The mysterious science of pain Joshua W. Pate

In 1995, the British Medical Journal

published an astonishing report
about a 29-year-old builder.

He accidentally jumped
onto a 15-centimeter nail,

which pierced straight through
his steel-toed boot.

He was in such agonizing pain that even
the smallest movement was unbearable.

But when the doctors took off his boot,
they faced a surprising sight:

the nail had never touched
his foot at all.

For hundreds of years,

scientists thought that pain was
a direct response to damage.

By that logic, the more severe an injury
is, the more pain it should cause.

But as we’ve learned more about
the science of pain,

we’ve discovered that pain and tissue
damage don’t always go hand in hand,

even when the body’s threat signaling
mechanisms are fully functioning.

We’re capable of experiencing severe pain
out of proportion to an actual injury,

and even pain without any injury,

like the builder, or the well-documented
cases of male partners

of pregnant women experiencing pain
during the pregnancy or labor.

What’s going on here?

There are actually two phenomena at play:

the experience of pain, and a biological
process called nociception.

Nociception is part of the nervous
system’s protective response

to harmful or potentially harmful stimuli.

Sensors in specialized nerve endings

detect mechanical, thermal,
and chemical threats.

If enough sensors are activated,

electrical signals shoot up the nerve
to the spine and on to the brain.

The brain weighs the importance
of these signals

and produces pain if it decides
the body needs protection.

Typically, pain helps the body
avoid further injury or damage.

But there are a whole set of factors
besides nociception

that can influence the experience of pain—
and make pain less useful.

First, there are biological factors that
amplify nociceptive signals to the brain.

If nerve fibers are activated repeatedly,

the brain may decide they need
to be more sensitive

to adequately protect the body
from threats.

More stress sensors can be
added to nerve fibers

until they become so sensitive that
even light touches to the skin

spark intense electrical signals.

In other cases,

nerves adapt to send signals more
efficiently, amplifying the message.

These forms of amplification

are most common in people experiencing
chronic pain,

which is defined as pain lasting
more than 3 months.

When the nervous system is nudged
into an ongoing state of high alert,

pain can outlast physical injury.

This creates a vicious cycle in which
the longer pain persists,

the more difficult it becomes to reverse.

Psychological factors clearly
play a role in pain too,

potentially by influencing nociception and
by influencing the brain directly.

A person’s emotional state, memories,

beliefs about pain and expectations
about treatment

can all influence how much
pain they experience.

In one study,

children who reported believing they
had no control over pain

actually experienced more intense pain

than those who believed they
had some control.

Features of the environment matter too:

In one experiment,

volunteers with a cold rod placed on
the back of their hand

reported feeling more pain when they were
shown a red light than a blue one,

even though the rod was the same
temperature each time.

Finally, social factors like the
availability of family support

can affect perception of pain.

All of this means that a multi-pronged
approach to pain treatment

that includes pain specialists, physical
therapists, clinical psychologists, nurses

and other healthcare professionals
is often most effective.

We’re only beginning to uncover the
mechanisms behind the experience of pain,

but there are some promising
areas of research.

Until recently,

we thought the glial cells surrounding
neurons were just support structures,

but now we know they have a huge role
in influencing nociception.

Studies have shown that disabling certain
brain circuits in the amygdala

can eliminate pain in rats.

And genetic testing in people with
rare disorders

that prevent them from feeling pain

have pinpointed several other
possible targets for drugs

and perhaps eventually gene therapy.

1995 年,英国医学杂志

发表了一篇
关于一名 29 岁建筑工人的惊人报道。

他不小心
跳到了一根 15 厘米长的钉子上,钉子

直接刺穿了
他的钢头靴。

他承受着如此巨大的痛苦,即使
是最小的动作也难以忍受。

但是当医生们脱下他的靴子时,
他们看到了一个令人惊讶的景象

:钉子根本没有碰到
他的脚。

数百年来,

科学家认为疼痛是
对损伤的直接反应。

按照这个逻辑,伤害越严重
,它应该引起的疼痛就越大。

但随着我们
对疼痛科学的了解越来越多,

我们发现疼痛和组织
损伤并不总是齐头并进,

即使身体的威胁信号
机制充分发挥作用。

我们能够经历
与实际伤害不成比例的剧烈

疼痛,甚至是没有任何伤害的疼痛,

比如建造者,或者有据可查

的孕妇男性伴侣在怀孕或分娩期间经历疼痛的案例

这里发生了什么?

实际上有两种现象在起作用:

疼痛的体验和
称为伤害感受的生物过程。

伤害感受是神经
系统

对有害或潜在有害刺激的保护性反应的一部分。

专门的神经末梢传感器

检测机械、热
和化学威胁。

如果有足够多的传感器被激活,

电信号就会从神经
上射到脊柱,然后再传到大脑。

大脑权衡
这些信号的重要性,

如果它决定身体需要保护,就会产生疼痛

通常,疼痛有助于身体
避免进一步的伤害或损害。

但是
除了伤害感受之外

,还有一整套因素可以影响疼痛的体验——
并使疼痛变得不那么有用。

首先,有一些生物因素会
放大对大脑的伤害感受信号。

如果神经纤维被反复激活

,大脑可能会决定它们
需要更加敏感,

以充分保护身体
免受威胁。

更多的压力传感器可以
添加到神经纤维中,

直到它们变得如此敏感,以至于
即使是对皮肤的轻微接触也会

引发强烈的电信号。

在其他情况下,

神经适应更有效地发送信号
,放大信息。

这些形式的

放大最常见于经历
慢性疼痛的人,慢性

疼痛被定义为持续
超过 3 个月的疼痛。

当神经系统
进入持续的高度警戒状态时,

疼痛会比身体伤害更持久。

这就形成了一个恶性循环,
疼痛持续的时间越长,

就越难逆转。

心理因素显然
也在疼痛中发挥作用,

可能通过影响伤害感受和
直接影响大脑。

一个人的情绪状态、记忆、

对疼痛的信念和
对治疗的期望

都会影响
他们经历的疼痛程度。

在一项研究中,

自称认为
自己无法控制疼痛的孩子

实际上

比那些认为自己可以
控制疼痛的孩子经历了更剧烈的疼痛。

环境的特征也很重要:

在一项实验中,

将一根冷棒
放在手背上的志愿者

报告说,当他们
看到红灯而不是蓝灯时,他们

感到更痛苦,即使每次冰棒的
温度相同。

最后,家庭支持等社会因素

会影响对疼痛的感知。

所有这一切都意味着,

包括疼痛专家、物理
治疗师、临床心理学家、护士

和其他医疗保健专业人员在内的多管齐下的疼痛治疗
方法通常是最有效的。

我们才刚刚开始
揭示疼痛体验背后的机制,

但仍有一些很有前景
的研究领域。

直到最近,

我们还认为神经元周围的神经胶质细胞
只是支持结构,

但现在我们知道它们在影响伤害感受方面发挥着巨大作用

研究表明,禁用
杏仁核中的某些大脑回路

可以消除大鼠的疼痛。

对患有罕见疾病的人进行基因检测以

防止他们感到疼痛,

已经确定了其他几个
可能的药物目标

,也许最终是基因治疗。