Do 9 out of 10 dentists really recommend that toothpaste Am I Normal with Mona Chalabi

Transcriber:

When it comes to toothpaste commercials,

you’ve probably heard claims like,

nine out of 10 dentists
recommend “Brighter, Whiter.”

Or maybe it’s four
out of five or 80 percent.

But either way, these companies expect
you to see a wall of white coats,

trust their authority
and think no further.

Now that approach is basically BS,
and you probably know it’s BS,

but the question is:
How can you trust your BS radar?

[Am I Normal? with Mona Chalabi]

Well, when I’m faced
with suspicious statistics,

I tend to ask myself three questions.

First, what were people actually asked?

Sometimes the question
that is put to survey respondents

is wildly different than the one
that ends up on posters and billboards.

For instance, in 2007,
one toothpaste ad in the UK

claimed that more than 80 percent
of dentists recommended their products.

What that sounds like

is that a majority of dentists prefer
their product over all others,

that those dentists were asked
if this was the best product.

But when the Advertising Standards
Authority looked into it,

they discovered that the dentists were
asked to recommend several toothpastes,

not one single choice.

In fact, another brand
was found to be almost as popular.

To no one’s surprise,
the ad was deemed misleading.

Now, the second question to ask is:
What aren’t you telling me?

In the 1970s, a sugarless gum company
claimed that four out five dentists

recommended their product.

Now, their slogan was pretty upfront

about the fact that these dentists
were only recommending the product

to people who already chewed gum,

but they weren’t so forthcoming
about the fifth dentist.

Decades later, the manufacturer
made fun of it in a new ad campaign

where they blamed the fifth
dentist’s different thinking

on a freak accident,
like a sudden squirrel bite.

Now, since I’m all about
the deviations in the data,

I decided to look into this
a little bit further.

In fact, it’s not that the fifth dentist
recommended chewing sugary gum.

What they don’t say
is that most of them recommended

that their patients don’t chew gum at all.

The last thing to ask is:
What was the survey context?

Because there’s a really big difference

between saying “nine
out of 10 dentists agree,”

and “nine out of these 10 dentists agree.”

Size matters and so does methodology.

According to the American
Dental Association,

there are about 200,000
registered dentists in the US.

I’m not going to bore you
with the maths here,

but to get a statistically significant
sample of 200,000 people,

you need about 400.

So if you’re reading in the fine print
that only 50 dentists were surveyed,

you know that’s not
statistically significant.

It’s just a marketing ploy.

So the next time you see one of these ads,

ask yourself:

What were people actually asked?

What’s gone unsaid?

And what was the survey context?

Hopefully, with those three questions
and a little bit of skepticism,

you will be able to understand
when the data is legit

and when it’s irrelevant.

Nine out of 10 Monas agree.

[*No such survey
took place]

抄写员

:谈到牙膏广告,

你可能听说过这样的说法,

十分之九的牙医
推荐“更亮,更白”。

或者可能是
五分之四或 80%。

但无论哪种方式,这些公司都希望
你看到一堵白大褂的墙,

相信他们的权威
,不要再想了。

现在这种方法基本上是 BS
,你可能知道它是 BS,

但问题是:
你怎么能相信你的 BS 雷达?

【我正常吗? 与 Mona Chalabi]

好吧,当我
面对可疑的统计数据时,

我倾向于问自己三个问题。

首先,人们实际上问了什么?

有时,
向调查受访者提出的问题与

最终出现在海报和广告牌上的问题大不相同。

例如,2007 年,
英国的一则牙膏广告

声称,超过 80%
的牙医推荐他们的产品。

这听起来

像是大多数牙医
比所有其他牙医更喜欢他们的产品

,这些牙医被问到
这是否是最好的产品。

但当广告标准
局调查时,

他们发现牙医被
要求推荐几种牙膏,

而不是一种选择。

事实上,发现另一个品牌
几乎同样受欢迎。

不出所料,
该广告被认为具有误导性。

现在,要问的第二个问题是:
你不告诉我什么?

在 1970 年代,一家无糖口香糖公司
声称,五分之四的牙医

推荐了他们的产品。

现在,他们的口号非常

明确,即这些牙医
只向

已经嚼过口香糖的人推荐该产品,

但对于第五位牙医,他们并没有那么坦率

几十年后,制造商
在一个新的广告活动中取笑它

,他们将第五位
牙医的不同想法

归咎于一次奇怪的事故,
比如突然的松鼠咬伤。

现在,由于我关心
的是数据中的偏差,所以

我决定进一步研究
一下。

其实,并不是第五位牙医
推荐嚼含糖口香糖。

他们没有说的
是,他们中的大多数人

建议他们的病人根本不要嚼口香糖。

最后要问的是:
调查的背景是什么?

因为

说“
十个牙医中有九个同意”

和“这10个牙医中有九个同意”之间存在很大差异。

规模很重要,方法论也很重要。

根据美国
牙科协会的数据,美国

约有 200,000 名
注册牙医。

我不会在
这里用数学

来让你厌烦,但要获得 200,000 人的统计显着
样本,

你需要大约 400 人。

所以,如果你
读到只有 50 名牙医接受调查的细则,

你知道那不是
具有统计学意义。

这只是一种营销策略。

所以下次你看到这些广告时,

问问自己:

人们实际上问了什么?

什么没说?

调查的背景是什么?

希望通过这三个问题
和一点点怀疑,

您将能够理解
数据何时是合法的

,何时是不相关的。

十分之九的莫娜同意。

[*没有进行此类调查
]