How Colonialism Capitalism Taught Us We Can Only Do One Thing

[Music]

who are you

is your automatic response to that what

you do for work

and why is that our inclination

to assert that we bring value is to make

a bid for belonging

belonging is by no exaggeration a

necessity of survival

and we show we belong by how we can

contribute to our communities

we’ve always needed each other

to raise children to protect one another

dividing labor is one reason

anthropologists believe we survived

while our neanderthal cousins didn’t

while both male and female neanderthals

participated in dangerous big game

hunting

leaving fewer women to rare children

our predecessors delegated women to the

safer task of gathering

leaving more women to rare children

and as our tribes grew into larger

societies we carved out more niche roles

like religious leaders and handicraft

workers

but at one point

the intensification of specialized labor

increased drastically

the onset of colonialism and capitalism

marked the beginning of hyper

specialization

as european forces swept through africa

asia the americas and the caribbean they

reorganized the global economy

suddenly artisans and farmers with

diverse skill sets were cornered into

producing limited raw goods for export

for example

under control of the british east india

company

indian finished goods like cotton

muslins were taxed up to 70 percent by

britain

while raw goods like raw cotton weren’t

taxed at all this made it all but

impossible for the indian craft industry

to survive

and while this colonial division of

labor stifled the economic culture of

the colonized it simultaneously grew

european capitalist civilization

and with the growth of capitalism came

the worship of productivity above all

else

it was far more productive for a man to

lace a shoe at the end of an assembly

line

than to make a shoe from start to finish

it didn’t matter if it wasn’t as

interesting or fulfilling

it made profit

and as karl marx said it encouraged the

development of man of one single faculty

at the expense of all other faculties

this is how it begins

this is how colonialism and capitalism

taught us we can only be one thing

because it taught us we are most useful

if we are one thing

but is that true

and does being productive equate to

being useful

there is a famous story john lennon told

about his early education in which a

teacher asked what he wanted to be when

he grew up

he said happy

she said he didn’t understand the

question

we ask kids this all the time we let

them take art class and baseball and

make science experiments and then we say

choose

choose the one thing you’re going to be

but we don’t stop and wonder if they

need to choose

now i chose very early on as far back as

i can remember i was singing and putting

on concerts for my whole family

i was fortunate to go to a public arts

high school where i studied music half

of my day and continued to the berkeley

college of music where i got my

bachelor’s of music

all the while i took private lessons and

sang in up to four choirs at a time

i believed that tunnel vision was the

key to success

until one afternoon a few years ago a

mentor of mine asked if i made any

visual art

to which i promptly replied no

i can’t i’m not good at it

it’s curious looking back as to why i

said that because i’d never actually

tried

she pushed further so

for the first time since grade school

art class i tried to draw

and i liked it

it was meditative it helped me process

the world in a different way than music

does

so i nervously enrolled in community

college drawing class

and something interesting started

happening to my brain

the way i saw the physical world began

to shift

i started seeing faces as shapes and

shadows

i started seeing colors on a continuum

my whole perspective changed

and contrary to my belief that spending

time on art would detract from my music

it actually made it better

more insightful

i thought creativity was a finite well

when in fact it is this thing capable of

regenerating itself

and seeing the through line between my

art and music helped me understand my

purpose

outside of either of them

once i realized i could do this one

thing i wondered what else can i do

maybe i can direct

maybe i could edit that music video

maybe

i can write that essay

and once that mental dam was broken

there was no stopping the flood

so i enrolled in more classes for the

sheer pleasure of learning i took

anthropology and philosophy

i wrote and published those essays

i directed and edited that video and i

showed my art in galleries across the

country

now dedicating your time to multiple

disciplines is not a new idea but i

think we often attribute it to something

of long ago and far away

sure

da vinci could be a scientist and an

engineer and paint the mona lisa

but you couldn’t

and michelangelo could be an architect

and chisel out the david but you

couldn’t

or can you

do you know for sure

have you tried

being immersed in the entertainment

industry i am constantly surrounded by

people carrying on this

multi-disciplinary legacy often out of

necessity

bassists who manage coffee shops

casting directors who are also rock

stars

but i’d like for us to challenge this

idea of singular paths even among more

conventional occupations

why can’t you be an accountant in the

morning and a yoga teacher in the

afternoon

now some would say we would lose

productivity

but the innovators solving the world’s

most difficult problems

are those able to connect seemingly

unconnected fields

while a specialist narrow view can stop

them from seeing solutions in their

periphery

but even if it were true

that stepping away from specialization

would decrease productivity

i believe presumed specialization leads

to something worse

the loss of connection

specialization can disconnect us from

each other

and from ourselves

say there’s part of you that wants to

take up photography

but you ignore it

this part of yourself exists whether or

not it is acknowledged

what would you learn about yourself if

you did explore it

and do you actually know yourself if you

don’t

i believe there are also social justice

implications to this cultural emphasis

on specialization

structural racism has made it so certain

career paths and the education involved

in them are inherently discriminatory

so often specialization

is synonymous with segregation

do we want non-profits with diverse

field workers being directed by

disproportionately white leadership

do we want doctors who spend decades

specializing in their fields only to

ignore the concerns of their black

patients because of the implicit bias

reinforced in medical education

do we want politicians spending all

their time at capitol hill with

corporate lobbyists instead of in the

towns and cities they’re meant to

represent

we can better serve our communities if

we are exposed to more perspectives

and understand the difficulties that

come with different lifestyles and labor

now i’m not saying specialization is

inherently bad

i would say sometimes it is necessary

but this idea that it is inherently good

and that it is a necessary path for all

of us

that is false

my music art essays

they all contribute to my greater

purpose of helping create a more

socially just world

my hope is if we stop focusing so

intently on what we do

we’ll think more about why we do

anything in the first place

and this why

will lead us back to ourselves

and back to one another

thank you

[Applause]

you

[音乐]

是谁是你对

你为工作所做的事情的自动反应

,为什么我们

倾向于断言我们带来价值是为了获得

归属感,毫不夸张地说,这

是生存的必要性

,我们表明我们属于 通过我们如何

为我们的社区做出贡献,

我们一直需要

彼此抚养孩子以保护彼此

分工是

人类学家认为我们幸存下来的原因之一,

而我们的尼安德特人表亲却没有,

而男性和女性尼安德特人都

参与了危险的大型

狩猎活动

将更少的女性留给稀有的孩子

我们的前辈将女性委派给

更安全的任务,

将更多的女性留给

稀有的孩子 劳动力

急剧增加

殖民主义和资本主义的出现

标志着超专业化的开始

随着欧洲势力席卷非洲、

亚洲、美洲和加勒比地区,他们

重组了全球经济,

突然间,拥有

不同技能的工匠和农民被迫

生产有限的出口原材料

,例如

在英国东印度公司的控制下

印度成品,如棉花

英国对平纹细布征税高达 70%,

而对原棉等原材料

根本不征税,这

使得印度手工业几乎

无法生存

,而这种殖民分工同时

扼杀了殖民者的经济文化

欧洲资本主义

文明的发展,随着资本主义的发展,

对生产力的崇拜高于

一切 不管它是否

有趣或不令人满意,

它都会获利

,正如卡尔马克思所说,它鼓励了

开发

以牺牲所有其他学院为代价的单一学院的人

这就是它的开始方式

这就是殖民主义和资本主义如何

教导我们我们只能是一回事,

因为它告诉我们,

如果我们是一回事,我们最有用,

但这是真的

有生产力就

等于有用

吗有一个著名的故事约翰·列侬

讲述了他的早期教育,其中一位

老师问他长大后想成为什么

他说很高兴

她说他不明白

我们问孩子的问题 我们一直让

他们上艺术课和棒球,

做科学实验,然后我们说

选择你要成为的一件事,

但我们不会停下来想知道他们现在是否

需要选择,

我很早就选择了 早在

我的记忆中,我就

在为全家唱歌和举办音乐会

我很幸运地去了一所公共艺术

高中,在那里我学习了

半天的音乐,然后继续在

伯克利音乐学院获得

学士学位 音乐

我一直在参加私人课程,

一次最多在四个合唱团中唱歌

我相信狭隘的视野是

成功的关键

直到几年前的一个下午

,我的一位导师问我是否制作了任何

视觉

艺术,我很快就做到了 回答不,

我不能,我不擅长,

回想起来我为什么这么说很奇怪

,因为我从来没有真正

尝试过

她推得更远,

所以自从小学

艺术课以来我第一次尝试画画

,我喜欢

它是冥想的 它帮助我

以不同于音乐的方式处理世界

所以我紧张地参加了社区

大学的绘画课

有趣的事情开始

发生在我的大脑

中 我看到物理世界的方式开始

发生变化

我开始将面孔视为形状 和

阴影

我开始看到连续统一的颜色

我的整个视角都发生了变化

,这与我认为花

时间在艺术上会减损我的音乐的信念相反,

它实际上使它变得更好

更有洞察力

我认为创造力 w 作为一口有限的井

,而事实上它能够

自我再生

并看到我的艺术和音乐之间的贯穿线

帮助我理解了我

在他们中的任何一个之外的目的

一旦我意识到我可以做这

件事我想知道我还能做什么

也许我可以指导

也许我可以编辑那个音乐视频

也许

我可以写那篇

文章一旦精神大坝被打破

,洪水就无法阻止,

所以我参加了更多的课程,

纯粹是为了学习我学习

人类学和哲学

我写的 并发表了

我导演和编辑的那些文章,

我在全国各地的画廊里展示了我的艺术

现在把你的时间花在多个

学科上并不是一个新想法,但我

认为我们经常把它归因于

很久以前和遥远的

达芬奇 可以成为科学家和

工程师,画

蒙娜丽莎,但你不能,米开朗基罗可以成为建筑师

,凿出大卫,但你

不能,

或者你

知道吗? w

当然,您是否尝试过

沉浸在娱乐业中

即使在更

传统的职业中,这种单一路径的想法

为什么你现在不能在早上成为一名会计师

,下午成为一名瑜伽老师,

有些人会说我们会失去

生产力,

但解决世界上最困难问题的创新者

是那些能够连接的人

看似不相关的领域,

而专家狭隘的观点可能会阻止

他们在外围看到解决方案,

但即使

离开专业化确实

会降低生产力,

我相信假定的专业化会

导致更糟糕的情况

,失去联系

专业化会使我们彼此分离

并且从我们自己

说你的一部分想要

ta 坚持摄影,

但你忽略它

,你自己的这部分存在,

不管它是否被承认

,如果

你探索它

,你会对自己了解什么,如果你不了解你自己,

我相信这也有社会正义的

含义

对专业化的文化强调

结构性种族主义使得某些

职业道路和其中所涉及的教育

本质上是歧视性的,

所以专业化通常

是种族隔离的同义词,

我们是否希望非营利组织拥有多样化的

现场工作人员,由

不成比例的白人领导层

领导 花几十年的时间

专注于他们的领域,却因为医学教育中强化的隐性偏见而

忽视了黑人患者的担忧,

我们是否希望政客们把所有

的时间都花在国会山上与

企业游说者在一起,而不是在

他们打算去的城镇

表示

如果我们接触到更多,我们可以更好地为我们的社区服务

观点

理解不同生活方式和劳动带来的困难

现在我并不是说专业化

本质上是坏

的 错误

我的音乐艺术论文

它们都有助于我的更大

目标,即帮助创造一个更加

社会公正的世界

将带领我们回到自己

,回到彼此,

谢谢

[掌声]