On spaghetti sauce Malcolm Gladwell

i think i was supposed to talk about my

new book which um

is called blink and it’s about snap

judgments and first impressions and it

comes out in january and i hope

you all buy it in triplicate um

but i was thinking about this and i

realized that my um that although my new

book makes me happy and

um i think will make my mother happy

it’s not really about happiness

so i decided instead

i would talk about someone who i think

has done as much to make americans happy

um as perhaps anyone over the last uh 20

years a man who is a great personal hero

of mine um someone by the name of howard

moskowitz who is most famous for

reinventing spaghetti sauce um

howard is uh howard’s about this high

and he’s round and he’s um in his 60s

and he has

big huge glasses and

thinning gray hair and he has a kind of

wonderful exuberance and vitality and he

keeps a has a parrot and

he loves the opera and he’s a great

aficionado of of uh medieval history and

he uh by profession he’s a

psychophysicist now i should tell you

that i have no idea what um

psychophysics is although at some point

in my life i dated a girl for two years

who was getting her doctorate in

psychophysics um we should tell you

something about that relationship but

howard

as far as i know psychophysics is about

measuring things um and howard is very

interested in measuring things and he

graduated with his doctor from harvard

and he set up a little consulting shop

in um white plains new york and one of

his first clients was this is many years

ago back in the early 70s one of his

first clients was pepsi

and pepsi came to howard and they said

you know we there’s this new thing

called aspartame and we would like to

make diet pepsi we’d like you to figure

out how much aspartame we should put in

each can of diet pepsi in order to have

the perfect drink

now that sounds like an incredibly

straightforward question to answer

and that’s what howard thought because

pepsi told them look we’re working with

a band between eight and 12 percent

anything below eight percent sweetness

is not sweet enough anything above 12

percent sweetness is too sweet we want

to know what’s the sweet spot between 8

and 12.

now if i gave you this problem to do you

would all say it’s very simple what we

do is we make up a big experimental

batch of pepsi at every degree of

sweetness 8 8.1 8.2 8.3 all the way up

to 12. and we try this out with

thousands of people and we plot the

results on a curve and we take the most

popular concentration right really

simple

howard does the experiment and he gets

the data back and he plots it on a curve

and all of a sudden he realizes it’s not

a nice spell curve in fact data doesn’t

make any sense it’s a mess it’s all over

the place

now most people in that business in the

world of testing food and such are not

dismayed when the data comes back a mess

they think well you know figuring out

what people think about coal is not that

easy

you know maybe we made an error

somewhere along the way

you know let’s just make an educated

guess and they simply point and they go

for 10

right in the middle

howard is not so easily placated howard

is a man of certain degree of

intellectual standards and this was not

good enough for him and he this question

bedeviled him for years and he would

think it through and say what was wrong

why could we not make sense of this

experiment with diet pepsi

and one day he was sitting in a diner in

white plains about to go trying to dream

up some work for nescafe and suddenly

like a bolt of lightning the answer came

to him and that is that when they

analyzed the diet pepsi data they were

asking the wrong question

they were looking for the perfect pepsi

and they should have been looking for

the perfect pepsis

trust me this was an enormous revelation

this was one of the most brilliant

breakthroughs in all of food science and

howard immediately went on the road and

he would go to conferences around the

country and he would stand up and he

would say you have been looking for the

perfect pepsi

you’re wrong you should be looking for

the perfect pepsi’s

people would look at him with a blank

look and they would say what are you

talking about it’s craziness and they

would say you know move next try to get

business nobody would hire him he was

obsessed though and he talked about it

and talked about it and talked about it

howard loves the yiddish expression to a

worm in horseradish the world is

horseradish this was his horseradish

he was obsessed with it

and finally

he had a breakthrough vlasic pickles

came to him

and they said mr moskowitz dr moskowitz

we want to make the perfect pickle and

he said there is no perfect pickle there

are only perfect pickles

and he came back to them and he said you

don’t just need to improve your regular

you need to create zesty

and that’s where we got zesty

pickles then the next person came to him

and that was campbell’s soup this was

even more important in fact campbell’s

soup is where

howard made his reputation

campbell’s made prego and prego in the

early 80s was struggling

next to ragu which was the dominant

spaghetti sauce of the 70s and 80s now

in the industry i don’t know whether you

care about this or how much time i have

to go into this but

it was technically speaking this is an

aside prego is a better tomato sauce

than a ragu the quality of the tomato

paste is much better this my spice mix

is far superior it adheres to the pasta

in a much more pleasing way in fact they

would do the famous bowl test back in

the 70s with reg with ragu and prego

you’d have a plate of spaghetti and you

would

pour it on right and the ragu would all

go to the bottom and the prego would sit

on top that’s called adherence and

anyway despite the fact that they were

far superior in adherence and the

quality of their tomato paste

prego was struggling so they came to

howard and they said fix us

and howard looked at their product line

and he said what you have is a dead

potatoes

a dead tomato society

so he said this is what i want to do and

he got together with the campbell’s soup

kitchen and he made 45 varieties of

spaghetti sauce and he varied them

according to every conceivable way that

you can vary tomato sauce by sweetness

by level of garlic by tartness by

sourness by tomatoiness by visible

solids my favorite term in this

spaghetti sauce business every

conceivable way you can vary spaghetti

sauce he varied spaghetti sauce and then

he took this whole raft of 45

spaghetti sauces and he went on the road

he went to new york he went to chicago

he went to jacksonville he went to los

angeles and he brought in people by the

truckload into big halls and he sat them

down for two hours and he gave them over

the course of that two hours ten bowls

ten small bowls of pasta with a

different

spaghetti sauce on each one

and after they ate each bowl they were

at to rate from zero to a hundred how

good they thought

the spaghetti sauce was

at the end of that process after doing

it for months and months he had a

mountain of data about how the american

people feel

about spaghetti sauce and then he

analyzed the data now did he look for

the most popular brand

variety of spaghetti sauce no howard

doesn’t believe that there is such a

thing instead he looked at the data and

he said let’s see if we can group these

different all these different data

points into clusters let’s see if they

congregate around certain ideas

and sure enough if you sit down and you

analyze

these all this data on spaghetti sauce

you realize that all americans fall into

one of three groups

there are people who like their

spaghetti sauce plain

there are people who like their

spaghetti sauce spicy

and there are people who like it extra

chunky

and of those three facts the third one

was the most significant

because at the time in the early 1980s

if you went to a supermarket you would

not find extra chunky spaghetti sauce

and prego turned to howard and they said

are you telling me

that one-third of americans crave extra

chunky

spaghetti sauce and yet

no one is servicing their needs and he

said yes

and prego then went back and completely

reformulated their spaghetti sauce and

came out with a line of extra chunky

that immediately and completely took

over the spaghetti sauce business in

this country and over the next 10 years

they made 600 million dollars off their

line of extra chunky sauces

and everyone else in the industry looked

at what howard had done and they said oh

my god

we’ve been thinking all wrong and that’s

when you started to get seven different

kinds of vinegar and 14 different kinds

of of mustard and 71 different kinds of

olive oil and and then eventually even

ragu

howard and howard did the exact same

thing for ragu that he did for prego and

today if you go to the supermarket a

really good one and you look at how many

ragus there are do you know how many

they are 36

in six varieties

cheese

light

robusto

rich and hearty

old world traditional

extra chunky garden

that’s howard’s doing that is howard’s

gift to the american people now why is

that important

it is in fact enormously important i’ll

explain to you why because what howard

did is he fundamentally changed the way

the food industry thinks about making

you happy

assumption number one in the food

industry used to be

that the way to find out what people

want to eat what will make people happy

is to ask them

and for years and years and years and

years ragu and prego would have focus

groups and they would sit all you people

down and they would say what do you want

in a spaghetti sauce tell us what you

wanted spaghetti sauce and for all those

years

20 30 years through all those focus

group sessions no one ever said they

wanted extra chunky

even though at least a third of them

deep in their hearts actually did

people don’t know what they want right

as howard loves to say the mind knows

not what the tongue wants

it’s a mystery

an important critically important step

in understanding our own desires and

taste is to realize that we cannot

always explain what we want deep down

if i asked all of you for example in

this room what you wanted a coffee you

know what you’d say

every one of you would say i want a dark

rich hearty roast

so people always say when you ask them

they want a coffee what do you like dark

rich hearty roast

what percentage of you actually like a

dark rich hearty roast according to

howard some are between 25 and 27 of you

most of you like milky weak coffee

but you will never ever say to someone

who asks you what you want that i want a

milky weak coffee

so that’s

number one thing that howard did

number two thing that howard did is he

he made us realize that’s another very

critical point

he made us realize in the importance of

what

he likes to call horizontal segmentation

why is this critical it’s critical

because this is the way the food

industry thought before howard right

what were they obsessed with in the

early 80s they were obsessed with

mustard in particular they were obsessed

with the story of great boupon right

used to be there were two mustards

frenches and goldens what were they

yellow mustard what’s in yellow mustard

yellow mustard seeds turmeric and

paprika that was mustard grey poupon

came along with a dijon right

much more volatile brown mustard seed

some white wine a nose hit much more

delicate aromatics and what do they do

they put it in a little tiny glass jar

with wonderful enameled label on it made

it look french even though it’s made in

oxnard california

and instead of charging a dollar fifty

for the eight ounce

can the way the great outs bottle the

way that frenches and goldens did they

decided to charge four dollars and then

they had those ads right with the guy in

the rolls royce and he’s eating the

grape groupon the other rolls-royce

pulls up and he says do you have any

grey poupon and the whole thing after

they did that grapefruit pot takes off

he takes over the mustard business and

everyone’s take-home lesson from that

was

that the way to get to make people happy

is to give them something that is more

expensive something to aspire to right

is to make them turn their back on what

they

like think they like now and reach out

for something higher up the mustard

hierarchy

a better mustard a more expensive

mustard a mustard more sophistication

and culture and

and howard looked at that and said

that’s wrong

mustard does not exist on a hierarchy

mustard exists just like tomato sauce on

a horizontal plane there is no good

mustard or bad mustard there is no

perfect mustard or imperfect mustard

there are only different kinds of

mustards that suit different kinds of

people

he fundamentally

democratized the way we think about

taste and for that as well we owe howard

moskowitz a huge vote of thanks

third thing that howard did and perhaps

the most important

is howard confronted the notion of the

platonic dish

what do i mean by that

for the longest time in the food

industry there was a sense that there

was one way a perfect way to make a dish

you go to chapanese

they give you the red tail sashimi with

roasted pumpkin seeds in a something

something reduction they don’t give you

five options on the reduction right they

don’t say do you want the extra chunky

reduction or do you want the

no you just get the reduction why

because the chef at chapanese has a

platonic notion about red tail sashimi

this is the way it ought to be

and when that you know and she serves it

that way time and time again and if you

quarrel with her she will say you know

what you’re wrong

this is the best way it ought to be in

this restaurant now that same idea

fueled the commercial food industry as

well

they had a notion a platonic notion of

what tomato sauce was and where did that

come from it came from italy

italian tomato sauce is what it’s

blended it’s thin

the culture of tomato sauce was thin

when we talked about authentic tomato

sauce in the 1970s we talked about

italian tomato sauce we talked about the

earliest ragus which had no visible

solids right

which were thin you just put a little

bit over that and it sunk down to the

bottom of the pasta that’s what it was

and why were we attached to that because

we thought that what it took to make

people happy was to provide them with

the most culturally authentic tomato

sauce a b and b we thought that if we

gave them the culturally authentic

tomato sauce then they would embrace it

and that’s what would please the maximum

number of people

and howard and the reason we thought

that in other words people in the

cooking world were looking for cooking

universals

they were looking for one way to treat

all of us and it’s good reason for them

to be obsessed with the idea of

universals because all of science

through the 19th century and much of the

20th was obsessed with universals

psychologists medical scientists

economics economists we’re all

interested in finding out the rules that

govern the way all of us behave

but that changed right yes what is the

great revolution in science of the last

10 15 years it is the movement from the

search for universals

to the understanding of variability

now in medical science we don’t want to

know how necessarily just how cancer

works we want to know how your cancer is

different from my cancer i guess my

cancer is different from your cancer

we’re interested in genetics has opened

the door to the study of human

variability what howard moskowitz was

doing was saying this same revolution

needs to happen in the world of tomato

sauce

and for that we owe him a great vote of

thanks

i’ll give you one last illustration of

variability

and that is and i’m sorry howard not

only believed that but he took it a

second step which was to say that

when we pursue universal principles in

food

we aren’t just making an error we are

actually doing ourselves a massive

disservice

and the example he used was coffee

and coffee is

something he did a lot of work with with

nescafe

if i would ask all of you to try and

come up with a brand of coffee a type of

coffee a brew

that made all of you happy and then i

asked you to rate that coffee the

average score in this room for coffee

would be about 60 on a scale of zero to

if however you allowed me to break you

into cluster coffee clusters maybe three

or four copy clusters and i could make

coffee just for one of those for each of

those individual clusters your scores

would go from 60 to 75 or 78.

the difference between

coffee

at 60 and coffee at 78 is the difference

between coffee that makes you wince and

coffee that makes you deliriously happy

that is the final i think most beautiful

lesson of howard moskowitz that in

embracing the diversity

of human beings we will find a sure way

to true happiness

you

我想我应该谈谈我的

新书,嗯

,它叫眨眼,它是关于快速

判断和第一印象的,

它在一月份出版,我希望

你们都买一式三份,

但是我在想这个,我

意识到 我的嗯,虽然我的

新书让我快乐,而且

我认为这会让我妈妈快乐,

但这并不是真正的快乐,

所以我决定改为

谈论一个我认为

为让美国人快乐所做的事情,

嗯,也许是其他人 在过去的 20

年里,我是一个伟大的个人

英雄,一个名叫霍华德

莫斯科维茨的人,他以

重新发明意大利面酱而闻名

巨大的眼镜和

稀疏的白发,他有一种

奇妙的活力和活力,他

养着一只鹦鹉,

他喜欢歌剧,他是一个

中世纪历史的狂热爱好者,

他呃职业是

心理物理学家现在我应该告诉你

,我不知道什么是

心理物理学,尽管在我生命中的某个时刻

,我和一个

正在获得心理物理学博士学位的女孩约会了两年,

我们应该告诉你

一些关于这种关系的事情,但

霍华德

至于 我知道心理物理学是关于

测量事物的,嗯,霍华德

对测量事物非常感兴趣,他

和他的医生一起从哈佛毕业,他

在纽约白平原开了一家小咨询店,

他的第一个客户是很多

年前 早在 70 年代初期,他的

第一批客户之一是百事可乐

,百事可乐来到霍华德,他们说

你知道我们有一种

叫做阿斯巴甜的新东西,我们

想做减肥百事可乐,我们希望你

弄清楚我们应该多少阿斯巴甜 加入

每一罐减肥百事可乐,以便

获得完美的

饮品,这听起来是一个非常

简单的问题

,霍华德就是这么想的,因为

百事可乐告诉了他们 看,我们正在与

8% 到 12% 之间的乐队合作

任何低于 8% 的甜度

都不够甜 任何高于 12

% 的甜度都太甜了 我们

想知道 8 到 12 之间的甜蜜点是什么

现在如果我给你这个问题 你

会说这很简单

我们所做的就是制作大量实验

性的百事可乐,每种

甜度从 8 8.1 8.2 8.3 一直

到 12。我们与

数千人一起尝试,然后我们计划

曲线上的结果,我们采用最

流行的浓度,非常

简单,

霍华德做了实验,他得到

了数据,他把它画在曲线上

,突然间他意识到这不是

一个很好的法术曲线,事实上数据没有

没有任何意义 这是一团糟

现在到处都是 那

容易,

你知道,也许我们在你知道的某个地方犯了一个错误,

让我们做一个有根据的

猜测,他们简单地指向,他们

在中间选择 10

霍华德不是那么容易安抚霍华德

是一个具有一定

智力标准的人,而且 这

对他来说还不够好,这个问题

困扰了他多年,他会

仔细考虑并说出哪里出了问题,

为什么我们不能理解这个

用百事可乐做的实验

,有一天他坐在白色平原的一家小餐馆里

正准备去

为雀巢咖啡设计一些工作,突然间

闪电般的答案来到

了他身上,那就是当他们

分析百事可乐的饮食数据时,他们

问错了问题,

他们正在寻找完美的百事可乐

,他们应该 一直在

寻找完美的百事可乐

相信我这是一个巨大的启示

这是

所有食品科学中最辉煌的突破之一

霍华德立即上路了

他会去参加全国各地的会议

,他会站起

来说你一直在寻找

完美的百事可乐,

你错了,你应该

寻找完美的百事可乐

人们会茫然地看着他

,他们会说 你

在说什么这太疯狂了,他们

会说你知道下一步行动尝试

做生意没有人会雇用他虽然他很

着迷,但他谈论它

,谈论它,谈论它

霍华德喜欢意第绪语表达

对辣根中的蠕虫 世界是

辣根 这是他的辣根

他对它很

着迷 最后

他有一个突破性的 vlasic 泡菜

来找

他 他们说 moskowitz 先生 moskowitz 博士

我们想做完美的泡菜

他说没有完美的泡菜

只有完美 泡菜

,他回来找他们,他说你

不只是需要提高你的常规,

你需要创造刺激

,这就是我们得到刺激泡菜的地方,

然后下一个人来了 他

和那是坎贝尔的汤,这

甚至更重要,事实上坎贝尔的

汤是

霍华德成名的地方

坎贝尔在 80 年代初期制作了 prego,而 prego 在

80 年代初在 ragu 旁边苦苦挣扎,

ragu 是

70 年代和 80 年代

现在行业中占主导地位的意大利面酱 我不知道你是否

关心这个,或者我需要花多少时间

来研究这个,

但从技术上讲,这是一个

旁白 prego 是一种比 ragu 更好的番茄酱 番茄酱

的质量

要好得多这是我的香料 mix

要好得多,它

以一种更令人愉悦的方式粘附在意大利面上,事实上,他们

在 70 年代用 reg 和 ragu 和 prego 进行著名的碗测试,

你会有一盘意大利面,你

会把

它倒在右边,然后 ragu 会

全部落到底部,而 prego 会

坐在上面,这就是所谓的粘附性,

无论如何,尽管它们

的粘附性要好得多,而且

他们的番茄酱

prego 的质量正在苦苦挣扎,所以他们来了

哦,霍华德,他们说修理我们

,霍华德看着他们的产品线

,他说你有一个死

土豆

一个死番茄社会,

所以他说这就是我想做的,

他和坎贝尔的施汤厨房聚在一起

,他做了 45 种

意大利面酱,他

根据每一种可以想象的方式来改变它们,

你可以根据甜度和大蒜的程度来改变番茄酱,通过酸味来改变番茄酱,

通过可见

固体来改变我在这个意大利面酱行业中最喜欢的术语,

你可以通过各种可以想象的方式来改变意大利面

酱 他改变了意大利面酱 然后

他拿了整排 45 种

意大利面酱 然后他上路了

他去纽约 他去了芝加哥

他去了杰克逊维尔 他去了

洛杉矶 他用卡车把人们

带到了大 在大厅里,他

让他们坐了两个小时,在那两个小时里,他给了他们

十碗,

十小碗意大利

面,每碗上都有不同的意大利面酱

他们吃了他们吃的每一碗

,从零到一百打分

他们

认为意大利面条酱

在这个过程结束时有多好,经过

几个月和几个月的努力,他掌握了

大量关于美国人

对意大利面条酱的看法的数据 然后他

分析了数据,现在他是不是在

寻找最受欢迎

的意大利面酱品牌品种?霍华德

不相信有这样的

事情,而是他查看了数据,

他说让我们看看我们是否可以将这些

不同的所有这些归类 不同的数据

点成簇 让我们看看他们是否

聚集在某些想法周围

,如果你坐下来

分析

这些关于意大利面条酱的所有数据,

你会发现所有美国人都属于

三组之一,

有些人喜欢他们的

意大利面条酱原味

有些人喜欢他们的

意大利面酱辣

,有些人喜欢更

厚实

,在这三个事实中,第三个

是最重要的,

因为在 在 1980 年代初的时候,

如果你去超市,你

不会发现额外的粗意大利面酱

,prego 转向霍华德,他们

说你是不是告诉

我三分之一的美国人渴望额外的

意大利面酱,但

没有人满足他们的需求 他

说是的

,然后 prego 回去完全

重新设计了他们的意大利面酱,并

推出了一系列额外的厚实

的意大利面酱,立即完全接管了这个国家的意大利面酱业务

,在接下来的 10 年里,

他们从他们的意大利面酱中赚了 6 亿美元

超厚实的酱汁系列

,业内其他人都

看了霍华德的做法,他们说,

天哪,

我们一直在想错了,

那时你开始得到七种不同

的醋和 14 种不同

的芥末和 71 种不同种类的

橄榄油,最后甚至

ragu

howard 和 howard

为 ragu 做的事情与他为 prego 所做的完全相同,

如果你今天去 t 他的超市

非常好,你看看

有多少 ragus 你知道有多少

36 种

6 种

奶酪

清淡的

罗布斯托

丰富而丰盛的

旧世界传统

的超厚花园

这是霍华德做的 那是霍华德

现在送给美国人民的礼物 为什么

那么重要

它实际上非常重要 我会

向你解释为什么 因为霍华德

所做的是他从根本上改变

了食品行业认为让你快乐的方式 食品行业的第一

假设曾经是

找到的方法 找出人们

想吃的东西 让人们开心的

就是问他们

,多年来,

ragu 和 prego 会有焦点

小组,他们会让你们所有人

坐下来,他们会说你想要什么

意大利面 酱告诉我们你

想要什么意大利面酱,这些

年来,

20 30 年来,通过所有这些焦点

小组会议,没有人说过他们

想要额外的厚实,

即使至少 他们中有三分之一的人

在内心深处实际上

不知道他们想要什么

就像霍华德喜欢说的那样头脑

不知道舌头想要

什么这是一个谜

了解我们自己的欲望和

品味的重要关键步骤是实现

如果我在

这个房间里问你们所有人,我们不能总是解释我们内心深处想要什么,你们想要什么咖啡,你们

知道你们会说什么,你们

每个人都会说我想要一份深色

浓郁的丰盛烤肉,

所以人们总是说 当你问

他们想要一杯咖啡时,你喜欢什么浓浓的浓咖啡,

根据

霍华德的说法,你们中有多少人真正喜欢浓浓的浓咖啡,你们中的一些人在 25 到 27 岁之间,你们中的

大多数人都喜欢淡奶咖啡,

但你永远不会 对

问你想要什么的人说,我想要

一杯淡奶咖啡

,这

是霍华德做的第一件事

,霍华德做的第二件事是

他让我们意识到这是另一个非常

关键的点,

他让我们变得真实

理解

他喜欢称之为水平分割的重要性

为什么这很重要 它很重要

因为这是食品

行业在霍华德之前的想法 对

他们在 80 年代初期痴迷于什么

他们特别痴迷于芥末

伟大的 boupon 的故事

过去是有两种芥末

法式和金色它们是什么

黄色芥末什么是黄色芥末

黄色芥末种子姜黄和

辣椒粉是芥末灰色

poupon 和第戎一起出现了

更易挥发的棕色芥末种子

一些白色 葡萄酒闻起来更

细腻的芳香,他们是怎么做的,

他们把它放在一个小小的玻璃罐里,上面

有精美的珐琅标签,

让它看起来像法国人,即使它是在加利福尼亚州奥克斯纳德制造的,

而不是 8 盎司 50 美元

伟大的出局者

能否像法国人和金人那样装瓶他们

决定收取四美元然后

他们有 那些广告是在

劳斯莱斯的那个人身上,他在吃葡萄组,另一辆劳斯莱斯停了下来,他说你有没有灰色的poupon,整个事情在

他们做完之后,葡萄柚罐起飞了,

他接管了芥末业务

每个人从中学到的重要教训

,让人们快乐的方法

是给他们一些更

昂贵的东西 渴望正确的东西

是让他们放弃他们

喜欢的东西,认为他们现在喜欢

对于芥末等级更高的东西

更好的芥末 更昂贵的

芥末 芥末更复杂

文化 霍华德看着那个并

说错误的

芥末不存在等级制度

芥末的存在就像番茄酱

在水平面上没有

芥末是好是坏 没有

完美的芥末或不完美的芥末

只有不同种类的

芥末适合不同类型的

他从根本上

d 使我们思考口味的方式民主化

,为此,我们也欠霍华德

莫斯科维茨一张巨大的感谢票

,霍华德所做的第三件事,

也许最重要的

是霍华德面对柏拉图式菜肴的概念,

我的意思

是最长的时间 在食品

行业有一种感觉,

有一种方法是制作菜肴的完美方法,

你去 chapanese

他们给你红尾生鱼片和

烤南瓜籽,减少了一些

东西他们没有给你

五个选择 减少是对的,他们

没有说你想要额外的大块

减少还是你想要

不,你只是得到减少,为什么

因为 chapanese 的厨师

对红尾生鱼片有一个柏拉图式的概念,

这是它应该的方式,什么

时候 你知道,她

一次又一次地这样服务,如果你

和她吵架,她会说你

知道你错了,

这是在这家餐厅应该是最好的方式,

因为同样的想法

推动了商业 在食品行业,

他们也有一个柏拉图式的概念,

即番茄酱是什么,它

从何而来?它来自意大利?

意大利番茄酱是它的

混合物,它

很薄当我们谈到正宗的番茄酱时,番茄酱的文化很薄弱

在 1970 年代,我们谈到了

意大利番茄酱,我们谈到了

最早的抹布,它没有可见的

固体

,很薄,你只需在上面放

一点,它就会沉到

意大利面的底部,这就是它的样子

,为什么我们要 之所以如此,是因为

我们认为让

人们快乐的方法是为他们

提供最具文化意义的番茄

酱 ab 和 b 我们认为,如果我们

给他们提供文化原汁原味的

番茄酱,他们就会接受它

,这就是取悦他们的方式 最大

人数

和霍华德以及我们认为的原因

,换句话说,

烹饪界的人们正在寻找他们正在寻找的烹饪

普遍性

对待

我们所有人的方式,他们有充分的理由

沉迷于普遍性的想法,

因为

整个 19 世纪和 20 世纪的大部分时间里,所有的科学

都沉迷于普遍性

心理学家 医学家

经济学 经济学家 我们都有

兴趣找出答案

支配我们所有人行为方式的规则,

但发生了正确

变化 想

知道癌症是如何

起作用的 我们想知道你的癌症

和我的癌症有什么不同 我想我的

癌症和你的癌症不同

我们对遗传学感兴趣 遗传学打开

了研究人类

变异性的大门 霍华德·莫斯科维茨是什么

这样做是说

番茄酱的世界也需要发生同样的革命

,为此我们欠他一票

感谢,

我会给你最后一张插图 关于

可变性

,我很抱歉霍华德

不仅相信这一点,而且他采取了

第二步,也就是说,

当我们在食品中追求普遍原则时,

我们不仅仅是在犯错误,我们

实际上是在给自己做一个巨大的

伤害

和他使用的例子是咖啡

,咖啡

是他与

雀巢

咖啡合作

过的东西 然后我

让你给这杯咖啡

打分,这个房间里的咖啡平均得分

大约是 60,从 0 到

100

只为其中一个

单独的集群制作咖啡,你的分数

会从 60 到 75 或 78。60 分

的咖啡和 78 分的

咖啡之间的区别是让你畏缩的

咖啡和让你神志不清的咖啡之间的区别

我认为这是最后的快乐,我认为霍华德莫斯科维茨最美丽的一

课是,在

拥抱人类的多样性时

,我们将找到一条通往真正幸福的可靠途径