How to support witnesses of harassment and build healthier workplaces Julia Shaw

Transcriber: Ivana Korom
Reviewer: Krystian Aparta

I’m Dr. Julia Shaw,

a research associate
at University College London,

and the cofounder of Spot.

Spot is a tool that helps organizations
tackle harassment and discrimination

with better reporting options
and better training.

And in 2019,

along with Dr. Camilla Elphick
and Dr. Rashid Minhas,

and a number of international
NGOs and charities,

we conducted one
of the largest studies ever

on witnesses of harassment
and discrimination at work.

Why witnesses?

The first time that I was victimized

and became the target
of inappropriate workplace behavior,

I hadn’t even left university.

A couple of academics
who were far more senior than me

repeatedly and relentlessly targeted me.

And every time something happened,

I wished that someone would speak up.

That they would tell me
that I’m not overreacting,

that I’m sane,

that there’s something that we could do.

But instead,

I found myself with reporting paralysis.

I didn’t speak up

and neither did most other people.

Why didn’t I just speak up?

Well, I was worried
about the consequences for my career,

because I loved my work.

I was also worried about things
that many people see as barriers,

like not being believed
or taken seriously,

like my situation resulting in no change.

Luckily, over the past couple of years,

we’ve seen that reporting paralysis
is affecting fewer people

and some people
are able to now have voices

who before were voiceless.

When we first started Spot,

we allowed people to submit statements

about experiencing harassment
or discrimination

to talktospot.com.

And as researchers,
we looked at these stories,

and we were shocked when we found

that 93 percent of victims reported
that there was at least one witness.

These things aren’t happening
behind closed doors.

Further research has since come out

which has further repeated this idea

that most harassment
and discrimination is witnessed.

And so how do we mobilize these witnesses?

First, let’s talk about the psychology
of being a witness.

In 2018, two women were at a Starbucks

when they watched a barista
deny access to a washroom

to two African American men.

Instead, the barista called the police.

The two active bystanders
took a video of the men in handcuffs

and posted it online.

This active bystanding
had an almost immediate positive effect.

Starbucks closed a number of its doors
and implemented bias training.

Most of us think that we would be
these active bystanders.

That we would be these kinds of heroes.

In fact, in research on this,

when researchers give people
hypothetical scenarios

and ask if they would intervene,

most of us say, “Yes, of course,
of course I would stand up.”

But even when those same researchers

present an actual physical situation
where someone needs to actually intervene,

most people do nothing.

And they fall prey
to the well-known bystander effect.

Why?

And what are the barriers
that people are facing?

In our research,

three quarters of people
who we had interviewed

and who we had participate in our study –

which was over 1,000 participants –

three quarters of them said

that they never reported
the incident to HR,

they never reported the incident

to someone who could do
something about it.

And the barriers that they cited?

The number one barrier
was actually the exact same

as the main barrier that victims report,

which is the fear
of consequences or retaliation.

Even witnesses are worried
about what might happen

to them and their careers.

Other reasons that people reported

was not wanting to interfere
or not wanting to be a snitch,

not knowing they could report,
or not knowing how.

All of these things can be targeted

with better education
and better systems in workplaces.

But the story of the witness
isn’t complete

without also talking
about the consequences

for the witnesses themselves.

If you were to see someone
who just witnessed a crime

being committed on the street,

you would almost certainly
go up to that witness

and say, “Are you OK?

Do you need some support?”

You might even offer them
counseling or therapy

to process what they just saw.

But witnesses at work
are largely invisible.

And of course, so is support for them.

And some of this invisibility
might even be internalized.

When we asked our participants
about reporting,

and when we asked them
about the negative consequences for them,

we found that most people said,
when asked directly,

“Did witnessing this experience
have a negative repercussion?”

Most people said, “No, I’m fine.”

But when we looked
at the qualitative entries,

when we looked at what people
actually wrote about this experience,

we found that these experiences
had profoundly negative impacts.

They increased stress
and anxiety and depression,

they increased the prevalence
of desire to leave the organization,

loss of faith.

Why is there this discrepancy?

It seems that we’re doing
a comparative evaluation.

“Compared to the victim,

nothing really happened to me.”

But that’s not really the right question.

And support shouldn’t be invisible

just because you’re less affected.

Because we’re all affected

and we should all
be supporting each other.

We also found evidence
of a social contagion.

While 23 percent of participants told HR,

more, 46 percent, told colleagues,
usually someone on their team,

and 67 percent told
someone outside of work.

What this shows is that the negative
consequences of the situation,

where someone is harassed
or discriminated against,

go far beyond the room.

People take that story with them

and that discontent grows
as they tell more and more people,

and this has the real effect

that is almost certainly threatening
your ability as an organization

to retain and attract
diverse and excellent candidates.

So what do we do to stop
this social contagion?

What do we do to reduce these barriers

and how do we provide support
for witnesses and victims?

How can we be better allies?

And it’s easier than you might think.

In my research, I’ve come across
five particular things

that I think every organization
can and should do

to help tackle this issue

and to build healthier workplaces.

First, showcase your commitment.

If your leadership isn’t repeatedly saying

how important diversity
and inclusion is to them,

and living by example,

no one is going to believe you.

An HR-driven campaign is insufficient.

Your organization is a direct mirror
of its leadership team,

and they need to be setting the tone.

Second, train your managers.

The main person who’s likely to harass
someone in your organization

is a manager.

Now, why?

Perhaps because power corrupts,

or perhaps because we promote people
into managerial roles

because they’re excellent at their jobs,

and we assume that they will pick up
the people skills,

pick up the management
skills along the way.

But then they don’t.

And this provides a fertile ground
for harassment and discrimination

with unrealistic expectations,

with poor time management,

with poor conflict management skills.

Train your managers.

Third, we know from research on victims

that without the ability
to report anonymously,

the fear of consequences
is so overwhelming

that most people
will never report incidents.

We found the same was true for witnesses.

When we asked them directly, in our study,

whether organizations could do something

to improve the fact
that they might report,

they said, number one
that they could do better

was allowing for witness anonymity.

Second was providing choices
about who to report to.

Perhaps shockingly,

although managers
are the most likely person

to be perpetrating harassment
or discrimination,

in many organizations

they’re also supposed to be
your first point of contact

when things go wrong.

Now that’s a major sticking point.

So being able to choose
who you go to is crucial.

Third, encouraging witness reporting.

Back to setting a tone
in your organization,

saying you can and should report things,

and you can help stand up for each other.

Fourth, even when you have
all of this in place,

most people will not speak to HR.

We know this, because at Spot,

we though anonymity
would solve everything.

It did not.

Anonymity is one piece of the puzzle.

Conducting surveys means
that you go out to your employees,

you don’t wait for them to come to you.

And you ask everybody about how they feel

about the health of inclusion
and diversity efforts

within the organization.

And be specific.

Ask people about specific incidents
or specific things they’ve witnessed.

Because just like in our survey,

if you ask people directly

if they have experienced
harassment or discrimination,

the default answer is no.

But if you ask about specific experiences
or specific behaviors,

most people go, “Oh, yeah,
I saw that the other week.”

So making sure you ask
the right questions is crucial.

Finally, and most importantly,

research shows that one of the best ways
to mitigate the bystander effect

is to build a shared social identity.

It’s not about policing each other,

it’s not about calling each other out,

it’s about being a cohesive unit.

We are in this together.

If you attack one of us,

you are attacking all of us.

Because wouldn’t you want that?

Wouldn’t you want someone to stand by you
if something negative happens?

We’re all, hopefully, collectively
building an organization

that is stronger and healthier
and more diverse and inclusive.

Without my allies, I wouldn’t be here.

When I was first targeted
with inappropriate behavior at work,

I fell into a depression,

and I almost left academia altogether.

Without a few people who stood by me,

I wouldn’t be on this stage right now.

And I wish I had a happy ending for you.

But unfortunately,
these individuals are still at it.

You see, in organizational structures
where colleagues work in dispersed ways,

where it’s difficult to know
who even to report to,

never mind what the consequences might be,

these kinds of behaviors
are most likely to flourish for longer.

But that doesn’t stop me
from trying to stop it.

And I can tell you one thing –

that over the past
couple of years of my research,

I have found that there have been
so many positive changes.

Changes in legislation,

changes in attitudes,

and organizations are finally
taking these issues seriously.

I swear, the time of the harassers
and the bullies and the discriminators

is coming to an end.

Thank you.

(Applause)

抄写员:Ivana Korom
审稿人:Krystian Aparta

我是 Julia Shaw 博士,

伦敦大学学院的研究员,

也是 Spot 的联合创始人。

Spot 是一种工具,可帮助组织

通过更好的报告选项
和更好的培训来应对骚扰和歧视。

2019 年,我们

与 Camilla
Elphick 博士和 Rashid Minhas 博士

以及一些国际
非政府组织和慈善机构一起

,对工作中的骚扰和歧视证人进行
了有史以来规模最大的研究之一

为什么是证人?

我第一次

成为受害者并成为
不当工作场所行为的目标时,

我什至还没有离开大学。

几个
比我年长得多的学者

反复无情地针对我。

每次发生什么事,

我都希望有人能说出来。

他们会告诉我
,我没有反应过度

,我很清醒

,我们可以做点什么。

但相反,

我发现自己报告瘫痪。

我没有说话

,大多数其他人也没有说话。

为什么我不直接说出来?

好吧,我
担心我的职业生涯会受到影响,

因为我热爱我的工作。

我也
担心很多人认为是障碍的事情,

比如不被相信或不被
认真对待,

比如我的情况没有改变。

幸运的是,在过去的几年里,

我们看到报告
瘫痪影响的人越来越少

,有些人
现在能够发出

以前没有声音的声音。

当我们第一次启动 Spot 时,

我们允许人们向 talktospot.com 提交

有关遭受骚扰
或歧视

的陈述。

作为研究人员,
我们查看了这些故事,

当我们

发现 93% 的受害者报告
说至少有一名证人时,我们感到震惊。

这些事情不是在闭门造车的情况下发生的

此后的

进一步研究进一步重复了这一观点

,即目睹了大多数骚扰
和歧视。

那么我们如何动员这些证人呢?

首先,让我们谈谈
作为证人的心理。

2018 年,两名女性在星巴克

看到一名咖啡师

拒绝两名非裔美国男性进入洗手间。

相反,咖啡师报了警。

两名活跃的旁观者
拍摄了这些男子戴着手铐的视频

并将其发布到网上。

这种积极的旁观
几乎立即产生了积极影响。

星巴克关闭了许多大门
并实施了偏见培训。

我们大多数人认为我们会成为
这些积极的旁观者。

我们会成为这样的英雄。

事实上,在这方面的研究中,

当研究人员给人们
假设情景

并询问他们是否会干预时,

我们大多数人都会说,“是的,当然
,我当然会站出来。”

但即使这些研究人员

提出了
需要有人实际干预的实际物理情况,

大多数人也无所作为。

他们
成为众所周知的旁观者效应的牺牲品。

为什么?

人们面临的障碍
是什么?

在我们的研究中,

我们采访过的四分之三的

人和我们参与过我们研究的人

——超过 1000 名参与者——

其中四分之三的人

说他们从未
向 HR 报告过这件事,

他们从未向某人报告过这件事

谁能为此
做点什么。

他们引用的障碍是什么?

第一大
障碍实际上与

受害者报告的主要障碍完全相同,即

对后果或报复的恐惧。

甚至目击者也担心

他们和他们的职业生涯可能会发生什么。

人们报告的其他原因

是不想干预
或不想成为告密者,

不知道他们可以报告,
或者不知道如何报告。

所有这些事情都可以

通过更好的教育
和更好的工作场所系统来解决。

但是,

如果不讨论

证人本身的后果,证人的故事就不完整。

如果你看到
有人刚刚目睹

了街头犯罪,

你几乎肯定
会走到那个目击者

面前说:“你还好吗?

你需要一些支持吗?”

您甚至可以为他们
提供咨询或治疗,

以处理他们刚刚看到的内容。

但工作
中的目击者在很大程度上是隐形的。

当然,对他们的支持也是如此。

这种不可见性
甚至可能被内化。

当我们询问我们的参与者
关于报告的问题,

以及当我们询问他们
对他们造成的负面影响时,

我们发现大多数人
在被直接问到时会说:

“目睹这种经历
是否有负面影响?”

大多数人说,“不,我很好。”

但是当我们
查看定性条目时,

当我们查看人们
实际写的关于这次经历的内容时,

我们发现这些经历
产生了深远的负面影响。

他们增加了压力
、焦虑和抑郁,

他们增加
了离开组织的欲望、

失去信念的普遍性。

为什么会出现这种差异?

看来我们正在做
一个比较评估。

“与受害者相比,

我真的什么都没发生。”

但这并不是一个真正正确的问题。

支持不应该

仅仅因为你受到的影响较小而无形。

因为我们都受到影响

,我们都
应该互相支持。

我们还发现
了社会传染的证据。

虽然 23% 的参与者告诉人力资源部,但

更多(46%)告诉同事,
通常是他们团队中的某个人

,67%
告诉工作之外的人。

这表明

,某人受到骚扰
或歧视的情况的负面后果

远远超出了房间。

人们带着这个故事,

当他们告诉越来越多的人时,不满情绪会

增加,

这几乎肯定会威胁到
你作为一个

组织留住和吸引
多样化和优秀候选人的能力。

那么我们该怎么做才能阻止
这种社会传染呢?

我们如何减少这些障碍

,我们如何
为证人和受害者提供支持?

我们怎样才能成为更好的盟友?

它比你想象的要容易。

在我的研究中,我发现了

件我认为每个组织
都可以而且应该做的事情

来帮助解决这个问题

并建立更健康的工作场所。

首先,展示你的承诺。

如果你的领导层没有反复说

多样性
和包容性对他们有多重要,

并且以身作则,那么

没有人会相信你。

人力资源驱动的活动是不够的。

您的组织是其领导团队的直接镜子

,他们需要定下基调。

其次,培训你的经理。

可能骚扰
组织中某人的主要人员

是经理。

现在,为什么?

也许是因为权力腐败,

或者也许是因为我们提拔
人们担任管理职务,

因为他们在工作中表现出色,

并且我们假设他们会
学习人际交往技能,

并在此过程中学习管理
技能。

但后来他们没有。

这为

具有不切实际的期望

、时间

管理不善、冲突管理技能差的骚扰和歧视提供了肥沃的土壤。

培训你的经理。

第三,我们从对受害者的研究中

了解到,如果没有
匿名报告的能力,

对后果的恐惧
就会如此强烈

,以至于大多数人
永远不会报告事件。

我们发现证人也是如此。

当我们在研究中直接询问他们,

组织是否可以采取

措施改善
他们可能报告的事实时,

他们说
,他们可以做得更好的第一

件事是允许证人匿名。

其次是提供
关于向谁报告的选择。

也许令人震惊的是,

尽管经理
是最有

可能实施骚扰
或歧视的人,但

在许多组织中,当出现问题时,

他们也应该是
您的第一联系人

现在这是一个主要的症结所在。

所以能够
选择你去的人是至关重要的。

三是鼓励证人举报。

回到
在你的组织中设定基调,

说你可以而且应该报告事情

,你们可以互相帮助。

第四,即使你已经
做好了这一切,

大多数人也不会和 HR 说话。

我们知道这一点,因为在 Spot,

我们认为匿名
可以解决所有问题。

它没。

匿名是难题之一。

进行调查
意味着你要去找你的员工,

而不是等他们来找你。

你问每个人他们

对组织内包容性和多元化工作的健康状况的看法

并且要具体。

向人们询问
他们所目睹的特定事件或特定事物。

因为就像在我们的调查中一样,

如果您直接

询问人们是否经历过
骚扰或歧视

,默认答案是否定的。

但是如果你问到具体的经历
或具体的行为,

大多数人会说,“哦,是的,
我前一周看到了。”

因此,确保您
提出正确的问题至关重要。

最后,也是最重要的,

研究表明,减轻旁观者效应的最佳方法之一

是建立共享的社会身份。

这不是要互相监督

,也不是要互相呼唤,

而是要成为一个有凝聚力的单位。

我们一起做的。

如果你攻击我们中的一个,

你就是在攻击我们所有人。

因为你不想这样吗?

如果发生负面的事情,你不想有人站在你身边吗?

希望我们所有人都能共同
建立

一个更强大、更健康
、更多样化和更具包容性的组织。

没有我的盟友,我就不会在这里。

当我第一次
在工作中因不当行为而受到攻击时,

我陷入了抑郁,

几乎完全离开了学术界。

如果没有几个人站在我身边,

我现在就不会站在这个舞台上。

我希望我有一个幸福的结局给你。

但不幸的是,
这些人仍在努力。

你看,
在同事分散工作的组织结构中

,甚至很难知道
向谁报告,

更不用说后果可能是什么,

这些
行为最有可能盛行更长时间。

但这并不能阻止
我试图阻止它。

我可以告诉你一件事

——在过去
几年的研究中,

我发现
有很多积极的变化。

立法的

变化、态度的变化

和组织的变化终于开始
认真对待这些问题。

我发誓,骚扰者
、欺凌者和歧视

者的时代即将结束。

谢谢你。

(掌声)