4 ways to build a human company in the age of machines Tim Leberecht

Half of the human workforce
is expected to be replaced

by software and robots
in the next 20 years.

And many corporate leaders welcome
that as a chance to increase profits.

Machines are more efficient;

humans are complicated
and difficult to manage.

Well, I want our organizations
to remain human.

In fact, I want them to become beautiful.

Because as machines take our jobs
and do them more efficiently,

soon the only work left for us humans
will be the kind of work

that must be done beautifully
rather than efficiently.

To maintain our humanity
in the this second Machine Age,

we may have no other choice
than to create beauty.

Beauty is an elusive concept.

For the writer Stendhal
it was the promise of happiness.

For me it’s a goal by Lionel Messi.

(Laughter)

So bear with me

as I am proposing four admittedly
very subjective principles

that you can use to build
a beautiful organization.

First: do the unnecessary.

[Do the Unnecessary]

A few months ago, Hamdi Ulukaya,

the CEO and founder
of the yogurt company Chobani,

made headlines when he decided to grant
stock to all of his 2,000 employees.

Some called it a PR stunt,

others – a genuine act of giving back.

But there is something else
that was remarkable about it.

It came completely out of the blue.

There had been no market
or stakeholder pressure,

and employees were so surprised

that they burst into tears
when they heard the news.

Actions like Ulukaya’s are beautiful
because they catch us off guard.

They create something out of nothing

because they’re completely unnecessary.

I once worked at a company

that was the result of a merger

of a large IT outsourcing firm
and a small design firm.

We were merging 9,000 software engineers

with 1,000 creative types.

And to unify these
immensely different cultures,

we were going to launch
a third, new brand.

And the new brand color
was going to be orange.

And as we were going
through the budget for the rollouts,

we decided last minute

to cut the purchase
of 10,000 orange balloons,

which we had meant
to distribute to all staff worldwide.

They just seemed
unnecessary and cute in the end.

I didn’t know back then

that our decision
marked the beginning of the end –

that these two organizations
would never become one.

And sure enough,
the merger eventually failed.

Now, was it because
there weren’t any orange balloons?

No, of course not.

But the kill-the-orange-balloons
mentality permeated everything else.

You might not always realize it,
but when you cut the unnecessary,

you cut everything.

Leading with beauty means
rising above what is merely necessary.

So do not kill your orange balloons.

The second principle:

create intimacy.

[Create Intimacy]

Studies show that
how we feel about our workplace

very much depends on the relationships
with our coworkers.

And what are relationships
other than a string of microinteractions?

There are hundreds of these
every day in our organizations

that have the potential to distinguish
a good life from a beautiful one.

The marriage researcher John Gottman says

that the secret of a healthy relationship

is not the great gesture
or the lofty promise,

it’s small moments of attachment.

In other words, intimacy.

In our networked organizations,

we tout the strength of weak ties

but we underestimate
the strength of strong ones.

We forget the words of the writer
Richard Bach who once said,

“Intimacy –

not connectedness –

intimacy is the opposite of loneliness.”

So how do we design
for organizational intimacy?

The humanitarian organization CARE

wanted to launch
a campaign on gender equality

in villages in northern India.

But it realized quickly

that it had to have this conversation
first with its own staff.

So it invited all 36 team members
and their partners

to one of the Khajuraho Temples,

known for their famous erotic sculptures.

And there they openly discussed
their personal relationships –

their own experiences of gender equality

with the coworkers and the partners.

It was eye-opening for the participants.

Not only did it allow them
to relate to the communities they serve,

it also broke down invisible barriers

and created a lasting bond
amongst themselves.

Not a single team member
quit in the next four years.

So this is how you create intimacy.

No masks …

or lots of masks.

(Laughter)

When Danone, the food company,

wanted to translate its new company
manifesto into product initiatives,

it gathered the management team

and 100 employees
from across different departments,

seniority levels and regions

for a three-day strategy retreat.

And it asked everybody
to wear costumes for the entire meeting:

wigs, crazy hats, feather boas,

huge glasses and so on.

And they left with concrete outcomes

and full of enthusiasm.

And when I asked the woman
who had designed this experience

why it worked,

she simply said, “Never underestimate
the power of a ridiculous wig.”

(Laughter)

(Applause)

Because wigs erase hierarchy,

and hierarchy kills intimacy –

both ways,

for the CEO and the intern.

Wigs allow us to use
the disguise of the false

to show something true about ourselves.

And that’s not easy
in our everyday work lives,

because the relationship
with our organizations

is often like that of a married couple
that has grown apart,

suffered betrayals and disappointments,

and is now desperate to be beautiful
for one another once again.

And for either of us the first step
towards beauty involves a huge risk.

The risk to be ugly.

[Be Ugly]

So many organizations these days
are keen on designing beautiful workplaces

that look like anything but work:

vacation resorts, coffee shops,
playgrounds or college campuses –

(Laughter)

Based on the promises
of positive psychology,

we speak of play and gamification,

and one start-up even says
that when someone gets fired,

they have graduated.

(Laughter)

That kind of beautiful language
only goes “skin deep,

but ugly cuts clean to the bone,”

as the writer Dorothy Parker once put it.

To be authentic is to be ugly.

It doesn’t mean that you can’t have fun
or must give in to the vulgar or cynical,

but it does mean that you speak
the actual ugly truth.

Like this manufacturer

that wanted to transform
one of its struggling business units.

It identified, named and pinned
on large boards all the issues –

and there were hundreds of them –

that had become obstacles
to better performance.

They put them on boards,
moved them all into one room,

which they called “the ugly room.”

The ugly became visible
for everyone to see –

it was celebrated.

And the ugly room served as a mix
of mirror exhibition and operating room –

a biopsy on the living flesh
to cut out all the bureaucracy.

The ugliest part of our body is our brain.

Literally and neurologically.

Our brain renders ugly
what is unfamiliar …

modern art, atonal music,

jazz, maybe –

VR goggles for that matter –

strange objects, sounds and people.

But we’ve all been ugly once.

We were a weird-looking baby,

a new kid on the block, a foreigner.

And we will be ugly again
when we don’t belong.

The Center for Political Beauty,

an activist collective in Berlin,

recently staged an extreme
artistic intervention.

With the permission of relatives,

it exhumed the corpses of refugees
who had drowned at Europe’s borders,

transported them all the way to Berlin,

and then reburied them
at the heart of the German capital.

The idea was to allow them
to reach their desired destination,

if only after their death.

Such acts of beautification
may not be pretty,

but they are much needed.

Because things tend to get ugly
when there’s only one meaning, one truth,

only answers and no questions.

Beautiful organizations
keep asking questions.

They remain incomplete,

which is the fourth
and the last of the principles.

[Remain Incomplete]

Recently I was in Paris,

and a friend of mine
took me to Nuit Debout,

which stands for “up all night,”

the self-organized protest movement

that had formed in response
to the proposed labor laws in France.

Every night, hundreds gathered
at the Place de la République.

Every night they set up
a small, temporary village

to deliberate their own vision
of the French Republic.

And at the core of this adhocracy

was a general assembly
where anybody could speak

using a specially designed sign language.

Like Occupy Wall Street
and other protest movements,

Nuit Debout was born
in the face of crisis.

It was messy –

full of controversies and contradictions.

But whether you agreed
with the movement’s goals or not,

every gathering was
a beautiful lesson in raw humanity.

And how fitting that Paris –

the city of ideals, the city of beauty –

was it’s stage.

It reminds us that like great cities,

the most beautiful organizations
are ideas worth fighting for –

even and especially
when their outcome is uncertain.

They are movements;

they are always imperfect,
never fully organized,

so they avoid ever becoming banal.

They have something
but we don’t know what it is.

They remain mysterious;
we can’t take our eyes off them.

We find them beautiful.

So to do the unnecessary,

to create intimacy,

to be ugly,

to remain incomplete –

these are not only the qualities
of beautiful organizations,

these are inherently
human characteristics.

And these are also the qualities
of what we call home.

And as we disrupt, and are disrupted,

the least we can do is to ensure

that we still feel at home
in our organizations,

and that we use our organizations
to create that feeling for others.

Beauty can save the world
when we embrace these principles

and design for them.

In the face of artificial intelligence
and machine learning,

we need a new radical humanism.

We must acquire and promote
a new aesthetic and sentimental education.

Because if we don’t,

we might end up feeling like aliens

in organizations and societies
that are full of smart machines

that have no appreciation whatsoever

for the unnecessary,

the intimate,

the incomplete

and definitely not for the ugly.

Thank you.

(Applause)

预计未来 20 年,一半的
人力将

被软件和
机器人取代。

许多企业领导人都欢迎
这是一个增加利润的机会。

机器效率更高;

人类很复杂
,很难管理。

好吧,我希望我们的
组织保持人性化。

事实上,我希望他们变得美丽。

因为随着机器接管我们的工作
并更有效地完成它们,

很快我们人类剩下
的唯一工作将是

那些必须精美
而不是高效地完成的工作。

为了
在第二个机器时代保持我们的人性,

我们可能
别无选择,只能创造美。

美是一个难以捉摸的概念。

对于作家司汤达
来说,这是幸福的承诺。

对我来说,这是莱昂内尔·梅西的进球。

(笑声)

所以请耐心等待,

因为我提出了四个公认的
非常主观的原则

,你可以用它们来建立
一个漂亮的组织。

第一:做不必要的事。

[做不必要的事]

几个月前,酸奶公司 Chobani

的首席执行官兼创始人 Hamdi Ulukaya

决定
向其所有 2,000 名员工授予股票时成为头条新闻。

一些人称其为公关噱头,另一些人称其

为真正的回馈行为。

但还有
一些值得注意的地方。

它完全出乎意料。

没有市场
或利益相关者的压力

,员工们听到这个消息感到非常惊讶

,泪流满面

像 Ulukaya 这样的行为很美,
因为它们让我们措手不及。

他们无中生有,

因为他们完全没有必要。

我曾经在

一家大型 IT 外包公司
和小型设计公司合并的公司工作。

我们将 9,000 名软件工程师

与 1,000 种创意类型合并在一起。

为了统一这些
截然不同的文化,

我们将
推出第三个新品牌。

新的品牌
颜色将是橙色。

在我们
审核推出的预算时,

我们在最后一刻

决定减少
购买 10,000 个橙色气球

,我们打算
将这些气球分发给全球所有员工。

他们最终似乎是
不必要的和可爱的。

那时我不

知道我们的决定
标志着终结的开始——

这两个组织
永远不会合二为一。

果然
,合并最终失败了。

现在,是因为
没有橙色气球吗?

不,当然不。

但是杀死橙色气球的
心态渗透到其他一切。

你可能并不总是意识到这一点,
但是当你削减不必要的,

你削减了一切。

以美为先意味着
超越仅仅是必要的。

所以不要杀死你的橙色气球。

第二个原则:

创造亲密感。

[建立亲密关系]

研究表明,
我们对工作场所的感觉在

很大程度上取决于
与同事的关系。

除了一系列微交互之外,还有什么关系?

在我们的组织

中,每天都有数百个这样的人有可能
将美好生活与美好生活区分开来。

婚姻研究员约翰·戈特曼说

,健康关系的秘诀

不是伟大的姿态
或崇高的承诺,

而是依恋的微小时刻。

换句话说,亲密关系。

在我们的网络组织中,

我们吹捧弱关系的力量,

但我们低估
了强关系的力量。

我们忘记了作家
理查德·巴赫(Richard Bach)曾经说过的话:

“亲密——

不是联系——

亲密是孤独的反面。”

那么我们如何
设计组织亲密关系呢?

人道主义组织 CARE

希望

在印度北部的村庄发起一场性别平等运动。

但它很快

意识到,它必须
首先与自己的员工进行对话。

因此,它邀请了所有 36 名团队成员
及其合作伙伴

前往以

著名的色情雕塑而闻名的克久拉霍神庙之一。

在那里,他们公开讨论了
他们的个人关系——

他们自己

与同事和合作伙伴的性别平等经历。

这让参与者大开眼界。

它不仅使他们
能够与所服务的社区建立联系,

还打破了无形的障碍,

并在他们之间建立了持久的联系

在接下来的四年里,没有一个团队成员退出。

所以这就是你创造亲密关系的方式。

没有口罩……

或者很多口罩。

(笑声)

当食品公司达能

想将其新的公司
宣言转化为产品计划时,

它召集了来自不同部门、资历和地区的管理团队

和 100 名员工

进行了为期三天的战略撤退。

它要求每个人
在整个会议期间都穿着服装:

假发、疯狂的帽子、羽毛围巾、

巨大的眼镜等等。

他们带着具体的成果

和充满热情的离开。

当我问
设计这种体验的女士

为什么它会起作用时,

她简单地说,“永远不要低估
可笑假发的力量。”

(笑声)

(掌声)

因为假发消除了等级制度

,等级制度扼杀了亲密关系——

无论

是对 CEO 还是实习生来说。

假发使我们能够使用
虚假的伪装

来展示我们自己的真实情况。


在我们的日常工作生活中并不容易,

因为
与我们组织

的关系往往就像一对已经分居的已婚夫妇

遭受背叛和失望

,现在迫切希望
再次为彼此美丽。

对于我们任何一个人来说,
迈向美丽的第一步都涉及巨大的风险。

变丑的风险。

[Be Ugly]

现在很多组织
都热衷于设计漂亮的工作场所

,看起来不像工作:

度假胜地、咖啡店、
游乐场或大学校园——

(笑声)

基于
积极心理学的承诺,

我们谈到游戏和 游戏化

,一家初创公司甚至说
,当有人被解雇时,

他们就毕业了。

(笑声) 正如作家多萝西·帕克(Dorothy Parker)曾经说过的

那样,这种美丽的语言
只会“肤浅,

但丑陋的切入骨子里”

真实就是丑陋。

这并不意味着你不能玩得开心
或必须屈服于粗俗或愤世嫉俗的人,

但这确实意味着你说出
了真实的丑陋真相。

就像这家

想要
改造其陷入困境的业务部门之一的制造商一样。

它识别、命名并
在大板上钉住了所有问题

  • 有数百个 -

这些问题已成为
提高绩效的障碍。

他们把它们放在板上,
把它们全部搬到一个房间里

,他们称之为“丑陋的房间”。

每个人都可以看到丑陋的东西
——

它被庆祝了。

丑陋的房间
兼具镜子展览和手术室的作用——

对活体进行活检
以消除所有官僚主义。

我们身体最丑陋的部分是我们的大脑。

从字面上和神经学上讲。

我们的大脑把
不熟悉的东西渲染得很丑……

现代艺术、无调性音乐、

爵士乐,

也许——VR护目镜——

奇怪的物体、声音和人。

但我们都丑过一次。

我们是一个长相怪异的婴儿,

一个新来的孩子,一个外国人。

当我们不属于自己时,我们会再次变得丑陋

柏林的一个激进集体政治美中心

最近进行了一场极端的
艺术干预。

在亲属的允许下,


把在欧洲边境淹死的难民尸体挖出

来,一路运到柏林,

然后
在德国首都的中心地带重新安葬。

这个想法是让他们
能够到达他们想要的目的地,

即使只是在他们死后。

这样的美化行为
可能并不漂亮,

但它们是非常需要的。

因为
当只有一种意义、一种真理、

只有答案而没有问题时,事情往往会变得丑陋。

美丽的组织
不断提出问题。

它们仍然不完整,

这是第四个
也是最后一个原则。

[未完成]

最近我在巴黎,我

的一个朋友
带我去了 Nuit Debout,

它代表“彻夜未眠”

这是
针对法国拟议的劳动法而形成的自组织抗议运动。

每天晚上,数百人聚集
在共和广场。

每天晚上,他们都会建立
一个临时的小村庄,

以思考他们自己
对法兰西共和国的看法。

这种临时性的核心

是一个大会
,任何人都可以

使用专门设计的手语发言。

与占领华尔街
和其他抗议运动一样,

Nuit Debout 诞生
于危机面前。

它很混乱——

充满了争议和矛盾。

但无论你
是否同意该运动的目标,

每次聚会都是
关于原始人性的美好课程。

巴黎——

理想之城,美丽之城——

是多么适合它的舞台。

它提醒我们,就像伟大的城市一样

,最美丽的组织
是值得为之奋斗的想法——

即使,尤其是
当它们的结果不确定时。

它们是运动;

它们总是不完美的,
从不完全有条理,

因此它们避免变得平庸。

他们有一些东西,
但我们不知道它是什么。

它们仍然是神秘的;
我们不能把目光从他们身上移开。

我们发现它们很漂亮。

因此,做不必要的事

、创造亲密关系

、变得丑陋

、保持不完整——

这些不仅
是美丽组织的品质,

也是人类固有的
特征。

这些
也是我们称之为家的品质。

当我们扰乱并被扰乱时

,我们至少能做的是

确保我们在组织中仍然有宾至如归的感觉

并确保我们利用我们的组织
为他人创造这种感觉。

当我们接受这些原则

并为它们设计时,美丽可以拯救世界。

面对人工智能
和机器学习,

我们需要一种全新的激进人文主义。

我们必须获得和促进
一种新的审美和情感教育。

因为如果我们不这样做,

我们最终可能会


充满智能机器的组织和社会中感觉像外星人,这些机器

对不必要的

、亲密的

、不完整的

,绝对不会欣赏丑陋的东西。

谢谢你。

(掌声)