find arguments against

what i’m saying

or you may say that’s not like me or oh

i know all of this

whatever you’re thinking you’re not

listening to me

active listening is about shutting up

your inner voice

it’s about getting out of this

judgmental

biased perception of the world it’s

about opening up

and really be with the other side you

know we all

judge all the time and judging obviously

has a benefit as a shortcut in a

dangerous society to protect yourself

society today is a bit less dangerous so

we we should judge less but we are still

stuck with the judging

and so when we see another person when

we engage and and talk with another

person

we immediately start judging from our

own perceptions and our biases everyone

who read canaan and turski knows about

the biases

and the tunnel vision we have and so we

should

try with active listening get rid of

these judgments

the other person is a diamond with one

thousand facets how can we

judge that person if we only see three

facets

and then you can ask but okay how do i

do that

i tried to shut up my inner voice i

tried to be with the other side and i

tried to really

listen and demonstrate my empathy

we do that by using the empathy loop

ipa is not only a beer it’s also

a very interesting skill to try to

listen to someone

inquire with open questions paraphrase

what you hear in your own words

check in so that i can adapt and

fine-tune and correct you if you didn’t

get it right

and then acknowledge the feelings you

see and hear and feel

and what will happen if you do that in a

genuine way is that other that other

person will feel understood

acknowledged they will become more

positive

he will share information and views and

perceptions

and at some point they will open up and

then you will be able to give your views

so in that sense the the active

listening

is a tool to generally connect with

someone else and i use

often the frozen land metaphor to

explain this better

imagine you see a farmer standing on a

frozen land

with a big bag of seeds and he’s

throwing all his seeds

on that land you will probably say hmm

this is a silly man why and then the

silly man tells you no no no i’m

throwing my seeds

flowers and vegetables will grow and you

think that’s silly the ground is frozen

well you know that’s exactly what you

and i do

when we listen when we try to persuade

someone

with our arguments we are like the silly

farmer throwing seeds on the frozen land

so active listening and empathy is about

working on the land opening it up

defrosting it

fertilizing it so that the other side

feels acknowledged

and then you can bring in your arguments

your seeds and see

if you can get somewhere with a dialogue

um it’s also about the emotions

in the active listening i like the you

know we are

95 emotions and we are very

emotional beings and i like the saying

of douglas null who says let’s

listen each other into existence which

means

i see it you are frustrated you are

disappointed you are angry

you are hurt you are

you know you’re irritated you’re

frustrated you’re happy

when i can do this in a genuine way

i connect with you and with your soul in

a

i i listen yourself into existence

and when we do that together for each

other that’s when we speak the new

language

and that’s where we engage in a dialogue

where something new will emerge

it’s like when we start the conversation

and i have a glass of water and you have

a glass of water

by doing this we kind of end up with a

new glass

of liquids where there’s some of mine

and some of your water but something

totally new

has emerged and then

you know universities should stimulate

that that kind of dialogue

learn us to speak that language of true

understanding and empathy

and listening to each other and

universities can stimulate that

by creating safe spaces safe spaces it’s

a delicate topic

it has many meanings there is the safe

space

where people who have been historically

discriminated against can

be together in a safe way where there’s

no judgments

and where they can support each other i

think universities should create

environments like that where you can

feel the empathy

and work on the emotional

security that you deserve and the

support you deserve for the wounds

and the hurt that has been committed in

so many many many instances

and then the university should also

create a safe space where the real true

dialogue

can emerge it’s a safe space where

differences of opinions

are flowing and floating around where

there’s differences of beliefs

and where there’s a safety

where that protects you uh to

to to be able to engage in free speech

safety

you know you will be tolerated there

will be respect and empathy for your

views and opinions

and so it at the same time it’s a

non-safe space because you can

engage in a non-safe dialogue you can

talk about

very delicate and intense things and

you’re sure

that there’s psychological safety for

you to speak up

and there will be respect for your views

and tolerance

and if you have this this dialogue of

empathy for each other then

uh what will happen is that this this

connection uh this dialogues this

thinking true relationships

will emerge and there will be a

connection

in free speech so for me the protection

of free speech

is not so much as it was uh

defended in the enlightenment the the

right for you to insult me the right for

you to offend me i think

we we kind of took it to the next level

where the free speech is about

i could say what my views are my

opinions are because

i’m in a safe place where you

will give me the empathy and i will give

you the empathy and we will respectfully

listen to each other talk with each

other with not to each other

we will dialogue and a new meaning will

emerge so

my hope and my call for all academics

and and students in universities around

the globe is that we together we engage

in speaking this new triple e language

the esperanto of

emotions and empathy that we stop

discussing that we stop debating that we

stop

positional argumentations that we stop

the intolerance that we start

really connecting and listening to each

other with empathy

that is what universities are about

creating new understanding in research

creating new understanding in

relationships in connections with people

and that is what we as academics can

contribute to society

a society that is in desperate need for

guidance to escape

out of the polarization that is softly

killing all of us

so let’s speak up together tripoli thank

you

[音乐]

嗨,

今天我想和你谈谈

我们世界的两极分化

以及解决这个问题的方法 一门新语言 我们

应该

学习三重 e 语言 我们生活在一个

分裂的世界

里 两极分化的海啸 我们

进行了讨论和辩论

辩论是输赢

我是对的 你是错的 这都是关于

我的观点

我的看法被提升到了真理

甚至不容忍甚至如此之

远以至于我们无法想象

其他的东西可以被

认为是其他想法是

不可想象的 我们也在社交媒体上看到了这一点

,像推特这样的定位思维和

讨论

正在变得疯狂,

这在

很大程度上是

在美国最盛大的时代出现的,但甚至在

此之前,即使在比利时,我们也

有数十年和数十年的时间。 有

佛兰芒语和法语国家之间讨论的经验,

彼此不理解,并且

随着我们作为一个社会的所有挑战而变得更糟

气候能源和最近觊觎 19

如何处理电晕

讨论 每个人都从

自己的立场开始,没有

互相倾听,

我们也在大学看到它在学术界和你的学术界有

许多两极分化

和辩论

你知道你想要你

想举个例子有很多

例子我不想举个例子

因为当我举个

例子两极分化就会开始我在这里

坐着

独白我们需要对话 为了

克服这种两极分化,我们被困

在一个分裂的世界中,我们

需要走出去,而走出去的解决方案

正是

尝试进行真正的对话,

并做到这一点,你需要学习并

一门新的语言 一种三重 e 语言

情感和同理心的世界语 ii 曾经

写过我们应该从幼儿园开始

我们不知道我们从未学过这种

语言,所以

我认为没有比这更好的语言了 王牌比

大学开始

学习和

试验这种新语言的实验

所以大学我

坐在鲁汶大学的办公室里

这是一所成立

于 1425 年的大学,我们大约有六个

世纪,所以在中世纪

大学是

学者和学生

的社区,是学习社区,在早期

,欧洲的第一所大学,如

博洛尼亚和巴黎,大约是 12

世纪,即使

没有建筑物,

大学

也是没有物理空间的,

连接学者和学生的纽带 一个

社区

,我认为 corona 如果 corona 认为

是一回事,

那就是我们可以不需要

建筑物和物理空间,我们

可以

超越建筑物的界限,

并且我们可以

在数字世界中相互联系

这就是我认为我们应该

开始新的真正对话对话的地方 这是什么

因为我说两极分化和

分歧来自于 om 讨论

辩论 输赢 定位思维

对话是完全不同的东西

dia 在希腊语中

通过单词和古希腊语

logos 甚至可能指将关系聚集

在一起,

所以它是一个对话是一种

流是一种意义的流动

在我们之间,

就像通过这种联系

在人与人之间的关系中

通过这种联系,所有

的意见分歧都会

消失并出现新的

意义

对话不是

为了获得我的意见,

因为真相对话更多的是关于

暂停我的意见 倾听

其他意见和观点

,然后用创造力一起找到

新的方式,新的理解,新的

联系,所以有人说

对话就像

内在的非判断意识和正念的外在对应物,

它是你的联系和

交流

通过开放自己而不是固执的质疑来创造奇迹

尊重自己的立场和观点

,你可能会说,你知道这一切

听起来不错,但它非常

抽象,所以让我们更具体一点

,我们如何才能

进行真正的对话,即通过

说一种新

语言,即世界语的三 e 语言

情感和同理心 那么我们怎么

做 那到底是什么意思

不是

同情,

这不是同意我的导师

、教授和朋友努金教授,

他多年前告诉我,我可以

作为哈佛法学院的犹太法学教授

对纳粹党卫军军官表现出同理心,所以这当然

不是同情

或同意 证明你

可以

通过另一个人的眼睛看世界

,你可以

理解他们对事物的看法

,所以当我们试图联系时

我们需要尝试积极倾听

,你可能会说我做得很好

你不是因为

而且我当然可以见证我

经常不这样做,

甚至现在你正在观看 这个

剪辑

你并没有真正在听我说

你在脑子里想了很多

事情你可能指的是

你的经历你

甚至可能在做白日梦或者

你可能会试图找到反对

我所说的话的论据

或者你可能 说那不像我,或者哦,

我知道这一切,

无论你在想什么,你没有在

听我说,

积极倾听是关掉

你内心的声音

,是为了摆脱对世界的这种

带有判断性

偏见的看法,是

关于开放

和 真的和对方在一起你

知道我们都

一直在评判,评判

显然有好处,因为这是在一个

危险的社会中保护自己的捷径,

今天的社会不那么危险了,所以

我们应该少评判,但我们仍然

坚持 判断

因此,当我们看到另一个人时,当

我们与另一个人交往和交谈时,

我们会立即开始根据

自己的看法和偏见来判断

每个读过迦南和土耳其语的人都知道我们

的偏见

和狭隘的视野,所以我们应该

尝试积极 倾听 摆脱

这些

判断 对方是一千个切面的钻石,

如果我们只看到三个切面,我们怎么能判断那个人

,然后你可以问但是好吧,我该怎么做

我试着闭上我内心的声音我

试过 与另一方在一起,我

试图真正

倾听并展示我的同理心,

我们通过使用同理心循环来做到这一点

ipa 不仅是一种啤酒,它也是

一项非常有趣的技能,尝试

用开放性问题来倾听某人的询问,解释

你所听到的 用你自己的话

检查一下,如果你没有做对,我可以适应、

微调和纠正你

,然后承认你

看到、听到和感觉到的感受

,如果你这样做会发生什么

真正的方式是其他

人会感到被理解,

他们会变得更加

积极,

他会分享信息、观点和

看法

,在某个时候他们会敞开心扉,

然后你就可以

在这个意义上发表你的观点 主动

倾听

是一种通常与其他人联系的工具

,我

经常使用冰冻土地的比喻来

更好地解释这一点,

想象你看到一个农民拿着一大袋种子站在

冰冻的土地

上,他

把所有的种子都扔

在那片土地上 你可能会说,嗯,

这是个傻子,为什么然后

傻子告诉你

不不不,我在撒种子,

鲜花和蔬菜会长出来,你

认为这很愚蠢,地面结冰了,

你知道这正是你

和我

当我们试图

用我们的论点说服某人时,我们就像愚蠢的

农民在冰冻的土地上撒种子一样,

所以积极的倾听和同理心就是

在这片土地上工作 p

解冻

施肥 让对方

感到被认可

然后你可以把你的论点带入

你的种子

看看你是否可以通过对话到达某个地方

嗯这也是关于

积极倾听中的情绪 我喜欢你

知道我们是

95 情绪,我们是非常

情绪化的人,我喜欢

道格拉斯·努尔的说法,他说让我们

互相倾听,这

意味着

我明白了,你很沮丧,你很

失望,你很生气,

你很受伤,

你知道你很生气。

当我能以一种真正的方式做到这一点

时,你会

感到很沮丧 在对话

中会出现新事物

,就像当我们开始对话时

,我有一杯水,而你有

一杯水

,这样做我们最终会得到

一杯新

的液体 ds 那里有我的

一些水和一些你的水,但是出现了一些

全新的东西

,然后

你知道大学应该激发

这种对话,

让我们学会说真正

理解和同情的语言

,相互倾听,

大学可以激发这种对话

通过创建安全空间 安全空间 这是

一个微妙的话题

它有很多含义 有一个安全

空间

,历史上

受歧视的人可以

安全地在一起,

没有判断力

,他们可以互相支持 我

认为大学应该创造

在这样的环境中,您可以

感受到同理心

并努力

获得应得的情感安全,并

如此多的情况下

所造成的创伤和伤害应得的支持,然后大学也应该

创造一个安全的空间 真正真正的

对话

可以出现 这是一个安全的空间,

意见分歧

在此流动, 漂浮在

有不同信仰

的地方,有安全的

地方,可以保护你,嗯,

要能够参与言论自由的

安全,

你知道你会被容忍

,你的观点和意见会受到尊重和同情

,所以它在 同时这是一个

不安全的空间,因为您可以

进行不安全的对话,您可以

谈论

非常微妙和激烈的事情,并且

您确信

您可以畅所欲言,

并且会尊重您的观点

和 宽容

,如果你们有这种

相互同情的对话,那么

呃,将会发生这种

联系,呃,这种对话,这种

思考的真正关系

将会出现,并且

在言论自由中会有联系,所以对我来说,对言论自由的保护

是 与其说是

在启蒙运动中捍卫

你侮辱我的权利

你冒犯我的权利我想

我们已经把它提升到了一个新的

水平 言论自由是关于

我可以说我的观点是我的

观点,因为

我在一个安全的地方,你

会给我同理心,我会给

你同理心,我们会尊重地

倾听彼此交谈

我们将相互对话,新的意义将会

浮现,所以

我希望并呼吁全球所有的学者

和大学的学生

,我们一起

参与讲这种新的三 e 语言

,我们的情感和同理心的世界语 停止

讨论 我们停止辩论 我们

停止

立场争论 我们

停止不容忍 我们开始

真正地联系和倾听

彼此的同理心

这就是大学

在研究中

创造新的理解

在与人的关系中创造新

的理解 是我们作为学者可以

为社会做出的贡献

一个迫切需要

指导以

摆脱两极分化的社会 n 那是在轻声

杀死我们所有人,

所以让我们一起说吧,tripoli,谢谢