Why governments should prioritize wellbeing Nicola Sturgeon

Just over a mile away from here,
in Edinburgh’s Old Town,

is Panmure House.

Panmure House

was the home of the world-renowned
Scottish economist

Adam Smith.

In his important work
“The Wealth of Nations,”

Adam Smith argued,
amongst many other things,

that the measurement of a country’s wealth

was not just its gold and silver reserves.

It was the totality of the country’s
production and commerce.

I guess it was one of the earliest
descriptions of what we now know today

as gross domestic product, GDP.

Now, in the years since, of course,

that measurement
of production and commerce, GDP,

has become ever more important,

to the point that today –

and I don’t believe this
is what Adam Smith would have intended –

that it is often seen as
the most important measurement

of a country’s overall success.

And my argument today
is that it is time for that to change.

You know, what we choose to measure
as a country matters.

It really matters,
because it drives political focus,

it drives public activity.

And against that context,

I think the limitations of GDP
as a measurement of a country’s success

are all too obvious.

You know, GDP measures
the output of all of our work,

but it says nothing
about the nature of that work,

about whether that work
is worthwhile or fulfilling.

It puts a value, for example,
on illegal drug consumption,

but not on unpaid care.

It values activity in the short term

that boosts the economy,
even if that activity is hugely damaging

to the sustainability of our planet
in the longer term.

And we reflect on the past decade

of political and economic upheaval,

of growing inequalities,

and when we look ahead to the challenges
of the climate emergency,

increasing automation,

an aging population,

then I think the argument for the case
for a much broader definition

of what it means to be successful
as a country, as a society,

is compelling, and increasingly so.

And that is why Scotland, in 2018,

took the lead, took the initiative
in establishing a new network

called the Wellbeing Economy
Governments group,

bringing together as founding members

the countries of Scotland, Iceland
and New Zealand, for obvious reasons.

We’re sometimes called the SIN countries,

although our focus is very much
on the common good.

And the purpose of this group
is to challenge that focus

on the narrow measurement of GDP.

To say that, yes,
economic growth matters –

it is important –

but it is not all that is important.

And growth in GDP should not be pursued
at any or all cost.

In fact, the argument of that group

is that the goal, the objective
of economic policy

should be collective well-being:

how happy and healthy a population is,

not just how wealthy a population is.

And I’ll touch on the policy
implications of that in a moment.

But I think, particularly
in the world we live in today,

it has a deeper resonance.

You know, when we focus on well-being,

we start a conversation

that provokes profound
and fundamental questions.

What really matters to us in our lives?

What do we value
in the communities we live in?

What kind of country,
what kind of society,

do we really want to be?

And when we engage people
in those questions,

in finding the answers to those questions,

then I believe that we have
a much better chance

of addressing the alienation
and disaffection from politics

that is so prevalent in so many countries

across the developed world today.

In policy terms, this journey
for Scotland started back in 2007,

when we published what we call
our National Performance Framework,

looking at the range of indicators
that we measure ourselves against.

And those indicators
are as varied as income inequality,

the happiness of children,

access to green spaces, access to housing.

None of these are captured
in GDP statistics,

but they are all fundamental
to a healthy and a happy society.

(Applause)

And that broader approach is at the heart
of our economic strategy,

where we give equal importance
to tackling inequality

as we do to economic competitiveness.

It drives our commitment to fair work,

making sure that work
is fulfilling and well-paid.

It’s behind our decision to establish
a Just Transition Commission

to guide our path
to a carbon zero economy.

We know from economic
transformations of the past

that if we’re not careful,
there are more losers than winners.

And as we face up to the challenges
of climate change and automation,

we must not make those mistakes again.

The work we’re doing here in Scotland
is, I think, significant,

but we have much, much to learn
from other countries.

I mentioned, a moment ago,
our partner nations

in the Wellbeing network:

Iceland and New Zealand.

It’s worth noting, and I’ll leave it to you
to decide whether this is relevant or not,

that all three of these countries
are currently led by women.

(Applause)

They, too, are doing great work.

New Zealand, in 2019,
publishing its first Wellbeing Budget,

with mental health at its heart;

Iceland leading the way on equal pay,
childcare and paternity rights –

not policies that we immediately think of

when we talk about
creating a wealthy economy,

but policies that are fundamental
to a healthy economy

and a happy society.

I started with Adam Smith
and “The Wealth of Nations.”

In Adam Smith’s earlier work,
“The Theory of Moral Sentiments,”

which I think is just as important,

he made the observation
that the value of any government

is judged in proportion

to the extent that it makes
its people happy.

I think that is a good founding principle

for any group of countries
focused on promoting well-being.

None of us have all of the answers,

not even Scotland,
the birthplace of Adam Smith.

But in the world we live in today,
with growing divides and inequalities,

with disaffection and alienation,

it is more important than ever

that we ask and find the answers
to those questions

and promote a vision of society

that has well-being,
not just wealth, at its very heart.

(Applause)

You are right now in the beautiful,
sunny capital city …

(Laughter)

of the country that led the world
in the Enlightenment,

the country that helped lead the world
into the industrial age,

the country that right now
is helping to lead the world

into the low carbon age.

I want, and I’m determined,
that Scotland will also be the country

that helps change the focus of countries
and governments across the world

to put well-being at the heart
of everything that we do.

I think we owe that to this generation.

I certainly believe we owe that
to the next generation

and all those that come after us.

And if we do that, led here
from the country of the Enlightenment,

then I think we create
a better, healthier, fairer

and happier society here at home.

And we play our part in Scotland

in building a fairer,
happier world as well.

Thank you very much.

(Applause)

距离这里仅一英里多的地方,
在爱丁堡的旧城区,

是 Panmure House。

Panmure House

是世界著名的
苏格兰经济学家

亚当斯密的家。

在他的重要著作
《国富论》中,

亚当·斯密认为,
除其他外

,衡量一个国家财富的标准

不仅仅是其黄金和白银储备。

这是该国
生产和商业的总和。

我想这是
对我们今天所知

的国内生产总值(GDP)的最早描述之一。

现在,从那以后的几年里,当然,

对生产和商业的衡量,GDP,

变得越来越重要

,以至于今天

——我不相信这
是亚当·斯密的本意

——它 通常被视为

衡量一个国家整体成功的最重要指标。

我今天的论点
是,是时候改变这种情况了。

你知道,作为一个国家,我们选择衡量什么很
重要。

这真的很重要,
因为它推动了政治焦点

,推动了公共活动。

在这种情况下,

我认为 GDP
作为衡量一个国家成功的标准的局限性

是非常明显的。

你知道,GDP衡量
的是我们所有工作的产出,

但它并没有
说明这项工作的性质,也没有

说明这项工作
是否值得或有成就感。

例如,它
重视非法药物消费,

但不重视无偿护理。

它重视促进经济的短期活动


即使从长远来看,这种活动严重损害

了我们星球的可持续性

我们反思过去十年

的政治和经济动荡

、日益加剧的不平等

,当我们展望
气候紧急情况、

自动化程度提高

、人口老龄化等挑战时

,我认为有理由
支持更广泛的定义

作为一个国家,作为一个社会,成功意味着什么

是令人信服的,而且越来越如此。

这就是为什么苏格兰在 2018 年

带头,
主动建立了一个

名为福利经济
政府组织的新网络,

苏格兰、冰岛
和新西兰等国作为创始成员聚集在一起,原因显而易见。

我们有时被称为 SIN 国家,

尽管我们非常
关注共同利益。

这个小组的目的
是挑战

对 GDP 的狭隘衡量的关注。

可以这么说,是的,
经济增长

很重要——这很重要——

但这并不是最重要的。

不应不惜一切代价追求 GDP 的增长

事实上,该团体

的论点是经济政策的目标和目标

应该是集体福祉:

人口有多幸福和健康,

而不仅仅是人口有多富裕。

稍后我会谈到它的政策
含义。

但我认为,尤其是
在我们今天生活的世界里,

它有更深的共鸣。

你知道,当我们专注于幸福时,

我们会开始一场

引发深刻
而基本问题的对话。

在我们的生活中,什么对我们真正重要?

我们在生活的社区中重视什么? 我们真正想成为

什么样的国家
,什么样的社会

当我们让人们
参与这些问题

,寻找这些问题的答案时

,我相信我们
有更好的

机会解决当今

发达国家如此普遍

的对政治的疏远和不满。

在政策方面,
苏格兰的这一旅程始于 2007 年,

当时我们发布了我们所谓
的国家绩效框架,

着眼于
我们衡量自己的指标范围。

这些指标
多种多样,如收入不平等、

儿童的幸福感、

获得绿地的机会、获得住房的机会。

GDP 统计中没有包含这些

但它们都是
健康和幸福社会的基础。

(掌声

)这种更广泛的方法
是我们经济战略的核心,我们

将解决不平等问题

与经济竞争力同等重视。

它推动了我们对公平工作的承诺,

确保
工作令人满意且报酬丰厚。

我们决定建立
一个公正过渡委员会

来指导我们
走向零碳经济的道路。

我们从
过去的经济转型中

知道,如果我们不小心,
输家就会多于赢家。

当我们面对
气候变化和自动化的挑战时,

我们绝不能再犯这些错误。 我认为,

我们在苏格兰所做的工作
意义

重大,但我们要向其他国家学习的东西很多

我刚才提到了
我们

在福利网络中的伙伴国家:

冰岛和新西兰。

值得注意的是,

这三个国家
目前都由女性领导,这是否相关由你决定。

(掌声)

他们也做得很好。

新西兰于 2019 年
发布了首份

以心理健康为核心的福利预算;

冰岛在同工同酬、
育儿和陪产权方面处于领先地位——这

不是

我们在谈论
创造富裕经济时立即想到的

政策,而是
健康经济

和幸福社会的基础政策。

我从亚当·
斯密和《国富论》开始。

在我认为同样重要的亚当·斯密早期著作
《道德情操论》

中,

他观察
到任何政府的价值都是根据

它使人民幸福的程度来判断的

我认为对于任何致力于促进福祉的国家集团来说,这都是一个很好的基本原则

我们没有人知道所有的答案

,即使
是亚当·斯密的出生地苏格兰。

但在我们今天生活的世界上,
随着分歧和不平等的加剧,

不满和疏远,我们

比以往任何时候都更重要的是

,我们提出并
找到这些问题的答案,

并促进社会

的福祉愿景,
而不仅仅是 财富,在它的核心。

(掌声)

你现在在美丽、
阳光明媚的首都……

(笑声)

在启蒙运动中

引领世界的国家,帮助引领世界
进入工业时代

的国家,现在
正在帮助的国家 引领世界

进入低碳时代。

我希望并且我决心
,苏格兰也将成为

帮助改变世界各国和政府的焦点的国家,

将福祉置于
我们所做的一切的核心。

我认为我们应该归功于这一代人。

我当然相信我们应该
为下一代

和我们之后的所有人负责。

如果我们这样做,
从启蒙运动的国家到这里,

那么我认为我们在国内创造
了一个更好、更健康、更公平

和更幸福的社会。

我们也在苏格兰发挥自己的作用

,建设一个更公平、
更幸福的世界。

非常感谢你。

(掌声)