The mathematics of history JeanBaptiste Michel

so it turns out that mathematics is a

very powerful language it has generated

considerable insight in physics in

biology and in economics but not that

much in the humanities and in history I

think there’s the belief that is just

impossible that you cannot quantify the

doings of mankind but you cannot measure

history but I don’t think that’s right I

want to show you a couple of examples

why so my collaborator Aires and I were

considering the flow in fact the two

kings separated by centuries will speak

a very different language that’s a

powerful historical force so the king of

England after the great will use the

vocabulary and grammar that is quite

different from the king of hip-hop

jay-z now it’s just the way it is

language changes over time and it’s a

powerful force

so Aries and I wanted to know more about

that so we paid attention to a

particular grammatical rule past tense

conjugation so you just add eg to a verb

at the end to signify the past today I

walk yesterday I walked but some verbs

are irregular yesterday I thought well

now what’s interesting about that is

irregular verbs between Alfred and JZ

have become more regular like the verb

to Wed that you see here has become

regular so everything I followed the

fate of over 100 irregular verbs through

12 centuries of English language and we

saw that there’s actually a very simple

mathematical pattern that captures this

complex historical change namely if a

verb is a hundred times more frequent

than another it regularizes ten times

slower that’s a piece of history but it

comes in a mathematical wrapping now in

some cases math can even help explain or

proposed explanations for historical

forces

so here’s chief tinker and I were

considering the magnitude of Wars during

the last two centuries there’s actually

a well known regularity to them where

the number of wars that are hundred

times deadlier is ten times smaller so

there are thirty wars that are about as

deadly as the six days war there’s only

four wars that are 100 times deadlier

like world war 1 so what kind of

historical mechanism can produce that

what’s the region of this so Steve and I

through mathematical analysis proposed

that there’s actually a very simple

phenomena at the root of this which

which lies in our brains this is a

well-known feature which we perceive

quantities in relative ways the

quantities like the intensity of light

or the loudness of a sound for instance

committing 10,000 soldiers to the next

battle sounds like a lot it’s relatively

enormous if you’ve already committed

1,000 soldiers previously but it doesn’t

sound so much it’s not relatively enough

it won’t make a difference if you’ve

already committed a hundred thousand

soldiers previously so you see that

because of the way we perceive

quantities as the war drags on the

number of soldiers committed to it and

the casualties will increase not

linearly like 10,000 11,000 12,000 but

exponentially 10,000 later 20,000 Native

40,000 and so that explains this pattern

that we’ve seen before

so here mathematics is able to link the

well-known feature of the individual

mind with a long-term pattern a

historical pattern that unfolds over

centuries and across continents so this

type of examples today they’re just few

of them but I think that in the next

decade they will become commonplace the

reason for that is that the historical

record is becoming digitized at very

fast pace so there’s about 130 million

books that have been written since the

dawn of time companies like Google have

which as many of them above 20 million

actually and when the stuff of history

is available in digital form it makes it

possible for mathematical analysis to

very quickly and very conveniently

reveal trends in our history in our

culture so I think as in the next decade

in the sciences and the humanities will

come closer together to be able to

answer deep questions about mankind and

I think that mathematics will be a very

powerful language to do that it will be

able to reveal new trends in our history

sometimes to explain them and maybe even

in the future to predict what’s going to

happen thank you very much

所以事实证明,数学是一种

非常强大的语言,它

在物理学、生物学和经济学中产生了相当多的洞察力,

在人文学科和历史

上却

没有那么多

但你无法衡量

历史,但我认为这是

不对的

历史力量,所以

伟大之后的英格兰国王将使用与

嘻哈之王

jay-z 完全不同的

词汇

和语法 想知道更多

,所以我们注意了一个

特定的语法规则过去时

共轭,所以你只需在动词末尾添加 eg

来表示今天我走路的过去

昨天我走路但是有些

动词不规则昨天我想好了

现在有趣的是

Alfred和JZ之间的不规则动词

变得更加规则就像

你在这里看到的Wed动词变得

规则所以一切我都遵循

了100多个不规则动词的命运 动词通过

12 个世纪的英语,我们

看到实际上有一个非常简单的

数学模式可以捕捉到这种

复杂的历史变化,即如果一个

动词比另一个动词频率高 100 倍,

它正则化的

速度要慢 10 倍,这是一段历史,但它

出现了 现在的数学包装在

某些情况下,数学甚至可以帮助解释或

提出对历史力量的解释,

所以这里的首席修补匠和我正在

考虑

过去两个世纪中战争的规模,实际上

他们有一个众所周知的规律,其中

战争的数量是 一

百倍致命是十倍小所以

有三十场战争大约是

致命的 作为六日战争,只有

四场战争的杀伤力

是第一次世界大战的 100 倍,那么什么样的

历史机制可以产生

这个区域是什么,所以史蒂夫和我

通过数学分析提出

,根源实际上是一个非常简单的

现象

其中存在于我们的大脑中,这是一个

众所周知的特征,我们

以相对的方式感知数量,

例如光的强度

或声音的响度等数量,例如

在下一场战斗中投入 10,000 名士兵

听起来很多,这是相对的

如果您之前已经投入了

1,000 名士兵,那么这将是巨大的,但

听起来并不多,相对来说还不够

,如果您之前

已经投入了 10000

名士兵,那么这不会有什么不同,所以您会看到,

因为我们感知的方式

随着战争拖累投入战斗

的士兵数量

,伤亡人数不会

像 10,000 11,000 12,000 那样呈线性增加,而是

呈指数增长 lly 10,000 后来 20,000 Native

40,000 这样就解释

了我们以前见过的这种模式,

所以这里的数学能够

将个体思维的众所周知的特征

与长期模式联系起来,这是

一个跨越

几个世纪和跨越大陆的历史模式 所以

今天这种类型的例子只是其中的一小

部分,但我认为在未来

十年它们将变得司空见惯,

原因是历史

记录正以非常

快的速度数字化,所以大约有 1.3 亿

本书被

谷歌等公司

从一开始就有超过 2000 万的公司

,当

历史资料以数字形式提供

时,数学分析可以

非常快速和方便地

揭示我们历史中的趋势

因此,我认为在接下来的十年

里,科学和人文学科将

更加紧密地联系在一起,能够

回答关于人类和

我认为数学将是一种非常

强大的语言,它

可以揭示我们历史上的新趋势,

有时可以解释它们,

甚至可以预测未来会

发生什么,非常感谢