New ways to understand life in a pandemic Aaron Maniam

here to share his take on policy poetry

and pandemic response please welcome

Aaron Mannion I tell him Aaron it is so

good to see you and I want to leave you

the floor and get you to set out your

take for us so please take it away Helen

thank you so much and it’s really good

to be here with you it is late in

Singapore as you said but it’s a

wonderfully worthwhile way to be with a

wonderful community I think I wanted to

start by making this connection between

poetry and policy that you you mentioned

all my life I’ve been trying to find

ways to connect the two of them because

they’re both such key parts of what I do

and over time what I’ve realized is

actually the core tool of the poet the

metaphor or the image is actually a key

part of so much of our lives including

public policy if we look at what’s going

on now in our responses to the the

corona virus or Cove it 19 pandemic one

of the most dominant images out there is

the images of war we talk about

flattening the curve we talk about

defeating the virus now we ask ourselves

what happens when you have to put people

on quarantine those are all images of

war when you think about it just as in

the rest of our lives when we talk about

defeating an argument that really is the

idea that argumentation is war and it’s

an interesting one because the war

metaphor while very useful for imposing

public order and making sure that people

understand the gravity of the situation

is still limited somehow because I find

myself asking who is the victor in this

war who do we have to defeat what is the

enemy here we might need to live with

covert 19 we might not be able to defeat

it entirely and what does that long-term

future that long-term life with covert

actually look like I find myself

wondering about questions like where is

the Solidarity the collective investment

in our future here because that’s not

always

in the idea of a war so then I got to

asking myself well maybe there are other

images other metaphors out there there

are better ways to characterize what

exactly this whole situation we find

ourselves in is like maybe covert 19 is

a journey because a lot of people do ask

us right we ask ourselves at least where

are we going

what will the post kovat wall or world

with Corbett look like what is this

destination that we’re all headed to but

even there I think there are limitations

with that metaphor because there’s

something sentimentality to the idea of

a journey and I think we need to be a

little bit more hard-nosed with

ourselves when we try to figure out what

exactly this future with covitz

might look like some of us are also

traveling in very different types of

vehicles or very different kinds of

containers if we are indeed on a journey

some of us are in very very high-class

luxury liners others are in boats others

are in overall flotilla some of us are

in much less sturdy dinghies and those I

think highlight some of the inequalities

that we face which the pure image of a

journey the pure metaphor of a journey

doesn’t actually capture so I got to

thinking well maybe we can think about

Corbett 19 as an ecology right maybe we

can use the ideas and images of biology

to actually work a little bit harder at

understanding what’s going on and here I

think we start to find more interesting

material to deal with because if we

accept that we’re dealing with an

ecology then we start to realize that

yes this virus is a critical part of

nature it is a natural phenomenon and

it’s something that we need to learn to

deal with we realize that there are

unequal effects out there and these

unequal effects actually are also being

seen in the different responses that

people have to the whole situation that

they’re in

because some of us are dealing with

covert 19s trauma some of us are

experiencing it in extremely severe

terms while others well–perhaps

experiencing it in less severe terms not

even as trauma but potentially it’s as I

put a potentially quite negative

positive experience

you know something that allows them to

actually enjoy

time to exercise time with family time

to be an introvert and these are all

things that we need to try and really

figure out because it’s these

inequalities that I think are some of

the most interesting aspects of the

current crisis that we find ourselves in

and I think the singaporean example is

one that is trying to flesh out these

images we’re trying to deal with the

warlike aspects of Corbett 19 but we’re

also trying to deal with the ecological

aspects the fact that there are these

different these different effects these

differentiated consequences for the

different people who are experiencing

this that’s why in one of our responses

in addition to doing things like in very

detailed testing and contact tracing

we’ve also put out four different

supplementary budgets in the in the year

to actually support people who are

experiencing the most severe of these

differentiated effects we’ve put out a

huge amount of money a total of 93

billion Singapore dollars which is about

66 billion u.s. dollars to support

people in job preservation to support

people in training to support people who

are interested in acquiring digital

skills so that they might actually be

able to ride the wave of this

transformation in a way that enables

them to be much more positively placed

to deal in with a world that has kovat

much more endemic in it there are also I

think much more interesting images in

the ecological idea when we start

thinking about the collective effects

the collective efforts that are out

there in the covert 19 responses because

what we find is that we need to

experience kovat as a situation where

they can be mutual care where

communities come together to support one

another in the kinds of responses that

they need to put out to the situation

that they find themselves in we have

ways of being connected to each other as

we have in nature that are not always

obvious to an individual person

operating in an atomized way now of

course the ecological metaphor is also

limited it’s not complete because what

I’ve realized as I examine more and more

of what’s going on in both my country

and other parts of the world is that we

capture the interdependencies

these interpersonal interconnections but

we don’t always capture relationships

when we look at these metaphors and what

I’ve realized is any individual metaphor

is always going to be limited the war

metaphor is limited the journey metaphor

is limited and the ecological metaphor

while it is more rich than the other two

is also limited because it doesn’t

always capture some of the deep

community elements the mutual

responsibilities that we can have which

are nonetheless part of the overall

responses that we’re trying to make in

Singapore so my parting initial shot at

least in this conversation is to say

that the poet in me recognizes the roles

that metaphors can have in our responses

to Cove in nineteen the policymaker

recognizes that each of these metaphors

is useful for highlighting particular

aspects of our situation but each of the

metaphors is also limited and what we

need is therefore a complex mix of

metaphors to allow us to highlight the

individual parts of the problem and the

challenges that we face which are most

interesting for us and it’s only when we

put these metaphors together the

metaphor of war of journey of ecology

and potentially others as well that

we’ve get to a really sophisticated

understanding of the kind of situation

that were in I’ll leave it at that for

now and see what sorts of questions we

get and I’d love to see how we can

deepen the metaphors that we explore in

the rest of this conversation Erin thank

you so much and sorry that I

unexpectedly disappeared halfway through

as you were talking but I wanted you to

have the whole screen I promise I was

listening to every word okay so I’m

going to just right away in with a

couple of questions as they’re as we

collect them in the end from the

comments thread and the first thing I

want to ask you is to talk a bit more

about four budgets because four budgets

seems like a lot to roll out and I

wonder like how different is that from

your kind of normal way normal means of

business and how did you how did you

sustain the change that these budgets

then meant for kind of your work it just

seems like you’re describing and

Manas that many governments would kind

of aspire to longingly but not

necessarily know how to implement and

roll out at such speed so I wonder if

you can talk a little bit more about

that no Helen that’s a really

interesting question because in each

normal fiscal year we’d have one budget

and and I say we because this is the

result of a highly complex machinery

there’s a metaphor as well a highly

complex doublin government machinery

that’s in play all the time and in a

normal year we’d have one budget but

this year given the deep exigencies that

we found the community facing we thought

it was necessary to supplement that with

enough support for different groups of

people to actually be able to ride some

of the waves of the Aquatica the

pandemic and the crisis effects that it

has engendered first of all what we try

to support is individual citizens right

to make sure that there is a base level

of support given to each person in

Singapore and that has ranged between

$300 to $600 in in one of the waves of

the budget and there’s a renewal in some

cases for those who need it the most

we’ve also tried to support enterprises

companies of different sizes to make

sure that they can engage in job

preservation because what we found is we

need to preserve jobs in every crisis

we’ve been in before whether it’s the

global financial crisis or the SARS

crisis in the early 2000s all the

economic crises following 9/11 what we

found was in each case especially when

you’re a small globally open economy

like ours you need to have the ability

and the wherewithal to respond really

quickly when there is recovery or

transformation eventually to a new

equilibrium and in that case we need to

make sure that jobs are preserved

because if the jobs are let go of then

actually companies will find it much

more difficult to ride the waves of

recovery later on so job preservation

has been key and we’ve encouraged people

to go on training to go on internships

or trainee ships that allow the

companies to actually preserve jobs in a

way that actually encourages the

upskilling

of the human capital whom they work with

and that works for them we’ve also tried

to make sure that we support the least

digitally connected the elderly in some

cases families with lower incomes and in

a lot of cases you know people who

manage some of our micro and small

enterprises because the interest to go

digital for them is

often the least well-developed and in

those cases we put out a huge amount of

money to actually support the

transformation that they can make to go

digital for two reasons one its publicly

safer in terms of health when we don’t

have to deal with cash and we can deal

with as many contactless modes of

payment as possible and a wonderful

ancillary benefit that comes from that

is the fact that these digital

transformations actually stand people in

very good stead later on we’ve been

benefitting from the fact that in the

past we’ve put away a fair amount of

reserves that have allowed us to dip

into these so that we can actually fund

some of this in all these different

budgetary measures but probably the most

important thing that I wanted to say

here is that the focus on each of the

budgetary measures is not just relief

you’ll notice from everything I’ve

described that the focus is much more

about long-term transformation it’s

about putting people on a footing

whereby in the long term as they use the

wherewithal of these reserves and

accumulated savings over generations we

can actually use that to put ourselves

in a better position for transformation

in the future Wow

that truly is building back better Wow

I’m curious you know you recognize the

limitations of one single metaphor but

I’m also curious with in your

conversations how much of this how much

of this like these ideas around

metaphors and the power of language or

mean explicit and how much is this you

kind of tracking this and kind of

observing how people are speaking and

then kind of adjusting and adapting to

see how you can shift the conversations

or is this something that is explicitly

part of the discussions it’s an

interesting question I think depends on

who we talk to you know there are some

folks I think for whom the idea of

metaphor based thinking comes much more

naturally you know and and they’re there

often you know in people who are engaged

in writing of some kind very often you

know those who are involved in helping

to draft speeches although we find that

many of our leaders work on their

speeches themselves because they want to

exercise a huge amount of ownership and

investment in it I think the the

language that’s there it has always been

a recognition that the language is key

and that language actually shapes the

over

discourse so people need not call it a

metaphor based understanding but I think

there is that knowledge that when we

look through different frames or through

different lenses if you like that’s an

equally powerful way of framing this we

actually can see different things and

people have understood that when you

frame things from the point of view of a

machine then what you will see are the

more mechanistic interactions with it

within it and I’ve used the image of the

government machinery earlier on we’ve

heard the metaphors of war a great deal

but in some of the speeches that we’ve

heard from our leaders what we’ve also

noticed is you know there’s images of

how they tell us you will not walk alone

when you fall you will be helped you

will be assisted to get up again and now

that’s the metaphor of the journey

coming out right through again and and I

think what we found is this mix of meta

first does come quite naturally to a

whole range of different members of the

leadership and when we put that together

we get a fairly rich composite picture

of the kind of situation we’re in I

would add we don’t want to abandon the

war metaphor entirely because while I

like I said there is no clear enemy

there is no sense of what victory might

actually look like we do want I think

the the huge sense of urgency that comes

with a war metaphor then that can drive

and rally a society well that I think

can actually be quite powerful and so

there are benefits from the war metaphor

that we find useful as well particularly

when you marry with the ecological

metaphor that I mentioned earlier I’m

gonna bring on tea because I know that

questions are pouring in and while I

will happily talk to you all day I’m

gonna see what she has to ask you can

tell Meredith how are you it’s um it’s

really interesting to hear you can use

language in this way and talk about

metaphor and we do have questions from

our community because they are so

engaged and would love to ask you a few

things the first one I’d like to ask is

from Patrick Adams and his question is

the most resilient ecology in nature for

example is usually the most diverse how

do we use this moment to make sure

diversity is part of the world’s

recovery yes that’s such a powerful

question right there you know and we’re

seeing situations where you know the

identity diversity

in so many societies is being really

stretched thin right and then where we

need to actually strengthen it a lot

more I think one aspect of it comes from

recognizing that each of us whatever you

know the sophistication of our mental

models and assumptions is never going to

have a monopoly on truth we need to

recognize that we have to value the

diversity of that other’s brief and what

that means it’s recognizing both their

identity diversity is right their

ethnicity the languages that they speak

all of which will frame their thinking

in certain ways but also recognizing

their cognitive diversity the importance

of people coming from disciplines like

engineering and history and public

health and economics and law and all

contributing to a bunch of richer

understanding in totality of the sort of

situations we’re in

I think even that very basic step of

making sure that the teams we operate in

are s diverse as possible making sure

that in terms of gender in terms of

discipline in terms of age that they are

spread wide that is already a wonderful

help because it means that in each of

the areas where we exercise influence we

are exercising some of that diversity

and in each of us does that then

actually the macro effects become much

more powerfully felt because there will

be a natural diversity in that direction

as well thanks Patrick for that question

thank you for that very insightful

answer we also have a question from a

Vida Lani and she’s really looking at

the next generation what’s the role

responsibilities do young people have

and the new normal which should our

message be to them you know I suppose

one has to define young at some point as

well right and there is the definition

that the UN adopts you know below 45

there’s a young at heart as well which I

think is just as important a form of

both cognitive and identity diversity

and and we do want to make sure that

their their views are brought in

particularly I think in two ways one is

there can be an inherent newness in some

of the ideas that young people breathe

because they will be have been exposed

to different things folks out there who

are less than 25 at the moment years of

age they’re going to have been born

digital natives in a lot of ways you

know be the concepts of

using smartphones is unalienable eaters

and they may have been before so I think

the ideas that they bring in can be much

more embracing of some of the new

benefits that technology can bring to us

while at the same time recognizing that

there are pitfalls in technology as well

and making sure that we try and govern

or manage or regulate those as best we

can

there’s a second aspect about youth that

I think is important because it’s not

just the ideas themselves but a certain

experimental mindset that can be brought

to the approaches that they employ I

think we’re going to be living in a

world where tried and tested approaches

right looking at precedents of the past

are going to be much less effective than

before we’re going to find that the

effects of precedents wears thin and

what we need therefore is a much more

agile more iterative approach whereby we

prototype tests fast fail fast and then

respond to the feedback that comes to us

from the ecosystem that we’re testing

those ideas in and I I do find that

there are a lot of young people very

willing to run these experiments are

only young people there are some folks

you know who are of a certain vintage

who are also willing to experiment but

the preponderance of experimentation I

find does happen with younger people and

that ability to sit in the messiness of

iteration and the messiness of being

perpetual drafts and what in progress

that I think will be one of the most

powerful things we can have because even

now right none of us knows what this new

reality is going to look like we don’t

know if we will have a post kovat world

or a coded endemic world or a world

where kovat becomes part of the ambient

noise of our public health situations

each of those things requires different

sets of responses and to be in a space

like there is now to learn and

experiment and try different things as

we prepare for those futures that I

think is what experimentation will

actually help us to do yes I think I’m

gonna jump in Oh

Jory I’m going to jump in because the

questions that there are so many of them

and so I’m just going to jump in with

one from one of our TED fellows

presenter can you further the ecology

metaphor more in an

ecological landscape it seems the poor

are treated like ants and the rich are

Birds how do you see class playing out

the new ecological metaphor yeah

prasanta thank you for that question

because that’s exactly what I meant when

I said that the metaphors are invariably

limited I a pure ecology has a food

chain in it right you talked about ants

and birds you know there is a hierarchy

of predators that we pray and pray that

consume vegetation that is a natural

part of the life rhythms of an ecology

but I don’t think it’s something that we

should accept as a natural part of the

life rhythms of a society and a

community because we live in community

we don’t live in a pure ecology so while

the ecological metaphor is very useful

the bit that I find it doesn’t quite

quite capture which I alluded to earlier

is the fact that there are moral

relationships between us there is a

sense in which each of us can be

responsible for others and that’s I

think what has prompted some of the the

more interpersonal society based actions

that Singapore’s responses have had you

know when we talk about downloading

contact tracing apps this is not just

about doing it for a technical reason

it’s doing it because it helps keep

other people safe

and keep ourselves safe when we talk

about people staying at home this is not

just a self-imposed isolation that is a

technical thing to do to visit to defeat

a virus it’s done because it helps

everybody to be safe and one of our tag

lines is that the safety of all depends

on the contributions of everyone right

that kind of moral relationship I think

doesn’t get captured in an ecological

metaphor so we need to use the metaphors

for what they tell us but bear in mind

that each metaphor is going to be have a

certain amount of limitation as well

and we have a question from lower floor

Colcord and it’s about your home your

home country does Singapore have any

learnings for America I think that’s a

very timely question about mitigating

this differential covent impacts on

minority populations

you know Singapore has a deeply

multicultural situation and sets of

circumstances we are one of the most

religiously and culturally diverse

countries in the world we have a 75%

Chinese population we’ve got about 25%

of the population who are comprised of

Malays and Indians and numerous other

minority groups we’ve got many new

minorities coming in as well I would add

though that a lot of Singapore situation

comes from the fact that we’re very

densely and urbanely packed right we

were a very very urban City based type

setting and that means that the way in

which we deal with diversity is not

going to be the same as a much larger

entity like the u.s. which has multiple

types of urban spaces right the big

cities and the conurbations but also

smaller towns what I would say has been

really critical for us is to make sure

that there is a sense of unity in

diversity that there is an overall

commitment to that’s what I would call a

civic nationalism a set of common values

like multiculturalism and meritocracy in

what we do but what’s also been

important is to recognize that within

there it’s important for cultures to

have space to express themselves right

there is freedom of religion this

freedom of expression for history and

culture and traditions that different

communities have and what we found is

that within that kind of broad unity and

diversity structure what we then see is

situations where you have the diversity

is kind of playing with one another I

come from a family that’s deeply mixed

actually my dad is half ethnic Tamil

half Eurasian because he’s got some

Portuguese descent if you go back to the

1500s my mother is part Pakistani part

Malay and has a smattering of Chinese

from my great-grandmother who was

adopted when she was a baby by a Muslim

family so I’ve had a long time to kind

of make peace and not just make peace

but you learn to celebrate my in

eternal diversities and what we find is

that lately there are more and more

people like me in Singapore there are

more intermarriages and even where there

aren’t intermarriages there are so many

more friendships because of the common

spaces that we’ve created to allow for

those different communities to interact

with each other we actually have a

system whereby we don’t allow the

creation of enclaves and ghettos in

public housing which the state

subsidizes there is a mix in each of the

the overall apartment blocks that that

exists we make sure that everybody goes

to schools that are diverse there are a

small number of Chinese medium schools

but even within them there are a good

number actually an increasing number of

non ethnic Chinese students who go there

because they want to learn Mandarin well

we make sure that when people do

national military service which is our

internal system of conscription you know

that people are mixed as well and there

was an image that a friend of mine wants

to put forward to me where he said that

after a certain number of weeks in the

Sun everybody is brown right and then

everybody and this color of the skin

starts to matter a lot less and so it’s

these common spaces that become so

critical I think to allow for the sorts

of interaction that allow for the

diversities that that are so critical

for a good ecology and a rigorous

ecology to exist but those diversity

–zz don’t exist by chance they need to

be managed through deliberate policy and

a deliberate maintenance of those common

spaces the latest challenge of course is

the online common space right to make

sure that within those digital spaces we

also preserve the sanctity and the

protection for minority groups and we

try to make sure that ethnic minorities

that there in terms of gender we do make

sure that the right protections are in

place that cyberbullying doesn’t exist

and that we allow for the fact that if

there are nefarious things going on

there we have means to respond as well

put those together I think what you get

is an overall ecosystem or an ecology

within which the diversity can function

and we can actually start to then

transcend the ecological metaphor and

make sure that the moral relationships

amongst these communities is also well

established so I think we have time for

one more comment one more question and

this one is from

Stephen Patrick I was living on an

island frame your metaphors that is such

a great question now you know Singapore

is an interesting conundrum because we

are a state we’re a city we’re an island

and we’re all of those things at the

same time which means that unlike many

other cities which have the benefits of

large national hinterlands in many

cities which don’t have to take care of

their national security we do actually

have to look at that and I would say

that actually it’s not just the island

that’s important but it’s the Pfister

interconnection amongst the city-state

an island that really does affect how we

approach a lot of our policymaking and

kind of approach being Singaporean

because the city the city aspect of what

we do is where we know we need to be

open to the world we need to be open to

ideas and to people because that’s how

cities thrive right they don’t thrive by

locking themselves up and turning

themselves into fortresses but because

we’re a state we also need to be

cultivating a certain sense of national

identity we want to send some mutual

solidarity and commitment to nationalism

in terms of values like I said and as an

island we need to be constantly open to

a whole range of influences from outside

the most obvious of those is physical

right the transshipment goods that we

have always been a hub for were the

first ways in which our island nature

actually helped us to get in connection

and get in touch with the rest of the

world because we are at the connection

of multiple trade routes in the world

and we were very convenient entrepot

port for a good number of shipping

powers but the modern equivalent of that

is to be a hub and an entrepreneur

for the digital space right for the

virtual space for ideas and for people

to come as well and that’s why we will

find that if you come to Singapore the

expatriate community is actually fairly

large there are people who found that

even they come here adjusting is a lot

easier because there are ready

populations who have already assimilated

other members who were different from

them but that within that there is a

certain amount of not just tolerance but

also celebration of the overall

diversity that people face so when you

put the

overall kind of cosmopolitanism of a

city with the deep nationalism of state

and the general openness to ideas people

and flows of goods that an island has

that I think is often what makes up the

core psyche of a Singaporean I think

your next job may be with the tourist

board I’m not sure sound Aaron thank you

so very much what a pleasure it was to

speak with you that was so interesting

and you are the best thank you so very

much

thank you for having me Helen thanks so

much this was well worth staying out

past midnight for oh thank you

在这里分享他对政策诗

和大流行应对的看法 请欢迎

Aaron Mannion 我告诉他 Aaron 很

高兴见到你,我想请

你发言,让你为我们提出你的

看法,所以请把它拿走 海伦

非常感谢,和你在一起真是

太好了。正如你所说,在新加坡已经很晚了,

但这

是与一个美妙的社区在一起的一种非常有价值的方式

我想我想

首先在

诗歌和政策之间建立联系,你你

提到我一生都在尝试

找到将两者联系起来的方法,因为

它们都是我所做工作的关键部分

,随着时间的推移,我意识到

实际上是诗人的核心工具

隐喻或 图像实际上

是我们生活中的一个关键部分,包括

公共政策,如果我们看看

现在在我们对

冠状病毒或 Cove it 19 大流行的反应中发生了什么

,其中最主要

的图像之一就是战争图像,我们 谈论

扁平化 我们现在谈论的

战胜病毒的曲线 我们问自己

,当你不得不将人们隔离时会发生什么

当你想到它时,这些都是战争的画面,就像在

我们的余生中,当我们谈论

打败一个真正的论点时一样

争论是战争的想法,这是

一个有趣的想法,因为战争

隐喻虽然对于实施

公共秩序和确保人们

理解局势的严重性非常有用,但在

某种程度上仍然受到限制,因为我发现

自己在问谁是这场战争的胜利者

我们必须打败谁 在这里的敌人是什么

我们可能需要隐蔽地生活

19 我们可能无法完全击败

它 长期的

未来和隐蔽的长期生活

实际上看起来像我发现自己

想知道 关于

诸如团结工会对我们未来的集体投资之类的问题

,因为这并不

总是

在战争的概念中,所以我不得不

问自己,也许有很多 她的

图像 其他隐喻

有更好的方法来描述

我们发现自己所处的整个

情况就像隐蔽 19 是

一段旅程,因为很多人确实问

我们是对的 我们至少问自己

我们

要去哪里 与 Corbett 一起发布 kovat wall 或 world

看起来像

我们都要去的这个目的地,但

即使在那里,我认为这个比喻也有局限性

,因为旅程

的想法有点多愁善感

,我认为我们需要有点

当我们试图弄清楚

covitz 的未来究竟会是什么样子时,

我们对自己更加顽固一点 在非常非常高级的

豪华班轮中 其他人在船上 其他

人在整体船队中 我们中的一些人

在不那么坚固的小艇中,我

认为那些突出了一些不平等

我们所面临的那些旅程的纯粹形象,

旅程的纯粹隐喻

实际上并没有捕捉到,所以我必须

好好思考也许我们可以将

Corbett 19 视为生态学,也许我们

可以使用生物学的想法和形象

来 实际上要更加努力地

了解正在发生的事情,在这里我

认为我们开始找到更多有趣的

材料来处理,因为如果我们

接受我们正在处理

生态系统,那么我们就会开始意识到,

是的,这种病毒是一个关键部分

这是一种自然现象

,是我们需要学会

处理的事情,我们意识到存在

不平等的影响,这些

不平等的影响实际上也

体现在

人们对他们所处的整体情况的不同反应中

重新参与

是因为我们中的一些人正在处理

隐蔽的 19 岁

创伤 妈,但可能是因为我

提出了一种可能非常消极的

积极体验,

你知道一些事情可以让他们

真正享受

时间与家人一起锻炼

时间成为一个内向的人,这些

都是我们需要尝试并真正

弄清楚的事情,因为它是这些

我认为不平等是我们发现自己

所处的当前危机的一些最有趣的方面

,我认为新加坡的例子

是试图充实这些

图像,我们试图处理

Corbett 19 的好战方面,但是 我们

还试图处理生态

方面的事实,即存在这些

不同的这些不同的影响,这些

不同的后果对

正在经历这种情况的不同人来说,

这就是为什么在我们的一个回应

中,除了做一些非常

详细的测试和 联系追踪

我们还在一年中推出了四项不同的

补充预算,

以实际支持经验

丰富的人 考虑到这些差异化影响中最严重的一个,

我们投入了

巨额资金,总计 930

亿新加坡元,约合

660 亿美元。 美元 支持

人们保住工作

支持人们接受培训 支持

有兴趣获得数字

技能的人 使他们能够真正

驾驭这种

转变的浪潮 使

他们能够更积极

地应对 在一个科瓦特在其中流行得多的世界中,

当我们开始考虑集体影响时,我认为生态理念中还有更有趣的图像

隐蔽的 19 响应中存在的集体努力,因为

我们发现的是 我们需要将

kovat 体验为一种

他们可以相互关心的情况,

社区聚集在一起,

他们需要对他们发现自己所处的情况

做出反应时相互支持,我们有

方法与每个人建立联系 其他就像

我们在自然界中所拥有的,对于

以原子化方式运作的个人来说并不总是显而易见的,

当然生态元 hor 也是

有限的,它并不完整,因为

当我越来越多

地审视我的国家和世界其他地区正在发生的事情时,我

意识到,我们

捕捉到了这些人际关系的相互依赖关系,

我们并不总是捕捉到关系

当我们看到这些隐喻时,

我意识到任何个人隐喻

总是有限的,战争

隐喻是有限的,旅程隐喻

是有限的,生态隐喻

虽然比其他两个更丰富,但

也是有限的,因为它 并不

总能捕捉到一些深层的

社区元素

,我们可以承担的共同责任,这

仍然

是我们试图在新加坡做出的整体回应的一部分,

所以我

至少在这次谈话中的分手最初的镜头是

说 我心中的诗人认识

到隐喻在我们对

十九世纪科夫的回应中可以发挥的作用决策者

认识到这些隐喻中的每一个

都是有用的 ul 用于突出

我们情况的特定方面,但每个

隐喻也是有限的,

因此我们需要的是复杂的隐喻组合,

以使我们能够突出问题的

各个部分以及

我们面临的挑战,这些

对我们来说最有趣 只有当我们

将这些隐喻

与生态之旅战争的隐喻

以及可能的其他隐喻结合在一起时,

我们才能对

当时的情况

有一个非常复杂的理解,我将暂时搁置

它 看看我们得到了什么样的问题

,我很想看看我们如何

加深我们

在接下来的谈话中探索的隐喻 艾琳非常感谢

你,很抱歉我

在你说话的时候突然消失了,但我想要你

拥有整个屏幕我保证我正在

听每一个字没问题所以我

会马上提出

几个问题,因为它们是我们

最终从通讯中收集的

nts 线程,我想问的第一

件事是多

谈谈四项预算,因为四项预算

似乎需要推出很多,我

想知道这与

您的正常业务方式有何不同,

以及如何 你是如何

维持这些预算对你的工作所意味着的改变的,这

看起来就像你描述的

那样,许多

政府渴望但

不一定知道如何

以这样的速度实施和推出 所以我想知道

你能不能多谈谈

海伦,这是一个非常

有趣的问题,因为在每个

正常的财政年度,我们都会有一个预算

,我说我们是因为这

是一个高度复杂的机器的结果,

有一个比喻 还有一个高度

复杂的都柏林政府机构

,它一直在发挥作用,在

正常的一年里,我们会有一个预算,但

今年考虑到我们发现社区面临的严重紧急情况,

我们认为

这是 有必要通过对不同人群的足够支持来补充这一点,

以便真正能够驾驭

Aquatica 的一些浪潮,

大流行和它所产生的危机影响

首先我们

试图支持的是公民个人

有权确保 新加坡每个人都有基本

的支持水平,

在其中一波预算中,支持水平在 300 美元到 600 美元之间,

在某些

情况下,对于最需要的人,

我们也尝试过更新 支持

不同规模的企业,

确保他们能够进行就业

保全,因为我们发现我们

需要在我们之前经历过的每一次危机中保住工作,

无论是

全球金融危机还是

2000年代初的非典危机

9/11 之后的所有经济危机我们

发现在每种情况下都是如此,尤其是当

您是像我们这样的小型全球开放经济体时,

您需要有能力

和资金来应对

当复苏或

转变最终达到新的

平衡时真的很快,在这种情况下,我们需要

确保保留工作岗位,

因为如果放弃工作岗位,那么

实际上公司将发现

要驾驭复苏的浪潮要困难得多

后来,保住

工作成为关键,我们鼓励人们

接受培训,去实习

或实习船,让

公司真正保住工作

,从而真正鼓励与

他们一起工作的人力资本的技能提升

, 这对他们有用

对他们来说,数字化

通常是最不发达的,在

这种情况下,我们投入了大量

资金来实际支持

他们可以进行的转型 走向

数字化有两个原因,一是

当我们不必处理现金时,它在公共健康方面更安全,

而且我们可以

处理尽可能多的非接触式支付方式,

由此带来的一个美妙的辅助好处

是事实 这些数字化

转型实际上让人们

受益匪浅 这在所有这些不同的

预算措施中,但可能

我想在这里说的最重要的事情

是,对每项

预算措施的关注不仅仅是缓解

你会从我所

描述的一切中注意到的重点更多

的是 长期转型它是

关于让人们站稳脚跟

,从长远来看,当他们使用

这些储备的资金和

几代人积累的储蓄时,我们

实际上可以用它来把我们的 自己

在未来的转型中处于更好的位置

,真的正在重建得更好哇

我很好奇你知道你认识到

一个隐喻的局限性,但

我也很好奇在你的

谈话中这个有

多少这个有多少 喜欢这些关于

隐喻和语言的力量或

明确的意思的想法,这有多少,

你跟踪这个,

观察人们的说话方式,

然后调整和适应,

看看你如何改变对话,

或者这是什么东西 这显然

是讨论的一部分,这是一个

有趣的问题,我认为这取决于

我们与谁交谈

从事某种写作的

人中,你经常认识那些参与

帮助起草演讲的人,尽管我们发现我们的

许多领导者都致力于他们的

自己发表演讲,因为他们想对其

进行大量的所有权和

投资

基于理解,但我认为

有这样的知识,当

我们通过不同的框架或

不同的镜头看时,如果你愿意,这是一种

同样强大的取景方式,我们

实际上可以看到不同的东西,

人们已经明白,当你

从角度取景时 从机器的角度来看,

您将看到的是

与它内部的更机械的交互

,我早些时候使用了政府机器的形象,

我们已经

听到很多战争的隐喻,

但在我们的一些演讲中 '

从我们的领导那里听到我们还

注意到的是,你

知道他们如何告诉我们,

当你跌倒时,你不会独自行走,你会得到帮助 你

将被协助再次起床,现在

就是旅程再次出现的隐喻,我

认为我们发现这种元数据的组合

确实很自然地出现

在领导层的所有不同成员

以及何时 我们把它们放在一起,

我们得到了我们所处那种情况的相当丰富的综合画面

我们确实想要什么样的胜利我

认为战争隐喻带来的巨大紧迫感

可以

很好地推动和团结一个社会

我们发现它也很有用,特别是

当你与

我之前提到的生态隐喻结婚时,我

会带上茶,因为我知道

问题正在涌入,虽然我

会很高兴地和你交谈一整天,但我

要去 不知道她要问什么 你可以

告诉 Meredith 你好吗 嗯

听到你能

以这种方式使用语言并谈论

隐喻真的很有趣 我们确实有来自

我们社区的问题因为他们非常

投入并且很想问 你有几

件事我想问的第一件事

是帕特里克亚当斯他的问题

是自然界中最具弹性的生态

例如通常是最多样化的

我们如何利用这一刻确保

多样性成为世界

复苏的一部分 是的,这是一个如此强大的

问题,你知道,我们

看到你知道

在这么多社会中的身份多样性真的

被拉得很薄,然后我们

需要更多地加强它

我认为它的一个方面 来自于

认识到我们每个人无论你

知道我们的心理

模型和假设的复杂性永远

不会垄断真理我们需要

认识到我们必须重视

潜水员 对方的简要说明以及

这意味着什么 承认他们的

身份多样性是正确的 他们的

种族 他们说的

所有语言都会以某些方式构建他们的思维

,但也要认识到

他们的认知多样性

来自工程学等学科的人的重要性

历史、

公共卫生、经济和法律,所有这些都

有助于对我们所处的总体情况有更丰富的

理解,

我认为即使是

确保我们运营的团队

尽可能多样化的最基本步骤

确保就性别

而言 就年龄而言 纪律方面

广泛传播 这已经是一个很好的

帮助 因为这意味着

在我们行使影响力的每个领域中,我们

正在行使一些多样性,

并且在我们每个人中 那么

实际上宏观效应会变得

更加强烈,因为

在那个方向上会有自然的多样性

也感谢帕特里克的这个问题

谢谢你非常有见地的

回答我们还有一个来自维达拉尼的问题

,她真的在关注

下一代

年轻人的职责是什么

以及我们

应该向他们传达的新常态 你知道我想

人们必须在某个时候定义年轻

也是正确的,联合国采用的定义

你知道,45岁以下

还有一颗年轻的心,我

认为

这与认知和身份多样性同样重要

而且我们确实希望确保

他们的观点得到特别采纳,

我认为有两种方式,一种

是年轻人所呼吸的一些想法可能具有内在的新鲜感,

因为他们将接触

到不同的东西 那些

年龄不到 25

岁的人 他们将

在很多方面成为数字原住民

使用智能手机的概念是不可剥夺的 ers

和他们可能以前是这样的,所以我

认为他们带来的想法可以

更多地拥抱

技术可以给我们带来的一些新好处,

同时认识

到技术也存在缺陷

并确保 我们尽我们所能尝试和管理

或管理或规范这些

关于青年的第二个方面

我认为很重要,因为

不仅是想法本身,

而且可以将某种实验性思维引入

到他们采用的方法中我

认为我们 “我们将生活在这样一个

世界中,在这个世界中,

正确看待过去先例

的尝试和测试方法将比以前有效得多

,我们将发现

先例的影响逐渐减弱,

因此我们需要的是 更

敏捷,更迭代的方法,我们的

原型测试快速失败,然后

响应

来自生态系统的反馈,我们正在测试

这些想法,然后我会做 发现

有很多年轻人非常

愿意进行这些实验

只是年轻人 有一些

你认识的某些年份的

人也愿意进行实验,但

我发现实验的优势

确实发生在年轻人身上,并且

在迭代的混乱和永久草稿的混乱中坐下来的能力

以及正在进行的

事情,我认为这将是我们可以拥有的最

强大的东西之一,因为即使是

现在,我们也没有人知道这个新

现实会是什么样子 就像我们不

知道我们是否会有一个后科瓦特世界

或一个编码的地方性世界,或者一个

科瓦特成为

我们公共卫生状况的环境噪音一部分的世界

就像现在要学习和

实验并尝试不同的事情,因为

我们为那些我

认为实验

实际上会帮助我们做的未来做准备是的,我想我

会 ump in Oh

Jory 我要加入,因为

问题太多了

,所以我只想

和我们的一位 TED 研究员

演讲者一起加入,你能在生态学中更深入地介绍生态学的隐喻吗?

景观似乎穷人

被视为蚂蚁,富人被视为

鸟类你如何看待班级

发挥新的生态隐喻是的

prasanta谢谢你的问题

因为这正是

我说隐喻总是

有限时的意思我是一个纯粹的人 生态学中有一条

食物链,对,你谈到了蚂蚁

和鸟类,你知道有一个等级

的捕食者,我们祈祷并祈祷

消耗植被,这

是生态学生活节奏的自然组成部分,

但我不认为这是什么 我们

应该接受作为社会和社区生活节奏的自然组成部分,

因为我们生活在社区中,

我们并不生活在纯生态中,所以

虽然生态隐喻非常

有用,但我发现它确实有用 并没有

完全捕捉到我之前

提到的事实,即

我们之间存在道德关系,在

某种意义上,我们每个人都可以

对他人负责,我

认为这就是促使一些

基于人际交往的社会的原因

当我们谈论下载

接触者追踪应用程序时,新加坡的回应让您

知道采取的行动 这不仅仅是出于技术原因

这样做,而是因为当我们谈论人们待在家里时,它有助于确保

其他人的安全

并确保我们自己的安全

不仅仅是一种自我隔离,它是一项

技术性的访问以

击败病毒,它已经完成,因为它可以帮助

每个人保持安全,我们的标语之一

是所有人的安全

取决于每个人的贡献,

权利 我认为这种道德关系

不会被生态

隐喻所捕捉,因此我们需要将隐喻

用于他们告诉我们的内容,但请记住

,每个隐喻都是goi ng 也有

一定的限制

,我们有一个来自低层 Colcord 的问题

,它是关于你的家 你的

祖国新加坡

对美国有什么学习我认为这是一个

非常及时的问题,关于减轻

这种不同的考文特对

少数族裔的影响

你知道的人口 新加坡有着

深厚的多元文化状况和

环境 我们是世界上

宗教和文化最多元化的

国家之一 我们有 75% 的

华人人口 我们有大约 25%

的人口由

马来人和 印度人和许多其他

少数族裔我们也有许多新的

少数族裔加入,

尽管新加坡的很多情况来自这样一个

事实,即我们非常

密集和彬彬有礼地挤满了我们

是一个非常城市化的城市类型

这意味着

我们处理多样性

的方式与

像我们这样更大的实体不同 它有多种

类型的城市空间,包括

大城市和大都市,但也包括

小城镇,我想说的

是,对我们来说真正重要的是确保

在多样性中存在统一感

我认为

公民民族主义是一套共同的价值观,

例如我们所做的多元文化主义和精英管理,

但同样

重要的是要认识到,在

其中,文化

有空间表达自己

是很重要的,有宗教自由这种

表达自由 对于

不同

社区所拥有的历史、文化和传统,我们

发现在那种广泛的统一和

多样性结构中,我们看到的是

你拥有多样性的情况

是一种互相玩耍我

来自一个深深的家庭

实际上,我爸爸是半个泰米尔人

半欧亚人的混血儿,因为

如果你回到

1500 年代,他有一些葡萄牙血统 我的母亲是巴基斯坦

和马来人

的一部分,我的曾祖母

在她还是个婴儿的时候就被一个穆斯林家庭收养了,

所以我有很长一段时间

来和解,不仅仅是和解,

还有你 学会在

永恒的多样性中庆祝我,我们

发现最近

在新加坡有越来越多像我这样的人有

更多的通婚,甚至在

没有通婚的地方也有

更多的友谊,因为我们有共同

的空间。 我们创建了一个允许

这些不同社区相互交流

的系统,我们实际上有一个

系统,我们不允许

在国家补贴的公共住房中创建飞地和隔

都,

每个整体公寓楼都有混合

存在的,我们确保每个人

上的学校都是多元化的

非华裔学生去那里

是因为他们想学好普通话

我想

向我提出,他说

在阳光下呆了几个星期后,

每个人都是棕色的,然后

每个人和这种皮肤颜色

开始

变得不那么重要了,所以这些公共空间变得如此

重要,我 考虑允许

各种互动,允许存在

对良好生态和严格

生态至关重要的多样性,但这些

多样性并非偶然存在,它们

需要通过深思熟虑的政策

和 刻意维护这些公共

空间 最新的挑战当然

是在线公共空间的权利,以

确保在这些数字空间内我们

也保持神圣和

公关 保护少数群体,我们

努力确保少数族裔

在性别方面确实存在

正确的保护

措施,网络欺凌不存在

,并且我们允许这样一个事实,即如果

有邪恶的事情发生 在

那里,我们也有办法做出回应,

把它们放在

一起 社区也很

成熟,所以我认为我们有

时间再发表评论再提出一个问题,

这个来自

斯蒂芬帕特里克我住在一个

岛屿框架上你的隐喻是

一个很好的问题现在你知道新加坡

是一个有趣的难题因为我们

是一个州,我们是一座城市,我们是一座岛屿

,我们同时是所有这些东西,

这意味着与许多

其他拥有 许多城市的

大型国家腹地的利益,

他们不必照顾

他们的国家安全,我们确实

必须看看这一点,我

想说实际上不仅仅是

岛屿很重要,而是

城市之间的菲斯特互连 - 陈述

一个真正影响我们如何

处理许多政策制定的岛屿,以及

作为新加坡人的某种方法,

因为城市 我们所做的城市方面

是我们知道我们需要对

世界开放的地方 我们需要对

想法开放 对人们来说,因为这

就是城市蓬勃发展的方式,他们不会通过

将自己锁起来并将

自己变成堡垒而繁荣,但因为

我们是一个国家,我们还需要

培养一定的民族

认同感,我们希望相互

团结和

就像我说的那样,在价值观方面对民族主义的承诺,作为一个

岛屿,我们需要不断地

接受来自外部的各种影响,

其中最明显的是身体上的影响

对了,我们一直作为枢纽的转运货物是我们

的岛屿自然

实际上帮助我们

与世界其他地方建立联系并取得联系的第一种方式,

因为我们处于

多条贸易路线的连接中 世界

,我们是

许多航运强国的非常方便的转口港,

但现代的等价物

是成为数字空间的枢纽和企业家

为思想和人们提供虚拟空间

,这就是为什么 我们会

发现,如果您来新加坡,

外籍人士社区实际上相当

大,有些人发现

即使他们来到这里,调整也

容易得多,因为有现成的

人群已经同化了

与他们不同的其他成员,

但在 不仅有

一定程度的宽容,而且

还有对

人们所面临的整体多样性的庆祝,所以当你

整体的 cosmop 一个城市的寡头主义,

具有深厚的国家民族主义

和对思想的普遍开放

,一个岛屿所拥有的人员和货物流动

,我认为这通常是

构成新加坡人核心心理的因素,我认为

你的下一份工作可能是在旅游

局 我不确定 Aaron 非常感谢你

和你说话真是太高兴了

,你是最好的,非常

感谢你让我,海伦,非常感谢,

这很值得呆在外面

过了午夜哦谢谢