The optimism bias Tali Sharot

I’m gonna talk to you about optimism or

more precisely the optimism bias it’s a

cognitive illusion that we’ve been

studying in my lab for the past few

years and 80% of us have it

it’s our tendency to overestimate our

likelihood of experiencing good events

in our lives and underestimates our

likelihood of experiencing bad events so

we underestimate a likelihood of

suffering from cancer being a car

accident we overestimate our longevity

our career prospects in short we’re more

optimistic than realistic but we are

oblivious to the fact take marriage for

example in the Western world divorce

rates are about 40% that means that out

of five married couples two will end up

splitting their assets but when you ask

newlyweds about their own likelihood of

divorce they estimated at 0% and even

divorced lawyers who should really know

better hugely underestimates

their own likelihood of divorce so it

turns out that optimists are not less

likely to divorce but they are more

likely to remarried in the words of

Samuel Johnson remarriage is a tribe of

Hope over experience

so if we’re married we’re more likely to

have kids and we all think our kids will

be especially talented this by the way

is my two-year-old nephew guy and I just

want to make it absolutely clear that

he’s a really bad example of the

optimism bias because he is in fact

uniquely talented and I’m not alone out

of four British people free said that

they were optimistic about the future of

their own families that’s seventy five

percent but only thirty percent said

that they thought families in general

are doing better than a few generations

ago and this is a really important point

because we’re optimistic about ourselves

we’re optimistic about our kids we’re

optimistic about our families but we’re

not so optimistic about the guy sitting

next to us and we’re somewhat

pessimistic about the faith of our

fellow citizens and the fate of our

country but private optimism about our

own personal future remains persistent

and it doesn’t mean that we think things

will just like magically turn out okay

but rather that we have the unique

ability to make itself now I’m a

scientist I do experiments so to show

you what I mean I’m gonna do an

experiment here with you okay so I’m

gonna give you a list of abilities and

characteristics and I want you to think

for each of these abilities where you

stand relative to the rest of the

population the first one is getting

along well with others who here believes

they’re at the bottom 25%

okay that’s about ten people out of 1500

I think who believes they’re at the top

25% that’s most of us here okay now do

the same for your driving ability how

interesting are you how attractive are

you how honest are you and finally how

modest are you

so most of us put ourselves above

average on most of these abilities now

this is statistically impossible we

can’t all be better than everyone else

but if we believe we’re better than the

other guy well that means that we’re

more likely to get that promotion to

remain married because we’re more social

more interesting and it’s a global

phenomena the optimism bias has been

observed in many different countries in

Western cultures and non-western

cultures and females and males and kids

in the elderly it’s quite widespread but

the question is is it good for us so

some people say no some people say the

secret to happiness is low expectations

I think the logic is something like this

if we don’t expect greatness if we don’t

expect to find love and be healthy and

successful but we’re not gonna be

disappointed when these things don’t

happen and if we’re not disappointed

when good things don’t happen and we’re

pleasantly surprised when they do we

will be happy so it’s a very good theory

but it turns out to be wrong for three

reasons number one whatever happens

whether you succeed or you fail people

with high expectations always feel

better because how we feel when we get

dumped or when employee of the month

depends on how we interpret that event

the psychologists Margaret Marshall and

John Brown studied students with high

and low expectations and they found that

doing people with high expectations

succeeds they attribute that success to

their own traits I am a genius

therefore I got an A therefore I’ll get

an A again and again in the future

when they failed it wasn’t because they

were dumb but because the exam just

happened to be unfair next time they

will do better people with low

expectations did the opposite so when

they failed it was because they were

dumb and when they succeeded it was

because the exam just happened to be

really easy next time reality would

catch up with them so they felt worse

number two regardless of the outcome

the pure act of anticipation makes us

happy the behavioral economist Georg

Lowenstein asked students including

university to imagine getting a

passionate kiss from a celebrity any

celebrity then he said how much are you

willing to pay to get a kiss from a

celebrity if the kiss was delivered

immediately in three hours in 24 hours

in three days in one year in 10 years he

found that the students were willing to

pay the most not to get a kiss

immediately but to get a kiss in three

days they were willing to pay extra in

order to wait now they weren’t willing

to wait a year or ten years I mean no

one wants an aging celebrity but three

days seemed to be the optimum amount so

why is that well if you get the kiss now

it’s over and done with but if you get

the kiss in three days well that’s three

days of jittery anticipation the thrill

of the wait the students wanted that

time to imagine where is it gonna happen

how is it going to happen anticipation

made them happy this is by the way why

people prefer Friday to Sunday it’s a

really curious fact because Friday is a

day of work and Sunday is a day of

pleasure so you would assume that people

will prefer Sunday but they don’t it’s

not because they really really like

being in the office and they can’t stand

strolling in the park or having a lazy

brunch we know that because when you ask

people about their ultimate favorite day

of the week

surprise surprise Saturday comes in at

first then Friday

then Sunday people prefer Friday because

Friday brings with it the anticipation

of the weekend ahead all the plans that

you have on Sunday the only thing you

can look forward to is the workweek

so optimists are people who expect more

kisses in their future more strolls in

the park and that anticipation enhances

their well-being in fact without the

optimism bias we would all be slightly

depressed people with mild depression

they don’t have a

when they look into the future they’re

actually more realistic than people

healthy individuals but individuals with

severe depression they have a

pessimistic bias so they tend to expect

the future to be worse than it ends up

being so optimism changes subjective

reality the way we expect the world to

be changes the way we see it but it also

changes objective reality it acts as a

self-fulfilling prophecy and that is a

third reason why lowering your

expectations will not make you happy

controlled experiments have shown that

optimism is not only related to success

it leads to success optimism leads to

success in academia and sports and

politics and maybe the most surprising

benefit of optimism is health if we

expect the future to be bright stress

and anxiety are reduced so oh no

optimism has lots of benefits but the

question that was really confusing to me

was how do we maintain optimism in the

face of reality as a neuroscientist this

was especially confusing because

according to all the theories out there

when your expectations are not met you

should lter them but this is not what we

find we asked people to come into our

lab in order to try and figure out what

was going on we asked them to estimate

their likelihood of experiencing

different terrible events in their lives

so for example what is your likelihood

of suffering from cancer and then we

told them the average likelihood of

someone like them to suffer these

misfortunes so cancer for example is

about 30% and then we ask them again how

likely are you to suffer from cancer

what we wanted to know was whether

people will take the information that we

gave them to change their beliefs and

indeed they did but mostly when the

information we gave them was better than

what they expected so for example if

someone said my likelihood of suffering

from cancer is about 50% and we said

hey good news the average likelihood is

only 30% the next time around they would

say well maybe my likelihood is about

35% so they learned quickly and

efficiently but if someone started off

saying my average likelihood of

suffering from cancer is about 10% and

we said hey bad news

the average likelihood is about 30% the

next time around they would say yep

still think it’s about 11%

so it’s not that they didn’t learn at

all they did but much much less than

when we gave them positive information

about the future and it’s not that they

didn’t remember the numbers that we gave

them everyone remembers that the average

likelihood of cancer is about Freddy

percent and the average likelihood of

divorce is about 40 percent but they

didn’t think that those numbers were

related to them what this means is

that’s warning science such as these may

only have limited impact

yes smoking kills but mostly kills the

other guy what I wanted to know was what

was going on inside the human brain that

prevented us from taking these warning

signs personally but at the same time

when we hear that the housing market is

hopeful and we think oh my house is

definitely gonna double in price to try

and figure that out I ask the

participants in the experiment to lie in

a brain imaging scanner it looks like

this and using a method called

functional MRI we were able to identify

regions in the brain that were

responding to positive information one

of these regions is called the left

inferior frontal gyrus so if someone

said my likelihood of suffering from

cancer is 50% and we said hey good news

average likely it is 30% the left

inferior frontal gyrus would respond

fiercely and it didn’t matter if you are

an extreme optimist and mild optimist or

slightly pessimistic everyone’s left

inferior frontal gyrus was functioning

perfectly well whether you’re Barack

Obama or Woody Allen on the other side

of the brain the right inferior frontal

gyrus was responding to bad news and

here’s the thing it wasn’t doing a very

good job the more optimistic he were the

less likely this region was to respond

to unexpected negative information and

if your brain is failing at integrating

bad news about the future you will

constantly leave your rose tinted

spectacles on so we wanted to know could

we change this

could we alter people’s optimism bias by

interfering with the brain activity in

these regions and there’s a way for us

to do that this is my collaborator Rio

de Cali and what he’s doing is he’s

passing a small magnetic poles for the

skull of the participant in our study

into their inferior frontal gyrus and by

doing that he’s interfering with the

activity of this brain region for about

half an hour after that everything goes

back to normal I assure you

so let’s see what happens first of all

I’m gonna show you the average amount of

bias that we see so if I was to test all

of you now this is the amount that you

would learn more from good news relative

to bad news

now we interfere with the region that we

found to integrate negative information

in this task and the optimism bias grew

even larger we made people more biased

in the way that they process information

then we interfered with the brain region

that we found to integrate good news in

this task and the optimism bias

disappeared we were quite amazed by

these results because we were able to

eliminate a deep-rooted bias in humans

and at this point we because we stopped

and we asked ourselves would we want to

shatter the optimism illusion into tiny

little bits if if we could do that would

we want to take people’s optimism bias

away well I’ve already told you about

all of the benefits of the optimism bias

which probably makes you want to hold on

to it for dear life but there are of

course pitfalls and it will be really

foolish of us to ignore them take for

example this email I received from a

firefighter here in California

he says fatality investigations for

firefighters often include we didn’t

think the fire was going to do that even

when all the available information was

there to make safe decisions this

captain is going to use our findings on

the optimism bias to try to explain to

the firefighters why they think the way

they do to make them acutely aware of

this very optimistic bias in humans so

unrealistic optimism can lead to risky

behavior to financial collapse to faulty

planning the British government for

example has acknowledged that the

optimism bias can make individuals more

likely to underestimate the cost and

during

of projects so they have adjusted the

2012 Olympic budget for the optimism

bias my friend who’s getting married in

a few weeks has done the same for his

wedding budget and by the way when I

asked him about his own likelihood of

divorce he said he was quite sure it was

zero percent so what we would really

like to do is we would like to protect

ourselves from the dangers of optimism

but at the same time remain hopeful

benefiting from the many fruits of

optimism and I believe there’s a way for

us to do that the key here really is

knowledge we’re not born with an innate

understanding of our biases these have

to be identified by scientific

investigation but the good news is that

becoming aware of the optimism bias does

not shatter the illusion it’s like

visual illusions in which understanding

them does not make them go away and this

is good because it means we should be

able to strike a balance to come up with

plans and rules to protect ourselves

from unrealistic optimism but at the

same time remain hopeful

I think this cartoon portrays it nicely

because if you’re one of these

pessimistic penguins up there who just

does not believe they can fly you will

certainly never will because to make any

kind of progress we need to be able to

imagine a different reality and then we

need to believe that that reality is

possible but if you are an extreme

optimistic penguin who just jumps down

blindly and hoping for the best you

might find yourself in a bit of a mess

when you hit the ground but if you’re an

optimistic penguin who believes it can

fly but then adjust a parachute to your

back just in case things didn’t work out

exactly as you plans

you will soar like an eagle even if

you’re just a penguin thank you

我要和你谈谈乐观,或者

更准确地说是乐观偏见,这是一种

认知错觉,

过去几年我们一直在我的实验室研究

,80% 的人都有

这种错觉

我们生活中发生的事件,低估了我们

经历不良事件

的可能性,所以我们低估了

患癌症的可能性是一场车祸

例如,在西方世界,

离婚率约为 40%,这

意味着五对已婚夫妇中有两对最终会

分割他们的资产,但当你问

新婚夫妇自己离婚的可能性时,

他们估计为 0%,甚至

离婚的律师应该真的 知道

更好的人极大地低估了

他们自己离婚的可能性,所以

事实证明,乐观主义者离婚的可能性并不低

,但他们更

倾向于 用

塞缪尔·约翰逊的话来说很可能再婚再婚是一个

希望而不是经验的部落,

所以如果我们结婚了,我们更有可能

生孩子,我们都认为我们的孩子

会特别有才华,顺便说一句,这

是我的两年 -老侄子,我

只想明确表示,

他是乐观偏见的一个非常糟糕的例子,

因为他实际上是

独一无二的,而且在四个英国人中,我并不是唯一一个

对未来表示乐观的人 在

他们自己的家庭中有 75

% 但只有 30% 的人

表示他们认为家庭总体

上比几代人

前做得更好,这是非常重要的一点,

因为我们对自己

很乐观 我们对孩子很乐观

对我们的家庭感到乐观,但我们对

坐在我们旁边的那个人并不那么乐观

,我们对同胞的信仰

和国家的命运有些悲观,

但私下对 o 您

自己的个人未来仍然持久

,这并不意味着我们认为事情

会像神奇般地变好

,而是我们现在拥有独特的

自我创造能力我是一名

科学家我做实验是为了向

你展示我的意思 我会

在这里和你一起做一个实验,所以

我会给你一份能力和特征的清单

,我希望你考虑一下

相对于其他

人口的每一种能力,第一个获得的

与其他认为

自己处于最底层 25% 的人相处得

很好,这大约是 1500 人中的 10 个人

有趣的是你有多有吸引力

你有多诚实最后你有多

谦虚

所以我们

大多数人在这些能力的大多数方面都高于平均水平现在

这在统计上是不可能的 我们

不可能都比其他人都更好

但如果我们相信我们 ‘回覆 比

其他人更好,这意味着我们

更有可能获得晋升以

保持婚姻,因为我们更善于社交,

更有趣,这是一种全球

现象,

西方文化和非西方文化的许多不同国家都观察到了乐观偏见。 西方

文化和女性、男性和

老年人中的孩子,这很普遍,

但问题是它对我们有好处,所以

有些人说没有,有些人说

幸福的秘诀是低期望,

如果我们不这样做,我认为逻辑是这样的 如果我们不

期望找到爱情、健康和

成功,就不要期望伟大,但是

当这些事情没有

发生时,我们不会失望,如果我们没有失望,

当好事没有发生时

当他们这样做时,我们

会感到惊喜,所以这是一个非常好的理论,

但事实证明它是错误的,

原因有三个 第一,

无论你成功还是失败

,高期望的人总是觉得

更好 呃,因为当我们被抛弃或当月最佳员工时,我们的感受

取决于我们如何解释该事件。

心理学家玛格丽特·马歇尔和

约翰·布朗研究了

期望值高和低的学生,他们发现

与期望值高的人打交道会

成功,他们将这种成功归因于 根据

他们自己的特点,我是个天才,

所以我得了A,所以将来我会

一次又一次地得A,

当他们不及格时,不是因为

他们愚蠢,而是因为

下次考试碰巧不公平

做得更好但期望值低的

人则相反,所以当

他们失败时是因为他们很

愚蠢,而当他们成功时是

因为考试恰好

很容易,下次现实会

赶上他们,所以他们觉得第二名更糟,

不管

结果 纯粹的期待行为让我们

快乐 行为经济学家 Georg

Lowenstein 让包括大学在内的

学生想象得到一个

热情的吻 来自名人 任何

名人 然后他说

如果

在 3 小时内 24 小时内 24 小时

内 3 天 1 年 10 年 10 年 10 年 他

发现学生愿意,你愿意花多少钱从名人那里得到一个吻

付出最多 不是

马上得到一个吻 而是在三天内得到一个吻

他们愿意支付额外的费用

来等待 现在他们

不愿意等待一年或十年 我的意思是没有

人想要一个上了年纪的名人 但是

三天似乎是最合适的时间,所以

为什么如果你现在得到吻

就结束了,但如果你

在三天内得到吻,那是

三天的紧张期待

,学生们想要那个时候等待的快感

想象它会在哪里发生

它将如何发生

假设 e 人们

会更喜欢星期天,但他们不喜欢这

不是因为他们真的很

喜欢待在办公室里,而且他们无法忍受

在公园里散步或吃一顿懒洋洋的

早午餐,我们知道这是因为当你问

人们他们最喜欢的一天时

一周的

惊喜 周六

首先出现,然后是周五,

然后是周日 人们更喜欢周五,因为

周五带来了

对周末的期待

周日的所有计划 你唯一

可以期待的就是工作周,

所以乐观主义者是 期待

未来有更多亲吻的人 更多地

在公园里散步,这种期待会增强

他们的幸福感 事实上,如果没有

乐观偏见,我们都会

有轻微的抑郁症 患有轻微抑郁症的人

他们没有

展望未来时 '

实际上比健康的人更现实,

但患有

严重抑郁症的人有

悲观的偏见,所以他们倾向于

预期未来会更糟 乐观主义最终

会改变主观

现实,改变我们对世界的期望,

改变我们看待世界的方式,但它也

改变了客观现实,它充当了一个

自我实现的预言,这是

降低

期望不会影响的第三个原因 让你快乐

对照实验表明,

乐观不仅与成功有关,

它会带来成功 乐观会

在学术界、体育和政治上取得

成功 减少了,所以哦,没有

乐观有很多好处,但

真正让我困惑的问题是

,作为神经科学家,我们如何在面对现实时保持乐观,

这尤其令人困惑,因为

根据所有理论,

当你的期望不是时 遇到你

应该过滤他们,但这不是我们

发现的,我们要求人们进入我们的

实验室以试图弄清楚发生了

什么 接下来,我们要求他们估计

他们在生活中经历不同可怕事件

的可能性,例如,您

患癌症的可能性有多大,然后我们

告诉他们

像他们这样的人遭受这些

不幸的平均可能性,例如,癌症

大约是 30%,然后我们再次问他们

你患癌症的可能性有

多大我们想知道人们是否

会接受我们

给他们的信息来改变他们的信念,

他们确实这样做了,但主要是当

我们给他们的信息更好时 超出

他们的预期,例如,如果

有人说我

患癌症的可能性约为 50%,我们说,

嘿,好消息,平均可能性

只有 30%,下次他们会

说好吧,也许我的可能性约为

35%,所以他们 快速

有效地学习,但如果有人开始

说我

患癌症的平均可能性约为 10%,

我们说,坏

消息,平均可能性 ood 大约是 30%

下一次他们会说是的,

仍然认为大约是 11%,

所以这并不是说他们根本没有学习,

而是比

我们给他们关于未来的积极信息时要少得多,

不是那样的 他们

不记得我们给他们的数字

每个人都记得

患癌症的平均可能性大约是 Freddy

百分比,平均

离婚可能性大约是 40% 但

他们认为这些数字

与他们无关这意味着什么

诸如此类的警告科学可能

只会产生有限的影响,

是的,吸烟会杀死人,但主要会杀死

另一个

人 听说房地产市场

充满希望,我们认为哦,我的房子

肯定会涨一倍的价格来

尝试弄清楚我让

实验的参与者

躺在大脑成像 sca 中 看起来像

这样,使用一种称为

功能性核磁共振的方法,我们能够识别

出大脑中

对积极信息做出反应的区域,

其中一个区域被称为左

额下回,所以如果有人

说我患

癌症的可能性是 50 %,我们说,嘿,好消息

平均值可能是 30%

巴拉克奥巴马或伍迪艾伦

在大脑的另一侧右侧额

下回正在对坏消息做出反应,

这就是它做得不是很好的事情,

他越乐观,

这个区域就越不可能做出反应

对意想不到的负面信息,

如果你的大脑无法整合

关于未来的坏消息,你

会不断地戴上你的玫瑰色

眼镜 所以我们想知道我们是否可以

改变这

一点 我们是否可以通过

干扰这些区域的大脑活动来改变

人们的乐观偏见 我们有

办法做到这一点 这是我的合作者 Rio

de Cali 他正在做的是他正在

通过一个小磁

我们研究参与者的头骨的极点

进入他们的额下回,通过

这样做,他干扰

了这个大脑区域的活动大约

半小时,之后一切

恢复正常,我向你保证,

让我们先看看会发生什么

我要向你们展示

我们看到的平均偏差量,所以如果我现在要测试你们所有人

,这

就是你们从好消息中学

到的比坏消息更多的量,

现在我们干扰了我们发现的区域

为了

在这项任务中整合负面信息,乐观偏见变得

更大,我们

让人们在处理信息的方式上更加偏见,

然后我们干预

了我们发现的大脑区域 在

这项任务中分享好消息,乐观偏见

消失了我们对这些结果感到非常惊讶,

因为我们能够

消除人类根深蒂固的偏见,

而在这一点上,我们停下来

问自己是否要

打破乐观

如果我们能做到这一点,

我们会希望把人们的乐观

偏见很好地消除吗?我已经告诉过你

乐观偏见的所有好处,

这可能会让你想

为了宝贵的生命而坚持下去,但是

当然有陷阱

,我们忽略它们真的很愚蠢,

例如我从加利福尼亚的一名消防员那里收到的这封电子邮件

他说对

消防员的死亡调查通常包括我们

认为火灾不会那样做

当所有可用信息都在

那里做出安全决定时,这位

船长将利用我们

对乐观偏见的发现来尝试

向消防员解释他们为什么

这么想 他们这样做是为了让他们敏锐地意识到

人类的这种非常乐观的偏见,因此

不切实际的乐观会导致冒险

行为,导致金融崩溃,甚至是错误的

计划,例如英国政府

已经承认,

乐观偏见会使个人更有

可能低估成本,并且

项目,所以他们调整了

2012 年奥运会的预算,因为

我的朋友几周后就要结婚

了,他的

婚礼预算也做了同样的调整,顺便说一句,当我

问他自己离婚的可能性时,

他说他很 肯定是

百分之零,所以我们真正

想做的是保护

自己免受乐观的危险,

但同时仍然希望

从乐观的许多果实中受益

,我相信我们有

办法做到这一点 这里的关键真的是

知识,我们不是天生就

对我们的偏见有天生的理解,这些必须

通过科学研究来识别,

但是 好消息是,

意识到乐观偏见并

不会打破这种错觉,就像

视觉错觉一样,理解

它们不会让它们消失,

这很好,因为这意味着我们应该

能够取得平衡以

制定计划和 规则来保护自己

免受不切实际的乐观主义的影响,但

同时保持希望

一种进步,我们需要能够

想象一个不同的现实,然后我们

需要相信这个现实是

可能的,但如果你是一只极度

乐观的企鹅,只是

盲目地跳下并希望最好,你

可能会发现自己有点

当你撞到地面时会一团糟,但如果你是一只

乐观的企鹅,相信它可以

飞,然后将降落伞调整到你的

背上,以防万一事情不

准确 按照你的计划

,即使你只是一只企鹅,你也会像鹰一样翱翔,

谢谢