Why city flags may be the worstdesigned thing youve never noticed Roman Mars

I know what you’re thinking:

“Why does that guy get to sit down?”

That’s because this is radio.

(Music)

I tell radio stories about design,

and I report on all kinds of stories:

buildings and toothbrushes,
mascots and wayfinding and fonts.

My mission is to get people to engage
with the design that they care about

so they begin to pay attention
to all forms of design.

When you decode the world
with design intent in mind,

the world becomes kind of magical.

Instead of seeing the broken things,

you see all the little bits of genius

that anonymous designers have sweated over
to make our lives better.

And that’s essentially
the definition of design:

making life better and providing joy.

And few things give me greater joy

than a well-designed flag.

(Laughter)

Yeah!

(Applause)

Happy 50th anniversary
on your flag, Canada.

It is beautiful, gold standard.

Love it.

I’m kind of obsessed with flags.

Sometimes I bring up the topic of flags,

and people are like,
“I don’t care about flags,”

and then we start talking
about flags, and trust me,

100 percent of people care about flags.

There’s just something about them
that works on our emotions.

My family wrapped my Christmas presents
as flags this year,

including the blue gift bag
that’s dressed up as the flag of Scotland.

I put this picture online,
and sure enough,

within the first few minutes,
someone left a comment that said,

“You can take that Scottish Saltire
and shove it up your ass.”

(Laughter)

See, people are passionate
about flags, you know?

That’s the way it is.

What I love about flags

is that once you understand
the design of flags,

what makes a good flag,
what makes a bad flag,

you can understand
the design of almost anything.

So what I’m going to do here is,

I cracked open an episode
of my radio show,

“99% Invisible,” and I’m going
to reconstruct it here on stage,

so when I press a button over here –

Voice: S for Sound –

Roman Mars: It’s going to make a sound,

and so whenever you hear a sound
or a voice or a piece of music,

it’s because I pressed a button.

Voice: Sound.

RM: All right, got it? Here we go.

Three, two.

This is 99% Invisible. I’m Roman Mars.

(Music)

Narrator: The five basic
principles of flag design.

Roman Mars: According to the North
American Vexillological Association.

Vexillological.

Ted Kaye: Vexillology
is the study of flags.

RM: It’s that extra “lol”
that makes it sound weird.

Narrator: Number one, keep it simple.

The flag should be so simple
that a child can draw it from memory.

RM: Before I moved to Chicago in 2005,

I didn’t even know cities
had their own flags.

TK: Most larger cities do have flags.

RM: Well, I didn’t know that,
that’s Ted Kaye, by the way.

TK: Hello.

RM: He’s a flag expert,
he’s a totally awesome guy.

TK: I’m Ted Kaye, I have edited
a scholarly journal on flag studies,

and I am currently involved
with the Portland Flag Association

and the North American
Vexillological Association.

RM: Ted literally wrote
the book on flag design.

Narrator: “Good Flag, Bad Flag.”

RM: It’s more of a pamphlet, really,
it’s about 16 pages.

TK: Yes, it’s called “Good Flag, Bad Flag:
How to Design a Great Flag.”

RM: And that first city flag
I discovered in Chicago

is a beaut:

white field, two horizontal blue stripes,

and four six-pointed red stars
down the middle.

(Sound)

Narrator: Number two,
use meaningful symbolism.

TK: The blue stripes represent
the water, the river and the lake.

Narrator: The flag’s images,
colors or pattern

should relate to what it symbolizes.

TK: The red stars represent
significant events in Chicago’s history.

RM: Namely, the founding of Fort Dearborn
on the future site of Chicago,

the Great Chicago Fire,

the World Columbian Exposition,
which everyone remembers

because of the White City,

and the Century of Progress Exposition,
which no one remembers at all.

Narrator: Number three,
use two to three basic colors.

TK: The basic rule for colors
is to use two to three colors

from the standard color set:
red, white, blue, green, yellow and black.

RM: The design of the Chicago flag
has complete buy-in

with an entire cross-section of the city.

It is everywhere;

every municipal building flies the flag.

Whet Moser: There’s probably
at least one store on every block

near where I work that sells
some sort of Chicago flag paraphernalia.

RM: That’s Whet Moser
from Chicago magazine.

WM: Today, just for example,
I went to get a haircut,

and when I sat down in the barber’s chair,

there was a Chicago flag on the box
that the barber kept all his tools in,

and then in the mirror, there was
a Chicago flag on the wall behind me.

When I left, a guy passed me who had
a Chicago flag badge on his backpack.

RM: It’s adaptable and remixable.

The six-pointed stars in particular
show up in all kinds of places.

WM: The coffee I bought the other day
had a Chicago star on it.

RM: It’s a distinct symbol
of Chicago pride.

TK: When a police officer
or a firefighter dies in Chicago,

often it’s not the flag
of the United States on his casket.

It can be the flag of the city of Chicago.

That’s how deeply the flag has gotten
into the civic imagery of Chicago.

RM: And it isn’t just that people
love Chicago and therefore love the flag.

I also think that people love Chicago more
because the flag is so cool.

TK: A positive feedback loop there
between great symbolism and civic pride.

RM: OK, so when I moved back
to San Francisco in 2008,

I researched its flag,

because I had never seen it
in the previous eight years I lived there.

And I found it, I am sorry to say,

sadly lacking.

(Laughter)

I know.

It hurts me, too.

(Laughter)

TK: Well, let me start from the top.

Narrator: Number one, keep it simple.

TK: Keeping it simple.

Narrator: The flag should be so simple
that a child can draw it from memory.

TK: It’s a relatively complex flag.

RM: OK, here we go, OK.

The main component
of the San Francisco flag is a phoenix

representing the city
rising from the ashes

after the devastating fires of the 1850s.

TK: A powerful symbol for San Francisco.

RM: I still don’t really dig the phoenix.

Design-wise, it manages
to both be too crude

and have too many details
at the same time,

which if you were trying for that,

you wouldn’t be able to do it,

and it just looks bad at a distance,

but having deep meaning
puts that element in the plus column.

Behind the phoenix,
the background is mostly white,

and then it has a substantial
gold border around it.

TK: Which is a very attractive
design element.

RM: I think it’s OK, but –

(Laughter)

here come the big no-nos of flag design.

Narrator: Number four,
no lettering or seals.

Never use writing of any kind.

RM: Underneath the phoenix,
there’s a motto on a ribbon

that translates to
“Gold in peace, iron in war,”

plus – and this is the big problem –

it says San Francisco across the bottom.

TK: If you need to write the name
of what you’re representing on your flag,

your symbolism has failed.

(Laughter)

(Applause)

RM: The United States flag
doesn’t say “USA” across the front.

In fact, country flags,
they tend to behave.

Like, hats off to South Africa
and Turkey and Israel

and Somalia and Japan and Gambia.

There’s a bunch
of really great country flags,

but they obey good design principles
because the stakes are high.

They’re on the international stage.

But city, state and regional flags
are another story.

(Laughter)

There is a scourge of bad flags –

(Laughter)

and they must be stopped.

(Laughter)

(Applause)

That is the truth and that is the dare.

The first step is to recognize
that we have a problem.

(Laughter)

A lot of people tend to think
that good design

is just a matter of taste,

and quite honestly,
sometimes it is, actually,

but sometimes it isn’t, all right?

(Laughter)

Here’s the full list of NAVA
flag design principles.

Narrator: The five
basic principles of flag design.

Narrator: Number one.
TK: Keep it simple.

Narrator: Number two.
TK: Use meaningful symbolism.

Narrator: Number three.
TK: Use two to three basic colors.

Narrator: Number four.
TK: No lettering or seals.

Narrator: Never use writing of any kind.

TK: Because you can’t
read that at a distance.

Narrator: Number five.
TK: And be distinctive.

RM: All the best flags tend
to stick to these principles.

And like I said before,
most country flags are OK.

But here’s the thing:

if you showed this list of principles
to any designer of almost anything,

they would say these principles –
simplicity, deep meaning,

having few colors
or being thoughtful about colors,

uniqueness, don’t have
writing you can’t read –

all those principles apply to them, too.

But sadly, good design principles
are rarely invoked in US city flags.

Our biggest problem
seems to be that fourth one.

We just can’t stop ourselves
from putting our names on our flags,

or little municipal seals
with tiny writing on them.

Here’s the thing about municipal seals:

They were designed
to be on pieces of paper

where you can read them,

not on flags 100 feet away
flapping in the breeze.

So here’s a bunch of flags again.

Vexillologists call these SOBs:

Seals on a bedsheet –

(Laughter)

and if you can’t tell
what city they go to,

yeah, that’s exactly the problem,

except for Anaheim,
apparently, they fixed it.

(Laughter)

These flags are everywhere in the US.

The European equivalent
of the municipal seal

is the city coat of arms …

and this is where we can learn
a lesson for how to do things right.

So this is the city
coat of arms of Amsterdam.

Now, if this were a United States city,

the flag would probably look like this.

You know, yeah.

(Laughter)

But instead, the flag of Amsterdam

looks like this.

Rather than plopping
the whole coat of arms

on a solid background and writing
“Amsterdam” below it,

they just take the key elements
of the escutcheon, the shield,

and they turn it into the most
badass city flag in the world.

(Laughter)

(Applause)

And because it’s so badass,

those flags and crosses
are found throughout Amsterdam,

just like Chicago, they’re used.

Even though seal-on-a-bedsheet flags
are particularly painful

and offensive to me,

nothing can quite prepare you

for one of the biggest train wrecks
in vexillological history.

(Laughter)

Are you ready?

It’s the flag of Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

(Laughter)

I mean, it’s distinctive,

I’ll give them that.

Steve Kodis: It was adopted in 1955.

RM: The city ran a contest

and gathered a bunch of submissions
with all kinds of designs.

SK: And an alderman
by the name of Fred Steffan

cobbled together parts of the submissions
to make what is now the Milwaukee flag.

RM: It’s a kitchen sink flag.

There’s a gigantic gear
representing industry,

there’s a ship recognizing the port,

a giant stalk of wheat

paying homage to the brewing industry.

It’s a hot mess,

and Steve Kodis, a graphic designer
from Milwaukee, wants to change it.

SK: It’s really awful.

It’s a misstep on the city’s behalf,

to say the least.

RM: But what puts
the Milwaukee flag over the top,

almost to the point of self-parody,

is on it is a picture of the Civil War
battle flag of the Milwaukee regiment.

SK: So that’s the final element in it

that just makes it
that much more ridiculous,

that there is a flag design
within the Milwaukee flag.

RM: On the flag. Yeah. Yeah.

(Laughter)

Yeah.

(Music)

Now, Milwaukee is a fantastic city.

I’ve been there, I love it.

The most depressing part
of this flag, though,

is that there have been
two major redesign contests.

The last one was held in 2001.

105 entries were received.

TK: But in the end, the members
of the Milwaukee Arts Board

decided that none of the new entries
were worthy of flying over the city.

RM: They couldn’t agree
to change that thing!

(Laughter)

That’s discouraging enough
to make you think

that good design and democracy
just simply do not go together.

(Laughter)

But Steve Kotas is going
to try one more time

to redesign the Milwaukee flag.

SK: I believe Milwaukee is a great city.

Every great city deserves a great flag.

RM: Steve isn’t ready
to reveal his design yet.

One of the things about
proposing one of these things

is you have to get people on board,

and then you reveal your design.

But here’s the trick:

If you want to design a great flag,

a kick-ass flag like Chicago’s or DC’s,
which also has a great flag,

start by drawing
a one-by-one-and-a-half-inch rectangle

on a piece of paper.

Your design has to fit
within that tiny rectangle.

Here’s why.

TK: A three-by-five-foot flag
on a pole 100 feet away

looks about the same size
as a one-by-one-and-a-half-inch rectangle

seen about 15 inches from your eye.

You’d be surprised by how compelling
and simple the design can be

when you hold yourself to that limitation.

RM: Meanwhile, back in San Francisco.

Is there anything we can do?

TK: I like to say that in every bad flag
there’s a good flag trying to get out.

The way to make
San Francisco’s flag a good flag

is to take the motto off
because you can’t read that at a distance.

Take the name off,

and the border might even be made thicker,
so it’s more a part of the flag.

And I would simply take the phoenix

and make it a great big element
in the middle of the flag.

RM: But the current phoenix,
that’s got to go.

TK: I would simplify
or stylize the phoenix.

Depict a big, wide-winged bird

coming out of flames.

Emphasize those flames.

RM: So this San Francisco flag
was designed by Frank Chimero

based on Ted Kaye’s suggestions.

I don’t know what he would do
if we was completely unfettered

and didn’t follow those guidelines.

Fans of my radio show and podcast,
heard me complain about bad flags.

They’ve sent me other suggested designs.

This one’s by Neil Mussett.

Both are so much better.

(Laughter)

And I think if they were adopted,

I would see them around the city.

In my crusade to make
flags of the world more beautiful,

many listeners have taken it
upon themselves

to redesign their flags
and look into the feasibility

of getting them officially adopted.

(Music)

If you see your city flag and like it,

fly it,

even if it violates a design rule or two.

I don’t care.

But if you don’t see your city flag,

maybe it doesn’t exist, but maybe it does,

and it just sucks,

and I dare you to join the effort
to try to change that.

As we move more and more into cities,

the city flag will become
not just a symbol of that city as a place,

but also, it could become a symbol
of how that city considers design itself,

especially today, as the populace
is becoming more design-aware.

And I think design awareness
is at an all-time high.

A well-designed flag could be seen
as an indicator of how a city

considers all of its design systems:

its public transit,

its parks, its signage.

It might seem frivolous, but it’s not.

TK: Often when city leaders say,

“We have more important things to do
than worry about a city flag,”

my response is,

“If you had a great city flag,

you would have a banner
for people to rally under

to face those more important things.”

(Music)

RM: I’ve seen firsthand
what a good city flag can do

in the case of Chicago.

The marriage of good design
and civic pride

is something that we need in all places.

The best part about municipal flags
is that we own them.

They are an open-source,

publicly owned design language
of the community.

When they are done well,

they are remixable, adaptable,
and they are powerful.

We could control the branding
and graphical imagery

of our cities with a good flag,

but instead, by having
bad flags we don’t use,

we cede that territory to sports teams

and chambers of commerce
and tourism boards.

Sports teams can leave
and break our hearts.

And besides, some of us
don’t really care about sports.

And tourism campaigns can just be cheesy.

But a great city flag

is something that represents
a city to its people

and its people to the world at large.

And when that flag is a beautiful thing,

that connection is a beautiful thing.

So maybe all the city flags
can be as inspiring as Hong Kong

or Portland or Trondheim,

and we can do away with all the bad flags

like San Francisco, Milwaukee,
Cedar Rapids,

and finally, when we’re all done,

we can do something
about Pocatello, Idaho,

considered by the North American
Vexillological Association

as the worst city flag in North America.

[Proud to be Pocatello]

(Laughter)

(Applause)

Yeah.

(Applause)

That thing has a trademark
symbol on it, people.

(Laughter)

That hurts me just to look at.

(Laughter)

Thank you so much for listening.

(Applause)

[Music by: Melodium (@melodiumbox)
and Keegan DeWitt (@keegandewitt)]

我知道你在想什么:

“那家伙为什么要坐下?”

那是因为这是收音机。

(音乐)

我讲关于设计的广播故事

,我报道各种各样的故事:

建筑物和牙刷、
吉祥物、寻路和字体。

我的使命是让人们参与
他们关心的设计,

以便他们开始
关注所有形式的设计。

当您
以设计意图解码世界时

,世界变得有点神奇。 你

看到的不是破碎的东西,而是

匿名设计师
为让我们的生活更美好而付出的所有小天才。

这本质
上就是设计的定义:

让生活更美好并提供快乐。

没有什么

比精心设计的旗帜更能给我带来快乐了。

(笑声)

是的!

(掌声)

加拿大国旗上的 50 周年快乐。

这是美丽的,黄金标准。

爱它。

我有点痴迷于旗帜。

有时我提出旗帜的话题

,人们会说,
“我不关心旗帜”

,然后我们开始
谈论旗帜,相信我,

100% 的人关心旗帜。

他们只是有一些
东西可以影响我们的情绪。 今年

我的家人将我的圣诞礼物包装
成旗帜,

包括装扮成苏格兰国旗的蓝色礼品袋。

我把这张照片放到网上
,果然,

在最初的几分钟内,
有人发表评论说:

“你可以把苏格兰萨尔蒂
拿起来,把它塞到你的屁股上。”

(笑声)

看,人们
对旗帜充满热情,你知道吗?

它就是这样儿的。

我喜欢旗帜的

一点是,一旦你了解
了旗帜的设计,

什么是好旗帜,
什么是坏旗帜,

你几乎可以理解
任何东西的设计。

所以我要在这里做的是,

我打开
我的广播节目的一集,

“99% 隐形”,我要
在舞台上重建它,

所以当我在这里按下一个按钮时——

语音 : S for Sound –

Roman Mars:它会发出声音

,所以每当你听到声音
或声音或一段音乐时,

都是因为我按下了一个按钮。

声音:声音。

RM:好的,明白了吗? 开始了。

三,二。

这是 99% 不可见的。 我是罗马马尔斯。

(音乐)

旁白:国旗设计的五项基本
原则。

Roman Mars:根据
北美植物学协会。

绒毛学的。

Ted Kaye:旗帜学
是对旗帜的研究。

RM:就是那个额外的“lol
”让它听起来很奇怪。

旁白:第一,保持简单。

旗帜应该很简单
,孩子可以凭记忆画出来。

RM:在我 2005 年搬到芝加哥之前,

我什至不知道城市
有自己的旗帜。

TK:大多数大城市都有旗帜。

RM:嗯,我不知道
,顺便说一句,那是 Ted Kaye。

TK:你好。

RM:他是一个旗帜专家,
他是一个非常棒的人。

TK:我是 Ted Kaye,我编辑
了一本关于旗帜研究的学术期刊

,目前我参与
了波特兰旗帜协会

和北美
旗帜学协会的工作。

RM: Ted 从字面上写
了一本关于旗帜设计的书。

旁白:“好旗,坏旗。”

RM:它更像是一本小册子,真的
,大约有 16 页。

TK:是的,它被称为“好旗,坏旗:
如何设计一面伟大的旗帜”。

RM:我在芝加哥发现的第一面城市旗帜

很漂亮:

白色区域,两条蓝色水平条纹,中间

有四颗六角
红星。

(声音)

旁白:第二,
使用有意义的象征。

TK:蓝色条纹
代表水、河流和湖泊。

旁白:国旗的图像、
颜色或图案

应与其所象征的内容相关。

TK:红星代表
芝加哥历史上的重大事件。

RM:也就是说,
在未来的芝加哥遗址上建立迪尔伯恩堡,

芝加哥大火

,世界哥伦比亚博览会
,每个人都

因为白城而记住,

以及进步世纪博览会
,没有人记得。

旁白:第三,
使用两到三种基本颜色。

TK:颜色的基本规则是

使用标准颜色集中的两到三种颜色:
红色、白色、蓝色、绿色、黄色和黑色。

RM:芝加哥国旗的设计
完全融入

了整个城市的横截面。

它无处不在;

每座市政大楼都悬挂着国旗。

Whet Moser:在我工作的地方附近
的每个街区可能至少有一家商店

出售
某种芝加哥国旗用具。

RM:那是芝加哥杂志的 Whet Moser

WM:今天,举个例子,
我去理发

,当我坐在理发椅上时,理发师把所有工具都

放在里面的盒子上有一面芝加哥国旗

然后在镜子里,有
我身后墙上的芝加哥国旗。

当我离开时,一个人从我身边经过
,他的背包上有芝加哥国旗徽章。

RM:它具有适应性和可混合性。

尤其是
六角星出现在各种地方。

WM:前几天我买的咖啡上
有一颗芝加哥明星。

RM:这
是芝加哥自豪感的独特象征。

TK:当一名警察
或消防员在芝加哥死亡时,

通常不是
他棺材上的美国国旗。

它可以是芝加哥市的旗帜。

这就是旗帜
在芝加哥的公民形象中的深入程度。

RM:不仅仅是人们
喜欢芝加哥,因此也喜欢这面旗帜。

我也认为人们更喜欢芝加哥,
因为国旗很酷。

TK:
伟大的象征意义和公民自豪感之间的正反馈循环。

RM:好的,所以当我
在 2008 年搬回旧金山时,

我研究了它的旗帜,

因为
在我住在那里的前八年里我从未见过它。

我找到了它,我很遗憾地说,

很遗憾地缺少它。

(笑声)

我知道。

也让我心疼。

(笑声)

TK:好吧,让我从头开始。

旁白:第一,保持简单。

TK:保持简单。

旁白:国旗应该很简单
,孩子可以凭记忆画出来。

TK:这是一个相对复杂的标志。

RM:好的,我们开始吧,好的。 旧金山国旗

的主要组成
部分是一只凤凰,

代表这座城市

在 1850 年代毁灭性大火后从灰烬中升起。

TK:旧金山的有力象征。

RM:我还没有真正挖掘凤凰。

在设计方面,它
设法既过于粗糙

又同时具有太多细节

,如果您尝试这样做,

您将无法做到,

而且它只是在远处看起来很糟糕,

但是有 深层含义
将该元素放在加号栏中。

凤凰背后
,底色以白色居多,

然后四周环绕着实实在在的
金色边框。

TK:这是一个非常吸引人的
设计元素。

RM:我认为没关系,但是——

(笑声)

旗帜设计的大忌来了。

旁白:第四,
没有刻字或印章。

永远不要使用任何形式的写作。

RM:在凤凰的下方,
一条丝带上有一句格言

,意思是
“和平中的黄金,战争中的铁”,

另外——这是个大问题——

底部写着旧金山。

TK:如果你需要
在你的旗帜上写下你所代表的东西的名字,那么

你的象征意义就失败了。

(笑声)

(掌声)

RM:美国
国旗正面没有写“USA”。

事实上,国旗,
他们往往表现得很好。

就像,向南非
、土耳其、以色列

、索马里、日本和冈比亚致敬。


一堆非常棒的国旗,

但它们遵循良好的设计原则,
因为赌注很高。

他们在国际舞台上。

但城市、州和地区的旗帜
是另一回事。

(笑声

) 坏旗是一种祸害——

(笑声

) 他们必须被制止。

(笑声)

(掌声)

这就是真理,这就是敢。

第一步是认识
到我们有问题。

(笑声

) 很多人倾向于
认为好的设计

只是品味问题

,老实说,
有时确实如此,

但有时又不是,好吗?

(笑声)

这是 NAVA
旗帜设计原则的完整列表。

旁白:
旗帜设计的五项基本原则。

旁白:第一。
TK:保持简单。

旁白:第二个。
TK:使用有意义的象征。

旁白:第三。
TK:使用两到三种基本颜色。

旁白:第四。
TK:没有刻字或印章。

旁白:永远不要使用任何形式的文字。

TK:因为你无法
在远处阅读。

旁白:第五。
TK:而且要与众不同。

RM:所有最好的旗帜都
倾向于坚持这些原则。

就像我之前说的,
大多数国家的国旗都可以。

但事情是这样的:

如果你把这个原则列表展示
给几乎任何东西的设计师,

他们会说这些原则——
简单、深刻的含义

、很少的颜色
或对颜色深思熟虑、

独特性、没有
你能写的东西。 不读——

所有这些原则也适用于他们。

但遗憾的
是,美国城市标志很少引用良好的设计原则。

我们最大的问题
似乎是第四个问题。

我们只是无法阻止
自己将我们的名字放在我们的旗帜上,

或者
在上面写上小字的小市政印章上。

这是关于市政印章的事情:

它们被设计
成放在纸片

上,您可以阅读它们,

而不是在 100 英尺外
随风飘扬的旗帜上。

所以这里又是一堆标志。

Vexillologists 称这些为 SOB:

床单上的印章——

(笑声

) 如果你不知道
他们去哪个城市

,是的,这正是问题所在,

除了阿纳海姆,
显然,他们修好了。

(笑声)

这些旗帜在美国随处可见。

欧洲
相当于市政印章的

是城市纹章

……这是我们可以
学习如何正确做事的地方。

这就是阿姆斯特丹的市
徽。

现在,如果这是一个美国城市

,国旗可能看起来像这样。

你知道,是的。

(笑声)

但是相反,阿姆斯特丹的国旗是

这样的。

他们没有
将整个徽章

放在坚实的背景上并
在其下方写下“阿姆斯特丹”,

而是采用
了盾牌的关键元素,

并将其变成
了世界上最糟糕的城市旗帜。

(笑声)

(掌声

) 因为它是如此的糟糕,

那些旗帜和十字架
遍布阿姆斯特丹,

就像芝加哥一样,它们被使用。

尽管床单上的印章旗帜

对我来说特别痛苦和冒犯,但

没有什么能让你

为旗帜学历史上最大的火车残骸
之一做好准备。

(笑声)

你准备好了吗?

这是威斯康星州密尔沃基的旗帜。

(笑声)

我的意思是,它很独特,

我会给他们那个。

Steve Kodis:它在 1955 年被采用。

RM:这座城市举办了一场比赛

,收集了一堆
带有各种设计的作品。

SK:一位名叫 Fred Steffan 的市议员

将提交的部分内容拼凑在一起
,制成了现在的密尔沃基旗帜。

RM:这是一个厨房水槽标志。

有代表工业的巨大齿轮

有识别港口的船,有

向酿酒业致敬的巨大麦秆。

这是一团糟

,来自密尔沃基的平面设计师史蒂夫科迪斯
想要改变它。

SK:这真的很糟糕。 至少可以说

,这是代表这座城市的失误

RM:但是,
让密尔沃基国旗高高在上的地方,

几乎到了自我模仿的地步,

是密尔沃基军团的内战战旗图片。

SK:所以这是它的最后一个元素,它

让它变得更加荒谬,密尔沃基旗帜

中有一个旗帜设计

RM:在旗帜上。 是的。 是的。

(笑声)

是的。

(音乐)

现在,密尔沃基是一座梦幻般的城市。

我去过那里,我喜欢它。

然而
,这面旗帜最令人沮丧的部分

是有
两次重大的重新设计竞赛。

最后一届是在 2001 年举行的。

收到了 105 份参赛作品。

TK:但最后,
密尔沃基艺术委员会的成员

决定,没有一个新
作品值得飞越这座城市。

RM:他们不能
同意改变那件事!

(笑声)

这太令人沮丧了
,让你

认为好的设计和民主
根本不能并存。

(笑声)

但史蒂夫·科塔斯将
再次

尝试重新设计密尔沃基的旗帜。

SK:我相信密尔沃基是一座伟大的城市。

每个伟大的城市都应该有一面伟大的旗帜。

RM:史蒂夫还没有准备
好公开他的设计。

提出其中一件事情的其中一件事

是你必须让人们参与进来,

然后你才能展示你的设计。

但诀窍是:

如果你想设计一面很棒的旗帜,

像芝加哥或华盛顿的
旗,也有一面很棒的旗帜,

首先在上面画
一个一英寸半的

矩形 一张纸。

您的设计必须
适合那个小矩形。

这就是为什么。

TK:
在 100 英尺外的一根杆子上,一面 3 x 5 英尺的旗帜

看起来与距离您的眼睛约 15
英寸的 1 x 1.5 英寸的矩形大小相同

当您坚持自己的限制时,您会惊讶于设计是多么引人注目和简单。

RM:同时,回到旧金山。

我们可以做些什么吗?

TK:我喜欢说,在每一面坏旗
子里都有一面好旗子试图摆脱。

使
旧金山的旗帜成为好旗帜的方法

是取消座右铭,
因为您无法在远处阅读它。

把名字去掉

,边框甚至可能会加粗,
所以它更像是国旗的一部分。

我会简单地把凤凰放在旗帜中间

,让它成为一个很大的元素

RM:但是现在的凤凰,
那是必须的。

TK:我会简化
或风格化凤凰。

描绘一只大而宽翼的鸟

从火焰中出来。

强调那些火焰。

RM:所以这面旧金山旗帜
是由 Frank Chimero

根据 Ted Kaye 的建议设计的。

我不知道
如果我们完全不受约束

并且不遵循这些指导方针,他会怎么做。

我的广播节目和播客的粉丝们
听到我抱怨旗帜不好。

他们向我发送了其他建议的设计。

这是尼尔·穆塞特的。

两者都好多了。

(笑声)

我想如果他们被收养,

我会在城市周围看到他们。

在我让
世界旗帜更美丽的运动中,

许多
听众自己

重新设计了他们的旗帜,
并研究

了让它们正式采用的可行性。

(音乐)

如果你看到你的城市旗帜并喜欢它,

就让它飞起来,

即使它违反了一两条设计规则。

我不在乎。

但是如果你没有看到你的城市标志,

也许它不存在,但也许它确实存在,

而且它很糟糕

,我敢让你加入
努力来改变它。

随着我们越来越多地进入城市

,城市旗帜将
不仅成为该城市作为一个地方的象征

,而且还可能成为
该城市如何看待设计本身的象征,

尤其是在今天,随着
民众越来越多 设计意识。

而且我认为设计
意识处于历史最高水平。

精心设计的旗帜可以被
视为一个城市如何

考虑其所有设计系统的指标

:公共交通

、公园、标牌。

这可能看起来很轻浮,但事实并非如此。

TK:当市领导说,

“我们有比担心市旗更重要的事情要做
”时,

我的回答是,

“如果你有一面伟大的市旗,

你就会有一面旗帜
让人们团结

起来面对那些 更重要的事情。”

(音乐)

RM:我亲眼目睹
了芝加哥市旗

的作用。

良好的设计
和公民自豪感的结合

是我们在所有地方都需要的东西。

市政旗最好的部分
是我们拥有它们。

它们是社区的开源、

公有设计语言

当它们做得好时,

它们是可混合的,适应性强的,
并且功能强大。

我们可以

用一面好的旗帜来控制我们城市的品牌和图形图像,

但相反,通过
我们不使用的坏旗帜,

我们将这片领土让给了运动队

、商会
和旅游局。

运动队可以离开
并伤透我们的心。

此外,我们中的一些人
并不真正关心运动。

旅游活动可能只是俗气。

但是,一面伟大的城市

旗帜代表着
一座城市,代表着它的

人民,代表着整个世界的人民。

当那面旗帜是一件美好的事情时,

这种联系就是一件美好的事情。

所以也许所有的城市旗帜
都可以像香港

、波特兰或特隆赫姆一样鼓舞人心

,我们可以取消所有

像旧金山、密尔沃基、锡达拉皮兹这样的坏旗帜

,最后,当我们都完成后,

我们可以做到
关于爱达荷州波卡特洛的一些事情,

被北美
旗帜学协会

认为是北美最糟糕的城市旗帜。

[自豪地成为 Pocatello]

(笑声)

(掌声)

是的。

(鼓掌)

那东西上面有商标
符号,各位。

(笑声)

光是看着就让我心痛。

(笑声)

非常感谢你们的聆听。

(掌声)

[音乐:Melodium (@melodiumbox)
和 Keegan DeWitt (@keegandewitt)]