Capturing authentic narratives Michele Weldon

Every day we are bombarded on all platforms of media

with personal stories that span the continuum

from the embarrassing and the trivial

to the dire and the critical.

The foodie posting photos of every plate of lasagna he orders,

the Iranian blogger describing the shooting death

of Nedā Āghā-Soltān.

Authentic narrative is the glue that connects people,

providing a compelling reason to keep reading.

It makes the personal universal,

transcends the individual,

and makes a story timeless and humanistic.

How, as a journalist, do you ask the questions

that yield this type of narrative?

You have to know what to ask of whom.

First you need to understand that every piece of journalism

requires a trifecta of sourcing.

If you picture the reporting process as depicted by a triangle,

one side will be official sources,

another side will be overview sources,

and a third side will be unofficial sources.

All three components are necessary in every well-reported piece.

The first side has official sources.

Those are the people with titles and expertise,

who own the company; are spokespeople for the movement.

They tell you the numbers, and the answers

to how much, how many, where, when, and who.

A second side of the triangle includes overview sources:

academics, consultants, authors,

who are not directly connected as stakeholders,

but have knowledge of the big picture.

Yet it is the third side of the trifecta - unofficial sources -

who hold the power of the individual’s insight.

This is where you can find the why,

Giving consequence on the event, trend, phase, or idea

and what it means on a soul level to someone affected by it.

So how do you mine for the gems,

identifying what is compelling from what is chatter?

You ask surprising questions.

To achieve the complicated, fragile human connection,

you regard the stories of every subject as sacred.

Realize that an anecdote is oxygen

that breathes life into a grey story of exposition,

facts and data.

What the surgeon did at home the morning he operated on a woman’s brain tumor.

How it feels to dream and train for the Olympics for a lifetime.

There are times when it is important to convey information quickly,

to present bulleted facts and updates.

When a situation is urgent, when action is required now,

when you need to know where the tornado will hit,

how fast the fire is spreading, and if it will reach your home today.

But the narrative personal stories

that contribute to the buffet of journalism

are pieces that have the luxury of a slow dance of information.

It is this artful solicitation of story

that will make the journalism memorable

and will deliver the narrative bond that will connect us to each other.

每天,我们在所有媒体平台上都被各种

个人故事轰炸,这些故事跨越了

从尴尬和琐碎

到可怕和批评的连续统一体。

美食家张贴他点的每一盘千层面的照片,伊朗博

主描述

了 Nedā Āghā-Soltān 的枪杀事件。

真实的叙述是连接人们的粘合剂,

提供了一个令人信服的理由继续阅读。

它使个人具有普遍性,

超越个人

,使故事成为永恒和人文的。

作为一名记者,你如何

提出产生这种叙述的问题?

你必须知道向谁询问什么。

首先,您需要了解每篇新闻都

需要三连冠。

如果您将报告过程用三角形描绘,

一侧是官方来源,

另一侧是概览来源

,第三侧是非官方来源。

在每篇报道良好的文章中,所有三个组件都是必需的。

第一方有官方消息来源。

那些拥有公司头衔和专业知识的

人; 是运动的代言人。

他们会告诉你数字,以及数量、数量、地点、时间和对象的

答案。

三角形的第二边包括概览来源:

学者、顾问、作者,

他们作为利益相关者没有直接联系,

但对大局有了解。

然而,掌握个人洞察力的却是三重奏的第三面——非官方来源

在这里你可以找到原因,

对事件、趋势、阶段或想法产生影响

,以及它在灵魂层面对受其影响的人意味着什么。

那么,您如何挖掘宝石,

从喋喋不休的内容中识别出引人注目的内容?

你提出了令人惊讶的问题。

为了实现复杂而脆弱的人际关系,

你将每个主题的故事都视为神圣。

意识到轶事是氧气

,它为阐述、事实和数据的灰色故事注入了活力

外科医生早上在家里做了一个女人的脑瘤手术。

一生都在为奥运会梦想和训练是什么感觉。

有时,快速传达信息

、提供项目符号的事实和更新很重要。

当情况紧急时,当现在需要采取行动时,

当您需要知道龙卷风将袭击何处、

火势蔓延多快以及今天是否会到达您家时。

但是

,有助于新闻业自助餐的叙述性个人故事

是具有缓慢信息舞蹈的奢侈品。

正是这种巧妙的故事征集

将使新闻业令人难忘

,并提供将我们彼此联系起来的叙事纽带。