What a digital government looks like Anna Piperal

Almost 30 years ago,

my country was facing the need
to rebuild everything from scratch.

After years of Soviet occupation,

Estonia regained its independence,
but we were left with nothing.

No infrastructure,
no administration, no legal code.

Organizational chaos.

Out of necessity,

the state leaders back then
had to make some daring choices.

The ones that our country could afford.

There was a lot of
experimentation and uncertainty

but also a bit of luck involved,

particularly in the fact
that we could count on a number

of brilliant visionaries,

cryptographers and engineers.

I was just a kid back then.

Today, we are called
the most digital society on earth.

I’m from Estonia,

and we’ve been declaring
taxes online since 2001.

We have been using digital identity
and signature since 2002.

We’ve been voting online since 2005.

And for today, pretty much
the whole range of the public services

that you can imagine:

education, police,
justice, starting a company,

applying for benefits,
looking at your health record

or challenging a parking ticket –

that’s everything that is done online.

In fact, it’s much easier to tell you

what are the three things
we cannot yet do online.

We have to show up
to pick up our ID documents,

get married or divorced,

or sell real estate.

That’s pretty much it.

So, that’s why don’t freak out

when I tell you that every year

I can’t wait to start
doing my tax declaration.

(Laughter)

Because all I have to do

is sit on my couch with a mobile phone,

swipe a few pages with prefilled data
on income and deductions

and hit submit.

After three minutes,

I’m looking at the tax return amount.

It actually feels like
a quite rewarding experience.

No tax advisors,

no collecting receipts,

no doing the math.

And have I mentioned
that I have not visited a state office

for almost seven years?

Indeed, one of the features
of the modern life

that has no reason to exist anymore,

considering technological
possibilities of today,

is the labyrinth of bureaucracy.

We’ve almost got rid of it
completely in Estonia,

in an effort coordinated by the government
that has also digitized itself.

For instance, cabinet of ministers' work
in e-Cabinet is absolutely paperless.

The central idea behind this development

is transformation of the state role

and digitalization of trust.

Think about it.

In most countries, people
don’t trust their governments.

And the governments don’t trust them back.

And all the complicated
paper-based formal procedures

are supposed to solve that problem.

Except that they don’t.

They just make life more complicated.

I believe Estonian experience is showing
that technology can be the remedy

for getting the trust back,

while creating an efficient,

user-centric service delivery system

that actively responds to citizens' needs.

We did not do it by digitizing
bureaucracy as it is.

But by rather agreeing
on a few strong, common principles,

redesigning rules and procedures,

getting rid of unnecessary data collection

and task duplication,

and becoming open and transparent.

Let me give you a glimpse

into some of the key e-Estonia
design principles today.

First, it is essential to guarantee
privacy and confidentiality

of data and information.

This is achieved
through a strong digital identity

that is issued by the state

and compatible with everything.

In fact, every Estonian has one.

The identity is doubled
with a strong digital signature

that is accepted, used and legally binding

both in Estonia and the European Union.

When the system can properly
and securely identify who is using it,

after logging in, it will provide access
to the personal data of the citizen

and all the public services
within one tool,

and allow to authorize anything
by signing digitally.

A second principle,
and one of the most transformative,

is called “Once only.”

It means that the state
cannot ask for the same data

more than once,

nor can store it in more than one place.

For instance,

if you’ve already provided
your birth or marital certificate

to the population registry,

this is the only place
where this data is going to be held.

And no other institution
will be ever asking for it again.

Once only is a very powerful rule,

as it defines the whole structure
of the data collection in a country,

what information is collected

and who is responsible for maintaining it,

making sure we avoid
centralization of data,

duplication of data,

and guarantee that it’s
actually up to date.

This distributed approach
also avoids the problem

of the single point of failure.

But since the data cannot be replicated,

or collected more than once,

it means that the design
has to keep in mind

secure and robust access
to that information at all times,

so the public institution
can offer a service.

This is exactly the role
of the data exchange platform

called the X-Road

that has been in use since 2001.

Just like a highway,

it connects public sector
databases and registries,

local municipalities and businesses,

organizing a real-time, secure
and regulated data exchange,

saving an auditable trace after each move.

Here’s a screenshot of a live feed

showing all the requests
performed on the X-Road

and all the services
that it actually facilitates.

And this is the real picture

of all the connections between
public and private sector databases.

As you can see,

there is no central database whatsoever.

Confidentiality and privacy
are definitely very important.

But in the digital world,

reliability and integrity of information

is just critical for operations.

For instance,

if someone changes
your medical health record,

let’s say allergies,

without you or your doctor knowing,

treatment could be deadly.

That’s why in a digital society,
a system like an Estonian one,

when there’s almost no paper originals,

there’s almost only digital originals,

integrity of data,

data exchange rules, software components

and log files is paramount.

We use a form of blockchain
that we invented back in 2007,

way before blockchain even became a thing,

to check and guarantee
the integrity of data in real time.

Blockchain is our auditor

and a promise that no access to the data

or data manipulation remains unrecorded.

Data ownership is another key principle
in the design of the system.

Aren’t you worried by the fact
that governments, tech companies

and other businesses around the world

claim data they’ve collected
about you is theirs,

generally refuse to give access
to that information,

and often fail to prove how it was used

or shared with third parties?

I don’t know, for me it seems
like a quite disturbing situation.

The Estonian system
is based on the principle

that an individual is the owner
of the data collected about him,

thus has an absolute right
to know what information is collected

and who has been accessing it.

Every time a policeman,
a doctor or any state officer

is accessing personal information
of the citizens online,

first they only get to access it
after logging in

to the information they’re authorized
to see to do their job.

And secondly, every time
they’re making requests,

this is saved in a log file.

This detailed log file
is part of the state public services

and allows real transparency,

making sure no privacy violation
will remain unnoticed to the citizen.

Now, of course, this is only
a simplified summary

of all the design principles
that e-Estonia is built on.

And now, government is building up

to get ready for use
of artificial intelligence

and building a whole new generation
of public services –

proactive services

that would activate seamlessly

based on different life situations
that people might be in,

such as childbirth, unemployment
or starting a business.

Now, of course,

running a digital society
with no paper backup

can be an issue, right?

Even though we trust
our systems to be solid,

but one can never be too cautious
as we experienced back in 2007,

when the first cyberincident happened,

and it literally blocked
part of our networks,

making access to the services
impossible for hours.

We survived.

But this event put cybersecurity
at the very top of agenda,

both in terms of strengthening
the platform and backing it up.

So how do you back up
a country-wide system in a small state

where everything is super close?

Well for instance,
you can export a copy of the data

outside the country territory

to an extraterritorial
space of an embassy.

Today, we have those data embassies

that are holding the most critical
digital assets of Estonia,

guaranteeing continuity of operations,

protection of our data,

and most importantly, our sovereignty.

Even in case of a physical attack
on our territory.

Some of you might be thinking by now:

Where are the downsides?

Well, going all digital

is administratively, and let’s be honest,
financially more efficient.

Interfacing primarily
with computer systems

might create an impression
that the human factor,

elected politicians

and participating in democratic processes

is somehow less important.

And there are also some people

who feel threatened
by pervasive technology

that might make their skills obsolete.

So all in all, unfortunately,

running a country on a digital platform

has not saved us
from political power struggles

and polarization in the society,

as we have seen in the last elections.

Well, until there are humans involved.

One last question.

If everything is location-independent

and I can access all of the services
from anywhere in the world,

why cannot others
tap into some of these services,

even if they don’t reside
within Estonian borders?

Five years ago,

we launched a governmental start-up
called e-Residency program

that for today joins
tens of thousands of people.

These are businessmen and women
from 136 different countries,

who establish their
businesses digitally,

who do their banking online,

and who run their companies
virtually over e-Estonia platform,

within European Union legal framework,

using an e-identity card similar to mine

and all of that
from anywhere in the world.

The Estonian system
is location-independent

and user-centric.

It prioritizes inclusiveness,
openness and reliability.

It puts security
and transparency at its center.

And the data into the hands
of the rightful owner,

the person they refer to.

Don’t take my word for it.

Try it.

Thank you.

(Applause)

大约 30 年前,

我的国家面临着
从头开始重建一切的需要。

经过多年的苏联占领,

爱沙尼亚重新获得独立,
但我们一无所有。

没有基础设施,
没有管理,没有法律法规。

组织混乱。

出于必要,

当时的国家领导人
不得不做出一些大胆的选择。

我们国家负担得起的。

有很多
实验和不

确定性,但也有一点运气,

特别
是我们可以指望

一些才华横溢的远见卓识者、

密码学家和工程师。

那时我还只是个孩子。

今天,我们被称为
地球上最数字化的社会。

我来自爱沙尼亚,

自 2001 年以来我们一直在网上报税。自 2002 年以来,

我们一直在使用数字身份
和签名。

自 2005 年以来,我们一直在网上投票。

今天,
几乎所有的公共服务

您可以想象:

教育、警察、
司法、创办公司、

申请福利、
查看您的健康记录

或质疑停车罚单——

这就是在线完成的一切。

事实上,告诉你

哪些是
我们还不能在网上做的三件事要容易得多。

我们必须
到场领取我们的身份证件,

结婚或离婚,

或出售房地产。

差不多就是这样。

所以,这就是为什么

当我告诉你每年

我都迫不及待地开始
报税时,不要惊慌失措。

(笑声)

因为我所要做的

就是坐在沙发上拿着手机,

刷几页预先填写
的收入和扣除数据,

然后点击提交。

三分钟后,

我正在查看纳税申报表的金额。

这实际上是
一种非常有益的体验。

没有税务顾问,

没有收据,

没有做数学。

我有没有提到我已经将近七年没有访问过州政府办公室

了?

事实上,考虑到今天的技术可能性,
现代生活的一个特征

已经没有理由再存在了

,那

就是官僚机构的迷宫。

我们在爱沙尼亚几乎完全摆脱了它,这

是由政府协调的努力,政府
也已经将自己数字化。

例如,内阁在电子内阁中的工作
是绝对无纸化的。

这一发展背后的中心思想

是国家角色的转变

和信任的数字化。

想想看。

在大多数国家,人们
不信任他们的政府。

政府也不信任他们。

所有复杂的
纸质正式程序

都应该解决这个问题。

除了他们没有。

他们只会让生活变得更复杂。

我相信爱沙尼亚的经验表明
,技术可以成为

恢复信任的补救措施,

同时创建一个高效的、以

用户为中心的服务交付系统

,积极响应公民的需求。

我们并没有通过数字化
官僚机构来做到这一点。

而是通过
在一些强有力的、共同的原则上达成一致,

重新设计规则和程序,

摆脱不必要的数据收集

和任务重复

,变得公开透明。 今天

让我让您

了解一些关键的 e-Estonia
设计原则。

首先,必须保证

数据和信息的隐私和机密性。

这是通过

由国家发布

并兼容一切的强大数字身份来实现的。

事实上,每个爱沙尼亚人都有一个。

该身份
通过强大的数字签名加倍,该签名在爱沙尼亚和欧盟

都被接受、使用并具有法律约束力

当系统能够正确
、安全地识别谁在使用它时,

登录后,它将在一个工具中提供
对公民个人数据

和所有公共服务的访问

并允许通过数字签名授权任何事情

第二个原则,
也是最具变革性的原则之一,

被称为“仅一次”。

这意味着国家
不能多次要求相同的数据

也不能将其存储在多个地方。

例如,

如果您已经向人口登记处提供了
您的出生证明或结婚证明

,那么

这是唯一保存
这些数据的地方。

没有其他机构
会再次要求它。

一次是一个非常强大的规则,

因为它定义了
一个国家的数据收集的整个结构,

收集什么信息

以及谁负责维护它,

确保我们避免
数据中心化、

数据重复,

并保证它是
实际上是最新的。

这种分布式方法
也避免

了单点故障的问题。

但由于数据不能被复制

或收集不止一次,

这意味着设计
必须

始终牢记对这些信息的安全可靠访问,

以便公共机构
可以提供服务。

正是自 2001 年开始使用的名为 X-Road 的数据交换平台的作用。

就像高速公路一样,

它连接公共部门
数据库和登记处、

地方市政当局和企业,

组织一个实时、安全
和受监管的 数据交换,

每次移动后保存可审计的跟踪。

这是一个实时提要的屏幕截图,

显示了
在 X-Road 上执行的所有请求

以及
它实际促进的所有服务。

这是

公共和私营部门数据库之间所有联系的真实情况。

如您所见,

没有任何中央数据库。

保密和
隐私绝对是非常重要的。

但在数字世界中,信息的

可靠性和完整性

对于运营至关重要。

例如,

如果有人更改了
您的医疗健康记录,

比如说过敏,

在您或您的医生不知情的情况下,

治疗可能是致命的。

这就是为什么在
像爱沙尼亚这样的数字社会中,

当几乎没有纸质原件时,

几乎只有数字原件,

数据的完整性、

数据交换规则、软件组件

和日志文件至关重要。

我们
使用我们在 2007 年发明的

一种区块链形式,甚至在区块链成为事物之前

,实时检查和保证
数据的完整性。

区块链是我们的审计员,

并承诺不会对数据的访问

或数据操作未被记录。

数据所有权是
系统设计中的另一个关键原则。

您不担心世界各地
的政府、科技公司

和其他企业

声称他们收集的
关于您的数据是他们的,

通常拒绝提供
该信息的访问权限,

并且经常无法证明这些信息是如何使用

或共享的 与第三方?

我不知道,对我来说,这
似乎是一个非常令人不安的情况。

爱沙尼亚的系统

基于个人是所
收集的关于他的数据的所有者的原则,

因此拥有
了解所收集的信息

以及访问者的绝对权利。

每次警察
、医生或任何国家官员

在网上访问公民的个人信息时,

首先他们只有
在登录

到他们有权查看的信息后才能访问这些信息

其次,每次
他们发出请求时,都会

将其保存在日志文件中。

这个详细的日志文件
是国家公共服务的一部分,

并允许真正的透明度,

确保没有任何侵犯隐私的行为
不会被公民忽视。

当然,这只是

对 e-Estonia 所基于的所有设计原则的简化总结。

而现在,政府正在为人工智能

的使用做好准备,

并建立全新一代
的公共服务——

主动

服务将

根据人们可能所处的不同生活
情况无缝启动,

例如分娩、失业
或开始工作 业务。

现在,当然,

运行一个
没有纸质备份的数字社会

可能是个问题,对吧?

尽管我们相信
我们的系统是可靠的,

但我们永远不能过于谨慎,
就像我们在 2007 年经历的那样,

当时第一次网络事件发生时

,它实际上封锁
了我们的部分网络,

使得服务
无法访问数小时。

我们活了下来。

但这次活动将网络
安全置于议程的首要位置,

无论是在
加强平台还是支持平台方面。

那么如何
在一个一切都非常接近的小州备份一个全国性的系统

呢?

例如,
您可以将国家领土以外的数据副本导出

到大使馆的域外
空间。

今天,我们

拥有持有爱沙尼亚最关键
数字资产的数据大使馆,

保证运营的连续性,

保护我们的数据

,最重要的是,我们的主权。

即使在我们的领土受到物理攻击的情况下

你们中的一些人现在可能在想:

缺点在哪里?

嗯,全数字化

是行政上的,老实说,在
财务上更有效率。

Interfacing primarily
with computer systems

might create an impression
that the human factor,

elected politicians

and participating in democratic processes

is somehow less important.

还有一些

人感到受到

可能使他们的技能过时的普遍技术的威胁。

因此,不幸的是,总而言之,

在数字平台上管理一个国家

并没有使我们
免于政治权力斗争

和社会两极分化,

正如我们在上次选举中所看到的那样。

好吧,直到有人类参与。

最后一个问题。

如果一切都与位置无关,

而且我可以
从世界任何地方访问所有服务,

为什么其他人不能
利用其中一些服务,

即使他们
不在爱沙尼亚境内?

五年前,

我们启动了一项
名为 e-Residency 计划的政府初创企业

,如今该计划已
吸引了成千上万的人。

这些是
来自 136 个不同国家/地区的商人和女性,

他们
以数字方式

开展业务,在线银行业务,

并在欧盟法律框架内
通过电子爱沙尼亚平台虚拟经营公司

使用类似于我的电子身份证

和 所有这些都
来自世界任何地方。

爱沙尼亚的系统
与位置无关

且以用户为中心。

它优先考虑包容性、
开放性和可靠性。

它将安全性
和透明度置于其中心。

并将数据
交到合法所有者手中,

即他们所指的人。

不要相信我的话。

试试看。

谢谢你。

(掌声)