Why museums are returning cultural treasures Chip Colwell

A confession:

I am an archaeologist
and a museum curator,

but a paradoxical one.

For my museum, I collect things,

but I also return things
back to where they came from.

I love museums because
they’re social and educational,

but I’m most drawn to them
because of the magic of objects:

a one-million-year-old hand axe,

a totem pole, an impressionist painting

all take us beyond our own imaginations.

In museums, we pause to muse,
to gaze upon our human empire of things

in meditation and wonder.

I understand why US museums alone

host more than 850 million
visits each year.

Yet, in recent years, museums
have become a battleground.

Communities around the world
don’t want to see their culture

in distant institutions
which they have no control over.

They want to see their cultural treasures

repatriated, returned
to their places of origin.

Greece seeks the return
of the Parthenon Marbles,

a collection of classical sculptures
held by the British Museum.

Egypt demands antiquities from Germany.

New Zealand’s Maori want to see returned

ancestral tattooed heads
from museums everywhere.

Yet these claims pale in comparison
to those made by Native Americans.

Already, US museums have returned
more than one million artifacts

and 50,000 sets
of Native American skeletons.

To illustrate what’s at stake,
let’s start with the War Gods.

This is a wood carving

made by members
of the Zuni tribe in New Mexico.

In the 1880s, anthropologists
began to collect them

as evidence of American Indian religion.

They came to be seen as beautiful,

the precursor to the stark sculptures
of Picasso and Paul Klee,

helping to usher in
the modern art movement.

From one viewpoint, the museum
did exactly as it’s supposed to

with the War God.

It helped introduce
a little-known art form

for the world to appreciate.

But from another point of view,

the museum had committed
a terrible crime of cultural violence.

For Zunis, the War God
is not a piece of art,

it is not even a thing.

It is a being.

For Zunis, every year,

priests ritually carve new War Gods,

the Ahayu:da,

breathing life into them
in a long ceremony.

They are placed on sacred shrines

where they live to protect the Zuni people

and keep the universe in balance.

No one can own or sell a War God.

They belong only to the earth.

And so Zunis want them back from museums

so they can go to their shrine homes

to fulfill their spiritual purpose.

What is a curator to do?

I believe that the War Gods
should be returned.

This might be a startling answer.

After all, my conclusion
contradicts the refrain

of the world’s most famous archaeologist:

“That belongs in a museum!”

(Laughter)

is what Indiana Jones said,
not just to drive movie plots,

but to drive home the unquestionable good
of museums for society.

I did not come to my view easily.

I grew up in Tucson, Arizona,

and fell in love
with the Sonoran Desert’s past.

I was amazed that beneath
the city’s bland strip malls

was 12,000 years of history
just waiting to be discovered.

When I was 16 years old,
I started taking archaeology classes

and going out on digs.

A high school teacher of mine
even helped me set up my own laboratory

to study animal bones.

But in college,

I came to learn that my future career
had a dark history.

Starting in the 1860s,

Native American skeletons
became a tool for science,

collected in the thousands

to prove new theories
of social and racial hierarchies.

Native American human remains
were plundered from graves,

even taken fresh from battlefields.

When archaeologists
came across white graves,

the skeleton was often quickly reburied,

while Native bones were deposited
as specimens on museum shelves.

In the wake of war, stolen land,
boarding schools,

laws banning religion,

anthropologists collected sacred objects

in the belief that Native peoples
were on the cusp of extinction.

You can call it racism or colonialism,
but the labels don’t matter

as much as the fact
that over the last century,

Native American rights and culture
were taken from them.

In 1990, after years of Native protests,

the US government,
through the US Congress,

finally passed a law that allowed
Native Americans to reclaim

cultural items, sacred objects
and human remains from museums.

Many archaeologists were panicked.

For scientists,

it can be hard to fully grasp
how a piece of wood can be a living god

or how spirits surround bones.

And they knew that modern science,
especially with DNA,

can provide luminous insights
into the past.

As the anthropologist
Frank Norwick declared,

“We are doing important work
that benefits all of mankind.

We are not returning anything to anyone.”

As a college student,
all of this was an enigma

that was hard to decipher.

Why did Native Americans
want their heritage back

from the very places preserving it?

And how could scientists
spend their entire lives

studying dead Indians

but seem to care so little
about living ones?

I graduated but wasn’t sure
what to do next,

so I traveled.

One day, in South Africa,

I visited Nelson Mandela’s
former prison cell on Robben Island.

I had an epiphany.

Here was a man who helped
a country bridge vast divides

to seek, however imperfectly,
reconciliation.

I’m no Mandela, but I ask myself:

Could I, too, plant seeds of hope
in the ruins of the past?

In 2007, I was hired as a curator

at the Denver Museum
of Nature and Science.

Our team agreed that unlike
many other institutions,

we needed to proactively confront
the legacy of museum collecting.

We started with
the skeletons in our closet,

100 of them.

After months and then years,
we met with dozens of tribes

to figure out how to get
these remains home.

And this is hard work.

It involves negotiating
who will receive the remains,

how to respectfully transfer them,

where will they go.

Native American leaders
become undertakers,

planning funerals for dead relatives
they had never wanted unearthed.

A decade later, the Denver Museum
and our Native partners

have reburied nearly all
of the human remains in the collection.

We have returned
hundreds of sacred objects.

But I’ve come to see
that these battles are endless.

Repatriation is now a permanent feature
of the museum world.

Hundreds of tribes are waiting their turn.

There are always
more museums with more stuff.

Every catalogued War God
in an American public museum

has now been returned – 106, so far –

but there are more
beyond the reach of US law,

in private collections
and outside our borders.

In 2014, I had the chance to travel
with a respected religious leader

from the Zuni tribe
named Octavius Seowtewa

to visit five museums
in Europe with War Gods.

At the Ethnological Museum of Berlin,

we saw a War God
with a history of dubious care.

An overly enthusiastic curator
had added chicken feathers to it.

Its necklace had once been stolen.

At the Musée du quai Branly in Paris,

an official told us that the War God there
is now state property

with no provisions for repatriation.

He insisted that the War God
no longer served Zunis

but museum visitors.

He said, “We give all
of the objects to the world.”

At the British Museum,

we were warned that the Zuni case
would establish a dangerous precedent

for bigger disputes,

such as the Parthenon Marbles,
claimed by Greece.

After visiting the five museums,

Octavius returned home
to his people empty-handed.

He later told me,

“It hurts my heart to see
the Ahayu:da so far away.

They all belong together.

It’s like a family member
that’s missing from a family dinner.

When one is gone,
their strength is broken.”

I wish that my colleagues
in Europe and beyond

could see that the War Gods
do not represent the end of museums

but the chance for a new beginning.

When you walk the halls of a museum,

you’re likely just seeing
about one percent

of the total collections.

The rest is in storage.

Even after returning
500 cultural items and skeletons,

my museum still retains 99.999 percent
of its total collections.

Though we no longer have War Gods,

we have Zuni traditional pottery,

jewelry, tools, clothing and arts.

And even more precious than these objects

are the relationships that we formed
with Native Americans

through the process of repatriation.

Now, we can ask Zunis
to share their culture with us.

Not long ago, I had the chance
to visit the returned War Gods.

A shrine sits up high atop a mesa
overlooking beautiful Zuni homeland.

The shrine is enclosed
by a roofless stone building

threaded at the top with barbed wire

to ensure that they’re not stolen again.

And there they are, inside,

the Ahayu:da,

106 War Gods amid offerings
of turquoise, cornmeal, shell,

even T-shirts …

a modern gift to ancient beings.

And standing there,

I got a glimpse at the War Gods'
true purpose in the world.

And it occurred to me then

that we do not get to choose
the histories that we inherit.

Museum curators today
did not pillage ancient graves

or steal spiritual objects,

but we can accept responsibility
for correcting past mistakes.

We can help restore dignity,

hope and humanity to Native Americans,

the very people who were once
the voiceless objects of our curiosity.

And this doesn’t even require us
to fully understand others' beliefs,

only that we respect them.

Museums are temples to things past.

Now they must also become
places for living cultures.

As I turned to walk away from the shrine,

I drank in the warm summer air,

and I watched an eagle
turn lazy circles high above.

I thought of the Zunis,

whose offerings ensure
that their culture is not dead and gone

but alive and well,

and I could think of no better place
for the War Gods to be.

Thank you.

(Applause)

坦白:

我是一名考古学家
和博物馆馆长,

但自相矛盾。

对于我的博物馆,我收集东西,

但我也会把东西
送回它们原来的地方。

我喜欢博物馆,因为
它们具有社交性和教育性,

但我最喜欢它们
是因为物体的魔力:

一百万年前的手斧

、图腾柱、印象派绘画

都让我们超越了自己 想象。

在博物馆里,我们停下来沉思,在冥想和惊奇
中凝视我们人类的事物帝国

我理解为什么仅美国博物馆每年就

接待超过 8.5 亿
人次参观。

然而,近年来,博物馆
已成为战场。

世界各地的社区
不希望


他们无法控制的遥远机构中看到他们的文化。

他们希望看到他们的文化宝藏被

遣返,
回到他们的原籍地。

希腊寻求
归还大英博物馆

收藏的古典雕塑——帕台农神庙大理石

埃及向德国索要古物。

新西兰的毛利人希望从各地的博物馆中看到归还的

祖先纹身头像

然而,与美洲原住民的说法相比,这些说法相形见绌

美国博物馆已经归还
了超过 100 万件文物

和 50,000
套美洲原住民骨骼。

为了说明什么是利害攸关的,
让我们从战神开始。

是新墨西哥州祖尼部落成员制作的木雕。

1880 年代,人类学家
开始收集它们

作为美洲印第安人宗教的证据。

它们被认为是美丽的,

是毕加索和保罗克利鲜明雕塑的先驱,

有助于
引领现代艺术运动。

从某种角度来看,博物馆
完全按照它对战神所做的

一切。

它帮助介绍
了一种鲜为人知的艺术形式

,供世界欣赏。

但从另一个角度来看

,博物馆犯下
了可怕的文化暴力罪行。

对祖尼斯来说,战神
不是一件艺术品,

甚至不是一个东西。

它是一个存在。

对于祖尼斯来说,每年,

祭司都会在仪式上雕刻新的战神

,阿哈尤达,

在漫长的仪式中为他们注入活力。

他们被安置在

他们居住的神圣神殿上,以保护祖尼人

并保持宇宙的平衡。

没有人可以拥有或出售战神。

它们只属于地球。

所以祖尼人希望他们从博物馆回来,

这样他们就可以去他们的

神殿实现他们的精神目的。

策展人是做什么的?

我相信战神
应该回归。

这可能是一个令人吃惊的答案。

毕竟,我的结论

世界上最著名的考古学家的

那句话相矛盾:“这属于博物馆!”

(笑声

)印第安纳琼斯说的,
不仅仅是为了推动电影情节,

而是为了把博物馆对社会的无可置疑的好处带回家

我没有轻易得出我的看法。

我在亚利桑那州图森长大


爱上了索诺兰沙漠的过去。

令我惊讶的是,在
这座城市平淡无奇的购物中心之下,

有 12,000 年的
历史等待被发现。

当我 16 岁时,
我开始上考古课

并出去挖掘。

我的一位高中老师
甚至帮助我建立了自己的实验室

来研究动物骨骼。

但在大学里,

我开始了解到我未来的职业生涯
有一段黑暗的历史。

从 1860 年代开始,

美洲原住民的骨骼
成为科学工具,

收集了数千具

以证明
社会和种族等级制度的新理论。

美洲原住民的人类遗骸
从坟墓中被掠夺,

甚至是从战场上新鲜带走的。

当考古学家
遇到白色坟墓时

,骨骼通常会很快被重新埋葬,

而当地人的骨头则
作为标本存放在博物馆的货架上。

在战争之后,被盗的土地,
寄宿学校,

禁止宗教的法律,

人类学家收集了神圣的物品

,相信土著人民
正处于灭绝的风口浪尖。

你可以称之为种族主义或殖民主义,
但标签并不重要


因为在上个世纪,

美洲原住民的权利和文化
被剥夺了。

1990 年,经过多年的土著抗议

,美国政府
通过美国国会

终于通过了一项法律,允许
土著美国人从博物馆中收回

文化物品、圣物
和人类遗骸。

许多考古学家惊慌失措。

对于科学家来说,

很难完全掌握
一块木头如何成为活神,

或者灵魂如何围绕骨头。

他们知道,现代科学,
尤其是 DNA,

可以为过去提供光明的见解

正如人类学家
弗兰克·诺维克(Frank Norwick)所说,

“我们正在
做有益于全人类的重要工作。

我们不会向任何人回报任何东西。”

作为一名大学生,
这一切都是一个

难以破译的谜。

为什么美洲原住民
想要

从保存它的地方拿回他们的遗产?

科学家们怎么能用
毕生的时间

研究死去的印度人,

却似乎
对活着的人漠不关心呢?

我毕业了,但不知道
下一步该做什么,

所以我旅行了。

一天,在南非,

我参观了纳尔逊曼德拉
在罗本岛的前监狱牢房。

我顿悟了。

有一个人帮助
一个国家弥合了巨大的分歧,

以寻求尽管不完美的
和解。

我不是曼德拉,但我问自己:

我是否也能
在过去的废墟中播下希望的种子?

2007 年,我被聘为

丹佛自然科学博物馆
的策展人。

我们的团队一致认为,与
许多其他机构不同,

我们需要积极面对
博物馆收藏的遗产。

我们从
壁橱里的骷髅开始,其中有

100 个。

数月乃至数年之后,
我们与数十个部落会面,

以弄清楚如何将
这些遗骸带回家。

这是一项艰苦的工作。

它涉及谈判
谁将接收遗体,

如何恭敬地转移他们,

他们将去哪里。

美洲原住民领袖
成为

殡仪员,为他们从未想过出土的死去的亲人策划葬礼

十年后,丹佛博物馆
和我们的土著合作伙伴

重新埋葬
了收藏中几乎所有的人类遗骸。

我们已经归还了
数百件圣物。

但我
发现这些战斗是无止境的。

遣返现在
是博物馆界的一个永久特征。

数百个部落正在等待轮到他们。

总是有
更多的博物馆有更多的东西。

美国公共博物馆中的每一个编目战神

现在都已归还——到目前为止,有 106 个——

但还有更多
超出美国法律的范围,

在私人收藏中
和我们的国界之外。

2014 年,我有机会
与一位来自祖尼部落的受人尊敬的宗教领袖

Octavius Seowtewa

一起参观
了欧洲的五家战神博物馆。

在柏林民族学博物馆,

我们看到了
一位有着可疑照顾历史的战神。

一位过于热情的策展人
在其中添加了鸡毛。

它的项链曾经被偷过。

在巴黎的 Musée du quai Branly,

一位官员告诉我们,那里的战神
现在是国有财产

,没有任何遣返规定。

他坚持认为,战神
不再为祖尼斯人服务,

而是为博物馆参观者服务。

他说,“我们把所有
的东西都给了世界。”

在大英博物馆,

我们被警告说,祖尼案
将为更大的争端开创一个危险的先例

,例如希腊声称拥有的帕台农神庙大理石

参观完这五个博物馆后,

屋大维
空手而归。

他后来告诉我,


看到阿哈尤达这么远,我的心很痛。

他们都属于

同一个人。就像
家庭聚餐中失踪的家人一样

。一个人走了,
他们的力量就被打破了。”

我希望我
在欧洲和其他地区的同事

能够看到,战神
并不代表博物馆的终结,

而是一个新开始的机会。

当你走在博物馆的大厅里时,

你可能只会看到
大约百分之

一的藏品。

其余的都在存储中。

即使归还了
500 件文物和骷髅,

我的博物馆仍然保留了 99.999
% 的藏品。

虽然我们不再有战神,

但我们有祖尼族的传统陶器、

珠宝、工具、服装和艺术。

比这些物品更珍贵

的是我们通过遣返过程与美洲原住民建立的关系

现在,我们可以请祖尼斯
与我们分享他们的文化。

不久前,我
有幸拜访了归来的战神。

一座神社高高地矗立在台地之上,
俯瞰着美丽的祖尼家园。

神社
被一座没有屋顶的石头建筑

包围着,顶部有带刺的铁丝网,

以确保它们不会再次被盗。

里面

有 Ahayu:da、

106 位战神,供奉
着绿松石、玉米面、贝壳,

甚至是 T 恤……这

是送给古代生物的现代礼物。

站在那里,

我瞥见了战神
在这个世界上的真正目的。

然后我突然

想到,我们不能
选择我们继承的历史。

今天的博物馆馆长
没有掠夺古墓

或偷窃灵物,

但我们可以
接受纠正过去错误的责任。

我们可以帮助美洲原住民恢复尊严、

希望和人性,

这些人曾经
是我们好奇的无声对象。

这甚至不需要
我们完全理解他人的信仰,

只要我们尊重他们。

博物馆是过去事物的殿堂。

现在它们也必须
成为生活文化的场所。

当我转身离开神社时,

我在夏天温暖的空气中喝了一口

,我看着一只鹰在
高处懒洋洋地转圈。

我想到了祖尼人,

他们的奉献确保
了他们的文化不会消亡,

而是生机勃勃

,我想不出比战神更好的地方
了。

谢谢你。

(掌声)